Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Catch-Up Behavior: Accession of Lecture Capture Videos Following Student Absenteeism
Previous Article in Journal
Learning in Social Networks: Rationale and Ideas for Its Implementation in Higher Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
“Assessment as Discourse”: A Pre-Service Physics Teacher’s Evolving Capacity to Support an Equitable Pedagogy
Open AccessArticle

“Which Child Left Behind”: Historical Issues Regarding Equity in Science Assessment

Monash University and Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove campus, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia
Griffith Institute for Educational Research, Mount Gravatt campus, Griffith University, 176 Messines Ridge Rd, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2013, 3(3), 326-343;
Received: 22 April 2013 / Revised: 24 July 2013 / Accepted: 24 July 2013 / Published: 7 August 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Assessment in Supporting an Equitable Pedagogy)
Assessment of learning plays a dominant role in formal education in the forms of determining features of curriculum that are emphasized, pedagogic methods that teachers use with their students, and parents’ and employers’ understanding of how well students have performed. A common perception is that fair assessment applies the same mode of assessment and content focus for all students—the approach of assessments in international comparative studies of science achievement. This article examines research evidence demonstrating that the act of assessment is not neutral—different forms of assessment advantage or disadvantage groups of students on the basis of family backgrounds, gender, race, or disability. Assessment that implicitly or explicitly captures the social capital of the child serves to consolidate, not address, educational equity. The article provides an overview of ways that science curriculum focus and assessment can introduce bias in the identification of student achievement. It examines the effect of changes to curriculum and assessment approaches in science, and relationships between assessment of science and the cultural context of the student. Recommendations are provided for science–assessment research to address bias for different groups of students. View Full-Text
Keywords: science assessment; equity; social capital; gender; culture; language; disability science assessment; equity; social capital; gender; culture; language; disability
MDPI and ACS Style

Fensham, P.J.; Cumming, J.J. “Which Child Left Behind”: Historical Issues Regarding Equity in Science Assessment. Educ. Sci. 2013, 3, 326-343.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop