Professional Teaching Competence Perceived by Portuguese Students of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences in Gymnastic Disciplines
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample
2.2. Instrument
2.3. Procedure
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Practical Implications
4.2. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Álvarez, R., & Díaz, M. (2011). La percepción de los estudiantes universitarios en la medida de la competencia docente: Validación de una escala. Revista Educación, 28(2), 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ávalos, M. A., & Martínez, M. A. (2022). Self-regulation of gymnastic skills learning in initial training: Student-centered strategies. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 14(2), 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ávalos, M. A., Martínez, M. A., & Merma, G. (2015). La pertinencia educativa de las habilidades gimnásticas: Apreciaciones del profesorado. Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes, 121(3), 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ávalos-Ramos, M. A., & Vega-Ramírez, L. (2020). Gender differences in the level of achievement of gymnastic and acrobatic skills. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boned, C. J., Rodríguez, G., Mayorga, J. I., & Merino, Á. (2006). Competencias profesionales del licenciado en ciencias de la actividad física y el deporte. European Journal of Human Movement, 15, 1–6. Available online: https://recyt.fecyt.es/ (accessed on 10 July 2025).
- Capangpangan, S., Pongase, M., Merquita, R., Bungabong, G., Barrete, D., & Bulilawa, R. (2024). Gymnastic skills: Challenges and compensatory measures. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 10(7), 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carreiro da Costa, F., Jacinto, J., Cruz, S., Pedreira, M., Rocha, L., Mira, J., & Carvalho, L. (2001). Esino Básico. 3° ciclo Ministério da Educação (2001). Programa Educação Física—3.o ciclo [program of physical education for the 3rd cycle of basic education (7th, 8th and 9th grades) of basic education.)]. Lisboa. [Google Scholar]
- Carride, C., De Souza Moura, C., Schiavon, L., & Bortoleto, M. (2017). O ensino da ginástica de Itatiba/SP: De volta às escolas. Motrivivência, 29, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cenizo, J. M., Seiva, P., & Fernández-Truan, J. C. (2017). Autoeficacia del profesorado de educación física en la enseñanza de habilidades gimnásticas. EmásF: Revista Digital de Educación Física, 8(44), 41–55. [Google Scholar]
- Cheon, S., Reeve, J., Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Why autonomy-supportive interventions work: Explaining the professional development of teachers’ motivating style. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, K., Tsuda, E., Ward, P., & Chey, W. (2023). Developing adaptive planning skills by preservice physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 43(2), 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colquitt, G., Pritchard, T., Johnson, C., & Mc Collum, S. (2017). Differentiating instruction in Physical Education: Personalization of learning. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 88, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L. (2023). Research on the innovative teaching mode of rhythmic gymnastics course under the condition of multimedia and network technology. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology, 7, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deed, C., Blake, D., Henriksen, J., Mooney, A., Prain, V., Tytler, R., Zitzlaff, T., Edwards, M., Emery, S., Muir, T., Swabey, K., Thomas, D., Farrelly, C., Lovejoy, V., Meyers, N., & Fingland, D. (2020). Teacher adaptation to flexible learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 23, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dervent, F., Kurucan, A., Devrilmez, E., & Ward, P. (2022). Relationships between university instructors’ and preservice teachers’ content knowledge. European Physical Education Review, 28, 686–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz del Cueto, M. (2009). Percepción de competencia del profesorado de Educación Física e inclusión. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, 9(35), 322–348. [Google Scholar]
- Graça, A., & Batista, P. (2013). La Educación Física en las escuelas portuguesas. Tándem. Didáctica de la Educación Física, 42, 37–47. [Google Scholar]
- Hussein, A., Al-Shawabka, L., Aloran, H., Hammouri, W., Sharksi, R., Alaskar, W., & Al-Hawari, M. (2024). Analysis of teaching skills in swimming and gymnastics in faculties of Physical Education. SPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias del Deporte, 13(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iwaki, S., Sato, T., Tsuda, E., & Wyant, J. (2020). Japanese elementary classroom teachers’ experiences of teaching gymnastics in Physical Education. The Physical Educator, 77(2), 404–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khataybeh, A., Al-Shadiedh, M., & Khasawneh, G. (2024). The effectiveness of cooperative learning strategy for mastery in enhancing the skill performance of some gymnastics floor movements. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 28(4), 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirişci, I., & Celcima, D. (2024). Transforming theoretical knowledge into practical coaching expertise in university-level Artistic Gymnastics. KOSALB International Journal of Human Movements Science, 3(2), 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kornosenko, O., Danysko, O., & Horbenko, K. (2024). Botmer gymnastics in the system of training of future teachers of physical culture: Teaching technologies. Pedagogical Sciences, 1, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovač, M., Sember, V., & Pajek, M. (2020). Implementation of the gymnastics curriculum in the first three-year cycle of the primary school in Slovenia. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 12(3), 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuzmina, S., & Anisimova, N. (2023). The state of implementation of the “Gymnastics” section of the physical education program for the of students of 1–11th grades. Physical Education and University Sport, 2(1), 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei de Bases do Sistema Educativo n.° 46/86. (n.d.). Lei de Bases do Sistema Educativo n.° 46/86, de 14 de outubro (Portugal) Com as alterações introduzidas por: Lei n.° 115/97; Lei n.° 49/2005; Lei n.° 85/2009; Lei n.° 16/2023. Available online: https://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?nid=1744&tabela=leis (accessed on 10 July 2025).
- Leukel, C., Leuders, T., Bessi, F., & Loibl, K. (2023). Unveiling cognitive aspects and accuracy of diagnostic judgments in physical education teachers assessing different tasks in gymnastics. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1162499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, C., Mota, J., Santos, J., Daly-Smith, A., Chalkley, A., Singh, A., Ottesen, C., Tammelin, T., Archbold, V., & Silva, M. (2024). Portuguese school teachers’ perceptions of physically active learning. Translational Journal of the ACSM, 9(2), e000245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNamara, S., Lieberman, L., Wilson, K., & Colombo-Dougovito, A. (2021). ‘I mean I hate to say it’s sink or swim, but …’: College course instructors’ perceptions of the adapted physical education content that they prioritize and teach. Sport, Education and Society, 27, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McVeigh, J., & Waring, M. (2021). Developing the pedagogical practice of physical education pre-service teachers in gymnastics: Exploring gendered embodiment. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 28, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milosis, D. C., & Siatras, T. A. (2022). Gender differences in university students’ gymnastics specific self-efficacy and performance. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 14(3), 401–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina-García, N., González-Serrano, M. H., Ordiñana-Bellver, D., & Baena-Morales, S. (2024). Redefining education in Sports Sciences: A theoretical study for integrating competency-based learning for sustainable employment in Spain. Social Sciences, 13, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales, S., Viñoles-Cosentino, V., Esteve-Mon, F., & Sánchez-Tarazaga, L. (2024). La formación digital en los programas de iniciación a la docencia universitaria en españa: Un análisis comparativo a partir del digcomp y digcompedu. Educación XX1, 27(2), 37–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mounira, B., Naceur, A., & Mohamed, E. (2022). Impact of the gender of the Tunisian teacher on the representations of the dynamics of physical education sessions and its concretization. Creative Education, 13(1), 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, P., Santos, F., & Marinho, D. (2020). Examining Portuguese high school students’ attitudes toward Physical Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 604556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pérez-Pueyo, A. (2013). La evaluación formativa y compartida en el marco del estilo actitudinal. Revista Des-encuentros, 10(1), 6–7. [Google Scholar]
- Reguera-López-De-La-Osa, X., Gómez-Landero, L., Leal-Del-Ojo, P., & Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Á. (2023). Effectiveness of an Acrobatic Gymnastics programme for the improvement of social skills and self-esteem in adolescents. Sustainability, 15(7), 5910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reuker, S. (2017). The noticing of physical education teachers: A comparison of groups with different expertise. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22, 150–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, D., Randall, L., & Andrews, E. (2020). Physical education teachers’ (lack of) gymnastics instruction: An exploration of a neglected curriculum requirement. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 11, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roure, C., Méard, J., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., Flamme, X., Devillers, Y., & Dupont, J. (2019). The effects of video feedback on students’ situational interest in gymnastics. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y., Nirantranon, W., & Tasnaina, N. (2024). Development of flipped classroom teaching program on children’s basic gymnastics in higher vocation college. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 4(1), 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soytürk, M., & Öztürk, Ö. (2019). An investigation of the attitudes and competence perceptions of first- and fourth-year pre-service physical education teachers regarding teaching. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(4), 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tant, M., & Watelain, É. (2016). Forty years later, a systematic literature review on inclusion in Physical Education (1975–2015): A teacher perspective. Educational Research Review, 19, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S. (2020, 25–27 September). Research on teaching design of university gymnastics course unit based on Outcome-based Education. International Conference on Modern Education and Information Management (ICMEIM) (pp. 832–837), Dalian, China. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wnas, R., & Ghazi, H. (2022). The effect of (SNIPS) strategy on teaching methods on the performance of some technical gymnastics skills for female students. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S7), 3951–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yürük, S., & Asma, M. (2023). Peer teaching model in gymnastic education. Journal of Sport Sciences Research, 8(3), 586–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dimensions | Me | M | SD |
---|---|---|---|
D1 | 3.50 | 3.42 | 0.862 |
D2 | 3.39 | 3.50 | 0.748 |
D3 | 3.50 | 3.37 | 0.754 |
D4 | 3.33 | 3.39 | 0.712 |
D5 | 3.50 | 3.27 | 0.819 |
D6 | 3.33 | 3.39 | 0.780 |
D7 | 3.50 | 3.38 | 0.764 |
Dimensions | Women | Men | p | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Me | M | SD | Me | M | SD | ||
D1 | 4.00 | 3.69 | 0.843 | 3.50 | 3.30 | 0.849 | 0.033 * |
D2 | 3.50 | 3.55 | 0.791 | 3.50 | 3.32 | 0.725 | 0.160 |
D3 | 3.25 | 3.54 | 0.783 | 3.50 | 3.31 | 0.737 | 0.146 |
D4 | 3.33 | 3.49 | 0.764 | 3.33 | 3.35 | 0.690 | 0.346 |
D5 | 3.50 | 3.45 | 0.907 | 3.50 | 3.20 | 0.775 | 0.146 |
D6 | 3.67 | 3.61 | 0.761 | 3.33 | 3.30 | 0.775 | 0.058 |
D7 | 3.67 | 3.56 | 0.735 | 3.50 | 3.30 | 0.767 | 0.108 |
Dimensions | First | Second | Third | ||||||
Me | M | SD | Me | M | SD | Me | M | SD | |
D1 | 4.00 | 3.90 | 0.639 | 3.00 | 3.08 | 0.809 | 3.00 | 3.33 | 0.928 |
D2 | 3.88 | 3.75 | 0.564 | 3.00 | 3.17 | 0.789 | 3.38 | 3.28 | 0.737 |
D3 | 3.75 | 3.71 | 0.563 | 3.00 | 3.19 | 0.803 | 3.00 | 3.23 | 0.765 |
D4 | 3.67 | 3.68 | 0.539 | 3.33 | 3.22 | 0.726 | 3.00 | 3.30 | 0.789 |
D5 | 3.50 | 3.69 | 0.631 | 3.00 | 3.08 | 0.816 | 3.00 | 3.05 | 0.859 |
D6 | 4.00 | 3.79 | 0.583 | 3.00 | 3.14 | 0.804 | 3.33 | 3.28 | 0.782 |
D7 | 3.83 | 3.80 | 0.535 | 3.17 | 3.14 | 0.790 | 3.00 | 3.22 | 0.773 |
Post ad | (I) Level | (J) Level | Mean Differences (I–J) | SD | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | Scheffe | 1 | 2 | 0.819 * | 0.181 | 0.000 * |
3 | 0.572 * | 0.199 | 0.019 * | |||
D2 | Scheffe | 1 | 2 | 0.588 * | 0.161 | 0.002 * |
3 | 0.473 * | 0.178 | 0.032 * | |||
D3 | Scheffe | 1 | 2 | 0.522 * | 0.164 | 0.008 * |
3 | 0.482 * | 0.181 | 0.033 * | |||
D4 | Scheffe | 1 | 2 | 0.451 * | 0.157 | 0.019 * |
3 | 0.377 | 0.173 | 0.098 | |||
D5 | Scheffe | 1 | 2 | 0.604 * | 0.176 | 0.004 * |
3 | 0.634 * | 0.194 | 0.006 * | |||
D6 | Scheffe | 1 | 2 | 0.651 * | 0.167 | 0.001 * |
3 | 0.515 * | 0.184 | 0.023 * | |||
D7 | Scheffe | 1 | 2 | 0.652 * | 0.162 | 0.001 * |
3 | 0.571 * | 0.179 | 0.008 * |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ávalos-Ramos, M.A.; de Oliveira, J.A.M.; Molina-García, N.; Vega-Ramírez, L. Professional Teaching Competence Perceived by Portuguese Students of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences in Gymnastic Disciplines. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081056
Ávalos-Ramos MA, de Oliveira JAM, Molina-García N, Vega-Ramírez L. Professional Teaching Competence Perceived by Portuguese Students of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences in Gymnastic Disciplines. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(8):1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081056
Chicago/Turabian StyleÁvalos-Ramos, M.ª Alejandra, Joel André Moura de Oliveira, Nuria Molina-García, and Lilyan Vega-Ramírez. 2025. "Professional Teaching Competence Perceived by Portuguese Students of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences in Gymnastic Disciplines" Education Sciences 15, no. 8: 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081056
APA StyleÁvalos-Ramos, M. A., de Oliveira, J. A. M., Molina-García, N., & Vega-Ramírez, L. (2025). Professional Teaching Competence Perceived by Portuguese Students of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences in Gymnastic Disciplines. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081056