Next Article in Journal
Nonparametric Threshold Estimation for Drift Function in Jump–Diffusion Model of Interest Rate Using Asymmetric Kernel
Next Article in Special Issue
On Sub Convexlike Optimization Problems
Previous Article in Journal
An End-to-End Framework Based on Vision-Language Fusion for Remote Sensing Cross-Modal Text-Image Retrieval
Previous Article in Special Issue
Properties of Coordinated h1,h2-Convex Functions of Two Variables Related to the Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér Type Inequalities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bounds for the Error in Approximating a Fractional Integral by Simpson’s Rule

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Duzce University, Düzce 81620, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2023, 11(10), 2282; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11102282
Submission received: 28 March 2023 / Revised: 12 May 2023 / Accepted: 12 May 2023 / Published: 13 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Trends in Convex Analysis and Mathematical Inequalities)

Abstract

:
Simpson’s rule is a numerical method used for approximating the definite integral of a function. In this paper, by utilizing mappings whose second derivatives are bounded, we acquire the upper and lower bounds for the Simpson-type inequalities by means of Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operators. We also study special cases of our main results. Furthermore, we give some examples with graphs to illustrate the main results. This study on fractional Simpson’s inequalities is the first paper in the literature as a method.

1. Introduction

The classical Simpson’s inequality for four times continuously differentiable functions is the following.
Theorem 1
([1]). Let f : a , b R be a four times continuously differentiable function on a , b , and let us consider f 4 = sup x a , b f 4 ( x ) < . Then, the following inequality holds:
1 3 f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 + 2 f a + b 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x 1 2880 f 4 b a 4 .
Since the theory of convex functions is an effective and useful way to solve a large number of problems from different branches of mathematics, many mathematicians have investigated the Simpson-type inequalities for convex functions. More precisely, in [1], some Simpson-type inequalities via s-convex mappings are established by utilizing differentiable mappings. Furthermore, new versions of the Simpson-type inequalities for differentiable convex mappings were established in [2,3]. The reader is referred to [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] and the references therein for more information and unexplained aspects regarding Simpson-type inequalities for various convex classes.
Many mathematicians have investigated the twice differentiable convex functions to obtain significant inequalities. For example, Sarikaya et al. proved some inequalities of Simpson’s type by using twice differentiable mappings in [11]. In addition, some Simpson-type inequalities are given for differentiable convex mappings in [12]. Moreover, the authors provide new estimates on the generalization of Hadamard, Ostrowski, and Simpson inequalities in the case of functions whose second derivatives in absolute values at certain powers are convex and quasi-convex functions in [13]. Furthermore, Simpson-type inequalities are established for P convex functions in [14]. The reader may refer to [15,16,17,18] for further pieces of information and unexplained aspects regarding these types of inequalities, including twice differentiable functions.
Mathematical preliminaries in fractional calculus theory, which will be used throughout this paper, are given as follows.
Definition 1
([19]). Let us consider f L 1 [ ρ , μ ] . The Riemann–Liouville integrals J ρ + α f and J μ α f of order α > 0 are defined by
J ρ + α f ( ξ ) = 1 Γ ( α ) ρ ξ ξ t α 1 f ( t ) d t , ξ > ρ
and
J μ α f ( ξ ) = 1 Γ ( α ) ξ μ t ξ α 1 f ( t ) d t , ξ < μ ,
respectively. Here, Γ ( α ) is the Gamma function and is described as follows:
Γ ( α ) = 0 e u u α 1 d u .
Let us also note that J ρ + 0 f ( ξ ) = J μ 0 f ( ξ ) = f ( ξ ) .
Remark 1.
If we choose α = 1 in Definition 1, then the fractional integral reduces to the classical integral.
In [20], the Simpson inequalities for differentiable functions are extended to Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. In addition to these, several papers are focused on fractional Simpson inequalities [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. For further similar results and properties of Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals, see [19,28,29,30,31].
In [32], the authors proved some new inequalities of Simpson’s type based on s convexity by fractional integrals. If we choose s = 1 as in ([32], Theorem 2.3), we obtain the following.
Theorem 2
([32]). Let f : I [ 0 , ) R be a function such that f is differentiable on I 0 . Let a , b I with a < b . Suppose that f L 1 [ a , b ] and f is convex on [ a , b ] . Then, the following inequality for Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals holds:
1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 b a α J a + α f a + b 2 + J b α f a + b 2 b a 2 φ α f a + f b .
Here,
φ α = 2 3 1 α + 1 α 1 + α + 1 2 1 + α 1 3 .
Theorem 3
([33]). Suppose that the assumptions of Theorem 2 hold. Then, the following inequalities hold:
1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 b a α J a + b 2 + α f b + J a + b 2 α f a b a 12 C 2 ( α ) f b + f a + 2 C 1 ( α ) f a + b 2 b a 12 C 1 ( α ) + C 2 ( α ) f a + f b ,
where
C 1 ( α ) = 2 1 3 2 α 1 2 1 α + 2 + 3 α + 2 1 2 , C 2 ( α ) = 2 1 3 1 α 1 1 α + 1 2 1 3 2 α 1 2 1 α + 2 + 3 α + 1 α + 2 1 2 .
Iqbal et al. [20] established new Simpson-type inequalities for Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals using the convexity for the class of functions whose derivatives in absolute value at certain powers are convex functions, as proposed in the following theorem.
Theorem 4
([20]). Suppose that the assumptions of Theorem 2 are valid. Then, the inequality
1 6 f a + 2 3 f a + b 2 + 1 6 f b Γ α + 1 2 b a α J a + α f ( b ) + J b α f ( a ) b a 2 α K 1 + K 2 f a + f b
is valid. Here, d α = 2 2 α 1 3 + 1 and
K 1 = 1 6 1 3 1 1 3 1 α 1 α + 1 1 3 1 + 1 α + 1 2 α + 1 , K 2 = 2 1 3 + 1 2 2 α 1 d 1 + 1 + 2 α + 1 2 d α + 1 2 2 α 1 α + 1 1 3 + 1 2 2 α 1 .
The purpose of this paper is to prove some Simpson-type inequalities for Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. The general structure of the paper consists of three sections, including the Introduction. The remaining parts of the paper are as follows. In Section 2, we will establish some upper and lower bounds for Simpson’s rule for Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operators by using functions whose second derivatives are bounded. Moreover, we also show a Simpson-type inequality for Riemann integrals by using a special case of our main results. Furthermore, we will give some examples to illustrate the main results. In the last section, some conclusions and further directions of research will be presented.

2. Main Results of Simpson-Type Inequalities for Bounded Functions

In this section, we establish the following inequalities, which give the upper and lower bounds for the Simpson-type inequalities for Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operators. Here, fractional Simpson-type inequalities are applied to the functions that have the conditions m f ( t ) M for all t a , b instead of convexity. Throughout this paper, we will refer to Theorems 2–4 as the Simpson-type inequalities of the first sense, second sense, and third sense, respectively.

2.1. Simpson-Type Inequalities of the First Sense

Theorem 5.
Let f : a , b R be a positive, twice differentiable function, and f L 1 a , b . If f is bounded, i.e., m f ( t ) M for all t a , b with m , M R and α > 0 , then the following inequalities hold:
( b a ) 2 12 ( α + 2 ) m α M 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 b a α J a + α f a + b 2 + J b α f a + b 2 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b ( b a ) 2 12 ( α + 2 ) M α m .
Proof. 
By using the change of variables, we have
2 α 1 Γ ( α + 1 ) b a α J a + α f a + b 2 + J b α f a + b 2 = 2 α 1 α b a α a a + b 2 a + b 2 x α 1 f ( x ) d x + a + b 2 b x a + b 2 α 1 f ( x ) d x = 2 α 1 α b a α a a + b 2 a + b 2 x α 1 f ( x ) d x + a a + b 2 a + b 2 x α 1 f ( a + b x ) d x = 2 α 1 α b a α a a + b 2 a + b 2 x α 1 f ( x ) + f ( a + b x ) d x .
By the equality (2), we obtain
2 α 1 Γ ( α + 1 ) b a α J a + α f a + b 2 + J b α f a + b 2 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = 2 α 1 α b a α a a + b 2 a + b 2 x α 1 f ( x ) + f ( a + b x ) d x 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = 2 α 1 α 3 b a α a a + b 2 a + b 2 x α 1 3 f ( x ) + 3 f ( a + b x ) f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b d x .
We can write easily that
f x f a = a x f ( t ) d t ,
f a + b x f b = a + b x b f ( t ) d t = a x f ( a + b t ) d t ,
f x f a + b 2 = x a + b 2 f ( t ) d t ,
and
f a + b x f a + b 2 = a + b 2 a + b x f ( t ) d t = x a + b 2 f ( a + b t ) d t .
By using the equalities (4) and (5), we have
f x + f a + b x f a f b = a x f ( t ) f ( a + b t ) d t .
From (6) and (7), we obtain
f x 2 f a + b 2 + f a + b x = x a + b 2 f ( a + b t ) f ( t ) d t .
We also have
f ( a + b t ) f t = t a + b t f ( u ) d u .
By using the equality (10) and m < f ( u ) < M , u a , b , we obtain
m t a + b t d u t a + b t f ( u ) d u M t a + b t d u
i.e.,
m a + b 2 t f ( a + b t ) f ( t ) M a + b 2 t .
Integrating the inequality (11) with respect to t on a , x , we obtain
M b x a x a x f ( t ) f ( a + b t ) d t m b x a x .
With the help of the equality (8), it follows that
M b x a x f ( x ) + f ( a + b x ) f a f b m b x a x .
Integrating the inequality (11) with respect to t on x , a + b 2 , we obtain
m a + b 2 x 2 x a + b 2 f ( t ) f ( a + b t ) d t M a + b 2 x 2 .
By using the equality (9), it follows that
2 m a + b 2 x 2 2 f x 2 f a + b 2 + f a + b x 2 M a + b 2 x 2 .
From (12) and (13), we obtain
M b x a x + 2 m a + b 2 x 2 3 f ( x ) + 3 f ( a + b x ) f a 4 f a + b 2 f b m b x a x + 2 M a + b 2 x 2 .
Multiplying the inequalities (14) by 2 α 1 α 3 b a α a + b 2 x 2 and integrating the resultant inequality with respect to x on a , a + b 2 , we have
2 α 1 α 3 b a α a a + b 2 a + b 2 x 2 M b x a x + 2 m a + b 2 x 2 d x 2 α 1 α 3 b a α a a + b 2 a + b 2 x 2 3 f ( x ) + 3 f ( a + b x ) f a 4 f a + b 2 f b d x 2 α 1 α 3 b a α a a + b 2 a + b 2 x 2 m b x a x + 2 M a + b 2 x 2 d x .
By using the equalities (3) and the equality
a a + b 2 a + b 2 x 2 M b x a x + 2 m a + b 2 x 2 d x = 2 α + 2 m M α b a 2 α + 2 ,
then we obtain
( b a ) 2 12 ( α + 2 ) m α M 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 b a α J a + α f a + b 2 + J b α f a + b 2 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b ( b a ) 2 12 ( α + 2 ) M α m .
This completes the proof of Theorem 5. □
Corollary 1.
Let us consider α = 1 in Theorem 5. Then, we obtain
( b a ) 2 36 m M 1 b a a b f t d t 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b ( b a ) 2 36 M m .
Equivalently, we have
1 b a a b f t d t 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b ( b a ) 2 36 M m .
Example 1.
If we define a function f : [ a , b ] = [ 0 , 1 ] R by f ( x ) = x 3 + x 2 , then we obtain m = 2 and M = 8 . Let us consider the left and right sides of the inequalities (1) as follows:
( b a ) 2 12 ( α + 2 ) m α M = α 4 6 ( α + 2 ) : = Ω 1
and
( b a ) 2 12 ( α + 2 ) M α m = 4 α 1 6 ( α + 2 ) : = Ω 2 .
The middle parts of the inequalities (1) are as follows:
1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = 1 6 f 0 + 4 f 1 2 + f 1 = 7 12 ,
J a + α f a + b 2 = J 0 + α f 1 2 = 1 Γ α 0 1 2 1 2 x x 3 + x 2 d x = 1 Γ α 1 2 α + 3 α + 3 + 5 2 α + 2 7 4 α + 1 + 3 2 α + 3 α = 3 α 3 + 3 α 2 + 4 α + 18 2 α + 3 Γ α α α + 1 α + 2 α + 3 ,
and
J b α f a + b 2 = J 1 α f 1 2 = 1 Γ α 1 2 1 1 2 x x 3 + x 2 d x = 16 α 3 + 76 α 2 + 92 α + 18 2 α + 3 Γ α α α + 1 α + 2 α + 3 .
With the help of the equalities (15)–(17), we have
2 α 1 Γ α + 1 b a α J a + α f a + b 2 + J b α f a + b 2 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = 19 α 3 + 79 α 2 + 96 α + 36 16 α + 1 α + 2 α + 3 7 12 : = Ω 3 .
As one can see in Figure 1, the result of our appropriate choices in Example 1 is provided in the double inequality (1).

2.2. Simpson’s Type Inequalities of the Second Sense

Theorem 6.
Under the assumptions of Theorem 5, we have the following double inequality:
( b a ) 2 24 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) 4 m α α + 3 M 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 b a α J a + b 2 + α f ( b ) + J a + b 2 α f ( a ) 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b ( b a ) 2 24 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) 4 M α α + 3 m .
Proof. 
By using the change of variables, we have
2 α 1 Γ ( α + 1 ) b a α J a + b 2 + α f ( b ) + J a + b 2 α f ( a ) = 2 α 1 α b a α a + b 2 b b x α 1 f ( x ) d x + a a + b 2 x a α 1 f ( x ) d x = 2 α 1 α b a α a a + b 2 x a α 1 f a + b x d x + a a + b 2 x a α 1 f x d x = 2 α 1 α b a α a a + b 2 f ( x ) + f ( a + b x ) x a α 1 d x .
By the equalities (19), we obtain
2 α 1 Γ ( α + 1 ) b a α J a + b 2 + α f ( b ) + J a + b 2 α f ( a ) 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = 2 α 1 α b a α a a + b 2 f ( x ) + f ( a + b x ) x a α 1 d x 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = 2 α 1 α 3 b a α a a + b 2 3 f ( x ) + 3 f ( a + b x ) f a 4 f a + b 2 f b x a α 1 d x .
Multiplying the inequality (14) by 2 α 1 α x a α 1 3 b a α and integrating the resultant inequality with respect to x on a , a + b 2 , we obtain
2 α 1 α 3 b a α a a + b 2 2 a + b 2 x 2 m M ( b x ) ( x a ) x a α 1 d x 2 α 1 α b a α a a + b 2 3 f ( x ) f a f b 4 f a + b 2 + 3 f ( a + b x ) x a α 1 d x 2 α 1 α 3 b a α a a + b 2 2 a + b 2 x 2 M m ( b x ) ( x a ) x a α 1 d x .
If we consider the equalities
a a + b 2 a + b 2 x 2 x a α 1 d x = b a α + 2 2 α + 1 α ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 )
and
a a + b 2 b x x a α d x = 2 b a α + 2 α + 3 2 α + 2 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) ,
then we obtain
( b a ) 2 24 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) 4 m α α + 3 M 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 b a α J a + b 2 + α f ( b ) + J a + b 2 α f ( a ) 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b ( b a ) 2 24 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) 4 M α α + 3 m .
This concludes the proof of the inequalities (18). □
Remark 2.
If we choose α = 1 in Theorem 6, then Theorem 6 reduces to Corollary 1.
Example 2.
If we describe a function f : [ a , b ] = [ 0 , 1 ] R by f ( x ) = x 3 6 , then we have m = 0 and M = 1 . The left and right sides of the inequalities (18) are as follows:
( b a ) 2 24 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) 4 m α α + 3 M = α α + 3 24 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) : = Ψ 1
and
( b a ) 2 24 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) 4 M α α + 3 m = 1 6 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) : = Ψ 2 .
The middle parts of inequalities (18) are as follows:
1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = 1 6 0 + 1 12 + 1 6 = 1 24 ,
J a + b 2 + α f ( b ) = J 1 2 + α f ( 1 ) = 1 6 Γ α 1 2 1 1 x α 1 x 3 d x = 1 6 Γ α 1 2 α + 3 α + 3 + 3 2 α + 2 α + 2 3 2 α + 1 α + 1 + 1 2 α α = α 3 + 9 α 2 + 32 α + 48 3 · 2 α Γ α α α + 1 α + 2 α + 3 ,
and
J a + b 2 α f ( a ) = J 1 2 α f ( 0 ) = 1 6 Γ α 0 1 2 x α + 2 d x = 1 3 · 2 α + 4 Γ α α + 3 .
By using equalities (20)–(22), it follows that
2 α 1 Γ α + 1 b a α J a + b 2 + α f ( b ) + J a + b 2 α f ( a ) 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = α 3 6 α 2 5 α + 12 48 α + 1 α + 2 α + 3 : = Ψ 3 .
As one can see in Figure 2, the result of Example 2 is satisfied in the inequality (18).

2.3. Simpson’s Type Inequalities of the Third Sense

Theorem 7.
Under the assumptions of Theorem 5, we have the inequalities
( b a ) 2 α 6 α + 1 α + 2 m α 2 α + 2 2 α M Γ α + 1 2 b a α J a + α f b + J b α f a 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b ( b a ) 2 α 6 α + 1 α + 2 M α 2 α + 2 2 α m .
Proof. 
With the help of the change of variables, we have
Γ α + 1 2 b a α J a + α f b + J b α f a = α 2 b a α a b b x α 1 f ( x ) d x + a b x a α 1 f ( x ) d x = α 2 b a α a b b x α 1 + x a α 1 f ( x ) d x = α 2 b a α a b x a α 1 + b x α 1 f ( a + b x ) d x = α b a α a b x a α 1 + b x α 1 f x + f ( a + b x ) d x = α 2 b a α a a + b 2 x a α 1 + b x α 1 f x + f ( a + b x ) d x .
By the equality (24), we obtain
Γ ( α + 1 ) 2 b a α J a + α f b + J b α f a 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = α 2 b a α a a + b 2 x a α 1 + b x α 1 f ( x ) + f ( a + b x ) d x 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = α 6 b a α a a + b 2 x a α 1 + b x α 1 3 f ( x ) + 3 f ( a + b x ) f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b d x .
Multiplying the inequalities (14) by α 6 b a α x a α 1 + b x α 1 and integrating the resultant inequality with respect to x on a , a + b 2 , it follows that
α 6 b a α a a + b 2 x a α 1 + b x α 1 M b x a x + 2 m a + b 2 x 2 d x α 6 b a α a a + b 2 x a α 1 + b x α 1 3 f ( x ) + 3 f ( a + b x ) f a 4 f a + b 2 f b d x α 6 b a α a a + b 2 x a α 1 + b x α 1 m b x a x + 2 M a + b 2 x 2 d x .
From (25) and the equality
a a + b 2 x a α 1 + b x α 1 M b x a x + 2 m a + b 2 x 2 d x = b a α + 2 α + 1 α + 2 α 2 α + 2 2 α m M ,
we obtain
b a 2 α 6 α + 1 α + 2 α 2 α + 2 2 α m M Γ α + 1 2 b a α J a + α f b + J b α f a 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b b a 2 α 6 α + 1 α + 2 α 2 α + 2 2 α M m .
This completes the proof of Theorem 7. □
Remark 3.
Let us consider α = 1 in Theorem 7. Then, Theorem 7 becomes Corollary 1.
Example 3.
If we choose a function f : [ a , b ] = [ 0 , 2 ] R by f ( x ) = x 3 + 1 , then we obtain m = 0 and M = 12 . Let us consider the left and right sides of the double inequality (23). Then, the following equalities hold:
( b a ) 2 α 6 α + 1 α + 2 m α 2 α + 2 2 α M = 8 α ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) : = Φ 1
and
( b a ) 2 α 6 α + 1 α + 2 M α 2 α + 2 2 α m = 4 α 2 α + 2 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) : = Φ 2 .
The middle parts of inequalities (23) are as follows:
1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = 1 6 f 0 + 4 f 1 + f 2 = 3 ,
J a + α f b = J 0 + α f 2 = 1 Γ α 0 2 2 x α 1 x 3 + 1 d x = 2 α + 3 Γ α 3 α + 2 1 α + 3 + 9 8 α 2 α + 1 = 2 α α 3 + 6 α 2 + 11 α + 54 Γ α α α + 1 α + 2 α + 3 .
Similarly, we can also obtain
J b α f a = J 2 α f 0 = 1 Γ α 0 2 x α 1 x 3 + 1 d x = 2 α 9 α + 3 α + 1 α + 2 α + 3 .
By utilizing equalities (26)–(28), the following equality arises:
Γ α + 1 2 b a α J a + α f b + J b α f a 1 6 f a + 4 f a + b 2 + f b = 2 α 3 14 α + 12 α + 1 α + 2 α + 3 : = Φ 3 .
As one can see in Figure 3, the result of our appropriate choices in Example 3 is provided in the double inequality (23).

3. Conclusions

In the present paper, we prove some Simpson-type inequalities for Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operators by utilizing the functions whose second derivatives are bounded. Some examples that give a graphical illustration of our main results are presented. With reference to our paper, other authors can try to find better bounds using functions with conditions m f ( t ) M for all t a , b instead of convexity in future studies. Moreover, by applying these results, researchers can obtain some new approaches in the theory of optimization.

Author Contributions

H.B.: problem statement, investigation, methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing. F.H.: computation, conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft. H.K.: computation, investigation, writing—original draft. M.Z.S.: problem statement, investigation, methodology, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this paper as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest declared by the authors.

References

  1. Alomari, M.; Darus, M.; Dragomir, S.S. New inequalities of Simpson’s type for s-convex functions with applications. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2009, 12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Özdemir, M.E. On new inequalities of Simpson’s type for convex functions. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2010, 13, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Özdemir, M.E. On new inequalities of Simpson’s type for s-convex functions. Comput. Math. Appl. 2020, 60, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Du, T.; Li, Y.; Yang, Z. A generalization of Simpson’s inequality via differentiable mapping using extended (s,m)-convex functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2017, 293, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. İşcan, İ. Hermite-Hadamard and Simpson-like type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions. J. Math. 2014, 2014, 346305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Y.; Du, T. Some Simpson type integral inequalities for functions whose third derivatives are (α,m)-GA-convex functions. J. Egypt. Math. 2016, 24, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, W. Some Simpson type inequalities for h-convex and (α,m)-convex functions. J. Comput. Anal. App. 2014, 16, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ozdemir, M.E.; Akdemir, A.O.; Kavurmacı, H. On the Simpson’s inequality for convex functions on the coordinates. Turk. Anal. Number Theory 2014, 2, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Park, J. On Simpson-like type integral inequalities for differentiable preinvex functions. Appl. Math. Sci. 2013, 7, 6009–6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matloka, M. Some inequalities of Simpson type for h-convex functions via fractional integrals. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2015, 2015, 956850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Özdemir, M.E. On new inequalities of Simpson’s type for functions whose second derivatives absolute values are convex. J. Appl. Math. Stat. Inform. 2013, 9, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Aktan, N. On the generalization of some integral inequalities and their applications. Math. Computer Model. 2011, 54, 2175–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, J. On Some Integral Inequalities for Twice Differentiable Quasi–Convex and Convex Functions via Fractional Integrals. Appl. Math. Sci. 2015, 9, 3057–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ozdemir, M.E.; Yildiz, C. New inequalities for Hermite-Hadamard and Simpson type with applications. Tamkang J. Math. 2013, 44, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hezenci, F.; Budak, H.; Kara, H. New version of Fractional Simpson type inequalities for twice differentiable functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 2021, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hussain, S.; Qisar, S. More results on Simpson’s type inequality through convexity for twice differentiable continuous mappings. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vivas-Cortez, M.; Abdeljawad, T.; Mohammed, P.O.; Rangel-Oliveros, Y. Simpson’s integral inequalities for twice differentiable convex functions. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 2020, 1936461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. You, X.; Hezenci, F.; Budak, H.; Kara, H. New Simpson type inequalities for twice differentiable functions via generalized fractional integrals. AIMS Math. 2021, 7, 3959–3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations; Mathematics Studies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
  20. Iqbal, M.; Qaisar, S.; Hussain, S. On Simpson’s type inequalities utilizing fractional integrals. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2017, 23, 1137–1145. [Google Scholar]
  21. Abdeljawad, T.; Rashid, S.; Hammouch, Z.; İşcan, İ.; Chu, Y.M. Some new Simpson-type inequalities for generalized p-convex function on fractal sets with applications. Adv. Differ. 2020, 2020, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dragomir, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P.; Cerone, P. On Simpson’s inequality and applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2000, 5, 533–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hussain, S.; Khalid, J.; Chu, Y.M. Some generalized fractional integral Simpson’s type inequalities with applications. AIMS Math 2020, 5, 5859–5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kermausuor, S. Simpson’s type inequalities via the Katugampola fractional integrals for s-convex functions. Kragujev. J. Math. 2021, 45, 709–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, B.Z. An inequality of Simpson type. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2005, 461, 2155–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lei, H.; Hu, G.; Nie, J.; Du, T. Generalized Simpson-type inequalities considering first derivatives through the k-Fractional Integrals. Iaeng Int. J. Appl. Math. 2020, 50, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rashid, S.; Akdemir, A.O.; Jarad, F.; Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I. Simpson’s type integral inequalities for κ-fractional integrals and their applications. AIMS Math. 2019, 4, 1087–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Budak, H.; Hezenci, F.; Kara, H. On parameterized inequalities of Ostrowski and Simpson type for convex functions via generalized fractional integrals. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 12522–12536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gorenflo, R.; Mainardi, F. Fractional Calculus: Integral and Differential Equations of Fractional Order; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 1997; pp. 223–276. [Google Scholar]
  30. Luo, C.; Du, T. Generalized Simpson type inequalities involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and their applications. Filomat 2020, 34, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Miller, S.; Ross, B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen, J.; Huang, X. Some new inequalities of Simpson’s type for s-convex functions via fractional integrals. Filomat 2017, 31, 4989–4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hai, X.; Wang, S.H. Simpson type inequalities for convex function based on the generalized fractional integrals. Turk. Inequal. 2021, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Graph for the result of Example 1 computed and plotted in MATLAB program.
Figure 1. Graph for the result of Example 1 computed and plotted in MATLAB program.
Mathematics 11 02282 g001
Figure 2. A graph computed and drawn in MATLAB program for the result of Example 2.
Figure 2. A graph computed and drawn in MATLAB program for the result of Example 2.
Mathematics 11 02282 g002
Figure 3. Graph for the result of Example 3, calculated and plotted in MATLAB program.
Figure 3. Graph for the result of Example 3, calculated and plotted in MATLAB program.
Mathematics 11 02282 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Budak, H.; Hezenci, F.; Kara, H.; Sarikaya, M.Z. Bounds for the Error in Approximating a Fractional Integral by Simpson’s Rule. Mathematics 2023, 11, 2282. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11102282

AMA Style

Budak H, Hezenci F, Kara H, Sarikaya MZ. Bounds for the Error in Approximating a Fractional Integral by Simpson’s Rule. Mathematics. 2023; 11(10):2282. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11102282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Budak, Hüseyin, Fatih Hezenci, Hasan Kara, and Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya. 2023. "Bounds for the Error in Approximating a Fractional Integral by Simpson’s Rule" Mathematics 11, no. 10: 2282. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11102282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop