Abstract
Boundary behavior of a given important function or its limit values are essential in the whole spectrum of mathematics and science. We consider some tractable cases of limit values in which either a difference of two ingredients or a difference equation is used coupled with the relevant functional equations to give rise to unexpected results. As main results, this involves the expression for the Laurent coefficients including the residue, the Kronecker limit formulas and higher order coefficients as well as the difference formed to cancel the inaccessible part, typically the Clausen functions. We establish these by the relation between bases of the Kubert space of functions. Then these expressions are equated with other expressions in terms of special functions introduced by some difference equations, giving rise to analogues of the Lerch-Chowla-Selberg formula. We also state Abelian results which not only yield asymptotic formulas for weighted summatory function from that for the original summatory function but assures the existence of the limit expression for Laurent coefficients.
Keywords:
Lerch-Chowla-Selberg formula; modular relation; Laurent coefficients; Lerch zeta-function; Hurwitz zeta-function MSC:
11F03; 01A55; 40A30; 42A16
1. Introduction
In a sense, whole mathematics especially number theory has been centered around the Laurent coefficients of the relevant zeta-and L-functions since Dirichlet, Kronecker, Lerch, Hecke, Siegel, Choela-Selberg. It is no wonder that there have appeared enormous amount of papers on the Laurent coefficients of a large class of zeta-, L- and special functions. They are referred to as generalized Euler constants or Euler-Stieltjes constants [,,,,,,,,] [] (pp. 71–81), [,,,] to name a few. Reference [] is concerned with a series expression for the Euler digamma function
with Hurwitz zeta-function values coefficients, where the Hurwitz zeta-function is defined by (10) below. References [,] are concerned with the Gaussian field.
We shall establish the far-reaching theorem, Theorem 4 below, as a consequence of the relation between bases of the Kubert space of functions and the fact that the polylogarithm function is the limit function.
In literature one finds isolated-looking formulas without references to their origin, e.g., ([], (10), p. 10)
or ([], (2.6))
the partial fraction expansion for the contangent, which is known to be equivalent to the functional equation for the Riemann zeta-function (see [], Chapter 5). In this paper we refer to the results in [,] freely. Especially [] (§4.3), [] (§1.2, Chapter 4), etc. Equation (2) underlies (81) below. We shall elucidate the source of them in Section 8.
Let be a Dirichlet character mod M and let
be the Dirichlet L-function associated to . We may include the Riemann zeta-function as a special case with the trivial character mod 1; .
These are continued meromorphically over the whole plane with a simple pole at for the principal character. with a non-principal character can be continued analytically over and the point is a regular point with the Taylor coefficients , as well as special values (see Section 4).
Indeed, in ([], pp. 71–81), almost all (buds of) ingredients are given for the study of generalized Euler constants and is worth being called genesis of the study of generalized Euler constants including the Kronecker limit formula ([], pp. 161–182). It gives an explicit evaluation of the Laurent constant of the Epstein zeta-function.
The generalized Euler constants in (53) for an arithmetic progression is naturally a highlighted subject and after [,,,], Shirasaka [] is a culmination providing the genuine generating function for them, based on the theory of Hurwitz zeta-function. In another direction, References [,] are another summit of the study on periodic Dirichlet series, appealing to the Deninger-Meyer method, based on the theory of Lerch zeta-function. One of our main results is Theorem 4 which give the evaluation of the generalized Euler constants in terms of Hurwitz and Lerch zeta-functions. This reflects the base change of the Kubert space as described by Milnor. The other main result of ours is an Abelian theorem in the spirit of [,,] entailing []. Under the assumption of the functional equation, this depends on [] and partly [] and without it, depends on []. Thus these two theorems pave a promenade to the study on Laurent series coefficients of a large class of zeta- and special functions starting from the Abelian theorem.
2. Lerch Zeta-Function
Here we assemble various facts about the Lerch zeta-function, see also Proposition 2 below and the subsequent passage. The Lerch zeta-function is the polylogarithm function of order s with complex exponential argument
absolutely convergent for .
This is a special case of (9) with , and is a boundary function thereof and we sometimes refer to it as the boundary Lerch zeta-function.
In general the polylogarithm function of order s is defined by
for or cf. [,], ([], pp. 114–127),
The domain of convergence—unit disc is mapped onto the upper half-plane by the familiar transformation
with denoting the upper half-plane . Under (8),
which is absolutely convergent in for all . (9) is the q-expansion, i.e., the Laurent expansion around ∞. The unit circle corresponds to the boundary of , the real line , i.e., .
See [] for boundary functions in which a looser condition of almost convergence is assumed. In our case it is analyticity and it produces rich results.
In the last a few decades, the most fundamental and influential work related to the Lerch zeta-function are [,,,] which are partly incorporated in []. Milnor [] gives a very clear description of the 2-dimensional vector space of Kubert functions and above all things elucidates the functional Equations (11) and (12) for the Hurwitz and the Lerch zeta-function as the relation between basis elements. Yamamoto [] established the vector space structure of periodic arithmetic functions or the corresponding Dirichlet series and evaluated the special values by providing sound basics for the Lerch zeta-function. The main results are the expressions of short character sums in terms of these special values (see []). The method of discrete Fourier transform DFT (or finite Fourier series) has been also developed therein. For examples, see [,,].
As a continuation of these, the second author [] applied the Deninger-Meyer method to evaluate the three types of quantities , and the generalized Euler constants (see Section 4).
The boundary Lerch zeta-function (6) has its counterpart, the Hurwitz zeta-function
This is continued meromorphically over the whole plane with a simple pole at .
These are connected by the Hurwitz formula (i.e., the functional equation for the Hurwitz zeta-function), with being the limiting case (14): for ,
while its reciprocal is
By Equation (12), the boundary Lerch zeta-function is continued meromorphically over the whole plane with a plausible singular point. However, it is also a regular posit since the pole of is cancelled by the factor by (75). See ([], pp. 145–147), ([], pp. 65–84), [], etc.
Both of these reduce to the Riemann zeta-function for for the former and for the latter:
valid for in the first instance. This is continued meromorphically over the whole place with a simple pole at by way of the functional equation
which is a direct special case of (19) and indeed is equivalent to (12). Most of known zeta-functions satisfy the functional equation of this kind and the relations equivalent to it, the modular relations, have been developed in [].
We remark that both the Lerch and Hurwitz zeta-functions are special cases of the Lipschitz-Lerch transcendent ([], Chapter 3) which in turn is the boundary function of the Hurwitz-Lerch zeta-function
In the paper [] ubiquity of the Lerch zeta-function, especially the monologarithm (21) of the complex exponential argument, has been pursued.
In [] the ubiquity and omnipotence is shown of the (boundary) Lerch zeta-function by proving above all things that even Yamamoto’s decisive results on short character sums [], in the long run, are consequences of the modular relation, i.e., the functional equation for the Lerch zeta-function. Also mentioned is the closed expressions for the Laurent coefficients, called generalized Euler constants (see Section 4).
Below we assemble various known facts about Lerch and Hurwitz zeta-function that lie scattered around in literature.
For , the series on the right of (6) is uniformly convergent in an interval not containing an integer and defines the polylogarithm function of order 1, which is indeed, the boundary function given as the genuine Fourier series—the monologarithm function (21) below. See []. We refer to (9) as the Lerch zeta-function with (6) as its boundary function.
Thus the Lerch zeta-function incorporates three aspects—modular function (9), the boundary function as the zeta-function (6) and the monologarithm function (6) with .
For fixed , the Lerch zeta-function (9) is a one-valued analytic function on the -plane with slit along negative imaginary axis and its translations by integers, i.e.,
Let be the -th Bernoulli polynomial of degree with and let be the integer part of x.
For , the -th periodic Bernoulli polynomial is defined by
where indicates the fractional part.
The following is well-known and taken as a heaven-sent fact that it has the Fourier expansion, cf. []
where the prime on the summation sign means that is excluded and the summation is taken in symmetric sense.
In ([], (3.7), pp. 48–50) there is a list of equivalent expressions for the Hurwitz and reverse Hurwitz formulas. One of them reads
which in particular gives the Fourier series for . More generally, see ([], (1.1)). Hence (18) may be viewed as a consequence of the modular relation (19).
The novel view-point stated for the first time in [] is that it is the very Definition (6), as the boundary function of the “q-expansion,” of the Lerch zeta-function that gives the Fourier expansion (18) and (70) when substituted in (71) and (72) and that for finding radial limits, use of the Lerch zeta-function is in the very nature of things since it does is the limit function.
For the latter, as has been noticed [], there are many instances of radial limits in which the odd part, the first periodic Bernoulli polynomial, of the polylogarithm function of order 1 appears as a result of eliminating the real part, the log sin function. For examples, see [,]. The polylogarithm function of order 1 is indeed the monologarithm function, the ordinary logarithm function extended to the circle of convergence ()
The series is absolutely convergent for and uniformly convergent for .
We assemble the identities for of which use has been made.
, where
is its real part, the first Clausen function (or the loggamma function) and the imaginary part is (71) with , which reads
for , where indicates the greatest integer function.
3. Limit Values in Riemann’s Fragment II
We elucidate the main ingredients from the first author’s paper [] and its sequel []. Reference [] condenses the 67 pages long paper [] into 17 pages.
In order to remove singularities, it is rather common to use a well-known device of taking the odd part or an alternate sum described by
resp.
by (24), where n runs over a finite range or the series are absolutely convergent. All sums in Definition 1 are odd parts. Thus the following result follows if only we may take the limit , which is assured by Theorem 2 below.
All the theorems that Riemann considers in the second fragment are rephrases of the results of §40 of Jacobi and we state them as the following
Definition 1.
Let . The elliptic modular functions are defined respectively by
and
where in the last two sums, following Riemann, p runs through odd integers.
Theorem 1
([], Theorem 3). Let be a rational number with M even and and let . Then we have
and
and
for Q odd. Similar but more involved results hold for Q even.
To state the Dirichlet-Abel theorem ([], Theorem 1) we need rudiments of the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT). Its theory is stated in many literature, [,], ([], pp. 89–109) etc. The theory of DFT for arithmetic functions has been developed in [] in the case of periodic functions. See also ([], §8.1), ([], §§4.1, 4.3). Let
where a is an integer variable. Then the set forms a basis of the vector space of all periodic functions f with period M. We define the DFT (or the bth Fourier coefficient) of by
Then the Fourier inversion or Fourier expansion formula holds true:
Note that (34) is the expression of f with respect to the basis . An important relation reads
with the Gauss sum
Another instance is the following. Let be the characteristic function mod M ([], p. 73).
Then is a basis of and
Let
Since
the series in (39) is absolutely convergent for . Let denote the set of all Dirichlet series of the form (39). Then it forms a vector space of dimension M canonically isomorphic to . One of the bases of is . Hence we have
It follows that can be continued meromorphically over the whole plane and that it is entire if and only if which is defined by
Another basis of is , where
where indicates the partial zeta-function. Hence in parallel to (40), we have another expression
Proposition 1.
Theorem 2
(Dirichlet-Abel). Let M be a fixed modulus . Let denote a complex-valued function defined on such that for , and a fortiori, there are M different functions. Assume that each is of Lipschitz , and for each . Then the Dirichlet series
is uniformly convergent in and .
We note that if f is odd (see (49) below), then , which explains why the odd parts are far easier to treat and the left-hand side of (47) reduces to . Enough to recall the case of the class number formula for an odd Dirichlet character (see (81)). For a more general result than (47), see Theorem 4 below.
Example 1.
The well-known Dirichlet’s test for uniform convergence is a special case of Theorem 2. Theorem 1 follows from Theorem 2 by choosing essentially
Example 2
([,,]). We let
be odd, resp. even part of f: . Then
which amounts to (51) on clearing the denominators and multiplying by .
The Dirichlet series , as in [] are said to satisfy the ramified functional equation, a special case of ([], (7.18), p. 216) with if
Thsi will be developed in several directions starting from [].
4. Generalized Euler Constants
The genesis of generalized Euler constants lies in the Laurent expansion of around :
where indicates the Euler constant.
Since one of the driving forces in number theory has been generalizing to an arithmetic progression, it is natural to consider the generalized Euler constants for an arithmetic progression a mod M. The kth one is defined in the first instance by
A concise survey of literature about them may be found in []. One of two most proper ways of introducing them is through the Laurent expansion of the partial zeta-function defined in (42):
Here indicates the Hurwitz zeta-function (10) whose Laurent expansion were obtained by Wilton [], Berndt [], Balakrishnan [], et al.
(54) is a genuine generating function for :
Theorem 3
([]). The Laurent expansion
holds and moreover,
The other method, as can be predicted e.g., from the Hurwitz formula (11), depends on the Lerch zeta-function and the method is called the Deninger-Meyer method as described below.
Since (38) reads for
it follows that
as is indicated by []. Hence finding the derivatives and the generalized Euler constants lead to the same thing.
As has been remarked in [], the three types of quantities , and may be treated in a unified way based on the expressions ( for non-trivial) which follow from (35):
where is the normalized Gauss sum (36).
Generalized Euler constants have been studied in other two contexts. One is related to the Piltz divisor problem. References [,,,,] all of which have been elucidated in []. The other is related to the estimate of them including [,,], etc. For the Ableian theorem, refer to Section 7.
In Deninger [] (see also Meyer [], pp. 526–557) it has been shown that the best and most proper approach to the determination of Laurent coefficients of a zeta-function is to use the reciprocal of the Hurwitz formula, i.e., to appeal to the functional equation (12) ([], pp. 48–51), expanding the analytic function on the right-hand side into power series around , which involves higher derivatives of the Hurwitz zeta-function. We call this the Deninger-Meyer method. The Hurwitz zeta-function and its derivatives can be characterized as a principal solution to the difference Equation (91) (see Section 5 below). This establishes the closed formula for the derivative of the Dirichlet L-function at leading to the generalized Lerch-Chowla-Selberg formula for a real quadratic field beyond that of an imaginary quadratic field. Thus, this gives the evaluation of for . Higher order derivatives are computed in [] and then more extensively in []. See ([], pp. 177–191). This procedure is a reminiscence of Stark’s method of evaluating the value at rather at of L-functions, [,,] etc.
Let
([], p. 192, Problem 5) gives
where are Stirling numbers of the second kind defined by
Here indicates the difference operator ([], p. 13), ([], p. 202) defined by
and in general
Comtet ([], pp. 224–229) is the most informative reference book on Stirling numbers.
Proposition 2
([]). For and
where the integral is taken along a line joining 0 and τ. The boundary functions are
whose special case being
for while for
where is the ϰ-th periodic Bernoulli polynomial in (17) and is the counterpart, the ϰ-th Clausen function. The first Clausen function is given by (22) and higher order ones are obtained by integration:
where the sign function is 1 for , for and 0 for .
However, using the analytic function , the situation is much more transparent. Indeed, from (69) we have natural expressions:
and
which are in conformity with the functional equations (parity relation)
Since we have the formula
the parity relation (73) entails
This is a generalization of trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta-function.
We turn to the case of Dirichlet series with periodic coefficients described toward the end of Section 3.
Let
be the Laurent expansion of around . Then we have following one of our main theorems generalizing ([], Theorem 2) and ([], Theorem).
Theorem 4
(Base change relation).
where
i.e., is a generating function of and a fortiori,
the case leading to (47).
Proof.
Equation (77) follows from Proposition 1.
Corollary 1.
This is a prototype of the equivalence theorem in [] to the effect that the finite expressions for the Dirichlet class number formula is equivalent to (80). See also ([], Chapter 8). For odd, we have the finite expression
which leads to the finite form of the class number formula and it is here that (2) appears as the odd part.
Funakura [] deduces as his main theorem, the Kronecker limit formula for which is compactly represented as Corollary 2 below. His proof depends on the first equality of Proposition 1 and therein he uses Gauss’ formula to transform the result into the required form. For its elucidation we refer to [].
Corollary 2
([], Theorem 5).
which may be expressed as
and as
The pioneer results of Briggs [] and Lehmer [] are immediate and natural consequences of (47) or (79) with as well as a corollary to Funakura’s theorem, Corollary 2:
Example 3
([], (6)).
Example 4
([]).
This follows from (55).
Theorem 4 shows ubiquity of . However, the main formula (79) is in its first stage. For the Deninger-Meyer method involves its second stage of expressing the derivatives of the Lerch zeta-function by those of the Hurwitz zeta-function.
We may compute the higher order Laurent coefficients of around by (40) by applying the Deninger-Meyer method, i.e., by finding the coefficient of of in (12).
where run through integers whose sum is . In actual calculation, one can omit those terms which correspond to by (75).
Corresponding to (87), we have
Hence
It can be shown that Kummer’s Fourier series is, in the long run, equivalent to the functional equation for the Riemann zeta-function ([], p. 108; [], pp. 168–175).
5. Difference Equations
According to ([], p. 173) there is a solution to the difference equation
given by the Gaussian representation
such that is convex for large argument and
Theorem 5
([], Theorem 2.2).
is the uniquely determined solution to (91) having the value 0 at and a fortiori
on choosing
The well-known Lerch formula
is a special case of (95).
The R-function or higher order derivatives of the Hurwitz zeta-function is introduced using the Dufresnoy-Pisot theorem which is a generalization of the Bohr-Mollerop theorem [] while in [] Nörlund’s principal solution [] is used which is also used in [] to introduce a generalized gamma function to express the generalized Euler constants. Its logarithmic derivative appears in Ramanujan’s second notebook []. Higher-order derivatives of Dirichlet L-function has been studied in [], ([], §8.1) using the Deninger -function. In a similar setting, Vignéras [] uses the Dufresnoy-Pisot theorem to introduce the Barnes multiple gamma function (see [], pp. 49–50).
After [,] it was Dilcher [,] and Kanemitsu [] who developed the theory of generalized Euler constants. Most of these results have been summarized and elucidated in []. There are further generalizations and we refer to [] and references there given. We may use the Deninger-Meyer method to find Laurent coefficients of a more general class of Dirichlet series including, for example, References [,] in terms of principal solutions to a difference equation, which will be conducted elsewhere.
As an analogy to , Dilcher ([], (4.3)) introduces the kth generalized gamma function as a principal solution to the DE
By Theorem 5, we have apparently
so that we could build a theory of on that of the Hurwitz zeta-function (for the case of the theory of gamma function on the Riemann zeta-function, see [], Chapter 5).
The general formula for the difference operator of order with difference is given by
If f has the -th derivative , then
This has been most prominently applied by Landau [] and has been constantly used by later authors in the context of Riesz means.
6. Abel-Tauber Process
Our aim in this section is to formulate a theorem which improves the asymptotic formulas in [] and generalizes [] to the case of a general Dirichlet series satisfying a functional equation, where we let
be a Dirichlet series absolutely convergent in some half-plane where is a complex sequence and is an increasing sequence with . Instead of studying the behavior of each value of , it is customary and more effective to consider the summatory function
with empty sum being 0. Asymptotic formulas for the summatory function (103) may be obtained by various methods. The most typical way is the use of the Cauchy residue theorem and application of the functional equation, if any, satisfied by . Historically, Voronoĭ’s expression for the summatory function of the divisor function led to the estimate []. One of the most comprehensive treatment has been given by []. Its generalization to the class of Dirichlet series with periodic coefficients has been done in [].
Lemma 1
([], Satz 1.4, p. 371). For and as above suppose is of class on . then the formula for integration by parts
holds true.
In the following lemma we use the notation. as in (102) and and they satisfy the functional equation (107) with the multiple gamma factor
and
below is essentially in (103) and is essentially the sum of residues of which gives rise to the main term in Theorem 6.
Lemma 2
([], Theorem 4.1). Suppose that the functional equation
is satisfied with and that the only singularities of the function are poles. Then we have
where
for every , and where , maximum of the real parts of singularities of φ, maximum of order of a pole with real part q, and . Herein, β is such that .
If in addition, , then the last term in (109) can be suppressed.
Theorem 6
(Abel-Tauber theorem). Suppose
denoting a polynomial of degree l, as a result of the functional equation (Lemma 2) or otherwise. Then for and k a non-negative integer
where
whence
Proof.
By the first equality in (104),
Substituting the first equality in (110) and applying integration by parts to the integral involving , we have
where and . Hence (112) follows from which (111) follows. To prove (112), we note that
Hence for
For simplicity we take and substitute (111). It suffices to consider the case in which case and so its contribution to the main term in (111) is
We use the case . Then this simply becomes the same as in ([], p. 41) and so
which shows (113) almost verbatim to that of Theorem 1 of []. □
Corollary 3
([], Theorem 1). If and
then
where
whence
Remark 1.
As remarked by [], the result is true for , . (111) gives asymptotic formulas for a large class of arithmetic functions including those studied by []. The results of Theorem 6 are still true if (110) is replaced by the PNT type estimate, which corresponds to the case in ([], p. 112). Theorem 6 generalized in this way may serve to unify the unorganized tables of asymptotic formulas given in some collections of formulas in number theory.
The proof of Lemma 2 depends on the Riesz sums and then the differencing (100). In order to cover the case of periodic Dirichlet series, we need to incorporate the situation of ramified functional equations as in Smith [], which will be conducted elsewhere.
7. Quellenangaben
Some authors are concerned with analogues of the generalized Euler constants in the Gaussian field with the ring of Gaussian integers.
Ref. [] is concerned with a bi-dimensional analogue of the Euler constant defined by
where
and in the spirit of [].
Ref. [] is concerned with the Laurent expansion
and he deduced from the Kronecker limit formula
where indicates the Dedekind eta-function whose 24th power is (a constant multiple of) the discriminant function
see ([], p. 95), ([], Theorem 4.4). Then Elstrodt applies the pre-Lerch-Chowla-Selberg formula
which follows from Hurwitz’s result []
where the prime on the summation sign means that the pair is excluded and
is a special case of the lemniscate function ([], p. 524) and
first proved by Legendre. The same result is stated on ([], p. 176). For the celebrated Lerch-Chowla-Selberg formula we refer to Section 8.1 below. It gives a relation between two independent special functions—elliptic and gamma functions, and is a consequence of the combination of the Kronecker limit formula (which is a consequence of the Fourier-Bessel expansion) and the decomposition of the Dedekind zeta-function. Equation (125) also follows from the modula relation, and so Legendre’s result (127) might, in the long run, correspond to a pre-class field theory for lemniscate functions. We will come to this elsewhere.
According to Wintner ([], p. 634), by the theory of elliptic modular functions, all expansions considered by Jacobi in his §40 must be identical consequences of the corresponding expansions of the (principal) logarithm of the fundamental invariant (123), that is, of the expansion
Wintner ([], p. 628) also mentions “Riemann’s posthumous fragment, based on $ 40 of Jacobi’s Fundament Nova, consists of two parts, I and II, ⋯” These imply that all the results in Section 3 are to be limit values of the discriminant function (or Dedekind eta-function). Thus, it seems probable that in Definition 1, one expresses the Lambert series in terms of Lerch zeta-functions and then apply the Dirichlet-Abel theorem to deduce all the results at a stretch. We might also obtain pre-Lerch-Chowla-Selberg type formulas in the spirit of (124) if we consider the even part. We will study this elsewhere.
References [,,] give Abelian theorems to the effect that if an asymptotic formula for the summatory function (103) is known, then the one for can be derived where is an integer, which then implies the Laurent expansion for in (102). Ref. [] uses the Laplace transform and so does []. The asymptotic formula is of the from , . Briggs [] enhances [] and arrive at an Abelian theorem with with P a polynomial of degree l or with K as large as we please. The latter is a weak form of the PNT and this setting has been fully generalized in [] in which the asymptotic formula for is derived from analytic properties of the generating Dirichlet series (102). It also includes the case where (102) has logarithmic singularities, covering the best known form of the PNT. References [,] are similar to [].
8. Elucidation of Some Identities
Proof of (2) depends on (55), (11) and (68). Indeed, substituting (2) with x replaced by from (2), we obtain after transformation
Now taking the limit on using (11) and (68), we conclude (2).
Remarkably enough, this in conjunction with (47) leads to a generalization of the reverse Eisenstein formula [,], ([], pp. 318–319):
This is not coincidental and clarifies the reason why the cotangent function appears in the Dedekind sums and the Dirichlet class number formula, ([], pp. 72–74). According to [], the cotangent function is an odd basis of the Kubert space and , form a basis of a vector space of odd functions in . Ref. ([], Lemma 2.1) which plays a crucial role in the proof of the reciprocity laws for Dedekind-like sums is a special case of (47).
We must recall the warning in [] that formal use of (66) for linear independence over leads to triviality since what appear are only derivatives of cotangents.
Elucidation of the genesis of the partial fraction expansion (3) for the cotangent function has been done in many literature and we refer to ([], pp. 87–104), ([], pp. 10–11, Chapter 4), etc. It is shown that (3) is a special case of the Fourier-Bessel series equivalent to the functional equation of Riemann’s type with a single gamma factor.
8.1. Concluding Remarks
We shall give a rather short but high-brow description of the Lerch-Chowla-Selberg formula according to ([], pp. 12–15), see also ([], pp. 119–124), [,,], etc., for a related account. We omit most of the details and assume basic facts.
Suppose is the imaginary quadratic field of discriminant and let be the Dedekind zeta-functio of . It can be decomposed into the sum of h class zeta-functions which corresponds to the partial zeta-functions (see (42)): , where is the ideal class group of which is of order h—the class number of . The class zeta-function can be viewed as an Epstein zeta-function of a positive definite binary quadratic form Q: . It has a simple pole at with residue , w indicating the number of roots of 1 in and so the residue of at is as found by Dirichlet. Cf. (81) for the case of an odd character.
The Laurent constant of was found by Kronecker in terms of the Dedekind eta-function. This part arises from the Fourier-Bessel series which is equivalent to the functional equation (of Hecke type) for the Epstein zeta-function ([], Chapter 4).
On the other hand, we have the product decomposition
where is the Dirichlet L-function associated to the primitive Dirichlet character modulo .
Hence the residue at is also expressed as , whence the Dirichlet class number formula
Since h is finite, it is desirable to express the infinite series in finite form, which is called the class number deformation. One of the most famous expressions involves the generalized Bernoulli number.
For the Laurent constant , where is the Euler constant, one has to express in finite terms by appealing to Kummer’s Fourier series for , see []. As in [], this part also depends on the functional equation for the Dirichlet L-function.
Then equating two expressions, one obtains the equality between finite sums of the gamma values and eta-values, which was first found by Lerch and re-discovered by Chowla and Selberg [].
Thus the Lerch-Chowla-Selberg formula is a consequence of the functional equations for the Epstein zeta-function and Dirichlet L-function plus class field theory since the decomposition (131) in the very long run, a consequence of the theory. This suggests the following problem.
Problem. Suppose there are two zeta-functions and that both and the product have a simple pole at , say and satisfy the functional equation (of Hecke type, say). Then equate the Laurent constants of and to deduce a generalized Lerch-Chowla-Selberg formula. This should include the case of a cyclotomic field. These are more or less concerned with odd aspect. Naturally, the next step will be to study the case of even aspect of real quadratic fields etc. in which case even the Kronecker limit formula is not in preferable form [].
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.-L.W., P.A. and S.K.; methodology, S.K.; validation, P.A.; formal analysis, N.-L.W. and P.A.; investigation, N.-L.W., P.A. and S.K.; resources, S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; writing—review and editing, N.-L.W. and P.A.; supervision, P.A.; project administration, N.-L.W. and P.A.; funding acquisition, N.-L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The Article Processing Charges was supported by Shangluo University Key Disciplines Project. Discipline name: Mathematics. The 2nd author was supported by his research grant supported by SERB, Project Number: TAR/2018/000001.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thanks to the worthy referees and editor for their valuable suggestions for the paper in Mathematics.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Berndt, B.C. On the Hurwitz zeta-function. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 1982, 2, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briggs, W.E. Some Abelian results for Dirichlet series. Mathematika 1962, 9, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, T.; Khurana, S.S. Shifted Euler constants and a generalization of Euler-Stieltjes constants. J. Number Theory 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dilcher, K. On generalized gamma function related the Laurent coefficients of the Riemann zeta function. Aequationes Math. 1994, 48, 55–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elstrodt, J. Note on the Selberg trace formula for the Picard group. Abh. Math. Sem Univ. Hambg. 1985, 55, 207–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gramain, F.; Weber, M. Computing an arithmetic constant related to the ring of Gaussian integers. Math. Comp. 1985, 44, 241–250, S13–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Funakura, T. On Kronecker’s limit formula for Dirichlet series with periodic coefficients. Acta Arith. 1990, 55, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ishibashi, M.; Kanemitsu, S. Dirichlet series with periodic coefficients. Res. Math. 1999, 35, 70–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanemitsu, S. Evaluation of certain limits in closed form. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Number Theory, Univ. Laval; de Koninck, J.M., Levesque, C., Eds.; de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 1987; pp. 459–474. [Google Scholar]
- Landau, E. Über die zu einem algebraischen Zahlkörper gehörige Zetafunktion und die Ausdehnung der Tschebyscheffschen Primzahltheorie auf das Problem der Verteilung der Primideale. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1903, 125, 176–188. [Google Scholar]
- Lehmer, D.H. Euler constants for arithmetic progressions. Acta Arith. 1975, 27, 125–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirasaka, S. On the Laurent coefficients of a class of Dirichlet series. Res. Math. 2002, 42, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.-H.; Mehta, J.; Kanemitsu, S. The boundary Lerch zeta-function and short character sums a lá Y. Yamamoto. Kyushu J. Math. 2020. to appear. [Google Scholar]
- Wilton, J.R. A note on the coefficients in the development of ζ(s,x) in powers of s−1. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1927, 50, 329–332. [Google Scholar]
- Wilton, J.R. A proof of Burnside’s formula for logΓ(x + 1) and certain allied properties of Riemann’s ζ-function. Mess. Math. 1923, 55, 90–93. [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava, H.M.; Choi, J.-S. Series Associated with the Zeta and Related Functions; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Smart, J.R. On the values of the Epetein zeta- functions. Glasg. Math. J. 1973, 14, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kanemitsu, S.; Tsukada, H. Vistas of Special Functions; World Scientific: Singapore, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Kanemitsu, S.; Tsukada, H. Vistas of Special Functions II; World Scientific: Singapore, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kanemitsu, S.; Tsukada, H. Contributions to the Theory of Zeta-Functions: The Modular Relation Supremacy; World Scientific: Singapore, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Briggs, W.E. The irrationality of γ or of sets of similar constants. Nor. Vid. Selsk. Forh. 1961, 34, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty, K.; Kanemitsu, S.; Kuzumaki, T. Seeing the invisible: Around generalized Kubert functions. Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest. Sect. Comp. 2020, 47. to appear. [Google Scholar]
- Magi, B.; Banerjee, D.; Chakraborty, K.; Kanemitsu, S. Abel-Tauber process and asymptotic formulas. Kyushu J. Math. 2017, 71, 363–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Briggs, W.E.; Buschman, R.G. On power series constants of functions defined by Dirichlet series. Ill. J. Math. 1961, 41, 43–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandrasekharan, K.; Narasimhan, R. Functional equations with multiple gamma factors and the average order of arithmetical functions. Ann. Math. 1962, 76, 93–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, R.A. The average order of arithmetical functions over arithmetic progressions with applications to quadratic forms. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1980, 317, 70–88. [Google Scholar]
- Lewin, L. Structural Properties of Polylogarithms; AMS: Providence, RI, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Okuda, J.; Ueno, K. Relations for multiple zeta values and Mellin transform of multiple polylogarithms. Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 2004, 40, 537–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wintner, A. On Riemann’s fragment concerning elliptic modular functions. Am. J. Math. 1941, 63, 628–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamamoto, Y. Dirichlet series with periodic coefficients. In Proc. Intern. Sympos. “Algebraic Number Theory”; JSPS: Kyoto, Japan; Tokyo, Japan, 1977; pp. 275–289. [Google Scholar]
- Deninger, C. On the analogue of Chowla-Selberg formula for real quadratic fields. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1984, 351, 171–191. [Google Scholar]
- Laurinchikas, A.; Garunkstis, R. The Lerch Zeta-Function; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Milnor, J. On polylogarithms, Hurwitz zeta-functions and the Kubert identities. Enseign. Math. 1983, 29, 281–322. [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty, K.; Kanemitsu, S.; Kuzumaki, T. Annales Univ. Sci. Budapest. Sect. Comp. 2018, 47, 185–195. [Google Scholar]
- Papoulis, A. The Fourier Integral and Its Applications; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1924. [Google Scholar]
- Weaver, H.J. Applications of Discrete and Continuous Fourier Transforms; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Li, F.-H.; Kanemitsu, S. Around boundary functions of the right half-plane and the unit disc. Adv. Spec. Funct. Anal. Differ. Equ. 2019. to appear. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, N.-L. On Riemann’s posthumous Fragment II on the limit values of elliptic modular functions. Ramanujan J. 2011, 24, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.-L. Arithmetical Fourier and limit values of elliptic modular functions. Proc. Math. Sci. 2018, 128, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Reyna, A. Riemann’s Fragment on the limit values of elliptic modular functions. J. Ramanujan 2004, 8, 57–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winograd, S. Arithmetic Complexity of Computations; SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Li, F.-H.; Wang, N.-L.; Kanemitsu, S. Number Theory and Its Applications; World Scientific: Singapore, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Schnee, W. Die Funktionalgelichung der Zetafunktion und der Dirichletschen Reihen mit periodischen Koeffizienten. Math. Z. 1930, 31, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.-L. On generalized Euler constants and an integral related to the Piltx divisor problem, Fizikos ir matematikos fakulteto Seminaro darbai. Siauliu Univ. 2005, 8, 81–93. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.B.; Li, H.-Y.; Mehta, J. Around the Lipschitz summation formula. In Proceedings of the ICRDET, Rajasthan, India, 14–15 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Balakrishnan, U. On the Laurent expansion of ζ(s, a) at s = 1. J. Indian Math. Soc. 1982, 42, 181–187. [Google Scholar]
- Knopmacher, J. Generalized Euler constants. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 1978, 21, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Israilov, M.I. On the Laurent expansion of the Riemann zeta-function. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklov. 1981, 158, 98–104. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Lavrik, A.F. On the main term in the problem of divisors and the power series coefficients of the Riemann zeta-function in a neighborhood of its pole. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklov. 1976, 142, 165–173. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Lavrik, A.F.; Israilov, M.I.; Ëdgorov, Z. On an integral containing the remainder term in divisor problems. Acta Arith. 1980, 37, 381–389. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Sitaramachandrarao, R. An integral involving the remainder term in the Piltz divisor problem. Acta Arith. 1978, 48, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stankus, E.P. A remark on the Laurent coefficients of the Riemann zeta-function. Zap. Naucn. Sem. LOMI 1983, 121, 103–107. [Google Scholar]
- Ishikawa, H. On the coefficients of the Taylor expansion of the Dirichlet L-functions at s 1. Acta Arith. 2001, 97, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuoka, Y. Generalized Euler constants associated with the Riemann zeta-function. In Number Theory and Combinatorics; World Scientific: Singapore, 1985; pp. 279–295. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuoka, Y. On power series coefficients of the RIemann zeta-function. Tokyo J. Math. 1989, 12, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, C. L-Reihen quadratischer Zahlkörper. Vorlesungen, Köln; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty, K.; Kanemitsu, S.; Kuzumaki, T. Finite expressions for higher derivatives of the Dirichlet L-function and the Deninger R-function. Hardy-Ramanujan J. 2015, 32, 38–53. [Google Scholar]
- Chinburg, T. Derivatives of L-functions at s = 0 (after Stark, Tate, Bienenfeld and Lichtenbaum). Compos. Math. 1983, 48, 119–127. [Google Scholar]
- Stark, H.M. L-functions at s = 1. IV. First derivatives at s = 0. Adv. Math. 1980, 17, 60–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Stark, H.M. Derivatives of L-series at s = 0. In Automorphic Forms, Representation Theory and Arithmetic (Bombay, 1979); Tata Inst.: Bombay, India, 1981; pp. 261–273. [Google Scholar]
- Riordan, J. Combinatorial Identities; Krieger: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Comtet, L. Advanced Combinatorics; Reidel: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Hashimoto, M.; Kanemitsu, S.; Toda, M. On Gauss’ formula for ψ and finite expressions for the L-series at 1. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 2008, 60, 219–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, K.; Kanemitsu, S.; Tsukada, H. Vistas of Special Functions II; World Scientific: Singapore; London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, R. Les In’egrales Eulérienne et Leurs Applications, étude Apprpoondie de la Fonction Gamma; Dunod: Paris, France, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Nörlund, N. Vorlesungen über Differenzenrechnung; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1924. [Google Scholar]
- Berndt, B.C. Ramanujan’s Notebooks, Part I; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Vignéras, M.-F. Factuer gamma et Équations fonctionnelles, Intern. Summer School on Modular Functions, Bonn. Lect. Notes Math. 1976, 627, 79–103. [Google Scholar]
- Dilcher, K. Generalized Euler constants for arithmetical progressions. Math. Comp. 1992, 59, 259–282, S21–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landau, E. Über die Anzahl der Gitterpunkte in gewissen Bereichen (Zweite Mit.). Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. Kl. 1915, 1915, 209–243. [Google Scholar]
- Buschman, R.G. Asymptotic expansions for ∑naf(n logr n). Pac. J. Math. 1959, 9, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Balakrishnan, U. Laurent expansion of Dirichlet series. Bull. Austr. Math. Soc. 1986, 33, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Voronoĭ, G.F. Sur une fonction transcendente et ses applications à la sommation de qulques séries. Ann. École Norm. Sup. 1904, 21, 459–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prachar, K. Primzahlverteilng; Springer Verl.: Berlin, Germany, 1957. [Google Scholar]
- Jordan, J.H. The divisibility of Gaussian integers by large Gaussian primes. Duke Math. J. 1965, 32, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serre, J.-P. A Course in Arithmetic; Springer Verl.: New York, NY, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, H.H. Theta Functions, Elliptic Functions and π; de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hurwitz, A. Über die Entwicklungskoeffizienten der lemniskatischen Funktionen. J. Math. Ann. 1899, 51, 196–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whittaker, E.T.; Watson, G.N. A Course in Modern Analysis, 4th ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1927. [Google Scholar]
- Berndt, B.C. Character analogues of the Poisson and Euler-Maclaurin summation formula with applications. J. Number Theory 1975, 7, 413–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balakrishnan, U. Laurent expansion of Dirichlet series II. Monatsh. Math. 1987, 103, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenstein, G. Aufgaben und Lehrsätze. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1844, 27, 281–283. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.-L.; Li, M. Hashimoto and S. Kanemitsu, Structural elucidation of Eisenstein formula. Sci. China 2010, 53, 2341–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathews, G.B. The Theory of Numbers, 2nd ed.; Chelsea: Cambridge, UK, 1892. [Google Scholar]
- Sitaramachandrarao, R. Dedekind and Hardy sums. Acta Arith. 1978, 48, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Girstmair, K. Letter to the editor. J. Number Theory 1986, 23, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Davenport, H. Multiplicative Number Theory, 2nd ed.; Springer Verl.: Berlin, Germany, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Siegel, C.L. Lectures on Advanced Analytic Number Theory, 2nd ed.; Tata Inst.: Bombay, India, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Kurokawa, N. One hundred years of the zeta regularized products. In The 39th Algebra Symposium; Math Soc. of Japan: Tokyo, Japan, 1994; pp. 153–166. [Google Scholar]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).