Solutions for Independent Goal Setting and Implementation of Primary School Students Fostering the Competence of Learning to Learn
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Research Objectives
2. Background
2.1. Expression of the Competence of Learning to Learn in the Context of Lithuanian General Education Programs
2.2. Assumptions for the Development of the Learning-to-Learn Competence in Primary School Students
2.3. The Relationship between the Learning-to-Learn Competence and Learning Strategies
- Surface learning strategies are related to acquiring knowledge, memorization, and meeting task requirements. These strategies are applied for the purpose of primary knowledge acquisition and information selection.
- Deep learning strategies are more associated with deeper learning, involving understanding, analysis, critical thinking, holistic information processing, and connecting with previous knowledge. In order to acquire deep learning strategies, students may transition from surface strategies and often use these strategies interchangeably to achieve learning goals [24].
- Transfer strategies reflect how the learner can adjust strategies for different contexts, i.e., cultivate independent action and learning abilities [24].
2.4. Independent and Self-Directed Learning Paradigms
3. Materials and Methods
Empirical Research Strategy, the Context of the School, and the Students and Teachers Involved in the Study
- Setting long-term goals, anticipating tasks to achieve the goal, and reflecting at the end of the semester. At the beginning of the school year, students set a long-term goal that they aim to achieve over the entire semester (see Figure 1).
- 2.
- Setting and reflecting on students’ weekly goals: At the beginning of each week, students set a goal they aim to achieve during the week. The goal is recorded in the diary at the beginning of the week (see Figure 3). At the end of the week, students reflect on their progress toward the goal.
- 3.
- Student’s self-assessment of the learning-to-learn competency. In the student’s diary, they evaluate their learning-to-learn competency twice (at the end of the first semester (January) and at the end of the second semester (June)) by answering 7 statements on a scale from 0 to 10 (where 0 means completely unsuccessful and 10 means completely successful):I reflect on my learning, identifying what helps and hinders my learning.When starting to learn something, I set learning goals.When I need new information, I know how to find reliable sources.I understand why I am learning.If something is not working, I look for alternative learning methods.I create a schedule to remember, organize, and plan my activities.I identify successes and failures.
4. Results
4.1. Setting Long-Term Goals for Students, Anticipating Tasks to Achieve the Goal, and Reflecting at the End of the Semester
4.2. The Students’ Anticipated Tasks to Achieve Their Long-Term Goal
4.3. Analysis of Students’ Reflections on How They Managed to Achieve Their Goal by the End of the Semester
5. Discussion and Conclusions
6. Limitations and Directions for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Caena, F.; Stringher, C. Towards a New Conceptualization of Learning to Learn. Aula Abierta 2020, 49, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying Proposal for a Council Recommendation on Key Competences for Life Long Learning; COM (2018) 24 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
- European Council. Recommendation 22 May 2018 on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. 2018/C 189/01-13; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
- Celume, M.-P.; Maoulida, H. Developing 21st Century Competencies among Youth through an Online Learning Program: BE a Global Citizen. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goren, H.; Yemini, M. Global citizenship education redefined–A systematic review of empirical studies on global citizenship education. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2017, 82, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Letina, A. Development of Students’ Learning to Learn Competence in Primary Science. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mickovska-Raleva, A. Teaching ‘Learning to Learn’ Competence for the Knowledge–Based Society; Center for Research and Policy Making: Skopje, North Macedonia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Rios-Campos, C.; Mendoza Cánova, E.S.; Aguirre Zaquinaula, I.R.; Aguirre Zaquinaula, H.E.; Vargas, D.J.; Suárez Peña, W.; Tapia Idrogo, C.E.; Yeckle Arteaga, R.M. Artificial Intelligence and Education. South Fla. J. Dev. 2023, 4, 641–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escorcia, D.; Fenouillet, F. Connaissances métacognitives et stratégies d’autorégulation impliquées dans la révision de textes: Construction et validation d’un instrument autorapporté. Mes. Éval. Édu. 2018, 41, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradinio Ugdymo Bendrosios Programos [General Programmes for Primary Education]; Švietimo Aprūpinimo Centras: Vilnius, Lithuania, 2008.
- Lietuvos Pradinio Ugdymo Bendrosios Programos [Lithuanian General Programmes for Primary Education]; Nacionalinė Švietimo Agentūra: Vilnius, Lithuania, 2022.
- Kompetencijų Raidos Aprašas [Competences Development Inventory]; Nacionalinė Švietimo Agentūra: Vilnius, Lithuania, 2021.
- Scott, C.L. Les Apprentissages de demain 1: Pourquoi changer les contenus et les méthodes d’apprentissage au XXIe siècle? Recherche et prospective en éducation. In Réflexions Thématiques; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Dignath, C.; Veenman, M.V.J. The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning–Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2021, 33, 489–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijnen, M.; Loyens, S.M.M.; Wijnia, L.; Smeets, G.; Kroeze, M.J.; Van der Molen, H.T. Is problem-based learning associated with students’ motivation? A quantitative and qualitative study. Learn. Environ. Res. 2018, 21, 173–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drake, S.M.; Reid, J. Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pac. J. Educ. Res. 2018, 1, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chernyshenko, O.S.; Kankaraš, M.; Drasgow, F. Social and Emotional Skills for Student Success and Wellbeing: Conceptual Framework for the OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills; OECD Education Working Papers No. 173; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Amalathas, E. Learning to Learn in Further Education: A Literature Review of Effective Practice in England and Abroad; CfBT Education Trust: Berkshire, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Fox, E.; Riconscente, M. Metacognition and Self-Regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2008, 20, 373–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radovon, M. Cognitive and Metacognitive Aspects of Key Competency “Learning to Learn”. Pedagogika 2019, 133, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saqr, M.; López-Pernas, S.; Jovanović, J.; Gašević, D. Intense, turbulent, or wallowing in the mire: A longitudinal study of cross-course online tactics, strategies, and trajectories. Internet High. Educ. 2023, 57, 100902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stegers-Jager, K.M.; Cohen-Schotanus, J.; Themmen, A.P.N. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med. Educ. 2012, 46, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolmans, D.H.J.M.; Loyens, S.M.M.; Marcq, H.; Gijbels, D. Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 2016, 21, 1087–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hattie, J.A.C.; Donoghue, G.M. Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. NPJ Sci. Learn. 2016, 1, 16013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Périer, P. L’autonomie de l’enfant en débat. Rech. Educ. 2014, 20, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandica, J. L’autonomie des élèves, Entre Conformisme et Affirmation. Analyse de l’activité et des Stratégies Pédagogiques de Huit Enseignant.e.s Genevois.e.s du Degré Secondaire Obligatoire. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Lahire, B. La construction de l’autonomie à l’école primaire. Rev. Française Pédagogie 2001, 134, 151–161. Available online: https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfp_0556-7807_2001_num_135_1_2812 (accessed on 20 January 2024). [CrossRef]
- Go, N. Sans cesse redessiner les gestes d’émancipation. Rech. Educ. 2014, 20, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. A study of language and cognitive aspects in primary school pupils’ and teachers’ activities through cooperative learning. Educ. Sci. Theory Pract. 2021, 21, 88–106. [Google Scholar]
- Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. The benefits of cooperative learning of language in different subject lessons as seen by primary school pupils: The case of one Lithuanian city school. Educ. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6441222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D.; Žemgulienė, A.; Sakadolskis, E.-A. Cooperative learning issues in elementary education: A Lithuanian case study. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2021, 12, 445–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, T.H. Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. Int. Rev. Educ. 2019, 65, 633–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Francis, H. The Role of Technology in Self-Directed Learning: A Literature Review; ACS Center for Inspiring Minds: Surrey, UK, 2017; Available online: https://www.academia.edu/35278698/The_role_of_technology_in_self_directed_learning_A_literature_review (accessed on 20 January 2024).
- Zimmerman, B.J.; Kitsantas, A. Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. J. Educ. Psychol. 2002, 94, 660–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koch, T.; Kralik, D. Participatory Action Research in Health Care; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Soucy, E. Création et mise en pratique d’un centre de l’oral: Recherche-Action avec Desenseignantes de 1er Cycle du Primaire. Ph.D. Thesis, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Saint-Jérôme, QC, Canada, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Soucy, E.; Dumais, C.; Moreau, A.C. Quand la recherche-action au doctorat devient possible: Place à l’artisan-chercheur. Can. J. New Sch. Educ. 2020, 11, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research and Aplications: Design and Methods, 6th ed.; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Baškarada, S. Qualitative case studies guidelines. Qual. Rep. 2014, 19, 1–25. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2559424 (accessed on 20 January 2024). [CrossRef]
- Dane, F.C.; Carhart, E. Evaluating Research: Methodology for People Who Need to Read Research; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Neelen, M.; Kirschner, P.A. Evidence-Informed Learning Design: Creating Training to Improve Performance; Kogan Page Limited: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Brand-Gruwel, S.; Kester, L.; Kicken, W.; Kirschner, P.A. Learning Ability Development in Flexible Learning Environments. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology; Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop, M.J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Locke, E.A.; Latham, G.P. The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motiv. Sci. 2019, 5, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopez, M.C. Self-generated literacy practices in disadvantaged environments in Chile. Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud. 2017, 5, 29–41. [Google Scholar]
- Putman, R.S. Technology Versus Teachers in the Early Literacy Classroom: An Investigation of the Effectiveness of the Istation Integrated Learning System. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2017, 65, 1153–1174. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1155653 (accessed on 20 January 2024). [CrossRef]
- Monobe, G.; Bintz, W.P.; McTeer, J.S. Developing English learners’ reading confidence with whole-class repeated reading. Read. Teach. 2017, 71, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jukes, M.C.H.; Mgonda, N.L.; Tibenda, J.J.; Gabrieli, P.; Jeremiah, G.; Betts, K.L.; Williams, J.; Bub, K.L. Building an assessment ofcommunity-defined social-emotional competencies from the ground up in Tanzania. Child Dev. 2021, 92, e1095–e1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLaughlin, T.; Aspden, K.; Clarke, L. How do teachers support children’s social–emotional competence? Strategies for teachers. Early Child. Folio 2017, 21, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schoon, I. Towards anIntegrative Taxonomy of Social-Emotional Competences. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 515313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Hong, Q.; Xu, J.; Liu, F.; Wen, Y.; Gu, X. Resilience Coping in Preschool Children: The Role of Emotional Ability, Age, and Gender. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5027. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/5027 (accessed on 20 January 2024).
- Green, A.L.; Ferrante, S.; Boaz, T.L.; Kutash, K.; Wheeldon-Reece, B. Social and emotional learning during early adolescence: Effectiveness of a class room based SEL program for middle school students. Psychol. Sch. 2021, 58, 1056–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domitrovich, C.E.; Durlak, J.A.; Staley, K.C.; Weissberg, R.P. Social-Emotional Competence: An Essential Factor for Promoting Positive Adjustment and Reducing Risk in School Children. Child Dev. 2017, 88, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, S.C.; Bull, R. Facilitating Social Emotional Learning in Kindergarten Classrooms: Situational Factors and Teachers’ Strategies. Int. J. Early Child. 2018, 50, 335–352. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1196196 (accessed on 20 January 2024). [CrossRef]
- Locke, E.A.; Latham, G.P. New directions in goal-setting theory. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 15, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, Y.H.; Healy, L.C.; McEwan, D. Department for HealtThe application of Goal Setting Theory to goal setting interventions in sport: A systematic review. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2023, 16, 474–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inzlicht, M.; Werner, K.M.; Briskin, J.L.; Roberts, B.W. Integrating Models of Self-Regulation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2021, 4, 319–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dotson, R. Goal setting to increase student academic performance. J. Sch. Adm. Res. Dev. 2016, 1, 44–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tolli, A.P.; Schmidt, A.M. The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy ingoal revision. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008, 93, 692–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budworth, M.-H.; Latham, G.P.; Manroop, L. Looking forward to performance improve-ment: A field test of the feedforward interview for performance management. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2015, 54, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matheson, A.; Wood, L.; Franklin, S. Guided or unguided student reflections. In Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference 2017, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 26 July 2017; Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05259 (accessed on 20 January 2024).
- Teng, M.F. Self-Regulation. In Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition: Theories, Assessment and Pedagogy; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2023; pp. 201–222. [Google Scholar]
Age | Reflection on the Learning Process | Thinking about Thinking (Metacognition) |
---|---|---|
Up to 6 years old | Learns from their activities, tries again if unsuccessful. Learns from mistakes: corrects them after making errors. The child is able to cooperate with peers to achieve a common goal. | Identifies intentions, adjusts actions in the process, compares initial intentions with the final result. Reflects on the decision-making process: specifies where, when, and under what circumstances acquired certain knowledge. |
Ages 6–8 | Recognizes the learning experience, repeats known and new information as the primary memorization strategy. Plans, monitors, and evaluates their activities, their results, and compares them with experience. Understands another person’s point of view; understands that different points of view can arise from different people different people do not have access to the same information. | Describes what they are thinking about, provides reasons. Perceives the significance of various factors in the cognitive process. |
Ages 9–10 | Distinguishes between teaching and learning. Attempts to independently group and reorganize information for better memorization. Breaks down complex tasks into steps, plans the optimal sequence of their completion. Independently plans activities, sets priorities, and determines the sequence of task completion. They see rules as agreements necessary for the common good and can negotiate and follow them when working in a small group. | Distinguishes between belief and theoretical thinking. Recognizes the importance of cause in explaining a phenomenon. Applies the repetition strategy more effectively. Focuses attention on one activity for up to an hour if it is non-monotonous and does not require constant intense thinking. |
Ages 11–12 | Evaluates the use of memory in acquiring knowledge. Actively seeks to connect new information with existing knowledge. Can perceive and take into account the alternative viewpoints of several other people, as well as the perceptions of social groups can understand the views of social groups and reflect on situations from different social and cultural perspectives. | Associates new information with existing knowledge. Aims to memorize information, effectively applies information organization strategies. |
Learning to Learn Component | Characteristics of the Component |
---|---|
Self-awareness and self-esteem skills | recognizes, identifies, and manages emotions, behaves according to values; recognizes personal traits and seeks external assistance; strives for personal and academic goals |
Empathy, social awareness, and building positive interpersonal relationships | recognizes and responds to the emotions of others; recognizes individual and group similarities and differences; effectively uses communication skills for efficient communication; can constructively prevent, manage, and resolve interpersonal conflicts |
Responsible decision-making and behaviour considering consequences | makes decisions considering safety, ethical, and societal factors; applies responsible decision-making skills in everyday academic and social situations; contributes to the well-being of family, school, and community |
Metacognition | can think about their thinking, has self-confidence, adapts to changing conditions, learning content, team members, and context—sets goals, knows how to learn best, and uses creativity; thinks critically |
Teachers | Qualification | The Total Work Experience in the School | Work Experience at the Researched School |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | Qualification of the primary school teacher | 21 years | 3 years |
T2 | Qualification of the primary school teacher | 2 years | 2 years |
T3 | Qualification of the primary school teacher | 8 years | 3 years |
T4 | Qualification of the primary school teacher | 12 years | 3 years |
The Goal Is Related to Learning a Specific Subject | Goals Related to Social, Emotional, and Health Education Competencies | Goal Related to Teaching/Learning Strategies | |||||
Lithuanian Language | Mathematic | Foreign Language | Other | Personal Qualities | Emotions and Feelings | Healthy Lifestyle | |
N = 14 | N = 7 | N = 1 | N = 2 | N = 8 | N = 5 | N = 7 | N = 6 |
Areas of Lithuanian Language Subject | |||
---|---|---|---|
Goals related to learning grammar rules | Goals related to improving correct spelling/writing in a diary | Goals related to improving reading skills and comprehension of texts | Goals covering all areas of learning |
N = 4 | N = 3 | N = 5 | N = 2 |
Areas of the Mathematics Subject | |||
---|---|---|---|
Learning Multiplication | Action Calculation | Textual Problem Solving | Goals Encompassing All Areas of Learning |
N = 3 | N = 1 | N = 1 | N = 2 |
Areas of Personal Qualities | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Critical Thinking | Activity | Diligence | Courage | To Be the Smartest |
N = 1 | N = 1 | N = 1 | N = 2 | N = 1 |
Areas of Emotions and Feelings | ||
---|---|---|
Learn to Recognize and Express Emotions | Manage Anger | Understand Emotions |
N = 3 | N = 1 | N = 1 |
Areas of a Healthy Lifestyle | |||
---|---|---|---|
Sport | Healthy Eating | Active Leisure | Goal Covering All Areas |
N = 4 | N = 1 | N = 1 | N = 1 |
Areas of Learning Strategies | ||
---|---|---|
Time Management | Seeking Suitable Ways to Learn | Setting Goals |
N = 3 | N = 2 | N = 1 |
1 Task | 2 Tasks | 3 Tasks | 4 and More Tasks |
---|---|---|---|
N = 15 | N = 20 | N = 11 | N = 4 |
Succeeded in Achieving | Failed to Achieve | Did Not Write a Reflection | Achieved, Partially, Need to Continue Improving |
---|---|---|---|
N = 34 | N = 9 | N = 2 | N = 5 |
Categories | Number of Students | Comments Written by Students |
---|---|---|
The number of errors decreased | N = 2 | I make fewer mistakes. I already make fewer mistakes. |
Improved writing skills | N = 3 | I definitely write more beautifully. I tried my best. I think I write more beautifully. The teacher praised me. I succeeded in improving my handwriting because I received praise from the teacher. |
Improved reading skills | N = 3 | I delve more into the text. I read a lot and wrote a lot. I improved my reading. I read every day. I tried and wanted to. |
Improved mathematical abilities | N = 4 | I studied a lot of mathematics, solved more problems. I do well on tests, and it’s enough for me. I tried to learn the multiplication table at home and at school. I understand textual problems better now. |
Dedicated more time to learning | N = 3 | I study very often. I studied a lot; I had to spend more time. I put in a lot of time and effort. I didn’t always listen well. |
Student mentions that he succeeded or learned | N = 7 | I learned. I succeeded. I suggested, and I succeeded. I managed to speak without offending. I succeeded. Every day, I spend an hour outside for sure. I managed to achieve 75 percent. But I learned to raise my hand and ask. |
Student is happy with the achievement | N = 4 | I’m glad that I achieved everything because I tried very hard to reach it. I am a little scholar. I am happy that I succeeded. I thought about what I did and I’m happy about it. |
Improved social, emotional, and health-related competencies | N = 6 | Many friends like to play with me. I gained courage and express my opinion all the time. When I get angry, I breathe, and if necessary, I leave the classroom. I started eating less sweets. I spend more time outdoors. Better results in ice hockey because I practiced every day. I focused. |
Improved digital competence | N = 2 | I know how to use the internet. I did many independent tasks on the computer. I checked the conditions more than once. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ponomariovienė, J.; Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. Solutions for Independent Goal Setting and Implementation of Primary School Students Fostering the Competence of Learning to Learn. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040368
Ponomariovienė J, Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė D. Solutions for Independent Goal Setting and Implementation of Primary School Students Fostering the Competence of Learning to Learn. Education Sciences. 2024; 14(4):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040368
Chicago/Turabian StylePonomariovienė, Jovita, and Daiva Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė. 2024. "Solutions for Independent Goal Setting and Implementation of Primary School Students Fostering the Competence of Learning to Learn" Education Sciences 14, no. 4: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040368
APA StylePonomariovienė, J., & Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. (2024). Solutions for Independent Goal Setting and Implementation of Primary School Students Fostering the Competence of Learning to Learn. Education Sciences, 14(4), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040368