Abstract
In this paper, we introduced some new integral inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for functions whose second derivatives in absolute values at certain powers are strongly -convex functions via the Katugampola fractional integrals.
Keywords:
Hermite–Hadamard type inequality; strongly η-convex functions; Hölder’s inequality; Power mean inequality; Katugampola fractional integrals; Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals; Hadamard fractional integrals 2010 MSC:
26A33; 26A51; 26D10; 26D15
1. Introduction
Let I be an interval in . A function is said to be convex on I if
for all and . The following inequalities which hold for convex functions is known in the literature as the Hermite–Hadamard type inequality.
Theorem 1
([1]). If is convex on with , then
Many authors have studied and generalized the Hermite–Hadamard inequality in several ways via different classes of convex functions. For some recent results related to the Hermite–Hadamard inequality, we refer the interested reader to the papers [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
In 2016, Gordji et al. [12] introduced the concept of -convexity as follows:
Definition 1
([12]). A function is said to be η-convex with respect to the bifunction if
for all and .
Remark 1.
If we take in Definition 1, then we recover the classical definition of convex functions.
In 2017, Awan et al. [13] extended the class of -convex functions to the class of strongly -convex functions as follows:
Definition 2
([13]). A function is said to be strongly η-convex with respect to the bifunction with modulus if
for all and .
Remark 2.
If in Definition 2, then we have the class of strongly convex functions.
For some recent results related to the class of -convex functions, we refer the interested reader to the papers [8,12,13,14,15,16].
Definition 3
([17]). The left- and right-sided Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals of order of f are defined by
and
with and is the gamma function given by
with the property that .
Definition 4
([18]). The left- and right-sided Hadamard fractional integrals of order of f are defined by
and
Definition 5.
denotes the space of all complex-valued Lebesgue measurable functions f for which , where the norm is defined by
and for
In 2011, Katugampola [19] introduced a new fractional integral operator which generalizes the Riemann–Liouville and Hadamard fractional integrals as follows:
Definition 6.
Let be a finite interval. Then, the left- and right-sided Katugampola fractional integrals of order of are defined by
and
with and , if the integrals exist.
Remark 3.
It is shown in [19] that the Katugampola fractional integral operators are well-defined on .
Theorem 2
([19]). Let and . Then for
- ,
- .
Similar results also hold for right-sided operators.
For more information about the Katugampola fractional integrals and related results, we refer the interested reader to the papers [19,20,21]. Recently, Chen and Katugampola [20] introduced several integral inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard type for functions whose first derivatives in absolute value are convex functions via the Katugampola fractional integrals. We present two of their results here for the purpose of our discussion. The first result of importance to us employs the following lemma.
Lemma 1
([20]). Let , and be a differentiable mapping on with . Then the following equality holds if the fractional integrals exist:
By using Lemma 1, the authors proved the following result.
Theorem 3
([20]). Let be a differentiable mapping on with . If is convex on , then the following inequality holds:
The second result of importance to us also uses the following lemma.
Lemma 2
([20]). Let , and be a differentiable mapping on with . Then the following equality holds if the fractional integrals exist:
By using Lemma 2, the authors proved the following result.
Theorem 4
([20]). Let be a differentiable mapping on with . If is convex on , then the following inequality holds:
Remark 4.
It is important to note that Lemmas 1 and 2 are corrected versions of [20] (Lemma 2.4 and Equation (14)).
Our purpose in this paper is to provide some new estimates for the right hand side of the inequalities in Theorems 3 and 4 for functions whose second derivatives in absolute value at some powers are strongly -convex.
2. Main Results
To prove the main results of this paper, we need the following lemmas which are extensions of Lemmas 1 and 2 for the second derivative case of the function f.
Lemma 3.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . Then the following equality holds if the fractional integrals exist:
Proof.
Lemma 4.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . Then the following equality holds if the fractional integrals exist:
Proof.
We are now in a position to prove our main results.
Theorem 5.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is strongly η-convex with modulus for , then the following inequality holds:
Proof.
Using Lemma 3, the well-known power mean inequality and the strong -convexity of , we obtain
The desired inequality follows from the above estimation and observing that:
This completes the proof of Theorem 5. □
Corollary 1.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is convex for , then the following inequality holds:
Proof.
The result follows directly from Theorem 5 if we take and . □
Theorem 6.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is strongly η-convex with modulus for , then the following inequalities hold:
where .
Proof.
Using Lemma 3, the Hölder’s inequality and the strong -convexity of , we obtain
This proves the first inequality. To prove the second inequality, we observe that for any and , we have . Thus, it follows that for all . Hence, we have that
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is convex for , then the following inequalities hold:
where.
Proof.
The result follows directly from Theorem 6 if we take and . □
Theorem 7.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is a strongly η-convex function on with modulus for , then the following inequality holds:
where denotes the beta function defined by .
Proof.
Using Lemma 4, the power mean inequality and the strong -convexity of , we obtain
The desired result follows from the above inequality and using the following computations:
and
This completes the proof of the theorem. □
Corollary 3.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is convex for , then the following inequality holds:
Proof.
The result follows directly from Theorem 7 if we take and . □
Theorem 8.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is a strongly η-convex function on with modulus for , then the following inequalities hold:
where .
Proof.
Using Lemma 4, the Hölder’s inequality and the strong -convexity of , we obtain
where
This proves the first inequality. Using a similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 6, we obtain
This completes the proof of the theorem. □
Corollary 4.
Let , and be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is convex for , then the following inequalities hold:
where .
Proof.
The result follows directly from Theorem 8 if we take and . □
3. Conclusions
Four main results related to the Hermite–Hadamard inequality via the Katugampola fractional integrals involving strongly -convex functions have been introduced. Similar results via the Riemann–Liouville and Hadamard fractional integrals could be derived as particular cases by taking and , respectively. Several other interesting results can be obtained by considering different bifunctions and/or the modulus as well as different values for the parameters and .
Author Contributions
S.K., E.R.N and A.M.T contributed equally to this work.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
We kindly appreciate the efforts of the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Hadamard, J. Etude sur les properties des fonctions entries et an particular d’une fonction considree par, Riemann. J. Math. Pures. Appl. 1893, 58, 171–215. [Google Scholar]
- Alomari, M.; Darus, M.; Dragomir, S.S. New inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard’s type for functions whose second derivatives absolute values are quasiconvex. Tamkang J. Math. 2010, 41, 353–359. [Google Scholar]
- Chun, L.; Qi, F. Integral inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard type for functions whose third derivatives are convex. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chun, L.; Qi, F. Integral inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard type for functions whose 3rd derivatives are s-convex. Appl. Math. 2012, 3, 1680–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomir, S.S. Two mappings in connection to Hadamard’s inequalities. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1992, 167, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomir, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P. Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and their applications to special means for real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 1998, 11, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farid, G.; Rehman, A.U.; Zahra, M. On Hadamard-type inequalities for k-fractional integrals. Konulrap J. Math. 2016, 4, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M.A.; Khurshid, Y.; Ali, T. Hermite–Hadamard inequality for fractional integrals via η-convex functions. Acta Math. Univ. Comen. 2017, LXXXVI (1), 153–164. [Google Scholar]
- Nwaeze, E.R. Inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for Quasi-convex functions via the (k,s)-Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. Fract. Differ. Calc. 2018, 8, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nwaeze, E.R.; Kermausuor, S.; Tameru, A.M. Some new k-Riemann–Liouville Fractional integral inequalities associated with the strongly η-quasiconvex functions with modulus μ≥0. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 2018, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Yaldiz, H.; Basak, N. Hermite–Hadamard’s inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57, 2403–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordji, M.E.; Delavar, M.R.; de la Sen, M. On φ-convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 2016, 10, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awan, M.U.; Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Safdar, F. On strongly generalized convex functions. Filomat 2017, 31, 5783–5790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordji, M.E.; Delavar, M.R.; Dragomir, S.S. Some inequalities related to η-convex functions. Preprint RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2015, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Gordji, M.E.; Dragomir, S.S.; Delavar, M.R. An inequality related to η-convex functions (II). Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 2015, 6, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
- Nwaeze, E.R.; Torres, D.F.M. Novel results on the Hermite–Hadamard kind inequality for h-convex funxtions by means of the (k, r)-fractional integral operators. In Advances in Mathematical Inequalities and Applications (AMIA); Trends in Mathematics; Dragomir, S.S., Agarwal, P., Jleli, M., Samet, B., Eds.; Birkhäuser: Singapore, 2018; pp. 311–321. [Google Scholar]
- Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations: Mathematics in Science and Engineering; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications; Gordon and Breach: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Katugampola, U.N. New approach to a generalized fractional integral. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Katugampola, U.N. Hermite–Hadamard and Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér type inequalities for generalized fractional integrals. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2017, 446, 1274–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katugampola, U.N. A new approach to generalized fractional derivatives. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 2014, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).