Next Article in Journal
A Review of Recent Developments in Hybrid Rocket Propulsion and Its Applications
Previous Article in Journal
The Aerodynamic Performance of a Novel Overlapping Octocopter in Hover
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Lightweight 6 m Deployable Mesh Reflector Antenna Mechanisms Based on a Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy

1
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, 76 Hanggongdaehak-ro, Deogyang-gu, Goyang-si 10540, Republic of Korea
2
STEP Lab. Ltd., 43 Bogyongdong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34202, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2024, 11(9), 738; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11090738
Submission received: 5 June 2024 / Revised: 4 August 2024 / Accepted: 5 September 2024 / Published: 9 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Astronautics & Space Science)

Abstract

:
This paper describes the design and experimental verification of a 6 m parabolic deployable mesh reflector antenna mechanism based on a superelastic shape memory alloy. This antenna mainly consists of a deployable primary reflector with a superelastic shape memory alloy-based hinge mechanism and a fixed-type secondary reflector mast, where a rotary-type holding and release mechanism and deployment speed control system are installed. The main feature of this antenna is the application of a superelastic shape memory alloy to the mechanism, which has the advantages of plastic deformation resistance, high damping, and fatigue resistance. A shape memory alloy is applied to the hinge mechanism of each primary reflector rib and to the rotary-type holding and release mechanism as a deployment mechanism. In addition, a superelastic shape memory alloy wire is applied to the antenna in the circumferential direction to maintain the curvature of the primary reflector. The effectiveness of the proposed mechanism design was verified through repeated deployment tests on models of the superelastic shape memory alloy-based hinge mechanism and the antenna system.

1. Introduction

Recently, the space industry has been focusing on the mass-production system technology of small satellites with a relatively low risk of mission failure owing to the advantages of low cost, short-term development and operation compared with the existing small production systems of medium and large satellites with high performance and capabilities under the New Space paradigm [1]. As a result, missions that are difficult to achieve with conventional medium and large satellite operations, such as quasi-real-time Earth observations and the establishment of a global Internet service network, are being conducted using constellations of small satellites [2]. Based on the development of space technology and previously researched technology for developing small satellites, the missions utilizing them are being advanced and diversified, and the application of high-performance large-scale antennas is essential for performing advanced missions such as synthetic aperture radar (SAR), high-speed communication, and signal intelligence (SIGINT) missions. However, because of the limited weight and internal volume requirements of launch vehicles, large-scale antennas must be designed based on the concept of deployable structures [3]. Consequently, large-scale deployable mesh antenna technology is in the spotlight with advantages such as high gain, ultralight weight, and high packaging efficiency.
Deployable antennas are stowed to satisfy volume requirements and ensure structural safety under launch conditions; subsequently, they are deployed to perform on-orbit space missions. The deployment mechanism of mesh reflector antennas is particularly important because of the characteristics of the mesh that constitutes the reflecting surface. The mesh applied to the antennas utilizes wires fabricated from metallic materials, such as molybdenum and tungsten, to maintain the precision of the reflecting surface during orbital operation. These materials have low elongation and high strength compared with general textile materials [4,5]. However, despite the application of metallic wires, the mesh has a low stiffness and deforms easily, causing problems such as variations in the mesh opening per inch (OPI), surface curvature distortion, and tearing of the mesh when excessive deformation occurs during orbital deployment. Because physical changes in the reflecting surface directly affect the antenna performance, the deployment mechanism should be designed considering mesh characteristics.
As representative large-scale deployable mesh antennas, parabolic reflectors have been used in space applications, and several studies have been conducted. Hasanzade et al. [6] proposed a compact and spatially deployable hinged-rib umbrella antenna. Each rib of the proposed antenna contains five beams and two connectors, and a total of six ribs are deployed as one actuator to achieve lightness of the mechanism and high storage efficiency. Lopatin et al. [7] proposed a deployment mechanism for a mesh antenna that utilizes the elastic strain energy of a composite tube generated in a folded rim in its stowed configuration. The rim was designed as a composite thin-walled toroidal shell with cut-outs. By applying three elastic hinges between each spoke and attaching them directly to the spoke, a lower resistance moment can be obtained compared with the deployment method utilizing a cable network. A 4 m antenna consisting of 16 carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) spokes was designed to validate the proposed mechanism. The design parameters with minimum rim mass were derived using mathematical calculations and deployment simulations, and the design validity was demonstrated by showing that the deployment moment was twice the resistance moment. Chahat et al. [8] proposed a Ka-band mesh antenna that can be stowed in a 1.5 U size for application on a 6 U CubeSat. A deployable mesh reflector was constructed using 30 ribs to achieve the target radiofrequency (RF) performance. The deployment mechanism utilizes the strain energy of springs. The selected spring produces 290 N of force when fully deployed and over 1000 N of force when stowed. Each hinge has a deployment limiter to minimize surface error, which can degrade the antenna RF performance. Urata et al. [9] proposed a wrapped-rib type deployable parabolic mesh antenna for application in small SAR satellites in the 150 kg class. A total of 24 ribs, which are parabolic strips cut from a spring steel plate, are stowed around a central hub and then deployed based on the resilience of the ribs themselves. In mesh antennas, the shape of the reflection surface should be maintained as it is stowed and deployed to ensure the desired performance. As suggested in previous studies, research on various deployment mechanisms aimed at achieving antenna design objectives and considering the mesh characteristics is being actively conducted.
To achieve the various design objectives of the deployment mechanism, such as implementing reflector curvature, being lightweight, and simplifying mechanical systems, we focused on the superelastic effect of a shape memory alloy (SMA). SMAs have unique characteristics that depend on the phase-transformation temperature. The superelastic effect occurs when the operating environment temperature of an SMA exceeds the austenite finish temperature. Owing to the superelastic effect, they recover to their original shape without residual stress when the mechanical load is removed. Therefore, they exhibit much higher plastic deformation resistance than general metallic materials. In addition, they experience different loading paths that dissipate strain energy during loading and unloading, leading to high damping and fatigue durability [10,11,12]. Superelastic SMA materials, with their attractive features, have been widely utilized in space applications such as gear wheels to enhance the micro-jitter isolation capability, launch vibration isolation systems, and solar array yokes designed to ensure high damping performance [13,14,15,16]. To date, regarding the deployable mesh antennas, only the study of Lim et al. [17] has been presented implementing a 2 m diameter deployable mesh reflector antenna that utilizes the superelastic SMA and the hysteresis effect of a composite tape spring hinge. It has 24 primary reflector ribs, each fabricated from an SMA in the form of a rod. It is a hingeless passive-deployment mechanism that deploys with resilience owing to the superelastic effect, thus gaining advantages in terms of reliability and light weight. The secondary reflector is a two-stage deployment type with a tape spring hinge to maximize the storage efficiency and achieve an energy-dissipation capacity owing to the hysteresis characteristic when deployed. In the deployment test of the primary reflector deployment mechanism, an aluminum rib of the same size was plastically deformed, but the SMA rib recovered to its original shape. In addition, the free-vibration response of the SMA rib rapidly decreased owing to the high damping performance of the superelastic SMA after deployment. The above results shows that the application of a superelastic SMA in a deployable mesh antenna effectively ensures stable deployment. However, since the entire rib is a hingeless type composed of SMA rods, it can only be stowed in the range within the allowable maximum strain of SMA material, limiting the ability to reduce the packaging volume when the antenna size increases.
Nevertheless, the superelasticity of the SMA is a unique characteristic that makes it highly attractive for use in spaceborne antenna mechanisms, as mentioned above. Therefore, to implement larger-sized antenna mechanisms based on the superelasticity of the SMA material, a novel design strategy for the antenna deployment mechanism is essential, utilizing a different stowage and deployment concept for the primary reflector within the allowable strain of the SMA. This is a starting point of this study. In this paper, a superelastic SMA-based antenna mechanism is proposed for application to a 6 m deployable mesh reflector antenna. The stowage and deployment concept of the mesh antenna is established based on the specified condition that a single small satellite with the stowed antenna is loaded and launched by a small-class launch vehicle. This antenna mainly consists of deployable primary reflector with a superelastic SMA-based hinge mechanism and a fixed-type secondary reflector mast, where the rotary-type holding and release mechanism (HRM) is placed to release all ribs simultaneously by rotating in the in-plane direction when deployment initiates. In addition, rotary dampers are installed to control the deployment speed by connecting each rib to a wire. The SMA is applied to the hinge mechanism of each primary reflector rib and the rotary-type HRM as the deployment mechanism. The main feature of these mechanisms is utilization of the plate shape superelastic SMA. The shape of the SMA plate has the advantages of manufacturability, which make it easy to change the deployment torque created by the bent plate in stowed state by simply modifying the length, width, and thickness of the plate. Additionally, the hinge mechanism is simplified than the antennas using conventional hinges as it functions as a mechanical guide along the deployment direction of ribs owing to the high in-plane stiffness implemented by the shape of the SMA plate. This type of hinge mechanism made by SMA plate is firstly developed for the antenna mechanism in this study. In addition, considering the allowable maximum strain of the SMA material, feasible stowage and deployment angles for the rib segments were determined. Our strategy to accomplish this involves designing the secondary reflector mast to be fixed, and find the best height from the antenna base. The fixed-type secondary reflector mast makes it easier to secure dimensional accuracy compared to a deployable-type mast and is more reliable because no additional mechanism is required to release and deploy the reflector mast. Furthermore, by applying a superelastic SMA wire to the antenna in the circumferential direction, the curvature of the primary reflector is maintained without plastic deformation, even for large deformations, owing to the stowed and deployed configurations. We performed a repeated deployment test on a specimen of the superelastic SMA-based hinge mechanism to verify its feasibility. The effectiveness of the proposed mechanism design was verified through a repeated deployment test of the antenna system and a comparison of the reflection surface root mean square (RMS) error measurements before and after these tests. In addition, the space mission applicability of the antenna with the proposed mechanism was evaluated by calculating the expected antenna gain using the surface RMS error data obtained from repeated deployment tests.

2. Design of the Deployable Mesh Reflector Antenna Based on a Superelastic SMA

2.1. Superelastic Effect of an SMA

Figure 1 shows the characteristics of an SMA according to the phase transformation. The SMA exists in austenite and martensite phases depending on the temperature and stress, and it generally exhibit two major mechanical properties. These properties are classified into the shape memory and superelastic effects, depending on the correlation between the operating environment temperature ( T ) and austenite finish temperature ( A f ), which is a specific initially set temperature. The superelastic effect has the advantage of being resistant to plastic deformation, even if the strain reaches 8–15%, owing to the external mechanical force when T is higher than A f . In addition, when a load exceeding the critical stress point is applied, a phase change occurs from the austenite phase to the martensite phase, and the SMA exhibits hysteresis. The area inside the hysteresis curve represents the amount of energy dissipation of the material per cycle during loading and unloading, which means that the superelastic SMA can achieve a high damping performance [10,11,12]. In this paper, we propose an antenna mechanism that utilizes the advantages of the aforementioned superelastic SMA. The superelastic SMA applied in the proposed mechanism has A f of 15 °C considering ground testing, and the material properties are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Antenna Design Overview

Figure 2 shows the stowage concept of a deployable mesh antenna to which the proposed mechanisms are applied. The stowage volume of the antenna was designed based on the space inside the fairing of Antares 233 (Northrop Grumman Corporation, West Falls Church, VA, USA) [19], a representative launch vehicle for small satellites. The folding angle of the hinge was selected accordingly. This concept was selected to verify the proposed mechanisms and is suitable for antenna design for small satellite applications. Figure 3 shows the stowed and deployed configurations of the proposed mesh antenna. In the antenna reflection surface design process, the mesh area between each rib exhibits straightness because of the absence of constraints. Deformation of the reflection surface causes variations in the signal path length from the feeder to the reflection surface. An optimized number of ribs should be selected to mitigate the performance degradation in the antenna caused by this effect. To achieve the target performance of the proposed antenna, we selected 28 ribs as the optimal number. However, applying a deployable rib with three revolute hinges featuring a folding angle of 90° or more would result in an excessive increase in the area of the base plate, which is the interface for rib fastening. This increase in the area of the base plate increases mass and contributes to the degradation of the radio wave characteristics of the antenna by reducing the reflection surface area. To solve this problem, the primary reflector of this antenna comprises 28 deployable ribs with two revolute joints to optimize the base plate area. Moreover, a CFRP is used to ensure a high rigidity and lightness of the rib. The reflection surface of the primary reflector is composed of a silver-coated Teflon mesh to achieve the mechanical properties and not for space applications. It is fixed to the front of the primary reflector ribs to form a reflection surface when deployed. The secondary reflector mast has a support structure composed of honeycomb sandwich panels and CFRP struts. At the top of the mast, a rotary-type HRM is implemented for the stowage and deployment of the primary reflector ribs, and four rotary dampers are installed to control the deployment speed. The curvature of the primary reflector is preserved by integrating SMA wires at both the tips and centers of the ribs in the circumferential direction of the antenna. Furthermore, the SMA wires and a pin-puller-based launch lock device are applied to the exterior of the primary reflector ribs in the stowed condition to minimize the behavior of the ribs under launch vibration environments.
The packaging efficiency ( η V ) is an important parameter of the deployable antenna structure. It is calculated as the ratio of the antenna structure volume when stowed ( V s ) and deployed ( V d ), and is expressed as Equation (1). When calculating packaging efficiency, the volume of the bounding box of the antenna structure is calculated according to the length and height, as shown in Figure 4.
η v = V d V S
The length and height of the bounding box are L d and h d , respectively, in the deployed configuration and L s and h s , respectively, in the stowed configuration. The length packaging efficiency ( η L ) and height packaging efficiency ( η h ) are defined as Equations (2) and (3).
η L = L d L S
η h = h d h S
As the proposed mesh antenna is applied a fixed-type secondary reflector mast, the packaging efficiencies for height and length are 1 and 2.56, respectively. The overall volume packaging efficiency is calculated as 6.58. Table 2 lists the packaging efficiency of each stowage method for previously studied deployable mesh antennas. The stowage concept of launching a single small satellite inside a small-launch vehicle fairing has a lower packaging efficiency than previously studied deployable mesh antennas. However, this approach increases the deployment reliability by reducing the torque requirement for deployment with a low folding angle, and each joint can be externally controlled, making it easy to stow and deploy repeatedly during ground testing.

2.3. Design of Superelastic SMA-Based Antenna Mechanisms

Figure 5 shows the stowed and deployed configurations of the proposed superelastic SMA-based hinge for the primary reflector rib. The primary reflector rib is composed of rigid, first, and second ribs and the proposed hinge mechanism. The hinge mechanism uses four SMA plates, utilizing the resilience generated by the superelastic effect. Each plate is mounted using a distinct interface bracket attached to the ribs. To minimize the friction during rotation, the rotating component is manufactured from Delrin, and the center of each component is connected to a pin to prevent out-of-plane deviations. Rotating components with different gaps are assembled in a loose fit to limit the folding angle and create the curvature of the primary reflector. The folding angles of the hinges of the first and second ribs were designed to be 68° and 43°, respectively, according to the stowage concept. In addition, this angle range ensures the structural safety of the SMA plates.
Figure 6 shows the deployment procedure of the primary reflector, which occurs in four steps in the following order: release of the launch lock device, release of the rotary-type HRM, simultaneous deployment of the first and second ribs, and final completion of deployment. During deployment, the rotary-type HRM operates through the resilience generated by the superelastic effect of the three SMA plates. The pin-puller mechanism provides a rotational constraint force in the launch vibration environment, and the resilience of the SMA causes the circular plate to rotate in-plane, thereby releasing the constraints on the primary reflector ribs during deployment. The operational configuration of the rotary-type HRM is shown in Figure 7. In addition, four rotary dampers are placed on top of the secondary reflector to minimize the latch shock during deployment, and each damper is connected to seven ribs with a nylon wire to control the deployment speed. The curvature of the primary reflector is preserved when deployed through the tension of the SMA wires integrated at both the tips and centers of the ribs and aligned in the circumferential direction of the antenna. The application of superelastic SMA wires offers an advantage as it enables stowage and deployment without plastic deformation, even under large deformations caused by a reduction in the distance between the ribs during stowage.
The proposed antenna mechanism can be deployed without plastic deformation, even under large deformations that occur during the stowed condition, by applying a superelastic SMA. This mechanism can achieve high damping characteristics through phase transformation of the SMA when deployed from a stowed condition that exhibits strain beyond the critical stress point. This significantly reduces the performance of the residual vibrations that occur immediately after deployment. Additionally, the high in-plane stiffness characteristics of the plate shape can act as a guiding mechanism for the deployment direction of the ribs. Furthermore, if a change in the deployment torque is required, adjustments can be easily made by modifying the length, thickness, and width of the plate, thereby offering high adaptability.

2.4. Design of the Secondary Reflector Mast

Figure 8 shows the mechanical configuration of the secondary reflector mast. It is composed of a secondary reflector plate and a support structure. A rotary-type HRM and four rotary dampers are placed at the top of the mast. The support structure is a fixed-type structure using struts and offers higher rigidity than the deployable structure, thereby improving the antenna pointing performance. The absence of a separate deployment mechanism contributes to the simplification of the system. The support plates have a honeycomb sandwich structure, and the facesheet is created from CFRP along with a strut to achieve a high rigidity and lightweight.

2.5. Mesh Fastening Technique

Figure 9 shows the mesh-fastening technique applied in this study, which involves placing a mesh in front of the rib and then clamping a thin plate onto the mesh surface. A push-button rivet is used to fix the thin plate during clamping, thereby easing the fastening process. The thin plate is manufactured from CFRP, identical to the material used for the primary reflector ribs, to prevent impact on the radio wave characteristics, and 62 push-button rivets are applied to each rib. This mesh fastening technique is effective in preventing tearing of the mesh and maintaining the curvature because it can fix a large area compared with the commonly applied technique of stitching the mesh to the rib itself. In addition, the high fastening force prevents slip between the antenna structure and the mesh, and it maintains the OPI of the mesh.

3. Specimen-Level Deployment Test of the Superelastic SMA-Based Hinge Mechanism

To verify the feasibility of the proposed superelastic SMA-based hinge mechanism, we performed a repeated deployment test was performed at room temperature. Figure 10 shows the setup of the repeated deployment test. The test setup consisted of a specimen of the superelastic SMA-based hinge mechanism, an acceleration sensor, and a laser displacement sensor. To facilitate a laboratory testing environment, we simplified the setup using a second rib shorter than the first rib. The primary focus of the deployment test, the hinge mechanism, was created from materials identical to those used in actual applications, including Al-6061, Delrin, and SMA. The rib was manufactured as a dummy capable of simulating mechanical characteristics by applying a generic plastic material instead of CFRP. An acceleration sensor was attached to the tip of the rib to measure the latch shock when deployed. The laser displacement sensor measured the change in position resulting from repeated deployments based on the deployment configuration of the rib. The data were used to determine whether the SMA plates underwent plastic deformation. Each deployment test was configured for deployment under the same stowage conditions using a pin fixation method. In the test setup, which excluded the 0 g device and hinge pin connecting each hinge component, the rotating part experienced torsion owing to its own weight. Consequently, the test was performed in the worst-case scenario, resulting in high friction compared with actual antenna applications. In addition, the maximum deflection of the rib specimen due to torsion was measured at 1.8 mm, which was used to establish the initial position requirements for the SMA plate at the point of complete deployment during the tests.
Three SMA plate specimens with thicknesses of 0.8 mm (Case 1), 1.2 mm (Case 2), and 1.6 mm (Case 3) were manufactured, and deployment tests were performed for each specimen. The number of repetitions for each case was selected as 30 based on the rules of the European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS) [23]. Figure 11 shows the latch shock measurement results for Cases 1 and 3. As the thickness of the SMA plate specimens increased, a higher resilience was exerted, resulting in latch shock of 15.69 g for Case 1, 18.04 g for Case 2, and 23.79 g for Case 3. However, the damping ratios calculated for each case based on the acquired acceleration responses were 0.12, 0.202, and 0.209, respectively, demonstrating that the damping ratio increased with the specimen thickness. This represents the damping characteristics obtained owing to the energy dissipation by the superelastic effect that occurs as the SMA plate recovers to its original shape under unloading at displacements exceeding the critical stress point. This is considered effective in reducing residual vibrations immediately after deployment. Figure 12 shows the results of the repeated deployment tests. In Cases 2 and 3, the plastic deformation of the specimens occurred during the fourteenth and seventh deployment tests, respectively, as the initial displacement exceeded 1.8 mm. However, in Case 1, the specimen recovered to its original shape without plastic deformation after 30 repeated tests. The visual inspection results were consistent with the initial displacement measurement results: Case 1 exhibited no plastic deformation, whereas Cases 2 and 3 experienced deformations of approximately 5° and 10°, respectively. This indicated that an increase in the thickness of the specimens leads to a higher stress on the plate under the same deformation, which was considered to have caused the plastic deformation in Cases 2 and 3. The repeated deployment test results verified that the proposed mechanism had a relatively low latch shock, and its feasibility was secured when applying Case 1, which satisfied the requirements of repeated deployment.
A deployment analysis was performed to evaluate the reduction performance of the latch shock based on the energy dissipation caused by the hysteresis characteristics of the proposed hinge mechanism. Table 3 lists the results of the deployment analysis with and without hysteresis. The analytical model was implemented under the same conditions as the test setup for Case 1 and was validated through repeated deployment testing. The area inside the hysteresis curve, represented on the strain ( ε )–stress ( σ ) plot derived from the analysis applying the mechanical properties of the superelastic SMA, was calculated using Equation (4). This area signifies the energy dissipation ( W ) during the deployment process, which was calculated to be 8.7 J/m3.
W = 0 ε σ d ε
The results of the deployment analysis indicated that a latch shock of 15.7 g was generated when the hysteresis characteristic was applied, which was similar to the test results. In contrast, a higher latch shock (52.4 g) was observed when the hysteresis characteristics were not applied, which was an increase of 3.3 times. The analysis conclusively demonstrated that the proposed mechanism can achieve high damping characteristics that are unattainable with conventional metallic materials. Consequently, the superelastic SMA-based mechanism effectively reduces latch shock and contributes to the development of smaller and lighter components.

4. Manufacture and Assembly of an Antenna Development Model

Based on the design details described above, a development model of a 6 m deployable mesh reflector antenna with the proposed antenna mechanisms based on the superelastic SMA was manufactured. The antenna was assembled in the following order: assembly of the primary reflector ribs, assembly of the secondary reflector mast, and mesh fastening. Figure 13 shows the configuration of the primary reflector assembly jig. The primary reflector rib was assembled using an assembly jig to ensure that 28 ribs could be assembled with a uniform curvature. Each rib was fixed in place by applying fixation pins to the guide holes in the assembly jig and a hinge mechanism was assembled to enable fastening from the same position. After the assembly of the ribs was completed, each rib was assembled on the base plate, and the SMA wires were fastened in the circumferential direction of the antenna. The overall assembly configuration of the primary reflector ribs is shown in Figure 14.
A square-cut mesh fabric was fastened after completing the assembly of the antenna structure. Figure 15 shows the mesh fastening sequence of the antenna structure. The mesh fabric was initially fixed by aligning its center with the center of the antenna and then fastening a ring structure designed to hold the mesh to the base plate using a clamping method. Subsequently, to form the reflection surface, the mesh fabric was spread out, and weights were attached to each rib end to ensure that equal tension was applied. After the reflection surface was formed, access to the interior of the antenna was impossible. Therefore, a lifting device was used to rotate the antenna, enabling the thin plate and mesh to be fastened together using push-button rivets. Thereafter, the antenna was rotated back to its original position, and the mesh between each rib was sewn onto the SMA wires integrated at the tips of the ribs. The excess mesh was trimmed to complete the mesh fastening process. Figure 16 shows the stowed and deployed configurations of the antenna development model after the assembly.

5. System-Level Deployment Test of the Antenna Development Model

To verify the design effectiveness of the antenna mechanisms at the system level, we performed repeated deployment tests and surface error measurement on the antenna development model in a room-temperature environment under 1 g conditions. Figure 17 shows the repeated deployment test setup of the antenna development model system. During the entire deployment process, excluding the release of the launch lock device, the sequence proceeded with the release of the rotary-type HRM, simultaneous deployment of the first and second ribs, speed control of the deployment using the rotary damper, and deployment completion. For the rotary-type HRM, the pin-puller mechanism was simulated using a hot-wire cutting method to sever the nylon wire. Figure 18 shows the surface RMS error measurement process of the primary reflector. To scan the reflection surface, a digital photogrammetry technique was used, with 78 tape targets for each rib, for a total of 2184 tape targets, which were attached to the surface of the primary reflector ribs. Two scale bars and 45 coded targets were placed on the floor of the test facility to determine the position and angle of the camera in 3D space. Finally, 30 photographs per deployment test from various angles were taken with a high accuracy digital camera, and surface RMS error measurement results for the ideal design surface was obtained through V-STARS software from Geodetic Systems, Inc [24]. The surface RMS error requirement for repeated deployments was set to within 1 mm, based on the wavelength of the S-band.
Figure 19 shows the deployment sequence of the mesh antenna during the deployment tests, with three repetitions performed to verify the functionality. During the test, we confirmed that the rotary-type HRM functioned properly as the second ribs were released immediately after the nylon wire was cut. Visual inspection was performed to assess any damage to the components of the antenna mechanisms before and after the repeated deployment tests. We verified that deployment occurred without any performance degradation or plastic deformation. Figure 20 shows the RMS error analysis results obtained after the repeated deployment tests. The RMS error of the surface was measured for an ideal curved surface with a focal length of 2100 mm. The surface RMS error after the assembly was 11.42 mm, and the maximum difference of surface RMS errors before and after the test under repeated deployment were 10.51 mm. The tendency for high surface RMS errors compared with the designed surface was caused by the application of readily available commercial components to realize the mechanical shape of the antenna development model, except for the superelastic SMA based mechanism, contributed to the high manufacturing and assembly errors. The application of commercial rotary dampers with a wide error margin of ±26% resulted in excessive damping torques relative to the designed deployment torque and the dummy mesh made of silver nano-coated Teflon with a 16% elongation, which is easily deformed. The use of commercial composites with lower stiffness and strength compared to space-grade materials for the primary and secondary reflector structures increased manufacturing and cumulative assembly errors. In addition, the absence of mechanical ground support equipment such as a test platform, which can be leveled depending on the flatness of the test facility and jigs that can maintain alignment during antenna system assembly contributed to the increase in surface error. Despite the high numerical surface error compared with the ideal design surface owing to the aforementioned factors, the surface error distribution on the primary reflector exhibited a consistent pattern following repeated deployments. The difference in surface RMS error before and after testing was a maximum of 0.91 mm, corresponding to an error rate of 8.3%, which satisfied the testing requirements and thus confirmed the effectiveness of the antenna mechanisms. Table 4 lists antenna gain calculated results based on measured surface RMS error. The gain was calculated by substituting the surface RMS error data obtained from the repeated deployment test using Microwave Studio, an antenna simulation software from Dassault Systèmes [25]. The minimum gain was calculated to be 42.8 dBi, and it was confirmed that the 6 m mesh reflector antenna with the proposed mechanism can be utilized as an S-band antenna, which is mainly applied in satellite communication systems. However, the allowable temperature range of superelastic SMA is −20~80 °C [18]. It is believed that the space application of the proposed mechanisms is possible if the operating temperature requirements are set at the design stage and thermal design is applied.

6. Conclusions

In this study, we designed and experimentally verified the mechanisms for a 6 m parabolic deployable mesh reflector antenna based on a superelastic SMA. The SMA was applied to the hinge mechanism of each primary reflector rib and a rotary-type HRM as a deployment mechanism. Additionally, by applying an SMA wire to the outside of the antenna, the curvature of the primary reflector was maintained without plastic deformation, even for large deformations owing to the stowed and deployed configurations. When fastening the mesh, a clamping-type mesh fastening technique was presented using a thin plate and push-button rivets. This technique is effective in preventing tearing of the mesh, maintaining the curvature, and easing the fastening process compared with the commonly applied stitching method.
Repeated deployment tests were performed on the superelastic SMA-based hinge mechanism specimen to verify the feasibility of the proposed mechanism. The results of the test demonstrated that deployment without plastic deformation was possible even after 30 repeated deployments when applying a plate with a thickness of 0.8 mm, as per the design concept. Furthermore, an increase in the thickness of the specimens resulted in enhanced damping characteristics, which can be attributed to the superelastic effect of the SMA. This tendency is expected to effectively reduce the residual vibrations of the reflection surface after deployment.
Finally, a development model of the 6 m deployable mesh reflector antenna with the proposed antenna mechanisms was manufactured, and repeated deployment tests were performed on the antenna development model to verify the design effectiveness of the antenna mechanisms at the system level. A total of three repetitions were performed to verify the functionality, and the surface precision was verified through an RMS error analysis. The results of the deployment test showed that the primary reflector satisfied the testing requirements, confirming the effectiveness of the antenna mechanism. In addition, the surface RMS error data obtained from repeated deployment tests were substituted to calculate the expected antenna gain. From the results, it is believed that the space application of the proposed antenna mechanism is feasible if the operating temperature requirements and thermal design for the allowable temperature range of the superelastic SMA are established.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-S.C. and H.-U.O.; methodology, J.-S.C., B.-G.C. and H.-U.O.; validation, J.-S.C. and H.-U.O.; formal analysis, J.-S.C.; investigation, J.-S.C.; data curation, J.-S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-S.C.; writing—review and editing, J.-S.C., T.-Y.P. and H.-U.O.; visualization, J.-S.C. and H.-U.O.; supervision, H.-U.O.; project administration, B.-G.C. and H.-U.O.; funding acquisition, H.-U.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of the Republic of Korea (NRF) with a grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2020M1A3B8084734).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Tae-Yong Park, Bong-Geon Chae and Hyun-Ung Oh were employed by the company STEP Lab. Ltd. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. The Newspace Paradigm: SpaceX Is Just the Beginning. Available online: http://trinitamonti.org/2020/07/15/the-newspace-paradigm-spacex-is-just-the-beginning/ (accessed on 3 August 2024).
  2. Lappas, V.; Kostopoulos, V. A survey on small satellite technologies and space missions for geodetic applications. Satell. Mission. Technol. Geosci. 2020, 8, 123–144. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rahamat-Samii, Y.; Manohar, V.; Kovitz, J.M.; Hodges, R.E.; Freebury, G.; Peral, E. Development of highly constrained 1m Ka-band mesh deployable offset reflector antenna for next generation CubeSat radars. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2019, 67, 6254–6266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rao, S.; Shafai, L.; Sharma, S. Handbook of Reflector Antennas and Feed Systems Volume III: Applications of Reflectors; Artech: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. Scialino, G.L.; Salvini, P.; Migliorelli, M.; Pennestri, E.; Valentini, P.P.; van’t Klooster, K.; Santiago-Prowald, J.; Rodrigues, G.; Gloy, Y. Structural characterization and modeling of metallic mesh material for large deployable reflectors. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference: Advanced Lightweight Structures and Reflector Antennas, Tbilisi, Georgia, 1–3 October 2014; pp. 182–192. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hasanzade, V.; Sedighy, S.H.; Shahravi, M. Compact deployable umbrella antenna design with optimum communication properties. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2017, 54, 782–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lopatin, A.V.; Morozov, E.V.; Kazantsev, A.; Berdnikova, N.A. Deployment analysis of a composite thin-walled toroidal rim with elastic hinges: Application to an umbrella-type reflector of spacecraft antenna. Compos. Struct. 2023, 306, 116566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chahat, N.; Hodges, R.E.; Sauder, J.; Thomson, M.; Rahmat-Samii, Y. The deep-space network telecommunication CubeSat antenna: Using the deployable Ka-band mesh reflector antenna. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2017, 59, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Urata, K.N.; Sri, J.T.; Santosa, C.E.; Viscor, T. Development of an L-band SAR microsatellite antenna for earth observation. Aerospace 2018, 5, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, X.J.; Nie, J.X. Study of a new application form of shape memory alloy superelasticity. Smart Mater. Struct. 2003, 12, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Otsuka, K.; Xu, Y.; Ren, X.B. Ti-Ni-based shape memory alloys as smart materials. Mater. Sci. Forum 2003, 426–432, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Seo, J.W.; Kim, Y.C.; Hu, J.W. Pilot study for investigating the cyclic behavior of slit damper systems with recentering shape memory alloy (SMA) bending bars used for seismic restrainers. Appl. Sci. 2015, 5, 187–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kwon, S.C.; Oh, H.U. Passive micro-jitter isolation of gimbal-type antenna by using a superelastic SMA gear wheel. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 114, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kwon, S.C.; Jeon, Y.H.; Oh, H.U. Micro-jitter attenuation of spaceborne cooler by using a blade-type hyperelastic shape memory alloy passive isolator. Cryogenics 2017, 87, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Park, Y.H.; Kwon, S.C.; Koo, K.R.; Oh, H.U. High damping passive launch vibration isolation system using superelastic SMA with multilayered viscous lamina. Aerospace 2021, 8, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, J.H.; Park, S.W.; Kim, J.P.; Oh, H.U. Passive damping of solar array vibrations using hyperelastic shape memory alloy with multilayered viscous lamina. Aerospace 2023, 10, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lim, J.H.; Kim, Y.B.; Jang, I.S.; Kim, H.R.; Oh, H.U. Parabolic deployable mesh antenna with a hingeless system of superelastic SMA ribs and composite tape springs. Acta Astronaut. 2022, 200, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Omori, T.; Ando, K.; Okano, M.; Xu, X.; Tanaka, Y.; Ohnuma, I.; Ishida, K. Superelastic effect in polycrystalline ferrous alloys. Science 2011, 333, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Northrop Grumman. Antares User’s Guide. Available online: https://newspaceeconomy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/antares-user-guide-1.pdf (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  20. L3HARRIS. Unfurlable Mesh Reflector Antennas. Available online: https://www.l3harris.com/all-capabilities/unfurlable-mesh-reflector-antennas (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  21. Contu, S.; Meschini, A.; Rigato, R. Development status of large reflectors at TAS-I. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Indian Conference on Antennas and Propagation (InCAP), Ahmedabad, India, 19–22 December 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  22. Angevain, J.C.; Ihle, A.; Rodrigues, G.; Santiago-Prowald, J. Large deployable spaceborne reflector antennas in Europe: Progress status and perspectives. In Proceedings of the 2019 13th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Krakow, Poland, 31 March–5 April 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  23. ECSS-E-ST-33-01C Rev. 2; Space Engineering: Mechanisms, European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS). ESA-ESTEC; European Space Agency: Paris, France, 2019.
  24. Geodetic Systems, Inc. V-STARS N. Available online: https://www.geodetic.com/products/systems/v-stars-n/ (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  25. Dassault Systèmes. CST Microwave Studio. Available online: https://www.3ds.com/products/simulia/cst-studio-suite (accessed on 7 September 2024).
Figure 1. Characteristics of superelastic SMA materials according to phase transformation.
Figure 1. Characteristics of superelastic SMA materials according to phase transformation.
Aerospace 11 00738 g001
Figure 2. Stowed configuration of the mesh antenna in Antares 233 fairing.
Figure 2. Stowed configuration of the mesh antenna in Antares 233 fairing.
Aerospace 11 00738 g002
Figure 3. Configuration of the mesh antenna: (a) deployed configuration, (b) stowed configuration.
Figure 3. Configuration of the mesh antenna: (a) deployed configuration, (b) stowed configuration.
Aerospace 11 00738 g003aAerospace 11 00738 g003b
Figure 4. Bounding box of the mesh antenna: (a) deployed configuration, (b) stowed configuration.
Figure 4. Bounding box of the mesh antenna: (a) deployed configuration, (b) stowed configuration.
Aerospace 11 00738 g004
Figure 5. Mechanical configuration of the deployment mechanism: (a) deployed configuration, (b) stowed configuration.
Figure 5. Mechanical configuration of the deployment mechanism: (a) deployed configuration, (b) stowed configuration.
Aerospace 11 00738 g005
Figure 6. Deployment procedure of the primary reflector.
Figure 6. Deployment procedure of the primary reflector.
Aerospace 11 00738 g006
Figure 7. Operational configuration of the rotary-type HRM.
Figure 7. Operational configuration of the rotary-type HRM.
Aerospace 11 00738 g007
Figure 8. Mechanical configuration of secondary reflector mast.
Figure 8. Mechanical configuration of secondary reflector mast.
Aerospace 11 00738 g008
Figure 9. Mechanical configuration of the clamping-type mesh-fastening technique.
Figure 9. Mechanical configuration of the clamping-type mesh-fastening technique.
Aerospace 11 00738 g009
Figure 10. Repeated deployment test setup for the superelastic SMA-based hinge mechanism.
Figure 10. Repeated deployment test setup for the superelastic SMA-based hinge mechanism.
Aerospace 11 00738 g010
Figure 11. Latch shock measurement results.
Figure 11. Latch shock measurement results.
Aerospace 11 00738 g011
Figure 12. Repetitive deployment test results: (a) nominal position variation of each case, (b) visual inspection results after the tests.
Figure 12. Repetitive deployment test results: (a) nominal position variation of each case, (b) visual inspection results after the tests.
Aerospace 11 00738 g012
Figure 13. Configuration of the primary reflector rib assembly jig.
Figure 13. Configuration of the primary reflector rib assembly jig.
Aerospace 11 00738 g013
Figure 14. Assembly configuration of the primary reflector ribs on the base plate.
Figure 14. Assembly configuration of the primary reflector ribs on the base plate.
Aerospace 11 00738 g014
Figure 15. Mesh fastening sequence of the antenna structure.
Figure 15. Mesh fastening sequence of the antenna structure.
Aerospace 11 00738 g015
Figure 16. Configuration of the mesh antenna development model: (a) stowed configuration, (b) deployed configuration.
Figure 16. Configuration of the mesh antenna development model: (a) stowed configuration, (b) deployed configuration.
Aerospace 11 00738 g016
Figure 17. Repeated deployment test set-up of antenna development model system level.
Figure 17. Repeated deployment test set-up of antenna development model system level.
Aerospace 11 00738 g017
Figure 18. Surface RMS error measurement process of the primary reflector.
Figure 18. Surface RMS error measurement process of the primary reflector.
Aerospace 11 00738 g018
Figure 19. Deployment sequence of the mesh antenna during deployment tests: (a) primary reflector rib HRM release, (b) simultaneous deployment of ribs 1 and 2, (c) fully deployed.
Figure 19. Deployment sequence of the mesh antenna during deployment tests: (a) primary reflector rib HRM release, (b) simultaneous deployment of ribs 1 and 2, (c) fully deployed.
Aerospace 11 00738 g019
Figure 20. RMS error analysis results of the antenna after repetitive deployment test.
Figure 20. RMS error analysis results of the antenna after repetitive deployment test.
Aerospace 11 00738 g020
Table 1. Material properties of superelastic SMA.
Table 1. Material properties of superelastic SMA.
ItemValue
Dimension (L × W × H, mm)162 × 5 × 0.8
Austenite finish temperature ( A f , °C)15
Allowable temperature (°C) [18]−20~80
Modulus of elasticity (GPa)Martensite20
Austenite30.3
Poisson’s ratio0.3
Density (g/cm3)6.45
Tensile strength (GPa)1.3
Elongation at break (%)45
Table 2. Comparison of packaging efficiencies.
Table 2. Comparison of packaging efficiencies.
Packaging
Efficiency
Proposed Ant.L3HARRIS (Radial Rib Ant.) [20]TAS-I
(Petal-Rib Ant.) [21]
V-Space (Wrapped-Rib Ant.) [8]OSS (Wrapped-Rib Ant.) [22]
L d [m]6.139.005.003.602.70
η L 2.5614.753.476.323.51
η h 1.001.381.001.003.79
η V 6.58300.5212.0639.8946.62
Table 3. Results of deployment analysis.
Table 3. Results of deployment analysis.
Analysis Case W (J/m3) Latch Shock (g)
With hysteresis8.715.7
Without hysteresis052.4
Table 4. Antenna gain calculated results based on measured surface RMS error.
Table 4. Antenna gain calculated results based on measured surface RMS error.
CaseMeasured Surface RMS Error
(mmRMS)
Difference in
Surface RMS Error
(mmRMS)
Antenna Gain
Based on Difference in Surface RMS Error
(dBi)
Initial Reflection
Surface
11.420.0047.70
After 1st Deployment11.200.2245.50
After 2nd Deployment10.510.9143.10
After 3rd Deployment11.110.3142.80
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, J.-S.; Park, T.-Y.; Chae, B.-G.; Oh, H.-U. Development of Lightweight 6 m Deployable Mesh Reflector Antenna Mechanisms Based on a Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy. Aerospace 2024, 11, 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11090738

AMA Style

Choi J-S, Park T-Y, Chae B-G, Oh H-U. Development of Lightweight 6 m Deployable Mesh Reflector Antenna Mechanisms Based on a Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy. Aerospace. 2024; 11(9):738. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11090738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Jae-Seop, Tae-Yong Park, Bong-Geon Chae, and Hyun-Ung Oh. 2024. "Development of Lightweight 6 m Deployable Mesh Reflector Antenna Mechanisms Based on a Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy" Aerospace 11, no. 9: 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11090738

APA Style

Choi, J. -S., Park, T. -Y., Chae, B. -G., & Oh, H. -U. (2024). Development of Lightweight 6 m Deployable Mesh Reflector Antenna Mechanisms Based on a Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy. Aerospace, 11(9), 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11090738

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop