Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant and Biological Activities of Acacia saligna and Lawsonia inermis Natural Populations
Next Article in Special Issue
Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals along Three Main Drains in Nile Delta and Potential Phytoremediation by Macrophyte Plants
Previous Article in Journal
The Ethylene Biosynthesis Genes ACS2 and ACS6 Modulate Disease Severity of Verticillium dahliae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytoremediation Potential, Photosynthetic and Antioxidant Response to Arsenic-Induced Stress of Dactylis glomerata L. Sown on Fly Ash Deposits
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/plants9070904
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selenium Enhances Cadmium Accumulation Capability in Two Mustard Family Species—Brassica napus and B. juncea

by
Zhong-Wei Zhang
1,†,
Yi-Ying Dong
1,†,
Ling-Yang Feng
2,
Zong-Lin Deng
1,
Qiang Xu
1,
Qi Tao
1,
Chang-Quan Wang
1,
Yang-Er Chen
3,
Ming Yuan
3 and
Shu Yuan
1,*
1
College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
3
College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Author contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2020, 9(7), 904; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070904
Submission received: 1 July 2020 / Revised: 13 July 2020 / Accepted: 16 July 2020 / Published: 17 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fundamental and Applied Research for the Effective Deployment of Phytoremediation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oilseed rape (Brassica napus) is a Cadmium (Cd) hyperaccumulator. However, high-level Cd at the early seedling stage seriously arrests the growth of rape, which limits its applications. Brassica juncea had higher Cd accumulation capacity, but its biomass was lower, also limiting its applications. Previous studies have confirmed that Selenium (Se) can alleviate Cd toxicity. However, the regulatory mechanism of Se in different valence states of Cd accumulation was unclear. In this study, we investigated the ameliorating effects of three Se valence states, Na2SeO4 [Se(VI)], Na2SeO3 [Se(IV)] and Se-Met [Se(II)], to Cd toxicity by physiological and biochemical approaches in hydroponically-cultured Brassica juncea and Brassica napus seedlings. Although Se treatments slightly inhibited seedling Cd concentration, it tripled or quadrupled the Cd accumulation level per plant, because dry weight increased about four times more with Se and Cd application than with Cd treatment alone. Among the different valence states of Se, Se(II) had the most marked effect on reducing Cd toxicity as evidenced by decreased growth inhibition and Cd content. The application of Se(II) was effective in reducing Cd-induced reactive oxygen species accumulation, and promoted the antioxidant enzyme activity and photosynthesis of both Brassica species. In addition, Se(II) treatment increased the concentrations of Cd in the cell wall and soluble fractions, but the Cd concentration in the organelle part was reduced.

1. Introduction

Cadmium (Cd) is a trace heavy metal naturally present in soil. With the development of industries such as mining and smelting, Cd pollution has become increasingly serious [1]. Cd, a non-essential element of plants, has become a common pollutant in farmland soil environment. Cd ions in the soil are absorbed by the plant roots and transported to the leaves via symplast and apoplast transport [2]. Taken up in non-tolerable amounts, Cd causes growth inhibition and even death by deteriorating physiological processes, including biomass production, nutrient acquisition, antioxidant enzyme activities, and photosynthesis [3,4]. Appropriate fertilization, vacuolar sequestration, and adding exogenous ions might be effective in reducing Cd uptake and its accumulation in crops [5,6]. Recent studies show that the addition of Selenium (Se) as an exogenous ion can reduce Cd toxicity in plants.
Selenium (Se) is one of the essential micronutrients for humans and animals, but is not a necessary nutrient for plant growth. The right amount of Se in plants can inhibit peroxidation, restore the integrity of cell membrane structure and function, change the presence and location of heavy metals, and promote growth development [7,8,9]. Previous reports have shown that Se and Cd in plants are antagonistic, Se can reduce the uptake of Cd in plants [10,11]. Se exists mainly in the form of selenate [Se(VI)], selenite [Se(IV)], and selenide [Se(II)] [12]. However, there have only been a few studies on different valences of Se mitigating the mechanism of Cd toxicity [7,8,9,10,11,12].
Oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) is a Cd hyperaccumulator [13]. Black mustard seed (Brassica juncea L.) has a strong absorption and accumulation ability for Cd, but its geographical distribution range is limited [14]. Oilseed rape has a wide planting area, high yield, and high economic value, but low absorption capacity for Cd [15]. Thus, we selected Brassica napus (BN) and Brassica juncea (BJ) as experimental materials. The purpose of this study is to analyze and evaluate different valencies of Se on Cd accumulation in the two Brassica species. Cadmium stress at the early seedling stage seriously arrested the growth of rape. Although Se treatments have slight inhibitions on the concentration of cadmium per dry weight, selenium significantly increased the biomass of rape, and, hence, it can triple or quadruple the cadmium accumulation level per plant.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Different Valence States of Se on Plant Growth

As shown in Figure 1, the biomass of BN is significantly higher than that of BJ in different treatments. Under Cd treatment, BN seedlings showed obvious symptoms of Cd toxicity, such as leaf chlorosis and growth inhibition. However, Cd-induced growth inhibition was dramatically reduced after the application of Se, and the dry weight (DW) increased about one to four times, compared with Cd-alone treatment. Relative to treatment with Se(IV) and Se(VI), the Se(II) treatment showed a more significant increase in DW in the two Brassica species. However, there was no significant difference in the effects of Se on Cd-mediated growth inhibition between the BJ and BN.

2.2. Effect of Different Valence States of Se on Se and Cd Content

The accumulation of Cd in BJ was always higher than that in BN, and it can be inferred that absorption of Cd by BJ was stronger than that of BN. The maximum content of Cd was observed in the root and shoot of the plant under Cd-alone treatment. In contrast to Cd-alone treatment, the addition of Se(VI), Se(IV), and Se(II) significantly (P < 0.05) decreased Cd levels by 31%, 29%, and 32%, respectively, in the shoot of BJ, but only by 15%, 20%, and 25%, respectively, in the shoot of BN. Therefore, the addition of exogenous Se distinctly reduced the content of Cd, especially Se(II), which could lead to less accumulation of Cd in both BN and BJ seedlings. The Se content in tissues was also below the detection limit when exposed to 50 μM Cd (Figure 2). The Se content in the plant markedly increased after the addition of exogenous Se. BJ accumulation of Se is significantly higher than that BN, the order of Se content was Se(II) > Se(IV) > Se(VI). Although Se treatments slightly inhibited seedling Cd concentration, it tripled or quadrupled the cadmium accumulation level per plant (Figure 2), because the DW increased about four times on Se application compared with that of Cd-alone treatment.

2.3. Effect of Different Valence States of Se on H2O2, O2−, and Lipid Peroxidation

Staining with nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) and 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) dye revealed differences in accumulation of H2O2 and O2− in shoot and quantified throughout the plant (Figure 3). The BN seedlings accumulated more H2O2 and O2− than the BJ. Figure 3 exhibited significant (p < 0.05) increase of H2O2 and O2− in Brassica seedlings exposed to 50 μM Cd. However, Se addition significantly reduced (p < 0.05) H2O2 and O2−∙content. Among them, Se(II) alleviated the Cd-induced H2O2 and O2− accumulation most effectively. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content also showed the same pattern with H2O2 and O2−∙content under Cd stress. However, there was no obvious difference of MDA contents in the roots and shoots of Brassica seedlings treated with three Se valence states.

2.4. Effect of Different Valence States of Se on Antioxidant Enzymes Activities

Antioxidant enzyme activity exhibited differential responses to Cd stress in shoot and root under different treatments (Figure 4). Cd-alone treatment caused dramatic increases in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activity either in shoot or root. This increase was significantly reduced by Se supplementation. In terms of catalase (CAT) activity, Se addition was effective in alleviating Cd-inhibited shoot CAT activity. Interestingly, CAT activity was promoted in the BJ, but inhibited in the BN under exposure to Cd alone. However, the change of CAT activity in root caused by Cd was counteracted by the addition of Se. The three valence states of Se, especially Se(II), significantly alleviated the changes in antioxidant enzymes induced by Cd-alone treatment.

2.5. Effect of Different Valence States of Se on Photosynthetic Parameters

The Cd-alone treatment showed a significant decline in photosynthesis when compared with untreated plants, and the decline was always higher in BJ than BN (Table 1). Both Cd and Se treatment increased the value of net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr), but there were no significant differences in Se(II) and Se(VI). Color images visually depicted the changes in maximum photochemical quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv/Fm), actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) (Figure 5). The color of the Fv/Fm image changed from blue to blue with sporadic green in Cd-alone treatment. The leaf color changed from blue to blue-green with sporadic blue in the ΦPSII under Cd stress. The color of the NPQ image changed from red to red (yellow), with sporadic green when exposed to 50 μM Cd. However, the color was recovered markedly after applying the three Se valence states, especially Se(II). The quantified value chart more intuitively reflected the law of Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, and NPQ color change in the leaf (Figure 5). The rate of change in BJ was lower than in BN under Cd-alone treatment, indicating that the tolerance of Cd in the two Brassica species was different.

2.6. Effect of Different Valence States of Se on Subcellular Cd Distribution

We studied the subcellular distribution of Cd to investigate how Se affected the uptake and transport of Cd (Figure 6). A similar pattern was observed in two Brassica species under the same treatment. Cd stress significantly increased Cd concentrations in the soluble fraction (Fs) and organelle part fraction (Fco) but reduced that in the cell wall fraction (Fcw). Cd levels in Fcw and Fs were higher than those in Fco in the shoot and root after adding Se in its three valence states (Figure 6). The Cd content of Fco was lowest at Se(II) treatment.

3. Discussion

Cadmium ion, Cd2+, is highly soluble and migratory and is easily absorbed by plants [1,2]. The biomass production is an important indicator for assessing plant tolerance to Cd toxicity. A study indicated that, although there were no significant differences in the shoot biomass of the Se-supplied plants as compared to the Cd-exposed cucumber plants, the fresh weight of their roots increased significantly after supplementation of a 50 μM Cd-polluted nutrient solution with 10 μM Se [16]. While for the pepper plants at the reproductive stage, Se supplementation improved the flower number, fruit number, and fruit diameter in plants exposed to 0.5 mM Cd [17]. In our study, the exogenous application of Se greatly improved plant growth when exposed to Cd stress (Figure 1). The reason was that an increase in Se can promote carbohydrate metabolism and improve soluble sugar and starch content [18,19]. In addition, Se can combine with other heavy metals to form insoluble complexes, inhibit the absorption of heavy metals by plants, and reduce the accumulation of heavy metals in plants [20]. The addition of Exogenous Se treatment can reduce the risk of Cd-induced oxidative damages in rice and cabbage [11,21]. Similar results were observed in this study; notably, there was a difference in the amount of Cd accumulated under the three valence states of Se treatment (Figure 2).
The lowest Cd content appeared in the Se(II) treatment, which may be related to the absorption of Se. On the one hand, organic Se [Se(II)] was better for plant absorption than inorganic Se [Se(VI), Se(IV)] [22]. After Se(VI) and Se(IV) are absorbed by plants, they are transported via sulfate transporters, and often transformed into selenide (Se(II)) and incorporated into protein [23,24,25,26]. The levels of Se and Cd were higher and lower, respectively, under Se(II) treatment relative to Se(VI) and Se(IV) treatment, which suggests the protective role of Se against Cd toxicity might be dependent on the competition between Se and the heavy metals. On the other hand, plants have evolved mechanisms, such as cell wall compartmentalization, to alleviate heavy metal stress [27,28]. The cell wall is the first barrier to confine the spread of heavy metals into the cell and contains proteins, polysaccharides, and organic acids that effectively bind heavy metal ions, reducing their entry into the protoplast [29,30]. Se(II) can improve Cd binding to the cell wall by increasing its contents of pectin and hemicellulose 2 [31]. Furthermore, Se(II) treatment increased Cd content in the soluble fraction, which may be related to chelation of excess metals with cytosolic ligands (Figure 6). Most Cd in plants is combined with sulfur in sulfur-containing organisms. Se and sulfur are both oxygen-group elements, and have similar chemical properties [32]. Therefore, Se may combine with Cd by replacing sulfur to form a less mobile complex that is accessible to occlusion in the vacuole, thereby inhibiting Cd’s mobility [33]. This might suggest that Se(II) can alleviate Cd toxicity by altering the subcellular distribution of Cd. However, there is no significant difference in the mitigation effect of Se on Cd between the two Brassica species.
Under Cd stress, the redox balance in plant cells is destroyed and large amounts of ROS accumulate, which produces oxidative stress [14]. The exogenous addition of Se significantly inhibited Cd-induced oxidative stress by the increase in the concentrations of H2O2, O2−, and MDA (Figure 3). Similar evidence that Se played a favorable role in inhibiting plant oxidative stress under Cd stress has been observed previously [34,35]. Se(II) treatment significantly counteracted the increase in H2O2 and O2− levels induced by Cd, compared to treatments of Se(VI) and Se(IV) (Figure 3). This may be related to the different amounts of Cd accumulation in Brassica seedlings. In addition, plants develop enzymatic systems to scavenge ROS in cells and oxidative damage, maintaining the redox balance under Cd stress [36]. Se(II) treatment can catalyze O2−∙disproportionation to produce H2O2, which can be further degraded to completely non-toxic H2O and O2 to defend against cell membrane lipid peroxidation [37]. Figure 4 provides strong evidence that different Se treatments (especially Se(II) treatment) could effectively counteract the changes of Cd-induced antioxidant enzymes [38,39].
Chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange are considered to be important indicators of plant response to heavy metal stress [40,41,42]. Under Cd-alone treatment, photoinhibition of Brassica plants occurs, causing the reaction center of PSII to be inactivated or destroyed, thereby inhibiting photosynthesis. Se can alleviate Cd-mediated inhibition on photosynthesis of two Brassica species, especially Se(II) (Table 1). This may be related to Se(II), as Se(II) can increase antioxidant capacity of some enzymes to enhance the plant’s resistance to Cd stress [43]. In addition, toxic metals damage the antenna molecules and diminish the chlorophyll fluorescence [42,44]. PSII’s overall photosynthetic capacity was diminished under Cd-alone treatment in this study, but supplementation of Se reduced the Cd-induced disruption in photosynthetic apparatus. After Se supplementation, Brassica seedlings enable non-optical energy consumption for self-protection and alleviate Cd-induced damage to photosynthesis. Consistent with this, Se supplementation could improve Cd-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in mustard and tomato [45,46].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Experimental Design

Seeds of Brassica napus (cultivar Zhongshuang 11) and Brassica juncea (cultivar Yongbao 2) were sterilized, and vernalized with 2 mg/L of gibberellin at 4 °C for 3 days. The seeds germinated on moist filter paper in the dark at 25 °C for 3–4 days, and were sown in culture medium (1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution with 0.25% agar powder) in an artificial controlled chamber with a 16 h day/8 h night at 25 °C/18 °C cycle, relative humidity 70%, and light intensity of 100 μmol m−2 s−1. When the true leaf was fully expanded, similar size seedlings were transplanted to a plastic container and cultured in 1/2 Hoagland-Arnon nutrient solution.
On two weeks after transplanting, we applied CdCl2, Na2SeO4 [Se(VI)], Na2SeO3 [Se(IV)] and Se-Met [Se(II)] to the corresponding containers: (1) Control (CK: without Cd or Se); (2) Cd, 50 μmol/L CdCl2; (3) Cd + Se(VI), 3 μmol/L Na2SeO4 + 50 μmol/L CdCl2; (4) Cd + Se(IV), 3 μmol/L Na2SeO3 + 50 μmol/L CdCl2; (5) Cd + Se(II), 3 μmol/L Se-Met + 50 μmol/L CdCl2. Plant samples were collected after two weeks of treatment and were used for various biochemical assays (each with four replicates).

4.2. Plant Growth, Biomass, and Element Determination

The shoot and root were separated and washed thoroughly with deionized water, and then the samples were oven-dried at 75 °C for 2 days until constant weight was achieved, to determine the DWs of the shoot and the root. The shoot and root of Brassica seedlings that have been baked to constant weights were ground into a powder. Approximately 0.3 g samples were digested by a microwave system (MWD-500, Metash instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) in a mixed acid containing HNO3/HClO4 (v/v:4/1), and then sequentially diluted to 50 mL. Concentrations of Cd and Se were determined using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (7900, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

4.3. Histochemical Staining and Determination of H2O2, O2−, and Lipid Peroxidation

Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) and 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) were used to examine visible superoxide (O2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in plant leaves [47]. After sampling, leaves were stained with NBT (0.5 mg/mL) and DAB (2 mg/mL) for 2 h and 8 h, respectively. Leaves were bleached in boiling 95% ethanol. Superoxide content was quantitated, as described by Chen et al. [39]. H2O2 content was quantitated by the hydroxylamine method [41]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content was determined using thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) [48].

4.4. Determination of Antioxidant Enzyme Activity

The fresh samples were homogenized with 5 mL of extractant [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) with 20% glycerin, 1 mM of ascorbic acid (AsA), 1 mM of dithiothreitol (DTT), and 1 mM of glutathione (GSH)] using pre-chilled mortar and pestle. The homogenate was centrifuged at 20,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected for testing. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined by nitroblue tetrazolium [49]; catalase (CAT) activity was determined by UV spectrometry method [50]; and peroxidase (POD) activity was determined by guaiacol method [51].

4.5. Determination of Photosystem Parameters and Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Photosynthetic indicators were determined using a portable photosynthetic apparatus (LI-6400; LICOR, Lincoln, NE, USA), and the measurement times were selected from 9:00 am to 11:00 am. The measurement parameters included net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (Tr).
The treated Brassica seedlings were placed in the dark for 30 min. The fluorescence parameters of Brassica leaves were determined by IMAGING-PAM (Heinz-Walz Instruments, Effeltrich, Germany) at room temperature. The parameters determined in this study included maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ).

4.6. Subcellular Distribution of Cd

Gradient centrifugation technique was used for subcellular separation of Cd [52]. The fresh sample tissues were ground in a 50 mM Tris-HCL buffer (pH 7.5) containing 0.25 M of sucrose and 1.0 mM dithioerythritol. The supernatant was centrifuged at 3000× g for 15 min, and the retained pellet was the cell wall fraction (Fcw). The supernatant solution was further centrifuged (12,000× g, 30 min), and the resultant deposition was the organelle-containing fraction (Fco). The remaining supernatant was the soluble fraction (Fs). The metal concentrations were determined as described above.

4.7. Data Analysis

The data were statistically analyzed by Duncan test with SPSS 20.0 (IBM Research, New York, NY, USA), and all diagrams were drawn using OriginPro 8 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). The data were the average of the three replicates.

5. Conclusions

Although Se treatments slightly reduced Cd concentrations in Brassica seedling, they tripled or quadrupled the Cd accumulation level per plant, because the dry weight increased about four times more under Se + Cd co-treatment than under Cd treatment alone. Among the different valence states of Se, Se(II) had the most marked effect on alleviating Cd toxicity, as evidenced by promoting growth and inhibiting Cd accumulation. The application of Se(II) was effective in reducing Cd-induced reactive oxygen species accumulation, and promoted the antioxidant enzyme activities and photosynthetic activities. At the subcellular level, Se(II) treatment increased the concentrations of Cd in the cell wall and soluble fractions, but decreased Cd level in the organelle fraction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y. and Z.-W.Z.; methodology, Y.-Y.D., Z.-W.Z. and L.-Y.F.; formal analysis, Y.-Y.D., L.-Y.F., Z.-L.D., Q.X. and Q.T.; investigation, C.-Q.W., Y.-E.C. and M.Y.; data curation, Y.-Y.D. and S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-Y.D. and S.Y.; writing—review and editing, all authors; supervision, C.-Q.W.; funding acquisition, S.Y. and Z.-W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770322) to S.Y., the Project of Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team (20CXTD0062) to S.Y. and the Applied Basic Research Program of Sichuan Province (20YYJC4388) to Z.-W.Z.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for providing linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AsAascorbic acid
BJBrassica juncea
BNBrassica napus
CATcatalase
CdCadmium
Ciintercellular carbon dioxide concentration
DAB3,3-diaminobenzidine
DTTdithiothreitol
DWdry weight
Fcoorganelle part fraction
Fcwcell wall fraction
Fssoluble fraction
Fv/Fmmaximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII
Gsstomatal conductance
GSHglutathione
ICP-MSinductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
MDAmalondialdehyde
NBTnitro blue tetrazolium
NPQnon-photochemical quenching
Pnnet photosynthetic rate
PODperoxidase
PSIIphotosystem II
SeSelenium
SODsuperoxide dismutase
TBARSthiobarbituric acid-reactive substances
Trtranspiration rate
ΦPSIIactual photochemical efficency

References

  1. Alkorta, I.; Hernándezallica, J.; Becerril, J.M.; Amezaga, I.; Albizu, I.; Garbisu, C. Recent findings on the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with environmentally toxic heavy metals and metalloids such as zinc, cadmium, lead, and arsenic. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biol. 2004, 3, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, L.; Hao, X.H.; Tian, L.F.; Dai, X.J.; Liang, M.Z.; Li, D.P.; Chen, L.B. Research progresses on the mechanism of Cd absorption, transport and accumulation in plant. Life Sci. Res. 2015, 4, 515–517. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moral, R.; Gomez, I.; Pedreno, J.N.; Mataix, J. Effects of cadmium on nutrient distribution, yield, and growth of tomato grown in soilless culture. J. Plant Nutr. 1994, 17, 953–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shah, K.; Kumar, R.G.; Verma, S.; Dubey, R.S. Effect of cadmium on lipid peroxidation, superoxide anion generation and activities of antioxidant enzymes in growing rice seedlings. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 1135–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wangstrand, H.; Eriksson, J.; Born, I. Cadmium concentration in winter wheat as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Eur. J. Agron. 2007, 26, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Q.; Lu, X.; Guo, X.; Pan, Y.; Yu, B.; Tang, Z.; Qing, G. Differential responses to cd stress induced by exogenous application of Cu, Zn or Ca in the medicinal plant. Cathar. Roseus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 157, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nawaz, F.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Ahmad, R.; Waraich, E.A.; Shabbir, R.N.; Bukhari, M.A. Supplemental selenium improves wheat grain yield and quality through alterations in biochemical processes under normal and water deficit conditions. Food Chem. 2015, 175, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Saidi, I.; Chtourou, Y.; Djebali, W. Selenium alleviates cadmium toxicity by preventing oxidative stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Dong, Y.; Chai, Z. Mercury modulates Selenium activity via altering its accumulation and speciation in garlic (Allium sativum). Metallomics 2013, 5, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feng, R.; Wei, C.; Tu, S.; Ding, Y.; Song, Z. A dual role of Se on Cd toxicity: Evidences from the uptake of Cd and some essential elements and the growth responses in paddy rice. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 151, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, L.; Zhou, W.; Dai, H.; Cao, F.; Zhang, G.; Wu, F. Selenium reduces cadmium uptake and mitigates cadmium toxicity in rice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 235–236, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sharma, V.K.; Mcdonald, T.J.; Sohn, M.; Anquandah, G.A.K.; Pettine, M.; Zboril, R. Assessment of toxicity of selenium and cadmium selenium quantum dots: A review. Chemosphere 2017, 188, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dechun, S.; Huanzhong, H. The phytoremediation potential of oilseed rape (B. juncea) as a hyperaccumulator for cadmium contaminated soil. J. Environ. Sci. 2002, 22, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  14. D’Alessandro, A.; Taamalli, M.; Gevi, F.; Timperio, A.M.; Zolla, L.; Ghnaya, T. Cadmium stress responses in Brassica juncea: Hints from proteomics and metabolomics. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 4979–4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ginneken, L.V.; Meers, E.; Guisson, R.; Ruttens, A.; Elst, K.; Tack, F.M.G.; Vangronsveld, J.; Diels, L.; Dejonghe, W. Phytoremediation for heavy metal-contaminated soils combined with bioenergy production. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. 2007, 15, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Dresler, S.; Wójcik, M. Selenium affects physiological parameters and phytochelatins accumulation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) plants grown under cadmium exposure. Sci. Horticult. 2014, 172, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mozafariyan, M.; Shekari, L.; Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Kamelmanesh, M.M. Protective role of selenium on pepper exposed to cadmium stress during reproductive stage. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 160, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Malik, J.A.; Kumar, S.; Thakur, P.; Sharma, S.; Kaur, N.; Kaur, R.; Pathania, D.; Bhandhari, K.; Kaushal, N.; Singh, K.; et al. Promotion of growth in mungbean (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.) by Selenium is associated with stimulation of carbohydrate metabolism. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 143, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pennanen, A.; Xue, T.L.; Hartikainen, H. Protective role of selenium in plant subjected to severe UV irradiation stress. J. Appl. Bot. Angew. Bot. 2015, 76, 66–76. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shanker, K.; Mishra, S.; Srivastava, S.; Srivastava, R.; Daas, S.; Prakash, S.; Srivastava, M.M. Effect of selenite and selenite on plant uptake and translocation of mercury by tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Plant Soil 1996, 183, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, Z.; Liu, S.; Zhao, J.; Wang, F.; Du, Y.; Zou, S.; Lia, H.; Wen, D.; Huang, Y. Comparative responses to Silicon and Selenium in relation to antioxidant enzyme system and the glutathione-ascorbate cycle in flowering Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis var. utilis) under cadmium stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 133, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, L.H.; Shi, W.M.; Wang, X.C. Difference in Selenium accumulation in shoots of two rice cultivars. Pedosphere 2006, 5, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Banuelos, G.S.; Fakra, S.C.; Walse, S.S.; Marcus, M.A.; Yang, S.I.; Pickering, I.J.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Freeman, J.L. Selenium accumulation, distribution, and speciation in spineless prickly pear cactus: A drought- and salt-tolerant, Selenium-enriched nutraceutical fruit crop for biofortified foods. Plant Physiol. 2010, 155, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Persson, D.P.; Chen, A.; Aarts, M.G.M.; Salt, D.E.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Husted, S. Multi-element bioimaging of Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 835–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Tamaoki, M.; Freeman, J.L.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Cooperative ethylene and jasmonic acid signaling regulates selenite resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 1219–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Terry, N.; Zayed, A.M.; Souza, M.P.D. Selenium in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2000, 51, 401–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gomes, M.A.D.; Hauser-Davis, R.A.; Suzuki, M.S.; Vitória, A.P. Plant Chromium uptake and transport, physiological effects and recent advances in molecular investigations. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2017, 140, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lai, H.Y. Subcellular distribution and chemical forms of cadmium in impatiens walleriana in relation to its phytoextraction potential. Chemosphere 2015, 138, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cobbett, C.S. Phytochelatins and their roles in heavy metal detoxification. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 825–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhu, X.F.; Wang, Z.W.; Dong, F.; Lei, G.J.; Shi, Y.Z.; Li, G.X.; Zheng, S.J. Exogenous auxin alleviates cadmium toxicity in Arabidopsis thaliana by stimulating synthesis of hemicellulose 1 and increasing the cadmium fixation capacity of root cell walls. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 263, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, Y.Y.; Hu, C.X.; Wu, Z.C.; Liu, X.W.; Cai, M.M.; Jia, W.; Zhao, X.H. Selenium reduces cadmium accumulation in seed by increasing cadmium retention in root of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 158, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. DalCorso, G.; Farinati, S.; Maistri, S.; Furini, A. How plants cope with cadmium: Staking all on metabolism and gene expression. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 1268–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mendoza-Cozatl, D.G.; Jobe, T.O.; Hauser, F.; Schroeder, J.I. Long-distance transport, vacuolar sequestration, tolerance, and transcriptional responses induced by cadmium and arsenic. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Filek, M.; Keskinen, R.; Hartikainen, H.; Szarejko, I.; Janiak, A.; Miszalski, Z.; Golda, A. The protective role of Selenium in rape seedlings subjected to cadmium stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tang, H.; Liu, Y.; Gong, X.; Zeng, G.; Zheng, D.; Wang, D.; Sun, Z.; Zhou, L.; Zeng, X. Effects of selenium and silicon on enhancing antioxidative capacity in ramie (Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud) under cadmium stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 9999–10008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mishra, S.; Srivastava, S.; Tripathi, R.D.; Kumar, R.; Seth, C.S.; Gupta, D.K. Lead detoxification by coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum L.) involves induction of phytochelatins and antioxidant system in response to its accumulation. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 1027–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ahmad, P.; Abd Allah, E.F.; Hashem, A.; Sarwat, M.; Gucel, S. Exogenous application of Selenium mitigates cadmium toxicity in Brassica juncea L. (Czern & Cross) by Up-regulating antioxidative system and secondary netabolites. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 35, 936–950. [Google Scholar]
  39. Qing, X.; Zhao, X.; Hu, C.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, P.; Wang, P.; Shi, H.; Jia, F.; et al. Selenium alleviates chromium toxicity by preventing oxidative stress in cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp pekinensis) leaves. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2015, 114, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Küpper, H.; Parameswaran, A.; Leitenmaier, B.; Trtílek, M.; Šetlík, I. Cadmium-induced inhibition of photosynthesis and long-term acclimation to cadmium stress in the hyperaccumulator. Thlaspi Caerulescens. New Phytol. 2007, 175, 655–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.E.; Cui, J.M.; Yang, J.C.; Zhang, Z.W.; Yuan, M.; Song, C.; Yang, H.; Liu, H.M.; Wang, C.Q.; Zhang, H.Y.; et al. Biomonitoring heavy metal contaminations by moss visible parameters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 296, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, Y.E.; Mao, H.T.; Wu, N.; Khan, A.; Din, A.M.U.; Ding, C.B.; Zhang, Z.W.; Yuan, S.; Yuan, M. Different tolerance of photosynthetic apparatus to Cd stress in two rice cultivars with the same leaf Cd accumulation. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2019, 41, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, M.; Bijo, A.J.; Baghel, R.S.; Reddy, C.R.K.; Jha, B. Selenium and spermine alleviate cadmium induced toxicity in the red seaweed Gracilaria dura by regulating antioxidants and DNA methylation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 51, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mallick, N.; Mohn, F.H. Use of chlorophyll fluorescence in metal-stress research: A case study with the green microalgae Scenedesmus. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2003, 55, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahanger, M.A.; Wijaya, L.; Alam, P.; Bhardwaj, R.; Ahmad, P. Selenium mitigates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants by modulating chlorophyll fluorescence, osmolyte accumulation, and antioxidant system. Protoplasma 2017, 255, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khan, N.A.; Asgher, M.; Per, T.S.; Masood, A.; Fatma, M.; Khan, M.I.R. Ethylene potentiates sulfur-mediated reversal of cadmium inhibited photosynthetic responses in mustard. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yang, Y.; Qi, M.; Mei, C. Endogenous salicylic acid protects rice plants from oxidative damage caused by aging as well as biotic and abiotic stress. Plant J. 2004, 40, 909–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Djanaguiraman, M.; Prasad, P.V.V.; Seppanen, M. Selenium protects sorghum leaves from oxidative damage under high temperature stress by enhancing antioxidant defense system. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 48, 999–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, X.; Peng, K.; Wang, A.; Lian, C.; Shen, Z. Cadmium accumulation and distribution in populations of Phytolacca americana L. and the role of transpiration. Chemosphere 2010, 78, 1136–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Esfandiari, E.O.; Shakiba, M.R.; Mahboob, S.A.; Alyari, H.; Toorchi, M. Water stress, antioxidant enzyme activity and lipid peroxidation in wheat seedling. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2015, 5, 149–153. [Google Scholar]
  51. Verma, S.; Mishra, S.N. Putrescine alleviation of growth in salt stressed Brassica juncea by inducing antioxidative defense system. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, J.; Yuan, J.; Yang, Z.; Huang, B.; Zhou, Y.; Xin, J.; Gong, Y.L.; Yu, H. Variation in cadmium accumulation among 30 cultivars and cadmium subcellular distribution in 2 selected cultivars of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk). J. Agr. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 8942–8949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 09 00904 g001 550
Figure 1. Dry mass variation in shoot and root of Brassica seedlings were exposed to five treatments (1) control, (2) 50 μmol/L Cadmium (Cd), (3) 3 μmol/L Na2SeO4 + 50 μmol/L Cd, (4) 3 μmol/L Na2SeO3 + 50 μmol/L Cd, (5) 3 μmol/L Selenium (Se)-Met + 50 μmol/L Cd. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Dry mass variation in shoot and root of Brassica seedlings were exposed to five treatments (1) control, (2) 50 μmol/L Cadmium (Cd), (3) 3 μmol/L Na2SeO4 + 50 μmol/L Cd, (4) 3 μmol/L Na2SeO3 + 50 μmol/L Cd, (5) 3 μmol/L Selenium (Se)-Met + 50 μmol/L Cd. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 00904 g001
Plants 09 00904 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of different treatments on Cd and Se content in the shoot and root of Brassica seedlings, DW: dry weight. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effects of different treatments on Cd and Se content in the shoot and root of Brassica seedlings, DW: dry weight. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 00904 g002
Plants 09 00904 g003 550
Figure 3. H2O2 and O2− staining in shoot and root after Cd and Se experiment. H2O2, O2−, and malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation in Brassica seedlings. FW: fresh weight. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. H2O2 and O2− staining in shoot and root after Cd and Se experiment. H2O2, O2−, and malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation in Brassica seedlings. FW: fresh weight. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 00904 g003
Plants 09 00904 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of Cd and exogenous Se application on the superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) in the shoot and root of two Brassica species. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Effects of Cd and exogenous Se application on the superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) in the shoot and root of two Brassica species. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 00904 g004
Plants 09 00904 g005 550
Figure 5. ChlorophyII fluorescence parameters maximum photochemical quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv/Fm), actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of Brassica juncea (BJ) and Brassica napus (BN) under different treatments. Representative fluorescence images of different treatments are shown on the left panel. Quantitative values are shown on the right panel. Fv/Fm, the maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry in the dark-adapted state; ΦPSII, the quantum yield of PSII electron transport; NPQ, the non-photochemical quenching coefficient. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. ChlorophyII fluorescence parameters maximum photochemical quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv/Fm), actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of Brassica juncea (BJ) and Brassica napus (BN) under different treatments. Representative fluorescence images of different treatments are shown on the left panel. Quantitative values are shown on the right panel. Fv/Fm, the maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry in the dark-adapted state; ΦPSII, the quantum yield of PSII electron transport; NPQ, the non-photochemical quenching coefficient. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 00904 g005
Plants 09 00904 g006 550
Figure 6. Percentage of Cd content in subcellular distribution of root and shoot in the two Brassica species. Fcw, cell wall fraction; Fs soluble fraction, Fco, organelle part fraction. The percentages are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 6. Percentage of Cd content in subcellular distribution of root and shoot in the two Brassica species. Fcw, cell wall fraction; Fs soluble fraction, Fco, organelle part fraction. The percentages are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Plants 09 00904 g006
Table
Table 1. Photosynthesis of two Brassica species under the different treatments. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Table 1. Photosynthesis of two Brassica species under the different treatments. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
MaterialsTreatmentsPn
(μmol m−2 s−1)		Gs
(mmol m−2 s−1)		Ci
(mmol m−2 s−1)		Tr
(μmol m−2 s−1)
BJCK14.36 ± 0.03b1.08 ± 0.08a399.68 ± 1.51e1.45 ± 0.03d
Cd6.59 ± 0.01i0.16 ± 0.00f374.63 ± 0.50f0.77 ± 0.00g
Cd + Se(VI)9.37 ± 0.06g0.68 ± 0.01d434.11 ± 0.06c2.54 ± 0.02a
Cd + Se(IV)12.95 ± 0.06d0.77 ± 0.05c349.80 ± 1.50h2.18 ± 0.04d
Cd + Se(II)13.32 ± 0.00c0.49 ± 0.01e373.08 ± 0.42fg1.99 ± 0.00c
BNCK16.85 ± 0.02a0.04 ± 0.00e442.03 ± 0.12b2.20 ± 0.00b
Cd5.77 ± 0.01j0.12 ± 0.01f400.25 ± 2.42e0.24 ± 0.02h
Cd + Se(VI)8.89 ± 0.06h0.96 ± 0.01b423.74 ± 0.37d1.32 ± 0.00e
Cd + Se(IV)11.49 ± 0.09f0.14 ± 0.00f371.07 ± 2.41g1.22 ± 0.02f
Cd + Se(II)12.00 ± 0.04e0.73 ± 0.00c492.57 ± 0.14a1.97 ± 0.00c
Pn, net photosynthetic rate; Gs, stomatal conductance; Ci, intercellular carbon dioxide concentration; Tr, transpiration rate.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.-W.; Dong, Y.-Y.; Feng, L.-Y.; Deng, Z.-L.; Xu, Q.; Tao, Q.; Wang, C.-Q.; Chen, Y.-E.; Yuan, M.; Yuan, S. Selenium Enhances Cadmium Accumulation Capability in Two Mustard Family Species—Brassica napus and B. juncea. Plants 2020, 9, 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070904

AMA Style

Zhang Z-W, Dong Y-Y, Feng L-Y, Deng Z-L, Xu Q, Tao Q, Wang C-Q, Chen Y-E, Yuan M, Yuan S. Selenium Enhances Cadmium Accumulation Capability in Two Mustard Family Species—Brassica napus and B. juncea. Plants. 2020; 9(7):904. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070904

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zhong-Wei, Yi-Ying Dong, Ling-Yang Feng, Zong-Lin Deng, Qiang Xu, Qi Tao, Chang-Quan Wang, Yang-Er Chen, Ming Yuan, and Shu Yuan. 2020. "Selenium Enhances Cadmium Accumulation Capability in Two Mustard Family Species—Brassica napus and B. juncea" Plants 9, no. 7: 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070904

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop