Next Article in Journal
Meshless Analysis of Nonlocal Boundary Value Problems in Anisotropic and Inhomogeneous Media
Next Article in Special Issue
Inequalities for Information Potentials and Entropies
Previous Article in Journal
Reverse Mortgage Risks. Time Evolution of VaR in Lump-Sum Solutions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bijective Mapping Analysis to Extend the Theory of Functional Connections to Non-Rectangular 2-Dimensional Domains
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On an Inequality for Legendre Polynomials

Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Str. Dr. I. Ratiu, No.5-7, RO-550012 Sibiu, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mathematics 2020, 8(11), 2044; https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112044
Submission received: 17 September 2020 / Revised: 3 November 2020 / Accepted: 13 November 2020 / Published: 17 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Inequalities and Functional Analysis)

Abstract

:
This paper is concerned with the orthogonal polynomials. Upper and lower bounds of Legendre polynomials are obtained. Furthermore, entropies associated with discrete probability distributions is a topic considered in this paper. Bounds of the entropies which improve some previously known results are obtained in terms of inequalities. In order to illustrate the results obtained in this paper and to compare them with other results from the literature some graphs are provided.

1. Introduction

The classical orthogonal polynomials play an important role in applications of mathematical analysis, spectral method with applications in fluid dynamics and other areas of interest. In the recent years many theoretical and numerical studies about Jacobi polynomials were given. Inequalities for Jacobi polynomials using entropic and information inequalities were obtained in [1]. Bernstein type inequalities for Jacobi polynomials and their applications in many research topics in mathematics were considered in [2]. A very recent conjecture (see [3]) which asserts that the sum of the squared Bernstein polynomials is a convex function in [ 0 , 1 ] was validated using properties of Jacobi polynomials.This conjecture aroused great interest, so that new proofs of it were given (see [4,5]). The main objective of this paper is to obtain upper and lower bounds of Legendre polynomials and to apply these results in order to give lower and upper bounds for entropies. Usually the entropies are described by complicated expressions, then it is useful to establish some bounds of them. The concept of entropy is a measure of uncertainty of a random variable and was introduced by C.E. Shannon in [6]. Later, A. Rényi [7] introduced a parametric family of information measures, that includes Shannon entropy as a special case. The classical Shannon entropy was given using discrete probability distributions. This concept was extended to the continuous case involving the continuous probability distributions. For more details about this topic, the reader is referred to the recent papers [8,9,10,11,12]. This paper is devoted to the entropy associated with discrete probability distribution.
The Jacobi polynomials P n ( α , β ) are orthogonal polynomials with respect to the weight ( 1 x ) α ( 1 + x ) β , α > 1 , β > 1 on the interval [ 1 , 1 ] . Their representation by hypergeometric function is given as follows (see [13,14])
P n ( α , β ) ( x ) = ( α + 1 ) n n ! 2 F 1 n , n + α + β + 1 ; α + 1 ; 1 x 2 ,
where
2 F 1 ( a , b ; c ; z ) = k = 0 ( a ) k ( b ) k ( c ) k · z k k ! , | z | < 1 ,
and ( a ) k = a ( a + 1 ) ( a + k 1 ) , k 1 , ( a ) 0 = 1 is the shifted factorial.
The normalization of P n ( α , β ) is effected by
P n ( α , β ) ( 1 ) = Γ ( n + α + 1 ) n ! Γ ( α + 1 ) .
Denote by R n ( α , β ) the polynomials:
R n ( α , β ) ( x ) = P n ( α , β ) ( x ) P n ( α , β ) ( 1 ) .
If α = β = λ , Jacobi’s polynomials P n ( α , β ) ( x ) are called Gegenbauer polynomials (ultraspherical polynomial). The usual notation and normalization for ultraspherical polynomial is the following (see [15])
C n ( λ ) ( x ) = Γ ( α + 1 ) Γ ( 2 α + 1 ) Γ ( n + 2 α + 1 ) Γ ( n + α + 1 ) P n ( α , α ) ( x ) = Γ λ + 1 2 Γ ( 2 λ ) Γ ( n + 2 λ ) Γ ( n + λ + 1 2 ) P n λ 1 2 , λ 1 2 ( x ) , α = λ 1 2 .
Note that
C n ( λ ) ( x ) = ( 2 λ ) n n ! R n ( λ 1 2 , λ 1 2 ) ( x ) = ( 2 λ ) n n ! 2 F 1 n , n + 2 λ ; λ + 1 2 ; 1 x 2 .
Some important special cases are the Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind
T n ( x ) = P n 1 2 , 1 2 ( x ) P n 1 2 , 1 2 ( 1 ) = R n 1 2 , 1 2 ( x ) ,
the Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind
U n ( x ) = C n ( 1 ) ( x ) = ( n + 1 ) P n 1 2 , 1 2 ( x ) P n 1 2 , 1 2 ( 1 ) = ( n + 1 ) R n 1 2 , 1 2 ( x ) ,
and the Legendre polynomial
P n ( x ) = C n ( 1 2 ) ( x ) = P n ( 0 , 0 ) ( x ) .

2. Preliminary Results

Theorem 1.
Let B n , k : = 1 2 2 n + 1 · 2 k k · 2 n 2 k + 2 n k + 1 , k , n N , k n . Then, the inequalities
α n < B n , k < β n ,
hold for all n N , k N { 0 } , k n , where
α n : = 1 π · 4 n + 1 + 1 2 + 1 8 ( n + 1 ) , β n : = 1 π · 4 46 4 1 + ( 8 + 46 ) ( n + 1 ) .
Proof. 
In order to prove the inequalities (7) we use Tóth’s result (see [16]):
1 π ( n + 1 4 + 1 32 n ) < Ω n < 1 π ( n + 1 4 + 1 46 n ) ,
where Ω n = 1 · 3 · · · ( 2 n 1 ) 2 · 4 · · · ( 2 n ) = 1 4 n 2 n n for n N * .
From (8), it follows that
2 π · 1 ( k + 1 4 + 1 32 k ) n k + 1 + 1 4 + 1 32 ( n k + 1 ) < B n , k < 2 π · 1 ( k + 1 4 + 1 46 k ) n k + 1 + 1 4 + 1 46 ( n k + 1 ) .
Let α [ 1 46 , 1 32 ] , and consider f : D R a function defined by
f ( x , y ) = x + 1 4 + α x y + 1 4 + α y ,
where D = { ( x , y ) R 2 | x > 0 , y > 0 , x + y = n + 1 } .
Further, we determine the extreme points of function f.
We consider F ( x , y ) = f ( x , y ) + λ ( x + y n 1 ) . From the system
F x = 0 F y = 0 F λ = x + y n 1 = 0 ,
we get
( y x ) · 4 x 2 y 2 4 α x y 4 α ( x 2 + y 2 ) 4 α x y α ( x + y ) 4 α 2 4 x 2 y 2 = 0 , ( y x ) { 4 x 2 y 2 α [ 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 + n + 1 + 4 α ] } = 0 ,
Solving the sistem we obtain the following stationary points:
A n + 1 2 , n + 1 2 , B n + 1 Δ 2 , n + 1 + Δ 2 , C n + 1 + Δ 2 , n + 1 Δ 2 ,
where Δ = ( n + 1 ) 2 2 α [ 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 + ( n + 1 ) + 4 α ] .
We have,
d 2 F ( x , y ) = F x 2 ( x , y ) d x 2 + 2 F x y ( x , y ) d x d y + F y 2 ( x , y ) d y 2 = [ F x 2 ( x , y ) 2 F x y + F y 2 ( x , y ) ] d x 2 .
Since d 2 F ( A ) < 0 , it follows that A is a maximum point for f. For ( x , y ) { B , C } , we have
d 2 F ( x , y ) = α 2 x 3 y 3 [ 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 + ( n + 1 ) + 4 α ] ( n + 1 ) 4 4 α [ 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 + ( n + 1 ) + 4 α ] ( n + 1 ) 2 + 4 x y d x 2 > 0 .
Then f attains its minimum value at the points B and C
We compute
f ( B ) = n + 1 Δ 2 + 1 4 + 2 α n + 1 Δ n + 1 + Δ 2 + 1 4 + 2 α n + 1 + Δ = α · 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 + ( n + 1 ) + 4 α + 4 n + 5 32 α 16 .
We observe that
f ( C ) = f ( B ) > 1 46 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 + ( n + 1 ) + 2 23 + n + 1 4 > 1 46 2 n + 2 + 1 4 + n + 1 4 ,
f ( B ) > 1 + ( 8 + 46 ) ( n + 1 ) 4 46 , f ( A ) = 1 4 n + 1 + 1 2 + 4 α n + 1 2 .
It follows
f ( B ) f ( x , y ) f ( A ) ,
1 f ( A ) 1 f ( x , y ) 1 f ( B ) ,
2 n + 1 + 1 2 + 4 α n + 1 1 f ( x , y ) 2 46 4 1 + ( 8 + 46 ) ( n + 1 ) .
For α 1 32 , 1 46 and k N { 0 } , we obtain (7). □
Remark 1.
The bounds of B n , k for n N and k = 0 were obtained [16], as follows
B n 1 , 0 = 1 2 2 n 1 2 n n 2 π n + 1 4 + 1 32 n , 2 π n + 1 4 + 1 46 n .
From Theorem 1 and (10), we get
α n < B n , k < γ n ,
for all k = 0 , 1 , , n , where γ n : = 2 π n + 1 + 1 4 + 1 46 ( n + 1 ) .

3. Bounds for Legendre Polynomials

Lemma 1.
Let
S n ( x ) : = k = 0 n 2 U n 2 k 1 + x 2 2 , x ( 1 , 1 ) ,
where x is integer part of positive real number x. The following relation holds
S n ( x ) = 1 2 ( 1 x ) n + 2 U n + 1 ( x ) .
Proof. 
From (1) and (2) the polynomials R n ( α , β ) admite the following representation by hypergeometric function
R n ( α , β ) = 2 F 1 n , n + α + β + 1 ; α + 1 ; 1 x 2 .
From [14] (eq. 4.7.30, p. 83) we have
R n λ 1 2 , λ 1 2 ( x ) = 2 F 1 n 2 , n 2 + λ ; λ + 1 2 ; 1 x 2 .
Therefore,
R 2 n ( 1 2 , 1 2 ) ( x ) = 2 F 1 n , n + 1 ; 3 2 ; 1 x 2 ,
R 2 n + 1 ( 1 2 , 1 2 ) ( x ) = 2 F 1 n 1 2 , n + 3 2 ; 3 2 ; 1 x 2 .
Using the below formula (see [17] ((15.3.3), p. 559))
2 F 1 ( a , b ; c ; z ) = ( 1 z ) c a b 2 F 1 ( c a , c b ; c ; z ) , | z | < 1 ,
we obtain
R 2 m + 1 ( 1 2 , 1 2 ) ( x ) = x 2 F 1 ( n + 2 , n ; 3 2 ; 1 x 2 ) .
Then,
R 2 n + 1 ( 1 2 , 1 2 ) 1 + x 2 = 1 + x 2 R n ( 1 2 , 1 2 ) ( x ) .
The link between Chebyshev polynomial of the first and second kind are presented in the following two relations (see [14] (Theorem 4.1, p. 59))
T 2 n ( x ) = T n ( 2 x 2 1 ) ,
2 ( 1 x 2 ) U n 2 ( x ) = 1 T 2 n + 2 ( x ) .
Using relations (15) and (17) we get
S 2 n + 1 ( x ) = k = 0 n ( 2 n 2 k + 2 ) 2 R 2 n 2 k + 1 1 2 , 1 2 1 + x 2 2 = k = 0 n ( 2 n 2 k + 2 ) 2 x + 1 2 R n k 1 2 , 1 2 ( x ) 2 = k = 0 n 2 ( x + 1 ) U n k ( x ) 2 = k = 0 n 1 1 x 1 T 2 n 2 k + 2 ( x ) = k = 0 n 1 T 2 k + 2 ( x ) 1 x .
From relations (16) and (17) it follows
S 2 n ( x ) = k = 0 n U 2 n 2 k 1 + x 2 2 = k = 0 n 1 1 x 1 T 4 n 4 k + 2 1 + x 2 = k = 0 n 1 T 2 n 2 k + 1 ( x ) 1 x = k = 0 n 1 T 2 k + 1 ( x ) 1 x .
Using the equalities
k = 0 n T 2 k + 1 ( x ) = 1 2 U 2 n + 1 ( x ) , k = 0 n T 2 k ( x ) = 1 2 1 + U 2 n ( x ) ,
we obtain, after a straight forward computation:
S 2 n + 1 ( x ) = k = 0 n 1 T 2 k + 2 ( x ) 1 x = 1 1 x n + 1 k = 0 n T 2 k + 2 ( x ) = 1 1 x n + 1 k = 1 n + 1 T 2 k ( x ) = 1 1 x n + 2 k = 0 n + 1 T 2 k ( x ) = 1 2 ( 1 x ) 2 n + 3 U 2 n + 2 ( x ) ,
S 2 n ( x ) = k = 0 n 1 T 2 k + 1 ( x ) 1 x = 1 1 x n + 1 k = 0 n T 2 k + 1 ( x ) = 1 2 ( 1 x ) 2 n + 2 U 2 n + 1 ( x ) .
Therefore
S n ( x ) = 1 2 ( 1 x ) [ n + 2 U n + 1 ( x ) ] .
Theorem 2.
Let P n be the Legendre polynomial of degree n , n N . Then, for x ( 1 , 1 )
2 π n + 1 2 + 1 8 n n + 1 U n ( x ) < 1 P n ( x ) < 1 π n + 1 4 + 1 46 n n + 1 U n ( x ) ,
where U n is the Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind.
Proof. 
Using the relation (see [18] (p. 713))
k = 0 n P k ( α , 0 ) ( x ) = k = 0 [ n 2 ] ( 1 2 ) k ( α + 2 2 ) n k ( α + 3 2 ) n 2 k ( n 2 k ) ! k ! ( α + 3 2 ) n k ( α + 1 2 ) n 2 k ( α + 1 ) n 2 k C n 2 k ( α + 1 2 ) 1 + x 2 2 ,
we get
k = 0 n P k ( 1 , 0 ) ( x ) = k = 0 n 2 ( 1 2 ) k ( 3 2 ) n k k ! ( 2 ) n k C n 2 k ( 1 ) 1 + x 2 2 = k = 0 n 2 B n , k C n 2 k ( 1 ) 1 + x 2 2 .
The Jacobi polynomials P n ( α , β ) , n N , α > 1 , β > 1 verify the following equality (see [14] ((4.5.4), p. 71)):
P n ( α + 1 , β ) ( x ) = 2 2 n + α + β + 2 · 1 1 x · ( n + α + 1 ) P n ( α , β ) ( x ) ( n + 1 ) P n + 1 ( α , β ) ( x ) .
From relations (5), (18) and (19) we obtain
1 P n + 1 ( x ) 1 x = k = 0 n 2 B n , k U n 2 k 1 + x 2 2 .
Using relation (11), we get
α n k = 0 n 2 U n 2 k 1 + x 2 2 < k = 0 n 2 B n , k U n 2 k 1 + x 2 2 < γ n k = 0 n 2 U n 2 k 1 + x 2 2 .
Therefore,
α n S n < 1 P n + 1 ( x ) 1 x < γ n S n .
Consequently,
α n 1 2 n + 1 U n ( x ) < 1 P n ( x ) < γ n 1 2 n + 1 U n ( x ) ,
and the Theorem is proved. □
Example 1.
Let u n ( x ) : = 2 n + 1 U n ( x ) π n + 1 2 + 1 8 n , v n ( x ) : = n + 1 U n ( x ) π n + 1 4 + 1 46 n . In Figure 1 are given the graphics of the polynomial 1 P n ( x ) and the lower and the upper bounds of it obtained in Theorem 2.

4. Bounds for Information Potentials

Let p ( x ) = p k ( x ) k 0 be a parameterized discrete probability distribution. The associated information potential is defined by
S ( x ) = k = 0 p k 2 ( x ) , x T , where I is a real interval .
The Rényi entropy of order 2 and the Tsallis entropy of order 2 associated with p ( t , x ) can be expressed in terms of the information potential S ( x ) as follows (see [18] (pp. 20–21)):
R ( x ) : = log S ( x ) ; T ( x ) = 1 S ( x ) .
In the following, we consider the binomial distribution p n , k [ 1 ] , the Poisson distribution p n , k [ 0 ] and the negative binomial distribution p n , k [ 1 ] :
p n , k [ 1 ] ( x ) = n k x k ( 1 x ) n k , x [ 0 , 1 ] , p n , k [ 0 ] ( x ) = e n x ( n x ) k k ! , x 0 , p n , k [ 1 ] ( x ) = n + k 1 k x k ( 1 + x ) n k , x 0 .
The associated information potentials (index of coincidence) of this distributions are defined as follows:
S n , 1 ( x ) : = k = 0 n n k x k ( 1 x ) n k 2 , x [ 0 , 1 ] ,
S n , 0 ( x ) : = e 2 n x k = 0 ( n x ) 2 k k ! 2 , x 0 ,
S n , 1 ( x ) : = k = 0 n + k 1 k x k ( 1 + x ) n k 2 , x 0 .
From [10] (56) and [12] (21) we know that
S n , 1 ( x ) = 1 2 k = 0 n B n 1 , k ( 1 2 x ) 2 k , S n + 1 , 1 ( x ) = 1 2 k = 0 n 1 B n 1 , k ( 1 + 2 x ) 2 k 1 .
The following lower and upper bounds for the information potential associated to binomial distribution was obtained in [11]:
1 + ( n 3 ) x ( 1 x ) 2 n n 3 S n , 1 ( x ) 1 1 + 4 ( n 1 ) x ( 1 x ) .
Using Remark 1 can be obtained new bounds for the information potential S n , 1 and S n , 1 as follows:
Theorem 3.
The following inequalities are satisfied
1 π n + 1 2 + 1 8 n 1 ( 1 2 x ) 2 n + 2 2 x ( 1 x ) < S n , 1 ( x ) < 1 π n + 1 4 + 1 46 n 1 ( 1 2 x ) 2 n + 2 4 x ( 1 x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] ,
1 π n + 1 2 + 1 8 n 1 + 2 x 2 x ( 1 + x ) 1 1 ( 1 + 2 x ) 2 n < S n + 1 , 1 ( x )
< 1 π n + 1 4 + 1 46 n 1 + 2 x 4 x ( 1 + x ) 1 1 ( 1 + 2 x ) 2 n , x > 0 .
Remark 2.
Let n = 10 . In Figure 2 we give a graphical representation of the lower bound of S n , 1 ( x ) from (24) and (25), respectively. Denote these bounds with LS(24) and LS(25), respectively. In Figure 3 we give a graphical representation of the upper bound of S n , 1 ( x ) from (24) and (25), respectively. Denote these bounds with RS(24) and RS(25), respectively. Remark that on certain intervals the results obtained in Theorem 3 improve the result from [11].

5. Conclusions

This paper is devoted to the orthogonal polynomials. Bounds of Legendre polynomials are obtained in terms of inequalities. A more general result in regard with the estimate of the coefficients B n , k is obtained and used in order to give bounds of information potentials associated of the binomial distribution and the negative binomial distribution. The bounds of the entropies are useful especially when they are described by complicated expressions. The results obtained in this paper improve some results from the literature. Motivated by many applications of entropies in secure data transmission, speech coding, cryptography, algorithmic complexity theory, finding such bounds for the entropies will be a topic for future work.

Author Contributions

These authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Project financed by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu & Hasso Plattner Foundation research grants LBUS-IRG-2019-05.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very greateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Manko, V.I.; Markovich, L.A. Entropic Inequalities and Properties of Some Special Functions. J. Russ. Laser Res. 2014, 35, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Koornwinder, T.; Kostenko, A.; Teschl, G. Jacobi polynomials, Bernstein-type inequalities and dispersion estimates for the discrete Laguerre operator. Adv. Math. 2018, 333, 796–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gonska, H.; Rasa, I.; Rusu, M.D. Chebyshev–Grüss-type inequalities via discrete oscillations. Buletinul Academiei de Stiinte a Republicii Moldova. Matematica 2014, 1, 63–89. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gavrea, I.; Ivan, M. On a conjecture concerning the sum of the squared Bernstein polynomials. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 241, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nikolov, G. Inequalities for ultraspherical polynomials. Proof of a conjecture of I. Raşa. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2014, 418, 852–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shannon, C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rényi, A. On measures of information and entropy. In Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics and Probability 1960, Berkeley, CA, USA, 20 June–30 July 1960; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1961; pp. 547–561. [Google Scholar]
  8. Acu, A.M.; Başcanbaz-Tunca, G.; Raşa, I. Information potential for some probability density functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2021, 389, 125578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Raşa, I. Convexity Properties of Some Entropies (II). Results Math. 2019, 74, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raşa, I. Entropies and Heun functions associated with positive linear operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 268, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bărar, A.; Mocanu, G.R.; Raşa, I. Bounds for some entropies and special functions. Carpathian J. Math. 2018, 34, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  12. Barar, A.; Mocanu, G.; Rasa, I. Heun functions related to entropies. RACSAM 2019, 113, 819–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Askey, R.; Gasper, G. Positive Jacobi polynomial sums. Am. J. Math. 1976, 98, 709–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Szegö, G. Orthogonal Polynomials; Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq, Pub.; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 1967; Volume 23. [Google Scholar]
  15. Available online: https://dlmf.nist.gov/18 (accessed on 12 November 2020).
  16. Toth, L. On the Wallis formula Mat. Lapok (Cluj) 1993, 4, 128–130. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. Spavochnik po Spetsial’nym Funktsiyam s Formulami, Grafikami, Matematicheskimi Tablitsami (Hanbook of Mathematical Function with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables); Nouka: Moskova, Russia, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  18. Principe, J.C. Information Theoretic Learning. Renyi’s Entropy and Kernel Perspectives; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Graphs of u n , v n and 1 P n .
Figure 1. Graphs of u n , v n and 1 P n .
Mathematics 08 02044 g001
Figure 2. Graphs of lower bounds of S n , 1 .
Figure 2. Graphs of lower bounds of S n , 1 .
Mathematics 08 02044 g002
Figure 3. Graphs of upper bounds of S n , 1 .
Figure 3. Graphs of upper bounds of S n , 1 .
Mathematics 08 02044 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sofonea, F.; Ţincu, I. On an Inequality for Legendre Polynomials. Mathematics 2020, 8, 2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112044

AMA Style

Sofonea F, Ţincu I. On an Inequality for Legendre Polynomials. Mathematics. 2020; 8(11):2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sofonea, Florin, and Ioan Ţincu. 2020. "On an Inequality for Legendre Polynomials" Mathematics 8, no. 11: 2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112044

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop