Next Article in Journal
Convection in a Rapidly Rotating Spherical Shell: Newton’s Method Using Implicit Coriolis Integration
Previous Article in Journal
Complete Stability Analysis for Delayed Economic Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Model Efficiency Analysis Based on Dissimilar Algorithms for Image Learning and Correction as a Means of Fault-Finding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Comparative Study of Descriptors for Quadrant-Convexity

1
Department of Image Processing and Computer Graphics, University of Szeged, Árpád tér 2., H-6720 Szeged, Hungary
2
Department of Information Engineering and Mathematics, University of Siena, Via Roma, 56, 53100 Siena, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2025, 13(13), 2114; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132114 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 April 2025 / Revised: 13 June 2025 / Accepted: 25 June 2025 / Published: 27 June 2025

Abstract

Many different descriptors have been proposed to measure the convexity of digital shapes. Most of these are based on the definition of continuous convexity and exhibit both advantages and drawbacks when applied in the digital domain. In contrast, within the field of Discrete Tomography, a special type of convexity—called Quadrant-convexity—has been introduced. This form of convexity naturally arises from the pixel-based representation of digital shapes and demonstrates favorable properties for reconstruction from projections. In this paper, we present an overview of using Quadrant-convexity as the basis for designing shape descriptors. We explore two different approaches: the first is based on the geometric features of Quadrant-convex objects, while the second relies on the identification of Quadrant-concave pixels. For both approaches, we conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the strengths and limitations of the proposed descriptors. In particular, we show that all our descriptors achieve an average accuracy of approximately 95% to 97.5% on noisy retina images for a binary classification task. Furthermore, in a multiclass classification setting using a dataset of desmids, all our descriptors outperform traditional low-level shape descriptors, achieving an accuracy of 76.74%.
Keywords: image analysis; shape descriptor; spatial relations; quadrant-convexity image analysis; shape descriptor; spatial relations; quadrant-convexity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Balázs, P.; Brunetti, S. A Comparative Study of Descriptors for Quadrant-Convexity. Mathematics 2025, 13, 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132114

AMA Style

Balázs P, Brunetti S. A Comparative Study of Descriptors for Quadrant-Convexity. Mathematics. 2025; 13(13):2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Balázs, Péter, and Sara Brunetti. 2025. "A Comparative Study of Descriptors for Quadrant-Convexity" Mathematics 13, no. 13: 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132114

APA Style

Balázs, P., & Brunetti, S. (2025). A Comparative Study of Descriptors for Quadrant-Convexity. Mathematics, 13(13), 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop