This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessSystematic Review
Microlearning in Software Engineering Education: A Systematic Review of Initiatives and Curriculum Modernization
by
Franklin Parrales-Bravo
Franklin Parrales-Bravo 1,2,3
1
Artificial Intelligence Research Group, Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador, Km 5 ½ vía Durán—Yaguachi, Durán 092405, Ecuador
2
Grupo de Investigación en Inteligencia Artificial, Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas y Físicas, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil 090514, Ecuador
3
Faculty of Computer Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Av. Séneca, 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Submission received: 19 February 2026
/
Revised: 9 March 2026
/
Accepted: 18 March 2026
/
Published: 20 March 2026
Abstract
This systematic review maps the landscape of microlearning research within software engineering education, critically examining how this pedagogical approach is being applied to develop the multifaceted competencies required of modern software professionals. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review synthesized 21 empirical studies from 2015 to 2026, analyzing their pedagogical approaches, technological integrations, curriculum coverage, and evidence of effectiveness. The findings reveal a field marked by creative experimentation yet significant fragmentation: while microlearning effectively engages students and conveys discrete programming and project management knowledge through gamified, mobile, and project-based formats, its application remains narrowly concentrated on introductory coding, leaving advanced competencies such as software architecture, requirements engineering, and testing strategies virtually unexplored. The review further exposes critical gaps in the evidence base, including the absence of longitudinal and transfer studies, the conflation of platform engagement with learning, and methodologically fragile claims of effectiveness. Enthusiasm for microcredentials and AI-personalized learning considerably outstrips empirical support, with implemented systems relying on rule-based logic rather than adaptive intelligence and credentialing frameworks lacking validation of employer recognition or employment outcomes. This review concludes that while microlearning holds genuine potential for just-in-time skill development in a rapidly evolving discipline, its role in software engineering education must be strategic and supplemental rather than comprehensive. The field must urgently move from promotional advocacy toward rigorous, comparative, and longitudinal research that assesses higher-order competencies and authentic professional capability, lest its promise remain unfulfilled.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Parrales-Bravo, F.
Microlearning in Software Engineering Education: A Systematic Review of Initiatives and Curriculum Modernization. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 487.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030487
AMA Style
Parrales-Bravo F.
Microlearning in Software Engineering Education: A Systematic Review of Initiatives and Curriculum Modernization. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(3):487.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030487
Chicago/Turabian Style
Parrales-Bravo, Franklin.
2026. "Microlearning in Software Engineering Education: A Systematic Review of Initiatives and Curriculum Modernization" Education Sciences 16, no. 3: 487.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030487
APA Style
Parrales-Bravo, F.
(2026). Microlearning in Software Engineering Education: A Systematic Review of Initiatives and Curriculum Modernization. Education Sciences, 16(3), 487.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030487
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.