Next Article in Journal
What Kind of Economic Citizen? A Response
Next Article in Special Issue
How to Measure Procedural Knowledge for Solving Biodiversity and Climate Change Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Religion and Negotiation of the Boundary between Majority and Minority in Québec: Discourses of Young Muslims in Montréal CÉGEPs
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Biological Visualizations Do Science Center Visitors Prefer in an Interactive Touch Table?
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Educ. Sci. 2018, 8(4), 184;

Assessment of Competencies in Scientific Inquiry Through the Application of Rasch Measurement Techniques

Centre for Science and Technology Education, School of Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, 5210 Muttenz, Switzerland
Educational Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
Biology Education, IPN-Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education at Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
Biology Education, Kassel University, 34125 Kassel, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 June 2018 / Revised: 17 October 2018 / Accepted: 18 October 2018 / Published: 24 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biology Education)
Full-Text   |   PDF [985 KB, uploaded 27 December 2018]   |  


Achieving competence in scientific inquiry or mastering scientific practices is an essential element of scientific literacy. Clearly, if students’ Scientific Inquiry Competence (SIC) is to be improved, a critical step is to reliably measure it and provide from this measurement feedback for teaching. Although numerous instruments were presented in literature to assess SIC, the specific potential of Rasch measurement for the integration of research assessment and individual feedback onto SIC is so far underestimated. This article presents details regarding the design and evaluation of a test instrument using an open-response format to measure students’ SIC in content-rich biology contexts at the upper secondary level. First, a set of three sub-competences (“generating hypotheses”, “designing experiments” and “analyzing data”) each composed of five competence aspects is introduced from literature to define the SIC construct. The SIC instrument was then operationalized using six open-ended partial-credit items. After pilot testing, the instrument was administered to N = 220 students (ages 15–19) before and after an inquiry-based unit on enzymes. Instrument functioning was evaluated using the Rasch Partial-Credit Model and first results towards satisfactory instrument functioning (e.g., validity and reliability) are presented. Particularly noteworthy is that the observed pattern in competence difficulty matched the pattern predicted from theoretical considerations. We demonstrate how the SIC instrument can be used for competence assessment and the evaluation of the effectiveness of learning. View Full-Text
Keywords: scientific inquiry; competence; problem-solving; biology; Rasch measurement; instrument development scientific inquiry; competence; problem-solving; biology; Rasch measurement; instrument development

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Arnold, J.C.; Boone, W.J.; Kremer, K.; Mayer, J. Assessment of Competencies in Scientific Inquiry Through the Application of Rasch Measurement Techniques. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 184.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Educ. Sci. EISSN 2227-7102 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top