Next Article in Journal
Open and Hidden Voices of Teachers: Lived Experiences of Making Updates to Preschool Curriculum Provoked by the National Guidelines
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Professional Development Programs on English as a Foreign Language Instructors in Higher Education Institutions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quality of Reflections on Teaching: Approaches to Its Measurement and Low-Threshold Promotion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Education Sciences
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/educsci15081070
Review Report
education-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Emotional Experience and Depth of Reflection: Teacher Education Students’ Analyses of Functional and Dysfunctional Video Scenarios

Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(8), 1070; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081070
by Anne Schlosser * and Jennifer Paetsch
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(8), 1070; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081070
Submission received: 11 July 2025 / Revised: 15 August 2025 / Accepted: 18 August 2025 / Published: 20 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Reflection in Teaching and Learning)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The study is well conceived and a detailed report is attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article is very interesting and sound. There is substance in the theoretical framework, the purpose of this study is clearly outlined and the abstract highlights what the study found. The results are presented in a consistent order and the limitations are well described.

 

However, there are a few points in the article which needs refinement and/or additional information, such as:

  1. Introduction:
    1. The introduction is well supported; however it needs more information regarding the subject that this research focuses on. This is of great importance because the readers must understand what subject this is referring to. In the way that it is now, it is very vague, and I believe that, for example, videos of a science class may be different than videos of a physical education class.
  2. Methods:
    1. Can you please provide more information regarding the reflection task and the questionnaire provided to the participants?
    2. Page 7, line 323: I believe that calling the participants “participants” is more humanising than calling them “sample”
    3. Can you please provide more information regarding the videos and what behaviours were being analysed?
  3. Discussion:
    1. The discussion is very sound. I believe, however, that more emphasis should be given to the specific subject, as I feel that while reading the manuscript this is somewhat missing.
  4. Inconsistencies:
    1. References. The references are not always written in the same reference. For example: sometimes, citations in parethesis of two authors appear as “Lenkse & Lohse-Bossenz, 2023” and other times appear as “Lenkse and Lohse-Bossenz, 2023”.
    2. Revise the manuscript for passive voice. It is better writing to use active voice, rather than passive voice.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop