Next Article in Journal
Causality-Driven Efficient Feature Selection for Deep-Learning-Based Surface Roughness Prediction in Milling Machines
Next Article in Special Issue
Coefficient Estimates for Quasi-Subordination Classes Connected with the Combination of q-Convolution and Error Function
Previous Article in Journal
nmPLS-Net: Segmenting Pulmonary Lobes Using nmODE
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fuzzy Differential Subordination Associated with a General Linear Transformation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Application for Bi-Concave Functions Associated with q-Convolution

1
Department of Mathematics, College of Science and Arts, Al-Badaya, Qassim University, Buraidah 52571, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, New Damietta 34517, Egypt
3
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Oradea, 1 University Street, 410087 Oradea, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2023, 11(22), 4680; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11224680
Submission received: 6 September 2023 / Revised: 3 November 2023 / Accepted: 14 November 2023 / Published: 17 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Topics in Geometric Function Theory)

Abstract

:
The aim of this paper is to introduce and investigate some new subclasses of bi-concave functions using q-convolution and some applications. These special cases are obtaining by making use of a q- derivative linear operator. For the new introduced subclasses, the authors obtain the first two initial Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients | c 2 | and | c 3 | of bi-concave functions. For certain values of the parameters, the authors deduce interesting corollaries for coefficient bounds which imply special cases of the new introduced operator. Also, we develop two examples for coefficients | c 2 | and | c 3 | for certain functions.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

Assuming that A denote the class of functions with the given form:
F ς = ς + n = 2 + c n ς n , ( ς U ) ,
which in the unit disc U = { ς : ς < 1 } are analytic and univalent, and let the function H A be given by
H ( ς ) : = ς + n = 2 + d n ς n , ς U .
Then, F and H Hadamard (or convolution) product is given by
( F H ) ( ς ) : = ς + n = 2 + c n d n ς n , ς U .
For each univalent function F A , the Koebe one-quarter Theorem ([1]) establishes that the disk with radius ( 1 / 4 ) belongs to the image of U . An inverse F 1 of a function F A exists and is satisfied.
F ( F 1 ( ϖ ) ) = ϖ , ϖ < R 0 F , R 0 F 1 4 ,
where
G ( ϖ ) = F 1 ( ϖ ) = ϖ c 2 ϖ 2 + 2 c 2 2 c 3 ϖ 3
5 c 2 3 5 c 2 c 3 + c 4 ϖ 4 + , ϖ U .
The study of analytic and bi-univalent functions is revitalized in 2010 by Srivastava et al., and the literature has since been supplemented with many sequels to their paper (see [2]). A function F A is called to as bi-univalent in U if F and F 1 are both univalent in U .
Let Σ denote the class of bi-univalent functions in U given by (1). Note that the functions F 1 ( ς ) = ς 1 ς , F 2 ( ς ) = 1 2 log 1 + ς 1 ς , F 3 ( ς ) = log ( 1 ς ) , with their corresponding inverses F 1 1 ( ϖ ) = ϖ 1 + ϖ , F 2 1 ( ϖ ) = e 2 ϖ 1 e 2 ϖ + 1 , F 3 1 ( ϖ ) = e ϖ 1 e ϖ , are elements of Σ (see [2]). For a brief history and interesting examples in the class Σ , see [3]. Brannan and Taha [4] (see also [2]) introduced certain subclasses of the bi-univalent functions class Σ similar to the familiar subclasses S α and K α of starlike and convex functions of order α 0 α < 1 , respectively (see [3]), where the function G is the analytic extension of F 1 to U given by (3).
The function F : U C is said to belong to the family C 0 ( α ) if F satisfies the following conditions:
(i)
F is analytic in U with the standard normalization F ( 0 ) = F ( 0 ) 1 = 0 ;
(ii)
F maps U conformally onto a set whose complement with respect to C is convex;
(iii)
The opening angle of F U at is less than or equal to π α , α ( 1 , 2 ] .
Concave univalent functions are referred to as the class C 0 ( α ) , and for a thorough study of concave functions (see [5,6]). In particular, the inequality
1 + ς F ( ς ) F ( ς ) < 0 , ( ς U ) ,
is used. Bhowmik et al. [7] showed that an analytic function F maps U onto a concave domain of angle π α , if and only if P F ς > 0 , where
P F ς = 2 α 1 α + 1 1 + ς 2 1 ς 1 ς F ( ς ) F ( ς ) .
There have been a number of investigations on basic subclasses of concave univalent functions (see [8,9]).
For 0 < q < 1 , the q-derivative operator [10,11] (see also [12]) for F H is defined by
D q F H ( ς ) : = D q ς + n = 2 + c n d n ς n = F H ( ς ) F H ( q ς ) ς ( 1 q ) = 1 + n = 2 + [ n ] q c n d n ς n 1 , ς U ,
where
[ n ] q : = 1 q n 1 q = 1 + j = 1 n 1 q j , 0 q : = 0 .
For α > 1 and 0 < q < 1 , El-Deeb et al. [12] defined the linear operator R H α , q : A A as follows
R H α , q F ( ς ) I q , α + 1 ( ς ) = ς D q F H ( ς ) , ς U ,
where the function I q , α + 1 is given by
I q , α + 1 ( ς ) : = ς + n = 2 + [ α + 1 ] q , n 1 [ n 1 ] q ! ς n , ς U .
A simple computation shows that
R H α , q F ( ς ) : = ς + n = 2 + [ n ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , n 1 c n d n ς n ( α > 1 , 0 < q < 1 , ς U ) .
By using the operator R H α , q , we define a new operator as follows:
D H , δ α , q , 0 F ( ς ) = R H α , q F ( ς ) D H , δ α , q , 1 F ( ς ) = δ ς 3 R H α , q F ( ς ) + 1 + 2 δ ς 2 R H α , q F ( ς ) + ς R H α , q F ( ς ) . . D H , δ α , q , m F ( ς ) = δ ς 3 D H , δ α , q , m 1 F ( ς ) + 1 + 2 δ ς 2 D H , δ α , q , m 1 F ( ς ) + ς D H , δ α , q , m 1 F ( ς ) = ς + n = 2 + n 2 m δ n 1 + 1 m [ n ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , n 1 c n d n ς n = ς + n = 2 + ρ n c n ς n ( α > 1 , 0 < q < 1 , m , δ N 0 = N { 0 } , ς U ) ,
where
ρ n = n 2 m δ n 1 + 1 m [ n ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , n 1 d n .
From the Definition relation (5), we can easily verify that the next relations hold for all F A :
(i)
[ α + 1 ] q D H , δ α , q , m F ( ς ) = [ α ] q D H , δ α + 1 , q , m F ( ς ) + q μ ς D q D H , δ α + 1 , q , m F ( ς ) , ς U ;
(ii)
I H , δ α , m F ( ς ) : = lim q 1 D H , δ α , q , m F ( ς ) = ς + n = 2 + n 2 m δ n 1 + 1 m n ! ( α + 1 ) n 1 c n d n ς n , ς U .
Remark 1.
Taking different particular cases for the coefficients d n , we obtain the next special cases for the operator D h μ , q :
(i) 
For d n = 1 and m = 0 , we obtain the operator B q α defined by Srivastava et al. [13] as follows
B q α F ( ς ) : = ς + n = 2 + [ n ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , n 1 c n ς n , ( α > 1 , 0 < q < 1 , ς U ) ;
(ii) 
For d n = ( 1 ) n 1 Γ ( ρ + 1 ) 4 n 1 ( n 1 ) ! Γ ( n + ρ ) , ρ > 0 and m = 0 , we obtain the operator N ρ , q α defined by El-Deeb [14] as follows
N ρ , q α F ( ς ) : = ς + n = 2 + ( 1 ) n 1 Γ ( ρ + 1 ) 4 n 1 ( n 1 ) ! Γ ( n + ρ ) · [ n ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , n 1 c n ς n = ς + n = 2 + [ n ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , n 1 ϕ n c n ς n , ( ρ > 0 , α > 1 , 0 < q < 1 , ς U ) ,
where
ϕ n : = ( 1 ) n 1 Γ ( ρ + 1 ) 4 n 1 ( n 1 ) ! Γ ( n + ρ ) ;
(iii) 
For d n = t + 1 t + n ν , ν > 0 , t 0 and m = 0 , we obtain the operator M t , q α , ν as follows
M t , q α , ν F ( ς ) : = ς + n = 2 + t + 1 t + n ν · [ n ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , n 1 c n ς n , ς U ;
(iv) 
For d n = σ n 1 ( n 1 ) ! e σ , σ > 0 and m = 0 , we obtain the q-analogue of Poisson operator I q α , σ defined by El-Deeb et al. [12] as follows
I q α , σ F ( ς ) : = ς + m = 2 + σ n 1 ( n 1 ) ! e σ · [ n ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , n 1 c n ς n , ς U .
Definition 1.
Let the functions R , S : U C be so constrained that
min ( R ( ς ) , ( S ( ς ) > 0 ,
and
R ( 0 ) = S ( 0 ) = 1 .
In recent years, using the idea of analytic and bi-univalent functions, many ideas have been developed by different well-known authors. Also, the fractional q-calculus was applied in the geometric function theory, which has a new generalization of the classical operators. The concept of q-calculus operator has been broadly been applied in various fields, including optimal control, quantum physics, q-difference, fractional sub-diffusion equations, hypergeometric series and q-integral equations.
Now, we define the following subclass of bi-concave functions B H , δ α , q , m C 0 λ :
Definition 2.
Let the function F have the form (1), which is said to be in the class B H , δ α , q , m C 0 λ if the following conditions are satisfied:
F Σ , w i t h 2 λ 1 1 + λ 1 + ς 2 1 ς 1 ς D H , δ α , q , m F ς D H , δ α , q , m F ς R ( U ) ,
and
2 λ 1 1 + λ 1 + ϖ 2 1 ϖ 1 ϖ D H , δ α , q , m G ϖ D H , δ α , q , m G ϖ S ( U ) ,
with α > 1 , 0 < q < 1 , m , δ N 0 and λ ( 1 , 2 ] , where (3) denotes the function G , which is the analytic extension of F 1 to U .
Remark 2.
(i) 
Putting d n = ( 1 ) n 1 Γ ( ρ + 1 ) 4 n 1 ( n 1 ) ! Γ ( n + ρ ) , ρ > 0 and m = 0 , we find that N ρ α , q C 0 λ indicates the functions F Σ that satisfy (12) and (13) for D H , δ α , q , m substituted with N ρ , q α (8);
(ii) 
Putting t + 1 t + n ν , ν > 0 , t 0 and m = 0 , we obtain that M t , ν α , q C 0 λ indicates the functions F Σ that satisfy (12) and (13) for D H , δ α , q , m substituted with M t , q α , ν (10);
(iii) 
Putting σ n 1 ( n 1 ) ! e σ , σ > 0 and m = 0 , we obtain that I σ α , q C 0 λ indicates the functions F Σ that satisfy (12) and (13) for D H , δ α , q , m substituted with I q α , σ (11).
We established some results for coefficients bounds for bi-concave functions belonging to the class B H , δ α , q , m C 0 λ .

2. Coefficient Bounds for the Function Class B H , δ α , q , m C 0 λ

In this section, we discuss a class of bi-univalent analytic functions by applying a principle of convolution. In this sense, we establish in advance a new q-linear differential operator. Further we provide an estimate for the function coefficients | c 2 | and | c 3 | of the new classes.
Theorem 1.
If the function F given by (1) belongs to the class B H , δ α , q , m C 0 λ , and λ ( 1 , 2 ] , then
c 2 min λ + 1 2 4 ρ 2 2 + λ 1 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 ρ 2 2 + λ 2 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 ρ 2 2 ,
λ 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 16 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 + λ + 1 2 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 ,
and
c 3 min 8 λ + 1 2 + λ 1 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 ρ 2 2 + λ 2 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 ρ 2 2 + λ 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 48 ρ 3 ,
λ 1 3 ρ 3 ρ 2 2 R ( 0 ) + λ 1 ρ 2 2 S ( 0 ) 24 ρ 3 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 + λ + 1 2 2 ρ 2 2 ρ 3 ,
where ρ n ( n { 2 , 3 } ) are defined by (6).
Proof. 
If F B H , δ α , q , m C 0 λ , from (12) and (13), respectively. Hence, it follows that
2 λ 1 1 + λ 1 + ς 2 1 ς 1 ς D H , δ α , q , m F ς D H , δ α , q , m F ς = R ( ς ) ,
and
2 λ 1 1 + λ 1 + ϖ 2 1 ϖ 1 ϖ D H , δ α , q , m G ϖ D H , δ α , q , m G ϖ = S ( ϖ ) ,
where R and S satisfy the conditions of Definition 1. Then, the functions R ( ς ) and S ( ϖ ) have the following Taylor–Maclaurin series expansions:
R ( ς ) = 1 + r 1 ς + r 2 ς 2 + ,
and
S ( ϖ ) = 1 + s 1 ϖ + s 2 ϖ 2 + ,
respectively. By equalizing according to the coefficients of ς and ϖ in (14) and (15), it is obvious that
2 1 + λ 2 ρ 2 c 2 λ 1 = r 1 ,
2 1 + λ + 4 ρ 2 2 c 2 2 6 ρ 3 c 3 λ 1 = r 2 ,
2 1 + λ 2 ρ 2 c 2 λ 1 = s 1 ,
and
2 λ + 1 + 4 ρ 2 2 c 2 2 6 ρ 3 2 c 2 2 c 3 λ 1 = s 2 .
Using (18) and (20), we obtain
r 1 = s 1 ,
and from (18), we can write
c 2 = λ + 1 2 ρ 2 λ 1 4 ρ 2 r 1 .
Squaring (18) and (20), after adding relations, we obtain
c 2 2 = λ + 1 2 4 ρ 2 2 + λ 1 2 r 1 2 + s 1 2 32 ρ 2 2 λ 2 1 8 ρ 2 2 r 1 s 1 .
Adding (19) and (21), we have
c 2 2 = λ 1 r 2 + s 2 8 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 λ + 1 2 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 .
Taking the absolute value of (24) and (25), we conclude that
c 2 λ + 1 2 4 ρ 2 2 + λ 1 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 ρ 2 2 + λ 2 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 ρ 2 2 ,
and
c 2 λ 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 16 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 + λ + 1 2 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 ,
which gives the bound for c 2 as we asserted in our Theorem.
To find the bound for c 3 , by subtracting (21) from (19), we obtain
c 3 = c 2 2 λ 1 r 2 s 2 24 ρ 2 .
Also, upon substituting the value of in view of c 2 2 from (24) and (25) into (26), we obtain
c 3 = 1 + λ 2 4 ρ 2 2 + λ 1 2 r 1 2 + s 1 2 32 ρ 2 2 λ 2 1 8 ρ 2 2 r 1 s 1 λ 1 r 2 s 2 24 ρ 3 ,
and
c 3 = λ 1 r 2 + s 2 8 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 1 + λ 2 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 λ 1 r 2 s 2 24 ρ 3 .
Taking the absolute value of (27) and (28), we obtain
c 3 8 λ + 1 2 + λ 1 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 ρ 2 2 + λ 2 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 ρ 2 2 + λ 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 48 ρ 3 ,
and
c 3 λ 1 3 ρ 3 ρ 2 2 R ( 0 ) + λ 1 ρ 2 2 S ( 0 ) 24 ρ 3 2 ρ 2 2 3 ρ 3 + λ + 1 2 2 ρ 2 2 ρ 3 .
This completes the proof of the Theorem. □
Putting m = d n = 1 , we determine that S α , q C 0 λ in Theorem 1, we obtain the following Corollary:
Corollary 1.
For the function F given by (1) belonging to the class S α , q C 0 λ , and λ ( 1 , 2 ] , then
c 2 min λ + 1 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 4 [ 2 ] q ! 2 + λ 1 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 [ 2 ] q ! 2 + λ 2 1 [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 [ 2 ] q ! 2 ,
λ 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 16 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 ,
and
c 3 min [ α + 1 ] q 2 8 λ + 1 2 + λ 1 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 [ 2 ] q ! 2 +
λ 2 1 [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 [ 2 ] q ! 2 + λ 1 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 48 [ 3 ] q ! ,
λ 1 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) + λ 1 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 S ( 0 ) 24 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 .
Putting d n = ( 1 ) n 1 Γ ( ρ + 1 ) 4 n 1 ( n 1 ) ! Γ ( n + ρ ) , ρ > 0 and m = 0 in Theorem 1, we obtain the following Corollary:
Corollary 2.
If the function F given by (1) belongs to the class N ρ α , q C 0 λ , and λ ( 1 , 2 ] , then
c 2 min λ + 1 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 4 [ 2 ] q ! 2 ϕ 2 2 + λ 1 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 [ 2 ] q ! 2 ϕ 2 2 + λ 2 1 [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 [ 2 ] q ! 2 ϕ 2 2 ,
λ 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 16 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 ϕ 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 ϕ 3 + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 ϕ 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 ϕ 3 ,
and
c 3 min [ α + 1 ] q 2 8 λ + 1 2 + λ 1 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 [ 2 ] q ! 2 ϕ 2 2 +
λ 2 1 [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 [ 2 ] q ! 2 ϕ 2 2 + λ 1 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 48 [ 3 ] q ! ϕ 3 ,
λ 1 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 R ( 0 ) + λ 1 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 S ( 0 ) 24 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 ϕ 3 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 ϕ 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 ϕ 3 + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 ϕ 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 ϕ 3 ,
where ϕ n ( n { 2 , 3 } ) are defined by (9).
Putting d n = t + 1 t + n ν , ν > 0 , t 0 and m = 0 in Theorem 1, we obtain the following Corollary:
Corollary 3.
Let the function F given by (1) belongs to the class M t , ν α , q C 0 λ , and λ ( 1 , 2 ] , then
c 2 min λ + 1 2 t + 2 2 α [ α + 1 ] q 2 4 [ 2 ] q ! 2 t + 1 2 ν + λ 1 2 t + 2 2 α [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 [ 2 ] q ! 2 t + 1 2 ν
+ λ 2 1 t + 2 2 ν [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 [ 2 ] q ! 2 t + 1 2 ν ,
λ 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 16 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 t + 1 t + 2 2 ν 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 t + 1 t + 3 ν + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 t + 1 t + 2 2 ν 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 t + 1 t + 3 ν ,
and
c 3 min [ α + 1 ] q 2 t + 2 2 ν 8 λ + 1 2 + λ 1 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 [ 2 ] q ! 2 t + 1 2 ν +
λ 2 1 t + 2 2 ν [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 [ 2 ] q ! 2 t + 1 2 ν + λ 1 t + 3 ν [ α + 1 ] q , 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 48 [ 3 ] q ! t + 1 ν ,
λ 1 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 t + 1 t + 3 ν [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 t + 1 t + 2 2 ν R ( 0 ) + λ 1 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 t + 1 t + 2 2 ν S ( 0 ) 24 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 t + 1 t + 3 ν 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 t + 1 t + 2 2 ν 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 t + 1 t + 3 ν
+ λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 t + 1 t + 2 2 ν 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 t + 1 t + 3 ν .
Putting d n = σ n 1 ( n 1 ) ! e σ , σ > 0 and m = 0 in Theorem 1, we obtain the following Corollary:
Corollary 4.
Let the function F given by (1) belong to the class I σ α , q C 0 λ , and λ ( 1 , 2 ] ; then,
c 2 min λ + 1 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 4 σ 2 [ 2 ] q ! 2 e 2 σ + λ 1 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 σ 2 [ 2 ] q ! 2 e 2 σ + λ 2 1 [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 σ 2 [ 2 ] q ! 2 e 2 σ ,
λ 1 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 16 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 σ 2 e 2 σ 3 [ 3 ] q ! 2 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 σ 2 e σ + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 σ 2 e 2 σ 3 [ 3 ] q ! 2 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 σ 2 e σ ,
and
c 3 min [ α + 1 ] q 2 8 λ + 1 2 + λ 1 2 R ( 0 ) 2 + S ( 0 ) 2 32 [ 2 ] q ! 2 σ 2 e 2 σ +
λ 2 1 [ α + 1 ] q 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 8 [ 2 ] q ! 2 σ 2 e 2 σ + λ 1 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 R ( 0 ) + S ( 0 ) 24 [ 3 ] q ! σ 2 e σ ,
λ 1 3 [ 3 ] q ! 2 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 σ 2 e σ [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 σ 2 e 2 σ R ( 0 ) + λ 1 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 σ 2 e 2 σ S ( 0 ) 12 [ 3 ] q ! σ 2 e σ [ α + 1 ] q , 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 σ 2 e 2 σ 3 [ 3 ] q ! 2 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 σ 2 e σ
+ λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 σ 2 e 2 σ 3 [ 3 ] q ! 2 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 σ 2 e σ .
By specializing the functions R and S in Theorem 1, we obtain the following examples:
Example 1.
Having the functions
R ( ς ) = 1 + ς 1 ς β = 1 + 2 β ς + 2 β 2 ς 2 + , 0 < β 1 ,
S ( ϖ ) = 1 ϖ 1 + ϖ β = 1 2 β ϖ + 2 β 2 ϖ 2 , 0 < β 1 ,
and F given by (1), which belongs to the class B H , δ α , q , 0 C 0 λ , and λ ( 1 , 2 ] , then
c 2 min λ + 1 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 4 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 + β 2 λ 1 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 4 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 + β λ 2 1 [ α + 1 ] q 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 ,
β 2 λ 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 ,
and
c 3 min β 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 8 λ + 1 2 + λ 1 2 4 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 + β λ 2 1 [ α + 1 ] q 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 + β 2 λ 1 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 6 [ 3 ] q ! d 3 ,
λ 1 β 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 + λ 1 β 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 6 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 .
Example 2.
Considering the functions
R ( ς ) = 1 + 1 2 σ ς 1 ς = 1 + 2 1 σ ς + 2 1 σ ς 2 + , 0 σ < 1 ,
S ( ϖ ) = 1 1 2 σ ϖ 1 + ϖ = 1 2 1 σ ϖ + 2 1 σ ϖ 2 + , 0 σ < 1 ,
and F given by (1), which belongs to the class B H , δ α , q , 0 C 0 λ , and λ ( 1 , 2 ] , then
c 2 min λ + 1 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 4 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 + λ 1 2 1 σ 2 [ α + 1 ] q 2 3 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 + λ 2 1 1 σ [ α + 1 ] q 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 ,
λ 1 1 σ 2 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 ,
and
c 3 min [ α + 1 ] q 2 8 λ + 1 2 + λ 1 2 1 σ 2 4 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 + λ 2 1 1 σ [ α + 1 ] q 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! 2 d 2 2 + λ 1 1 σ 2 [ α + 1 ] q , 2 6 [ 3 ] q ! d 3 ,
λ 1 1 σ 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 + λ 1 1 σ 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 6 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 + λ + 1 2 2 [ 2 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q 2 d 2 2 3 [ 3 ] q ! [ α + 1 ] q , 2 d 3 .

3. Concluding Remarks and Observations

In this study, we used the q-derivative operator D H , δ α , q , m to introduce and examine the properties of a few new subclasses of the class of analytic and bi-concave functions in the open unit disk U . We derived estimates for the initial Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients | c 2 | and c 3 for functions belonging to the bi-concave function classes that are presented in this study, among other features and results. In addition, we chose to deduce a few corollaries and implications of our main points (see Theorem 1). Future studies may uncover special features of the defined subclasses of analytic and bi-concave functions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C. and S.M.E.-D.; methodology, A.C. and S.M.E.-D.; formal analysis, S.M.E.-D.; investigation, S.M.E.-D.; data curation, A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by University of Oradea, Romania.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Duren, P.L. Univalent Functions. In Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften; Springer: New York, NY, USA; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; Tokyo, Japan, 1983; Volume 259. [Google Scholar]
  2. Srivastava, H.M.; Mishra, A.K.; Gochhayat, P. Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brannan, D.A.; Clunie, J.; Kirwan, W.E. Coefficient estimates for a class of star-like functions. Canad. J. Math. 1970, 22, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brannan, D.A.; Taha, T.S. On some classes of bi-univalent functions. In Mathematical Analysis and Its Applications, Kuwait; Mazhar, S.M., Hamoui, A., Faour, N.S., Eds.; KFAS Proceedings Series; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1988; Volume 3, pp. 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayram, H.; Altinkaya, S. General Properties of Concave Functions Defined by the Generalized Srivastava-Attiya Operator. J. Comput. Anal. Appli. 2017, 23, 408–416. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cruz, L.; Pommerenke, C. On Concave Univalent Functions. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 2007, 52, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bhowmik, B.; Ponnusamy, S.; Wirths, K.J. Characterization and the Pre-Schwarzian Norm Estimate for Concave Univalent Functions. Monatsh Math. 2010, 161, 59–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Altinkaya, S. Bi-concave functions defined by Al-Oboudi differential operator. Iran. J. Math. Sci. Inform. 2022, 17, 207–217. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sakar, F.M.; Ozlem Guney, H. Coefficient Estimates for Bi-concave Functions. Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Ser. A1 Math. Stat. 2019, 68, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jackson, F.H. On q-functions and a certain difference operator. Trans. Royal Soc. Edinb. 1909, 46, 253–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jackson, F.H. On q-definite integrals. Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
  12. El-Deeb, S.M.; Bulboacă, T.; El-Matary, B.M. Maclaurin Coefficient Estimates of Bi-Univalent Functions Connected with the q-Derivative. Mathematics 2020, 8, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Srivastava, H.M.; Khan, S.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N.; Hussain, S. The Faber polynomial expansion method and its application to the general coefficient problem for some subclasses of bi-univalent functions associated with a certain q-integral operator. Stud. Univ. Babeş-Bolyai Math. 2018, 63, 419–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. El-Deeb, S.M. Maclaurin Coefficient Estimates for New Subclasses of Biunivalent Functions Connected with a q-Analogue of Bessel Function. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2020, 2020, 8368951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Deeb, S.M.; Catas, A. An Application for Bi-Concave Functions Associated with q-Convolution. Mathematics 2023, 11, 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11224680

AMA Style

El-Deeb SM, Catas A. An Application for Bi-Concave Functions Associated with q-Convolution. Mathematics. 2023; 11(22):4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11224680

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Deeb, Sheza M., and Adriana Catas. 2023. "An Application for Bi-Concave Functions Associated with q-Convolution" Mathematics 11, no. 22: 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11224680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop