Next Article in Journal
Effect of Speculators’ Position Changes on the LME Futures Market
Previous Article in Journal
Investor Attention and Stock Market Activities: New Evidence from Panel Data
Open AccessArticle

Two Investment Options for Bearish ETF Investors: Inverse ETF and Shorting ETF

1
Department of Banking and International Finance, Faculty of National Economy, University of Economics in Bratislava, Dolnozemská cesta 1, 852 35 Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Lipová 41a, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2019, 7(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs7020031
Received: 25 October 2018 / Revised: 6 June 2019 / Accepted: 10 June 2019 / Published: 13 June 2019
A high liquidity, low expense ratio and the possibility to conduct arbitrage allow exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to be used for short sales. Bearish investors can also buy inverse ETFs. This paper aims to outline two investment approaches for bearish ETF investors and the differences between these two approaches; it also aims to examine the relationship between price and an indicator of volume and evaluate the final positions in selected ETFs in selected periods. Short ETFs dominate in simplicity, flexibility, paying out dividends and especially in the limited size of the loss. On the other hand, their structure, which demands daily rebalancing, causes substantial deviation from the benchmark in the long-term and leads to a higher expense ratio, and lower liquidity increases bid-ask spreads. Negative aspects of ETF short selling lie in unlimited loss, high borrowing costs, the need for margin accounts, variability of loan fees and the possibility of a transaction recall by the lender. On the contrary, margin operations enable potentially higher appreciation of capital by generating rebate rates. Our results show that with the decrease in value of the most used ETFs, short interest is growing for those funds where there is a very strong negative correlation implying hedging tendencies. Short selling proved to be a more advantageous strategy in the observed period of market downturn, as well as in 2011–2017, due to negative returns, however, by applying margin trading inverse ETFs turned out to make less losses. Sector-oriented inverse ETFs are the exception, where the largest differences between these two strategies are recorded. However, the final conclusion of the suitability of one of the analyzed strategies depends on the market volatility and the direction of the market itself. View Full-Text
Keywords: bearish expectation; exchange-traded fund (ETF); inverse ETF; short sale bearish expectation; exchange-traded fund (ETF); inverse ETF; short sale
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Chovancová, B.; Dorocáková, M.; Linnertová, D. Two Investment Options for Bearish ETF Investors: Inverse ETF and Shorting ETF. Int. J. Financial Stud. 2019, 7, 31.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop