Next Article in Journal
An M[X]/G(a,b)/1 Queueing System with Breakdown and Repair, Stand-By Server, Multiple Vacation and Control Policy on Request for Re-Service
Next Article in Special Issue
Forecast-Triggered Model Predictive Control of Constrained Nonlinear Processes with Control Actuator Faults
Previous Article in Journal
Convergence in Total Variation to a Mixture of Gaussian Laws
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Strong Neighbor-Based Optimization for Distributed Model Predictive Control Systems

Model Predictive Control of Mineral Column Flotation Process

Key Laboratory of Advanced Process Control for Light Industry (Ministry of Education), Institute of Automation, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2V4, Canada
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2018, 6(6), 100;
Received: 28 April 2018 / Revised: 1 June 2018 / Accepted: 4 June 2018 / Published: 13 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Directions on Model Predictive Control)
Column flotation is an efficient method commonly used in the mineral industry to separate useful minerals from ores of low grade and complex mineral composition. Its main purpose is to achieve maximum recovery while ensuring desired product grade. This work addresses a model predictive control design for a mineral column flotation process modeled by a set of nonlinear coupled heterodirectional hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs) and ordinary differential equations (ODEs), which accounts for the interconnection of well-stirred regions represented by continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) and transport systems given by heterodirectional hyperbolic PDEs, with these two regions combined through the PDEs’ boundaries. The model predictive control considers both optimality of the process operations and naturally present input and state/output constraints. For the discrete controller design, spatially varying steady-state profiles are obtained by linearizing the coupled ODE–PDE model, and then the discrete system is obtained by using the Cayley–Tustin time discretization transformation without any spatial discretization and/or without model reduction. The model predictive controller is designed by solving an optimization problem with input and state/output constraints as well as input disturbance to minimize the objective function, which leads to an online-solvable finite constrained quadratic regulator problem. Finally, the controller performance to keep the output at the steady state within the constraint range is demonstrated by simulation studies, and it is concluded that the optimal control scheme presented in this work makes this flotation process more efficient. View Full-Text
Keywords: model predictive control; column flotation; coupled PDE–ODE; Cayley–Tustin discretization; input/state constraints model predictive control; column flotation; coupled PDE–ODE; Cayley–Tustin discretization; input/state constraints
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, Y.; Luan, X.; Liu, F.; Dubljevic, S. Model Predictive Control of Mineral Column Flotation Process. Mathematics 2018, 6, 100.

AMA Style

Tian Y, Luan X, Liu F, Dubljevic S. Model Predictive Control of Mineral Column Flotation Process. Mathematics. 2018; 6(6):100.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Yahui, Xiaoli Luan, Fei Liu, and Stevan Dubljevic. 2018. "Model Predictive Control of Mineral Column Flotation Process" Mathematics 6, no. 6: 100.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop