COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of the Social Media Technology on Higher Education
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
- (a)
- POFEN letter to the Ministers of (i) Education, Culture, Sports, and Youth, (ii) Health, (iii) Foreign Affairs, (iv) Finance, and (v) Transport, Communications, and Works. The letter was also send to the Chair and Members of the Educational Committee of the House of Representatives, and Universities.
- (b)
- POFEN arranged Video Conference with the Minister of Education, Culture, Sports and Youth.
2.1. Cyprus Rectors’ Conference
- (a)
- On 19 March 2020, the CRC convened via videoconference to discuss the impact of COVID-19 on higher education in Cyprus and to agree on a shared set of actions and a framework for their joint response to the situation. The CRC unanimously passed a Resolution [138], which was then forwarded to the Cyprus Agency for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Higher Education and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Youth. The Resolution emphasized the following:
- “The Rectors’ Conference welcomes the full compliance of the Higher Education Institutions with all emergency measures decided upon and stipulated by the Republic of Cyprus in order to address the dangers posed by the coronavirus pandemic to society and the economy.
- It is the unwavering intention of the Universities to complete, without delay, the current spring semester 2020, in accordance with each University’s academic calendar 2019–2020, as announced to students at the beginning of the academic year. The Universities, through the Rectors’ Conference, reassure their students once more, that their academic path and professional trajectory, along with ensuring their health and safety, are their highest priority.
- At the same time, the Universities have responded to the need to continue reliably providing high quality undergraduate and postgraduate Higher Education, by adopting and implementing the distance learning mode of delivery for each Programme of Study, utilizing online and digital tools and techniques. The high quality of education offered by universities in Cyprus continues to be assured, with the active support and constructive contribution of the Cyprus Agency of Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Higher Education (CYQAA).”
- (b)
- On 30 March 2020, the CRC held a videoconference meeting with the Chair of the Cyprus Agency for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Higher Education to inform the Agency about the universities’ efforts to combat the pandemic, as well as conversations at the CRC and at the universities about the completion of the Spring 2020 semester and the use of alternative assessment methods. The Chair expressed the Agency’s complete support and pledged to provide a quality assurance framework for alternative assessment methodologies.
- (c)
- There was a videoconference between CRC and the Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, and Youth on 13 April 2020, to discuss related issues and seek the Minister’s cooperation.
- (d)
- On 5 May 2020, the CRC held a videoconference meeting with the Board of the Cyprus Agency for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Higher Education and the Chair of the Parliamentary Committee on Education and Culture to discuss connected concerns and seek Parliamentary support.
2.2. Cyprus Agency of Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Higher Education
3. Methodology
3.1. Sample
3.2. Qualitative Research Method
3.3. Research Questions
3.4. Research Tool
3.5. Data Analysis
3.6. Interview Structure
4. Results, Analysis, and Discussion
4.1. Demographic Analysis
4.2. Social Media as a Teaching and Learning Tool
4.3. Discussion
4.4. Social Media Enhancing Teaching and Learning
4.5. Social Media Motivating and Supporting Students
4.6. Social Media Developing Community Connection
4.7. Main Barriers/Recommendations for the Use of Social Media
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lenhart, A.; Purcell, K.; Smith, A.; Zickuhr, K. Social Media Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults; Pew Internet American Life Project: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Vandeyar, T. The Academic Turn: Social Media in Higher Education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2020, 25, 5617–5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siakalli, M.; Masouras, A.; Papademetriou, C. Understanding Online News: Uses and Gratifications of Mainstream News Sites and Social Media. Int. J. Strateg. Innov. Mark. 2015, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siakalli, M.; Masouras, A.; Papademetriou, C. Uses and Gratifications in Online News: Comparing Social Media and Online News Media Use by Users. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Quantitative and Qualitative Methodologies in the Economic and Administrative Sciences, Athens, Greece, 21–22 May 2015; pp. 317–325. [Google Scholar]
- Tawafak, R.M.; AlFarsi, G.; Jabbar, J.; Malik, S.I.; Mathew, R.; AlSidiri, A.; Shakir, M.; Romli, A. Impact of Technologies During COVID-19 Pandemic for Improving Bahaviour Intention to Use E-learning. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 2021, 15, 184–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zincir, O. Knowledge workers’ social media usage as a personal knowledge management tool. In Harnessing Social Media as a Knowledge Management Tool; Chugh, R., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joosten, T. Social Media for Educators: Strategies and Best Practices; Jossey-Bass: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kietzmann, J.H.; Hermkens, K.; McCarthy, I.P.; Silvestre, B.S. Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Bus. Horiz. 2011, 53, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dulek, B.; Saydan, R. The Impact of Social Media Advertisement Awareness on Brand Awareness, Brand Image, Brand Attitude and Brand Loyalty: A Research on University Students. Int. J. Contemp. Econ. Adm. Sci. 2019, 9, 470–494. [Google Scholar]
- Souravlas, S.; Anastasiadou, S. Pipelined Dynamic Scheduling of Big Data Streams. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souravlas, S.; Katsavounis, S.; Anastasiadou, S. On Modeling and Simulation of Resource Allocation Policies in Cloud Computing Using Coloblack Petri Nets. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souravlas, S.; Anastasiadou, S.; Katsavounis, S. More on Pipelined Dynamic Scheduling of Big Data Streams. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosseck, G.; Bran, R. Script towards Research 2.0: The Influence of Digital and Online Tools in Academic Research. World J. Educ. Technol. Curr. Issues 2016, 8, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, A.M.; Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus. Horiz. 2010, 53, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutikno, T.; Handayani, L.; Stiawan, D.; Riyadi, M.A.; Subroto, I.M.I. WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram: Which is the Best for Instant Messaging? Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (IJECE) 2016, 6, 909–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balakrishnan, V.; Gan, C.L. Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telemat. Inform. 2016, 33, 808–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chugh, R.; Joshi, M. Challenges of knowledge management amidst rapidly evolving tools of social media. In Harnessing Social Media as a Knowledge Management Tool; Chugh, R., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 299–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellavista, P.; Foschini, L.; Ghiselli, N. Analysis of Growth Strategies in Social Media: The Instagram Use Case. 2019. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336336530_Analysis_of_Growth_Strategies_in_Social_Media_The_Instagram_Use_Case#fullTextFileContentshor (accessed on 3 September 2009).
- Rehm, M.; Manca, S.; Brandon, D.L.; Greenhow, C. Beyond disciplinary boundaries: Mapping educational science in the discourse on social media. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2019, 121, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackhow, C.; Galvin, S.; Brandon, D.; Askari, E. A decade of research on K-12 teaching and teacher learning with social media: Insights on the state-of-the-field. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2020, 122, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
- Jiao, Y.; Gao, J.; Yang, J. Social value and content value in social media: Two ways to flow. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 2015, 3, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gupta, A. Scope and implications of social media in the context of higher education: Review of researches. MIER J. Educ. Stud. Trends Pract. 2014, 4, 231–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tess, P.A. The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—A literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013, 29, A60–A68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, O.C. Social Media as learning tool in higher education: The case of Mexico and South Korea. Rev. Electron. Sin. 2015, 44, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Blackhow, C.; Galvin, S. Teaching with Social Media: Evidence-based Strategies for Making Remote Higher Education Less Remote. Inf. Learn. Sci. 2020, 121, 513–524. [Google Scholar]
- McKibbin, W.J.; Fernando, R. The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios. Asian Econ. Pap. 2020, 20, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issa, T.; Sulaiman Ghazi, B.; Ibrahim Al-Oqily, A.; Baltaci Goktalay, S.; Köse, U.; Issa, T.; Salih, B.A.; Almufaraj, W.K. Use of social networking in the Middle East: Student perspectives in higher education. Heliyon 2019, 7, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Hwang, Y.S.; Hwang, H.S. Utilising social networking services as a collective medium to support design communication in team collaboration. Archnet-IJAR 2020, 14, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, J.A.; Goel, A. Feature-based analysis of social networking and collaboration in MOOC. Int. J. Dist Educ. Technol. 2020, 18, 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J.; Aznar-Díaz, I.; Cáceres-Reche, M.-P.; Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. Use of social networks for international collaboration among medical students. Educ. Méd. 2020, 21, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirci, N.; Pisanski Peterlin, A. Face-to-face and Wiki revision in translator training: Exploring the advantages of two modes of collaboration. Interpret. Transl. Train. (ITT) 2020, 14, 38–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issa, T. e-Assessments via Wiki and Blog Tools: Students’ Perspective. In Educational Networking; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; ISBN 978-3-030-29972-9. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.; Cao, J.; Lin, W. Social network influence analysis. In Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Dependable Systems and Their Applications (DSA), Harbin, China, 3–6 January 2019; pp. 517–518. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, J.; Newby, T.J. Some Preservice teachers’ Web 2.0 experiences and perceptions on Web 2.0 as a personal learning environment. J. Comput. High. Educ. 2020, 32, 234–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gikas, J.; Grant, M.M. Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones social media. Internet High. Educ. Mob. 2013, 19, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eriksson, M.; Larsson, E. Facebook as a Tool for Building Customer Relationships in the Hospitality Industry: A Quantitative Study on the Effects of Facebook Activities on Relationship Drivers and Relational Benefits. 2014. Available online: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:733323/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2020).
- Cvijikj, I.P.; Michahelles, F. Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 2013, 3, 843–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, M.B.; Mansfield, P. Facebook as a complaint mechanism: An investigation of millennials. J. Behav. Stud. Bus. 2011, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Ellison, N.B.; Steinfield, C.; Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 2019, 12, 1143–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Manca, S.; Ranieri, M. “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: Social Media in academic practices. Internet High. Educ. 2016, 29, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCracken, H. The Three Immutable Laws of Online Privacy. PC World 2008, 8, 13. [Google Scholar]
- Paul, J.A.; Baker, H.M.; Cochran, J.D. Effect of online social networking on student academic performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 2117–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orús, C.; Barles, M.J.; Belanche, D.; Casalo, L.; Fraj, E.; Gurrea, R. The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Comput. Educ. 2016, 95, 254–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gür, D.; Kılıç Türel, Y. Parenting in the digital age: Attitudes, controls and limitations regarding children’s use of ICT. Comput. Educ. 2022, 183, 104504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parameswaran, M.; Whinston, A.B. Social Computing: An Overview. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2007, 19, 762–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anastasiadou, S.; Dimitriadou, C. What does Critical Thinking mean? A statistical data analysis of pre-service teachers’ defining statements. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. (IJHSS) 2011, 1, 73–83. [Google Scholar]
- Anastasiadis, L. Emotional Intelligence Influences on Consumers Consumer Behavior. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Compet. IJEIC 2019, 2. Available online: https://hephaestus.nup.ac.cy/bitstream/handle/11728/11527/article1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 1 March 2022).
- Anastasiadis, L.; Christoforidis, C. Evaluating citizens’ actual perceptions and expectations and assessing e-Service Quality Gap in Public Sector related to e-Government Services. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Compet. IJEIC 2019, 1. Available online: http://hephaestus.nup.ac.cy/bitstream/handle/11728/11395/Paper5.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 24 February 2022).
- Selwyn, N. Social Media in Higher Education. Eur. World Learn. 2012, 1, 1–10. Available online: http://sites.jmu.edu/flippEDout/files/2013/04/sample-essay-selwyn.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2022).
- Hamid, S.; Chang, S.; Kurnia, S. Identifying the use of online social networking in higher education. In Proceedings of the ASCILITE, Auckland, New Zealand, 6–10 December 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sobaih, A.E.; Moustafa, M. Speaking the same language: The value of social networking sites for hospitality and tourism higher education in Egypt. J. Hosp. Tour. Educ. 2016, 28, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyson, B.; Vickers, K.; Turtle, J.; Cowan, S. Evaluating the use of Facebook to increase student engagement and understanding in lecture-based classes. High. Educ. 2015, 69, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, C., III; Deil-Amen, R.; Rios-Aguilar, C.; Gonzalez Canche, M.S. Social Media in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Research Directions; The Centre for the Study of Higher Education at the University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University: Claremont, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hung, H.T.; Yuen, S.C.Y. Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teach. High. Educ. 2010, 15, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCarroll, N.; Curran, K. Social networking in education. Int. J. Innov. Digit. Econ. 2013, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, W.H.; Hao, Y.M.; Cao, Y.H.; Li, L. A Cloud-Based Real-Time Mobile Collaboration Wiki System. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 441, 928–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlenkrich, L.; Sewry, D. Factors for successful use of social networking sites in higher education. S. Afr. Comput. J. 2012, 49, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobaih, A.E.E.; Moustafa, M.A.; Ghandforoush, P.; Khan, M. To use or not to use? Social media in higher education in developing countries. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 58, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackhow, C.; Galvin, S.; Staudt Willet, K.B. What should be the role of social media in education? Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 2019, 6, 178–185. [Google Scholar]
- Andersson, A.; Hatakka, M.; Grönlund, Å.; Wiklund, M. Reclaiming the students–coping with social media in 1:1 schools. Learn. Media Technol. 2014, 39, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres-Ramírez, M.; García-Domingo, B.; Aguilera, J.; Casa, D.L. Video-sharing educational tool applied to the teaching in renewable energy subjects. Comput. Educ. 2014, 73, 160–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Everson, M.; Gundlach, E.; Miller, J. Social media and the introductory statistics course. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013, 29, A69–A81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duncan, I.; Yarwood-Ross, L.; Haigh, C. YouTube as a source of clinical skills education. Nurse Educ. Today 2013, 33, 1576–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, J. Writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and selfassessment modules. Radiographics 2006, 26, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- West, K.; Williamson, J. Wikipedia: Friend or foe? Ref. Serv. Rev. 2009, 37, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artal-Sevil, J.S.; Romero-Pascual, E.; Artacho-Terrer, J.M. Blended-learning: New trends and experiences in higher education. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain, 18–20 November 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Alebaikan, R.; Troudi, S. Blended learning in saudi universities: Challenges and perspectives. ALT-J. 2010, 18, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiadou, S.; Anastasiadis, L.; Angeletos, T.; Vandikas, J. A Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of Students’ Attitudes toward Physics. Int. J. Divers. Organ. Communities Nations 2010, 6, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, A.; Toon, I.; Wynn-William, K.; Beatson, N. Using ‘nudges’ to encourage student engagement: An exploratory study from the UK and New Zealand. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2017, 15, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Korr, J.; Derwin, E.B.; Blacke, K.; Sokoloff, W. Transitioning an adult-serving university to a blended learning model. J. Contin. High. Educ. 2012, 60, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Au, M.; Lam, J.; Chan, R. Social media education: Barriers and critical issues. In Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 1999–2050. [Google Scholar]
- Brew, L.; Cervantes, J.M.; Shepard, D. Millennial counselors and the ethical use of Facebook. Prof. Couns. 2013, 3, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boyd, D.M.; Ellison, N.B. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 2007, 13, 210–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moran, M.; Seaman, J.; Tinti-Kane, H. Teaching, Learning, and Sharing: How Today’s Higher Education Faculty Use Social Media; Research Report; Pearsons Learning Solutions, and Babson Survey Research Group: Boston, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Mendez, J.P.; Le, K.; De La Cruz, J. Integrating Facebook in the classroom: Pedagogical dilemmas. J. Instr. Pedagog. 2014, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, J.V.; Roberts, M.C. Critical incidents in the marriage of psychology and technology: A discussion of potential ethical issues in practice, education, and policy. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 2011, 42, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.-C. Linking learning styles and learning on mobile Facebook. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 2015, 16, 94–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hope, A. Educational heterotopia and students’ use of Facebook. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2016, 32, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiadou, S.; Anastasiadis, L. Reliability and validity testing of a new scale for monitoring attitudes toward electronics and electrical constructions subject. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. (IJAST) 2011, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Anastasiadou, S.D.; Anastasiadis, L.; Vandikas, I.; Angeletos, T. Implicative Statistical Analysis and Principal Components Analysis in Recording Students’ Attitudes to Electronics and Electrical Construction Subjects. Int. J. Technol. Knowl. Soc. 2011, 7, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazer, J.P.; Murphy, R.E.; Simonds, C.J. I’ll See You On “Facebook”: The Effects of ComputerMediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on Student Motivation, Affective Learning, and Classroom Climate. Commun. Educ. 2007, 56, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, C. Social Media Use: How Much Is Too Much? Millennial Marketing. Available online: http://millennialmarketing.com/2011/01/social-mediause-how-much-is-too-much/ (accessed on 25 October 2011).
- Harran, M.; Olamijulo, C. Social media communication spaces to develop literacies in a higher education language classroom context. S. Afr. J. High. Educ. 2014, 28, 410–435. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, S.D.; Magro, M.J.; Sharp, J.H. Exploring educational and cultural adaptation through social networking sites. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 2011, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, G.Y. Anonymous Versus Identified Peer Assessment via a Facebook-Based Learning Application: Effects On Quality of Peer Feedback, Perceived Learning, Perceived Fairness, And Attitude Toward The System. Comput. Educ. 2018, 116, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sequeira, A.H. Introduction to Concepts of Teaching and Learning. 2017. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272620585_INTRODUCTION_TO_CONCEPTS_OF_TEACHING_AND_LEARNING (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- Sequeira, A.H.; Mohammed, A.; Kumar, S.; Maina Saleh, B.; Shuaibu, A. E-Learning: A Tool for Enhancing Teaching and Learning in Educational Institutes. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2017, 8, 217–221. [Google Scholar]
- Sigala, M. Integrating Web 2.0 in e-learning environments: A socio-technical approach. Int. J. Knowl. Learn. 2007, 3, 628–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reece, I.; Walker, S. Teaching, Training and Learning; Business Education Publishers: Spring, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Celik, I.; Goknur Kaplan, A.; Tayfun Can, O. Social Media for Academics: Motivation Killer or Booster? In Proceedings of the IEEE 14th International Conference Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Athens, Greece, 7–10 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ferding, R.E.; Trammell, K.D. Content delivery in the ‘blogosphere’. Technol. Horiz. Educ. 2004, 31, 12–20. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2000, 25, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, K.; Williams, C. Five key ingblackients for improving motivation. Res. High. Educ. J. 2011, 11. Available online: http://aabri.com/manuscripts/11834.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Zepke, N.; Leach, L. Integration and adaptation: Approaches to the student retention and achievement puzzle. Act. Learn. High. Educ. 2005, 6, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ornstein, A.C. Motivation and learning. High Sch. J. 1994, 78, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
- Worley, K. Educating college students of the net generation. Adult Learn. 2011, 22, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brave, S.; Nass, C. Emotion in human-computer interaction. In The Human Computer Interaction Hand-Book: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 77–92. [Google Scholar]
- Honig, M.I.; Kahne, J.; McLaughlin, M.W. School-community connections: Strengthening opportunity to learn and opportunity to teach. In Richardson ed Handbook of Research on Teaching, 4th ed.; Aera: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Engestrom, Y. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theory reconceptualization. J. Educ. Work. 2001, 14, 133–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panitsides, E.A.; Anastasiadou, S. Lifelong Learning Policy Agenda in the European Union: A bi-level analysis. Open Rev. Educ. Res. 2015, 2, 128–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, J.A.N.; Khan, N.A. Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learn. Environ. 2020, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, C. Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2012, 15, 127–136. [Google Scholar]
- Dillenbourg, P.; Fischer, F. Basics of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Z. Berufs Wirtsch. 2007, 22, 111–130. [Google Scholar]
- Daniel, E.A.; Isaac, E.N.; Janet, A.K. Influence of Facebook usage on employee productivity: A case of university of cape coast staff. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2017, 11, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dumpit, Z.D.; Fernandez, C.J. Analysis of the use of social media in higher education institutions (HEI’s) using the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2017, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.I.; Azeem, M.; Ahmed, M.; Yasin, M.A.; Ali, R. Impacts of Social Media on Student’s Academic Achievement: A Case of Higher Educational Institutions of Southern Punjab of Pakistan. Int. Trans. J. Eng. Manag. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2021, 12, 12A3S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkaseh, A.M.; Wong, K.W.; Fung, C.C. Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of social media for e-learning in Libyan higher education: A structural equation modeling analysis. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 2016, 6, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kukulska-Hulme, A. How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? Internet High. Educ. 2012, 15, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revythi, A.; Tselios, N. Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 24, 2341–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Naidu, E. After COVID-19—‘Nothing Will Be the Same’. University World News: Africa Edition. 2020. Available online: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200406094611664 (accessed on 10 March 2022).
- Zachos, G.; Paraskevopoulou-Kollia, E.-A.; Anagnostopoulos, I. Social Media Use in Higher Education: A Review. Educ. Sci. 2018, 5, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Machete, P. The use of Critical Thinking to Identify Fake News: A systematic Literature Review. In Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology, Proceedings of the Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, Skukuza, South Africa, 6–8 April 2020; LNCS 12067; Hattingh, M., Ed.; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paskih, D. Real or fake news: Who knows? J. Soc. Media Soc. 2018, 7, 252–273. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, R.K.; Graves, L. News You Don’t Believe: Audience Perspectives on Fake News; Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism: Oxford, UK, 2017; Available online: https:reutersinstite.politics.ox.ac.uk/ourresearch/news-you-don\T1\textquoterightt-beieveaudience-perspectives-fake-news (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Janetzko, D. Social bots and fake new as (not) seen from the viewpoint of digital education frameworks. MedienPädagogik Z. Theor. Prax. Medien. 2017, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jackson, S. How a Critical Thinker Uses the Web; Windsor Studies in Argumentation: Windsor, ON, Canada, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kanekar, A.; Sharma, M. COVID-19 and Mental Well-Being: Guidance on the Application of Behavior and Positive Well-Being Strategies. Healthcare 2020, 8, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, M.S.; Walter, E.E.; Swann, C. Sedentary Behavior and Risk of Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 242, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, B. Why Does Zoom Exhaust Toy? Science Has an Answer. Wall StrJ-Online Ed [Internet]. N.PAG-N.PAG. 2020. Available online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-does-zoom-exhaust-you-sciencehas-an-answer-11590600269 (accessed on 17 February 2021).
- Hawke, L.; O’Reilly, A.; Bardis, S.; Henderson, J. Youth Mental Health and Substance Use in the Context of COVID-19: A Rapid Response Multicomponent Program of Youth-Engaged Research and Action; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Sanders, T.; Parker, P.D.; del Pozo-Cruz, B.; Noetel, M.; Lonsdale, C. Type of screen time moderates effects on outcomes in 4013 children: Evidence from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Cao, C.; Kantor, E.D.; Ngyyen, L.H.; Zheng, X.; Park, Y.; Giavannucci, E.L.; Matthews, C.; Colditz, G.A.; Cao, Y. Trends in sedentary behavior among the US population, 2001–2016. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2019, 321, 1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namlu, A.G.; Ceyhan, E. Billgisayar Kaygisi Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerinde Bir Çalişma; Anadolu Üniversiteri Yayinlari: Eskişehir, Turkey, 2002; p. 1353. [Google Scholar]
- Bugün, I.; Yardimci, H.; Ertemel, S.; Öğün, A.M.; Dinçses, E. Üniversite Oğrencilerinin Bilgisayar Kullanımınailişkin Bilgi, Davranış ve Ilişkili Sağlık Sorunları; Marmara University School of Medicine Student Congress: İstanbul, Turkey, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero, N.D.; Vanderloo, L.M.; Rhodes, R.E.; Faulkner, G.; Sarah, A.; Moore, S.A.; Tremblay, M.S. Canadian children’s and youth’s adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A decision tree analysis. J. Sport Health Sci. 2020, 9, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Djik, J.A.G.M. The Network Society, Social Aspects of New Media; Sage: London, UK; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; New Delhi, India, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Cruz-Jens, F.; Vincente, M.R.; Bacao, F.; Oliveira, T. Teleducation related digital divide: An analysis for the EU-28. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 56, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrew, A.; Cattan, S.; Costa Dias, M.; Farquharson, C.; Kraftman, L.; Krutikova, S.; Phimister, A.; Sevilla, A. Inequalities in children’s experience of home learning during the COVID-19 lochdown in England. Fisc. Stud. 2020, 41, 653–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, M.; Pierrin, A. Nearly One-in-Five Teens Can’t Finish Their Homework Because of the Digital Divide. 2018. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/26/nearly-one-in-fiveteens-can\T1\textquoterighttalways-finishtheir-homework-because-of-the-digitaldivide (accessed on 4 March 2022).
- Auma, O.; Arhieng, O. Perxeption of teachers on effectiveness of online learning in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2000, 25, 19–28. Available online: https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosrjhss/papers/Vol.202520Issue6/Series-11/C2506111928.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2022).
- Frenette, M.; Franck, K.; Deng, Z. School closures and the online preparedness of children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Econ. Insights 2020, 103, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Mataka, T.; Mukurunge, T.; Bhila, T. Vitrual teaching and learning: A sad reality of the “haves” and “Haves”, the teacher;s voice in Zimbabwe during COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. All Res. Writ. 2020, 1, 8–14. [Google Scholar]
- Flack, C.; Walker, L.; Bickrstall, A.; Margetts, C. Socioeconomic Disparities in Australian Schooling during the COVID-19 Pandemic; Pivot Professional Learning: Melbourne, Australia, 2020; Available online: https://pivotpl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Pivot_Socioeconomic-disparities-in-Australian-schooling-during-COVID-19_1July2020.pdf (accessed on 11 March 2020).
- Putri, R.; Purwanto, A.; Pramono, R.; Asbari, M.; Wijayanti, L.; Hyun, C. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on line home learning An explorative study of primary schools in Indonesia. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 4809–4818. [Google Scholar]
- Foti, P. Research distance learning in Greek kindergarten schools during the pandemic of COVID-19: Possibilities, dilemmas, Limitations. Eur. J. Open Educ. E-Learn. Stud. 2020, 5, 19–40. [Google Scholar]
- Lestiyanawati, R. The Strategies and Problems Faced by Indonesian Teachers in Conducting e-learning during COVID-19 Outbreak. CLLiENT Cult. Lit. Linguist. Engl. Teach. 2020, 2, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CRC. Resolution by the Cyprus Rectors’ Conference. 2020. Available online: https://www.dipae.ac.cy/index.php/en/news-andevents/announcements/507-20-03-2020-psifisma-sinodou-pritaneon-en (accessed on 16 January 2022).
- CyAQAAHE. Switching to Online Learning. 2020. Available online: https://www.dipae.ac.cy/index.php/el/neaekdiloseis/anakoinoseis-el/498-10-03-2020-anavoli-episkepseon-distance-learning (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- CyAQAAHE. Recommended Tools for Online Learning. 2020. Available online: https://www.dipae.ac.cy/index.php/el/neaekdiloseis/anakoinoseis-el/501-17-03-2020-ergaleia-tilemathima (accessed on 13 April 2021).
- CyAQAAHE. Midterm Examinations. 2020. Available online: https://www.dipae.ac.cy/index.php/el/neaekdiloseis/anakoinoseis-el/502-19-03-2020-endiameses-k-telikes (accessed on 6 April 2021).
- CyAQAAHE. Quality Standards and Guidelines for Alternative Methods of Assessment. 2020. Available online: https://www.dipae.ac.cy/index.php/el/nea-ekdiloseis/anakoinoseis-el/511-31-03-2020-final-examskoronoios (accessed on 11 April 2021).
- Howe, K.R. Getting over the quantitative-qualitative debate. Am. J. Educ. 1992, 100, 236–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuman, H.; Presser, S. The open and closed question. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1979, 44, 692–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berg, B.L. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences; Allyn: Boston, MA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Catanzaro, M. Using qualitative analytical techniques. In Nursing: Research Theory and Practice; Woods, N.F., Catanzaro, M., Eds.; The CV Mosby Company: St. Louis, MO, USA, 1988; pp. 437–456. [Google Scholar]
- Downe-Wambolt, B. Content analysis: Method, applications and issues. Health Care Women Int. 1992, 13, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burnard, P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Educ. Today 1991, 11, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graneheim, U.H.; Lundman, B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measure to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ. Today 2004, 24, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bath, D.; Smith, C.; Stein, S.; Swann, R. Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2004, 23, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grodeka, K.; Wild, F. How to Use Social Software in Higher Education; Grodeka, K., Wild Kiesinger, B., Eds.; Wydawnicto Naukowe Akapit: Kraków, Poland, 2008; p. 6. Available online: http://www.icamp.eu/ (accessed on 13 October 2015).
- Ngamassi, L.; Ramakrishnan, T.; Rahman, S. Use of Social Media for Disaster Management: A Prescriptive Framework. J. Organ. End User Comput. 2016, 28, 122–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liburd, J.J.; Christensen, I.-M.F. Using Web 2.0 in Higher Tourism Education. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2013, 12, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caldwell, J.E. Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2007, 6, 9–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liburd, J.J. Tourism research 2.0. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 883–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keles, E. Use of Facebook for The Community Services Practices Course: Community of Inquiry as a Theoretical Framework. Comput. Educ. 2018, 116, 203–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kathuria, A. Importance of Social Media in Higher Education. Int. J. Acad. Res. Dev. 2017, 2, 297–299. [Google Scholar]
- Nicol, D.J.; McFarlane-Dick, D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud. High. Educ. 2006, 31, 199–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ernst, C.-P.H.; Pfeiffer, J.; RothLauf, F. Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations of Social Network Site Adoption; Working Papers in Information Systems and Business Administration; Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz: Mainz, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wodzicki, K.; Schwämmlein, E.; Moskaliuk, J. Actually, I Wanted to Learn: Study-Related knowledge exchange on social networking sites. Internet High. Educ. 2012, 15, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinze, A.; Procter, C. Online Communication and Information Technology Education. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 2006, 5, 235–249. [Google Scholar]
- Bowers-Campbell, J. Cyber ‘pokes’: Motivational antidote for developmental college readers. J. Coll. Read. Learn. 2008, 39, 74–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, L.; Gou, X.; Xi, J. SNS communication model applying in network education system. In International Workshop on Computer Science for Environmental Engineering and EcoInformatics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 159, pp. 195–200. [Google Scholar]
- Ukwishaka, M.C.; Aghaee, N. Using Social Media for Peer Interaction in Higher Education: Students’ Perception of Using Facebook to Support Peer Learning. In Proceedings of the 14th IADIS International Conference e-Learning, Virtual, 2–4 April 2020; ISBN 978-989-8704-17-7. [Google Scholar]
- Kraut, R.; Kiesler, S.; Boneva, B.; Cummings, J.; Helgeson, V.; Crawford, A. Internet paradox revisited. J. Soc. Issues 2002, 58, 49–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, R.; Vitak, J.; Easton, E.W.; Ellison, N. Examining social adjustment to college in the age of social media Factors influencing successful transitions and persistence. Comput. Educ. 2013, 67, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez, A.R.; Cortijo, V.; Javed, U. Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Comput. Educ. 2014, 70, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mason, R.; Rennie, F. E-Learning and Social Networking Handbook: Resources for Higher Education, 1st ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Bubas, G.; Coric, A.; Orehovacki, T. The integration of students’ artifacts created with Web 2.0 tools into Moodle, blog, wiki, e-portfolio and Ning. In Proceedings of the 34th International Convention, Opatija, Croatia, 23–27 May 2011; pp. 1084–1089. [Google Scholar]
- Anastasiadou, S.; Kofou, I. Incorporating Web 2.0 Tools into Greek Schools. Int. J. Technol. Learn. 2013, 20, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
- Ophus, J.D.; Abbitt, J.T. Exploring the potential perceptions of social networking systems in university courses. J. Online Learn. Teach. 2009, 5, 639–648. [Google Scholar]
- Blackhow, C.; Robelia, B.; Hughes, J.E. Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age. Educ. Res. 2009, 38, 246–259. [Google Scholar]
- Hajli, M.N.; Lin, X. Developing tourism education through social media. Tour. Plan. Dev. 2014, 11, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ali, S. Embracing the selfie craze: Exploring the possible use of instagram as a language mLearning tool. Issues Trends Educ. Technol. 2014, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cubeles, A.; Riu, D. The effective integration of ICTs in universities: The role of knowledge and academic experiences of professors. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 2018, 27, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tantalaki, N.; Souravlas, S.; Roumeliotis, M. A review on Big Data real-time stream processing and its scheduling techniques. Int. J. Parallel Emerg. Distrib. Syst. 2019, 35, 571–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tantalaki, N.; Souravlas, S.; Roumeliotis, M.; Katsavounis, S. Linear scheduling of big data streams on multiprocessor sets in the cloud. In IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 107–115. [Google Scholar]
- Tantalaki, N.; Souravlas, S.; Roumeliotis, M.; Katsavounis, S. Pipeline-Based Linear Scheduling of Big Data Streams in the Cloud. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 117182–117202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souravlas, S.; Anastasiadou, S.; Tantalaki, N.; Katsavounis, S. A Fair, Dynamic Load Balanced Task Distribution Strategy for Heterogeneous Cloud Platforms Based on Markov Process Modeling. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 26149–26162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souravlas, S. ProMo: A Probabilistic Model for Dynamic Load-Balanced Scheduling of Data Flows in Cloud Systems. Electronics 2019, 8, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Souravlas, S.; Katsavounis, S. Scheduling Fair Resource Allocation Policies for Cloud Computing through Flow Control. Electronics 2019, 8, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Academics | Students | ||
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 8 (80%) | 12 (60%) |
Female | 2 (20%) | 8 (40%) | |
Age | <30 | - | |
30–40 | 3 (30%) | ||
41–60 | 7 (70%) | ||
>60 | - | ||
Year of Study | 1st Year | 6 (30%) | |
2nd Year | 5 (25%) | ||
3rd Year | 1 (5%) | ||
4th Year | 8 (40%) | ||
Years of Distance Academic Experience | 1–3 | 4 (40%) | |
4–6 | 5 (50%) | ||
7–9 | - | ||
>9 | 1 (10%) | ||
Faculty | Economics-Administration and Computer Science | 2 (20%) | 4 (20%) |
Architecture and Engineering | 2 (20%) | 4 (20%) | |
Health Sciences | 2 (20%) | 4 (20%) | |
Social Sciences | 2 (20%) | 4 (20%) | |
Law | 2 (20%) | 4 (20%) | |
Devices Used to Connect in Social Media | Smart Phone | 10 (100%) | 20 (100%) |
IPad | 4 (40%) | 10 (50%) | |
Laptop | 5 (50%) | 10 (50%) | |
Desktop | 8 (80%) | 2 (10%) | |
Social Media Used | 8 (80%) | 18 (90%) | |
YouTube | 10 (100%) | 19 (95%) | |
Forums | 10 (100%) | 10 (50%) | |
Viber | 5 (50%) | 17 (85%) | |
- | 11 (55%) | ||
- | 3 (15%) | ||
The purpose of Using Social Media | Connecting with friends | 10 (100%) | 20 (100%) |
Connecting with family | 9 (90%) | 17 (85%) | |
Connecting with other colleagues and students | 10 (100%) | - | |
Connecting with other fellows and academics | - | 16 (80%) | |
For academic and learning Purposes | 10 (100%) | 20 (100%) | |
Updating with the local and global news | 10 (100%) | 16 (80%) | |
Demonstrating points of opinion | 8 (80%) | 7 (35%) | |
Doing market research | 2 (20%) | 19 (95%) |
Barriers | Recommendations |
---|---|
Large workload Time consuming | - Setting a strict program - Word count limit comments - Posting hours |
Difficulties in monitoring the vast information Time consuming | - Incorporate a Moodle system with a Wiki tool and an e-portfolio system |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Papademetriou, C.; Anastasiadou, S.; Konteos, G.; Papalexandris, S. COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of the Social Media Technology on Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040261
Papademetriou C, Anastasiadou S, Konteos G, Papalexandris S. COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of the Social Media Technology on Higher Education. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(4):261. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040261
Chicago/Turabian StylePapademetriou, Christos, Sofia Anastasiadou, George Konteos, and Stylianos Papalexandris. 2022. "COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of the Social Media Technology on Higher Education" Education Sciences 12, no. 4: 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040261
APA StylePapademetriou, C., Anastasiadou, S., Konteos, G., & Papalexandris, S. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of the Social Media Technology on Higher Education. Education Sciences, 12(4), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040261