Next Article in Journal
Design Space Exploration of a Jet Engine Component Using a Combined Object Model for Function and Geometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Energy Transition in Aviation: The Role of Cryogenic Fuels
Previous Article in Journal
Using Convolutional Neural Networks to Automate Aircraft Maintenance Visual Inspection
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Contrail Mitigation Potential of Aircraft Formation Flight Derived from High-Resolution Simulations
Open AccessArticle

Assessing the Climate Impact of Formation Flights

1
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, 82234 Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
2
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 Delft, The Netherlands
3
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Air Transportation Systems, 21079 Hamburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2020, 7(12), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7120172
Received: 22 October 2020 / Revised: 27 November 2020 / Accepted: 5 December 2020 / Published: 8 December 2020
An operational measure that is inspired by migrant birds aiming toward the mitigation of aviation climate impact is to fly in aerodynamic formation. When this operational measure is adapted to commercial aircraft it saves fuel and is, therefore, expected to reduce the climate impact of aviation. Besides the total emission amount, this mitigation option also changes the location of emissions, impacting the non-CO2 climate effects arising from NOx and H2O emissions and contrails. Here, we assess these non-CO2 climate impacts with a climate response model to assure a benefit for climate not only due to CO2 emission reductions, but also due to reduced non-CO2 effects. Therefore, the climate response model AirClim is used, which includes CO2 effects and also the impact of water vapor and contrail induced cloudiness as well as the impact of nitrogen dioxide emissions on the ozone and methane concentration. For this purpose, AirClim has been adopted to account for saturation effects occurring for formation flight. The results of the case studies show that the implementation of formation flights in the 50 most popular airports for the year 2017 display an average decrease of fuel consumption by 5%. The climate impact, in terms of average near surface temperature change, is estimated to be reduced in average by 24%, with values of individual formations between 13% and 33%. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate impact; aviation; formation flight; mitigation potential; aircraft wake-surfing for efficiency climate impact; aviation; formation flight; mitigation potential; aircraft wake-surfing for efficiency
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Dahlmann, K.; Matthes, S.; Yamashita, H.; Unterstrasser, S.; Grewe, V.; Marks, T. Assessing the Climate Impact of Formation Flights. Aerospace 2020, 7, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7120172

AMA Style

Dahlmann K, Matthes S, Yamashita H, Unterstrasser S, Grewe V, Marks T. Assessing the Climate Impact of Formation Flights. Aerospace. 2020; 7(12):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7120172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dahlmann, Katrin; Matthes, Sigrun; Yamashita, Hiroshi; Unterstrasser, Simon; Grewe, Volker; Marks, Tobias. 2020. "Assessing the Climate Impact of Formation Flights" Aerospace 7, no. 12: 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7120172

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop