Next Article in Journal
A Conditional Approach to Panel Data Models with Common Shocks
Next Article in Special Issue
A Method for Measuring Treatment Effects on the Treated without Randomization
Previous Article in Journal
How Credible Are Shrinking Wage Elasticities of Married Women Labour Supply?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Forecasting Interest Rates Using Geostatistical Techniques

Forecasting Value-at-Risk under Different Distributional Assumptions

by 1,† and 1,2,*,†
Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), Université catholique de Louvain, 34 Voie du Romans Pays, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Center for Research in Finance and Management (CeReFiM), Université de Namur, 62 Rue de Bruxelles, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Academic Editors: Fredj Jawadi, Tony S. Wirjanto and Nuttanan Wichitaksorn
Econometrics 2016, 4(1), 3;
Received: 15 July 2015 / Revised: 16 December 2015 / Accepted: 21 December 2015 / Published: 11 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments of Financial Econometrics)
Financial asset returns are known to be conditionally heteroskedastic and generally non-normally distributed, fat-tailed and often skewed. These features must be taken into account to produce accurate forecasts of Value-at-Risk (VaR). We provide a comprehensive look at the problem by considering the impact that different distributional assumptions have on the accuracy of both univariate and multivariate GARCH models in out-of-sample VaR prediction. The set of analyzed distributions comprises the normal, Student, Multivariate Exponential Power and their corresponding skewed counterparts. The accuracy of the VaR forecasts is assessed by implementing standard statistical backtesting procedures used to rank the different specifications. The results show the importance of allowing for heavy-tails and skewness in the distributional assumption with the skew-Student outperforming the others across all tests and confidence levels. View Full-Text
Keywords: Value-at-Risk; forecast accuracy; distributions; backtesting Value-at-Risk; forecast accuracy; distributions; backtesting
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Braione, M.; Scholtes, N.K. Forecasting Value-at-Risk under Different Distributional Assumptions. Econometrics 2016, 4, 3.

AMA Style

Braione M, Scholtes NK. Forecasting Value-at-Risk under Different Distributional Assumptions. Econometrics. 2016; 4(1):3.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Braione, Manuela, and Nicolas K. Scholtes. 2016. "Forecasting Value-at-Risk under Different Distributional Assumptions" Econometrics 4, no. 1: 3.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop