Next Article in Journal
Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of Brief COPE in Russian Schoolteachers
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Learning Experience of High-Performing Preclinical Undergraduate Dental Students: A Qualitative Study
Previous Article in Journal
How and under Which Conditions Can We Best Combine Research on School Effectiveness with Research on School Improvement? Establishing Connections Using the Dynamic Approach to School Improvement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Metaverse, Crypto, and NFTs in Dentistry

by
Kelvin I. Afrashtehfar
1,2 and
Aiman S. H. Abu-Fanas
1,*
1
Evidence-Based Practice Unit, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman City P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates
2
Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, 3010 Berne, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(8), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080538
Submission received: 24 July 2022 / Accepted: 3 August 2022 / Published: 10 August 2022
The dental community has expressed a growing interest in the metaverse and its applications. In fact, our PubMed search up till July 2022 (metaverse AND (stomatology or dental or dentistry or oral)) found three indexed manuscripts discussing the metaverse in dentistry [1,2,3]. Coincidently, all these recent publications were found in the British Dental Journal. This speaks well about the openness to discuss this nontraditional topic, which may be primarily attractive to early technology adopters. The metaverse is a virtual environment that simulates the natural world via multisensory interactions with 3D objects. In other words, the metaverse ecosystem is a 3D world simulation or twin world. We have previously witnessed the introduction of digital technologies to reconstructive dentistry [4,5,6] implant dentistry [7,8] aesthetic dentistry [9,10] orthodontics [11,12,13] etc., and the implementation of the digital workflow to our practice and the educational setting has proven its efficiency, such as a reduction in waste, time, increased cost effectiveness, reduction in the time and number of appointments, increase in predictability through improved treatment planning, and enhanced patient satisfaction [14,15,16]. More recently, the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) has simplified the diagnosis of clinical cases and planning, patient treatment acceptance, as well as the learning experience of our dental students [17]. Indeed, these technologies could facilitate the implementation an evidence-based practice [17,18,19,20,21]. The coronavirus pandemic also helped the rapid advancement and adoption of teaching technologies in dental education [14,15] such as the flipped classroom [22]. The demand for oral health education using virtual platforms is a reality.
Interestingly, medical schools have successfully worked directly within VR using haptic technology [3]. Metalearning could provide higher oral health education access to schoolchildren, underprivileged people, caregivers, and clinicians [1]. Dental lectures and courses in the metaverse offer another opportunity for dental education. This teaching delivery method has the potential to offer quantifiable improvements over traditional methods besides student satisfaction [22]. The metaverse could advance clinical decision support systems and become a working platform for healthcare researchers.
We have already been warned that most virtual meetings are likely to soon be held in the metaverse with digital avatars, [2] including dental telehealth conversations. Additionally, it is possible to see (in live view) the exact 3D implant position and bone at the time of implant surgery, similar to what is already happening with dynamic navigation [23].
Children or dental phobic patients can familiarize themselves with the office atmosphere and facilitate their future dental visits to be treated. In general, through the metaverse, patients can now have a different dental experience option. With this, barriers between the government and private sector are anticipated to reduce, and health insurance is likely to become involved; however, the global security of virtual platforms should be ensured.
The blockchain is an entirely digital accounting ledger system that records transactions across many computers (holographic cards or networks), which restricts retroactively altering subsequent blocks or the network consensus. In other words, each registered block is considered currency (e.g., Bitcoin), a finite resource carrying a digital code that cannot be falsified. Smart contracts, such as "tokens" and "NFTs" (nonfungible tokens), have been developed on blockchain technology. Payments are instant, and transaction fees are minimal. Thus, patients would be able to buy real and virtual goods or services with cryptocurrency. For instance, patients could mint an NFT with a dental membership or loyalty benefits, such as free access or discounts to dental consults, check-ups, instructional videos, prophylaxis, or avatar accessories (e.g., dental jewellery or grillz). Consequently, dental practices can benefit from the marketing potential of their metaverse presence.
The metaverse is certainly an excellent platform to promote oral health, wellbeing, and access to more people [1]. However, people-to-people communication continues to be fundamental [2] until AI proves the opposite. Without a doubt, the metaverse is expected to become a platform for oral healthcare services integrated into our everyday life. It is up to us to decide when to jump into the twin digital world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.I.A.; investigation, A.S.H.A.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.H.A.-F. and K.I.A.; writing—review and editing, A.S.H.A.-F. and K.I.A.; project administration, K.I.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Albujeer, A.; Khoshnevisan, M. Metaverse and oral health promotion. Br. Dent. J. 2022, 232, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kurian, N.; Cherian, J.M.; Varghese, K.G. Dentistry in the metaverse. Br. Dent. J. 2022, 232, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Locurcio, L.L. Dental education in the Metaverse. Br. Dent. J. 2022, 232, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hasanzade, M.; Shirani, M.; Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Naseri, P.; Alikhasi, M. In vivo and in vitro comparison of internal and marginal fit of digital and conventional impressions for full-coverage fixed restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Evid. Based. Dent. Pract. 2019, 19, 236–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nuytens, P.; D’haese, R.; Vandeweghe, S. Reliability and time efficiency of digital vs. analog bite registration technique for the manufacture of full-arch fixed implant prostheses. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hasanzade, M.; Aminikhah, M.; Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Alikhasi, M. Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 126, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Bryant, S.R. Understanding the lived experience of north american dental patients with a single-tooth implant in the upper front region of the mouth: Protocol for a qualitative study. JMIR. Res. Protoc. 2021, 10, e25767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, J.W.; Liu, Q.; Yue, Z.G.; Hou, J.X.; Afrashtehfar, K.I. Digital workflow for full-arch immediate implant placement using a stackable surgical guide fabricated using SLM technology. J. Prosthodont. 2021, 30, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Assery, M.K. Five considerations in cosmetic and esthetic dentistry. J. N. J. Dent. Assoc. 2014, 85, 14–15. [Google Scholar]
  10. Alikhasi, M.; Yousefi, P.; Afrashtehfar, K.I. Smile design: Mechanical considerations. Dent. Clin. North. Am. 2022, 66, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Qadeer, S. Computerized occlusal analysis as an alternative occlusal indicator. CRANIO® 2016, 34, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Christopoulou, I.; Kaklamanos, E.G.; Makrygiannakis, M.A.; Bitsanis, I.; Perlea, P.; Tsolakis, A.I. Intraoral scanners in Orthodontics: A critical review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Afrashtehfar, K.I. Patient and miniscrew implant factors influence the success of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Evid. Based. Dent. 2016, 17, 109–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Park, J.C.; Kwon, H.E.; Chung, C.W. Innovative digital tools for new trends in teaching and assessment methods in medical and dental education. J. Educ. Eval. Health. Prof. 2021, 18, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Uoshima, K.; Akiba, N.; Nagasawa, M. Technical skill training and assessment in dental education. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2021, 57, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Alnakeb, N.A.; Assery, M.K.M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners versus traditional impressions: A rapid umbrella review. J. Evid. Base Dent. Pract. 2022, 101719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Yang, J.-W.; Al-Sammarraie, A.A.H.; Chen, H.; Saeed, M.H. Pre-clinical undergraduate students’ perspectives on the adoption of virtual and augmented reality to their dental learning experience. F1000Research 2021, 10, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Assery, M.K. From dental science to clinical practice: Knowledge translation and evidence-based dentistry principles. Saudi. Dent. J. 2017, 29, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Afrashtehfar, K.I. Use of evidence-based practice among new dental graduates needs improving. Br. Dent. J. 2022, 232, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Eimar, H.; Yassine, R.; Abi-Nader, S.; Tamimi, F. Evidence-based dentistry for planning restorative treatments: Barriers and potential solutions. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2017, 21, e7–e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Afrashtehfar , K.I.; Tamimi, F. An online tool that provides access to evidence-based literature on dental restorations: www.crownorfill.com. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2017, 118, 696–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Maatouk, R.M.; McCullagh, A.P.G. Flipped classroom questions. Br. Dent. J. 2022, 232, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Afrashtehfar, K.I. Conventional free-hand, dynamic navigation and static guided implant surgery produce similar short-term patient-reported outcome measures and experiences. Evid. Based Dent. 2022, 22, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Abu-Fanas, A.S.H. Metaverse, Crypto, and NFTs in Dentistry. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080538

AMA Style

Afrashtehfar KI, Abu-Fanas ASH. Metaverse, Crypto, and NFTs in Dentistry. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(8):538. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Afrashtehfar, Kelvin I., and Aiman S. H. Abu-Fanas. 2022. "Metaverse, Crypto, and NFTs in Dentistry" Education Sciences 12, no. 8: 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080538

APA Style

Afrashtehfar, K. I., & Abu-Fanas, A. S. H. (2022). Metaverse, Crypto, and NFTs in Dentistry. Education Sciences, 12(8), 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop