Next Article in Journal
Short-Term Expectation Formation Versus Long-Term Equilibrium Conditions: The Danish Housing Market
Next Article in Special Issue
Johansen’s Reduced Rank Estimator Is GMM
Previous Article in Journal
The Turkish Spatial Wage Curve
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Evaluating Forecasts, Narratives and Policy Using a Test of Invariance

1
Magdalen College and Institute for New Economic Thinking, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, OX1 4AU Oxford, UK
2
Department of Economics, and Institute for New Economic Thinking, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, OX1 3UQ Oxford, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Rocco Mosconi and Paolo Paruolo
Econometrics 2017, 5(3), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics5030039
Received: 17 December 2016 / Revised: 14 August 2017 / Accepted: 23 August 2017 / Published: 1 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Celebrated Econometricians: Katarina Juselius and Søren Johansen)
Economic policy agencies produce forecasts with accompanying narratives, and base policy changes on the resulting anticipated developments in the target variables. Systematic forecast failure, defined as large, persistent deviations of the outturns from the numerical forecasts, can make the associated narrative false, which would in turn question the validity of the entailed policy implementation. We establish when systematic forecast failure entails failure of the accompanying narrative, which we call forediction failure, and when that in turn implies policy invalidity. Most policy regime changes involve location shifts, which can induce forediction failure unless the policy variable is super exogenous in the policy model. We propose a step-indicator saturation test to check in advance for invariance to policy changes. Systematic forecast failure, or a lack of invariance, previously justified by narratives reveals such stories to be economic fiction. View Full-Text
Keywords: forediction; invariance; super exogeneity; indicator saturation; co-breaking; Autometrics forediction; invariance; super exogeneity; indicator saturation; co-breaking; Autometrics
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Castle, J.L.; Hendry, D.F.; Martinez, A.B. Evaluating Forecasts, Narratives and Policy Using a Test of Invariance. Econometrics 2017, 5, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics5030039

AMA Style

Castle JL, Hendry DF, Martinez AB. Evaluating Forecasts, Narratives and Policy Using a Test of Invariance. Econometrics. 2017; 5(3):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics5030039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castle, Jennifer L.; Hendry, David F.; Martinez, Andrew B. 2017. "Evaluating Forecasts, Narratives and Policy Using a Test of Invariance" Econometrics 5, no. 3: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics5030039

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop