Next Article in Journal
Indexing of US Counties with Overdispersed Incidences of COVID-19 Deaths
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Dynamical Behavior of Solitary Waves for Coupled Stochastic Korteweg–De Vries Equations
Previous Article in Journal
Almost Sure Exponential Stability of Uncertain Stochastic Hopfield Neural Networks Based on Subadditive Measures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detecting Line Sources inside Cylinders by Analytical Algorithms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exact Solutions of Reaction–Diffusion PDEs with Anisotropic Time Delay

by
Andrei D. Polyanin
* and
Vsevolod G. Sorokin
*
Ishlinsky Institute for Problems in Mechanics RAS, 101 Vernadsky Avenue, bldg 1, 119526 Moscow, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2023, 11(14), 3111; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11143111
Submission received: 8 June 2023 / Revised: 6 July 2023 / Accepted: 11 July 2023 / Published: 14 July 2023

Abstract

:
This study is devoted to reaction–diffusion equations with spatially anisotropic time delay. Reaction–diffusion PDEs with either constant or variable transfer coefficients are considered. Nonlinear equations of a fairly general form containing one, two, or more arbitrary functions and free parameters are analyzed. For the first time, reductions and exact solutions for such complex delay PDEs are constructed. Additive, multiplicative, generalized, and functional separable solutions and some other exact solutions are presented. In addition to reaction–diffusion equations, wave-type PDEs with spatially anisotropic time delay are considered. Overall, more than twenty new exact solutions to reaction–diffusion and wave-type equations with anisotropic time delay are found. The described nonlinear delay PDEs and their solutions can be used to formulate test problems applicable to the verification of approximate analytical and numerical methods for solving complex PDEs with variable delay.

Contents
  1.
Introduction
1.1.
Differential Equations with Delay: Brief Overview
1.2.
PDEs with Spatially Anisotropic Time Delay. Reductions. Term ‘Exact Solution’
  2.
Approaches to Constructing Exact Solutions
2.1.
Constructing Solutions to Complex Equations Using Solutions of Simpler Equations
2.2.
PDEs with Anisotropic Time Delay Allowing Solutions of a Special Form
  3.
Exact Solutions of Reaction–Diffusion Type PDEs
3.1.
Reaction–Diffusion Equations with Spatially Anisotropic Time Delay
3.2.
Reaction–Diffusion Equations with Proportional Anisotropic Time Delay
  4.
Exact Solutions of Wave-Type PDEs
4.1.
Wave-Type Equations with Spatially Anisotropic Time Delay
4.2.
Wave-Type Equations with Proportional Anisotropic Time Delay
  5.
Table of Generating PDEs with Constant or Proportional Delay
  6.
Brief Conclusions
  •  References

1. Introduction

1.1. Differential Equations with Delay: Brief Overview

Hereditary systems are characterized by the dependence of the state of the system on a period or a certain moment in the past. Such systems are often modeled by introducing functions with delayed arguments into partial differential equations (PDEs). Let u = u ( x , t ) be the unknown function and w be the function with time delay. Then, we have several different possibilities:
(i)
PDEs with constant delay (or, usually, PDEs with delay) contain a function w of the form w = u ( x , t τ ) , where τ > 0 is the constant delay time;
(ii)
PDEs with proportional delay contain a function w of the form w = u ( x , q t ) , where q is the scaling parameter, 0 < q < 1 ;
(iii)
PDEs with variable delay contain a function w of the form w = u ( x , t τ ( t ) ) , where τ ( t ) > 0 is the variable delay.
Remark 1.
Delays of types (i), (ii), or (iii) can also occur in the argument x.
Remark 2.
If there is no dependence on x, one can easily have similar items for delay ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
In more complex cases, the variable delay can depend either on the spatial coordinate, i.e., be spatially anisotropic, τ = τ ( x ) , or on both spatial and time arguments, τ = τ ( x , t ) , or even on both arguments and the desired solution, τ = τ ( x , t , u ) . In this article, for the first time, we study exact solutions and reductions of PDEs with spatially anisotropic time delay τ = τ ( x ) .
Table 1 presents some common and specific differential equations with delay found in the literature. These equations arise in population theory, medicine, economics, epidemiology, biology, chemistry, control theory, theory of artificial neural networks, and many other fields. In the column “References/Comments”, there are publications devoted to applications of differential equations with delay, exact solutions, numerical methods, etc. Note that in Table 1, for brevity and uniformity, we use the term “proportional argument” regardless of the values of the scaling parameters p > 0 or q > 0 (although if 0 < p < 1 or 0 < q < 1 , the term “proportional delay” is usually used); and “with delay” means “with constant delay”.
Some specific mathematical models with delay can be found in [14,34,98,99]. Symmetries, linearizations, and some exact solutions of complex first- and second-order ODEs with delay are studied in [100,101,102]. Exact solutions to nonlinear time-fractional PDEs with delay are considered in [103,104].
The monograph [105] gathers the latest results on exact solutions, provides some fundamental theory, and describes certain models and numerical methods for delay ODEs and PDEs. Many of the equations listed in Table 1 are also considered in [105].
PDEs with two independent variables, x and t, and constant delay generally admit traveling-wave solutions, u = u ( z ) , where z = k x + λ t [55,106,107,108], and do not have self-similar solutions, u = t α U ( y ) , where y = x t β . Additive, multiplicative, and generalized separable solutions and more complex solutions of PDEs with constant or varying delays are obtained in [27,31,32,33,78,79,91,92,93,94,95,97,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117] (for a brief overview of publications on exact solutions, see [97,99]). In contrast, PDEs with one proportional delay do not have traveling-wave solutions but can admit self-similar ones. These and more complex solutions are constructed in [83,84,97,118].
Note that for finding exact solutions to nonlinear PDEs with constant or variable delay, most of the analytical methods that are effective for nonlinear PDEs without delay are either inapplicable or their applicability is very limited.

1.2. PDEs with Spatially Anisotropic Time Delay. Reductions. Exact Solutions

In this article, by saying a PDE with spatially anisotropic time delay (briefly, a PDE with anisotropic time delay) we mean a functional-differential equation that, in addition to the desired function u ( x , t ) , also contains a delayed function of the form u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) , where τ ( x ) is a given positive function, and partial derivatives of u with respect to x and t. PDEs with an anisotropic time delay can model delay systems in anisotropic and inhomogeneous media, in which the signal propagation speed depends on the chosen direction or varies at different points of the medium. For example, in medicine, this can be differences in the rate of transmission of a nerve impulse in “healthy” and “sick” tissues of the human body.
Approaches to constructing solutions to a mathematical equation based on solutions to simpler equations are usually called reductions. One-dimensional reductions are the most important for nonlinear PDEs; using them, one can obtain solutions for these PDEs in terms of much simpler solutions to ODEs. Furthermore, reductions of various differential and functional-differential equations play a key role in constructing their exact solutions.
By exact solutions of a nonlinear PDE with anisotropic time delay, we understand solutions that can be expressed via elementary functions, functions included in the PDE under consideration, indefinite integrals, or/and solutions of some ODEs without delay (systems of such ODEs). It is important to note that the exact solutions to nonlinear equations of mathematical physics and related PDEs (both with and without delay) play an essential role in ’mathematical standards’, which are widely used to assess the accuracy, verify, and develop various numerical, asymptotic, and approximate analytical methods.
Reductions and exact solutions for nonlinear PDEs with constant, proportional, or variable time delay of the form τ = τ ( t ) are usually constructed using the method of separation of variables [119,120,121], modifications of the method of functional constraints [31,79], the principle of analogy of solutions [80,81,83,84,97,118], or combinations of these methods. As a result, many reductions and exact solutions have been obtained.

2. Approaches to Constructing Exact Solutions

2.1. Constructing Solutions to Complex Equations Using Solutions of Simpler Equations

It should be noted that at present, there are no methods for constructing exact solutions to nonlinear PDEs with spatially anisotropic time delay and related functional PDEs (the methods mentioned at the end of Section 1.2 are not applicable to such equations).
In this article, to construct exact solutions to such equations, we use a simple but very important proposition, namely, exact solutions of certain PDEs with constant delay can serve as the basis for constructing solutions to more complex PDEs with variable anisotropic delay (a somewhat similar approach was used in [80,81,83,84,118] to construct solutions to nonlinear PDEs with constant or proportional delay using solutions of simpler nondelay PDEs and was referred to as the principle of analogy of solutions). This approach to constructing exact solutions, using the principle “from simple to complex”, is illustrated below with specific examples.
Example 1.
Consider a delay reaction–diffusion equation with power-law nonlinearity,
u t = a u x x + b ( u w ) k , w = u ( x , t τ ) ,
where the time delay τ > 0 is a constant.
It is easy to verify that Equation (1) admits an additive separable solution of the form
u = c t + ψ ( x ) ,
where c is an arbitrary constant and the function ψ = ψ ( x ) satisfies the second-order linear ODE
a ψ x x + b ( c τ ) k c = 0 .
Its general solution is written as:
ψ = 1 2 a [ c b ( c τ ) k ] x 2 + C 1 x + C 2 ,
where C 1 and C 2 are arbitrary constants.
A more complex reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic delay obtained from (1) by formally replacing the constant τ with an arbitrary function τ ( x ) (using the principle “from simple to complex”), namely:
u t = a u x x + b ( u w ) k , w = u x , t τ ( x ) ,
admits an exact solution of the same form (2) with the function ψ = ψ ( x ) satisfying the second-order linear ODE:
a ψ x x + b [ c τ ( x ) ] k c = 0 ,
which is easily integrated.
Thus, in this case, we can say that a solution of the simpler PDE (1) generates a solution to the more complex PDE (3).
A reaction–diffusion equation with spatially anisotropic time delay, more general than (3), is considered below (see Equation (12)).
For clarity, the procedure for constructing exact solutions to PDEs with anisotropic delay based on exact solutions of simpler PDEs with constant delay, which was used in Example 1 and will be used further, is schematically shown in Figure 1.

2.2. PDEs with Anisotropic Time Delay Allowing Solutions of a Special Form

Functional PDEs with anisotropic time delay and their exact solutions in some cases can be found by analogy from simpler PDEs with a constant delay that allow solutions of the form:
F ( u ) = k t + θ ( x ) or F ( u ) = e k t θ ( x ) ,
and satisfy the following two conditions:
(i)
The original simpler PDEs with constant delay (similar equations are called generating equations later) are reduced to ODEs depending only on the spatial argument x;
(ii)
Parameters and functional coefficients of original PDEs with constant delay do not explicitly depend on τ .
In the simplest cases, in solutions (4), we have F ( u ) = u . Forms of exact solutions other than (4) are also considered.
In the following section, we present new exact solutions and reductions to linear and nonlinear PDEs with anisotropic time delay. We describe complex delay PDEs that admit additive, multiplicative, functional, and generalized separable solutions [120,121]. Special attention is paid to nonlinear PDEs of a rather general form involving arbitrary functions. Exact solutions of such equations are of primary interest because they can be used as test problems for the verification of various approximate analytical and numerical methods.
We give only the final results without intermediate calculations (the generating equations used will be given later in Section 5). The obtained solutions are easily verified by direct substitutions into the considered equations.
Remark 3.
This article does not consider both the simplest solutions of the form u = c o n s t and degenerate solutions with only one of the two independent variables.
Remark 4.
Notably, any PDEs with anisotropic time delay admit neither traveling-wave solutions nor self-similar solutions.
Remark 5.
In all the equations discussed in this article, it is assumed that the anisotropic time delay τ ( x ) is an arbitrary positive function.

3. Exact Solutions of Reaction–Diffusion Type PDEs

3.1. Reaction–Diffusion Equations with Spatially Anisotropic Time Delay

Equation (1). Consider a linear reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic time delay of the form:
u t = a u x x + b u + c w , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where b and c are free parameters.
1 . Equation (5) admits a multiplicative separable exact solution,
u = e λ t φ ( x ) ,
where λ is an arbitrary constant and the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfies the linear ODE:
a φ x x + ( b λ + c e λ τ ( x ) ) φ = 0 .
Solution (6) and other solutions below are obtained by analogy from a corresponding simpler generating PDE. It has the form of (5) with a constant delay τ ( x ) τ = const .
2 . Equation (5) also admits a generalized separable exact solution, periodic in t,
u = φ ( x ) cos ( λ t ) + ψ ( x ) sin ( λ t ) ,
where the functions φ = φ ( x ) and ψ = ψ ( x ) are described by the linear system of ODEs:
a φ x x + [ b + c cos ( λ τ ) ] φ [ λ + c sin ( λ τ ) ] ψ = 0 , τ = τ ( x ) , a ψ x x + [ b + c cos ( λ τ ) ] ψ + [ λ + c sin ( λ τ ) ] φ = 0 .
3 .Another generalized separable solution, linear in t, has the form:
u = φ ( x ) t + ψ ( x ) ,
where the functions φ = φ ( x ) and ψ = ψ ( x ) are described by the linear system of ODEs:
a φ x x + ( b + c ) φ = 0 , a ψ x x + ( b + c ) ψ [ c τ ( x ) + 1 ] φ = 0 ,
which can be easily integrated sequentially (since the first ODE is homogeneous, and the second is nonhomogeneous).
4 . There are also solutions of the polynomial form in t,
u = k = 0 n φ k ( x ) t k ,
where n is an arbitrary positive integer and the functions φ k ( x ) are described by a system of ODEs.
Remark 6.
For all the PDEs with anisotropic time delay, which are discussed below, the corresponding simpler generating PDEs with constant delay are listed in Section 5.
Equation (2). Consider a reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic time delay,
u t = a u x x + u f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) is an arbitrary function that is nonlinear, in general.
Equation (9) has a multiplicative separable solution of the form (6), where the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfies the second-order linear ODE:
a φ x x λ φ + φ f ( e λ τ ( x ) ) = 0 .
Equation (3). An equation more complex than (9),
u t = [ a ( x ) u x ] x + b ( x ) u x + u f ( x , w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
admits a solution of the form (6) with the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfying the second-order linear ODE:
a ( x ) φ x x + [ a ( x ) + b ( x ) ] φ x λ φ + φ f ( x , e λ τ ( x ) ) = 0 .
Equation (4). Consider a reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic time delay of the form:
u t = a u x x + f ( u w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) is an arbitrary function that is nonlinear, in general.
Equation (12) admits a generalized separable solution of the form (8),
u = ( A x + B ) t + ψ ( x ) ,
where A and B are arbitrary constants and the function ψ = ψ ( x ) satisfies the second-order linear ODE:
a ψ x x + f ( A x + B ) τ ( x ) A x B = 0 ,
which can be easily integrated.
Equation (5). Consider a reaction–diffusion equation more complex than (12),
u t = a u x x + u f ( u w ) + w g ( u w ) + h ( u w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) , g ( z ) , and h ( z ) are arbitrary functions that are nonlinear, in general.
Equation (13) admits a generalized separable solution of the form (8), which is linear in t, with the functions φ = φ ( x ) and ψ = ψ ( x ) being described by the nonlinear system of ODEs:
a φ x x + φ [ f ( φ τ ) + g ( φ τ ) ] = 0 , τ = τ ( x ) , a ψ x x + ψ [ f ( φ τ ) + g ( φ τ ) ] + h ( φ τ ) φ [ 1 + τ g ( φ τ ) ] = 0 .
The first equation of this system is independent.
Equation (6). The reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic time delay (13) is further generalized by the equation:
u t = [ a ( x ) u x ] x + u f ( x , u w ) + w g ( x , u w ) + h ( x , u w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) .
This equation admits a generalized separable solution of the form (8) with the functions φ = φ ( x ) and ψ = ψ ( x ) satisfying the nonlinear system of ODEs:
[ a ( x ) φ x ] x + φ [ f ( x , φ τ ) + g ( x , φ τ ) ] = 0 , τ = τ ( x ) , [ a ( x ) ψ x ] x + ψ [ f ( x , φ τ ) + g ( x , φ τ ) ] + h ( x , φ τ ) φ [ 1 + τ g ( x , φ τ ) ] = 0 .
The first equation of this system is independent.
Equation (7). The reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic time delay and nonlinear transfer coefficient of power-law type:
u t = a ( u k u x ) x + b u + u k + 1 f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
admits a multiplicative separable exact solution,
u = e b t φ ( x ) ,
where the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfies the nonlinear second-order ODE:
a ( φ k φ x ) x + φ k + 1 f e b τ ( x ) = 0 .
This ODE allows linearization using the substitution θ = φ k + 1 .
Remark 7.
Arbitrary function f in Equation (14) can additionally depend on x.
Equation (8). The nonlinear reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic time delay:
u t = a ( u 1 / 2 u x ) x + u 1 / 2 f ( u 1 / 2 w 1 / 2 ) + g ( u 1 / 2 w 1 / 2 ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) and g ( z ) are arbitrary functions, and it has a functional separable exact solution of the form:
u = [ φ ( x ) t + ψ ( x ) ] 2 .
To be specific, we assume that φ ( x ) > 0 and ψ ( x ) > 0 . Then, the functions φ = φ ( x ) and ψ = ψ ( x ) are described by the nonlinear ODE system:
2 a φ x x + φ f ( φ τ ) 2 φ 2 = 0 , τ = τ ( x ) , 2 a ψ + ψ f ( φ τ ) + g ( φ τ ) 2 φ ψ = 0 .
Remark 8.
Arbitrary functions f and g in Equation (15) can additionally depend on x.
Equation (9). The reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic time delay and nonlinear transfer coefficient of exponential type:
u t = a ( e λ u u x ) x + b + e λ u f ( u w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
has an additive separable solution,
u ( x , t ) = b t + φ ( x ) ,
where the function φ = φ ( x ) is described by the linear second-order ODE:
a ( e λ φ φ x ) x + e λ φ f b τ ( x ) = 0 .
The substitution θ = e λ φ reduces this equation to a linear ODE.
Remark 9.
Arbitrary function f in Equation (17) can additionally depend on x.
Equation (10). The reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic time delay and nonlinear transfer coefficient:
u t = [ a ( x ) f u ( u ) u x ] x + b f u ( u ) + g f ( u ) f ( w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) and g ( z ) are arbitrary functions, has an exact solution in implicit form,
f ( u ) = b t + θ ( x ) ,
where the function θ = θ ( x ) satisfies the linear second-order ODE:
[ a ( x ) θ x ] x + g b τ ( x ) = 0 .
The general solution of this ODE is:
θ = 1 a ( x ) g b τ ( x ) d x d x + C 1 d x a ( x ) + C 2 ,
where C 1 and C 2 are arbitrary constants.
Equation (11). The reaction–diffusion equation with anisotropic time delay and nonlinear transfer coefficient:
u t = a [ f u ( u ) u x ] x + b f ( u ) f u ( u ) + f ( u ) g f ( w ) f ( u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) and g ( z ) are arbitrary functions, has an exact solution in implicit form,
f ( u ) = e b t φ ( x ) ,
where the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfies the linear second-order ODE:
a φ x x + g e b τ ( x ) φ = 0 .
Remark 10.
Arbitrary function g in Equations (18) and (19) can additionally depend on x.

3.2. Reaction–Diffusion Equations with Proportional Anisotropic Time Delay

Equation (12). Consider a linear reaction–diffusion equation with proportional anisotropic time delay,
u t = a u x x + b u + c w , w = u ( x , p ( x ) t ) ,
where p ( x ) is any function satisfying the condition 0 < p ( x ) 1 ; b and c are free parameters.
Equation (20) admits a generalized separable solution, linear in t,
u = φ ( x ) t + ψ ( x ) ,
where the functions φ = φ ( x ) and ψ = ψ ( x ) are described by the linear system of ODEs:
a φ x x + ( b + c p ( x ) ) φ = 0 , a ψ x x + ( b + c ) ψ φ = 0 ,
which can be easily integrated.
There are also solutions of the polynomial form in t,
u = k = 0 n φ k ( x ) t k ,
where n is an arbitrary positive integer, and the functions φ k ( x ) are described by a system of ODEs.
Solutions (21) and (22) were obtained by analogy from a corresponding simpler generating PDE. It has the form of (20) with a constant scaling parameter p ( x ) p = const .
Remark 11.
For all the PDEs with proportional anisotropic time delay, which are discussed below, the corresponding simpler generating PDEs with constant scaling parameters are listed in Section 5.
Equation (13). The reaction–diffusion equation with proportional anisotropic time delay and nonlinear transfer coefficient of power-law type:
u t = a ( u k u x ) x + u k + 1 f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , p ( x ) t ) ,
where 0 < p ( x ) 1 and f ( z ) is an arbitrary function, admits a multiplicative separable exact solution,
u = t 1 / k φ ( x ) ,
where the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfies the nonlinear second-order ODE:
a ( φ k φ x ) x + φ k + 1 f ( p 1 / k ( x ) ) + 1 k φ = 0 .
Equation (14). The reaction–diffusion equation with proportional anisotropic time delay and nonlinear transfer coefficient of exponential type:
u t = a ( e λ u u x ) x + e λ u f ( u w ) , w = u ( x , p ( x ) t ) ,
where 0 < p ( x ) 1 and f ( z ) is an arbitrary function, admits an additive separable solution,
u = 1 λ ln t + φ ( x ) ,
where the function φ = φ ( x ) is described by the second-order ODE:
a ( e λ φ φ x ) x + 1 λ + e λ φ f 1 λ ln p ( x ) = 0 .
The substitution θ = e λ φ reduces this equation to a linear ODE.
Remark 12.
Arbitrary function f in Equations (23) and (24) can additionally depend on x.

4. Exact Solutions of Wave-Type PDEs

4.1. Wave-Type Equations with Spatially Anisotropic Time Delay

Equation (15). Consider a linear wave-type equation with anisotropic time delay of the form:
u t t = a u x x + b u + c w , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where b and c are free parameters.
1 . Equation (25) has a multiplicative separable exact solution,
u = e λ t φ ( x ) ,
where λ is an arbitrary constant and the function φ = φ ( x ) is described by the linear second-order ODE:
a φ x x + ( b λ 2 + c e λ τ ( x ) ) φ = 0 .
2 . Equation (25) also has a generalized separable exact solution, periodic in t,
u = φ ( x ) cos ( λ t ) + ψ ( x ) sin ( λ t ) ,
where the functions φ = φ ( x ) and ψ = ψ ( x ) satisfy the linear system of ODEs:
a φ x x + [ b + λ 2 + c cos ( λ τ ) ] φ c sin ( λ τ ) ψ = 0 , τ = τ ( x ) , a ψ x x + [ b + λ 2 + c cos ( λ τ ) ] ψ + c sin ( λ τ ) φ = 0 .
3 . There are also solutions of the polynomial form in t,
u = k = 0 n φ k ( x ) t k ,
where n is an arbitrary positive integer and the functions φ k ( x ) are described by a system of ODEs.
Equation (16). The nonlinear wave-type equation with anisotropic time delay:
u t t = a u x x + u f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where τ ( x ) > 0 and f ( z ) is an arbitrary function, admits the multiplicative separable exact solution (26) with the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfiying the linear second-order ODE:
a φ x x λ 2 φ + φ f ( e λ τ ( x ) ) = 0 .
Equation (17). A wave-type equation more complex than (27),
u t t = [ a ( x ) u x ] x + b ( x ) u x + u f ( x , w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( x , z ) is an arbitrary function, admits solution (26) with the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfying the linear second-order ODE:
a ( x ) φ x x + [ a ( x ) + b ( x ) ] φ x λ 2 φ + φ f ( x , e λ τ ( x ) ) = 0 .
Equation (18). The wave-type equation with anisotropic time delay and nonlinear speed:
u t t = a ( u k u x ) x + b u + u k + 1 f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) is an arbitrary function, admits a multiplicative separable exact solution of the form:
u = e ± b t φ ( x ) ,
where the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfies the ODE:
a ( φ k φ x ) x + φ k + 1 f e b τ ( x ) = 0 .
Remark 13.
Arbitrary function f in Equation (29) can additionally depend on x.
Equation (19). The wave-type equation with anisotropic time delay and nonlinear speed:
u t t = a ( u 1 / 2 u x ) x + u 1 / 2 f ( u 1 / 2 w 1 / 2 ) + g ( u 1 / 2 w 1 / 2 ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) and g ( z ) are arbitrary functions, admits a functional separable exact solution,
u = [ φ ( x ) t + ψ ( x ) ] 2 .
To be specific, we assume that φ ( x ) > 0 and ψ ( x ) > 0 . Then, the functions φ = φ ( x ) and ψ = ψ ( x ) are described by the nonlinear system of ODEs:
2 a φ x x + φ f ( φ τ ) = 0 , τ = τ ( x ) , 2 a ψ + ψ f ( φ τ ) + g ( φ τ ) 2 φ 2 = 0 .
The first equation is independent.
Remark 14.
Arbitrary functions f and g in Equation (30) can additionally depend on x.
Equation (20). The wave-type equation with anisotropic time delay and nonlinear speed:
u t t = [ a ( x ) f u ( u ) u x ] x b 2 f u u ( f u ) 3 + g f ( u ) f ( w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) and g ( z ) are arbitrary functions, has an exact solution in implicit form,
f ( u ) = b t + θ ( x ) ,
with the function θ = θ ( x ) satisfying the linear second-order ODE:
[ a ( x ) θ x ] x + g b τ ( x ) = 0 .
The general solution of this ODE is:
θ = 1 a ( x ) g b τ ( x ) d x d x + C 1 d x a ( x ) + C 2 ,
where C 1 and C 2 are arbitrary constants.
Equation (21). The wave-type equation with anisotropic time delay and nonlinear speed:
u t t = [ a ( x ) f u u x ] x + b 2 f f u 1 f f u u ( f u ) 2 + f g f ¯ f , f ¯ = f ( w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) ,
where f ( z ) and g ( z ) are arbitrary functions, has an exact solution in implicit form,
f ( u ) = e b t φ ( x ) ,
with the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfying the linear second-order ODE:
[ a ( x ) φ x ] x + g e b τ ( x ) φ = 0 .

4.2. Wave-Type Equations with Proportional Anisotropic Time Delay

Equation (22). Consider a linear wave-type PDE with proportional anisotropic time delay,
u t t = a u x x + b u + c w , w = u ( x , p ( x ) t ) ,
where p ( x ) is a function satisfying the condition 0 < p ( x ) 1 ; b and c are free parameters.
Equation (32) admits a generalized separable solution,
u = φ ( x ) t 2 + ψ ( x ) ,
where the functions φ = φ ( x ) and ψ = ψ ( x ) are described by the linear system of ODEs:
a φ x x + ( b + c p 2 ( x ) ) φ = 0 , a ψ x x + ( b + c ) ψ 2 φ = 0 ,
which can be easily integrated sequentially.
There are also solutions of the polynomial form in t,
u = k = 0 n φ k ( x ) t k ,
where n is an arbitrary positive integer and the φ k ( x ) are described by a system of ODEs.
Equation (23). The wave PDE with proportional anisotropic time delay and nonlinear speed of power-law type:
u t t = a ( u k u x ) x + u k + 1 f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , p ( x ) t ) ,
where 0 < p ( x ) 1 and f ( z ) is an arbitrary function, admits a multiplicative separable exact solution,
u = t 2 / k φ ( x ) ,
where the function φ = φ ( x ) satisfies the nonlinear second-order ODE:
a ( φ k φ x ) x + φ k + 1 f ( p 2 / k ) 2 ( 2 + k ) k 2 φ = 0 , p = p ( x ) .
Equation (24). The wave PDE with proportional anisotropic time delay and nonlinear speed of exponential type:
u t t = a ( e λ u u x ) x + e λ u f ( u w ) , w = u ( x , p ( x ) t ) ,
where 0 < p ( x ) 1 and f ( z ) is an arbitrary function, admits an additive separable solution,
u = 2 λ ln t + φ ( x ) ,
where the function φ = φ ( x ) is described by the nonlinear second-order ODE:
a ( e λ φ φ x ) x 2 λ + e λ φ f 2 λ ln p = 0 , p = p ( x ) .
The substitution θ = e λ φ reduces this equation to a linear ODE.

5. Table of Generating PDEs with Constant or Proportional Delay

Table 2 presents generating PDEs with constant or proportional delay and references to publications that include these equations and their exact solutions. In the absence of such publications, reference is made to the equation from this article.
These equations were used to construct the more complex PDEs with anisotropic time delay described in Section 3 and Section 4.
Remark 15.
Some generating equations in Table 2 are less general than those considered in the corresponding references. For example, in [79], we have the delay PDE:
u t = a ( u k u x ) x + u f ( w / u ) + u k + 1 g ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) ,
which is the generating equation in row 7 with f ( z ) b .

6. Brief Conclusions

We have considered linear and nonlinear reaction–diffusion and wave-type PDEs with anisotropic (spatially variable) time delay that involve, in addition to the unknown function u ( x , t ) , functions of the form u ( x , t τ ( x ) ) , where τ ( x ) > 0 is the anisotropic time delay. Equations of a fairly general form containing one, two, or more arbitrary functions have been analyzed. Reaction–diffusion and wave-type PDEs with proportional anisotropic time delays that involve u ( x , p ( x ) t ) , where 0 < p ( x ) < 1 , have also been presented. Additive, multiplicative, functional, and generalized separable solutions of such equations with complicated delays have been described. The results of the article can be used for testing numerical and approximate analytical methods of solving complex PDEs with variable delay and related functional PDEs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.P.; methodology, A.D.P. and V.G.S.; validation, V.G.S.; investigation, A.D.P. and V.G.S.; writing—original draft preparation, V.G.S.; writing—review and editing, A.D.P. and V.G.S.; supervision, A.D.P.; project administration, A.D.P.; funding acquisition, A.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation within the framework of the State Assignment (Reg. No. 123021700057-0).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hutchinson, G.E. Circular causal systems in ecology. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1948, 50, 221–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mackey, M.C.; Glass, L. Oscillation and chaos in physiological control system. Science 1977, 197, 287–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cooke, K.L. Stability analysis for a vector disease model. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 1979, 9, 31–42. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/44238836 (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  4. Gurney, W.S.C.; Blythe, S.P.; Nisbet, R.M. Nicholson’s blowflies revisited. Nature 1980, 287, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Suarez, M.J.; Schopf, P.S. A delayed action oscillator for ENSO. J. Atmos. Sci. 1988, 45, 3283–3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beretta, E.; Takeuchi, Y. Global stability of an SIR epidemic model with time delays. J. Math. Biol. 1995, 33, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Herz, A.V.; Bonhoeffer, S.; Anderson, R.M.; May, R.M.; Nowak, M.A. Viral dynamics in vivo: Limitations on estimates of intracellular delay and virus decay. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 7247–7251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gourley, S.A.; Chaplain, M.A.J. Travelling fronts in a food-limited population model with time delay. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. A 2002, 132, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nelson, P.W.; Perelson, A.S. Mathematical analysis of delay differential equation models of HIV-1 infection. Math. Biosci. 2002, 179, 73–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arik, S. Global asymptotic stability of a larger class of neural networks with constant time delay. Phys. Lett. A 2003, 311, 504–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cesare, L.D.; Sportelli, M. A dynamic IS-LM model with delayed taxation revenues. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2005, 25, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gourley, S.A.; Kuang, Y.; Nagy, J.D. Dynamics of a delay differential equation model of hepatitis B virus infection. J. Biol. Dynam. 2008, 2, 140–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Berezansky, L.; Braverman, E.; Idels, L. Nicholson’s blowflies differential equations revisited: Main results and open problems. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34, 1405–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kuang, Y. Delay Differential Equations with Applications in Population Dynamics; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, B. New results on the positive almost periodic solutions for a model of hematopoiesis. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2014, 17, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, J.; Campbell, S.A.; Bélair, J. Time-delayed neural networks: Stability and oscillations. In Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 2966–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schiesser, W.E. Time Delay ODE/PDE Models: Applications in Biomedical Science and Engineering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, X.; Zhu, H. Hopf bifurcation and chaos of a delayed finance system. Complexity 2019, 2019, 6715036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, W. Modeling COVID-19 pandemic with hierarchical quarantine and time delay. Dyn. Games Appl. 2021, 11, 892–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. González-Parra, G.; Sultana, S.; Arenas, A.J. Mathematical modeling of toxoplasmosis considering a time delay in the infectivity of oocysts. Mathematics 2022, 10, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kalmár-Nagy, T.; Stépán, G.; Moon, F.C. Subcritical HOPF bifurcation in the delay equation model for machine tool vibrations. Nonlinear Dyn. 2001, 26, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dehghan, M.; Shakeri, F. The use of the decomposition procedure of Adomian for solving a delay differential equation arising in electrodynamics. Phys. Scr. 2008, 78, 065004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hall, A.J.; Wake, G.C. A functional differential equation arising in the modelling of cell growth. J. Aust. Math. Soc. Ser. B Appl. Math. 1989, 30, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Derfel, G.; van Brunt, B.; Wake, G.C. A cell growth model revisited. Funct. Differ. Equat. 2012, 19, 71–81. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10179/9757 (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  25. Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y. State estimation of neural networks with both time-varying delays and norm-bounded parameter uncertainties via a delay decomposition approach. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2013, 18, 3517–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pimenov, V.; Sviridov, S. Numerical methods for advection equations with delay. AIP Conf. Proc. 2014, 1631, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tanthanuch, J. Symmetry analysis of the nonhomogeneous inviscid Burgers equation with delay. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 2012, 17, 4978–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zaidi, A.A.; van Brunt, B.; Wake, G.C. Solutions to an advanced functional partial differential equation of the pantograph type. Proc. R. Soc. A 2015, 471, 20140947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Solodushkin, S.I.; Yumanova, I.F.; Staelen, R.D. First-order partial differential equations with time delay and retardation of a state variable. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2015, 289, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mackey, M.C.; Rudnicki, R. A new criterion for the global stability of simultaneous cell replication and maturation processes. J. Math. Biol. 1999, 38, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. Functional constraints method for constructing exact solutions to delay reaction-diffusion equations and more complex nonlinear equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2014, 19, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. New generalized and functional separable solutions to nonlinear delay reaction-diffusion equations. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2014, 59, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. Exact separable solutions of delay reaction-diffusion equations and other nonlinear partial functional-differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2014, 19, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G.; Vyazmin, A.V. Reaction-diffusion models with delay: Some properties, equations, problems, and solutions. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 2018, 52, 334–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, J.; Zou, X. Traveling wave fronts of reaction-diffusion systems with delay. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 2001, 13, 651–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, S. Traveling wavefronts for delayed reaction-diffusion systems via a fixed point theorem. J. Differ. Equ. 2001, 171, 294–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Huang, J.; Zou, X. Traveling wavefronts in diffusive and cooperative Lotka—Volterra system with delays. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 271, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kuang, Y.; Gourley, S.A. Wavefronts and global stability in a time-delayed population model with stage structure. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 2003, 459, 1563–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mei, M.; So, J.; Li, M.; Shen, S. Asymptotic stability of travelling waves for Nicholson’s blowflies equation with diffusion. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 2004, 134, 579–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Faria, T.; Trofimchuk, S. Nonmonotone travelling waves in a single species reaction–diffusion equation with delay. J. Differ. Equ. 2006, 228, 357–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Trofimchuk, E.; Tkachenko, V.; Trofimchuk, S. Slowly oscillating wave solutions of a single species reaction–diffusion equation with delay. J. Differ. Equ. 2008, 245, 2307–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lin, G.; Li, W.-T. Travelling wavefronts of Belousov—Zhabotinskii system with diffusion and delay. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lv, G.; Wang, M. Traveling wave front in diffusive and competitive Lotka—Volterra system with delays. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2010, 11, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ling, Z.; Lin, Z. Traveling wavefront in a Hematopoiesis model with time delay. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Yang, J.; Liang, S.; Zhang, Y. Travelling waves of a delayed SIR epidemic model with nonlinear incidence rate and spatial diffusion. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gan, Q.; Xu, R.; Yang, P. Travelling waves of a delayed SIRS epidemic model with spatial diffusion. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2011, 12, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Trofimchuk, E.; Pinto, M.; Trofimchuk, S. Traveling waves for a model of the Belousov—Zhabotinsky reaction. J. Differ. Equ. 2013, 254, 3690–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Xu, Z. Traveling waves in a Kermack—Mckendrick epidemic model with diffusion and latent period. Nonlinear Anal. 2014, 111, 66–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ling, Z.; Zhu, L. Traveling wavefronts of a diffusive hematopoiesis model with time delay. Appl. Math. 2014, 5, 2172–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Bai, Z.; Wu, S.-L. Traveling waves in a delayed SIR epidemic model with nonlinear incidence. Appl. Meth. Comput. 2015, 263, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cheng, Y.; Lu, D.; Zhou, J.; Wei, J. Existence of traveling wave solutions with critical speed in a delayed diffusive epidemic model. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019, 2019, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, G.-B. Asymptotics and uniqueness of traveling wavefronts for a delayed model of the Belousov—Zhabotinsky reaction. Appl. Anal. 2020, 99, 1639–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ramirez-Carrasco, C.; Molina-Garay, J. Existence and approximation of traveling wavefronts for the diffusive Mackey—Glass equation. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2021, 18, 2. Available online: https://ajmaa.org/searchroot/files/pdf/v18n1/v18i1p2.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  54. Wang, P.K.C. Asymptotic stability of a time-delayed diffusion system. J. Appl. Mech. 1963, 30, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, J. Theory and Applications of Partial Functional Differential Equations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  56. So, J.W.-H.; Yang, Y. Dirichlet problem for the diffusive Nicholson’s blowflies equation. J. Differ. Equ. 1998, 150, 317–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Davidson, F.A.; Gourley, S.A. The effects of temporal delays in a model for a food-limited, diffusing population. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2001, 261, 633–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Faria, T. Stability and bifurcation for a delayed predator–prey model and the effect of diffusion. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2001, 254, 433–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pao, C. Global asymptotic stability of Lotka—Volterra competition systems with diffusion and time delays. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2004, 5, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vandewalle, S.; Gander, M.J. Optimized overlapping Schwarz methods for parabolic PDEs with time-delay. In Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Saker, S.H. Oscillation of continuous and discrete diffusive delay Nicholson’s blowflies models. Appl. Math. Comput. 2005, 167, 179–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, X.; Li, Z. Dynamics for a type of general reaction-diffusion model. Nonlinear Analysis 2007, 67, 2699–2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lu, J.G. Global exponential stability and periodicity of reaction–diffusion delayed recurrent neural networks with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2008, 35, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yi, T.; Zou, X. Global attractivity of the diffusive Nicholson blowflies equation with Neumann boundary condition: A non-monotone case. J. Differ. Equ. 2008, 245, 3376–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Li, W.-T.; Yan, X.-P.; Zhang, C.-H. Stability and Hopf bifurcation for a delayed cooperation diffusion system with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2008, 38, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Su, Y.; Wei, J.; Shi, J. Hopf bifurcation in a reaction-diffusion population model with delay effect. J. Differ. Equ. 2009, 247, 1156–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.X. Oscillation for a class of diffusive hematopoiesis model with several arguments. Acta Math. Sin. Eng. Ser. 2012, 28, 2345–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Piotrowska, M.J.; Foryś, U.; Bodnar, M.; Poleszczuk, J. A simple model of carcinogenic mutations with time delay and diffusion. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2013, 10, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hattaf, K.; Yousfi, N. Global dynamics of a delay reaction–diffusion model for viral infection with specific functional response. Comput. Appl. Math. 2015, 34, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, J.; Sun, G.-Q.; Jin, Z. Pattern formation of an epidemic model with time delay. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2014, 403, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hattaf, K.; Yousfi, N. A generalized HBV model with diffusion and two delays. Comput. Math. Appl. 2015, 69, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, P.-P. Periodic solutions in an epidemic model with diffusion and delay. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 265, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cai, Y.; Yan, S.; Wang, H.; Lian, X.; Wang, W. Spatiotemporal dynamics in a reaction-diffusion epidemic model with a time-delay in transmission. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 2015, 25, 1550099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pan, X.; Shu, H.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.-S. Dirichlet problem for a delayed diffusive hematopoiesis model. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2019, 48, 493–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jia, Y. Bifurcation and pattern formation of a tumor–immune model with time-delay and diffusion. Math. Comput. Simul. 2020, 178, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Al Noufaey, K.S. Stability analysis of a diffusive three-species ecological system with time delays. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhu, C.-C.; Zhu, J. Dynamic analysis of a delayed COVID-19 epidemic with home quarantine in temporal-spatial heterogeneous via global exponential attractor method. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 143, 110546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. Nonlinear delay reaction-diffusion equations with varying transfer coefficients: Exact methods and new solutions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2014, 37, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. The functional constraints method: Application to non-linear delay reaction-diffusion equations with varying transfer coefficients. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2014, 67, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G. A method for constructing exact solutions of nonlinear delay PDEs. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2021, 494, 124619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G. Construction of exact solutions to nonlinear PDEs with delay using solutions of simpler PDEs without delay. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2021, 95, 105634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yang, X.; Song, Q.; Cao, J.; Lu, J. Synchronization of coupled Markovian reaction-diffusion neural networks with proportional delays via quantized control. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2019, 30, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G. Nonlinear pantograph-type diffusion PDEs: Exact solutions and the principle of analogy. Mathematics 2021, 9, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Aksenov, A.V.; Polyanin, A.D. Methods for constructing complex solutions of nonlinear PDEs using simpler solutions. Mathematics 2021, 9, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liang, J.; Cao, J. Global exponential stability of reaction-diffusion recurrent neural networks with time-varying delays. Phys. Lett. A 2003, 314, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lou, X.-Y.; Cui, B.-T. Asymptotic synchronization of a class of neural networks with reaction-diffusion terms and time-varying delays. Comput. Math. Appl. 2006, 52, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Wang, L.; Gao, Y. Global exponential robust stability of reaction–diffusion interval neural networks with time-varying delays. Phys. Lett. A 2006, 350, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yang, Z.; Xu, D. Global dynamics for non-autonomous reaction-diffusion neural networks with time-varying delays. Theor. Comput. Sci. 2008, 403, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Wang, K.; Teng, Z.; Jiang, H. Global exponential synchronization in delayed reaction-diffusion cellular neural networks with the Dirichlet boundary conditions. Math. Comput. Model. 2010, 52, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Efendiev, M.; van Brunt, B.; Wake, G.C.; Zaidi, A.A. A functional partial differential equation arising in a cell growth model with dispersion. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2018, 41, 1541–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. Generalized and functional separable solutions to nonlinear delay Klein–Gordon equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2014, 19, 2676–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Long, F.-S.; Meleshko, S.V. On the complete group classification of the one-dimensional nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation with a delay. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2016, 39, 3255–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lobo, J.Z.; Valaulikar, Y.S. Group analysis of the one dimensional wave equation with delay. Appl. Math. Comput. 2020, 378, 125193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Long, F.-S.; Meleshko, S.V. Symmetry analysis of the nonlinear two-dimensional Klein–Gordon equation with a time-varying delay. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2017, 40, 4658–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G.; Vyazmin, A.V. Exact solutions and qualitative features of nonlinear hyperbolic reaction-diffusion equations with delay. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 2015, 49, 622–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wan, P.; Sun, D.; Chen, D.; Zhao, M.; Zheng, L. Exponential synchronization of inertial reaction-diffusion coupled neural networks with proportional delay via periodically intermittent control. Neurocomputing 2019, 356, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G. Reductions and exact solutions of nonlinear wave-type PDEs with proportional and more complex delays. Mathematics 2023, 11, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zubik-Kowal, B. Delay partial differential equations. Scholarpedia 2008, 3, 2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sorokin, V.G.; Vyazmin, A.V. Nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations with delay: Partial survey, exact solutions, test problems, and numerical integration. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dorodnitsyn, V.A.; Kozlov, R.; Meleshko, S.V.; Winternitz, P. Linear or linearizable first-order delay ordinary differential equations and their Lie point symmetries. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2018, 51, 205203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Dorodnitsyn, V.A.; Kozlov, R.; Meleshko, S.V.; Winternitz, P. Lie group classification of first-order delay ordinary differential equations. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2018, 51, 205202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Dorodnitsyn, V.A.; Kozlov, R.; Meleshko, S.V.; Winternitz, P. Second-order delay ordinary differential equations, their symmetries and application to a traffic problem. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2021, 54, 105204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Prakash, P.; Choudhary, S.; Daftardar-Gejji, V. Exact solutions of generalized nonlinear time-fractional reaction-diffusion equations with time delay. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2020, 135, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Prakash, P.; Priyendhu, K.S.; Anjitha, K.M. Initial value problem for the (2+1)-dimensional time-fractional generalized convection-reaction-diffusion wave equation: Invariant subspaces and exact solutions. Comp. Appl. Math. 2022, 41, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G.; Zhurov, A.I. Delay Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  106. Mei, M.; Lin, C.-K.; Lin, C.-T.; So, J.W.-H. Traveling wavefronts for time-delayed reaction-diffusion equation: (I) Local nonlinearity. J. Differ. Equ. 2009, 247, 495–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G. Nonlinear delay reaction-diffusion equations: Traveling-wave solutions in elementary functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2015, 46, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lv, G.; Wang, Z. Stability of traveling wave solutions to delayed evolution equation. J. Dyn. Control Syst. 2015, 21, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Meleshko, S.V.; Moyo, S. On the complete group classification of the reaction-diffusion equation with a delay. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 338, 448–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. Exact solutions of linear and nonlinear differential-difference heat and diffusion equations with finite relaxation time. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2013, 54, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. Non-linear instability and exact solutions to some delay reaction-diffusion systems. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2014, 62, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. The generating equations method: Constructing exact solutions to delay reaction-diffusion systems and other non-linear coupled delay PDEs. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2015, 71, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Polyanin, A.D. Generalized traveling-wave solutions of nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations with delay and variable coefficients. Appl. Math. Lett. 2019, 90, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G. New exact solutions of nonlinear wave type PDEs with delay. Appl. Math. Lett. 2020, 108, 106512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Aibinu, M.O.; Thakur, S.C.; Moyo, S. Exact solutions of nonlinear delay reaction-diffusion equations with variable coefficients. Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 2021, 4, 100170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. Multi-parameter reaction-diffusion systems with quadratic nonlinearity and delays: New exact solutions in elementary functions. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G. Reductions and exact solutions of Lotka—Volterra and more complex reaction-diffusion systems with delays. Appl. Math. Lett. 2022, 125, 107731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Aksenov, A.V.; Polyanin, A.D. Review of methods for constructing exact solutions of equations of mathematical physics based on simpler solutions. Theor. Math. Phys. 2022, 211, 567–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Galaktionov, V.A.; Svirshchevskii, S.R. Exact Solutions and Invariant Subspaces of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations in Mechanics and Physics; Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  120. Polyanin, A.D.; Zaitsev, V.F. Handbook of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  121. Polyanin, A.D.; Zhurov, A.I. Separation of Variables and Exact Solutions of Nonlinear PDEs; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A schematic of using exact solutions of PDEs with constant delay to construct exact solutions to PDEs with anisotropic delay.
Figure 1. A schematic of using exact solutions of PDEs with constant delay to construct exact solutions to PDEs with anisotropic delay.
Mathematics 11 03111 g001
Table 1. Some functional differential equations (ODEs and PDEs) with delays of different types.
Table 1. Some functional differential equations (ODEs and PDEs) with delays of different types.
Type of EquationForm of EquationReferences/Comments
First-order ODE with delay u t = f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( t τ )
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]
Second-order ODE with delay u t t + c u t = f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ )
[21]
First-order ODE with proportional argument u t = a u + b w ,
w = u ( q t )
0 < q < 1 : [22]
q > 1 : [23,24]
First-order ODE with variable delay u t = f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ ( t ) )
[25]
First-order PDE with delay u t + u x = f ( x , t , u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ )
[26]
First-order Hopf-type PDE with delay u t + u u x = f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ )
[27]
First-order PDE with proportional argument u t + u x = a u + b w ,
w = u ( p x , t )
p > 1 : [28]
First-order PDE with delay and proportional argument u t + c u x = f ( x , t , u , w ) ,
w = u ( p x , t τ )
0 < p < 1 : [29]
First-order PDE with constant time delay and variable space delay u t + g ( x ) u x = f ( t , u , w ) ,
w = u ( ξ ( x ) , t τ )
[30]
Reaction–diffusion PDE with delay u t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ )
Exact solutions
construction: [31,32,33,34]
Traveling waves
analysis: [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]
Other topics: [17,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]
Reaction–diffusion PDE with delay and variable transfer coefficient u t = [ g ( u ) u x ] x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ )
[78,79,80,81]
Reaction–diffusion PDE with proportional argument u t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , q t )
[82,83]
Reaction–diffusion PDE with proportional argument u t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( p x , t )
[83]
Reaction–diffusion PDE with proportional arguments u t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( p x , q t )
[83,84]
Reaction–diffusion PDE with variable delay u t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ ( t ) )
[31,33,84,85,86,87,88,89]
Fokker–Planck type PDE with proportional argument u t + c u x = a u x x + b u + k w ,
w = u ( p x , t )
p > 1 : [90]
Wave-type PDE with delay u t t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ )
[91,92,93]
Wave-type PDE with variable delay u t t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ ( t ) )
[94]
Telegraph type PDE with delay u t t + u t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , t τ )
[95]
Telegraph type PDE with proportional argument u t t + c u t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , q t )
0 < q < 1 : [96]
Wave-type PDE with proportional argument u t t = a u x x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( x , q t )
[97]
Wave-type PDE with nonlinear speed and proportional arguments u t t = [ g ( u ) u x ] x + f ( u , w ) ,
w = u ( p x , q t )
[97]
Table 2. Generating PDEs with constant or proportional delay.
Table 2. Generating PDEs with constant or proportional delay.
No.Form of EquationReferences/Comments
1 u t = a u x x + b u + c w , w = u ( x , t τ ) Equation (5) with τ = const
2 u t = a u x x + u f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [31,33]
3 u t = [ a ( x ) u x ] x + b ( x ) u x + u f ( x , w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [31]
4 u t = a u x x + f ( u w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [31,33]
5 u t = a u x x + u f ( u w ) + w g ( u w ) + h ( u w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [33]
6 u t = [ a ( x ) u x ] x + u f ( x , u w ) + w g ( x , u w ) + h ( x , u w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [31]
7 u t = a ( u k u x ) x + b u + u k + 1 f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [79]
8 u t = a ( u 1 / 2 u x ) x + u 1 / 2 f ( u 1 / 2 w 1 / 2 ) + g ( u 1 / 2 w 1 / 2 ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [79]
9 u t = a ( e λ u u x ) x + b + e λ u f ( u w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [79]
10 u t = [ a ( x ) f u ( u ) u x ] x + b f u ( u ) + g f ( u ) f ( w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [79,80,81]
11 u t = a [ f u ( u ) u x ] x + f ( u ) g f ( w ) f ( u ) + b f ( u ) f u ( u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [79,81]
12 u t = a u x x + b u + c w , w = u ( x , p t ) Equation (20) with p = const
13 u t = a ( u k u x ) x + u k + 1 f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , p t ) [83]
14 u t = a ( e λ u u x ) x + e λ u f ( u w ) , w = u ( x , p t ) [83]
15 u t t = a u x x + b u + c w , w = u ( x , t τ ) Equation (25) with τ = const
16 u t t = a u x x + u f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [91]
17 u t t = [ a ( x ) u x ] x + b ( x ) u x + u f ( x , w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) Equation (28) with τ = const
18 u t t = a ( u k u x ) x + b u + u k + 1 f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [81]
19 u t t = a ( u 1 / 2 u x ) x + u 1 / 2 f ( u 1 / 2 w 1 / 2 ) + g ( u 1 / 2 w 1 / 2 ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [114]
20 u t t = [ a ( x ) f u ( u ) u x ] x b 2 f u u ( f u ) 3 + g f ( u ) f ( w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [80,81,114]
21 u t t = [ a ( x ) f u u x ] x + b 2 f f u 1 f f u u ( f u ) 2 + f g f ¯ f , f ¯ = f ( w ) , w = u ( x , t τ ) [81]
22 u t t = a u x x + b u + c w , w = u ( x , p t ) Equation (32) with p = const
23 u t t = a ( u k u x ) x + u k + 1 f ( w / u ) , w = u ( x , p t ) [97]
24 u t t = a ( e λ u u x ) x + e λ u f ( u w ) , w = u ( x , p t ) [97]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Polyanin, A.D.; Sorokin, V.G. Exact Solutions of Reaction–Diffusion PDEs with Anisotropic Time Delay. Mathematics 2023, 11, 3111. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11143111

AMA Style

Polyanin AD, Sorokin VG. Exact Solutions of Reaction–Diffusion PDEs with Anisotropic Time Delay. Mathematics. 2023; 11(14):3111. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11143111

Chicago/Turabian Style

Polyanin, Andrei D., and Vsevolod G. Sorokin. 2023. "Exact Solutions of Reaction–Diffusion PDEs with Anisotropic Time Delay" Mathematics 11, no. 14: 3111. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11143111

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop