Next Article in Journal
SIR Epidemic Model with General Nonlinear Incidence Rate and Lévy Jumps
Previous Article in Journal
Analytical and Computational Approaches for Bi-Stable Reaction and p-Laplacian Diffusion Flame Dynamics in Porous Media
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

SHARDA–ARAS: A Methodology for Prioritising Project Managers in Sustainable Development

by
Zenonas Turskis
1 and
Violeta Keršulienė
2,*
1
The Institute of Sustainable Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 03224 Vilnius, Lithuania
2
Department of Law, Business Management Faculty, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2024, 12(2), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020219
Submission received: 10 November 2023 / Revised: 28 December 2023 / Accepted: 5 January 2024 / Published: 9 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section E: Applied Mathematics)

Abstract

In sustainable economic development, top-level human capital, especially project management, is paramount. This article integrates the Systematic Hierarchical Attribute Ratio Delphic Rating (SHARDA) method and the Additive Ratio Rating (ARAS) method as a robust framework for identifying and training project managers. The research draws on a diverse panel of experts against the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) backdrop, emphasising stakeholder engagement and transparency in the decision-making processes. This study investigates the complexity of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and focuses on SWARA and ARAS methods. These methodologies comprehensively improve the decision-making process, considering a range of subjective criteria. The extended and modified hierarchical SWARA method helps us understand each measure’s importance, while the ARAS method simplifies ranking and selection based on performance ratios. The research methodology seamlessly integrates these methods to form the SHARDA–ARAS methodology that addresses the challenging task of selecting project managers for sustainable development. This methodology guarantees a systematic and inclusive decision-making process, incorporating stakeholder perspectives seamlessly aligned with global sustainability goals. The studio’s innovation is wrapped in the synthesis of SWARA and ARAS into the SHARDA–ARAS methodology, presenting a nuanced and effective tool for project manager selection. Promoting an interconnected and holistic approach that contributes to sustainable development emphasises the methodology’s ability to balance economic, environmental, and social aspects. Thus, the article provides an invaluable method for organisations seeking global sustainable economic development.
Keywords: Systemic Hierarchical Attribute Ratio Delphic Assessment method; SHARDA; MCDM; sustainability; SWARA; ARAS; hierarchy Systemic Hierarchical Attribute Ratio Delphic Assessment method; SHARDA; MCDM; sustainability; SWARA; ARAS; hierarchy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Turskis, Z.; Keršulienė, V. SHARDA–ARAS: A Methodology for Prioritising Project Managers in Sustainable Development. Mathematics 2024, 12, 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020219

AMA Style

Turskis Z, Keršulienė V. SHARDA–ARAS: A Methodology for Prioritising Project Managers in Sustainable Development. Mathematics. 2024; 12(2):219. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Turskis, Zenonas, and Violeta Keršulienė. 2024. "SHARDA–ARAS: A Methodology for Prioritising Project Managers in Sustainable Development" Mathematics 12, no. 2: 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020219

APA Style

Turskis, Z., & Keršulienė, V. (2024). SHARDA–ARAS: A Methodology for Prioritising Project Managers in Sustainable Development. Mathematics, 12(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020219

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop