Next Article in Journal
Comparison of the Ability to Control Water Loss in the Detached Leaves of Wedelia trilobata, Wedelia chinensis, and Their Hybrid
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Cadmium Toxicity on Growth, Oxidative Damage, Antioxidant Defense System and Cadmium Accumulation in Two Sorghum Cultivars
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Non-Destructive Measurements to Identify Cucurbit Species (Cucurbita maxima and Cucurbita moschata) Tolerant to Waterlogged Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/plants9091228
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Allelopathic Potential of Aqueous Extract from Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on Lactuca sativa

by
M. Iftikhar Hussain
1,2,*,
Mohamed A. El-Sheikh
3 and
Manuel J. Reigosa
1
1
Department of Plant Biology and Soil Science, Faculty of Biology, University of Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, E-36310 Vigo, Spain
2
CITACA, Agri-Food Research and Transfer Cluster, Campus da Auga, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain
3
Botany & Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(9), 1228; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091228
Submission received: 13 August 2020 / Revised: 13 September 2020 / Accepted: 14 September 2020 / Published: 18 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses: Crosstalk between Biochemistry and Ecophysiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We studied the polyphenol (phenolic compounds and flavonoids) composition and allelopathic effects of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. aerial foliage aqueous extract (0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) on the seedling growth and plant biomass of the general biotest species, lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Mean leaf fresh weight, leaf dry weight, root fresh weight and root dry weight were decreased following exposure to Acacia aerial foliage, flowers aqueous extract (AFE) and phyllodes aqueous extract (APE) after 6 days. The reduction in plant dry biomass was more than 50% following treatment with AFE. The decrease in mean root length was approximately 37.7% and 29.20% following treatment with Acacia flowers extract (AFE) at 75% and 100% concentration, respectively. Root dry weight of L. sativa was reduced by both flowers and phyllodes extract. The reduction of protein contents in lettuce leaves following Acacia foliage extract proved that both AFE and APE exhibit polyphenols that causes the toxicity which led to decrease in leaf protein contents. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) was employed to analyze the A. melanoxylon flowers and phyllodes. A total of 13 compounds (accounting for most abundant compounds in flowers and phyllodes) include different flavonoids and phenolic compounds. The phytochemical compounds detected were: Gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, and ferulic acid. The major flavonoid compounds identified include rutin, luteolin, apigenin, and catechin. Allelopathic effects of flower and phyllodes extracts from A. melanoxylon may be due to the presence of above compounds identified by HPLC analysis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Allelopathy can be referred as “any process that involves secondary metabolites produced by plants, algae, bacteria and fungi that influence the growth and development of biological systems” [1]. For the last decades, the study of the allelopathic phenomenon has reached a specialized level of knowledge, but it is still necessary to introduce it into the modern ecophysiological concept to give answers to several unanswered questions [2,3]. The intensity of the allelopathic effect in the field will depend, between others, on the different transformations that the organic compounds will suffer after the release to the environment. Exotic plants are causing a serious threat to the native plants and ecosystem through interfering in growth and ecophysiological attributes of neighbours [4,5,6,7].
Nonindigenous plants present a serious risk to their neighboring plant [8]. Invasive plants possess several phytotoxic compounds, when released into the environment impede the germination and seedling growth of surrounding plant species at both ecosystem and species level [9,10]. Secondary metabolites are active allelopathic compounds released in the natural plant-soil-environment ecosystem from allelopathic crops, weeds, halophytes, shrubs and trees and their natural leachates might interfere with growth and physiological attributes of neighbouring plant species [3,10]. These toxic metabolites can be stored in the vacuole, polymerised or directly liberated, but anyway, they will be finally released to the environment where they can act as allelopathic agents on the metabolism of neighbouring plants, and giving usually an advantage to the producer [11].
Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. commonly known as Blackwood belonging to the family Fabaceae, subfamily Mimosoidae is a perennial tree, is native to Australia and Tasmania. It has now spread to various parts of the world including Asia, Africa and Europe [12]. The tree has wider ecological amplitude and has potential to grow in a wide range of soil types, and currently invading coastal habitats of North Western Iberian Peninsula, (Spain and Portugal). It has been listed as one of the most dangerous invasive species and currently invading the agriculture open fields, along the water channels, and rivers [13]. The allelopathic effects of A. melanoxylon on neighboring plants has been implied [14,15], but not thoroughly investigated. The phyllodes of A. melanoxylon have also been previously shown to contain allelochemicals [14] and affecting the natural vegetation [16]. The search for plant protection measures as an alternative to chemical weed control, which are widely used in agronomic and field and horticulture crops is of paramount importance [17,18].
Alternative control methods can take advantage of ecological processes such as using natural water extract of allelopathic plants, natural leachates and mixing the plant residues in the soil or applying allelopathic substances through foliar spray [3,19]. Several authors evaluated the role of allelopathy for weed management through allelopathic plant tissue aqueous extract. Brassica, mulberry and sorghum aqueous extracts have demonstrated their allelopathic potential in the laboratory and field experiments mainly through plant density reduction and biomass inhibition of Cyperus rotundus L. and Trianthema portulacastrum L. [20,21]. Allelopathic water extracts are water-soluble allelochemicals extracted from plants. Allelopathic water extract is used as natural herbicide because most of allelochemical compounds are water-soluble and are easy to apply without additional wetting agent, and they are more environmentally friendly than synthetic herbicide. According to Bajwa et al. [18], water extracts of mature fine grains greatly control the population and biomass of a weed competitor, and fine grain water extract reduces weed growth and density and increases wheat yield. However, allelochemicals from different plants and the concentration of the extract has different effects on the target plants, respectively [18].
Although, the role of A. melanoxylon allelopathy in controlling weeds and its phytotoxic impact is well known; nonetheless, influence of aerial foliage aqueous extract on the horticulture crops like lettuce has not been explored extensively. Meanwhile, as one of the most common cultivated vegetables in the open agriculture fields that are colonized by Acacia melanoxylon R. Br., lettuce’ seedlings are very sensitive to the changes in the environmental factorss and often used as a general biotest species in allelopathic bioassays [19]. The findings from this study will elaborate a solid foundation to better understand the allelopathic mechanism that drives the successful colonization of A. melanoxylon in the North Western Iberian Peninsula. These findings will also help policy makers to prepare guidelines and measures for prevention and possible control of invasive alien species. This study elucidated the three hypothesis: (I) A. melanoxylon foliage water extract recruit adverse influences on root/shoot length, fresh and dry weights of leaves and roots of lettuce and the adverse influences notably upsurge with increasing concentration of Acacia foliage extract; (II) flower and phyllodes aqueous extract intensify the allelopathy of A. melanoxylon on seedling growth of lettuce; (III) the allelopathic potential of A. melanoxylon foliage might be due to the presence of different polyphenols (phenolic compounds and flavonoids) and hence, these polyphenols can be used as lead compounds in herbicide discovery program.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of A. melanoxylon Foliage on Lettuce Growth and Biomass Accumulation

The phytotoxicity of A. melanoxylon (flowers and phyllodes) was evaluated by measuring the leaf and root length and biomass accumulation of L. sativa seedlings grown in the presence or absence of the Acacia aqueous extract. Table 1 and Table 2 show the mean leaf fresh weight (LFW), leaf dry weight (LDW), root fresh weight (RFW) and root dry weight (RDW) following exposure to Acacia aqueous extract (AAE) after 6 days. It can be seen that Acacia flower extract (AFE) (100%) significantly decreased the LFW (Table 1) while lettuce LFW was also reduced following treatment with A. melanoxylon phyllodes extract (Table 1). Acacia flower extract (AFE) exhibits a slight but significant phytotoxic effect on L. sativa, as revealed by a decrease in mean root fresh and root dry weight of approximately 51% and 42.5%, respectively, compared to the control (Table 2). Treatments, including AFE, are much more effective in reducing the leaf/root biomass, growth in L. sativa, with an inhibition percentage reaching more than 60% after treatment with Acacia aqueous extract aqueous extract (50%). There were non-significant differences in leaf dry/fresh weight ratio, root dry/fresh weight ratios, of the lettuce grown with different levels of Acacia flowers/phyllodes aqueous extract.
The shoot length of L. sativa significantly inhibited by Acacia phyllodes extract (APE) at each concentration tested, while 100% proved to be very lethal because it caused 50.78% phytotoxic effect in L. sativa shoot length (Table 3). The decrease in mean root length of was approximately 37.7% and 29.20% following treatment with Acacia flowers extract (AFE) (75% and 100%), respectively, compared to the control (Table 3). Treatments, including Acacia flowers extract (AFE), are much more effective in reducing the root growth in L. sativa, with an inhibition percentage reaching more than 50%.
The concentration-induced differences in root fresh weight that was significantly affected following treated with Acacia flowers extract (AFE) at each concentration tested are given in Table 4. Root dry weight of L. sativa was also reduced by both flowers and phyllodes extract (Table 4). However, AFE decreased the root dry weight upto 40% and 39% after treatment with 75% and 50%, respectively.

2.2. Effect of A. melanoxylon Foliage on Lettuce Leaf Protein Contents

Both AFE and APE decreased the protein contents of leaves, (0.78 mg g−1) and (0.83 mg g−1), respectively, following exposure at 100% as compared to control (1.03 mg g−1) (Figure 1). This reduction of leaf protein contents in lettuce leaves following Acacia aerial part extract proved that both AFE and APE exhibit polyphenols that causes the toxicity which led to decrease in leaf protein contents.

2.3. Chemical Composition of the Acacia melanoxylon Aerial Foliage

Table 5 demonstrtae the chemical composition of Acacia melanoxylon aerial foliage (flowers and phyllodes). Several phytochemical constituents were identified from foliage extracts but we concentrated mainly on phenolics and flavonoids. Among the phenolic compounds, eight (8) were most important and include Gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid constituents.
Table 5 showed that p-hydroxybenzoic acid was in highest content (12.33 mg/L), followed by vanillic acid (9.7 mg/L) and were the principal compounds in the flowers and phyllodes extract. In the phyllodes methanol extract, the major flavonoid compounds were rutin, luteolin, apigenin, and catechin.

3. Discussion

Allelochemicals are released to the environment in different ways (by volatilisation, leaching, exudation or decomposition) and can act in a direct or an indirect way on the receptor plants [16,19,22,23]. Their chemical nature is complex and diverse (organic acids, aldehydes, coumarins, quinones, flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, etc.), but the most part of them comes from three principal biosynthetic routes, the route of shikimic acid (benzoic and cinnamic acids and their derivatives, coumarins, glycosides, alkaloids, etc.), and the routes of acetic and mevalonic acids (terpenoids, steroids, complex quinones, etc.) [3,9,10,16]. Allelopathic compounds are present in almost all plants and they can be found in many parts of the plant like in roots, seeds, leave, fruits, stems, etc.
The leaf and root growth of lettuce was decreased following treatment with Acacia melanoxylon R.Br. aerial foliage aqueous extract at all concentration tested. The phytotoxicity of A. melanoxylon R.Br. was previously studied by Souto et al. [14], who reported that soil bioassays showed clear inhibitory effects on growth and germination of understory plants, particularly soils from Eucalyptus and Acacia stands. In this study, the effects of water soluble allelochemicals appear to alter a variety of morpho-physiological functions and significantly reduced the leaf fresh and dry biomass. Zhang et al. [24], showed that allelochemical (isoliquiritigenin) in the concentrations ranged between 0.2–1.0 mM exhibited toxic impacts that decreased the lettuce seedling growth. However, the results were dose dependent. They reported that isoliquiritigenin is an important phytochemical that caused >40% inhibition of radicle elongation in lettuce seedlings following exposure to 0.8 mM concentration. In another study, Sánchez-Moreiras et al. [25] documented that natural product 2-(3H)-benzoxazolinone caused a 50% reduction in the radicle length of lettuce at a concentration of 0.9 mM. Several authors indicated that it is extremely difficult to separate the growth and physiological secondary effects afrom the primary impacts caused by allelochemicals. However, the secondary impacts led to the disruption of cell differentiation, plant water status, water uptake, respiration, signal transduction, photosynthesis and enzyme function [3,6,7,10,17,26].
The germination and seedling growth (root, shoot length, plant biomass) of plant seeds constitutes a primary step in the growth and development of many plant species and demonstrate an importance to highlight the allelopathic activity. Our seedling growth bioassays showed that AFE and APE exhibit significant amount of water soluble allelochemicals and had phytotoxic impact (p > 0.05) on lettuce growth. These water soluble polyphenols (phenolic compounds and flavonoids) have allelopathic effect on seedling growth, biomass and biochemical traits (leaf protein contents) of lettuce. In some trials, low dose of allelochemicals showed stimulation while higher concentration was lethal. Similarly, Al-Wakeel et al. [27] documented that A. nilotica leaf extract enhanced the plant growth in peas, while a higher concentration was toxic that significantly decrease plant growth in the pea.
Several authors documented that, apart from environmental stresses, different invasive plant species showed phytotoxicity on the physiological and biochemical attributes of lettuce. In our results, Acacia melanoxylon flowers was highly deleterious at (100%) concentration tested and significantly inhibited protein contents in L. sativa as compared to control. However, Wang et al. [28] evaluated the leaf extract of alien invasive plant species, Solidago canadensis L. alone and joint application of nitrogen and cadmium stress. The S. canadensis employee distinctly allelopathy on germination and growth characteristics of lettuce and remarkably increased with increasing concentration of leaf extracts. However, N application relieved the allelopathy, while Cd treatment proved to be lethal, inhibiting the physiological traits of the lettuce.
In another study, BOA caused a significant reduction in leaf proteins due to protein denaturation, following exposure to allelochemicals. They reported that protein synthesis was significantly reduced following treatment with BOA [25]. However, contrary, there was an increase in leaf proteins in maize and decrease in kidney beans following treatment with Acacia nilotica extract [29]. Another study conducted by Lu et al. [30] showed that leaf extracts from three invasive plant species [(Solidago canadensis L., Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers., and Conyza canadensis L. Cronq)] inhibited the seed germination of lettuce. Meanwhile, heavy metals (Cu, Pb) promoted the invasion of all three plant species and allelopathic phenomena were more severe in the presence of heavy metals. Allelopathyic impact was significantly varied from one to other invasive species and S. Canadensis demonstrated moe phytotix than others. The allelopathic activity depended on a number of factors such as evaluating vegetation, extract types and concentration, and environmental attributes. Our results showed that aqueous extract of flowers and phyllodes from A. melanoxylon proved phytotoxic in nature (due to the presence of phytochemicals) and hence decreased the growth and morpho-physiological parameters of L. sativa in a dose-dependent manner (Table 1 and Table 2). These results are in conformity with the earlier reports of allelopathy in A. melanoxylon [13,14,15]. According to Chou et al. [31], foliage extract of Acacia confusa Merr showed significant inhibitory effects on target plant species. Similarly, different concentrations of Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Benth. also showed phytotoxicity against a number of vegetations [32]. Similar results were reported for Acacia nilotica [29], Acacia auriculiformis [33], Acacia nilotica [27]. In the present study, we found that flowers of A. melanoxylon were more phytotoxic as compared to phyllodes. It might be due to the difference in phytotoxicity of different secondary metabolites present in two plant organs and their chemical structure. Several other allelopathic crops, such as sorghum root extract, significantly reduced growth and development of several weeds in the wheat fields [34]. The allelopathic crop residue also showed inhibition of germination of different weeds seeds [35].
The potential effect of the allelochemical will be higher or lower depending on the concentration, the soil transformations, and the target species, but also on the environmental factors and the simultaneous occurrence of other biotic or abiotic stresses. Most of the polyphenols, identified in the present study (Table 5) are assumed to be water soluble and, mostly, phenolics have good potential as templates for new herbicide classes [36,37]. Different polyphenols (phenolic compounds, flavonoids, derivatives of hydoxybenzoic acids, derivatives of cinnamic acids) were identified and seem to be water soluble; previously, it was elaborated that most of the allelochemicals, when in contact with plant cell walls, caused phytotoxicity and interfered in the ecophysiological parameters of the target plants [36,38,39]. These phytochemicals possess certain properties and can be used them as lead compounds for new herbicide discovery program [3,19,23,40,41].
In terms of the allelopathy bioassay employed in this study, it has been widely used in evaluating the allelopathic impact and is also short, simple and highly sensitive [42,43]. Germination, growth and seedling development conditions of the pot experiment are similar to those in the natural environment than that of the laboratory [30]. Therefore, it was suggested that growth and ecophysiological study of the target plant in the natural environment needs further investigation to study the allelopathic stress of the donor plant. Growth, fresh weight, dry weight, shoot length and root length attributes are important biological attributes that were selected as to evaluate the A. melanoxylon allelopathy, whose extract concentration will affect the abundance and competitiveness of recipient plants in natural habitat. However, at present, we have not studied the allelopathic effect of A. melanoxylon extracts on L. sativa seedlings at the molecular level, so the effects on cell division and elongation, growth regulation system and respiration need to be determined in the future context.
The polyphenol composition of Acacia melanoxylon aerial foliage is shown in Table 5. Several phytochemical constituents were identified from foliage extracts but we concentrated mainly on phenolics and flavonoids. Among the phenolic compounds, eight were the most important and include Gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillic acid, siringic acid, p-coumaric acid, and ferulic acid constituents.
The p-hydroxybenzoic acid was highest in content (12.33 mg/L), followed by vanillic acid (9.7 mg/L) and these were the principal compounds in the flower and phyllode extracts as shown in Table 5. In the phyllode methanol extract, major flavonoid compounds were rutin, luteolin, apigenin, and catechin. According to studies of Souto et al. (14), allelopathy was the main process involved in the inhibition of soil microbial activity and retard the germination attributes of Lactuca sativa L., Dactylis glomerata L. and Trifolium repens L. following Acacia and Eucalyptus population as compared to the autochthonous Quercus robur L. The phytotoxic effects were more prominent during Acacia blooming stages. In another investigation carried out through gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy, Freire et al. [44] documented the presence of several polyphenols and phytotoxic molecules such as cinnamic acid derivatives, spinasteryl glucoside and dihydrospinasteryl glucosides. Physiological and biochemical parameters (seedling growth, sugar contents and chlorophyll content) in Zea mays L. (maize) and Phaseolus vulgaris L. were decreased by Acacia nilotica and Eucalyptus rostrata leaf leachates (29). In a pot experiment, Acacia nilotica leaves extract showed a significant reduction in the growth and metabolic activities of 45-day-old pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants. Meanwhile, higher concentration was inhibitory while lower concentration was stimularory. Qualitative and quantitative HPLC analysis of water extract of Acacia nilotica leaves revealed that protocatechuic and caffeic acids were the principal phenolic compounds accompanied by ferulic, cinnamic acids and apigenin in higher quantity, whereas pyrogallic, p-coumaric, syringic acids and coumarin were found in trace amounts [27].

4. Methods and Materials

4.1. Plant Materials

The fresh aerial parts (shoots exhibiting flowers and phyllodes) of Acacia melanoxylon were gathered from natural population from the mountainous area, Lagoas Marcosende campus, University of Vigo, during blooming stage (Pontecedra province, Spain, 42.2406° N, 8.7207° W). The seeds of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Great Lakes California (Asteraceae, Asterales), a food and cash crop, were purchased from Semillas Fito (Barcelona, Spain) and used for seedling growth bioassays.

4.2. Extraction of Polyphenols and HPLC Analysis

The fresh plant tissue was cut into small pieces with scissors and placed in the laboratory at room temperature (25 °C) for air drying because phenolics are not stable to drying in an oven at high temperature. The dry flowers or leaves (1 g), were mixed with 50 mL of methanol/HCl (1000:1, v/v) in a 100-mL Erlenmeyer flask and kept in darkness for 12 h with hand shaking every three hours. The mixture was filtered by using a filter paper and a funnel. The filtrate was saved in refrigerator and the process was repeated with residual plant material for another 12 h by adding 50 mL of methanol/HCl. The mixture was filtered again and two methanolic fractions were combined (approx. 100 mL). This mixture was dried in rotary evaporator under vacuum. The temperature of rotary evaporator was maintained below 35 °C. The remaining material was dissolved in 40 mL of ethanol/water (2:8, v/v) and filtered. Afterwards, three sequential extractions were carried out with 20 mL of diethyl ether. The mixture was extracted with an extraction funnel by shaking vigorously for one minute each time, waiting until complete separation into two phases: the aqueous one in the lower part and an organic one in the upper part of funnel. The organic phases were removed and saved. We collected three ethereal phases in an Erlenmeyer flask. After that, three sequential extractions were carried out with 20 mL ethyl acetate on aqueous phase, obtaining three new organic phases that were collected and combined with ethereal ones. The total organic fractions obtained in this way were dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulphate for 30 min to remove minimum residual water. Subsequently, it was filtered to withdraw sodium sulphate and evaporated to dryness in rotary evaporator. The final residue containing phenolics were re-dissolved in 1 mL methanol/water (1:1, v/v) and filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size nylon membrane filter and saved in refrigerator at 4 °C until HPLC analysis. The henolics were extracted by the method as proposed by Macheix et al. [45] and was optimized by Bolaño et al. [46].

4.3. Extraction of Flavonoids from Flowers and Leaves of A. melanoxylon

The flavonoids were extracted by the method of Markham 1989 with certain modifications. The fresh plant tissue was cut into small pieces with scissors and placed in the laboratory at room temperature (25 °C) for air drying. The dried and powdered flowers or leaves (10 g) were macerated with 300 mL of methanol/water (80:20) for 24 h at room temperature with continuous shaking. The extract was obtained through filtration by using a Buchner funnel with a filter paper. This mixture was dried in rotary evaporator under vacuum until all methanol was removed. The remaining material was re-dissolved in 40 mL of ethanol/water (2:8, v/v) and filtered. The resultant aqueous material was extracted with petroleum ether in an extraction funnel to remove fats, terpens, chlorophylls and xanthophylls. This extraction was repeated three times. Afterwards the mixture was extracted as per described in Phenolics acids, i.e., three sequential extractions with diethyl ether followed by three sequential extractions with ethyl acetate. The total organic fractions obtained in this way were dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulphate for 30 min to remove minimum residual water. Subsequently, it was filtered to withdraw sodium sulphate and evaporated to dryness in rotary evaporator. The final residue was re-dissolved in 2.5 mL methanol and filtered through a 0.45 µm pore size nylon membrane filter and saved in refrigerator at −20 °C until HPLC analysis.

4.4. UV-DIODE ARRAY Chemical Analyses

Analysis was performed using a Shimadzu chromatograph equipped with a UV-DIODE ARRAY detector to identify phenolic and flavonoids. Identification of the compounds was made by using a reverse-phase Waters Nova-Pak C-18 (4.6 × 250 mm) column with a 4µm particle size. For flavonoids, the extracts were analyzed using two mobile phases: (A) methanol:phosphoric acid 999:l and (B) water: phosphoric acid 999:1. Linear gradients starting with 20% (A) and ending with 100% (A) were used over the first 40 min with an additional 5 min at 100% (A). The flow rate of the mobile phase was 1 mL/min and the eluate was analyzed at 250–400 nm. For the phenolic compounds, extracts were analyzed using two mobile phases: (A) water: acetic acid 98:2 and (B) water: methanol: acetic acid 68:30:2. Linear gradients starting with 100% (A) and ending with 20% (A) were used over the first 59 min, with an additional 6 min at 20% (A). The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.8 mL/min and the eluate was analysed at 210–400 nm.

4.5. Acacia melanoxylon Flowers and Phyllodes Aqueous Extract Preparation for Bioassays

Fresh shoots of Acacia melanoxylon were collected from natural population in the surrounding area of Lagoas Marcosende campus of University of Vigo, during flowering period. The flowers and phyllodes were separated from branches and soaked in distilled water in the ratio of 1:1 (w/v) at room temperature and left in the laboratory for 24 h. Similar extraction techniques were used by Molina et al. [47], in their studies of Eucalyptus spp. and Lorenzo et al. [48], in their studies of allelopathic effects of Acacia dealbata L. The extract was collected, filtered through filter paper and described as 100%. Distilled water was added in this solution to make different dilution (75%, 50% and 25%). We examined effects of both phyllodes and flowers extracts made by mixing plant material in water, as opposed to the often criticized method of tissue disruption and organic solvent extraction that may yield artificially higher levels of specific compounds [37].

4.6. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Great Lakes California (Asteraceae, Asterales)), a food and cash crop and the most widely used model species in allelopathic studies [49], was selected because of its fast germination and homogeneity. The seeds of test species were purchased commercially from Semillas Fito (Barcelona, Spain). The seeds were placed in plastic trays (32 × 20 × 6 cm) with a 5-cm-deep layer of perlite (500 g/tray). The trays were irrigated on alternate days with tap water until germination of seeds and thereafter with 500 mL 1:1 Hoagland solution/tray, twice in a week. Seedlings were germinated in darkened at 20 °C temperatures in environmentally controlled growth chamber. For seedling growth, the environmental conditions were as follows; temperature: 18/8 °C (day/night) and 12/12 h (light/darkness) photoperiod, 80% relative humidity and 200 µmol m−2 s−1 irradiance. One month old seedlings (when plants have three fully expanded leaves), were transferred to pots (10 cm) containing perlite (70g) to stimulate the development of root system and shifted to the glass house with same growing condition and nutrient solution (100 mL/pot). Every second day the pots were well watered with tap water through an automatic irrigation system. One week later, treatment solutions (100 mL/pot) were applied three times (day one, three and five) and measurements were taken on each day. The temperature in the glass house was maintained at 21 ± 2 °C with a relative humidity of 75%. The glasshouse was ventilated with outside air to ensure steady CO2. Aqueous extract (100%, 75%, 50%, 25%) of Acacia melanoxylon (flowers and phyllodes) and control were watered three times (days 1, 3 and 5) with 100 mL solution. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and replicated thrice.

4.7. Plant Growth Measurements

Information about plant height/root length was obtained with a ruler and values were expressed in cm. The fresh and oven dry plant leaves and roots weight were obtained by first weighting independently fresh leaves and roots then after drying these samples in a circulatory air oven at 70 °C for 72 h. The samples were weighed again to get dry weight of plant.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Data was analyzed with the statistical package SPSS® (version 21.00) for Windows® (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were analysed by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Sokal and Rohlf 1995) (when variance were homogeneous) or Kruskal-Wallis test (when heterogeneous). The LSD test as post hoc test was used to determine main differences between treatment means. Significant differences between means of treatment were compared at 5% probability level.

5. Conclusions

The exotic invasive tree in North Western Iberian Peninsula (Galicia, Spain), Acacia melanoxylon, their aerial foliage (flowers and phyllodes) extracts have negative effects on the growth and biomass of a general biotest species Lactuca sativa seedlings. Allelopathic effect of A. melanoxylon extracts at higher concentration was stronger than that of lower concentration and flowers extract showed stronger inhibition in different attributes than phyllodes extract. According to HPLC data of flowers and phyllodes extracts, several phyto-chemicals were identified and they are represented as derivatives of benzoic acid and cinnamic acid. Apart from these phenolic acids, a significant amount of flavonoids such as rutin, quercetin, luteolin, apigenin, and catechin were identified that enhanced the phytotoxicity of the extract. The presence of all these polyphenols thus affects the growth, biomass and root development rate of L. sativa. What’s more, the inhibitory effect of flower extract is stronger than that of phyllodes extract, which is one of the reasons that the allelopathic molecules are in much higher amounts in flowers than phyllodes in A. melanoxylon.

Author Contributions

M.I.H. conducted the experiment, collected data, and drafted the manuscript. M.J.R. designed the experiment and followed upon data collection, helped in article draft, correction, and revision. M.A.E.-S. provided support through the statistical analysis, English language and grammar correction, Ms revision, and edited the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Project 10PXIB310261PR from the Galician Government and Project AGL2010-17885 (sub-programa AGR) “Estudio del modo de acción del citral en larespuesta temprana de plantas superior” funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Subdirección General de Proyectos de Investigación y Proyectos de Investigación Fundamental no orientada. Author M.A.El-Sheikh extends his appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2020/182), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Acknowledgments

We thank Aldo Barreiro, Carlos Bolano and Paula Lorenzo with field and laboratory assistance. Author M.A.El-Sheikh extends his appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2020/182), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anaya, A.L.; Pelayo-Benavides, H.P. Allelopathic potential of Mirabilis jalapa L. (Nyctaginaceae): Effects on germination, growth and cell division of some plants. Allelop. J. 1997, 4, 57–68. [Google Scholar]
  2. Reigosa, M.J.; Sanchez-Moreiras, A.M.; Gonzalez, L. Ecophysiological approaches in allelopathy. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1999, 18, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hussain, M.I.; Reigosa, M.J. Allelochemical stress inhibits growth, leaf water relations, PSII photochemistry, non-photochemical fluorescence quenching and heat energy dissipation in three C3 perennial species. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 4533–4545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lockwood, J.L.; Simberloff, D.; Mckinney, M.L.; Von Holle, B. How many, and which, plants will invade natural areas. Biol. Invasions 2001, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hussain, M.I.; Reigosa, M.J. Characterization of xanthophyll pigments, photosynthetic performance, photon energy dissipation, reactive oxygen species generation and carbon isotope discrimination during artemisinin-induced stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0114826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hussain, M.I.; El-Keblawy, A.; Tsombou, F.M. Leaf age, canopy position, and habitat affect the carbon isotope discrimination and water-use efficiency in three C3 leguminous Prosopis species from a hyper-arid climate. Plants 2019, 8, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hussain, M.I.; Tsombou, F.M.; El-Keblawy, A. Surface canopy position determines the photosystem II photochemistry in invasive and native Prosopis Congeners at Sharjah Desert, UAE. Forests 2020, 11, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, H.; Chen, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; He, H. Comparison of allelopathic effects of two typical invasive plants: Mikania micrantha and Ipomoea cairica in Hainan island. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, B.M.; Liao, H.X.; Chen, W.B.; Wei, H.J.; Peng, S.L. Role of allelopathy in plant invasion and control of invasive plants. Allelop. J. 2017, 41, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kato-Noguchi, H. Involvement of allelopathy in the invasive potential of Tithonia diversifolia. Plants 2020, 9, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Duke, S.O.; Blair, A.C.; Dayan, F.E.; Johnson, R.D.; Meepagala, K.M.; Cook, D.; Bajsa, J. Is (−)-Catechin a novel weapon of spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe)? J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Knapic, S.; Tavares, F.; Pereira, H. Heartwood and sapwood variation in Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. trees in Portugal. Forest 2006, 79, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Souto, X.C.; González, L.; Reigosa, M.J. Comparative analysis of the allelopathic effects produced by four forestry species during the decomposition process in their soils in Galicia (NW Spain). J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20, 3005–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Souto, X.C.; Bolano, J.C.; González, L.; Reigosa, M.J. Allelopathic effects of tree species on some soil microbial populations and herbaceous plants. Biolog. Plant. 2001, 44, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. González, L.; Souto, X.C.; Reigosa, M.J. Allelopathic effects of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. phyllodes during their decomposition. For. Ecol. Manag. 1995, 77, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hussain, M.I.; González, L.; Souto, C.; Reigosa, M.J. Ecophysiological responses of native plants to phytotoxic effect of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. Agrofor. Syst. 2011, 83, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farooq, M.; Khan, I.; Nawaz, A.; Cheema, M.A.; Siddique, K.H. Using sorghum to suppress weeds in autumn planted maize. Crop Prot. 2020, 133, 105162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bajwa, A.A.; Nawaz, A.; Farooq, M. Allelopathic crop water extracts application improves the wheat productivity under low and high fertilizer inputs in a semi-arid environment. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2020, 14, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hussain, M.I.; González, L.; Reigosa, M.J. Phytotoxic effect of allelochemicals and herbicides on photosynthesis, growth and carbon isotope discrimination in Lactuca sativa. Allelop. J. 2010, 26, 157–174. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cheema, Z.A.; Khaliq, A.; Farooq, M. Sorghum allelopathy for weed management in wheat. In Allelopathy in Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry; Zeng, R.S., Mallik, A.U., Luo, S.M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 255–270. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheema, Z.A.; Khaliq, A.; Saeed, S. Weed control in maize (Zea mays L.) through sorghum allelopathy. J. Sustain. Agric. 2004, 23, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Duke, S.O.; Dayan, F.E.; Romagni, J.G.; Rimando, A.M. Natural products as sources of herbicides: Current status and future trends. Weed Res. 2000, 40, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hussain, M.I.; Shackleton, R.T.; El-Keblawy, A.; Del Mar Trigo Pérez, M.; González, L. Invasive Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora), an allergy and health challenge. Plants 2020, 9, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zhang, S.; Sun, S.W.; Shi, H.L.; Zhao, K.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.H.; Wang, W. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms mediated by allelochemical isoliquiritigenin on the growth of lettuce seedlings. Plants 2020, 9, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sánchez-Moreiras, M.A.; Reigosa, M.J. Whole plant response of lettuce after root exposure to BOA (2(3H)-benzoxazolinone). J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 2689–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Farooq, N.; Abbas, T.; Tanveer, A.; Jabran, K. Allelopathy for weed management. In Co-Evolution of Secondary Metabolites; Mérillon, J.M., Ramawat, K., Eds.; Reference Series in Phytochemistry; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 505–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. AL-Wakeel, S.A.M.; Gabr, M.A.; Hamid, A.A.; Abu-EL-Soud, W.M. Allelopathic effects of Acacia nilotica leaf residue on Pisum sativun L. Allelop. J. 2007, 19, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, S.; Wei, M.; Wu, B.; Cheng, H.; Wang, C. Combined nitrogen deposition and Cd stress antagonistically affect the allelopathy of invasive alien species Canada goldenrod on the cultivated crop lettuce. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 261, 108955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. EL-Khawas, S.; Shehata, M.M. The allelopathic potential of Acacia nilotica and Eucalyptus rostrata on monocot (Zea mays L.) and dicot (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) plants. Biotechnology 2005, 4, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, B.; Wang, S.; Wei, M.; Du, D.; Wang, C. Allelopathy of three Compositae invasive alien species on indigenous Lactuca sativa L. enhanced under Cu and Pb pollution. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 267, 109323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chou, C.H.; Fu, C.Y.; Li, S.Y.; Wang, Y.F. Allelopathic potential of Acacia confusa and related species in Taiwan. J. Chem. Ecol. 1998, 24, 2131–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hoque, A.T.M.R.; Ahmad, R.; Uddin, M.B.; Hossain, M.K. Allelopathic effect of different concentration of water extracts of Acacia auriculiformis leaf on some initial growth parameters of five common agricultural crops. Pak. J. Agron. 2003, 2, 92–100. [Google Scholar]
  33. Oyun, M.B. Allelopathic potentialities of Gliricidia sepium and Acacia auriculiformis on the germination and seedling vigour of Maize (Zea maya L.). Amer. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2006, 1, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Roth, C.M.; Shroyer, J.P.; Paulsenice, G.M. Allelopathy of sorghum on wheat under several tillage systems. Agron. J. 2000, 92, 855–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khaliq, A.; Matloob, A.; Irshad, M.S.; Tanveer, A.; Zamir, M.S.I. Organic weed management in maize (Zea mays L.) through integration of allelopathic crop residues. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 2010, 16, 409–420. [Google Scholar]
  36. Djurdjevic, L.; Dinic, A.; Pavlovic, P.; Mitrovic, M.; Karadzic, B.; Tesevic, V. Allelopathic potential of Allium ursinum L. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2004, 32, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Inderjit; Duke, S.O. Ecophysiological aspects of allelopathy. Planta 2003, 217, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Thiébaut, G.; Tarayre, M.; Rodríguez-Pérez, H. Allelopathic effects of native versus invasive plants on one major invader. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rob, M.; Hossen, K.; Iwasaki, A.; Suenaga, K.; Kato-Noguchi, H. Phytotoxic activity and identification of phytotoxic substances from Schumannianthus dichotomus. Plants 2020, 9, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hussain, M.I.; Reigosa, M.J. Higher peroxidase activity, leaf nutrient contents and carbon isotope composition changes in Arabidopsis thaliana are related to rutin stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 1325–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Irimia, R.E.; Lopes, S.M.; Sotes, G.; Cavieres, L.A.; Eren, Ö.; Lortie, C.J.; French, K.; Hierro, J.L.; Rosche, C.; Callaway, R.M.; et al. Biogeographic differences in the allelopathy of leaf surface extracts of an invasive weed. Biol. Invasions 2019, 21, 3151–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, F.J.; Guo, J.Y.; Chen, F.X.; Liu, W.X.; Wan, F.H. Identification of volatile compounds released by leaves of the invasive plant croftonweed (Ageratina adenophora, compositae), and their inhibition of rice seedling growth. Weed Sci. 2012, 60, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shen, S.; Xu, G.; Li, D.; Clements, D.R.; Jin, G.; Liu, S.; Yang, Y.; Chen, A.; Zhang, F.; Kato-Noguchi, H. Allelopathic potential of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) germplasm resources of Yunnan Province in southwest China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 38, 444–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Freire, C.S.; Silvestre, A.J.; Neto, C.P. Demonstration of long-chain n-alkyl caffeates and Δ7-steryl glucosides in the bark of Acacia species by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Phytochem. Anal. Int. J. Plant Chem. Biochem. Tech. 2007, 18, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Macheix, J.J.; Fleuriet, A.; Billot, Y. Fruit Phenolics; C.K.C. Press Inc.: Boca Ratón, FL, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bolaño, J.C.; González, L.; Souto, X.C. Análisis de compuestos fenólicos de bajo peso molecular inducidos por condiciones de estrés, mediante HPLC. In Manual de Técnicas en Ecofisiología Vegetal; Pedrol, N., Reigosa, M.J., Eds.; Gamesal: Vigo, Spain, 1997; pp. 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  47. Molina, A.; Reigosa, M.J.; Carballeira, A. Release of allelochemical agents from litter, throughfall, and topsoil in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus Labill in Spain. J. Chem. Ecol. 1991, 17, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lorenzo, P.; Pazos-Malvido, E.; Gonzalez, L.; Reigosa, M.J. Allelopathic interference of invasive Acacia dealbata: Physiological effects. Allelop. J. 2008, 22, 452–462. [Google Scholar]
  49. Macías, F.A.; Castellano, D.; Molinillo, J.M.G. Search for a standard phytotoxic bioassay for allelochemicals. Selection of standard target species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2512–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 09 01228 g001 550
Figure 1. Inhibitory effects of A. melanoxylon flowers and phyllodes extract (0% and 100%) on the leaf protein contents (mg/g) of Lactuca sativa. Each bar represents the mean (± S.E.) of three replicates. * Asterisks indicate significant differences at level 0.05 with respect to the control.
Figure 1. Inhibitory effects of A. melanoxylon flowers and phyllodes extract (0% and 100%) on the leaf protein contents (mg/g) of Lactuca sativa. Each bar represents the mean (± S.E.) of three replicates. * Asterisks indicate significant differences at level 0.05 with respect to the control.
Plants 09 01228 g001
Table
Table 1. Effect of aqueous extract of aerial foliage of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on leaf fresh weight (g) and leaf dry weight (g) of one month old general biotest species, Lactuca sativa L. LDFW ratio (Leaf dry weight fresh weight ratio).
Table 1. Effect of aqueous extract of aerial foliage of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on leaf fresh weight (g) and leaf dry weight (g) of one month old general biotest species, Lactuca sativa L. LDFW ratio (Leaf dry weight fresh weight ratio).
Growth CharacteristicsTreatments100%75%50%25%
Leaf fresh weight (g)Control10.58 ± 0.6010.58 ± 0.6010.58 ± 0.6010.58 ± 0.60
Acacia phyllodes7.73 ± 0.3 *7.93 ± 0.5 *8.63 ± 0.2 *8.29 ± 1.0 *
Acacia flowers5.10 ± 0.4 *5.62 ± 0.3 *7.25 ± 0.34 *6.85 ± 1.0 *
Leaf dry weight (g)Control1.63 ± 0.151.63 ± 0.151.63 ± 0.151.63 ± 0.15
Acacia phyllodes1.78 ± 0.04 *1.77 ± 0.1 *1.90 ± 0.4 *1.98 ± 0.3 *
Acacia flowers1.23 ± 0.2 *1.21 ± 0.4 *1.45 ± 0.8 *1.64 ± 0.2
LDFW ratioControl0.154 ± 0.070.154 ± 0.070.154 ± 0.070.154 ± 0.07
Acacia phyllodes0.230 ± 0.0 *0.223 ± 0.00 *0.221 ± 0.0 *0.238 ± 0.05 *
Acacia flowers0.272 ± 0.1 *0.215 ± 0.0 *0.200 ± 0.0 *0.240 ± 0.01 *
Each value represents the mean (± S.E.) of three replicates. * Asterik indicates significant differences as compared to control for p < 0.05 according to LSD test.
Table
Table 2. Effect of aqueous extract of aerial foliage of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on on root fresh weight (g) and root dry weight (g) of one month old general biotest species, Lactuca sativa L. RDFW ratio (Root dry weight fresh weight ratio).
Table 2. Effect of aqueous extract of aerial foliage of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on on root fresh weight (g) and root dry weight (g) of one month old general biotest species, Lactuca sativa L. RDFW ratio (Root dry weight fresh weight ratio).
Growth CharacteristicsTreatments100%75%50%25%
Root fresh weight (g)Control6.31 ± 1.16.31 ± 1.06.31 ± 1.16.31 ± 1.2
Acacia phyllodes4.57 ± 0.3 *3.9 ± 0.6 *4.11 ± 0.13 *4.5 ± 0.4 *
Acacia flowers3.82 ± 0.1 *3.44 ± 1.3 *3.79 ± 1.3 *3.07 ± 0.6 *
Rood dry weight (g)Control0.40 ± 0.020.40 ± 0.030.40 ± 0.040.40 ± 0.05
Acacia phyllodes0.27 ± 0.04 *0.32 ± 0.01 *0.29 ± 0.09 *0.37 ± 0.04 *
Acacia flowers0.28 ± 0.2 *0.28 ± 0.04 *0.23 ± 0.001 *0.27 ± 0.09 *
RDFW ratioControl0.064 ± 0.020.064 ± 0.020.064 ± 0.020.064 ± 0.02
Acacia phyllodes0.059 ± 0.010.082 ± 0.01 *0.071 ± 0.01 *0.082 ± 0.01 *
Acacia flowers0.073 ± 0.14 *0.081 ± 0.01 *0.061 ± 0.01 *0.088 ± 0.01 *
Each value represents the mean (± S.E.) of three replicates. * Asterik indicates significant differences as compared to control for p < 0.05 according to LSD test.
Table
Table 3. Effect of aqueous extract of aerial foliage of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on shoot length (cm) and root length (cm) of one month old general biotest species, Lactuca sativa L. RS ratio (Root shoot ratio).
Table 3. Effect of aqueous extract of aerial foliage of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on shoot length (cm) and root length (cm) of one month old general biotest species, Lactuca sativa L. RS ratio (Root shoot ratio).
Growth CharacteristicsTreatments100%75%50%25%
Shoot length (cm)Control15.30 ± 0.2315.30 ± 0.2315.30 ± 0.2315.30 ± 0.23
Acacia phyllodes7.53 ± 0.5 *8.96 ± 1.5 *7.66 ± 0.5 *9.16 ± 1.6 *
Acacia flowers8.96 ± 2.2 *8.0 ± 0.5 *8.16 ± 2.0 *9.66 ± 0.5 *
Root length (cm)Control27.77 ± 0.727.77 ± 0.727.77 ± 0.727.77 ± 0.7
Acacia phyllodes21.33 ± 2.3 *19.0 ± 1.5 *22.66 ± 2.5 *21.5 ± 2.7 *
Acacia flowers19.66 ± 2.0 *17.3 ± 2.0 *22.0 ± 1.7 *21.3 ± 2.0 *
RS ratioControl1.82 ± 0.031.82 ± 0.031.82 ± 0.031.82 ± 0.03
Acacia phyllodes2.83 ± 0.02 *2.12 ± 0.02 *2.95 ± 0.02 *2.34 ± 0.02 *
Acacia flowers2.19 ± 0.01 *2.16 ± 0.02 *2.69 ± 0.01 *2.20 ± 0.02 *
Each value represents the mean (± S.E.) of three replicates. * Asterisk indicate significant differences as compared to control for p < 0.05 according to LSD test.
Table
Table 4. Effect of aqueous extract of aerial foliage of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on root fresh weight (g) and root dry weight (g) of one month old general biotest species, Lactuca sativa L.
Table 4. Effect of aqueous extract of aerial foliage of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on root fresh weight (g) and root dry weight (g) of one month old general biotest species, Lactuca sativa L.
Growth CharacteristicsTreatments100%75%50%25%
Root fresh weight (g)Control6.31 ± 0.346.31 ± 0.346.31 ± 0.346.31 ± 0.34
Acacia phyllodes4.57 ± 0.7 *3.90 ± 0.07 *4.12 ± 0.3 *4.49 ± 0.4 *
Acacia flowers3.82 ± 0.1 *3.44 ± 0.29 *3.79 ± 0.6 *3.07 ± 0.6 *
Root dry weight (g)Control0.45 ± 0.0420.45 ± 0.0420.45 ± 0.0420.45 ± 0.042
Acacia phyllodes0.27 ± 0.02 *0.323 ± 0.04 *0.290 ± 0.09 *0.373 ± 0.04 *
Acacia flowers0.28 ± 0.06 *0.286 ± 0.04 *0.273 ± 0.01 *0.270 ± 0.09 *
RDWFW ratioControl0.071 ± 0.020.071 ± 0.020.071 ± 0.020.071 ± 0.02
Acacia phyllodes0.059 ± 0.01 *0.083 ± 0.01 *0.070 ± 0.01ns0.083 ± 0.01 *
Acacia flowers0.073 ± 0.04ns0.083 ± 0.04 *0.072 ± 0.01ns0.088 ± 0.01 *
Each value represents the mean (± S.E.) of three replicates. * Asterisk indicate significant differences as compared to control for p < 0.05 according to LSD test.
Table
Table 5. Phenolics and flavonoids found in flower and phyllode extracts of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. RT: retention time (minutes) of compounds in column.
Table 5. Phenolics and flavonoids found in flower and phyllode extracts of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. RT: retention time (minutes) of compounds in column.
Sr. No.Common NameScientific NameFlowers mg/LPhyllodes mg/LRT
PHENOLICS
1Gallic acid3,4,5-trihydroxy benzoic acid4.43.416.5
2Protocatechuic acid3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid5.06 12.9
3p-Hydroxybenzoic acid4-hydroxybenzoic acid12.331.4621.9
4p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde 0.910.1628.6
5Vanillic acid4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoic acid9.71.6432.2
6Syringic acid4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid 2.6440.1
7p-Coumaric acid4-hydroxycinnamic acid3.193.649.7
8Ferulic acid4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic acid3.87 57.9
FLAVONOIDS
9Rutin 5342.395032.8720.4
10Quercetin3,3′,4′,5,7-Pentahydroxyflavone326.4 25.2
11Luteolin3′,4′,5,7-Tetrahydroxyflavone388.89706.8926.2
12Apigenin4′,5,7-Trihydroxyflavone 85.5528.5
13Catechin(±)-3,3′,4′,5,7-Flavanpentol 765.447.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hussain, M.I.; El-Sheikh, M.A.; Reigosa, M.J. Allelopathic Potential of Aqueous Extract from Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on Lactuca sativa. Plants 2020, 9, 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091228

AMA Style

Hussain MI, El-Sheikh MA, Reigosa MJ. Allelopathic Potential of Aqueous Extract from Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on Lactuca sativa. Plants. 2020; 9(9):1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hussain, M. Iftikhar, Mohamed A. El-Sheikh, and Manuel J. Reigosa. 2020. "Allelopathic Potential of Aqueous Extract from Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. on Lactuca sativa" Plants 9, no. 9: 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop