Evaluation of the Segmental Casting Length of Strongly Restrained Super-Long Mass Concrete Based on Crack Resistance
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Study and Finite Element Analysis
2.1. Project Description
2.2. Shrinkage Test Materials and Mixing Proportions
2.3. Shrinkage Test
2.4. On-Site Test and Finite Element Analysis
3. Length Limits of Strongly Constrained Super-Long Concrete Segments
3.1. Casting Thickness
3.2. Moulding Temperature
3.3. Restrained Expansion Rate
3.4. Practical Algorithm for Determining the Segmental Length Limit of Strongly Constrained Super-Long Mass Concrete
+ [2m(2,1) − m(2,2)]α + 2c(2,1) − c(2,2)}H + {[2m(1,2) − m(1,1)]α + [2c(1,2) − c(1,1)]
− [m(2,2) − m(2,1)]α − c(2,2) + c(2,1)}T + [2m(1,1) − m(1,2)]α − [2m(2,1) − m(2,2)]α
+ 2c(1,1) − c(1,2) − 2c(2,1) + c(2,2)
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The segmental casting length has a large effect on the stress of strongly constrained super-long mass concrete structures. Increasing the segment length significantly increases the maximum stress in the post-cast segment. Factors such as the casting thickness, moulding temperature, and restrained expansion rate affect the segmental length limit of the post-cast segment. All of the parameters have a linear relationship with the segmental length limit;
- (2)
- The exact formula, as well as the simplified formula for calculating the segmental length limit of the post-cast segment considering the parameters of the casting thickness, moulding temperature, and restrained expansion rate, were derived from the analysis. A comparison between the results calculated from these formulae was conducted, and the maximum error was 1.7%, indicating the high accuracy of the proposed formulae. These formulae can be used to calculate the segmental length of post-cast sections in the construction of strongly constrained super-long mass concrete structures.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Maruyama, I.; Lura, P. Properties of early-age concrete relevant to cracking in massive concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 123, 105770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Tian, Q.; Miao, C. Investigation on the plastic shrinkage of cementitious materials under drying conditions: Mechanism and theoretical model. Mag. Concr. Res. 2012, 64, 550–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.H.; Chen, J.; Zou, F. A comparative study of temperature of mass concrete placed in August and November based on on-site measurement. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 15, e00694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamid, H.; Chorzepa, M.G. Quantifying maximum temperature in 17 mass concrete cube specimens made with mixtures including metakaolin and/or slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 252, 118950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Tian, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, W. Evaluation method and mitigation strategies for shrinkage cracking of modern concrete. Engineering 2021, 7, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klemczak, B.; Batog, M.; Pilch, M.; Żmij, A. Analysis of Cracking Risk in Early Age Mass Concrete with Different Aggregate Types. Procedia Eng. 2017, 193, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Hu, Y.; Ma, R. Concrete thermal failure criteria, test method, and mechanism: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 283, 122762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.Q.; Wang, Z.H.; Jiang, Y.H. Temperature control and crack prevention during construction in steep slope dams and stilling basins in high-altitude areas. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2018, 10, 1687814017752480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Do, T.A.; Hoang, T.T.; Thanh, B.T. Evaluation of heat of hydration, temperature evolution and thermal cracking risk in high-strength concrete at early ages. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2020, 21, 100658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, D.J.; Liu, X.Z.; Zeng, X. Effect of polypropylene plastic fibers length on cracking resistance of high performance concrete at early age. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 244, 117874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouta, N.; Saliba, J.; Saiyouri, N. Effect of flax fibers on early age shrinkage and cracking of earth concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 254, 119315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, D.J.; Liu, C.; Wang, M. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol fiber on the cracking risk of high strength concrete under uniaxial restrained condition at early age. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 300, 124206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.D.; Yu, Z.P.; Chen, K.X. Investigation of temperature development and cracking control strategies of mass concrete: A field monitoring case study. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 18, e02144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitroda, J.; Zala, L.B.; Umrigar, F.S. Experimental investigations on partial replacement of cement with fly ly-ash in design mix concrete. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. 2012, 3, 126–129. [Google Scholar]
- Kalinski, M.E.; Yerra, P.K. Hydraulic conductivity of compacted cement-stabilized fly ash. Structures 2006, 85, 2330–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.L.; You, Y.J.; Li, P.Y. Study on strength exothermic and hydration evolution of low heat cement mixed with fly ash. Concrete 2022, 2, 54–59. [Google Scholar]
- Shabab, M.E.; Shahzada, K.; Gencturk, B. Synergistic Effect of Fly Ash and Bentonite as Partial Replacement of Cement in Mass Concrete. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2016, 20, 1987–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hooton, R.D.; Zhang, X. Effects of interface roughness and interface adhesion on new-to-old concrete bonding. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 151, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.; Hansen, W. Tensile creep behavior of concrete subject to constant restraint at very early ages. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2013, 25, 1277–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, R.; Hao, H.; Rousakis, T.; Lau, D. Effect of shrinkage reducing admixture on new-to-old concrete interface. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 167, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Chen, H.; Nie, X.; Tao, M. Experimental study on bond and anchorage of steel bars in precast concrete structures with new-to-old concrete interface. Eng. Struct. 2021, 247, 113086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klemczak, B.; Batog, M.; Giergiczny, Z.; Zmij, A. Complex Effect of Concrete Composition on the Thermo-Mechanical Behaviour of Mass Concrete. Materials 2018, 11, 2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Chen, J.; Xu, Q.; Zhou, Z. Research on the Influence Factors of Thermal Cracking in Mass Concrete by Model Experiments. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2018, 22, 2906–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Nie, L.; Wang, B. A numerical simulation of the temperature cracking propagation process when pouring mass concrete. Autom. Constr. 2014, 37, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smolana, A.; Klemczak, B.; Azenha, M.; Schlicke, D. Experiences and analysis of the construction process of mass foundation slabs aimed at reducing the risk of early age cracks. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 102947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, W.; Liu, J.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, H.; Li, L. Research on the critical casting length of oversized concrete monolithic foundation post-cast zone. China Concr. Cem. Prod. 2019, 274, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
- Cha, S.L.; Jin, S.S. Prediction of thermal stresses in mass concrete structures with experimental and analytical results. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 258, 120367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smolana, A.; Klemczak, B.; Azenha, M.; Schlicke, D. Early age cracking risk in a massive concrete foundation slab: Comparison of analytical and numerical prediction models with on-site measurements. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 301, 124135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhao, Z.; Lyu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zou, P. Early-Hydration heat and influencing factor analysis of Large-Volume concrete box girder based on equivalent age. Structures 2023, 50, 1699–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB50496-2018; Standard for the Construction of Massive Concrete. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China; China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2018.
- Choi, Y.S.; Kim, J.G.; Lee, K.M. Corrosion behavior of steel bar embedded in fly ash concrete. Corros. Sci. 2006, 48, 1733–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Lu, C.F. Time-varying law of rebar corrosion rate in fly ash concrete. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 360, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, H. Influence of high fly ash content on volume stability and durability of high performance concrete. Railw. Eng. 2010, 6, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
- GB/T50146-2014; Application Technical Specification of Fly Ash Concrete. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China; China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2014.
- Lv, M. Experimental study on the influence of curing conditions and reinforcement ratio on early shrinkage of micro-expanded concrete. Chin. Sci. Technol. J. Database (Full-Text Version) Eng. 2023, 5, 0145–0150. [Google Scholar]
- ACICommittee209. Prediction of Creep, Shrinkage, and Temperature Effects in Concrete Structures; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
Strength Grade | Amount of Material (kg/m3) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cement | Water | Sand | Stone | Fly Ash | Expander | |
C40 | 252 | 150 | 748 | 1070 | 76 | 63 |
Gravel | River Sand | ||
---|---|---|---|
Screen Mesh Size (mm) | Accumulated Sieving Residue (%) | Screen Mesh Size (mm) | Accumulated Sieving Residue (%) |
2.36 | 99 | 0.15 | 95 |
4.75 | 92 | 0.3 | 80 |
9.5 | 79 | 0.6 | 58 |
16 | 54 | 1.18 | 37 |
19 | 23 | 2.36 | 19 |
26.5 | 4 | 4.75 | 3 |
31.5 | 0 | / | / |
Ingredients | Cement | Fly Ash | Ingredients | Cement | Fly Ash |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | 19.39 | 55.49 | SrO | 0.0516 | 0.115 |
Al2O3 | 3.75 | 25.22 | MnO | 0.0581 | 0.0856 |
Fe2O3 | 3.245 | 5.876 | V2O5 | / | 0.028 |
CaO | 62.1 | 4.425 | ZnO | 0.0287 | 0.0231 |
K2O | 0.865 | 2.627 | MoO3 | / | 0.018 |
SO3 | 3.289 | 2.09 | Cr2O3 | 0.0015 | 0.015 |
TiO2 | 0.238 | 1.28 | CuO | 0.006 | 0.0125 |
Na2O | 0.183 | 1.18 | NiO | / | 0.01 |
MgO | 3.22 | 0.954 | BaO | / | 0.219 |
P2O5 | 0.0529 | 0.322 | Cl | 0.04 | / |
Concrete | Reinforcement | ||
---|---|---|---|
Strength Grade | C30 | C40 | HRB400 |
Elasticity Modulus (GPa) | 30 | 32.2 × (1 − 10−0.09t) | 206 |
Poisson’s Ratio | 0.2 | 0.3 | |
Tensile Strength (MPa) | 2.01 | See Equations (1) and (2) | / |
Yield Strength (MPa) | / | 400 | |
Unit Weight (kN/m3) | 25 | 78 |
Parameters | Concrete (C40) | Cooling Pipe |
---|---|---|
Adiabatic Temperature Rise (°C) | 40.7 × (1 − 10−1.12t) | / |
Ambient Temperature (°C) | 15 + 12.1 × sin(π/12t) | |
Shrinkage Strain | εy(t) = εy0(1 − 10−0.01t)·M1·M2·M3···M11This article modifies the formula based on factors such as different cross-sectional dimensions | / |
Creep Coefficient | Refer to the literature [36] | / |
Convection Coefficient (W/m2·(°C) | 13 | 371 |
Thermal Expansion Coefficient | 1 × 10−5 | 1.2 × 10−5 |
Conductivity (kJ/(m·h·°C)) | 10.08 | / |
Specific Heat (kJ/(kg·°C)) | 0.96 | 0.465 |
Moulding Temperature (°C) | 20 | / |
Inlet Temperature (°C) | / | 15 |
Flow Rate (m3/h) | / | 1.2 |
Variance Source | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Square | F Value | P Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 6082.88 | 3 | 2027.63 | 13130.69 | <0.0001 |
H | 561.73 | 1 | 561.73 | 3637.70 | <0.0001 |
T | 880.73 | 1 | 880.73 | 5703.52 | <0.0001 |
α | 3875.08 | 1 | 3875.08 | 25,094.57 | <0.0001 |
Residual | 7.41 | 48 | 0.15 | / | / |
Misfitting Term | 7.41 | 46 | 0.16 | / | / |
Pure Error | 0.000 | 2 | 0.000 | / | / |
Sum | 6090.29 | 51 | / | / | / |
R-Squared | 0.9988 | Adj R-Squared | 0.9987 | Pred R-Squared | 0.9985 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Guo, F.; Li, D.; Nabil, M.; Guo, J.; Zhang, N.; Lv, M. Evaluation of the Segmental Casting Length of Strongly Restrained Super-Long Mass Concrete Based on Crack Resistance. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12071078
Guo F, Li D, Nabil M, Guo J, Zhang N, Lv M. Evaluation of the Segmental Casting Length of Strongly Restrained Super-Long Mass Concrete Based on Crack Resistance. Mathematics. 2024; 12(7):1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12071078
Chicago/Turabian StyleGuo, Fengqi, Dezhou Li, Mohammed Nabil, Jiepeng Guo, Ning Zhang, and Maofeng Lv. 2024. "Evaluation of the Segmental Casting Length of Strongly Restrained Super-Long Mass Concrete Based on Crack Resistance" Mathematics 12, no. 7: 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12071078
APA StyleGuo, F., Li, D., Nabil, M., Guo, J., Zhang, N., & Lv, M. (2024). Evaluation of the Segmental Casting Length of Strongly Restrained Super-Long Mass Concrete Based on Crack Resistance. Mathematics, 12(7), 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12071078