Next Article in Journal
Accurate Implementation of Rotating Magneto-Hydrodynamics in a Channel Geometry Using an Influence Matrix Method
Previous Article in Journal
Inflation of Familywise Error Rate in Treatment Efficacy Testing Due to the Reallocation of Significance Levels Based on Safety Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Control Mechanism of the Coal Pillar Width on the Mechanical State of Hard Roofs

1
College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
2
State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Gas Drainage & Ground Control of Deep Mines, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454099, China
3
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
4
School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2025, 13(16), 2548; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13162548
Submission received: 22 July 2025 / Revised: 7 August 2025 / Accepted: 7 August 2025 / Published: 8 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section E: Applied Mathematics)

Abstract

This study addresses the critical challenge of optimizing coal pillar width in burst-prone mines with thick, hard roof strata, balancing resource recovery, roadway stability, and coal burst mitigation. Through integrated analytical modeling and rigorously calibrated numerical simulations, the research reveals the complex interplay between pillar width, roof mechanics, and stress redistribution. Key findings demonstrate that pillar width dictates roof failure mechanics and energy accumulation. The case study indicates that increasing the coal pillar width from 6 m to 20 m shifts the tensile fracture location from solid coal toward the pillar center, migrates shear failure zones closer to roadways, and relocates elastic strain energy accumulation to the pillar area. This concentrates static and dynamic loads directly onto wider pillars upon roof fracture, escalating instability risks. A risky coal pillar width is identified as 10–20 m, where pillars develop severe lateral abutment pressures perilously close to roadways, combining high elastic energy storage with exposure to roof fracture dynamics. Conversely, narrow pillars exhibit low stress concentrations and limited energy storage due to plastic deformation, reducing burst potential despite requiring robust asymmetric support. Strategic selection of narrow or wide pillars provides a safer pathway. The validated analytical–numerical framework offers a scientifically grounded methodology for pillar design under hard roof conditions, enhancing resource recovery while mitigating coal burst risks.
Keywords: coal pillar width; hard roof; ground control; abutment stress; numerical simulation coal pillar width; hard roof; ground control; abutment stress; numerical simulation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, Q.; Ji, S.; Zhang, J.; Fang, Z.; Lyu, C.; Karlovšek, J. The Control Mechanism of the Coal Pillar Width on the Mechanical State of Hard Roofs. Mathematics 2025, 13, 2548. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13162548

AMA Style

Jia Q, Ji S, Zhang J, Fang Z, Lyu C, Karlovšek J. The Control Mechanism of the Coal Pillar Width on the Mechanical State of Hard Roofs. Mathematics. 2025; 13(16):2548. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13162548

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Qifeng, Songtao Ji, Jie Zhang, Zhiyu Fang, Chao Lyu, and Jurij Karlovšek. 2025. "The Control Mechanism of the Coal Pillar Width on the Mechanical State of Hard Roofs" Mathematics 13, no. 16: 2548. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13162548

APA Style

Jia, Q., Ji, S., Zhang, J., Fang, Z., Lyu, C., & Karlovšek, J. (2025). The Control Mechanism of the Coal Pillar Width on the Mechanical State of Hard Roofs. Mathematics, 13(16), 2548. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13162548

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop