Integrating beyond Content: A Framework for Infusing Elementary STEM-Focused Schools Components into Full-Service Community Schools
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Inclusive STEM Schools
2.1.1. School Purpose and Process
2.1.2. Community Relationships
2.1.3. School Staff
2.1.4. School STEM Resources
2.1.5. STEM Program
2.2. Full-Service Community Schools (FSCS)
2.2.1. FSCS Pillars
2.2.2. FSCS Research
3. Integrating Elementary STEM Themes from Critical Components with FSCS Pillars
3.1. Integrated Student Supports
3.2. Expanded Learning Time and Opportunities
3.3. Family and Community Engagement
3.4. Collaborative Leadership and Practice
4. FSCS and STEM Integration (FSCSeSTEM) Using Design-Based Research
4.1. Phase I—Informed Exploration
4.2. Phase II—Enactment
- What conditions in the FSCS have resulted in the need for a STEM-focused FSCS?
- What are the FSCS needs and assets?
- What are the specific desired results (outputs, outcomes, and long-term impacts)?
- What are the factors that facilitate or impede change?
- What strategies are needed to achieve the intended results?
- Why do the FSCS partners believe these strategies will lead to these intended results?
4.3. Phase III—Local Impact
4.4. Phase IV—Broad Impact
|
|
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Johnson, C.C. Conceptualizing Integrated STEM Education. Sch. Sci. Math. 2013, 113, 367–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, T.J.; Johnston, A.C.; Glancy, A.W. STEM Integration: A Synthesis of Conceptual Frameworks and Definitions. In Handbook of Research on STEM Education; Taylor & Francis: Oxfordshire, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Becker, K.; Park, K. Effects of Integrative Approaches among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students’ Learning: A Preliminary Meta-Analysis. J. STEM Educ. 2011, 12, 23–37. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, C.C.; Peters-Burton, E.E.; Moore, T.J. (Eds.) STEM Road Map 2.0: A Framework for Integrated STEM Education in the Innovation Age; Routledge: England, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Roehrig, G.H.; Moore, T.J.; Wang, H.-H.; Park, M.S. Is Adding the E Enough? Investigating the Impact of K-12 Engineering Standards on the Implementation of STEM Integration. Sch. Sci. Math. 2012, 119, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, C.C.; Sondergeld, T.A. Outcomes of an integrated STEM high school: Enabling access and achievement for all students. Urban Educ. 2020, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiswall, M.; Stiefel, L.; Schwartz, A.E.; Boccardo, J. Does Attending a STEM High School Improve Student Performance? Evidence from New York City. Econ. Educ. Rev. 2014, 40, 93–105. [Google Scholar]
- San Pedro, M.O.; Ocumpaugh, J.; Baker, R.S.; Heffernan, N.T. Predicting STEM and Non-STEM College Major Enrollment from Middle School Interaction with Mathematics Educational Software. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, 24 February 2014; pp. 276–279. [Google Scholar]
- Sass, T.R. Understanding the STEM Pipeline. Working paper (American Institutes for Research. Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research), No. 125. American Institutes for Research. 2015. Available online: http://www.caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/WP%20125.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2022).
- Wyss, V.L.; Heulskamp, D.; Siebert, C.J. Increasing Middle School Student Interest in STEM Careers with Videos of Scientists. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 2012, 7, 501–522. [Google Scholar]
- National Science Board. The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022: Science and Engineering Indicators; National Science Foundation; National Science Board: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2022. Available online: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221 (accessed on 26 May 2022).
- Margot, K.C.; Kettler, T. Teachers’ Perception of STEM Integration and Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2019, 6, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sondergeld, T.A.; Provinzano, K.; Johnson, C.C. Investigating the impact of an urban community school effort on middle school STEM-related student outcomes over time through propensity score matched methods. Sch. Sci. Math. J. 2020, 120, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- House, A.; Peters-Burton, E.E.; Peters Hinton, V.; Remold, J.; Levin-Guracar, E. Critical components of STEM-focused elementary schools. J. High. Educ. Theory Pract. 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maier, A.; Daniel, J.; Oakes, J.; Lam, L. Community Schools as an Effective Improvement Strategy: A Review of the Evidence; Learning Policy Institute; National Education Policy Center: Boulder, CO, USA, 2017; Available online: https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Community_Schools_Effective_REPORT.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2022).
- Bannan-Ritland, B. The Role of Design in Research: The Integrative Learning Design Framework. Educ. Res. 2003, 32, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obama, B. Remarks by the President State of the Union Address. 2013. Available online: http://www.obamawhitehouse.archives.gov (accessed on 23 May 2022).
- Lynch, S.J.; Peters-Burton, E.E.; Behrend, T.; House, A.; Ford, M.; Spillane, N.; Matray, S.; Han, E.; Means, B. Understanding inclusive STEM high schools as opportunity structures for underrepresented students: Critical components. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2018, 55, 712–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- National Research Council. Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identify Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
- Lynch, S.J.; House, A.; Peters-Burton, E.; Behrend, T.; Means, B.; Ford, M.; Spillane, N.; Matray, S.; Moore, I.; Coyne, C.; et al. A Logic Model That Describes and Explains Eight Exemplary STEM-Focused High Schools with Diverse Student Populations; The George Washington University OSPrI Project: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Dare, E.A.; Ellis, J.A.; Roehrig, G.H. Understanding Science Teachers’ Implementations of Integrated STEM Curricular Units Through a Phenomenological Multiple Case Study. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2018, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LaForce, M.; Noble, E.; King, H.; Century, J.; Blackwell, C.; Holt, S.; Ibrahim, A.; Loo, S. The Eight Essential Elements of Inclusive STEM High Schools. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2016, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- National Research Council. Monitoring Progress toward Successful K-12 STEM Education: A Nation Advancing? The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
- Nesmith, S.M.; Cooper, S. Engineering Process as a Focus: STEM Professional Development with Elementary STEM-Focused Professional Development Schools. Sch. Sci. Math. 2019, 119, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters-Burton, E.E.; Behrend, T.; Lynch, S.J.; Means, B. Inclusive STEM high school design: 10 critical components. Theory Pract. 2014, 53, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tofel-Grehl, C.; Callahan, C. STEM High School Communities: Common and Differing Features. J. Adv. Acad. 2014, 25, 237–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, T.L. From Positivism to Critical Theory: School-Community Relations toward Community Equity Literacy. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 2017, 30, 370–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holme, J.J.; Castro, A.J.; Germain, E.; Haynes, M.; Sikes, C.L.; Barnes, M. Community Schools as an Urban School Reform Strategy: Examining Partnerships, Governance, and Sustainability Through the Lens of the Full-Service Community Schools Grant Program. Educ. Pol. 2020, 36, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lash, C.L.; Sanchez, M. Place-Based Reform in the Context of Neighborhood Change: A Case Study of the Mission Promise Neighborhood. Educ. Urban Soc. 2019, 51, 613–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinn, J.; Blank, M. Twenty Years, Ten Lessons: Community Schools as an Equitable School Improvement Strategy. The Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools. NYU Steinhardt. Voices Urban Educ. 2022, 49, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bronstein, L.R.; Mason, S.E. School-Linked Services: Promoting Equity for Children, Families, and Communities; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Galindo, C.L.; Sanders, M.G. Teachers’ academic optimism and professional practice in an urban full-service community high school. J. Educ. Change 2021, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, M.; Anderson, J.A.; Chen, M. What Do We Know about Full-Service Community Schools? Integrative Research Review with NVivo. Sch. Community J. 2017, 27, 29–54. [Google Scholar]
- Blank, M.J.; Villarreal, L. Where It All Comes Together: How Partnerships Connect Communities and Schools. Am. Educator 2015, 39, 4–10. [Google Scholar]
- Blank, M.; Jacobson, R.; Melaville, A. Achieving Results through Community School Partnerships: How District and Community Leaders are Building Effective, Sustainable Relationships; Center for American Progress: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; Available online: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/achieving-results-through-community-school-partnerships/ (accessed on 3 June 2022).
- Dryfoos, J.; Maquire, S. Inside Full-Service Community Schools; Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Malone, H.J. Community Schools: Bridging Educational Change through Partnerships. J. Educ. Change 2020, 21, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frankl, E. Community Schools: Transforming Struggling Schools into Thriving Schools; Center for Popular Democracy: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Lubell, E. Building Community Schools: A Guide for Action; Children’s Aid Society: New York, NY, USA, 2011. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED540950 (accessed on 23 May 2022).
- Community Schools Playbook. A Project of the Partnership for the Future of Learning. Available online: https://communityschools.futureforlearning.org (accessed on 3 June 2022).
- Heers, M.; Klaveren, C.V.; Groot, W.; van den Brink, H.M. Community Schools: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Rev. Educ. Res. 2016, 86, 1016–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Provinzano, K.; Sondergeld, T.A.; Ammar, A.A.; Meloche, A. A community school reform initiative for middle grades urban and newcomer students: Using mixed methods to examine student academic and non-academic outcomes over time and compared to a matched sample. J. Educ. Stud. Placed Risk 2020, 25, 293–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biag, M.; Castrechini, S. Coordinated Strategies to Help the Whole Child: Examining the Contributions of Full-Service Community Schools. J. Educ. Stud. Placed Risk 2016, 21, 157–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houser, J.H.W. Community and School-Sponsored Program Participation and Academic Achievement in a Full-Service Community School. Educ. Urban Soc. 2016, 48, 324–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castrechini, S.; London, R.A. Positive Student Outcomes in Community Schools; Center for American Progress: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; Available online: https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wpcontent/uploads/issues/2012/02/pdf/positive_student_outcomes.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2022).
- Archer, M.; DeWitt, J.; Davenport, C.; Keenan, O.; Coghill, L.; Christodoulou, A.; Durbin, S.; Campbell, H.; Hou, L. Going Beyond the One-Off: How Can STEM Engagement Programmes with Young People have Real Lasting Impact? Res. All 2021, 5, 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, M.A.; Berube, A. Vibrant Neighborhoods, Successful Schools: What the Federal Government Can Do to Foster Both; The Urban Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; Available online: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/30516/411927-Vibrant-Neighborhoods-Successful-Schools.PDF (accessed on 23 May 2022).
- Jones, C.A. Uplifting the Whole Child: Using Wraparound Services to Overcome Social Barriers to Learning; Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center: Boston, MA, USA, 2014; Available online: https://www.massbudget.org/reports/pdf/UpliftingTheWholeChild.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2022).
- Putnam, R.D. Our kids: The American Dream in Crisis. Simon and Schuster. 2016. Available online: https://wcfia.harvard.edu/publications/our-kids-american-dream-crisis (accessed on 23 May 2022).
- Jacobson, R.; Jamal, S.S.; Jacobson, L.; Blank, M.J. The growing convergence of community schools and expanded learning opportunities. In The Coalition for Community Schools, Institute for Educational Leadership; Coalition for Community Schools: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557083.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Provinzano, K.; Mayger, L.K. Betwixt and between justice and inaction: Full-service community school principals and Community Equity Literacy. Urban Educ. 2022, 1–32, ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, T.L.; Castro, A.J.; Lowe, T.; Sikes, C.; Gururaj, S.; Mba, C. Reconsidering School Improvement Through the Community Equity Literacy Leadership Assessment (CELLA) for Principals. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2019, 34, 417–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayger, L.; Provinzano, K. Community school leadership: Identifying qualities necessary for developing and supporting equity-centered principals. Leadersh. Policy Sch. 2020, 1–22, ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penuel, W.R. Infrastructuring as a Practice of Design-Based Research for Supporting and Studying Equitable Implementation and Sustainability of Innovations. J. Learn. Sci. 2019, 28, 659–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waters, S.; Schroeder, B.; D’Augustino, T. Place-Based Education. Connect. Sci. Learn. 2018, 1. Available online: https://www.nsta.org/connected-science-learning/connected-science-learning-july-september-2018-0 (accessed on 3 June 2022).
- Henrick, E.C.; Cobb, P.; Penuel, W.R.; Jackson, K.; Clark, T. Assessing Research-Practice Partnerships: Five Dimensions of Effectiveness; William, T., Ed.; Grant Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Available online: https://wtgrantfoundation.org/library/uploads/2017/10/Assessing-Research-Practice-Partnerships.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2022).
- Joseph, D. The Practice of Design-Based Research: Uncovering the Interplay between Design, Research, and the Real-World Context. Educ. Psychol. 2004, 39, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Middleton, J.; Gorard, S.; Taylor, C.; Bannan-Ritland, B. The “Compleat” Design Experiment: From Soup to Nuts. In Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning and Teaching; Kelly, A.E., Lesh, R.A., Baek, J.Y., Eds.; Routledge: England, UK, 2018; pp. 21–46. [Google Scholar]
- Scott, E.E.; Wenderoth, M.P.; Doherty, J.H. Design-Based Research: A Methodology to Extend and Enrich Biology Education Research. Cross-Disc. Res. Biol. Educ. 2020, 19, es11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Collins, A.; Joseph, D.; Bielaczyc, K. Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. J. Learn. Sci. 2004, 13, 15–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bannan, B. GO Inquire-Geological Observational Inquiry: Cycles of Design Research. In Educational Design Research–Part B: Illustrative Cases; Plomp, T., Nieveen, N., Eds.; SLO: Enschede, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 113–139. [Google Scholar]
- De la Harpe, A.; Cronjé, J.C.; Rothman, W. A Framework for the Development and Improvement of Computational Thinking for High School Learners Using a Programming Language and Learner Management System. Ind. J. Teach. Learn. 2020, 15, 121–140. [Google Scholar]
- Terrazas-Arellanes, F.E.; Knox, C.; Strycker, L.A.; Walden, E.D. Online Learning Tools for Middle School Science: Lessons Learned from a Design-Based Research Project. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. (IJICTE) 2017, 13, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peters-Burton, E.E. STEM-Focused Elementary (eSTEM) School Components Rating Inventory. 2019. Available online: https://inclusivestemschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/eSTEM-components-inventory.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2022).
- Kaplan, S.A.; Garrett, K.E. The Use of Logic Models by Community-Based Initiatives. Eval. Prog. Plan. 2005, 28, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mertens, D.M.; Wilson, A.T. Program Evaluation Theory and Practice: A Comprehensive Guide, 2nd ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Dyehouse, M.; Bennet, D.; Harbor, J.; Childress, A.; Dark, M. A Comparison of Linear and Systems Thinking Approaches for Program Evaluation Illustrated using the Indiana Interdisciplinary GK-12. Eval. Prog. Plan. 2009, 32, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groff, J.S. Dynamic Systems Modeling in Educational System Design and Policy. J. New Approaches Educ. Res. 2013, 2, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Logic Model Development Guide; W.K. Kellogg Foundation: Battle Creek, MI, USA, 2004; Available online: https://wkkf.issuelab.org/resource/logic-model-development-guide.html (accessed on 26 May 2022).
- Bannan, B.; Peters, E.E.; Martinez, P. Mobile, inquiry-based learning and geological observation: An exploratory study. Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn. 2010, 2, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Greene, J.P.; McShane, M.Q. Learning from Failure: What Can Education Leaders, Advocates, and Policy Makers Learn from the Failures of Recent High-Profile School Reform Initiatives? Phi Delta Kappan 2018, 99, 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mania-Singer, J. Expressive Ties and the School Reform Efforts of an Urban School District. J. Educ. Lead. Policy Studies 2018, 2, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Rotermund, S.; Burke, A. Science and Engineering Indicators; National Science Foundation: Alexandria, VA, USA; National Science Board: Alexandria, VA, USA; National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics: Oakland, CA, USA, 2021. Available online: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20211/introduction (accessed on 23 May 2022).
- Bullock, E.C. Only STEM Can Save Us? Examining Race, Place, and STEM Education as Property. Educ. Studies 2017, 53, 628–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wieselmann, J.R.; Dare, E.A.; Ring-Whalen, E.A.; Roehrig, G.H. “I Just Do What the Boys Tell Me”: Exploring Small Group Student Interactions in an Integrated STEM Unit. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2020, 57, 112–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McKinney de Royston, M.; Madkins, T.C. A Question of Necessity or of Equity? Full-Service Community Schools and the (Mis)Education of Black Youth. J. Educ. Stud. Placed Risk 2019, 24, 244–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orfield, G.; Ee, J.; Frankenberg, E.; Siegel-Hawley, G. BROWN at 62: School Segregation by Race, Poverty, and State; Civil Rights Project, UCLA: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2016; Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ds6k0rd (accessed on 23 May 2022).
- Johnson, T.M.; Byrd, K.O.; Allison, E.R. The Impact of Integrated STEM Modeling on Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy for Integrated STEM Instruction: A Co-Teaching Approach. Sch. Sci. Math. 2021, 121, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shernoff, D.J.; Sinha, S.; Bressler, D.M.; Ginsburg, L. Assessing Teacher Education and Professional Development Needs for the Implementation of Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2017, 4, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
School Purpose and Process | |
---|---|
Inclusive STEM mission |
|
Climateof intellectual safety |
|
Evidence-based improvement |
|
Distributed leadership |
|
Community Relationships | |
Community engagement in STEM |
|
Supporting STEM partnerships |
|
School Staff | |
Teachers develop and refine core curricula |
|
Teachers as STEM educators |
|
Dedicated STEM staff |
|
School STEM Resources | |
Technology used to support STEM |
|
School physical setting |
|
STEM Program | |
Interdisciplinary STEM lessons |
|
Participation in STEM practices |
|
Widespread use of design cycle |
|
21st century skills used for STEM learning |
|
High-level STEM content |
|
Student ownership of learning |
|
Pillar | Description (Community School Playbook, 2021) |
---|---|
Integrated student supports | A dedicated staff member coordinates support programs to address out-of-school learning barriers for students and families. Mental and physical health services support student success. |
Expanded and enriched time and opportunities | Enrichment activities emphasize real-world learning and community problem solving. After-school, weekend, and summer programs provide academic instruction and individualized support. |
Active family and community engagement | Schools function as neighborhood hubs. There are educational opportunities for adults, and family members can share their stories and serve as equal partners in promoting student success. |
Collaborative leadership and practices | Parents, students, teachers, principals, and community partners build a culture of professional learning, collective trust, and shared responsibility through site-based leadership teams and teacher learning communities. |
School Purpose and Process | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following statements refer to Climate of Intellectual Safety. Please consider the following definition when rating the statements below. The school has a prominent theme of inclusive STEM learning that serves to organize the school design and decision making. The school’s mission is to serve a diverse student body with the expectation that all students can be successful STEM learners. To accomplish this, the school has some liberty (which varies over time) within the district to provide a STEM focus unique from other elementary schools. | |||||
This school has the following components… | Strongly Disagree (1) | Disagree (2) | Don’t Know (3) | Agree (4) | Strongly Agree (5) |
| |||||
| |||||
Comments regarding Climate of Intellectual Safety component: |
School | Year Established | Location | Grade | Example Distinction of Exemplary |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brentwood Magnet Elementary School of Engineering | 1957 (became STEM in 2008) | Raleigh NC | PK-5 | North Carolina STEM Model School of Distinction (2016) |
Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School | 2008 | St. Petersburg FL | K-5 | Magnet Schools of America Award of Merit (2007) |
Summit Road STEM Elementary | 2011 | Reynoldsburg OH | K-4 | National Blue Ribbon School Distinction (2016) |
Walter Bracken STEAM Academy | 1961 (became STEAM in 2009) | Las Vegas NV | PK-5 | Five-star rating on the Nevada School Performance Framework (since 2010) |
Weaver Lake Elementary | 1991 (became STEM in 2004) | Maple Grove MN | PK-5 | FETC STEM Excellence Award (2015) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Peters-Burton, E.; Provinzano, K.; Koskey, K.L.K.; May, T. Integrating beyond Content: A Framework for Infusing Elementary STEM-Focused Schools Components into Full-Service Community Schools. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080511
Peters-Burton E, Provinzano K, Koskey KLK, May T. Integrating beyond Content: A Framework for Infusing Elementary STEM-Focused Schools Components into Full-Service Community Schools. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(8):511. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080511
Chicago/Turabian StylePeters-Burton, Erin, Kathleen Provinzano, Kristin L. K. Koskey, and Toni May. 2022. "Integrating beyond Content: A Framework for Infusing Elementary STEM-Focused Schools Components into Full-Service Community Schools" Education Sciences 12, no. 8: 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080511
APA StylePeters-Burton, E., Provinzano, K., Koskey, K. L. K., & May, T. (2022). Integrating beyond Content: A Framework for Infusing Elementary STEM-Focused Schools Components into Full-Service Community Schools. Education Sciences, 12(8), 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080511