Abstract
In this paper, we discuss various estimates to the right-hand (resp. left-hand) side of the Hermite–Hadamard inequality for functions whose absolute values of the second (resp. first) derivatives to positive real powers are log-convex. As an application, we derive certain inequalities involving the q-digamma and q-polygamma functions, respectively. As a consequence, new inequalities for the q-analogue of the harmonic numbers in terms of the q-polygamma functions are derived. Moreover, several inequalities for special means are also considered.
1. Introduction
In recent years, because of the importance of the relationship between inequalities and convexity, the study of the Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality has attracted much attention due to applications of convex functions (for details see [1,2]).
A function is convex. Then, for , we have
A function is log-convex. Then, for and , we have
If the above inequality is reversed then f is called a log-concave function. It is also known that if g is differentiable, then f is log-convex (log-concave) if and only if is increasing (decreasing). It is easy to see this by the arithmetic-mean–geometric-mean (AM–GM) inequality
for all and , i.e., the set of log-convex functions is a proper subset of the class of convex functions.
The main idea of this paper is motivated by the above results. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we first present some lemmas which are used in the main results. Then, we present some estimates to the left-hand side and right-hand side of Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for functions whose absolute values of the first and second derivatives to positive real powers are log-convex. In Section 3, we derive some inequalities for q-digamma and q-polygamma functions by applying the main results of Section 2 and deducing some of them for the q-analogue harmonic numbers. Moreover, several inequalities for special means are derived. In Section 3, our aim is to apply the idea taken in the previous section for the q-digamma and q-polygamma functions and the classical Hermite–Hadamard inequalities (1). As applications, we show new lower and upper bounds for the q-analogue of the harmonic numbers in terms of the q-trigamma function. Moreover, some inequalities for the harmonic numbers and Euler–Mascheroni constant are presented.
2. Main Results
In this section, we establish our main results, but first we briefly recall some basic well-known results which will be used in the sequel.
Lemma 1
([3]). Let be a differentiable mapping on , with , then
Lemma 2
([4]). Let be a differentiable mapping on , with , then
Theorem 1.
Let be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is log-convex on , such that , and , then the inequality holds
where such that .
Proof.
Let and by means of Lemma 1 and known result [5] (p. 4), we have
where such that , we find that
Now, by using the following formula
with and in and , respectively, we get
and
Now, suppose that .
Next by considering the Hölder–Rogers inequality,
for , we get
Remark 1.
In the case when , the inequality (5) reduce to
A similar result is embodied in this theorem. The beta function and gamma function are defined by
The beta function satisfies the following properties:
In particular,
Theorem 2.
Let be a twice differentiable mapping on with . If is log-convex on , such that ,and , then
where and such that .
Proof.
By Lemma 1, we have
Since is convex on for all , we know that for any ,
So, by using the Hölder–Rogers inequality (9) and the arithmetic-mean–geometric-mean (AM–GM) inequality (6), we have
The desired inequality (13) is thus established. □
Remark 2.
If , for all . Assume that the hypotheses of the Theorem 2 are satisfied. Then in view of
and (13), we have
where and such that .
Theorem 3.
With the assumptions of Theorem 2, we have
where and is the incomplete gamma function
Proof.
From Lemma 1, Hölder’s inequality, and the AM–GM inequality (6), we get
On the other hand, by using the fact
we obtain
and
Remark 3.
If , then the inequality (19) reduces to the following inequality:
Moreover, in the case when , then
is true.
Theorem 4.
Let be a differentiable mapping on with . If is log-convex on , such that ,and , then
holds for all such that and .
Proof.
From Lemma 2, we get
On the other hand, by using the Hölder–Rogers inequality (9) and the AM–GM inequality (6), we obtain
Similarly, we get
which implies (19). □
Remark 4.
Theorem 5.
Let be a differentiable mapping on with . If is log-convex on , such that and , then
3. Applications
3.1. Applications to Special Means
Here, we demonstrate new inequalities connecting the above means for arbitrary real numbers.
- The arithmetic mean:
- The geometric mean:
- The logarithmic mean:
- The generalized logarithmic mean:
We use the following notations throughout this section:
Proposition 1.
Let be real numbers such that and , then the inequality holds
where
with .
Proof.
Apply and in Theorems 2 and 3. □
Proposition 2.
Let be a real number such that , and . Then, the inequality holds:
where
with .
Proof.
Apply in Theorems 2 and 3. □
3.2. Inequalities for Some Special Functions
Let , the q-digamma function , is the q-analogue of the psi or digamma function defined by
For and , the q-digamma function is defined by
In [6], it was shown that .
The nth derivative of the q-digamma function is called the q-polygamma function and can be defined as
We recall that a function f is said to be completely monotonic on an interval I, if f has derivatives of all orders on I and , for all and all integers . These functions have important applications in probability and numerical analysis.
Proposition 3.
Let be real numbers such that and . Then the following inequality
holds true for all and .
Proof.
By using the definition of the q-digamma function, we deduce that the q-trigamma function is a completely monotonic function on . This implies that the function is also completely monotonic on for each , and consequently is log-convex, since every completely monotonic function is log-convex, (see [7] (p. 167)). So, Theorem 2 completes the proof of Proposition 3. □
Proposition 4.
Let and . Then the inequality holds,
Proof.
The inequality (46) follows immediately from Theorem 5 when . □
As another application of inequality (46) we can provide the following inequalities for the q-triagamma and q-polygamma functions and the q-analogue of harmonic numbers defined by
So, in view of inequality (46) and using the equation
we obtain the following result.
Corollary 1.
Let and . Then, the following inequality
holds true.
Proposition 5.
Let n be a integer number. Then the inequality holds,
where is a harmonic number.
Proof.
By virtue of inequality (49) when , and using the relation
we obtain the desired result. □
Remark 6.
We conclude our investigation by applying the methods which were developed in Section 2, for the classical Hermite–Hadamard inequalities. Since the q-trigamma function is completely monotonic on for each , and consequently is convex on . Then we get
In particular, we obtain the following inequalities for the q-analogue of harmonic numbers
Letting , in the above inequalities, we obtain the new inequality for the harmonic number ,
Author Contributions
All authors contributed equally.
Funding
No specific funding was received for this project.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thanks to the worthy referees and editor for their valuable suggestions for our paper in Mathematics. This work was supported by under the first author research grant supported by SERB Project Number: MTR/2017/000194 and fourth author research grant supported by SERB Project Number: TAR/2018/000001
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Agarwal, P.; Dragomir, S.S.; Jleli, M.; Samet, B. Advances in Mathematical Inequalities and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mehrez, K.; Agarwal, P. New Hermite–Hadamard type integral inequalities for convex functions and their applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2019, 350, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarikaya, M.Z.; Saglam, A.; Yildirim, H. New inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard type for functions whose second derivatives absolute values are convex and quasi-convex. IJOPCM 2012, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirmaci, U.S.; Özdemir, M.E. Some inequalities for mappings whose derivatives are bounded and applications to special means of real numbers. Appl. Math. Lett. 2004, 17, 641–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitrinović, D.S. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Krattenthaler, C.; Srivastava, H.M. Summations for basic hypergeometric series involving a q-anologue of thedigamma function. Comput. Math. Appl. 1996, 32, 73–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widder, D.V. The Laplace Transform; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1941. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).