Abstract
The notions of hyperfuzzy ideals in -algebras are introduced, and related properties are investigated. Characterizations of hyperfuzzy ideals are established. Relations between hyperfuzzy ideals and hyperfuzzy subalgebras are discussed. Conditions for hyperfuzzy subalgebras to be hyperfuzzy ideals are provided.
1. Introduction
After Zadeh [1] has introduced the fundamental concept of fuzzy sets, several generalizations of fuzzy sets are achieved. As a generalization of fuzzy sets and interval-valued fuzzy sets, Ghosh and Samanta [2] introduced the notion of hyperfuzzy sets, and then they applied it to group theory. They defined hyperfuzzy (normal) subgroups and hyperfuzzy cosets, and investigated their properties. The hyperfuzzy set has a subset of the interval as its image. Hence, it is a generalization of an interval-valued fuzzy set. In mathematics, and -algebras are algebraic structures, introduced by Imai, Iseki and Tanaka, that describe fragments of the propositional calculus involving implication known as and logics (see [3,4,5]). Jun et al. [6] applied hyperfuzzy sets to -algebras by using the infimum and supremum of the image of hyperfuzzy sets. They introduced the notion of k-fuzzy substructure for and then they introduced the concepts of hyperfuzzy substructures of several types by using k-fuzzy substructures, and investigated their basic properties. They also introduced the notion of hyperfuzzy subalgebras of type for , and discussed relations between hyperfuzzy substructure/subalgebra and its length. They investigated the properties of hyperfuzzy subalgebras related to upper and lower level subsets.
The aim of this paper is to study -algebraic structures based on hyperfuzzy structures. So, the notions and results in this manuscript are a generalization of -algebraic structures based on fuzzy and interval-valued fuzzy structures. We introduce the notion of hyperfuzzy ideals in -algebras, and investigate several properties. We consider characterizations of hyperfuzzy ideals, and discuss relations between hyperfuzzy subalgebras and hyperfuzzy ideals. We provide conditions for hyperfuzzy subalgebras to be hyperfuzzy ideals.
2. Preliminaries
By a -algebra (see [7,8]) we mean a system in which the following axioms hold:
- (I)
- (II)
- (III)
- (IV)
for all If a -algebra X satisfies for all then we say that X is a -algebra (see [7,8]). We can define a partial ordering ≤ by
In a -algebra X, the following hold (see [7,8]):
A non-empty subset S of a -algebra X is called a subalgebra of X (see [7,8]) if for all .
We refer the reader to the books [7,8] for further information regarding -algebras.
By a fuzzy structure over a nonempty set X we mean an ordered pair of X and a fuzzy set on X.
Let X be a nonempty set. A mapping is called a hyperfuzzy set over X (see [2]), where is the family of all nonempty subsets of . An ordered pair is called a hyper structure over X.
Given a hyper structure over a nonempty set X, we consider two fuzzy structures and over X (see [6]) in which
Given a nonempty set X, let and denote the collection of all -algebras and all -algebras, respectively. Also .
Definition 1 ([6]).
For any , a fuzzy structure over is called a
- fuzzy subalgebra of with type 1 (briefly, 1-fuzzy subalgebra of ) if
- fuzzy subalgebra of with type 2 (briefly, 2-fuzzy subalgebra of ) if
- fuzzy subalgebra of with type 3 (briefly, 3-fuzzy subalgebra of ) if
- fuzzy subalgebra of with type 4 (briefly, 4-fuzzy subalgebra of ) if
It is clear that every 3-fuzzy subalgebra is a 1-fuzzy subalgebra and every 2-fuzzy subalgebra is a 4-fuzzy subalgebra.
Definition 2 ([6]).
For any and , a hyper structure over is called an -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of if is an i-fuzzy subalgebra of and is a j-fuzzy subalgebra of .
3. Hyperfuzzy Ideals
In what follows, let unless otherwise specified.
Definition 3.
A fuzzy structure over is called a
It is clear that every 3-fuzzy ideal is a 1-fuzzy ideal and every 2-fuzzy ideal is a 4-fuzzy ideal.
Definition 4.
For any , a hyper structure over is called an -hyperfuzzy ideal of if is an i-fuzzy ideal of and is a j-fuzzy ideal of .
Example 1.
Consider a -algebra with the binary operation * which is given in Table 1 (see [8]).
Table 1.
Cayley table for the binary operation “∗”.
(1) Let be a hyper structure over in which is given as follows:
It is routine to verify that is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
(2) Let be a hyper structure over in which is given as follows:
It is routine to verify that is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
Example 2.
Consider a -algebra with the binary operation * which is given in Table 2 (see [8]).
Table 2.
Cayley table for the binary operation “∗”.
(1) Let be a hyper structure over in which is given as follows:
By routine calculations, we know that is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
(2) Let be a hyper structure over in which is given as follows:
By routine calculations, we know that is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
Proposition 1.
Given a hyper structure over , we have the following assertions.
- (1)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then
- (2)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then
- (3)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then
- (4)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then
Proof.
Proposition 2.
Given a hyper structure over , we have the following assertions.
- (1)
- If is an -hyperfuzzy ideal of for , then
- (2)
- If is either a -hyperfuzzy ideal or a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the following assertion is valid.
- (3)
- If is either a -hyperfuzzy ideal or a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the following assertion is valid.
- (4)
- If is either a -hyperfuzzy ideal or a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the following assertion is valid.
- (5)
- If is either a -hyperfuzzy ideal or a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the following assertion is valid.
Proof.
We prove (1) only, Others can be verified by the similar way. If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then is a 2-fuzzy ideal of and is a 3-fuzzy ideal of . Let be such that . Then , and thus
by (10), (9), (11) and (7). Since and for all , it follows that and for all . Similarly, we can verify that (17) is true for . ☐
Proposition 3.
Given a hyper structure over , we have the following assertions.
- (1)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then
- (2)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then
- (3)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then
- (4)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then
Proof.
Proposition 4.
Given a hyper structure over , we have the following assertions.
- (1)
- If is an -hyperfuzzy ideal of for , then
- (2)
- If is either a -hyperfuzzy ideal or a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the following assertion is valid.
- (3)
- If is either a -hyperfuzzy ideal or a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the following assertion is valid.
- (4)
- If is either a -hyperfuzzy ideal or a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the following assertion is valid.
- (5)
- If is either a -hyperfuzzy ideal or a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the following assertion is valid.
Proof.
If is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then is a 2-fuzzy ideal of and is a 3-fuzzy ideal of . Let be such that . Then , and so
by (10) and (9), and
by (11) and (7). Since and for all , it follows that and . Similarly, we can verify that (26) is true for . Similarly, we can show that (2), (3), (4) and (5) are true. ☐
Given a hyper structure over X and , we consider the following sets:
Theorem 1.
(1) A hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of if and only if the sets and are either empty or ideals of X for all .
(2) A hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of if and only if the sets and are either empty or ideals of X for all .
(3) A hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of if and only if the sets and are either empty or ideals of X for all .
(4) A hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of if and only if the sets and are either empty or ideals of X for all .
Proof.
Assume that is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of and for . Then there exist and . Hence and , that is, . Let be such that and . Then and . It follows that
and so that . Thus is an ideal of . Now let be such that and . Then and , which imply that
Thus , and therefore is an ideal of .
Conversely, suppose that the sets and are either empty or ideals of X for all . For any , let and . Then , and so and are nonempty. Hence and are ideals of , and thus . It follows that and for all . Assume that there exist such that
If we take , then , and . Since is an ideal of X, we have , that is, . This is a contradiction, and so
for all . Now, suppose that
for some , and take
Then and , which imply that since is an ideal of X. Hence , which is a contradiction, and so
for all . Therefore is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of . Similarly, we can verify that (2), (3), and (4) hold. ☐
Theorem 2.
If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
Proof.
If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then is a 2-fuzzy ideal of X and is a 3-fuzzy ideal of . Let be such that and are nonempty. Then there exist such that and . Hence and , which imply that . Let be such that and . Then and . It follows from (10) that
and so that . Hence is an ideal of . Now let be such that and . Then and , which imply from (11) that
Thus , and therefore is an ideal of X. ☐
The following example shows that the converse of Theorem 2 is not true, that is, there exists a hyper structure over such that
- (1)
- is not a -hyperfuzzy ideal of ,
- (2)
- The nonempty sets and are ideals of for all .
Example 3.
Consider a -algebra with the binary operation * which is given in Table 3 (see [8]).
Table 3.
Cayley table for the binary operation “∗”.
Let be a hyper structure over in which is given as follows:
Then
and
Hence the nonempty sets and are ideals of for all . But is not a -hyperfuzzy ideal of since
and/or
Using the similar way to the proof of Theorem 2, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 3.
(1)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
(2)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
(3)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
Using the similar way to the proof of Theorems 1 and 2, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 4.
(1)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
(2)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
(3)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
(4)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
(5)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
(6)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
(7)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
(8)If a hyper structure over is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of , then the sets and are either empty or ideals of for all .
4. Relations between Hyperfuzzy Ideals and Hyperfuzzy Subalgebras
Theorem 5.
Let . For any , every -hyperfuzzy ideal is an -hyperfuzzy subalgebra.
Proof.
Let and let be a -hyperfuzzy ideal of . Then is a 1-fuzzy ideal of and is a 4-fuzzy ideal of . Since for all , it follows from Proposition 1, (8) and (12) that
for all . Therefore is a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of . Similarly, we can prove the result for . ☐
The converse of Theorem 5 is not true for as seen in the following example.
Example 4.
Consider a -algebra with the binary operation * which is given in Table 4 (see [8]).
Table 4.
Cayley table for the binary operation “∗”.
Let be a hyper structure over in which is given as follows:
It is routine to verify that is a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of . But it is not a -hyperfuzzy ideal of since .
Example 5.
Let be the -algebra in Example 1. Let be a hyper structure over in which is given as follows:
Then is a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of . Since
is not a 1-fuzzy ideal of X. Hence is not a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
Example 6.
Consider a -algebra with the binary operation * which is given in Table 5 (see [8]).
Table 5.
Cayley table for the binary operation “∗”.
(1) Let be a hyper structure over in which is given as follows:
Then is a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of . Since
and/or
is not a 4-fuzzy ideal of and/or is not a 1-fuzzy ideal of . Therefore is not a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
(2) Let be a hyper structure over in which is given as follows:
Then is a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of and is a 4-fuzzy ideal of . But is not a 4-fuzzy ideal of since
Hence is not a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
We provide conditions for a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra to be a -hyperfuzzy ideal.
Theorem 6.
For any , if a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of satisfies the condition (22), then is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
Proof.
Using the similar way to the proof of Theorem 6, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 7.
For any , we have the following assertions.
- (1)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of which satisfies the condition (23), then is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
- (2)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of which satisfies the condition (24), then is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
- (3)
- If is a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of which satisfies the condition (25), then is a -hyperfuzzy ideal of .
Theorem 8.
For any and , every -hyperfuzzy ideal is an -hyperfuzzy subalgebra.
Proof.
Let and let be a -hyperfuzzy ideal of . Then is a 2-fuzzy ideal of and is a 3-fuzzy ideal of . Since for all , we have
for all by Proposition 2, (9) and (7). Hence is a -hyperfuzzy subalgebra of . Similarly, we can prove it for .
Using the similar way to the proof of Theorems 5 and 8, we have the following theorem. ☐
Theorem 9.
For any , every -hyperfuzzy ideal is an -hyperfuzzy subalgebra for .
5. Conclusions
In the paper [2], Ghosh and Samanta have introduced the concept of hyperfuzzy sets as a generalization of fuzzy sets and interval-valued fuzzy sets, and have presented an application of hyperfuzzy sets in group theory. Jun et al. [6] have applied the hyperfuzzy sets to -algebras. In this article, we have discussed ideal theory in -algebras by using the hyperfuzzy sets, and have introduced the notion of hyperfuzzy ideals in -algebras, and have investigate several properties. We have considered characterizations of hyperfuzzy ideals, and have discussed relations between hyperfuzzy subalgebras and hyperfuzzy ideals. We have provided conditions for hyperfuzzy subalgebras to be hyperfuzzy ideals. Recently, many kinds of fuzzy sets have several applications to deal with uncertainties from our different kinds of daily life problems, in particular, for solving decision making problems (see [9,10,11,12,13]). In the future, we shall extend our proposed approach to some decision making problem under the field of fuzzy cluster analysis, decision-making, uncertain programming and mathematical programming [9]. Moreover, we will apply the notions and results in this manuscript to related algebraic structures, for example, -algebras, -algebras, -algebras, -algebras, effect algebras, and so on.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions. The first author, S. Z. Song, was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2016R1D1A1B02006812).
Author Contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly to the study and preparation of the article. They have read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 1965, 8, 338–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, J.; Samanta, T.K. Hyperfuzzy sets and hyperfuzzy group. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2012, 41, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
- Imai, Y.; Iséki, K. On axiom systems of propositional calculi. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 1966, 42, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iséki, K. An algebra related with a propositional calculus. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 1966, 42, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iseki, K.; Tanaka, S. An introduction to the theory of BCK-algebras. Math. Jpn. 1978, 23, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Jun, Y.B.; Hur, K.; Lee, K.J. Hyperfuzzy subalgebras of BCK/BCI-algebras. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inf. 2017, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Y.S. BCI-Algebra; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, J.; Jun, Y.B. BCK-Algebras; Kyungmoon Sa Co.: Seoul, Korea, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Garg, H. A robust ranking method for intuitionistic multiplicative sets under crisp, interval environments and its applications. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 2017, 1, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, F.; Jun, Y.B.; Liu, X.; Li, L. An adjustable approach to fuzzy soft set based decision making. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2010, 234, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, M.; Xu, Z. Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 2011, 52, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, H. Decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and its algorithm. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2017, 23, 119–131. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, G.; Alsaadi, F.E.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Hesitant bipolar fuzzy aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 1119–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).