Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Distribution Feeder Reconfiguration Based on a Chu and Beasley Genetic Algorithm with an MST-Constrained Search Space to Ensure Radiality
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vision-Based Trajectory Generation and Kinematic Modeling for Human-like Grasp Reproduction in a Robotic Prosthetic Hand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Optimisation Techniques for Multi-Robot Path Planning: A Review of Collision Avoidance and Performance Metrics in Connectivity, Efficiency and Safety

School of Engineering and Built Environment, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Technologies 2026, 14(6), 337; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14060337
Submission received: 1 April 2026 / Revised: 27 May 2026 / Accepted: 29 May 2026 / Published: 30 May 2026

Abstract

Path planning is critical for multi-robot systems (MRS), directly affecting the operation efficiency, execution time, and operational cost. Despite extensive research and successful applications of multiple algorithms, achieving globally optimal solutions in cluttered or dynamic environments remains a significant challenge. Issues such as scalability with an increasing number of robots, computational efficiency, system robustness, and coordination complexity continue to drive the development of more reliable approaches. This study reviews modelling approaches, optimisation criteria, and solution algorithms based on the roadmap planning methods that are widely used for multi-robot path planning (MRPP). It focuses on three graph-based algorithms: MRPP algorithm, central algorithm (CA), and the optimisation central algorithm (OCA). These algorithms utilise visibility graphs (VG) for environment representation and Dijkstra’s algorithm for shortest path computation, while incorporating algebraic connectivity to improve coordination, safety, and scalability. In addition, the technological context and implementation platforms, including simulation environments, cloud robotics, and AI-based frameworks, are conceptually examined. The potential applications of these methods in assistive robotics are highlighted, particularly in supporting a safe and reliable navigation in healthcare and human-centred environments. The article synthesises theoretical and practical insights, identifies current limitations and challenges, and outlines future research directions for efficient, scalable, and robust MRPP.
Keywords: multi-robot path planning; graph-based planning; visibility graphs; algebraic connectivity; collision avoidance; optimisation-based planning; connectivity preservation multi-robot path planning; graph-based planning; visibility graphs; algebraic connectivity; collision avoidance; optimisation-based planning; connectivity preservation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alwafi, F.A.S.; Saatchi, R. Optimisation Techniques for Multi-Robot Path Planning: A Review of Collision Avoidance and Performance Metrics in Connectivity, Efficiency and Safety. Technologies 2026, 14, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14060337

AMA Style

Alwafi FAS, Saatchi R. Optimisation Techniques for Multi-Robot Path Planning: A Review of Collision Avoidance and Performance Metrics in Connectivity, Efficiency and Safety. Technologies. 2026; 14(6):337. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14060337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alwafi, Fatma A. S., and Reza Saatchi. 2026. "Optimisation Techniques for Multi-Robot Path Planning: A Review of Collision Avoidance and Performance Metrics in Connectivity, Efficiency and Safety" Technologies 14, no. 6: 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14060337

APA Style

Alwafi, F. A. S., & Saatchi, R. (2026). Optimisation Techniques for Multi-Robot Path Planning: A Review of Collision Avoidance and Performance Metrics in Connectivity, Efficiency and Safety. Technologies, 14(6), 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14060337

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop