Next Article in Journal
Visual Search and Conflict Mitigation Strategies Used by Expert en Route Air Traffic Controllers
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Clarification of Stable Ignition Region for HKP110 Green Hypergolic Bipropellant
Previous Article in Journal
Online Model-Based Remaining-Useful-Life Prognostics for Aircraft Cooling Units Using Time-Warping Degradation Clustering
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Modular Impulsive Green Monopropellant Propulsion System (MIMPS-G): For CubeSats in LEO and to the Moon

Aerospace 2021, 8(6), 169; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8060169
by Ahmed E. S. Nosseir 1,2,*, Angelo Cervone 1,* and Angelo Pasini 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Aerospace 2021, 8(6), 169; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8060169
Submission received: 12 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 17 June 2021 / Published: 19 June 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see report attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your intensive review and clear comments.

Please find attached our response.

Best Regards,

The Authors

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This work describes the design of a green energetic ionic liquid propulsion system for small satellites (MIMPS-G500mN).  There are really three different topics covered in this work: (1) the MIMPS design including the design rationale and process and flow chart, (2) a review of energetic ionic liquid propellants, and (3) a review of existing green propellant small sat propulsion thrusters/systems.  All 3 topics are quite relevant and timely given the community interest and research activities. If this reviewer can make a suggestion, I think ideally, the work would be broken up into two manuscripts: (1) MIMPS propulsion system design, followed by testing, and test results, actual experimental measurements and comparison with the design prediction; (2) Review of existing green EILs/propellants and the thrusters/systems that use them.   While this would be an improvement I believe, the manuscript as written makes a new and important contribution and can be published.

Specific comments:
FIG 6 reminded this reviewer of another recent article he read about operating multiple thruster types from one propellant tank (in your case, vapor auxiliary thrusters (which could be heated resistojet or warm gas thruster) and a chemical monoprop thruster): "Rovey, J. L., Lyne, C. T., Mundahl, A. J., Rasmont, N., Glascock, M. S., Wainwright, M. J., Berg, S. P., "Review of multimode space propulsion," Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 118, pp. 100627, 2020.", which also discusses how emerging EILs can be used for multimode propulsion.

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your intensive review and clear comments.

Please find attached our response.

Best Regards,

The Authors

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop