Not in the Greater Good: Academic Capitalism and Faculty Labor in Higher Education
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Method
2.1. Selection Criteria
2.2. Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Instruction and Academic Capitalism
3.1.1. Decreasing Instructional Costs
Institutional Outcomes
Classroom Outcomes
3.2. Governance and Academic Capitalism
3.2.1. Expanding Administrative Control
3.2.2. Shrinking Faculty Presence
3.3. Work-Lives and Academic Capitalism
3.3.1. Increased Pressures, Decreased Control
3.3.2. Provisional Status, Conditional Professionalism
4. Discussion
Academic Capitalism and Faculty Labor
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Archibald, R.B.; Feldman, D.H. State higher education spending and the tax revolt. J. High. Educ. 2006, 77, 618–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kezar, A.; DePaola, T.; Scott, D.T. The Gig Academy: Mapping Labor in the Neoliberal University; JHU Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong, L. Barriers to Innovation and Change in Higher Education. TIAA-CREF Institute. Available online: www.academia.edu/9815901/Barriers_to_Innovation_and_Change_in_Higher_Education (accessed on 16 September 2022).
- Giroux, H. Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harv. Educ. Rev. 2002, 72, 425–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magolda, P.M. The Lives of Campus Custodians: Insights into Corporatization and Civic Disengagement in the Academy; Stylus Publishing, LLC: Sterling, VA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Slaughter, S.; Rhoades, G. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education; JHU Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Kezar, A.J. Obtaining integrity? Reviewing and examining the charter between higher education and society. Rev. High. Educ. 2004, 27, 429–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baltodano, M. Neoliberalism and the demise of public education: The corporatization of schools of education. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 2012, 25, 487–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, A. Perspectives on the university as a business: The corporate management structure, Neoliberalism and higher education. J. Crit. Educ. Policy Stud. 2017, 15, 108–135. [Google Scholar]
- Slaughter, S.; Rhoades, G. The academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime. In The Exchange University: Corporatization of Academic Culture; Chan, A.S., Fisher, D., Eds.; UBC Press: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2008; pp. 19–48. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Government Accountability Office. Contingent Workforce: Size, Characteristics, Compensation, and Work Experience of Adjunct and Other Non-Tenure-Track Faculty. Available online: www.gao.gov/assets/690/687871.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2022).
- Curtis, J.W.; Thornton, S. The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession, 2012–2013; American Association of University Professors: Washington, DC, USA. Available online: www.aaup.org/report/heres-news-annual-report-economic-status-profession-2012-13 (accessed on 16 September 2022).
- Kezar, A. Embracing Non-Tenure Track Faculty: Changing Campuses for the New Faculty Majority; Routledge: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- National Center for Educational Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational. Sciences. Available online: Nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d20/tables/dt20_306.10.asp (accessed on 19 September 2022).
- U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce. The Just-In-Time Professor: A Staff Report Summarizing eForum Responses on the Working Conditions of Contingent Faculty in Higher Education. Available online: Edlabor.house.gov/imo/media/doc/1.24.14-AdjunctEforumReport.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2022).
- Eagan, M.K.; Jaeger, A.J. Effects of exposure to part-time faculty on community college transfer. Res. High. Educ. 2009, 50, 168–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ehrenberg, R.G.; Zhang, L. Do tenured and tenure-track faculty matter? J. Human Res. 2005, 40, 647–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacoby, D. Effects of part-time faculty employment on community college graduation rates. J. High. Educ. 2006, 77, 1081–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaeger, A.J.; Eagan, M.K. Examining retention and contingent faculty use in a state system of public higher education. Educ. Policy 2011, 25, 507–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Jaeger, A.J.; Hinz, D. The effects of part-time faculty on first semester freshmen retention: A predictive model using logistic regression. J. Coll. Stud. Retent. Res. Theory Pract. 2008, 10, 265–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umbach, P.D. How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. Rev. High. Educ. 2007, 30, 91–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollenshead, C.; Waltman, J.; August, L.; Miller, J.; Smith, G.; Bell, A. Making the Best of Both Worlds: Findings from a National Institution-Level Survey on Non-Tenure-Track Faculty; The Center for the Education of Women: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Schrecker, E. The Lost Soul of Higher Education: Corporatization, the Assault on Academic Freedom, and the End of the American University; The New Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kezar, A.; Gehrke, S. Faculty composition in four-year institutions: The role of pressures, values, and organizational processes in academic decision-making. J. High. Educ. 2016, 87, 390–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giroux, H.A. Academic entrepreneurs: The corporate takeover of higher education. Tikkun 2005, 20, 18–28. [Google Scholar]
- State Higher Education Executive Officers, State Higher Education Finance (SHEF) Fiscal Year 2018. Available online: www.sheeo.org (accessed on 16 September 2022).
- Hsieh, H.F.; Shannon, S.E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 2005, 15, 1277–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, G.W.; Bernard, H.R. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 2003, 15, 85–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Bok, D. Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Monks, J. The relative earnings of contingent faculty in higher education. J. Labor Res. 2007, 28, 487–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- McNaughtan, J.; García, H.A.; Nehls, K. Understanding the growth of contingent faculty. New Dir. Inst. Res. 2017, 176, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, L. Flexibility at the core: What determines employment of part-time faculty in academia. Ind. Relat. 2013, 68, 312–339. [Google Scholar]
- Muzzin, L. How fares equity in an era of academic capitalism? The role of contingent faculty. In The Exchange University: Corporatization of Academic Culture; Chan, A.S., Fisher, D., Eds.; UBC Press: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2008; pp. 105–124. [Google Scholar]
- Jaeger, A.J.; Eagan, M.K., Jr. Unintended consequences: Examining the effect of part time faculty members on associate’s degree completion. Community Coll. Rev. 2009, 36, 167–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowden, R.; Gonzalez, L.P. The rise of contingent faculty: Its impact on the professoriate and higher education. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 2012, 4, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrell, S.E.; West, J.E. Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. J. Political Econ. 2010, 118, 409–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Xiaotao, F.; Di Xu, R. Does contractual form matter? The impact of different types of non-tenure-track faculty on college students’ academic outcomes. J. Hum. Res. 2019, 54, 1081–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudd, S.S.; Apgar, C.; Bronson, E.F.; Lee, R.G. Creating a campus culture of integrity: Comparing the perspectives of full-and part-time faculty. J. High. Educ. 2009, 80, 146–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meixner, C.; Kruck, S.E.; Madden, L.T. Inclusion of part-time faculty for the benefit of faculty and students. Coll. Teach. 2010, 58, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solomon, C.R. “Sacrificing at the altar of tenure”: Assistant professors’ work/life management. Soc. Sci. J. 2011, 48, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Campbell, D.; Mendoza, P. The relationship between the employment of part-time faculty and student degree and/or certificate completion in two-year community colleges. Community Coll. J. Res. Pract. 2015, 39, 986–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffmann, F.; Oreopoulos, P. Professor qualities and student achievement. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2009, 91, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Fike, D.S.; Fike, R. Predictors of first-year student retention in the community college. Community Coll. Rev. 2008, 36, 68–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ran, F.X.; Sanders, J. Instruction quality or working condition? The effects of part-time faculty on student academic outcomes in community college introductory courses. AERA Open 2020, 6, 2332858420901495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landrum, R.E. Are there instructional differences between full-time and part-time faculty? Coll. Teach. 2009, 57, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Cavanaugh, J.K. What did you get? A faculty grade comparison. Qual. Assur. Educ. 2006, 14, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lerner, G. Corporatizing higher education. Hist. Teach. 2008, 41, 219–227. [Google Scholar]
- Bowen, R.W.; Buck, J.L. College presidents are hard-working, talented, and vastly overpaid. Chron. High. Educ. 2004, 50. Available online: www.chronicle.com/article/college-presidents-are-hard-working-talented-and-vastly-overpaid/ (accessed on 21 November 2022).
- Fjortoft, N.; Winkler, S.R.; Mai, T. Pharmacy practice department chairs’ perspectives on part-time faculty members. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2012, 76, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Jones, W.A.; Hutchens, N.H.; Hulbert, A.; Lewis, W.D.; Brown, D.M. Shared governance among the new majority: Non-tenure track faculty eligibility for election to university faculty senates. Innov. High. Educ. 2017, 42, 505–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gehrke, S.J.; Kezar, A. Supporting non-tenure-track faculty at 4-year colleges and universities: A national study of deans’ values and decisions. Educ. Policy 2015, 29, 926–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levin, J.S. Faculty work: Tensions between educational and economic values. J. High. Educ. 2006, 77, 62–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kezar, A. Departmental cultures and non-tenure-track faculty: Willingness, capacity, and opportunity to perform at four-year institutions. J. High. Educ. 2013, 84, 153–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kezar, A. Examining non-tenure track faculty perceptions of how departmental policies and practices shape their performance and ability to create student learning at four-year institutions. Res. High. Educ. 2013, 54, 571–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brenner, D. Performative pedagogy: Resignifying teaching in the corporatized university. Rev. Educ. Pedagog. Cult. Stud. 2006, 28, 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyons, R.E.; Burnstad, H. Best Practices for Supporting Adjunct Faculty. Available online: Citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.464.6670&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 17 September 2022).
- Thirolf, K.Q. How faculty identity discourses of community college part-time faculty change over time. Community Coll. J. Res. Pract. 2013, 37, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gappa, J.M.; Austin, A.E.; Trice, A.G. Rethinking Faculty Work: Higher Education’s Strategic Imperative; Jossey-Bass Inc: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Kezar, A.; Lester, J. Supporting faculty grassroots leadership. Res. High. Educ. 2009, 50, 715–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kezar, A.; Sam, C. Governance as a catalyst for policy change: Creating a contingent faculty friendly academy. Educ. Policy 2014, 28, 425–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kezar, A.; Sam, C. Institutionalizing equitable policies and practices for contingent faculty. J. High. Educ. 2013, 84, 56–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, A.D. Corporatized Higher Education: A Quantitative Study Examining Faculty Motivation Using Self-Determination Theory. Ph.D. Thesis, Unpublished. University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Spinrad, M.L.; Relles, S.R. Losing our faculties: Contingent faculty in the corporate academy. Innov. High. Educ. 2022, 47, 837–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnett, R. Beyond All Reason: Living with Ideology in the University; Routledge: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Hao, Z. Commercialization and corporatization versus professorial roles and academic freedom in the United States and Greater China. Chin. Sociol. Rev. 2015, 47, 103–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Z. In search of a professional identity: Higher education in Macau and the academic role of faculty. High. Educ. 2016, 72, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winter, R. Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 2009, 31, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tierney, W.G.; Bensimon, E.M. Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe; SUNY Press: Albany, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Levin, J.S.; Hernandez, V.M. Divided identity: Part-time faculty in public colleges and universities. Rev. High. Educ. 2014, 37, 531–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levin, J.S.; Shaker, G.G. The hybrid and dualistic identity of full-time non-tenure track faculty. Am. Behav. Sci. 2011, 55, 1461–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kezar, A. Non-Tenure-Track Faculty’s Social Construction of a Supportive Work Environment. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2013, 115, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maxey, D.; Kezar, A. Revealing opportunities and obstacles for changing non-tenure-track faculty practices: An examination of stakeholders’ awareness of institutional contradictions. J. High. Educ. 2015, 86, 564–594. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, J.R. Administrator perspectives of advantages and challenges of employing part time faculty in nursing education programs: Two sides of the same coin. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2017, 38, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morphew, C.; Ward, K.; Wolf-Wendel, L. Contingent faculty composition and utilization: Perspectives from independent colleges and universities. New Dir. Inst. Res. 2017, 176, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moorehead, D.L. Department Chairs’ Perceptions of Part-Time Faculty Status in Maryland Public and Private Higher Education Institutions. Ph.D. Thesis, Unpublished. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Langen, J.M. Evaluation of adjunct faculty in higher education institutions. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2011, 36, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, J.H.; Braun, R.E.; McKinney, M.A.; Thompson, A. Perceptions of part-time faculty by chairpersons of undergraduate health education programs. Health Promot. Pract. 2011, 12, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maxey, D. The Delphi Project on the Changing Faculty and Student Success. J. Collect. Bargain. Acad. 2014, 0, 3. Available online: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/jcba/vol0/iss9/3 (accessed on 17 September 2022).
- Simien, E.M.; Wallace, S.J. Disproportionate service: Considering the impacts of George Floyd’s death and the coronavirus pandemic for women academics and faculty of color. PS Political Sci. Politics 2022, 55, 799–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bensimon, E.M. Reclaiming racial justice in equity. Chang. Mag. High. Learn. 2007, 50, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Spinrad, M.L.; Relles, S.R.; Watson, D.L. Not in the Greater Good: Academic Capitalism and Faculty Labor in Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120912
Spinrad ML, Relles SR, Watson DL. Not in the Greater Good: Academic Capitalism and Faculty Labor in Higher Education. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(12):912. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120912
Chicago/Turabian StyleSpinrad, Mark L., Stefani R. Relles, and Doris L. Watson. 2022. "Not in the Greater Good: Academic Capitalism and Faculty Labor in Higher Education" Education Sciences 12, no. 12: 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120912