Abstract
This paper presents a self contained approach to the theory of convolution operators on locally compact groups (both commutative and non commutative) based on the use of the Figà–Talamanca Herz algebras. The case of finite groups is also considered.
1. Introduction
A p-convolution operator T on a locally compact group G is a continuous linear operator of such that T commutes with left translations. The set of all p-convolution operators is denoted If G is abelian, is isomorphic to moreover, We show, using the Figà–Talamanca Herz algebra that the relation also holds for amenable G (Theorem 17). A more general statement is obtained for non-amenable groups (Theorem 18).
Every bounded function on a LCA can be recovered from his spectrum (Corollary 4). To every , we associate a closed subset of G called the support of Then, using once again the algebra we show that T can be recovered from the support of T if G is amenable (Theorem 13). We obtain therefore a kind of harmonic analysis of p-convolutions operators strongly similar to the harmonic analysis of bounded functions on LCA.
2. Convolution Operators. The Fourier Transform of a Convolution Operator
In the following, G is a locally compact group. For , we put
for we also put
We choose a left invariant Haar measure on We recall that is a positive Radon measure, with ,
for every and for every We set
Definition 1.
Let G be a locally compact group and . A bounded linear operator T of ( such that for every and for every , is said to be a “p-convolution operator of the group G”. The set of all p-convolution operators of G is denoted .
Let be a bounded Radon measure on G (). We put
for every , more explicitly
for every . Recall that and that
for every We have and
where denotes the norm of every Observe that
We also have
the map is a faithful representation of G into . This representation is called the right-regular representation of G, and is denoted .
We have
Consider indeed defined by for and with . Then, the map belongs to (see Titchmarsh [1] Theorem A page 321) but
If a locally compact group G contains an infinite abelian subgroup, then
Let be the Pontrjagin dual of a locally compact abelian group G. For , we put
For , we set ; more explicitly, for every , we have
There is a unique Haar measure on , denoted , such that, for every with , we have
for every
The map is a linear isometry of into . We denote by his continuous extension to We recall (Plancherel theorem) that is a Banach isometry of onto Precisely, for , denotes the set of all with almost everywhere.
Observe that for an arbitrary locally compact group, with the composition of operators, as a product, is a unital Banach algebra:
the identity operator I is the unit. Moreover, is an involution of , we have .
Theorem 1.
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. We put for
for every Then, is an involutive Banach algebra isometry of onto
The main difficulty is to verify that the above map is surjective. This is a consequence of the following statement (spectral theorem): let be a bounded linear map of such that for every and for every then there is such that for every For details, see [2] page 13.
Corollary 1.
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. Then, is a commutative Banach algebra.
The following result is straightforward.
Let G be a general locally compact group (not necessarily commutative), and . Then, if and only if
for every and for every .
We are going to show that. for an abelian locally compact group, we have
(for every ) and the corresponding inequality for the norms
Theorem 2.
Let G be a locally compact abelian group, and . For every , we have and
Proof.
(1) For every , we have and
Letting we verify that
for every
We have
However, using strongly the commutativity of G, we get
Therefore,
We choose now and and obtain
which implies
(2) It suffices to show that, for , we have and
Suppose . Put
We have
According to (1)
By Riesz–Thorin, we get and
For , we proceed similarly. □
Remark 1.
Even though we use in a very strong way the commutativity of this theorem extends toarbitrary locally compact amenable groups.This is shown in Section 5. We recall that a locally compact group G is said to be amenable if there is a linear functional on the vector space of all continuous bounded complex valued functions on G such that if and for every (see [3] Chapter 8 § 5).
Definition 2.
The unique bounded operator S of with for every is denoted .
Theorem 3.
Let G be a locally compact abelian group and . Then, is a contractive monomorphism of the Banach algebra into the Banach algebra . For every , we have
Definition 3.
For every , we put , is called the“Fourier Transform of T”.
The Banach algebra is directly related to the -Theory of Fourier series of n variables.
For , we put
Let K be a compact neighborhood of 0 in . For and , we put
For is the Fourier sum of order
Theorem 4.
Let K be a compact convex neighborhood of 0 in and The following statements are equivalent.
- (1)
- for every
- (2)
- There is a unique with
According to Marcel Riesz [4] for every and every Consequently, for every interval I of , there is with It is not difficult to deduce from this that, for , for every convex polyhedral set C of and for every there is with
Let D be the unit ball of for According to Laurent Schwartz [5] and Charles Fefferman [6] for every with there is no with . In [5] Schwartz proved that for
there no with
For a detailed exposition of Fefferman’s result, see [7] Chap. 10, Section 10.1, pages 734–744.
3. The Figà-Talamanca Herz algebra , the dual of
Definition 4.
Let G be a locally compact group and . We denote by the set of all pairs where is a sequence of and is a sequence of with
Definition 5.
We denote by the set
For , we put
Theorem 5.
Let G be a locally compact group and . Then:
- (1)
- is a linear subspace of
- (2)
- is a norm on with respect to this norm is a Banach space. For every , we have
- (3)
- is dense in
Definition 6.
Let G be a abelian locally compact group. For every , we put
for every
Theorem 6.
Let G be an abelian locally compact group. Then, is a involutive Banach algebra for the complex conjugation and the pointwise product. The map is an involutive isometric isomorphism of the Banach algebra onto For every , there is with and
Remark 2.
The functions are not unique. They are obtained in a canonical way, using the map of page 2 (see [2] page 40).
We present now a generalization of the first part of Theorem 6, to every and to every locally compact group.
Theorem 7.
Let G be a locally compact group and . For the pointwise product and the complex conjugation, is an involutive Banach algebra.
Proof.
Consider For every put , and We have
and
But
We have moreover
and
and consequently
Let We know that thus
But for every we have
and therefore
□
Remark 3.
This result is due to Carl Herz. For details, generalizations and references, see ([2] pages 41–44). This proof is based on the use of Bochner integral.
Definition 7.
Let G be a locally compact group and . The involutive Banach algebra (see Definitions 4 and 5; see also Theorems 5 and 7) is called the Figà–Talamanca Herz algebra of
We show that the dual of is for a large class of locally compact groups G including the amenable groups.
Definition 8.
Let G be a locally compact group and . The topology on associated to the family of seminorms
with is called the “ultraweak topology”.
Remark 4.
This topology is locally convex and Hausdorff.
Definition 9.
Let G be a locally compact group and . The closure of in with respect to the ultraweak topology, is denoted . Every element of is called a “p-pseudomeasure”.
Remark 5.
1. for every locally compact group G and for every
2. for every locally compact group G. This is a consequence of a deep result of Jacques Dixmier (1952) [8]. We present a self-contained proof of this result for unimodular groups in [2] (Section 2.3 Theorem 5 page 32).
3. for every amenable locally compact group G and for every
4. for every , for a large class of nonamenable locally compact groups including and (Michael Cowling, (1998)).
5. It is unknown whether for every and for every locally compact group
Lemma 1.
Let G be a locally compact group, , , with
Then,
where
This Lemma permits writing the following definition.
Definition 10.
Let G be a locally compact group and . For every , we put
for every and for every with
We are now able to give a description of the dual of
Theorem 8.
(Eymard, Figà–Talamanca, Herz) Let G be a locally compact group and Then:
- 1.
- is a conjugate linear isometry of onto .
- 2.
- for every where and .
- 3.
- is an homeomorphism of with the ultraweak topology, onto , with the weak topology
See [2] Section 4.1 Theorem 6 pages 49–51.
We now define a pairing between and
Definition 11.
Let G be a locally compact group and For every and and for every , we put
for every such that
Remark 6.
The map is a sesquilinear form on
Corollary 2.
Let G be a locally compactabeliangroup. Then:
- 1.
- see [2] Section 4.2 Theorem 1 page 52. This is obtained without using [8].
- 2.
- For , the pairing is the concrete pairing . The precise relation between these pairings isfor every and for every
- 3.
- We also get the following important complement to Theorem 1: the map is an homeomorphism of with the topology onto with the ultraweak topology.
- 4.
- For every there is a net of trigonometric polynomials such that with respect to the topology and such that for every
- 5.
- For every , there is a net of integrable functions on G such that with respect to the topology and such that for every
- 6.
- We finally obtain a complement to Theorem 3. For every , we have and for every Moreover, for every , we also have
We give some hints for the proof of 6. (see [2] Section 4.2 Theorem 7 page 55).
Proof.
Let u be an element of . According to Theorem 6, there is with For every , we put
Using the bounded weak topology (N. Dunford and J. T. Schwartz, Linear Operators. Part I, page 428), we obtain the existence of with for every This implies and therefore with □
Proposition 1.
Let G be a locally compact group, U a neighborhood of and Then, there is and V neighborhood of a such that:
- 1.
- for every
- 2.
- on
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Remark 7.
We refer to [2] Section 4.3 Proposition 3 page 58. For G abelian and the classical proof uses in a very strong way the amenability of G ([3] Chapter 5, Section 2. 3. (ii) page 114). Consequently, from point of view of the Figà–Talamanca Herz algebra every locally compact group is amenable! We are more explicit below.
A consequence of this is the fact that holomorphic functions operate on
Theorem 9.
Let G be a locally compact group, K a compact subset of and an holomorphic function on an open neighborhood U of in Then, there is with for every
We need the following corollary.
Corollary 3.
Let G be a locally compact group, and K a compact subset of Suppose that for every Then, there is such that for every
4. The Spectrum of a Bounded Function, the Support of a Convolution Operator
Definition 12.
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. We denote by the canonical map of G into
Definition 13.
Let G be a locally compact abelian group and We call “spectrum of u”the set of all such that belongs to the closure of
in with respect to the topology This set is denoted
Using the bipolar theorem, it is not difficult to obtain the following two characterizations of the spectrum of
Proposition 2.
Let G be a locally compact abelian group, and Then, the following properties are equivalent:
- 1.
- 2.
- For every with we have
- 3.
- For every open neighborhood W of x there is with and
We intend to recover (“spectral synthesis problem”) every from . The subject of harmonic analysis of bounded functions is not very old, see A. Zygmund [9] vol. II page 335, Notes of Chap. XVI. For , the above definition (property 2. of the Proposition 2) of the spectrum is from 1953 [10].
In fact, we want to do much more.
Definition 14.
Let G be an arbitrary locally compact group, and We call “support of the convolution operator T”, the set of all such that, for every neighborhood U of e and for every neighborhood V of x, there is with and The support of T is denoted
We try to recover every from
This set is closed. For , we easily have Using Condition 3 above, it is not difficult to verify that for G abelian for every Using the duality of with (Section 3, Theorem 8), we at first obtain a generalization of Property 3.
Theorem 10.
Let G be an arbitrary locally compact group, and Then, if and only if for every open neighborhood V of x there is with and
Proof.
Suppose that for every open neighborhood Z of x there is with and We prove that Let open subsets of G with and Let W an open neighborhood of x relatively compact with Choose with and with Put There is such that There is also with and
for every Then, and
From , we get consequently, with and □
It is also possible to generalize Property 2. To achieve this goal, we have to introduce on a structure of left normed -module: . We give some hints on the definition of
For , and there is a unique bounded operator of , denoted such that
for every We have Then, for , we put for every such that . See [2] Chapter 5 for a detailed exposition.
If G is abelian for and , we have
Consequently, is a smoothing of We can also consider as a non commutative smoothing of T: for and we always have ([2] Section 5.2 Theorem 7 page 73). Moreover, for every and , we have .
Using the Corollary 3 of Section 3 and this structure of left normed -module on , we get the following statement ( [2] Section 6.2 Theorem 2 page 89).
Theorem 11.
Let G be an arbitrary locally compact group, and Then, we have
Then, the following extension of Property 2. to all locally compact groups is verified.
Theorem 12.
Let G be an arbitrary locally compact group, and Then, if and only if for every with , we have
We can now make Remark 7 of Section 3 more precise: there is always such that for every and every For of a locally compact amenable group see [3] Ch. 8 § 5.4. page 179.
Suppose G amenable. Then, every is the limit of a concrete net of compact p-convolution operators with respect to the ultraweak topology. For G abelian every is the weak limit of an explicit net of bounded functions having compact spectrum.
Theorem 13.
Let G be a locally compact amenable group, , and U a neighborhood of Then, there is a net of such that
- 1.
- ultraweakly.
- 2.
- for every
- 3.
- for every
The proof of this result ([2] Section 6.5 Corollary 4 page 98) shows that the construction of the approximating net is explicit.
We can now improve Assertion 5 of Corollary 2.
Corollary 4.
Let G be a locally compact abelian group, and U a neighborhood of Then, there is a net of such that
- 1.
- with respect to the topology
- 2.
- for every
- 3.
- for every
For many locally compact groups including the group of symmetries of the plane and the Heisenberg group of real matrices, we can improve the Theorem 13 (and consequently Corollary 4).
Theorem 14.
Let G one the groups or and U a neighborhood of Then, there is a net of finitely supported measures on G such that
- 1.
- ultraweakly.
- 2.
- for every
- 3.
- for every
For more on Theorem 14, see [11].
Remark 8.
It isnotpossible to replace U by in Theorem 13 and U by in Corollary 4. A similar improvement is also excluded for Theorem 14.
5. as a Subspace of
We extend to amenable groups the relations (see Theorem 3) and (see point 6. of Corollary 2).
Let be a positive Radon measure on a locally compact Hausdorff space X, a complex Hilbert space and To every we associate the unique bounded operator, denoted of such that for every and every
Theorem 15.
Let μ be a positive Radon measure on a locally compact Hausdorff space X, a nonzero complex Hilbert space and Then, the map is a linear isometry of into
For the proof and classical motivations, see [2] Chap. 8, Section 8.1, pages 145–150. Using Theorem 15, we obtain a generalization of Theorem 3 to all locally compact groups.
Theorem 16.
Let G be a locally compact group, and Then:
- 1.
- 2.
Proof.
We need some notations.
For , we set for every
For , we put for every
For and we denote by the map of G into defined by
We denote by the subspace of all maps f of G into for which is negligible.
For , we finally denote by the element of where for every
Consider and We have
where and We refer to [2] Section 8.2 Theorem 4 page 155 for the proof of this relation. Theorem 15 implies that
and, consequently,
Let There is with and
and, therefore,
To finish the proof, it suffices to verify that, for and , we have
Let There exist sequences and of with and
We finally obtain
□
As a corollary, we get for amenable groups the inclusion of in . This result is due to Herz and Rivire [12].
Corollary 5.
Let G be an amenable locally compact group, and Then:
- 1.
- 2.
Proof.
Let with and Using the amenability of G, we can find (see [2] Section 5.4 Lemma 1 page 80) with and
Using Theorem 16, we obtain
□
Definition 15.
Let G be a locally compact group and We denote by the set of all such that:
- 1.
- for every
- 2.
- There is with for every
Lemma 2.
Let G be a locally compact group and Then:
- 1.
- is a sub algebra of
- 2.
- 3.
Lemma 3.
Let G be a locally compact group and For every there is a unique such that for every We have
Definition 16.
Let G be a locally compact group, and S as in Lemma 3. We put
Lemma 4.
Let G be a locally compact group and Then:
- 1.
- is an injective homomorphism of the algebra into
- 2.
- for every
We now generalize Theorem 3 to the class of amenable groups.
Theorem 17.
Let G be an amenable locally compact group and Then:
- 1.
- is contractive Banach algebra monomorphism of into
- 2.
- for every
Remark 9.
Even fora finite group, Statement 2 is not trivial!
Theorem 18.
Let G be a locally compact group, and Then, and
Proof.
Let with For every , we put
for (see Definition 10). As in the proof of Point 6 of Corollary 2, we get the existence of such that for every This implies and consequently □
We finally generalize Point 6 of Corollary 2 to the class of amenable groups.
Theorem 19.
Let G be an amenable locally compact group and Then:
- 1.
- 2.
- For every one has
Proof.
Let u be an element of Choose such that For every , we put
There is such that for every This implies and consequently with □
The inclusion of into for G abelian is a consequence of the relation
for every and the Riesz–Thorin interpolation theorem. For the dihedral group , there is [13] such that
Herz [14] obtained the same statement for every finite nonabelian group. We could prove this for all locally compact groups containing such a subgroup. For specific non-amenable groups, more precise results have been obtained. In [15], Lohou constructed, for any a positive measure on , which convolves but does not convolve any other Consequently, for every with there is a positive measure which convolves but not
To obtain the inclusion for amenable nonabelian groups, we need substitutes to the relation Two results are necessary. The first is Theorem 15. This result seems to be an innocuous Banach space property! This theorem requires the use of random variables. It is another formulation of a result due to Marcinkiewics and Zygmund [16]. This permitted them to solve a famous problem raised by Paley. Observe that, in the formulation of Theorem 15, random variables do not appear. Nevertheless, the proof requires them!
The second tool, needed to prove the inclusion of into for amenable groups, is Theorem 16. In fact, it permits to obtain much more. We put, for an arbitrary locally compact group the following definition
and we also set for every
Then, Theorem 18 implies that and that
for every Hence, the coefficients of the regular representation in and of the regular representation in belong to It is a general fact: the coefficients of any bounded representation of G in a Banach space belong to
We finally improve Theorem 19, obtaining relations between and for arbitrary
Theorem 20.
Let G be a locally compact unimodular amenable group and Suppose or . Then, and Moreover, we have the following two inequalities:
- (1)
- for every
- (2)
- for every
Proof.
(1) We show that for every
Let be the set and the set For every and every , we have For every , we put
Suppose that
Choosing , we get
Let we have with and . Riesz–Thorin’s theorem implies and
Then, Theorem 17 implies
and, finally, If , we proceed similarly.
(2) We have and for every
Suppose at first We have and
and, consequently,
Suppose now that u is an arbitrary element of .
There is a sequence of such that The sequence is Cauchy in the space being complete, the function u belongs to and .
(3) We have and for every
Let T be a convolution operator of For every , we put and we have . This implies with □
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Titchmarsh, E.C. Reciprocal formulae involving series and integrals. Math. Zeit. 1926, 25, 321–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derighetti, A. Convolution Operators on Groups, Lecture Notes of the Unione Matematica Italiana 11; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Reiter, H. Classical Harmonic Analysis and Locally Compact Groups, Oxford Mathematical Monographs; Oxford at the Clarendon Press: Wotton-under-Edge, UK, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Riesz, M. Sur les fonctions conjuguées. Math. Zeit. 1927, 27, 218–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwartz, L. Sur les multiplicateurs de FLp. Proc. R. Physiog. Soc. Lund. 1953, 22, 124–128, See also L. Schwartz, Oeuvres Scientifiques (I), Documents Mathématiques 9, pp. 347–351. Société Mathématique de France (2011). [Google Scholar]
- Fefferman, C. The multiplier problem for the ball. Ann. Math. 1971, 94, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grafakos, L. Classical and Modern Fourier Operators; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Dixmier, J. Alge‘bres quasi-unitaires. Comment. Math. Helv. 1952, 26, 275–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zygmund, A. Trigonometric Series. Volume II; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Pollard, H. The harmonic analysis of bounded functions. Duke Math. J. 1953, 20, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delmonico, C. Atomization Process for convolution operators on locally compact groups. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2006, 134, 3231–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herz, C.; Rivie‘re, N. Estimates for translation-invariant operators on spaces with mixed norms. Stud. Math. XLIV 1972, 44, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Oberlin, D.M. Mp(G) ≠ Mq(G)(p−1 + q−1 = 1). Israel J. Math. 1975, 22, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herz, C. On the Asymmetry of Norms of Convolution Operators, I. J. Funct. Anal. 1976, 23, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lohoué, N. Estimations Lp des coefficients de représentations et opérateurs de convolution. Adv. Math. 1980, 38, 178–221. [Google Scholar]
- Marcinkiewics, J.; et Zygmund, A. Quelques inégalités pour les opérations linéaires. Fund. Math. 1939, 32, 115–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).