University Students’ Experiences of the Use of Mlearning as a Training Resource for the Acquisition of Biomechanical Knowledge

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In bibliographic reference no. 40 must be corrected the year of publication.

Author Response

First of all, we would like to thank both the editor and the reviewers for their considerations which have helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript. We will now proceed to respond to every comment on a different colour. As requested, revisions made to the manuscript have been marked up using the “Track Changes” function.

Reviewer 1

Point 1:

In bibliographic reference no. 40 must be corrected the year of publication.

Thank you for your comment. The error in the date of the reference has already been corrected and was due to a typographical error

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The general quality of the article is very godd, and the topic is of current interest.

The research methodology is well designed.

The research hypotheses must be clearly formulated.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Response to reviewers

First of all, we would like to thank both the editor and the reviewers for their considerations which have helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript. We will now proceed to respond to every comment on a different colour. As requested, revisions made to the manuscript have been marked up using the “Track Changes” function.

Reviewer 2

Point 1:

The general quality of the article is very good, and the topic is of current interest.

The research methodology is well designed.

The research hypotheses must be clearly formulated.

Thank you for your comment. Following your indications, we have proceeded to include our hypothesis in the final part of the introduction section (lines 112-116)

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Line 70 - Remove telephone, and use smartphone

Line 84 use smartphones instead of mobile telephones (or at least, if you want to stress the concept that is mobile, use the term mobile phone).

The paper is well written, clear, and it tackles an issue very important, mostly in these times. I suggest the authors to add an explanation on the theoretical background of the questionnaire they adopted (described in the instruments section). Since it was created ad-hoc, an explanation of why the authors adopted the chosen questions, would benefit the overall understanding and the repeatability of the research work.

Author Response

First of all, we would like to thank both the editor and the reviewers for their considerations which have helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript. We will now proceed to respond to every comment on a different colour. As requested, revisions made to the manuscript have been marked up using the “Track Changes” function.

Reviewer 3

Point 1:

Line 70 - Remove telephone, and use smartphone

Line 84 use smartphones instead of mobile telephones (or at least, if you want to stress the concept that is mobile, use the term mobile phone).

Thank you for your indications. We have proceeded to make the changes according to your instructions

Point 2:

The paper is well written, clear, and it tackles an issue very important, mostly in these times. I suggest the authors to add an explanation on the theoretical background of the questionnaire they adopted (described in the instruments section). Since it was created ad-hoc, an explanation of why the authors adopted the chosen questions, would benefit the overall understanding and the repeatability of the research work.

We appreciate the reviewer’s comment. We agree that this is an interesting information to be provided in the manuscript. A more detailed background of the ad-hoc questionnaire used in the study has been included (lines 149-160).

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf