Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Job Satisfaction and Intention to Quit Job Among Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Socioeconomic Determinants of Career Intention in Pharmacy Students in Vietnam
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing the Role of Community Pharmacists in Medication Safety: A Qualitative Study of Voices from the Frontline
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Healthcare Practice Post COVID-19 Impacts: Will 21st Century Pharmacists Become Global, Agile, Collaborative and Curated?

School of Dentistry and Medical Science, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmacy 2025, 13(6), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13060162
Submission received: 18 September 2025 / Revised: 28 October 2025 / Accepted: 30 October 2025 / Published: 3 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection New Insights into Pharmacy Teaching and Learning during COVID-19)

Abstract

Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Winston Churchill. In recent times, globally, approximately three pandemics and thousands of natural disasters and political upheavals have been recorded. In most cases, tens to hundreds of thousands of people have died as a result, whether from droughts, famines, floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, wildfires, landslides, cyclones, typhoons, hurricanes, extreme heat, emerging or resurgent diseases or longer-term issues such as sustainability, climate change and/or global warming. Whilst many accommodations may have been made to cope with these, we propose that pharmacy education and professional practice benefit from learning from the past, from collaboration globally to manage the hectic and uncertain times that result from these disruptions and from curation and evaluation of these initiatives for ongoing and/or future use.

1. Introduction

Education for the 21st century reflects practice, technological and structural changes from earlier times. For example, in the early-mid 20th century, community pharmacists were often practising as single practitioners seeing individual patients in a discrete practice site addressing acute illnesses or injuries. However, hospital pharmacists practised as part of a pharmacy team with responsibilities to out-patients, in-patients by health needs. Coming into the 21st century, patients now seek ongoing care for chronic health conditions, from a multidisciplinary team in broader community settings concerned with population health [1,2], and hospital pharmacists more frequently as a member of multidisciplinary team.
Education for the 21st century likewise needs to reflect positive and negative impacts on health, such as significant drug discoveries, technological change and development during the 20th century and through to current times, emerging and re-emerging diseases [3], and obesogenic lifestyles and information seeking from online sources, colloquially identified as “Dr. Google” [4]. Health education also benefits from considering the impacts of generational change [5], smart phones [6], artificial intelligence [7], 3D printers for medicines [8], smart bottles [9], and virtual reality [10], keeping current with new and emerging technology.

Observations on the Development of Professionals and Practice: Insights from History

From the early days of humanity, there were people with different skills who offered different services to their communities. Those people, under a variety of titles, were responsible for caring for the sick and the injured. In time, these roles were characterised as professions with expectations of each profession to society and the reciprocity of the community to the professions. This relationship became known as a social contract.
Over time, many different groups of people caring for the sick and injured were recognised as professionals, such as nurses, dentists, pharmacists (apothecary/chemist), physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and emerging groups such as exercise physiologists. Along with this development has come the expectation of some standardisation and comparability within health professional groups. This led to incremental change in the preparation for practice from apprenticeship models to apprenticeship plus some formal foundational knowledge, to formal academic qualifications which may lead to practice or to an intern training period, with a final review or assessment leading to registration as a fully fledged health professional, such as a pharmacist.
Pharmacy curricula are based on foundational sciences such as physiology, clinical knowledge and skills relevant to the pharmacy profession, and social sciences and skills, particularly the social determinants of health. The social determinants of health are important as they are reported, for example, to contribute to or account for 25 to 60% of deaths in the United States in any given year [11]. Conceptualisations of the social determinants may vary a little but essentially there are factors at two levels. The first level is at the individual level and includes education, employment status, housing and food availability and safety; the second level is at the community level and includes factors such as air pollution levels, personal security and safety and housing quality [11].
So, health is conceptualised as more than an absence of disease or injury but rather as the interplay of biological factors such as genetic inheritance; access to health services not only for treatment but also for screening and monitoring for health conditions; environmental factors such as climate change [12,13]; natural disasters such as floods [14], wildfires [15], tsunami [16] or earthquakes [17]; and the individual’s lifestyle choices and practices such as diet, exercise, and stress management. This highlights the reality that there are challenges to health in the 21st century, with six basic principles identified. These are (a) disease prevention and health promotion, (b) reducing inequalities in health, (c) cooperation between different sectors of society, (d) active community engagement, (e) primary healthcare and (f) international cooperation [18].
To date, the following changes have been observed—more years of education, increasing training and professional development for expanded scope activities, a higher registerable qualification such as Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm. D.), more use of online learning, more preparation to participate in telehealth, healthcare robots [19], use of high- fidelity simulations to learn and demonstrate professional skills. Of concern, emerging digital health issues have been identified: computer vision syndrome [19]; text neck or tech neck [20]; digital dementia [21,22]; internet “addiction” or “always on culture” [23,24,25]; and selfie elbow [26].
Pharmacy curricula are informed by foundational knowledge, clinical reasoning, decision-making strategies, ethical behavioural expectations, effective communication skills, anticipations of empathy and caring, and development of professionalism. Nonetheless, curricula, even within the same nation, region or city, may utilise different learning modalities to achieve these objectives. Selected modalities or influences will be discussed in greater detail below.
In the twentieth century and in the twenty-first century, communities around the globe have been affected by infectious diseases, such as the 1918 pandemic influenza, 2009 H1N1 influenza, and more locally such as Ebola, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Zika virus [27]. In late 2019, a novel coronavirus (SARS Cov-2) was identified, and the condition which resulted from infection was and is referred to as COVID-19. The World Health Organisation declared a global outbreak, which resulted in a pandemic on 11 March 2020. Some commentators declared COVID-19 to be a “once in a lifetime pandemic” given the level of morbidity and mortality inherent in the condition. Initially, there were no recognised vaccines produced, nor approved medications to treat the condition, with over 2.4 million deaths reported by late February 2021 [27]. In an attempt to contain COVID-19, local, regional and global lockdowns resulted; however, during the lockdowns, most community and hospital pharmacies remained accessible to provide necessary medications for acute and chronic conditions; support quality use of medicines especially antimicrobial stewardship; manage medication shortages and acceptable alternatives, hand sanitiser products, antiseptic and disinfectant products, personal protective equipment such as masks and gloves, and consumer products such as tissues, toilet paper and paper towels. Once vaccines became available, pharmacists were identified in many nations as accessible and effective vaccinators [28,29], assisting in the rollouts as supplies became more available, and in mass vaccinations of health professionals [30]. Subsequent to this activity, pharmacists in developed countries, and in some low-resource nations, have seen significant and often substantial expansion of the scope of practice into, for example, prescribing [31], therapeutic substitution [32], and public health roles [33].
For many pharmacists, the net effect was to be recognised as frontline health professionals and often valued for their commitment [34]. Indeed, Hennekam and colleagues [34] characterised them and other non-physician healthcare workers as being viewed by the public as “heroes” rather than “invisible” according to previous perspectives. However, with medication shortages and other availability challenges, not all pharmacists received recognition as heroes [35], with some in the United States of America and globally being abused and on occasion assaulted, reflecting frustration with the shortage of prescription medicines and consumables such as tissues, paper towels, hand sanitiser and toilet paper.
Whilst natural disasters such as floods, droughts, wildfires, and earthquakes may cause changes to practice in healthcare workers, the effects are more localised than a global pandemic. Wars and political upheavals vary in their impact based on scale, such that a World War would likely affect most nations, whilst a political upheaval more often affects a single nation or two divided nations.
Even in a global pandemic such as COVID-19, different outcomes and lessons have been observed and reported. In the United Kingdom, for example, healthcare workers were reported to have different behaviours and concerns, such as fear of infection in themselves, concern for their families’ health and safety, some experience of stigma, and the desire for more support from their organisations, colleagues, governments and regulatory bodies.

2. Professionalism and Changing Needs and Practices

Professionalism is generally considered to reflect personal integrity and trustworthiness, plus altruism, humanistic values, accountability, ethical practices, clinical competence and culturally safe communication [36]. Professionalism is a strongly desired characteristic for health professionals and health professional students. But what characterises “professionalism” has changed across the 20th century and into the 21st century, reflective of significant global changes. The agents of change are many but include emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases, climate change, ageing populations, digital technology, AI, environmental hazards such as micro-plastics, different lifestyle choices, rural-to-urban population shifts, and uncertain times [36].
However, are students taught professionalism consistent with 21st century values and lifestyles? Are the traditional humanistic values even more important in this time, when AI guides surgical robots, provides diagnoses of skin cancers, manages autonomous vehicles, or are they less important? Further, pharmacists are not protected from working with robots, nor from associated ethical challenges. Table 1 highlights emerging health support technologies, such as dispensing robots, which are currently utilised, along with potentially autonomous mobility scooters and personal care and social robots, which may be widely stocked in pharmacies in the future. We argue that humanistic values are even more important but in need of additions to address the vastly different world in which students will practice as future pharmacy practitioners.

3. Professional Identity Development

Developing an effective professional identity requires intending health professionals to internalise and demonstrate the behavioural norms, morals, ethics, standards and competencies of their intended professional community. So that one comes, over time, to “walk the walk, and talk the talk” or to think, act and feel like a member of the profession they seek to join [43].
Curricula usually incorporate several activities that demonstrate successful professional identity, and while some students absorb and incorporate the relevant information and communication style, and develop the necessary skills seemingly effortlessly, others find the development more challenging. COVID-19 had a number of impacts, some strengthening perceptions of professional identity as student volunteers joined the “surge” workforce, and others that impacted negatively, causing students to feel unsettled in their future profession and their current course. Similarly, natural disasters, pandemics and wars also impact professional identity development [44].
There are many factors that impact the development of a robust professional identity; however, as Trede asserts [45] though every professional has “a” professional identity, some professionals may be unable to articulate their future professions’ professional values and delineate them from personal beliefs or perceptions unless well prepared for their future work role in authentic sites during experiential learning. Trede proposes that students benefit from the application of disciplinary knowledge and technical skills, but as importantly, experiential learning in authentic sites helps students develop self-leadership skills and capacities such as communicating effectively with others, working collaboratively in a team, and learning workplace argot and culture [45].
However, lessons from the global pandemic and the associated changes in healthcare, such as increased remote health practices, raise questions about the sustainability of experiential learning as a predominant educational intervention for professional identity development. Table 2 displays examples of experiential learning and some alternatives utilised during COVID-19.

4. Discussion

4.1. The Emerging Role of Technology (AI, Diagnosis, Surgery, 3D Printing Medicines)

COVID-19 has not only impacted the health and behaviours of people globally, it has also impacted healthcare and the modes of offering healthcare. With initial uncertainty about transmission and public health responses such as lockdowns, digital health was viewed as a potential contributor to management and solutions with adaptations such as telehealth and electronic health records [57]. However, while any innovation has potential benefits, it also comes with some challenges, such as patient privacy and rights, with equity and security issues rapidly evolving societal healthcare needs [57].
Our students benefit from developing the knowledge arising from this global pandemic, building skills in the safe and effective use of AI, telehealth etiquette and technology operation for the security of data collected or shared and protective environmental modifications, such as screens and personal protective equipment to communicate effectively with patients, maintaining privacy and confidentiality.

4.2. Global Health, Coping with the Unexpected, and Sustainability

One key outcome of the global pandemic arising from COVID-19 was the necessity to think globally, to collaborate broadly, and to then act locally or regionally, consistent with needs and resource base. This was well exemplified by the global “World Café” held by health professional educators and reported in 2020 [58]. This gathering resulted from a strategy to cross geographical boundaries to reflect on common educational challenges and share ideas and solutions. Further, this “World Café” venue facilitated networking and mentorship amongst educators to engage with and support others undergoing similar experiences. This facilitated new approaches to educational goals by bringing together experienced and less experienced educators whose brainstorming and sharing led to synergies that often generated novel solutions and also lessened the feelings of isolation that responses to COVID-19, such as lockdowns or working only from home with online teaching, generated. Although not specifically identified as such, the “World Café” we would propose operated in the spirit of “One Health” as disseminated by the One Health Commission, since 21st century health issues are increasingly global and complex, blending issues such as emerging diseases and global warming, for example, and benefitting when professionals with different skills, such as researchers, practitioners and educators, seek short-term and longer-term solutions to those issues.
However, nations, national governments and global bodies benefit from considering how to allocate enough resources to educating sufficient health professionals; to developing sufficient access to healthcare whether as hospitals, community clinics, urgent care clinics, satellite hospitals or other points of care relevant to their nations; to encourage scientists, researchers and clinicians to innovate and develop projects seeking new drug developments, new modes of care such as robotic carers, new concepts of isolation, long-life shelf-stable food, sufficient personal protective equipment; and for educators to develop curricula that an unexpected pandemic, natural disaster or political upheaval cannot as easily disrupt. Perhaps incorporating insights from a Japanese concept of “Bosai”, which incorporates a wide range of activities from mitigation and prevention to post-impact management and re-development, could also be beneficial [59].
Educators, regulators, governments and key stakeholders currently have a “golden opportunity” to review the global and local needs of public health and community health to inform strategies for pharmacy students’ education going forward in the 21st century.
Some educators have sought to develop a curriculum reflective of the needs of the 21st century and the benefits of being well prepared and vigilant. For example, Huss and colleagues in 2020 [60] report that 4.4% of global greenhouse gas emissions are attributable to healthcare and identify the need for curricula to be informed by this, given the link identified between sustainable healthcare practices and the development of professional identity.
Further, Levett-Jones and colleagues incorporated a literature review to generate statements addressing sustainability knowledge, necessary nursing skills, and issues arising from climate change, followed by a Delphi study to seek consensus on these statements from 42 international experts [61]. These educators clearly identify that neither members of the public nor patients contributed to this process, yet both may be affected by the care they could receive during the next pandemic or natural disaster, war or political upheaval.

4.3. Technology Is Rarely Neutral

Although technology can be one of the solutions to challenges such as COVID-19, natural disasters, and unsettled times, it is important that educators, practitioners, and students remember that technology is rarely both neutral and equitable. All stakeholders benefit from being aware of the health, ethical, acceptability, affordability and policy challenges that seem inherent in technology.
Further, technology can be vulnerable to issues such as solar flares [62], software issues such as a global CrowdStrike issue recently [63], and power interruptions (short-term or longer) due to natural disasters or wars. For sustainability, back-ups or alternate sources need to be considered and readily available.
Educators, regulators, governments, and key stakeholders currently have the opportunity to review the global and local needs of public health and community health to inform health education for all health students going forward, transitioning from becoming to being health professionals in the 21st century. These needs benefit from being informed by the differential impact of COVID-19 and impacts from other future pandemics, natural disasters, wars, and political upheavals. Pharmacy registering bodies have a particular role and opportunity during trying and uncertain times and preparing for them. Registering bodies accredit pharmacy courses and register pharmacists who have met the requirements to graduate and completed activities beneficial for practice, often during an intern year post-graduation. They set standards for practice and protect their communities by maintaining registers of qualified pharmacists by upholding codes of conduct and acting proactively to maintain safe practice during trying and uncertain times. These bodies play a crucial role in supporting and maintaining the social contract of pharmacy as a profession with the communities served.

5. Conclusions

There is little doubt that the COVID-19 pandemic and measures to contain and manage it have affected individuals’, communities’, and nations’ lives; access to healthcare, including necessary medicines and management of chronic diseases; and access to screening and monitoring, such as mammograms. In addition, COVID-19 has changed the face of primary care and institutional care in hospitals and residential care, with healthcare workers’ practice including more administrative tasks, more telehealth, and some abuse from patients and some praise. Some pharmacists struggled with being abused and blamed for medicine shortages that were global and that they had little to no control over.
In addition, social distancing and isolation significantly affected mental health, especially feelings of anxiety, depression, and disconnection from friends, family, and their community [64]. This social isolation and disruption were also identified as having impacted social cohesion, with inappropriate behaviours such as abuse, and later criminal actions such as physical assaults, robberies, and home invasions.
On a more positive note, technology has demonstrated the capacity to spare some healthcare workers the necessary patient care, with AI and robotic carers absorbing some of that load. Most healthcare workers such as pharmacists who work in community and/or institutional settings experienced a necessary expansion of scope and decision making to address community concerns, needs and wants [27]. This impacted the education and training of pharmacists and other healthcare workers and students, as these activities transitioned from an emergency need to an expected practice.
However, the pandemic also identified a core capability that facilitates managing change in uncertain times: adaptability. This capability reflects the capacity to undertake and achieve learning goals and objectives with considered thought and strategic approaches. Zhang and colleagues [65] report on the situation in China, where students undertook to “Suspend Classes without Stopping Learning” by engaging with learning online. Their research established that adaptability, or the capacity to respond successfully to change and/or uncertain conditions, and student engagement are significantly positively correlated with positive academic emotion, and the reverse also applies [65]. They further proposed that there are three necessary components to adaptability: a cognitive domain (thoughts), a behavioural domain (actions), and an affective domain. Zhang and colleagues [65] further considered research exploring other aspects of adaptability, such as Besser and colleagues’ study [66] on students’ personality traits. This study established that the big five personality traits significantly predicted adaptability to the COVID-19 pandemic. Extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were positively associated with adaptability, whilst neuroticism was negatively associated [66].
This synthesis of the results of prior work by Zhang and colleagues provides a developmental path for educators, students, and practitioners to better manage concerning and uncertain situations.
Unfortunately, in exploring the impact of COVID-19 on students’, practitioners’ and educators’ coping skills, burnout and mental health issues, some differences between nations, communities and learning approaches became apparent. Differences between pragmatic and more dramatic personality characteristics, differences between collectivist and more individualistic community characteristics [67,68,69], and differences in exposure to natural disasters [70,71,72], wars, and political upheavals [73,74] were noted. Therefore, it may require a customised approach rather than a single global approach addition, but it could benefit from sharing of information and resources where relevant [75], learning from other experiences and solutions. This re-imagining of health education, upskilling, scope modifications and practice could benefit from collaboration between the health professions, since this may include some scope expansions or sharing regulatory authorities’ roles, perhaps consolidating legal bodies with impacts on health, patients, consumers, practitioners, educators and workplace learning supervisors. Overall, this modified experience of healthcare benefits from considerations of access, equity, collegiality, and how practitioners choose to live, work, learn, stay or go. Change is now the “new normal”!

6. Future Directions

There are many potential impacts on pharmacy education, expansions of scope, scope-sharing, professional identity development and activities such as prescribing. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, actions such as the rapid adoption of online learning, simulation, virtual reality, telehealth counselling and information provision, and AI were arguably taken in haste, but there is now an opportunity to establish the future role within all the learning activities and their contribution to the development of a robust, resilient professional pharmacy profession.
However, of concern, for all the changes made and planned, especially in the rapidly changing times of “Doctor Google” and generative AI, will pharmacy as a profession still exist and still be needed, or might it shatter into other roles? Already, there are medical centre pharmacists, ambulance services pharmacists, prescribing pharmacists, advanced practice pharmacists, and others which are now becoming career tracks rather than role differentiations, such as renal pharmacists and cardiovascular pharmacists by disease or body system, as already exist. We propose that pharmacy will exist and will reinvent itself to serve populations’ needs, informed by its historical pathway and its commitment to the “social contract” with communities as outlined earlier.
Future research can establish this and identify the impact of activities such as those proposed to strengthen capability, adaptability, and resilience, fine-tuning these in readiness for the next challenge. Most importantly, research can establish the appropriate site and access for curation of these materials, not just those such as workplace learning [76], but all the materials in this collaborative global strategy for the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.D.S., J.J. and J.L.C.; data curation: M.D.S.; writing—original draft preparation: M.D.S.; writing—review and editing: M.D.S., J.J. and J.L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analysed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Borkan, J.M.; Hammoud, M.M.; Nelson, E.; Oyler, J.; Lawson, L.; Starr, S.R.; Gonzalo, J.D. Health systems science education: The new post-Flexner professionalism for the 21st century. Med. Teach. 2021, 43, S25–S31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Spaulding, E.M.; Marvel, F.A.; Jacob, E.; Rahman, A.; Hansen, B.R.; Hanyok, L.A.; Martin, S.S.; Han, H.-R. Interprofessional education and collaboration among healthcare students and professionals: A systematic review and call for action. J. Interprof. Care 2021, 35, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gupta, V.; Garg, R. Emerging and Re-Emerging Infections: An Overview. In Recent Advances in Pharmaceutical Innovation and Research; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 761–770. [Google Scholar]
  4. Petrelli, H.M.; Schoelles, J.L.; Cimino, L.H.; Van Amburgh, J.A. Pharmacy education, make way for GenZ. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2023, 87, 100025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Silva, R.D.O.S.; de Araújo, D.C.S.A.; Menezes, P.W.D.S.; Neves, E.R.Z.; de Lyra, D.P., Jr. Digital pharmacists: The new wave in pharmacy practice and education. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2022, 44, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heitmayer, M.; Lahlou, S. Why are smartphones disruptive? An empirical study of smartphone use in real-life contexts. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 116, 106637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maddox, T.M.; Rumsfeld, J.S.; Payne, P.R.O. Questions for artificial intelligence in health care. JAMA 2019, 321, 31–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tagami, T.; Ito, E.; Kida, R.; Hirose, K.; Noda, T.; Ozeki, T. 3D printing of gummy drug formulations composed of gelatin and an HPMC-based hydrogel for pediatric use. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 594, 120118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Najeeb, P.N.J.; Rimna, A.; Safa, K.; Silvana, M.; Adarsh, T. Pill care-the smart pill box with remind, authenticate and confirmation function. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Emerging Trends and Innovations in Engineering and Technological Research (ICETIETR), Ernakulam, India, 11–13 July 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kouijzer, M.M.T.E.; Kip, H.; Bouman, Y.H.A.; Kelders, S.M. Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: A scoping review on the implementation process of virtual reality in various healthcare settings. Implement. Sci. Commun. 2023, 4, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cantor, M.N.; Thorpe, L. Integrating data on social determinants of health into electronic health records. Health Aff. 2018, 37, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Campbell-Lendrum, D.; Neville, T.; Schweizer, C.; Neira, M. Climate change and health: Three grand challenges. Nat. Med. 2023, 29, 1631–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Woychik, R.P.; Bianchi, D.W.; Gibbons, G.H.; Glass, R.I.; Gordon, J.A.; Pérez-Stable, E.J.; Zenk, S.N. The NIH Climate Change and Health Initiative and Strategic Framework: Addressing the threat of climate change to health. Lancet 2022, 400, 1831–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Iqbal, J.; Bux, H.; Sahitia, S. Health consequences of natural disasters: An overview of recent literature on floods. Pak. J. Public Health 2023, 13, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bansal, A.; Cherbuin, N.; Davis, D.L.; Peek, M.J.; Wingett, A.; Christensen, B.K.; Carlisle, H.; Broom, M.; Schoenaker, D.A.J.M.; Dahlstrom, J.E.; et al. Heatwaves and wildfires suffocate our healthy start to life: Time to assess impact and take action. Lancet Planet. Health 2023, 7, e718–e725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mavrouli, M.; Mavroulis, S.; Lekkas, E.; Tsakris, A. Respiratory infections following earthquake-induced tsunamis: Transmission risk factors and lessons learned for disaster risk management. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mavrouli, M.; Mavroulis, S.; Lekkas, E.; Tsakris, A. The impact of earthquakes on public health: A narrative review of infectious diseases in the post-disaster period aiming to disaster risk reduction. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Masic, I. Public health aspects of global population health and well-being in the 21st century regarding determinants of health. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2018, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Robinson, H.; MacDonald, B.; Broadbent, E. The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: A review. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2014, 6, 575–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grasser, T.; Dario, A.B.; Parreira, P.D.C.S.; Correia, I.M.T.; Meziat-Filho, N. Defining Text Neck: A Scoping Review. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2024, 28, 100998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, Z.; Janarthanan, J.; Mohan, P. Understanding digital dementia and cognitive impact in the current era of the internet: A review. Cureus 2024, 16, e70029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moledina, S.; Khoja, A. Digital dementia–is smart technology making us dumb? Ochsner J. 2018, 18, 12. [Google Scholar]
  23. Quinones, C.; Griffiths, M.D. Reducing compulsive Internet use and anxiety symptoms via two brief interventions: A comparison between mindfulness and gradual muscle relaxation. J. Behav. Addict. 2019, 8, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mak, K.K.; Scheer, B.; Yeh, C.-H.; Ohno, S.; Nam, J.K. Associations of personality traits with internet addiction: A cross-cultural meta-analysis with a multilingual approach. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2021, 24, 777–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jain, P.G.; Upasani, S.V.; Patil, D.B.; Jain, N.S.; Bhandari, G.S.; Manure, S.S.; Bachhav, U.L.; Bhavsar, J.D. Screen Time Crisis: Assessing Mobile Phone Dependence Among Future Pharmacists and Its Public Health Implications. Cuest. Fisioter. 2025, 54, 6708–6717. [Google Scholar]
  26. Baishya, A.K. More dangerous than sharks: Cellspace, death, and pathologies of the selfie. Media Cult. Soc. 2025, 47, 354–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sami, S.A.; Marma, K.K.S.; Chakraborty, A.; Singha, T.; Rakib, A.; Uddin, G.; Hossain, M.K.; Uddin, S.M.N. A comprehensive review on global contributions and recognition of pharmacy professionals amidst COVID-19 pandemic: Moving from present to future. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jordan, D.; Guiu-Segura, J.M.; Sousa-Pinto, G.; Wang, L.-N. How COVID-19 has impacted the role of pharmacists around the world. Farm. Hosp. 2021, 45, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Maidment, I.; Young, E.; MacPhee, M.; Booth, A.; Zaman, H.; Breen, J.; Hilton, A.; Kelly, T.; Wong, G. Rapid realist review of the role of community pharmacy in the public health response to COVID-19. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e050043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Andrade, J.; Slaby, M.; DeAngelis, J.; Connors, J.; Truong, J.; Ciaramella, C.; DiGregorio, R. Implementation of a pharmacist-led COVID-19 vaccination clinic at a community teaching hospital. Am. J. Health Pharm. 2021, 78, 1038–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Walpola, R.L.; Issakhany, D.; Gisev, N.; Hopkins, R.E. The accessibility of pharmacist prescribing and impacts on medicines access: A systematic review. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2024, 20, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chiu, K.; Thow, A.M.; Bero, L. “Never waste a good crisis”: Opportunities and constraints from the COVID-19 pandemic on pharmacists’ scope of practice. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2022, 18, 3638–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Watson, K.E.; Schindel, T.J.; Barsoum, M.E.; Kung, J.Y. COVID the catalyst for evolving professional role identity? A scoping review of global pharmacists’ roles and services as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pharmacy 2021, 9, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hennekam, S.; Ladge, J.; Shymko, Y. From Zero to Hero: An exploratory study examining sudden hero status among non-physician health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Psychol. 2020, 105, 1088–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weir, N.; Newham, R.; Dunlop, E.; Ferguson, A.; Bennie, M. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pharmacy personnel in primary care. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 2022, 23, e56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ploylearmsang, C. Health professionalism and health profession education in the 21st century: An example of pharmacy education [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. MedEdPublish 2022, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pharmacy Automation Devices Market Size|Forecast [2032]. Available online: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/pharmacy-automation-devices-market-106938 (accessed on 18 October 2025).
  38. Elder Care Assistive Robots Market Size & Forecast to 2030. 2025. Available online: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/report/elder-care-robots-market (accessed on 18 October 2025).
  39. Social Robots Market Size, Share, Growth, and Forecast [2032]. 2024. Available online: https://www.skyquestt.com/report/social-robots-market (accessed on 18 October 2025).
  40. Mordor Intelligence. Medical Furniture Market Size, Trends, Share, Growth & Competitive Landscape 2030. Mordor Intelligence. August 2025. Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/medical-furniture-market (accessed on 18 October 2025).
  41. Faizullabhoy, M.; Wani, G. Senior Mobility Aid Devices Market Size—By Product Type (Wheelchairs, Scooters, Walking Aids, Mobility Lifts, Others), By End-User, By Price, By Distribution Channel & Global Forecast, 2024–2032, Global Market Insights Inc. 1970. Available online: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/senior-mobility-aid-devices-market (accessed on 18 October 2025).
  42. Transparency Market Research, Elderly and Disabled Assistive Devices Market. 12 January 2022. Available online: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/elderly-disabled-assistive-devices.html (accessed on 18 October 2025).
  43. Janke, K.K.; Bloom, T.J.; Boyce, E.G.; Johnson, J.L.; Kopacek, K.; O’Sullivan, T.A.; Petrelli, H.M.; Steeb, D.R.; Ross, L.J. A Pathway to Professional Identity Formation: Report of the 2020–2021 AACP Student Affairs Standing Committee. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2021, 85, 8714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lydon, E.; Scahill, S.L.; Arakawa, N.; Cox, A.; Schneider, C.R.; Hanning, S.M. Preparing pharmacists for disaster management and practice: Protocol for a scoping review with a participatory approach. BMJ Open 2025, 15, e093033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Trede, F. The role of work-integrated learning to develop professionalism and professional identity. Asia-Pac. J. Coop. Educ. 2012, 13, 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  46. Romli, M.H.; Yunus, F.W.; Adam, S.K.; Salihan, S. How Are Alternative Clinical Placements Performed Compared to Traditional Clinical Placements During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Sought Through a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med. Sci. Educ. 2024, 34, 927–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Strawbridge, J.; Hayden, J.C.; Robson, T.; Flood, M.; Cullinan, S.; Lynch, M.; Morgan, A.T.; O’BRien, F.; Reynolds, R.; Kerrigan, S.W.; et al. Educating pharmacy students through a pandemic: Reflecting on our COVID-19 experience. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2022, 18, 3204–3209. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nair, M.A.; Muthu, P.; Abuijlan, I.A.M. The Effectiveness of High-Fidelity Simulation on Clinical Competence Among Nursing Students. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024, 10. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Geoghegan, L.M.; Papadopoulos, D.; Petrie, N.F.; Teo, I.F.; Papavasiliou, T. Utilization of a 3D Printed Simulation Training Model to Improve Microsurgical Training. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2023, 11, e4898. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/2023/04000/utilization_of_a_3d_printed_simulation_training.6.aspx (accessed on 3 June 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sharma, K.A.; Murry, L.L.; Bharti, J.; Kaur, R.; Meena, J.; Kulshrestha, V.; Mansoor, S.; Soni, S.; Kumar, S. Blended Teaching Methodology of E-learning and Simulation Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology for Undergraduate Medical and Nursing Trainees. Cureus 2023, 15, e40062. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Artioli, G.; Deiana, L.; De Vincenzo, F.; Raucci, M.; Amaducci, G.; Bassi, M.C.; Di Leo, S.; Hayter, M.; Ghirotto, L. Health professionals and students’ experiences of reflective writing in learning: A qualitative meta-synthesis. BMC Med. Educ. 2021, 21, 394. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Engelbertink, M.M.; Colomer, J.; Mittendorff, K.M.W.; Alsina, Á.; Kelders, S.M.; Ayllón, S.; Westerhof, G.J. The reflection level and the construction of professional identity of university students. Reflective Pract. 2021, 22, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rath, A. Enhancing professional identity formation in health professions: A multi-layered framework for educational and reflective practice. Med. Teach. 2025, 47, 943–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wentzer, H.; Hogsgaard, D. Assessing Video-based Cross-sectorial Virtual Conferencing—A case study of third space learning between different contexts of care for the complex patient. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Integrated Care Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium, 22–24 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
  55. Reeves, S.; Pelone, F.; Harrison, R.; Goldman, J.; Zwarenstein, M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 6, Cd000072. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hood, K.; Cant, R.; Baulch, J.; Gilbee, A.; Leech, M.; Anderson, A.; Davies, K. Prior experience of interprofessional learning enhances undergraduate nursing and healthcare students’ professional identity and attitudes to teamwork. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2014, 14, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. El-Sherif, D.M.; Abouzid, M.; Elzarif, M.T.; Ahmed, A.A.; Albakri, A.; Alshehri, M.M. Telehealth and Artificial Intelligence insights into healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare 2022, 10, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. McKimm, I.; Ramani, S.; Kusurkar, R.A.; Fornari, A.; Nadarajah, V.D.; Thampy, H.; Filipe, H.P.; Kachur, E.K.; Hays, R. Capturing the wisdom of the crowd: Health professions’ educators meet at a virtual world café. Perspect. Med. Educ. 2020, 9, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kizuna, Official Magazine, The Government of Japan. Promoting the Bosai Spirit of Tohoku to Create a Better, Safer World. Government of Japan. Available online: https://www.japan.go.jp/kizuna/2023/01/promoting_the_bosai_spirit.html (accessed on 14 June 2024).
  60. Huss, N.; Ikiugu, M.N.; Hackett, F.; Sheffield, P.E.; Palipane, N.; Groome, J. Education for sustainable health care: From learning to professional practice. Med. Teach. 2020, 42, 1097–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Levett-Jones, T.; Catling, C.; Cheer, S.; Fields, L.; Foster, A.; Maguire, J.; Mcintyre, E.; Oam, T.M.; Pich, J.; Pitt, V.; et al. Achieving consensus on the essential knowledge and skills needed by nursing students to promote planetary health and sustainable healthcare: A Delphi study. J. Adv. Nurs. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. López-Urias, C.; Vazquez-Becerra, G.; Nayak, K.; López-Montes, R. Analysis of ionospheric disturbances during x-class solar flares (2021–2022) using GNSS data and wavelet analysis. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. George, A. When Trust Fails: Examining Systemic Risk in the Digital Economy from the 2024 CrowdStrike Outage. Partn. Univers. Multidiscip. Res. J. 2024, 1, 134–152. [Google Scholar]
  64. Bernacki, K.; Keister, A.; Sapiro, N.; Joo, J.S.; Mattle, L. Impact of COVID-19 on patient and healthcare professional attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors toward the healthcare system and on the dynamics of the healthcare pathway. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021, 21, 1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, K.; Wu, S.; Xu, Y.; Cao, W.; Goetz, T.; Parks-Stamm, E.J. Adaptability Promotes Student Engagement Under COVID-19: The Multiple Mediating Effects of Academic Emotion. Front. Psychol. 2021, 11, 633265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Besser, A.; Flett, G.L.; Zeigler-Hill, V. Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Understanding the challenges for students. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. Psychol. 2020, 8, 85–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lykes, V.A.; Kemmelmeier, M. What predicts loneliness? Cultural difference between individualistic and collectivistic societies in Europe. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2014, 45, 468–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Oyserman, D.; Uskul, A.K. Individualism and collectivism: Societal-level processes with implications for individual-level and society-level outcomes. In Multilevel Analysis of Individuals and Cultures; Psychology Press: East Sussex, UK, 2015; pp. 145–173. [Google Scholar]
  69. Törnqvist, M. Living alone together: Individualized collectivism in Swedish communal housing. Sociology 2019, 53, 900–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Esterwood, E.; Saeed, S.A. Past epidemics, natural disasters, COVID19, and mental health: Learning from history as we deal with the present and prepare for the future. Psychiatr. Q. 2020, 91, 1121–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Muttarak, R.; Lutz, W. Is education a key to reducing vulnerability to natural disasters and hence unavoidable climate change? Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Onuma, H.; Shin, K.J.; Managi, S. Household preparedness for natural disasters: Impact of disaster experience and implications for future disaster risks in Japan. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017, 21, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bendavid, E.; Boerma, T.; Akseer, N.; Langer, A.; Malembaka, E.B.; Okiro, E.A.; Wise, P.H.; Heft-Neal, S.; Black, R.E.; Bhutta, Z.A.; et al. The effects of armed conflict on the health of women and children. Lancet 2021, 397, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Musisi, S.; Kinyanda, E. Long-term impact of war, civil war, and persecution in civilian populations—Conflict and post-traumatic stress in African communities. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 478377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gostin, L.O.; Moon, S.; Meier, B.M. Reimagining Global Health Governance in the Age of COVID-19; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2020; Volume 110, pp. 1615–1619. [Google Scholar]
  76. Simpson, M.; Swist, T. Curating work-integrated learning: Taking care of disciplinary heritage: Local institutional contexts and wellbeing via the open educational resources movement. Asia-Pac. J. Coop. Educ. 2016, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Emerging health support technologies.
Table 1. Emerging health support technologies.
TechnologyPurposePredicted Value
Dispensing robotsAutomate medicine distribution, sorting, packaging, counting, and dispensingUS$3.47 billion in 2025 [37]
Personal care robotsAct as socially assistive companions, functional mobility aids, and remote health monitoring unitsUS$3.1 billion in 2024 [38]
Social contact robotsProvide non-judgmental companionship and emotional support to reduce social anxiety and aid individuals with depression, anxiety, or cognitive disorders; used in schools, therapy clinics, and home settingsUS$5.9 billion in 2023 [39]
Health-modified furnitureDesigned for healthcare environments with antimicrobial materials, modular features, and monitoring systems to enhance patient safety and caregiver efficiency (e.g., smart beds, modular carts, antimicrobial work surfaces).US$50.41 billion in 2025 [40]
Mobility aidsSupport individuals with limited movement or physical impairments to maintain independence and stability during daily activities.US$10.4 billion in 2024 [41]
Assistive devicesImprove health and well-being of older adults or those with physical, sensory, or cognitive impairments by enhancing mobility, communication, and daily functioning (e.g., smart canes, AI hearing aids, speech-enabled wheelchairs, home monitoring systems).US$24.2 billion in 2024 [42]
Table 2. Examples of professional development activities included in curricula.
Table 2. Examples of professional development activities included in curricula.
InterventionRole in Professional Identity DevelopmentUse/Adaptability During COVID
High fidelity simulation including VRThe use of high-fidelity mannequins, virtual reality, or cloud-based dispensing or prescribing software can be considered as alternatives to experiential learning in an online environment [46,47].
These learning modalities can be tailored to fit the needs of learners. For instance, high-fidelity mannequins with injection inserts or simpler early learning tools like oranges have been shown to provide safe opportunities to develop effective professional skills [48].
Konjac models supplemented by video assessment have been reported to develop and maintain microsurgery skills [49]. Whilst pharmacists are not engaged in surgery, konjac models may be a possibility for use in pharmacy education as models for identifying simple injuries such as burns or skin infections.
Simulation may be supported by e-Learning during situations such as COVID-19 or as a learning modality incorporated across campuses or teaching sites such as lecture theatres or hospital wards [50].
Reflective writingCan serve many purposes at different course levels for health professional students, for example, it may offer students the opportunity to reflect on mistakes of judgement which occurred under supervision, a chance to celebrate successes, identify useful coping strategies, and crucially to examine anxieties that were established to be baseless [51].
Towards the final years, as students’ capabilities develop further, reflective writing and its lessons can be shared for group discussions and peer-to-peer learning once a safe space has been declared and implemented [51].
It is an activity often identified as central to higher education generally and to health professionals’ education as essential in areas of self-esteem, appropriate future focus, concept of professional practice and self-perception of tasks, having a perception [52].
A sustainable and equitable modality, irrespective of resource level (richer or poorer), that enabled students to continue fostering that blending of societal, educational, and personal influences to ensure that professional identity development continued [53].
Interprofessional virtual case studies/debates/vignettesInterprofessional activities may be situated in a common patient case(s) involving a small number of health profession students to simulate an interprofessional team. These sessions can be held face to face, across campuses and across nations, facilitated by videoconferencing [54].
This learning activity is identified as building collaboration skills, clarifying professional roles and boundaries, and may slightly enhance patient functional outcomes [55].
Although adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic, it had been used before and since, with earlier experiences identifying that prior exposure to interprofessional activities contributes to professional identity development and teamwork [56].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simpson, M.D.; Jose, J.; Cox, J.L. Healthcare Practice Post COVID-19 Impacts: Will 21st Century Pharmacists Become Global, Agile, Collaborative and Curated? Pharmacy 2025, 13, 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13060162

AMA Style

Simpson MD, Jose J, Cox JL. Healthcare Practice Post COVID-19 Impacts: Will 21st Century Pharmacists Become Global, Agile, Collaborative and Curated? Pharmacy. 2025; 13(6):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13060162

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simpson, Maree Donna, Jaimy Jose, and Jennifer L. Cox. 2025. "Healthcare Practice Post COVID-19 Impacts: Will 21st Century Pharmacists Become Global, Agile, Collaborative and Curated?" Pharmacy 13, no. 6: 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13060162

APA Style

Simpson, M. D., Jose, J., & Cox, J. L. (2025). Healthcare Practice Post COVID-19 Impacts: Will 21st Century Pharmacists Become Global, Agile, Collaborative and Curated? Pharmacy, 13(6), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13060162

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop