Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.A., A.I., V.I., H.K., P.Y. and B.Z.; methodology, A.A., A.I., V.I., H.K., P.Y. and B.Z.; investigation, A.A., A.I., V.I., H.K., P.Y. and B.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., A.I., V.I., H.K., P.Y. and B.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.A., A.I., V.I., H.K., P.Y. and B.Z. The listed authors have contributed equally in the research and are listed in alphabetical order. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Market share percentages for Verizon (blue), AT&T (red), T-Mobile (green), and Sprint (brown).
Figure 1.
Market share percentages for Verizon (blue), AT&T (red), T-Mobile (green), and Sprint (brown).
Figure 2.
PACF of the initial time series. (a) PACF of the initial time series ; (b) PACF of the initial time series of ; (c) PACF of the initial time series of ; (d) PACF of the initial time series of .
Figure 2.
PACF of the initial time series. (a) PACF of the initial time series ; (b) PACF of the initial time series of ; (c) PACF of the initial time series of ; (d) PACF of the initial time series of .
Figure 3.
An approximation by using the ordered triple of response functions . (a) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (b) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (c) : blue-the real data, red-an approximation using , green—an approximation using .
Figure 3.
An approximation by using the ordered triple of response functions . (a) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (b) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (c) : blue-the real data, red-an approximation using , green—an approximation using .
Figure 4.
ACF plots of the residuals in the models. (a) ACF plot of the residuals in the model for ; (b) ACF plot of the residuals in the model for ; (c) ACF plot of the residuals in the model for .
Figure 4.
ACF plots of the residuals in the models. (a) ACF plot of the residuals in the model for ; (b) ACF plot of the residuals in the model for ; (c) ACF plot of the residuals in the model for .
Figure 5.
(a,b) Market share percentages over time for Verizon (blue), AT&T (red), and T-Mobile + Sprint (green).
Figure 5.
(a,b) Market share percentages over time for Verizon (blue), AT&T (red), and T-Mobile + Sprint (green).
Figure 6.
An approximation by using the ordered triple of response functions . (a) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (b) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (c) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using .
Figure 6.
An approximation by using the ordered triple of response functions . (a) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (b) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (c) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using .
Figure 7.
An approximation by using the ordered triple of response functions . (a) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (b) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (c) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using .
Figure 7.
An approximation by using the ordered triple of response functions . (a) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (b) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (c) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using .
Figure 8.
An approximation by using the ordered triple of response functions . (a) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (b) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (c) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using .
Figure 8.
An approximation by using the ordered triple of response functions . (a) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (b) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using ; (c) : blue—the real data, red—an approximation using , green—an approximation using .
Table 1.
Result from the unit root tests of the initial time series.
Table 1.
Result from the unit root tests of the initial time series.
Statistics | | | | | |
---|
Dickey–Fuller F test | statistic | −0.165 | 0.400 | 0.549 | −0.182 |
p-value | 0.642 | 0.782 | 0.817 | 0.638 |
Phillips–Perron F test | statistic | −0.161 | 0.402 | 0.548 | −0.175 |
p-value | 0.643 | 0.782 | 0.817 | 0.639 |
Table 2.
Outcomes of the unit root test of the differenced time series.
Table 2.
Outcomes of the unit root test of the differenced time series.
Statistics | | | | | |
---|
Dickey–Fuller F test | statistic | −47.65 | −45.41 | −44.71 | −44.71 |
p-value | | | | |
Phillips–Perron F test | statistic | −43.72 | −41.92 | −42.08 | −42.08 |
p-value | | | | |
Table 3.
Outcomes of the unit root test of the differenced time series.
Table 3.
Outcomes of the unit root test of the differenced time series.
Statistics | | | | | |
---|
KPSS test | statistic | 0.7398 | 0.9977 | 0.9695 | 0.5436 |
p-value | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.032 |
Critical Values | 1%:0.739 | 1%:0.739 | 1%:0.739 | 5%:0.463 |
Table 4.
Pearson correlation coefficients.
Table 4.
Pearson correlation coefficients.
| | | | | | Lag | Lag | Lag | Lag |
---|
| PCC | 1 | −0.852 | −0.587 | 0.481 | 0.873 | −0.820 | −0.568 | 0.507 |
Sig. | | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| PCC | | 1 | 0.885 | −0.720 | −0.825 | 0.982 | 0.866 | −0.691 |
Sig. | | | | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| PCC | | | 1 | −0.596 | −0.591 | 0.888 | 0.964 | −0.574 |
Sig. | | | | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| PCC | | | | 1 | 0.548 | −0.735 | −0.607 | 0.923 |
Sig. | | | | | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Lag | PCC | | | | | 1 | −0.845 | −0.571 | 0.455 |
Sig. | | | | | | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Lag | PCC | | | | | | 1 | 0.882 | −0.702 |
Sig. | | | | | | | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Lag | PCC | | | | | | | 1 | −0.578 |
Sig. | | | | | | | | <0.001 |
Table 5.
ARIMAX models for the group , , and .
Table 5.
ARIMAX models for the group , , and .
| | | Model | | | p-Value (Ljung–Box Test) | Remarks |
---|
| | | ARIMA(0,1,0)(0,0,0) | 0.832 | 1.702 | 0.959 | (diff.=1); (insign.) |
| | | ARIMA(0,1,0)(1,1,0) | 0.971 | 1.621 | 0.554 | (diff.=1, season.diff.=1); (diff.=1) |
| | | ARIMA(0,1,0)(0,0,0) | 0.949 | 3.781 | 0.926 | natural log. transf., (diff.=1); (diff.=1, lag=1) |
Table 6.
ARIMAX models for group , , and .
Table 6.
ARIMAX models for group , , and .
| | | Model | | | p-Value (Ljung–Box Test) | Remarks |
---|
| | | ARIMA(0,1,0)(0,0,0) | 0.928 | 1.017 | 0.811 | (diff.=1); (diff.=1) |
| | | ARIMA(0,1,0)(0,1,0) | 0.987 | 1.055 | 0.705 | (diff.=1, season.diff.=1); (diff.=1, season.diff.=1) |
| | | ARIMA(0,1,0)(0,0,0) | 0.937 | 1.345 | 0.809 | natural log. transf., (diff.=1); (diff.=1) |
Table 7.
Statistical performance of the created models.
Table 7.
Statistical performance of the created models.
| Model | Model | Model |
---|
| 0.985 | 0.999 | 0.998 |
MAPE | 0.00962 | 0.00789 | 0.02305 |
Table 8.
Statistical performance of the created models.
Table 8.
Statistical performance of the created models.
| Model | Model | Model |
---|
| 0.8917 | 0.9848 | 0.9422 |
MAPE | 0.0192 | 0.01477 | 0.0160 |
Table 9.
Statistical performance of the constructed models.
Table 9.
Statistical performance of the constructed models.
| Model | Model | Model |
---|
| 0.8945 | 0.9844 | 0.9406 |
MAPE | 0.1965 | 0.01417 | 0.0157 |
Table 10.
Statistical performance of the created models.
Table 10.
Statistical performance of the created models.
| Model | Model | Model |
---|
| 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.993 |
MAPE | 0.0138 | 0.0178 | 0.0356 |