Qualitative Evaluation of Scaffolded Teaching Materials in Business Analysis Classes: How to Support the Learning Process of Young Entrepreneurs
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Business Studies Education for the Younger Generation
1.2. Research Gap
1.3. Rationale and Objectives of the Study
2. Literature Review
2.1. Creativity in Entrepreneurial Learning
2.2. Social Learning Theory
2.3. Competence
3. Methodology
3.1. Analytical Framework
3.1.1. Outline of the Unit
3.1.2. Established Models for Business Analysis
3.1.3. Analytical Approach for the Next Phase of Reflection
3.2. Questionnaire Design
3.3. Data Collection Method
3.4. Data Collection and Analysis Plan
4. Analysis and Discussion
4.1. Holistic Evaluation for Supportive Learning Materials
4.2. Evaluation of Established Analytical Models (before the Module)
‘We have learned and shared live case studies via established models, like gamification’(P6)
‘I have already experienced learning from existing models, but there are many aspects that do not add up. There are probably too many scales, aspects and factors to be embodied in one’s own context’(P9)
‘Models and theories learned in textbooks can be understood in the head’(P11)
‘It would be essential for entrepreneurs to understand the trends in active business by putting them into a model, but to do so… it is not that easy!’(P4)
‘…established models provide a generic learning perspective, and it is a bit hard to imagine how to actually use them when you are in charge of your own company’(P15)
‘The information that you find in textbooks is good to learn in school, but what about in practice?’(P16)
4.3. The Applicability of the Scaffolding Material in Business Learning (after the Module)
‘With just one template to write on and discuss, a concise skeleton emerged in our minds, and we realised that beyond general discussions and textbook findings on CSR and business strategy, such a simple and clear tool for practical entrepreneurship education would be useful for reflection’(P3)
‘The experimental modules were just fun, quick, crisp work, discussion and sharing ideas with the class. The template is useful for quality-over-quantity learning’(P6)
‘Template-based learning not only facilitated reflection and the propagation of awareness, but also acted as a catalyst for learning through interaction with classmates’(P10)
‘The discussion around the template also showcased the individual findings of the participants and, as one of the outcomes of the template-based theoretical learning, reaffirmed that we really feel that we want to proactively contribute to the strategic sustainability of society and business in our own country’(P26)
‘SWOT is an easy-to-use model, but has weaknesses and threats, [there are weaknesses regarding] internal systems and human resources and institutional failures, as there were family ties, which, in the real business world, are key, the reality of traditional and indigenous institutions such as religion, co-operatives and trade associations compensating for this is not found in textbooks’(P16)
‘For example, organisational culture, such as a shared mission and values, affinity for technology and openness to collaborate outside the organisation, have been discarded as economic indicators, but these factors are not incorporated into existing established models’(P8)
‘Participation in the process of creating the templates may lead to the acquisition of learning outcomes. We should be interested in the process of creating the templates’(P12)
4.4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
5.1. Theoretical Contributions
5.2. Practical Contributions
5.3. Limitations and Further Research Opportunities
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
References
- Omeihe, K.O.; Simba, A.; Rae, D.; Gustafsson, V.; Khan, M.S.S. Trusting in indigenous institutions: Exporting SMEs in Nigeria. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2021, 28, 1117–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.L.; Chugh, H. Entrepreneurial learning: Past research and future challenges. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2014, 16, 24–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weng, X.; Chiu, T.K.; Tsang, C.C. Promoting student creativity and entrepreneurship through real-world problem-based maker education. Think. Ski. Creat. 2022, 45, 101046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufman, J.C.; Glăveanu, V.P. An overview of creativity theories. In Creativity: An Introduction; Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 17–30. [Google Scholar]
- Supena, I.; Darmuki, A.; Hariyadi, A. The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. Instruction 2021, 14, 873–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, P. Best Practice Creativity; Gower Publishing, Ltd.: Farnham Surrey, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Guilford, J.P. Creativity. Am. Psychol. 1950, 5, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torrance, E.P. Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Directions Manual and Scoring Guide, Verbal Test Booklet B; Scholastic Testing Service: Bensenville, IL, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Norman, D.A. Cognitive artifacts. Des. Interact. Psychol. Hum.–Comput. Interface 1991, 1, 17–38. [Google Scholar]
- Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1986; pp. 23–28. [Google Scholar]
- Bogatyreva, K.; Edelman, L.F.; Manolova, T.S.; Osiyevskyy, O.; Shirokova, G. When do entrepreneurial intentions lead to actions? The role of national culture. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 96, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychol. 2001, 3, 265–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Bernard, M.; Comunian, R.; Gross, J. Cultural and creative ecosystems: A re-view of theories and methods, toward a new research agenda. Cult. Trends 2022, 31, 332–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatnagar, B.L.; Xie, X.; Petrov, I.A.; Sminchisescu, C.; Theobalt, C.; Pons-Moll, G. Behave: Dataset and Method for Tracking Human Object Interactions. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 15935–15946. [Google Scholar]
- Fry, L.W. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadersh. Q. 2003, 14, 693–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schumpeter, J.A. The Theory of Economic Development; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1912. [Google Scholar]
- Joensuu-Salo, S.; Viljamaa, A.; Varamäki, E. Sustainable entrepreneurs of the future: The interplay between educational context, sustainable entrepreneurship competence, and entrepreneurial intentions. Adm. Sci. 2022, 12, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.; Guampe, F.A.; Maruf, M.I. Entrepreneurship learning, positive psychological capital and entrepreneur competence of students: A research study. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2019, 7, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mets, T.; Raudsaar, M.; Vahejõe, K.; Kaseorg, M.; Vettik-Leemet, P. Putting entrepreneurial process competence into the focus in entrepreneurship education: Experience from Estonian universities. Adm. Sci. 2022, 12, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Business Insider. Banking Industry 2022: Overview, Trends & Analysis of Banking Sector. Available online: https://www.businessinsider.com/banking-industry-trends?r=US&IR=T (accessed on 15 February 2022).
- Top 1000 World Banks. 2021. Available online: https://www.thebanker.com/Top-1000-World-Banks/The-Top-1000-World-Banks-2021?ct=true8 (accessed on 6 March 2023).
- Adams, C.A.; Abhayawansa, S. Connecting the COVID-19 pandemic, environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing and calls for ‘harmonisation’of sustainability reporting. Crit. Perspect. Account. 2022, 82, 102309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinçer, H.; Pınarbaşı, F. PESTEL analysis-based evaluation of marketings in the European banking sector: An application with IT2 fuzzy DEMATEL. In Handbook of Research on Decision-Making Techniques in Financial Marketing; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 429–448. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, M.E. The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2008, 86, 78–93. [Google Scholar]
- Dobbs, E.M. Guidelines for applying Porter’s five forces framework: A set of industry analysis templates. Compet. Rev. 2014, 24, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wronka, C. Financial crime in the decentralized finance ecosystem: New challenges for compliance. J. Financ. Crime 2021, 30, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diener, F.; Špaček, M. Digital transformation in banking: A managerial perspective on barriers to change. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balasubramanian, L.N. Human capital and ethical bank governance. In Transformational Leadership in Banking: Challenges of Governance, Leadership and HR in a Digital and Disruptive World; SAGE: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2021; p. 67. [Google Scholar]
- Boot, A.; Hoffmann, P.; Laeven, L.; Ratnovski, L. Fintech: What’s old, what’s new? J. Financ. Stab. 2021, 53, 10086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syafarudin, A. The effect of product quality on customer satisfaction implications on customer loyalty in the era COVID-19. Ilomata Int. J. Tax Account. 2021, 2, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malterud, K.; Siersma, V.D.; Guassora, A.D. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qual. Health Res. 2016, 26, 1753–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Higuchi, K. KH Coder 3 Reference Manual; Ritsumeikan University: Kioto, Japan, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Farrokhnia, M.; Baggen, Y.; Biemans, H.; Noroozi, O. Bridging the fields of entrepreneurship and education: The role of philosophical perspectives in fostering opportunity identification. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2022, 20, 100632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aruqaj, B. Social Cohesion in European Societies: Conceptualising and Assessing Togetherness; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Henderson, R.W.; Cunningham, L. Creating interactive sociocultural environments for self-regulated learning. In Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance; Routledge: Oxon, UK, 2023; pp. 255–281. [Google Scholar]
- Dimov, D.; Maula, M.; Romme, A.G.L. Crafting and assessing design science research for entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2022, 10422587221128271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Lee, H. The effect of CSR fit and CSR authenticity on the brand attitude. Sustainability 2020, 12, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gerner, M. Assessing and managing sustainability in international perspective: Corporate sustainability across cultures—towards a strategic framework implementation approach. Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2019, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gronfula, A.G.M. The Linkage between CSR Beliefs and Ethical Behaviour and Its Influences on Consumer Attitudes towards the Retail Sector in the UK; Brunel University: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Omeihe, I.; Harrison, C.; Simba, A.; Omeihe, K. The role of the entrepreneurial leader: A study of Nigerian SMEs. Int. J. Entrep. Small Bus. 2020. Available online: https://research-portal.uws.ac.uk/en/publications/the-role-of-the-entrepreneurial-leader-a-study-of-nigerian-smes (accessed on 6 March 2023).
- Murray, A.; Crammond, R.J.; Omeihe, K.O.; Scuotto, V. Establishing successful methods of entrepreneurship education in nurturing new entrepreneurs. JoHESSM 2018, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Soto Hernández, D.; González Gálvez, M.; di Giminiani, P. Innovation as translation in Indigenous entrepreneurship: Lessons from Mapuche entrepreneurs in Chile. Can. J. Dev. Stud. 2022, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laasch, O. An actor-network perspective on business models: How ‘being responsible’ led to incremental but pervasive change. Long Range Plan. 2019, 52, 406–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Oe, H.; Tanaka, C. Qualitative Evaluation of Scaffolded Teaching Materials in Business Analysis Classes: How to Support the Learning Process of Young Entrepreneurs. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030311
Oe H, Tanaka C. Qualitative Evaluation of Scaffolded Teaching Materials in Business Analysis Classes: How to Support the Learning Process of Young Entrepreneurs. Education Sciences. 2023; 13(3):311. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030311
Chicago/Turabian StyleOe, Hiroko, and Chizuru Tanaka. 2023. "Qualitative Evaluation of Scaffolded Teaching Materials in Business Analysis Classes: How to Support the Learning Process of Young Entrepreneurs" Education Sciences 13, no. 3: 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030311
APA StyleOe, H., & Tanaka, C. (2023). Qualitative Evaluation of Scaffolded Teaching Materials in Business Analysis Classes: How to Support the Learning Process of Young Entrepreneurs. Education Sciences, 13(3), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030311