1. Introduction
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has a large workforce of migrant workers who account for the majority of employees in highly skilled positions. Due to the continuous growth of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, demand for a workforce trained in STEM is growing [
1]. This could lead to high youth unemployment rates among citizens in countries that exhibit the trend, as is currently happening in the United States [
2]. The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) has the world’s youngest population, with more than half of its people under the age of 25 [
3]. Meanwhile, the World Economic Forum [
4], reports that the MENA region has the world’s highest youth unemployment rate (27.2% in the Middle East and 29% in North Africa). This is partly due to a skills shortage, which is compounded each year by the influx of foreign workers [
5] dominating the private sector [
6].
The UAE currently has a youth unemployment rate of 7.34% [
7]. Unemployed Emirati youth have criticized the education system, particularly at the high school level, for failing to prepare them for the labor market [
8]. In 2019, the female unemployment rate in the emirate of Abu Dhabi was 23.8% among women aged 25 to 29. Across the UAE, female unemployment was significantly higher than male unemployment [
9]. According to [
10], the UAE government is working to reform the high school curriculum to prioritize STEM education [
10] to ensure that Emirati youth are equipped with the necessary skills to compete for jobs in STEM sectors upon graduation.
These goals are further evidenced by the process of Emiratization, a UAE Government initiative to place qualified Emirati men and women in government and private sector companies [
11]. Emiratization is particularly important for women, who benefit from government-sponsored gender equality programs [
12]. The importance of a STEM education is also highlighted in the UAE Vision [
13], a multi-year plan for developing the country’s economy.
In recent years, education officials in the UAE have prioritized education that prepares Emirati youth for jobs in the “aerospace, aviation, metallurgy, semiconductors, and nanotechnology” sectors [
14]. This is in line with the UAE’s National Agenda [
13], which aims to create a knowledge-based economy fostering research and innovation to bolster the country’s economic environment and boost its appeal to foreign investors. The UAE’s new commitment to STEM education is reflected in the high STEM enrolment rates at several of the country’s leading higher education institutions. Despite the belief that engineering is a male-dominated field [
15], women outnumber men in enrolment at the Higher Colleges of Technology, the University of Sharjah, and United Arab Emirates University [
16].
This study aims to better understand the challenging position of aspiring and working female engineers in the UAE and gather insights on the gender bias that impedes their career trajectory. For this purpose, a systematic review of eight articles and a subsequent applied analysis of the UAE context was developed. Below, we present data about the reality of women in STEM and their relationship with STEM education in the context of the UAE. Subsequently, we present the method and the results of the systematic review that support our analysis.
1.1. The Current STEM Landscape for Women in the UAE
The UAE, like many countries around the world [
17], is investing heavily to improve the education of women, particularly in STEM disciplines [
18]. The prominent and equal participation of women in STEM higher education courses, [
19], and later in the workforce, is viewed as key for the growth of Gulf State economies [
19], and the UAE, in particular, has positioned STEM subjects [
14] as essential for reforming the country’s economy from one based predominantly on oil to one of knowledge. Additionally, the UAE encourages girls to study STEM disciplines [
20] and pursue jobs traditionally dominated by men [
21]. Since 2010, the UAE has been working to reform its secondary education curriculum to incorporate more STEM courses [
22]. Today, even fathers motivate their daughters to study engineering [
23,
24], which would have been unthinkable a few decades ago.
One may argue that STEM fields are no longer considered male-only sectors in the UAE [
25], as girls are actively participating in school and university-level science and engineering courses, outperforming boys in most cases since the adaptation of STEM in government schools. Emirati women have persisted in STEM education and continue to outnumber their male peers despite social, psychological, and gender preconceptions, as well as cultural difficulties with women playing leadership roles [
23]. Nonetheless, while female participation in secondary and tertiary STEM education has increased in parallel with the UAE’s economic development goals, the workforce continues to skew male. What is more, the disconnect between women’s professional aspirations and their ability to find STEM-related jobs has not been adequately studied.
To fill this research gap, we aggregated studies from the UAE and other countries to explore the contextual challenges and opportunities for women pursuing careers in engineering and STEM fields. We gathered and analyzed secondary data on female engineering students at the Higher Colleges of Technology, the University of Sharjah, and United Arab Emirates University to determine whether the UAE provides suitable engineering employment opportunities for female graduates of engineering programs.
1.2. Women and STEM Representation in UAE Higher Education
1.2.1. Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT)
Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT) is the largest higher education institution of applied sciences in the UAE. HCT offers 13 undergraduate engineering, technology, and science majors in areas such as aviation, computing, construction, energy, governance, healthcare, infrastructure support and maintenance, manufacturing, oil and gas, and telecommunications [
26]. According to data from the 2019–2020 academic year (
Table 1), 93% of students enrolled at HCT were female [
26].
Although female students dominate all fields of study at HCT, male enrollment in engineering, technology, and science is slightly higher, with 55% of males participating in STEM disciplines (
Table 2).
1.2.2. United Arab Emirates University (UAEU)
United Arab Emirates University (UAEU) is the UAE’s flagship university, with comprehensive graduate and undergraduate programs in business and economics, education, engineering, food and agriculture, humanities and social sciences, information technology, law, medicine and health sciences, and science. All majors are fully accredited and of high quality [
28].
UAEU enrollment statistics for 2017–2018 [
27] show that women outnumbered men in engineering by more than 2:1 (
Table 3), and intake numbers from Fall 2020 show that women far outnumber men in STEM disciplines at UAEU [
28] (
Table 4).
1.2.3. University of Sharjah
The University of Sharjah is a regional and global leader in education [
29], scientific research, and the arts, with programs accredited by the UAE Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. Several programs, including engineering, communication, science, and business, have received international accreditation [
30]. In 2019–2020, women outnumbered men in engineering and STEM, as illustrated in
Table 5 [
31]. This was true in every college except Computing and Informatics.
Table 5.
University of Sharjah intake by college and gender 2019–2020 [
31].
Table 5.
University of Sharjah intake by college and gender 2019–2020 [
31].
College | Male | Female | Total |
---|
Shari’a and Islamic Studies | 66 | 47 | 113 |
Arts, Humanities, and Social Science | 231 | 437 | 688 |
Business Administration | 147 | 180 | 327 |
Engineering | 370 | 389 | 759 |
Health Sciences | 53 | 423 | 476 |
Law | 132 | 120 | 252 |
Fine Arts and Design | 8 | 131 | 139 |
Communication | 72 | 174 | 246 |
Medicine | 106 | 198 | 304 |
Dental Medicine | 55 | 160 | 215 |
Pharmacy | 36 | 143 | 179 |
Sciences | 26 | 146 | 172 |
Computing and Informatics | 156 | 146 | 302 |
No College Designated | 17 | 24 | 41 |
Total | 1475 | 2718 | 4193 |
2. Method
To categorize the contextual barriers and challenges preventing many female engineers in the UAE from pursuing careers in engineering, we conducted a qualitative desk research study. This systematic review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [
32] and PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews [
33]. The examined literature investigated the status of female engineers from different countries and applied the findings to the UAE. The included literature review focused on opportunities and challenges faced by women seeking employment in engineering fields. The study’s published protocol has an exhaustive list of cited reviews.
2.1. Eligibility Criteria
The systematic review included qualitative studies that (i) focused on female engineers and gender discrimination in engineering, (ii) examined employment opportunities for women in engineering, (iii) used qualitative approaches such as case studies, narratives, or phenomenology studies, (iv) looked at enrollment in higher education, including engineering and other STEM disciplines, (v) were published in English, (vi) focused on women engineers, and (vii) were published between 2012 and 2021. Eligibility criteria was determined through a detailed review of abstracts.
2.2. Data Source and Search Strategy
The systematic literature search was conducted in the following databases: EBSCOhost, ProQuest, Wiley Online Library, Gale, Taylor and Francis Online, SAGE Complete, and JSTOR. Iterative searches were performed using the following keywords: “Women in STEM”, “women engineers”, “gender disparity”, “discrimination”, and “gender stereotyping”. Boolean operators such as “and”, “or”, and “not” were also applied, as well as date range and language. The results were filtered to include only qualitative studies.
2.3. Study Selection
Citations were downloaded using Mendeley and then exported as RIS files to Rayyan, a free web- and mobile-based systematic review software [
34]. Rayyan improved the effectiveness of the search filtering and shortened the review period by accelerating the process of study selection. Abstracts of eligible articles were then evaluated to determine each paper’s suitability for inclusion. We used the “include” and “maybe” functions to specify justification for inclusion.
2.4. Data Extraction
The following information was collected from 168 pre-selected papers and included 8 final selected papers: country of study, study rationale, design, methods, sampling and participant characteristics, data analysis, and main findings.
2.5. Quality Appraisal
Selected studies were evaluated using the JBI Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. The checklist has 11 questions, and the inclusion criteria are scored as “yes”, “no”, “unclear”, or “not applicable” [
35].
2.6. Data Analysis
We identified recurring themes in the selected studies and produced a narrative synthesis of the findings. Sociodemographic characteristics and key findings are presented using a table and written descriptions.
3. Results
Figure 1 illustrates the article selection procedure and search results in detail. We retrieved 168 articles during the systematic review. Seven databases were consulted for literature searches: EBSCOhost (
n = 21), JSTOR (
n = 26), Taylor and Francis (
n = 34), ProQuest (
n = 18), Wiley Online Library (
n = 22), Gale (
n = 23), and SAGE Complete (
n = 24). Twenty-seven articles were selected for a full-text review. Articles based on mixed methods, meta-analysis, systematic reviews, and quantitative analysis were not included in our review. Each of the 171 abstracts were examined to assess the study design, technique, and method, and studies were excluded if they were non-qualitative. Eight papers were deemed suitable for our study.
3.1. Characteristics of Included Studies
We assigned nine characteristics to assess each study, including:
- (1)
Citations;
- (2)
Country of study;
- (3)
Rationale;
- (4)
Study design;
- (5)
Methods;
- (6)
Sampling and participant characteristics;
- (7)
Data analysis;
- (8)
Main findings;
- (9)
Study conclusion.
3.2. Participant Characteristics
In the included studies, information was collected from a total of 87 female engineers. The youngest participant was 21 years old [
36,
38]. The oldest participant was 45 years old [
41]. Ages were not specified in four of the studies [
39,
40,
42,
43].
5. Discussion and Conclusions
Through our qualitative desk research study, we found that although access to engineering and STEM education has improved for women in the UAE, the path to employment in a related field remains precarious for female STEM graduates. For women who do find work in STEM fields, few are made to feel welcome, as their contributions go unacknowledged. Many reported being sidelined or had trouble being promoted amid male antagonism. The situation in study countries is so bad that many women working in engineering and STEM have to accept male-dominated hostility as part of their profession or leave the profession altogether [
36]. To shift the male-dominated paradigm in engineering and STEM, we conclude that the onus lies on human resource departments to do more to recruit female engineers and women in STEM for senior positions. We also recommend diversity training in the workplace. There were certain limitations to our study. For example, it omitted quantitative and mixed-methods research in favor of focusing exclusively on qualitative data.
In conclusion, despite the high proportion of female engineers and STEM graduates in the UAE, workforce inclusion is not always assured. Further research is needed to strategize how to improve STEM employment opportunities for women and repair the “leaky pipeline” from the classroom to the job site [
48]. While solutions to various aspects of gender prejudice have been presented at the institutional, organizational, and individual levels, the evidence presented in this study demonstrates the persistence of gender bias in STEM. Given the dysfunctional symptoms connected with professional development, recruitment, and daily interactions with men in the workplace, gender equality in the STEM workplace demands a comprehensive transformation.