Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Efficiency of Insurance Companies in a Developing Country: A Data Envelopment Analysis Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Patterns of Intergenerational Educational (Im)Mobility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Financing for Renewable Energy: Examining the Impact of Sectoral Economy on Renewable Energy Consumption

1
School of Economic and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Godollo, Hungary
2
Department of Banking & Finance, College of Business and Economics, Wallaga University, Nekemte P.O. Box 395, Ethiopia
3
Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Business and Economics, Kotobe University of Education, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 5563, Ethiopia
4
School of Management and Business Administration, John von Neumann University, 6000 Kecskemét, Hungary
5
Circular Economy Analysis Center, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Godollo, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Economies 2024, 12(6), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12060127
Submission received: 10 April 2024 / Revised: 29 April 2024 / Accepted: 16 May 2024 / Published: 21 May 2024

Abstract

:
This study examines the effect of international financial flows, including investments and development assistance, on the expansion of renewable energy technologies. It also seeks to investigate the impact of the sectoral economy on the proportion of renewable energy consumption in Ethiopia. This study used an explanatory research design and a quantitative research approach. An autoregressive distributed lag model was applied to explore the long and short-term relationship among variables. A time series of data aggregated and disaggregated ranging from 2000 to 2022 was used. According to this study, sustainable finance programs are essential for advancing and aiding renewable energy projects in the long and short term. Ethiopia’s use of renewable energy will increase as sustainable finance rises. The main economic sectors determining Ethiopia’s consumption of renewable energy in the long and short term include the manufacturing, mining and service industries. This study’s findings imply that policies focusing on providing continuous financial support and fostering international cooperation to promote the development of the manufacturing sector are needed. This could include incentives for adopting renewable energy technologies and investing in renewable energy infrastructure. On the other hand, since the service and mining industries negatively impact renewable energy use, there is a need to diversify renewable energy sources beyond these sectors. This could involve promoting renewable energy projects in other sectors, such as manufacturing, agriculture, construction and trade. Based on the findings of this study, it is suggested that policymakers carefully consider the consequences within each economic sector when formulating decisions related to renewable energy. This study is novel in presenting empirical evidence linking renewable energy use to long- and short-term economic growth.

1. Introduction

Advancing sustainable development goals, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and fulfilling future energy demands have become a top concern worldwide, necessitating substantial financial commitments (Liu et al. 2021; Boston et al. 2021). As part of sustainable development goals, providing sustainable energy is a principal objective for many countries (Michaelowa et al. 2021). There is, however, the need to improve current financing levels and economic contributions to promoting sustainable energy (Clark et al. 2017). It is argued by Chan et al. (2019) that the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate Change Agreement need help to access enough funds. The Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement provide a roadmap for effective climate action (Chong 2018). However, they do not clearly define responsibilities or drive states to fulfill extraterritorial obligations. This issue is of considerable importance because the consumption of renewable energy sources in the sectoral economy depends on adequate financing. In this regard, many countries use different initiatives to increase funding for sustainable development goals and renewable energy projects. One of the initiatives that many developed countries mostly use to promote the transition to clean energy is through private investment mobilization. However, this initiative faces more significant constraints in developing countries.
Apart from the issue of private investment mobilization, there are also many constraint hindering the expansion of renewable energy expansion across developing countries. These constraints include the implementation of domestic policies about renewable energy, the accessibility of global public funding and the broader commercial landscape (Chen et al. 2021). Although the global expansion of renewable energy faces significant challenges, there are numerous economic sectors that heavily rely on the services provided by renewable energy sources. Many studies conducted across the globe show that a substantial amount of renewable energy consumption is attributed to different economic sectors, such as the banking sector, transportation, residential buildings and commercial services (Amuakwa-Mensah and Näsström 2022; Le et al. 2020; Doytch and Narayan 2021; Iskandarova et al. 2021; Maji and Adamu 2021). More specifically, some studies highlight the association between real GDP per capita and the utilization of renewable energy (Simionescu et al. 2020; Altunkaya and Özcan 2020; Iskandarova et al. 2021).
Within the specific context of Ethiopia, renewable energy sources, including solar, hydro, wind and geothermal, possess considerable capacity to stimulate economic expansion (Njoh 2021). Despite this potential, statistics reveal that 95 percent of total energy consumption in Ethiopia is derived from renewable sources. However, insights from a study conducted by Hailu and Kumsa (2021) underscore a significant challenge: a large part of Ethiopia’s population resides in areas with limited energy sources. This is a result of the proportion of the population that lives in urban and rural areas. The energy distribution in Ethiopian rural areas is still very limited, as the expansion of renewable energy in rural areas is more costly compared to that in urban areas. To support this argument, the study by Fu et al. (2024) suggests that deploying renewable energy constructions in rural compared to urban areas has different economic costs and benefits. This is mainly related to passive distribution networks that may no longer meet modern agricultural electrification and cleanliness requirements in rural areas, and this would necessitate urgent distributed energy planning in rural areas that could lead to high economic costs compared to urban areas. This has resulted in a distinctive scenario for the people of Ethiopia (Girma 2016).
Although Ethiopia has taken a leading role in climate policy among low-income nations, its progress in rural development remains challenged, as highlighted by Paul and Weinthal’s (2019) analysis. More specifically, renewable energy consumption has slowly decreased in recent years, and these potential energy sources have faced barriers to broader adoption. These challenges include a complex and restrictive financing scheme by the Renewable Energy Fund (REF) (Kotu 2012), the lack of a subsidy policy (Hailu and Kumsa 2021), insufficient institutional cooperation among stakeholders (Tiruye et al. 2021) and limited public awareness about renewable energy technologies (Hameer and Ejigu 2020). Hence, addressing these obstacles is important (Belay Kassa 2019) because renewable energy expansion can diminish carbon emissions and stimulate sustainable economic expansion in Ethiopia (Adinew 2020).
Despite numerous studies conducted to explore the challenges and potential of expanding renewable energy in Ethiopia, there has still been a significant reduction in renewable energy consumption. This reduction could be attributed to either an increase in demand or a decrease in supply. Therefore, further studies are needed to understand the factors behind the decline in renewable energy consumption. In doing so, the study at hand primarily focuses on the quantitative aspects of the economy, specifically examining the level of financial support provided for the expansion of renewable energy technologies that deliberately increase supply. Therefore, this study is motivated by the need to understand the sectoral economic factors contributing to the decline in Ethiopia’s renewable energy consumption and to explore the impact of international financial resources on renewable energy development in the country. Hence, this study investigates the effect of sustainable finance and the sectoral economy on Ethiopia’s renewable energy consumption. This study uses a benchmark from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization’s economic sector categorization system.
The industries used in this study as part of the sectoral economy are manufacturing, agriculture, construction, hunting, forestry, transportation, fishing, mining, utilities, wholesale and retail commerce, dining establishments, lodging, storage and communication. All economic sectors are measured by their value added to the economy as a proportion of the GDP. Additionally, the target variable of this study, sustainable finance, is measured by the annual international financial flows funded for supporting clean energy research and development. The dependent variable of this study, renewable energy consumption share, is calculated as the quantity of renewable energy utilized in the total energy supply for each year. Apart from the sectoral economic contribution, the research includes aggregate data on economic growth as a control variable. Based on this information, this study examines the relationship between each variable.
This study is novel in several ways. Initially, it fills a significant gap in the literature by exploring the relationship between sustainable finance, the sectoral economy and Ethiopia’s renewable energy consumption. Previous studies have not examined this relationship or provided empirical evidence. Additionally, this study uses a benchmark from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization’s sector categorization system to analyze various sectors’ contributions to Ethiopia’s economic decline in renewable energy consumption. Second, this study contributes to the existing knowledge on renewable energy utilization in Ethiopia by providing novel findings in these areas.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Sustainable Finance and Renewable Energy

Finance for renewable energy has recently become very popular to meet the growing global need for clean energy resources while minimizing environmental effects. More substantial investments in clean energy resources are needed (Qadir et al. 2021). However, there must be more clarity between the literature’s point of view on funding mechanisms and their importance. Most research in developed nations focuses on market-based policy tools, with few exploring the public and private sectors’ direct financial flows (Elie et al. 2021). Successful renewable energy financing innovation demands deeper comprehension of the correlation between various types of finance and investors’ willingness to make renewable energy investments (Apergis 2019).
Many countries like Poland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (Sovacool 2021; Le et al. 2020) have developed different platforms to finance renewable energy (Iskandarova et al. 2021). As per Kim (2020), Iskandarova et al. (2021) investigated the influence of these platforms on renewable energy. Studies by Tsao et al. (2021) and Bohland and Schwenen (2022) emphasized the temporal nature of subsidization and exposed disputes and tensions in funding, including coverage gaps and disputes among stakeholder groups. In addition to providing valuable insight into renewable energy distribution, innovation and policymaking (Donastorg et al. 2022; Dinçer et al. 2021), mobilizing financing for renewable energy in developing countries is necessary (Isah 2019). Recent attention has been directed toward renewable energy financing, owing to the imperative for heightened investment in clean energy to address global demand while mitigating environmental consequences (Qadir et al. 2021). In actuality, there is a difference in funding strategies.
Few studies have examined the public and private sectors’ role in directly financing market-based policies in developed and emerging nations (Vogeler 2019; Elie et al. 2021). As a result, these financing methods have received less attention in the global market because only some studies have examined this topic (Mullins and Walker 2009; James 2019; Apergis 2019). Another method to promote renewable energy finance is carefully considering pricing, capacity and financing policies when boosting renewable energy investments via institutions financing them (Tsao et al. 2021). Renewable energy funds have traditionally underperformed and lack market timing, implying low financial attractiveness (Elie et al. 2021). Several financing options have become available for renewable energy investments (Altunkaya and Özcan 2020; Packham 2021), including crowdfunding, green bonds and green loans. Studies have examined financing and subsidies in different countries, revealing shifts in funding patterns and an increase in the number of financial actors (Iskandarova et al. 2021). However, the consumption and expansion of renewable energy patterns have not yet been investigated. Based on this fact, this study develops the following hypothesis:
H1: 
Sustainable finance positively and significantly affects renewable energy consumption.

2.2. Sectoral Economy and Renewable Energy

Several studies have examined how sectoral economies influence renewable energy consumption. Amuakwa-Mensah and Näsström (2022) emphasize that the service sector is one factor that impacts renewable energy usage. The study’s findings imply that a robust banking system with a large bank size, high asset quality and high managerial efficiency consumes more energy than other economic sectors. Maji and Adamu (2021) conducted another study to examine the connection between renewable energy and manufacturing performance and their effect on the environment. The study’s conclusions suggest that renewable energy degrades the environment negatively and reduces ecological footprints (Usman et al. 2021), and manufacturing performance is affected asymmetrically by sectoral energy consumption (Adekoya et al. 2021).
In their study, Komarnicka and Murawska (2021) found that the transport sector exhibits the highest energy consumption, trailed by the industrial sector and households, thus resulting in elevated energy usage. According to Anton and Nucu (2020), financial development in the European Union, including the banking sector, the bond market and the capital market, contributes to a positive increase in renewable energy consumption. Commercial and public services are the sectors with the most minor consumption (Komarnicka and Murawska 2021; Adekoya et al. 2021; Zhong et al. 2021). Alternatively, foreign direct investment (FDI) generally decreases the consumption of non-renewable energy and augments the usage of renewable energy (Doytch and Narayan 2016). Using renewable energy in the US reduces carbon footprints but has a detrimental effect on environmental deterioration (Usman et al. 2021). International investment in renewable energy is constrained by the requirement for increased investment in renewable energy infrastructure and the substantial expenses associated with connecting to power grids (Ahmed et al. 2021; Rudkovskyy 2020). Romanian electricity systems have seen a significant rise in renewable energy-based generation capacity, resulting in lower usage of renewable energy (Jijie et al. 2021; Ciupageanu et al. 2021). Within developing nations, renewable energy consumption is influenced by the agricultural, industrial and energy sectors, whereas the service sector tends to diminish its usage (Mehedintu et al. 2021; Sarkodie 2021).
The funding of renewable energy efforts in Ethiopia is influenced by several problems, including the country’s anti-private business climate, a lack of technical expertise and a shortage of both competent people resources and financial resources (Simionescu et al. 2020; Njoh 2021). Environmental and institutional factors, encompassing political, economic, social, technological, ecological, cultural and historical dimensions, impact the nation’s utilization of renewable energy sources (Raikar and Adamson 2020). Ethiopia possesses untapped renewable energy resources, supported by indigenous knowledge and government dedication, which enable renewable energy production and consumption (Asratie 2021; Scarpellini et al. 2021). The renewable energy resources in Ethiopia, including solar, wind, hydropower and biomass, were investigated in a study titled “A Review of Renewable Energy Scenario in Ethiopia” by Tahiru et al. (2023). The study highlights Ethiopia’s considerable potential for renewable energy production, particularly emphasizing wind and hydropower resources. Ethiopian grid-connected solar PV systems are feasible, according to research by Kebede (2015), which focuses on the systems’ financial sustainability. Based on a financial feasibility analysis of various solar PV system sizes, Ethiopian power generation can find a cost-effective solution in solar energy.
Nevertheless, these studies cannot examine Ethiopia’s tendency to use renewable energy. The relationship between sustainability, the role of the private sector and the use of renewable energy sources cannot be examined concurrently by the research. Hence, this study is novel in providing fresh empirical evidence in favor of the variables’ link. In light of this fact, this study develops the following hypotheses. Additionally, the following Figure 1 of the study shows the conceptual framework used to develop the relationship between variables.
H2: 
The sectoral economy positively and significantly affects renewable energy consumption.
H3: 
Economic growth positively and significantly affects renewable energy consumption.

3. Methodology and Materials Used

This study examines the effect of Ethiopia’s sectoral economy on the percentage of renewable energy consumption using both aggregate and disaggregate time series data. Ethiopia is chosen as a case study due to its abundant renewable energy resources, with most of its energy derived from renewable sources. This selection aims to offer empirical evidence for countries relying on renewable energy sources.
This study uses an explanatory research design and a quantitative research approach to investigate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. Explanatory research design is used to understand the relationship between variables, making it a suitable choice for this investigation. To enable this research, the economic sectors are divided into six categories based on commonalities, using the categorization method supplied by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. This categorization is based on similar characters to simplify the research process. This classification aims to facilitate the study by grouping sectors with similar characteristics. This division is undertaken to facilitate this study by grouping sectors based on their common attributes. This particular categorization allows for a comprehensive examination of how each sector contributes to and influences Ethiopia’s overall consumption of renewable energy. Table 1 shows the sectoral economy used in this study.
Based on the categorization above, this research examines how the sectoral economy affects the proportion of renewable energy use. At the same time, it also attempts to look into the relationship between foreign finance flow supporting clean energy research and development and renewable energy production and renewable energy consumption. This research is entirely based on secondary data gathered from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) (Energy Statistics Database) and the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) for sectoral economic statistics spanning the period of 2000–2022. This period is selected based on data available for both renewable energy and sustainable finance.

3.1. Variables and Measurements Used

This study aims to investigate how financing and the sectoral economy affect the consumption of renewable energy share in Ethiopia. As a result, the following functional estimation is used to develop the model. All independent variables are measured as the annual value added to the economy as a percentage of GDP.
RE = f (GDP, FI, IS, MIS, CS, MAS, TS, SS).
RE = Renewable energy consumption share (measured as the percentage of renewable energy consumption from each year’s total energy supply).
GDP = Gross domestic product (the economy’s annual growth rate at the aggregate level).
FI = Financial assistance to support renewable energy investment (measured by annual international financial flows supporting clean energy research at the aggregate level).
AS (agricultural sector), MIS (mining sector), CS (construction sector), MAS (manufacturing sector), TS (trade sector), and SS (service sector). All are measured by their value added to the economy as a percentage of GDP.
The above functional form can be written in the econometric form as follows.
Here, β0 is the intercept. β1–β8 are coefficients of the independent variables, and c represents the error term of the study (variables that are not included in this study).

3.2. Model Specification

The first step in choosing the best research model is determining whether the variables are stationary over time. This can be performed through different methods, but this study employs a unit root test to identify the variable’s stationarity. This procedure entails assessing the variables’ characteristics over time to see if they have a stable mean and variance. The unit root test can assess whether the variables are stationary, which is essential for proper analysis and dependable results. As a consequence, the primary purpose of this first step is to investigate the variables’ stationarity using the unit root test. Table 2 shows the stationarity test results. The hypotheses guiding these tests are as follows: H0 posits the presence of a unit root in the variables, and the decision criterion involves rejecting H0 if the p-value (PV) is less than 0.05. On the other hand, H1 suggests the absence of a unit root in the variables.
As depicted in the provided table, Table 2 reveals the outcomes of the stationarity test conducted on the variables. These results indicate that the variables exhibit a consistent variance and mean over time. However, they display different levels of integration. Specifically, certain variables such as gross domestic product, financial assistance, the agricultural sector and the service sector are stationary at the level, indicating a stable pattern without significant fluctuations. On the other hand, variables like renewable energy, the mining sector, the construction sector, the manufacturing sector and the trade sectors exhibit stationarity at the first difference, implying that their values undergo consistent changes over time. Considering the overall stationarity result, it can be inferred that the variables possess different degrees of integration, characterized as I(0) and I(1). This signifies that some variables maintain a constant level, whereas others experience first-order integration, necessitating an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model for analysis.

3.3. Discussion of Model Used

The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model is the econometric technique used by this study’s researchers. The rationale for utilizing the ARDL model stems from the nature of the series under investigation, which exhibits a combination of integration orders, namely I(0) and I(1). The ARDL model allows researchers to adequately capture the dynamics of the variables under study.
Y t = µ o i + i = 1 p α j y t 1 + i = 1 q β j X t 1 + ε i t
The ARDL model estimates to test for cointegration among the variables.
Δ R E t = β 0 + β 1   R E t 1 + β 2 G D P t 1 + β 3 F I t 1 + β 4 A S t 1 + β 5 M I S t 1 + β 6 C S t 1 + β 7 M A S t 1 + β 8 T S t 1 + β 9 S S t 1 + a h λ 2   Δ   G D P   t a + b h λ 3 Δ F I t b + c h λ 4   Δ   A S t c + d h λ 5   Δ I M I S t d + e h λ 6   Δ C S t e + f h λ 7   Δ   M A S t f + g h λ 8   Δ T S t g + h h λ 9   Δ S S t h +   ε t
The formulation of the error correction model aims to illustrate the short-term associations among the variables.
Δ   R E t = β 0 + β 1   a h i R E t 1 + β 2   b h i G D P t 1 + β 3 c h i F I t 1 + β 4 d h i A S t 1 + β 5 e h i M I S t 1 + β 6 f h i   C S t 1 + g h λ 7   Δ   M A S t g + h h λ 8   Δ T S t h + i h λ 9   Δ S S t i + µ E C M   ( 1 ) ε t
The bounds-testing approach is applied (Pesaran and Taylor 1999), which is used to examine potential cointegration among variables. The results suggest cointegration, prompting an exploration of the short- and long-term relationship. The results of test statistics for the ARDL bounds test are presented below.
As indicated in Table 3, the ARDL bounds testing results suggest that the variables exhibit a long-term relationship, prompting further examination of their short-term dynamics. The F-statistics result indicates a value exceeding the threshold for I(0) and I(1), indicating a long-term relationship between the variables. This finding underscores the importance of exploring the short-term dynamics to understand the relationship between these variables fully.

3.4. Lag Selection Criteria

This study’s results indicate that the model needs a maximum lag order of one. This conclusion is consistent across all lag length selection criteria, reinforcing the validity of the result. Consequently, this study uses a single lag order when running the model. The following Table 4 of the study shows lag selection criteria used in the study.

4. Econometric Analysis and Discussion

Before conducting an econometric analysis, it is imperative to understand the data within the group thoroughly.
It is clear from Table 5’s descriptive statistics that the dependent variable, renewable energy, has a mean value of 92.71 percent. This suggests that renewable energy was consumed at about 92.7 percent during the period (2000 to 2021). In addition, the highest documented consumption rate occurred in 2000 at 95.5%, whereas the lowest was reported in 2021 at 89.5 percent. The significant difference between the highest and lowest scores highlights Ethiopia’s dramatic decline in its use of renewable energy. This shows that the country’s adoption and consumption of renewable energy sources have seen noticeable fluctuation.
This study’s independent variable, which focuses on financial aid given to stimulate renewable energy investment, has a mean value calculated to be USD 339.2 million. This shows that, on average, throughout the study period, about USD 339.2 million in financial aid was granted for investments in renewable energy. Notably, the most minor investment was just USD 0.33 million (in 2008), whereas the most significant investment totalled a massive USD 4237.38 million (in 2009). This wide range between the maximum and minimum values illustrates the significant disparity in the magnitude of financial support dedicated to renewable energy projects. There are varying levels of commitment and investment in promoting and fostering the development of renewable energy sources, with some instances demonstrating substantial financial backing, whereas others reflect relatively limited support. These data also show a clear relationship between the renewable energy consumption trend and the financing level. Figure 2 illustrates the exact association between the two factors.
The blue line in Figure 2 illustrates the pattern of funding support to encourage renewable energy investments in Ethiopia. The line exhibits many ups and downs, showing a wide range in the distribution of financial aid for promoting renewable energy projects. These fluctuations imply considerable differences in how financial resources are allocated to support renewable energy investments. Furthermore, it is clear that, over time, both the funding assistance and the renewable energy consumption rate have been declining. This decrease in financial aid is consistent with the declining renewable energy consumption trend. This finding is compelling evidence that the amount of financial assistance offered to encourage renewable energy investment significantly impacts the rate at which renewable energy is consumed. The relationship between these two variables shows that decreased financial support may factor in the drop in renewable energy consumption.
Figure 3 shows how the contribution of each sector to the economy and the renewable energy consumption rate are related. The results show that sectoral economic contributions display various values during the study period. Notably, shifts in sectoral contributions are seen to cause changes in the trend of renewable energy use across time. This finding suggests that sectoral contributions to the economy influence Ethiopia’s patterns and trends of renewable energy consumption. The variations in sectoral contributions may impact the degree of demand for renewable energy and how well it is incorporated into various economic sectors. The dynamic character of these sectoral contributions raises the possibility that changes in economic sectors and their relative importance impact the trajectory of the national consumption of renewable energy. This demonstrates the relationship between sectoral advancements and Ethiopia’s adoption of renewable energy sources. The details for independent variables can be seen above in Table 5.
As shown below in Table 6, the regression analysis findings support the hypothesis that the variable of financial aid has a considerable and favorable influence on how rapidly renewable energy is used. This suggests a significant and positive impact on the consumption patterns observed over the long term when financial resources are committed to promoting renewable energy efforts. In other words, the results imply that foreign financial aid is crucial for boosting the use of renewable energy sources over a long period. These findings emphasize the value of offering financial assistance to promote investments in renewable energy.
This study’s findings suggest that continued financial assistance is crucial in promoting the development of the renewable energy sector. Such support can speed up the execution of renewable energy projects, promote R&D initiatives and stimulate innovation in clean energy technologies. The results also imply that financial support for renewable energy projects may be obtained via international cooperation and collaboration, with significant advantages.
The findings also indicate that the manufacturing sector has a long-term, beneficial and considerable influence on the rate of renewable energy use within the sectoral economy. The results, for instance, suggest a 1.4-unit increase in renewable energy consumption for every unit increase in the manufacturing sector’s value contributed to the overall economy. This suggests that the manufacturing industry dramatically influences renewable energy sources. The results further emphasize how the industrial sector has a big role in the uptake and use of renewable energy. One of the possible justifications for the positive relationship is due to the country’s current economic and renewable energy status. According to statistics from the National Bank of Ethiopia (2022), the manufacturing sector contributes less to the economy than other sectors. In recent years, the firm has grown modestly despite significant growth in the use of renewable energy. Among Ethiopia’s many renewable energy resources are hydropower, wind and solar. The proximity of these resources to manufacturing hubs may make renewable energy a convenient and logical choice for powering industrial processes. The growth of the industrial sector offers the potential for hastening the adoption of renewable energy technology and smoothing the transition to a low-carbon economy.
Conversely, Ethiopia’s mining industry significantly and negatively affects renewable energy consumption. This study findings shed light on the negative consequences that mining operations have on the commitment and use of renewable energy sources. This study’s results specifically show a decrease in renewable energy consumption of about 1.835720 units for every unit rise in the mining sector’s value generated by the economy. Renewable energy consumption decreases as the mining sector grows and makes more remarkable economic contributions to the country. One possible justification for this result is the issue of resource competition. The mining sector is resource-intensive and often competes for the same natural resources needed for renewable energy projects. Furthermore, the mining industry may be pretty energy-demanding, needing a lot of power and fuel for extraction and processing. As a result, the mining industry’s energy use may overwhelm renewable energy potential, making it harder to convert to cleaner energy sources.
Furthermore, it was discovered that Ethiopia’s service sector negatively affects the utilization of renewable energy. The research discovered that, for every unit rise in the value that the service sector adds to the economy, there is a corresponding decline in the usage of renewable energy of around 0.921179 units. This research emphasizes the possible conflicts between adopting renewable energy sources and the growth of the service sector, which is often linked to increased urbanization and commercial activity. There is a noticeable and quantitative reduction in the consumption of sustainable energy resources as the service sector grows and contributes more considerably to the nation’s economic output. One of the possible arguments for a negative relationship is the energy intensity of the service sector. The service industry, which includes banking, finance, hotels and retail firms, may be less energy-intensive than other sectors, such as manufacturing or heavy industries. Because energy use in the service sector is often more minor, there may be less urgency or motivation to transition to renewable energy sources. The following Table 7 of the study shows short-term relationship between variables.
The short-term regression analysis shows a distinct and notable relationship between financial support and the use of renewable energy. This study’s findings imply that increasing financial aid for renewable energy investments results in a favorable and significant increase in renewable energy consumption rates. Specifically, for every extra unit of financial aid supplied to encourage renewable energy efforts, the consumption rate of renewable energy is expected to rise by 0.002. This finding suggests that augmented provision of financial assistance will stimulate more significant investment in renewable energy projects, substantially expanding the country’s renewable energy capacity. Increased investment will enhance accessibility to renewable energy sources, fostering a higher consumption rate. In other words, more significant financial resources mean increased investment in renewable energy, leading to a more significant proportion of renewable energy generation within the country. Consequently, this surge in investment contributes to greater utilization of renewable energy and a subsequent increase in its consumption rate.
Surprisingly, examining both short-term and long-term correlations between independent and dependent variables yields comparable patterns in terms of direction and significance. This consistency demonstrates the robustness and reliability of the findings. This study reveals that certain variables, namely financial assistance and the manufacturing sector, positively and significantly impact Ethiopia’s renewable energy consumption rate. This favorable association applies to both the short-term and long-term consequences. Conversely, the service and mining sectors negatively influence renewable energy consumption rates in the short and long term. These data imply that these industries hurt renewable energy use. Furthermore, this research found that characteristics such as the agricultural, construction and commerce sectors have no substantial effect on renewable energy usage in the short or long term. These variables are deemed insignificant in terms of their impact on renewable energy consumption.
Another interesting conclusion from the research is the impact of economic growth, as assessed by the yearly growth rate of GDP. The results reveal that this variable does not significantly affect Ethiopia’s renewable energy consumption level. Economic growth, as captured by the GDP growth rate, is not a determining factor in shaping the country’s consumption rate of renewable energy.
Overall, these findings shed light on the factors that influence or impede Ethiopian renewable energy consumption, emphasizing the importance of financial assistance and the manufacturing sector while indicating limited impact from the service, mining, agricultural, construction and trade sectors, as well as economic growth as measured by GDP growth rate.

5. Conclusions and Policy Implications

This study examines the correlation between foreign financing, the sectoral economy and Ethiopia’s utilization of renewable energy using aggregate and disaggregate time series data. Furthermore, the impacts of the sectoral economy on renewable energy consumption share are investigated. It is revealed that sectoral contributions to Ethiopia’s economy fluctuate, affecting the trends in renewable energy use and influencing the country’s economic landscape. The manufacturing industry significantly impacts the utilization of renewable energy sources, emphasizing the need for continuous financial support and international cooperation for its growth. The results of analyzing the relationships between the independent and dependent variables over short and long durations are striking in that they exhibit persistent patterns of direction and importance. This consistency illustrates the findings’ robustness and reliability. This study also reveals that financial aid and manufacturing significantly impact Ethiopia’s renewable energy consumption rate in the short and long term. However, the service and mining industries have a negative impact. The agricultural, construction and trade sectors do not significantly influence renewable energy use. This research finds that economic development, as defined by GDP, has no substantial short or long-term influence on Ethiopia’s renewable energy usage. Based on this study’s findings, policies that focus on providing continuous financial support and fostering international cooperation to promote the growth of the manufacturing sector are recommended. This could include incentives for adopting renewable energy technologies and investing in renewable energy infrastructure. Since the service and mining industries negatively impact renewable energy use, there is a need to diversify renewable energy sources beyond these sectors. This could involve promoting renewable energy projects in other sectors, such as manufacturing, agriculture, construction and trade. Finally, policymakers should develop strategies that consider both short-term impacts and long-term trends to ensure sustainable growth in renewable energy use.

6. Limitations of the Study and Future Recommendations

This study is limited in that many factors contribute to reducing renewable energy consumption in Ethiopia. However, this research mainly considers economic aspects. Hence, this study strongly recommends other studies to explore other quantitative and qualitative factors that can affect the performance of renewable energy consumption in Ethiopia. Furthermore, this study focuses on aggregated data to examine the relationship between variables. However, other scholars can utilize disaggregated data to see if the outcomes are the same or different.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.G., Z.L., G.D., A.T. and A.B.; Methodology, E.G. and G.D.; Software, G.D.; Formal analysis, E.G. and G.D.; Investigation, Z.L., A.T. and A.B.; Resources, G.D., E.G., A.T., Z.L. and A.B.; Data curation, G.D., A.B. and A.T.; Writing–original draft, G.D. and E.G.; Supervision, Z.L., A.B. and A.T.; Project administration, Z.L., A.B. and A.T.; Funding acquisition, E.G. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This manuscript received no external funding; however, the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences covered the Article Processing fee.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data can be available based on request at [email protected].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adekoya, Oluwasegun B., Timilehin P. Ogunnusi, and Johnson A. Oliyide. 2021. Sector-by-sector non-renewable energy consumption shocks and manufacturing performance in the US: Analysis of the asymmetric issue with nonlinear ARDL and the role of structural breaks. Energy 222: 119947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adinew, Melaku. 2020. The Relationship Between Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Ethiopia: Empirical Evidence from ARDL Bound Testing Model. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy 10: 2224–3232. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed, Zahoor, Michael Cary, Muhammad Shahbaz, and Xuan Vinh Vo. 2021. Asymmetric nexus between economic policy uncertainty, renewable energy technology budgets, and environmental sustainability: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production 313: 127723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Altunkaya, Sefa Merve, and Mustafa Özcan. 2020. Emerging Financing Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Investments. Paper presented at 2020 12th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ELECO), Bursa, Turkey, November 26–28; pp. 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  5. Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin, and Elin Näsström. 2022. Role of banking sector performance in renewable energy consumption. Applied Energy 306: 118023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anton, Sorin Gabriel, and Anca Elena Afloarei Nucu. 2020. The effect of financial development on renewable energy consumption. A panel data approach. Renewable Energy 147: 330–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Apergis, Nicholas. 2019. Renewable energy and its finance as a solution to the environmental degradation. In Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). Edited by Burcu Özcan and Ilhan Öztürk. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp. 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. Asratie, Teshager Mazengia. 2021. Determinants of financial development in Ethiopia: ARDL approach. Cogent Economics & Finance 9: 1963063. [Google Scholar]
  9. Belay Kassa, A. 2019. Current Status, Future Potential and Barriers for Renewable Energy Development in Ethiopia. Iranian (Iranica) Journal of Energy and Environment 10: 269–74. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bohland, Moritz, and Sebastian Schwenen. 2022. Renewable support and strategic pricing in electricity markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization 80: 102792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boston, Jonathan, Architesh Panda, and Swenja Surminski. 2021. Designing a funding framework for the impacts of slow-onset climate change—Insights from recent experiences with planned relocation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 50: 159–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chan, Sander, Idil Boran, Harro van Asselt, Gabriela Iacobuta, Navam Niles, Katharine Rietig, Michelle Scobie, Jennifer S. Bansard, Deborah Delgado Pugley, Laurence L. Delina, and et al. 2019. Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 10: e572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, Xu, Zhongshu Li, Kevin P. Gallagher, and Denise L. Mauzerall. 2021. Financing carbon lock-in in developing countries: Bilateral financing for power generation technologies from China, Japan, and the United States. Applied Energy 300: 117318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chong, Daniel. 2018. The sustainable development goals and climate change. Social Alternatives 37: 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ciupageanu, Dana-Alexandra, Gheorghe Lazaroiu, and Lucian Mihaescu. 2021. Structure of the energy produced from renewable sources. In Innovative Renewable Waste Conversion Technologies. Edited by Gheorghe Lazaroiu and Lucian Mihaescu. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  16. Clark, Robyn, James Reed, and Terry Sunderland. 2017. Bridging funding gaps for climate and sustainable development: Pitfalls, progress and potential. CIFOR 2: 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dinçer, Hasan, Anton Lisin, Gözde Gülseven Ubay, and Çağatay Çağlayan. 2021. Identifying the best financing sources for renewable energy companies in Latin American countries. In Strategic Approaches to Energy Management: Current Trends in Energy Economics and Green Investment. Edited by Serhat Yüksel and Hasan Dinçer. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  18. Donastorg, Angelines Daihana, Suresh Renukappa, and Subashini Suresh. 2022. Financing renewable energy projects in the Dominican Republic: An empirical study. International Journal of Energy Sector Management 16: 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Doytch, Nadia, and Seema Narayan. 2016. Does FDI influence renewable energy consumption? An analysis of sectoral FDI impact on renewable and non-renewable industrial energy consumption. Energy Economics 54: 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Doytch, Nadia, and Seema Narayan. 2021. Does transitioning towards renewable energy accelerate economic growth? An analysis of sectoral growth for a dynamic panel of countries. Energy 235: 121290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Elie, Luc, Caroline Granier, and Sandra Rigot. 2021. The different types of renewable energy finance: A Bibliometric analysis. Energy Economics 93: 104997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, Xueqian, Zhonghui Wei, Hongbin Sun, and Youmin Zhang. 2024. Agri-Energy-Environment Synergy-Based Distributed Energy Planning in Rural Areas. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 2024: 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Girma, Zelalem. 2016. Challenge and opportunities on energy provision and rural electrification in Ethiopia. International Journal of Renewable Energy Technology 7: 184–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hailu, Ashebir Dingeto, and Desta Kalbessa Kumsa. 2021. Ethiopia renewable energy potentials and current state. Aims Energy 9: 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hameer, Sameer, and Netsanet Ejigu. 2020. A prospective review of renewable energy developments in Ethiopia. AAS Open Research 3: 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Isah, Abdulrasheed. 2019. A Tale of Two Countries: Financing Renewable Energy in Nigeria and Brazil. USAEE Working Paper No. 19-400. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3377029 (accessed on 10 April 2023).
  27. Iskandarova, Marfuga, Agata Dembek, Maria Fraaije, William Matthews, Agata Stasik, Julia M. Wittmayer, and Benjamin K. Sovacool. 2021. Who finances renewable energy in Europe? Examining temporality, authority and contestation in solar and wind subsidies in Poland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Energy Strategy Reviews 38: 100730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. James, Jack E. 2019. Can public financing of the private sector defeat antimicrobial resistance? Journal of Public Health 41: 422–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jijie, Dumitru-Tudor, Alexandru Maxim, Teodora Roman, and Mihail Roșcovan. 2021. Public acceptance and support of renewable energy in the north-east development region of Romania. Energies 14: 5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kebede, Kassahun Y. 2015. Viability study of grid-connected solar PV system in Ethiopia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 10: 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, Jung Eun. 2020. Regulation trumps economics? Examining renewable energy policy, diffusion and investment in 80 developing countries. Energy Research & Social Science 70: 101613. [Google Scholar]
  32. Komarnicka, Anna, and Anna Murawska. 2021. Comparison of consumption and renewable sources of energy in European Union Countries—Sectoral indicators, economic conditions and environmental impacts. Energies 14: 3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kotu, Teshome Bekele. 2012. Renewable for rural electrification in Ethiopia. Master’s thesis, KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management Energy Technology EGI, Stockholm, Sweden, December. [Google Scholar]
  34. Le, Thai-Ha, Canh Phuc Nguyen, and Donghyun Park. 2020. Financing renewable energy development: Insights from 55 countries. Energy Research & Social Science 68: 101537. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, Zhen, Jinhang Xu, Yiming Wei, Assem Abu Hatab, and Jing Lan. 2021. Nexus between green financing, renewable energy generation, and energy efficiency: Empirical insights through DEA technique. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30: 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Maji, Ibrahim Kabiru, and Sagir Adamu. 2021. The impact of renewable energy consumption on sectoral environmental quality in Nigeria. Cleaner Environmental Systems 2: 100009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mehedintu, Anca, Georgeta Soava, Mihaela Sterpu, and Eugenia Grecu. 2021. Evolution and forecasting of the renewable energy consumption in the frame of sustainable development: EU vs. Romania. Sustainability 13: 10327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Michaelowa, Axel, Stephan Hoch, Anne-Kathrin Weber, Ruth Kassaye, and Tesfaye Hailu. 2021. Mobilising private climate finance for sustainable energy access and climate change mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Climate Policy 21: 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mullins, David, and Bruce Walker. 2009. The impact of direct public funding for private developers on non-profit housing networks in England: Exploring a research agenda. European Journal of Housing Policy 9: 201–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Njoh, Ambe J. 2021. A systematic review of environmental determinants of renewable energy performance in Ethiopia: A PESTECH analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 147: 111243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Packham, Natalie. 2021. Structured climate financing: Valuation of CDO on inhomogeneous asset pools. SN Business & Economics 1: 59. [Google Scholar]
  42. Paul, Christopher John, and Erika Weinthal. 2019. The development of Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy 2011–14: Implications for rural adaptation. Climate and Development 11: 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pesaran, Hashem Mohammad, and Larry W. Taylor. 1999. Diagnostics for IV regressions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61: 255–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qadir, Sikandar Abdul, Hessah Al-Motairi, Furqan Tahir, and Luluwah Al-Fagih. 2021. Incentives and strategies for financing the renewable energy transition: A review. Energy Reports 7: 3590–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Raikar, Santosh, and Seabron Adamson. 2020. Renewable energy finance in the international context. In Renewable Energy Finance. Theory and Practice. Edited by Santosh Raikar and Seabron Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp. 185–220. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rudkovskyy, Serhii. 2020. The influence of the investment factor on the transformation of the global energy market. Technology Audit and Production Reserves 4: 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu. 2021. Failure to control economic sectoral inefficiencies through policy stringency disrupts environmental performance. Science of The Total Environment 772: 145603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Scarpellini, Sabina, José Ángel Gimeno, Pilar Portillo-Tarragona, and Eva Llera-Sastresa. 2021. Financial resources for the investments in renewable self-consumption in a circular economy framework. Sustainability 13: 6838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Simionescu, Mihaela, Wadim Strielkowski, and Manuela Tvaronavičienė. 2020. Renewable energy in final energy consumption and income in the EU-28 countries. Energies 13: 2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2021. Clean, low-carbon but corrupt? Examining corruption risks and solutions for the renewable energy sector in Mexico, Malaysia, Kenya and South Africa. Energy Strategy Reviews 38: 100723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tahiru, Abdul-Wahab, Silas Uwumborge Takal, Emmanuel Daanoba Sunkari, and Steve Ampofo. 2023. A Review on Renewable Energy Scenario in Ethiopia. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment 14: 372–84. [Google Scholar]
  52. Tiruye, Girum Ayalneh, Abreham Tesfaye Besha, Yedilfana Setarge Mekonnen, Natei Ermias Benti, Gebrehiwet Abrham Gebreslase, and Ramato Ashu Tufa. 2021. Opportunities and challenges of renewable energy production in Ethiopia. Sustainability 13: 10381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tsao, Yu-Chung, Thuy-Linh Vu, and Jye-Chyi Lu. 2021. Pricing, capacity and financing policies for investment of renewable energy generations. Applied Energy 303: 117664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Usman, Ojonugwa, Andrew Adewale Alola, and George N. Ike. 2021. Modelling the effect of energy consumption on different environmental indicators in the United States: The role of financial development and renewable energy innovations. Natural Resources Forum 45: 441–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vogeler, Colette S. 2019. Market-based governance in farm animal welfare—A comparative analysis of public and private policies in Germany and France. Animals 9: 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhong, Weichen, Junnian Song, Wei Yang, Kai Fang, and Xiaoyu Liu. 2021. Evolving household consumption-driven industrial energy consumption under urbanization: A dynamic input-output analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 289: 125732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the study.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the study.
Economies 12 00127 g001
Figure 2. The trend of renewable consumption rate and level of financing.
Figure 2. The trend of renewable consumption rate and level of financing.
Economies 12 00127 g002
Figure 3. The trend of renewable consumption rate and sectoral economy relationship. Source: Performed by authors using Excel sheet.
Figure 3. The trend of renewable consumption rate and sectoral economy relationship. Source: Performed by authors using Excel sheet.
Economies 12 00127 g003
Table 1. Sample of sectoral economy used.
Table 1. Sample of sectoral economy used.
GroupSectors Group Name Measurement
1Agriculture, hunting, forestry, fishingAgriculture sector Aggregate value is added to the economy as the percent of the gross domestic product.
2Mining and utilitiesMining sector
3ConstructionConstruction sector
4ManufacturingManufacturing sector
5Wholesale, retail trade, restaurants, hotelsTrade sector
6Transport, storage, communicationService sector
Source: Created by authors, 2024.
Table 2. Result of stationarity test with the ADF test.
Table 2. Result of stationarity test with the ADF test.
At LevelAt 1st DifferenceDecision
Variables Trend and InterceptTrend and Intercept
RE0.80340.0071 ***I(1)
GDP0.16180.0042 ***I(1)
FI0.0063 ***0.0000 ***I(0)
AS0.0023 ***0.0008 ***I(0)
MIS0.2924 0.0158 **I(1)
CS0.7203 0.0037 ***I(1)
MAS0.59450.0008 ***I(1)
TS0.39400.0551 *I(1)
SS0.0003 ***0.0033 ***I(0)
Source: E-views output. Note: *** implies a 1 percent significance level, ** implies a 5 percent significance level, and * implies a 10 percent significance level. The numbers given in the table show the probability of a significance level derived from the t-statistics value.
Table 3. Result of ARDL bounds testing.
Table 3. Result of ARDL bounds testing.
F-Bounds TestNull Hypothesis: No Levels of Relationship
Test StatisticValueSignif.I(0)I(1)
Asymptotic: n = 1000
F-statistic4.55907310%1.852.85
k85%2.113.15
2.5%2.333.42
1%2.623.77
Table 4. Lag selection criteria of the model.
Table 4. Lag selection criteria of the model.
Endogenous Variables: RE GDP FI AS CS MAS MIS SS TS
Exogenous Variables: C
Included Observations: 21
LagLogLLRFPEAICSCHQ
0−600.229NA 1.28 × 101458.0217858.4694358.11893
1−469.54136.9123 *2.39 × 1012 *53.28950 *57.76602 *54.26102 *
* indicates lag order selected by the criterion; LR: sequential modified LR test statistic (each test at the 5% level).
Table 5. Descriptive statistics results.
Table 5. Descriptive statistics results.
ASCSFIGDPMASMISRESSTS
Mean5.99264916.10743339.21188.66317110.6408610.0868492.7154511.2131510.52459
Median6.37470513.2144376.855009.1832939.6947199.51850393.8200010.9641310.92357
Maximum16.9083638.727104237.38013.5727324.6551620.2894395.5500021.0006219.48041
Minimum−10.494602.8224040.330000−2.1610840.7877831.73985989.500001.1587453.491725
Std. Dev.5.4058569.128836888.58433.7301026.1025144.9547612.0681964.6656605.006331
Observations222222222222222222
Source: E-views output.
Table 6. Long-term coefficients of the model.
Table 6. Long-term coefficients of the model.
Long-Term Coefficients
VariableCoefficientStd. Errort-StatisticProb.
GDP1.1480220.8461831.3567060.2329
FI0.002120.0008612.46280.057
AS−0.3120710.344168−0.906740.4061
CS−0.1812760.102054−1.776270.1358
MAS1.4666330.533292.7501580.0403
MIS−1.835720.648216−2.831960.0366
SS−0.9211790.407127−2.262630.0731
TS−0.545380.292273−1.8660.121
C104.6723664.33030224.172070
Source: E-views output.
Table 7. Short-term relationship.
Table 7. Short-term relationship.
Dependent Variable: RE
Cointegrating Form
VariableCoefficientStd. Errort-StatisticProb.
D(GDP)0.0885240.1277920.6927190.5193
D(FI)0.000210.0000952.2077920.0783
D(AS)−0.0598370.068222−0.8770910.4206
D(CS)0.0301720.0149852.0134790.1002
D(MAS)0.2812150.0831263.3829880.0196
D(MIS)−0.2202210.088714−2.4823750.0557
D(SS)−0.1043260.03914−2.6654790.0446
D(TS)0.0301820.0466770.6466190.5464
CointEq(−1)−0.1917420.054812−3.4981970.0173
Cointeq = RE − (1.1480 × GDP + 0.0021 × FI − 0.3121 × AS − 0.1813 × CS + 1.4666
× MAS − 1.8357 × MIS − 0.9212 × SS − 0.5454 × TS + 104.6724)
Source: E-views output.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Getachew, E.; Lakner, Z.; Desalegn, G.; Tangl, A.; Boros, A. Sustainable Financing for Renewable Energy: Examining the Impact of Sectoral Economy on Renewable Energy Consumption. Economies 2024, 12, 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12060127

AMA Style

Getachew E, Lakner Z, Desalegn G, Tangl A, Boros A. Sustainable Financing for Renewable Energy: Examining the Impact of Sectoral Economy on Renewable Energy Consumption. Economies. 2024; 12(6):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12060127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Getachew, Edosa, Zoltan Lakner, Goshu Desalegn, Anita Tangl, and Anita Boros. 2024. "Sustainable Financing for Renewable Energy: Examining the Impact of Sectoral Economy on Renewable Energy Consumption" Economies 12, no. 6: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12060127

APA Style

Getachew, E., Lakner, Z., Desalegn, G., Tangl, A., & Boros, A. (2024). Sustainable Financing for Renewable Energy: Examining the Impact of Sectoral Economy on Renewable Energy Consumption. Economies, 12(6), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12060127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop