Next Article in Journal
Phytoremediation Potential of Crop Plants in Countering Nickel Contamination in Carbonation Lime Coming from the Sugar Industry
Next Article in Special Issue
Why Seed Physiology Is Important for Genebanking
Previous Article in Journal
Arabidopsis in the Wild—The Effect of Seasons on Seed Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
DNA Fingerprinting and Species Identification Uncovers the Genetic Diversity of Katsouni Pea in the Greek Islands Amorgos and Schinoussa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Germination after 30 Years Storage in Permafrost

1
Faculty of Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, NO-2418 Elverum, Norway
2
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, NIBIO, P.O. Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway
3
The Faculty of Landscape Planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Sciences has Six Departments, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
4
Kimen Seed Laboratory, P.O. Box 164, NO-1431 Ås, Norway
5
Nordic Genetic Resource Center, Box 41, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
6
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen University, Højbakkegaard Allé 13, DK2630 Taastrup, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(5), 579; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050579
Submission received: 13 April 2020 / Revised: 28 April 2020 / Accepted: 29 April 2020 / Published: 2 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Biodiversity and Genetic Resources)

Abstract

:
More than 30 years ago, the Nordic Gene Bank established a long-term experiment on seeds stored under permafrost conditions in an abandoned mine corridor in Svalbard, as a tool to monitor storage life under these conditions. The study included seeds from 16 Nordic agricultural and horticultural crops, each represented by two or three cultivars (altogether 38 accessions). All seeds were ultra-dried to 3–5% moisture before being sealed in glass tubes. Germination tests were performed in accordance with the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) protocols. At the initiation of the experiment, the samples showed good germination with the median value at 92%. The overall picture remained stable over the first twenty to twenty-five years. However, the variation became larger over time and at 30 years, the median value had dropped to 80%. At the lower end, with a high drop in germination, we found rye, wheat, and English ryegrass. At the upper end, we found Kentucky bluegrass and cucumber. The lowest germination was found in samples with the highest initial seed moisture levels. Pre-storage conditions are likely to be of major importance for longevity.

1. Introduction

Most food plants produce seeds that can be stored under low temperature and moisture conditions. Much of our knowledge on seed longevity is based on artificial ageing experiments, where seeds are exposed to suboptimal conditions of elevated temperature and moisture for some weeks, and storage life is predicted based on the seed moisture content, storage temperature, and seed lot characters [1,2]. Such calculations have predicted that high-quality seeds could survive ideal conditions for hundreds of years or more [3,4], which was good news for many gene banks, but might be unrealistic as such studies have rarely been confirmed in long-term storage studies. Long-term seed storage is crucial for ex situ gene bank conservation [5,6,7]. Gene banks maintain crop diversity and facilitate the utilization of seeds for breeding, research, education, and other purposes [8,9,10,11]. Safety back-ups are kept, ideally at a second location, to spread the risks [12,13]. The Global Seed Vault at the Arctic Archipelago of Svalbard was opened in 2008 and is facilitating such back-up collections with a world outreach [14]. However, more than twenty years before this, the Nordic Gene Bank (NGB) started a small seed storage facility in an abandoned coalmine corridor in Svalbard. Different options had been considered, such as inland ice caves in Greenland or mountain caves in Jotunheimen, Norway, but in the end, a coalmine in the permafrost in Svalbard was chosen due to its good logistics, despite its remote location [15]. The temperature of the Global Seed Vault in Svalbard was −18 °C compared to the −3.5 °C present in the abandoned coalmine corridor. The rock temperature was stable, which meant that it was independent of an external energy supply. As a tool to monitor storage life under these permafrost conditions, a long-term seed storage experiment was initiated. The experiment started in 1986 and included samples for germination monitoring until 2086, thus it was termed “the 100 year experiment”. Important crops for Nordic agriculture and horticulture were included. The investigation is still ongoing, and in this paper, we summarize the results after the first 30 years.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Overall Patterns

The overall picture of seed germination development over storage time across all accessions (species and cultivars) is illustrated by boxplots (Figure 1). A lower and upper percentile defines the box, in which 75% of the observations were found. A marked line denotes the median germination value, and the whiskers and small circles show observations away from the box. At the initiation of the experiment in 1986 (year 0 = y0), most of the seed lots showed an excellent germination ability. The box-range was from 83% to 95%, and the median was at 92% germination. The overall picture was relatively stable over the first twenty to twenty-five years, but the variation increased over time as some seed lots showed a reduced germination. After 30 years, the median value across all the lots was 80%, but with outlier samples below 40%, and some of the lots in the 50–70% range.
Figure 2 shows a dendrogram of a cluster analysis of the germination results of the accessions. The dissimilarity values of the fusion level values of the dendrogram indicated the cutting level six clusters to be correct. The largest cluster, cluster 1, contained 19 lots. It contained both normal and lots with seed-borne pathogens (i-prefix lots). Also, cluster 2 contained both normal and seed-borne pathogens, as did cluster 6. In cluster 1 we found Barley 1, Ryegrass 1, Ryegrass 2, Timothy 2, Bluegrass 2, Redclover 2, Rape 1, Rape 2, Onion 1, Onion 2, Carrot 1, Carrot 2, Cauliflower 2, i1 Wheat, i2 Wheat, i Barley, i Meadow_fescue, i Onion, and i Cabbage. In cluster two, we found Barley 2, Bluegrass 1, Beet 2, Lettuce, Cabbage, Cucumber 1, Cucumber 2, Cauliflower 1, and i-Timothy. In cluster three, we found Wheat 1, Timothy 1, Redclover 1, and i Carrot. In cluster 4, we found Wheat 2. In cluster 5, we found Rye 1 and Rye 2. In cluster 6, we found Beet 1, i Lettuce, and i Beet. Lots with seed-borne pathogens (i-prefix lots) were spread over the clusters, showing that such pathogens do not explain much of the seed longevity. Furthermore, seed lots of the same species were only partly in the same clusters; for example, the two cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) lots and the two rye (Secale cereale L.) lots. This also shows that interspecies differences are not of importance for explaining seed longevity.
The seeds of all the species remained viable after 30 years in permafrost under the given conditions (dried to 3–5% moisture content and stored in sealed glass ampoules). Crops, but also cultivars, within the same crops showed different results. Similar patterns have also been observed in other long-term experiments, both under ambient [16,17] or −18 °C conditions [18,19,20,21]. The cold storage of seeds should provide improved longevity compared to ambient storage [22]. Another factor of importance is seed maturation [23,24].
For instance, the potential seed longevity of barley was found to be best if it was harvested a week or so after grain filling was completed [25]. The same has been found in tomatos (Solanum lycopersicum L. var. lycopersicum) [26]. Furthermore, weather, seed coat damages, diseases, and pests may influence seed storage life [24,27]. In our experiment, the samples were all from newly harvested seeds, but we do not have data on the weather or other pre-harvest conditions. We only assume that the seed lots selected for the experiment were of a high quality.

2.2. Crop-Wise Results

Our results show good performance for many of the vegetables, while the picture is more varied for cereals and forage species (Figure S1). Table 1 gives the germination result for each seed lot. According to the FAO’s gene bank standard [13], “regeneration shall be carried out when the viability drops below 85 percent of the initial viability or when the remaining seed quantity is less than what is required for three sowings of a representative population of the accession.” Seed lots with the highest loss in germination, here defined as a loss in 15% or more over the 30 years, were found in both of the rye lots, two of the three English ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) lots (Ryegrass 1, Ryegrass 2), two out of four wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lots (Wheat 1, Wheat 2), one of the three timothy (Phleum pratense L.) lots (Timothy 1), one of the three barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) lots (Barley 1), and in the one seed lot of meadow fescue (Schedonorus pratensis (Huds.) P. Beauv.). The literature shows that especially rye, but also some forage grasses, can be relatively short-lived [28,29,30,31]. Intermediate storage performance, with a 5–15% loss in germination over the 30-year period, was found in two of the three lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) lots (i Lettuce, Lettuce 2), two of the three carrot (Daucus carota subsp. sativus (Hoffm.) Schübl & G. Martens) lots (Carrot 2, i-Carrot), one of the four wheat lots (i1-Wheat), one of the three barley lots (Barley 2), one of the three timothy lots (Timothy 2), one of the two cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) lots (Cauliflower 2), one of the two oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) lots (Rape 1), and one out of the three red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) lots (Redclover 1). The most long-lived, with a loss in germination less than 5% after 30 years of storage, were found in all of the three beet (Beta vulgaris L.) lots, all of the three onion (Allium cepa L.) lots, both of the cucumber lots, both of the Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) seed lots, the only cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) seed lot, and in the last of the red clover, cauliflower, barley, wheat, oilseed rape, carrot, and lettuce seed lots. Other studies have also shown that beet seeds as well as cucumber seeds have retained a high germination level over time, but, in contrast to our study, onions are generally found to be short-lived [17,18,19,29,30,31]. Our results are a little surprising as we found that onion, and to some extent lettuce, showed no decline in germination over the 30-year period.

2.3. Moisture Measurements

For all samples, the variation between the highest and lowest moisture content over the ten years was between 0.3% and 0.8% (Table 2). The data showed that two lots had a higher moisture content exceeding 5% in the initial test; these were the samples Wheat 2 ‘Solid’, with 6.3% humidity, and Rye 1 ‘Petkus II’, with 5.3% humidity. For wheat, one seed lot showed a low decline, and two seed lots showed a steep decline in germination. Different pre-harvest conditions or genetic factors may explain a steep decline in germination. We saw an effect of drying the seeds to lower than 5% internal moisture content before packing. The two samples with the highest internal humidity (Wheat 2 and Rye 1) were among the ones that showed the most significant drop in germination in our experiment. The current FAO standards [13], which are used by most gene banks, recommend drying for three months at 15 °C and 15% RH. According to our experience, this would give a seed moisture content exceeding 5%, thus decreasing the longevity.

3. Conclusions

The study has so far revealed valuable results concerning the longevity of seeds after 30 years in permafrost. Nine out of the 38 seed lots showed a germination loss exceeding 15%, which is the level recommended by the FAO for carrying out regeneration. Rye and ryegrass in particular showed a rapid decline, while many of the vegetables showed a low decline in germination. The results are relevant for the seeds in the first Nordic back-up collection stored in the abandoned coalmine. A given storage condition is an essential characteristic for comparing results with other experiments. Here, seeds were stored in permafrost with a stable sub-zero temperature. We had no reference material at −18 °C conditions. Despite the limited number of samples and the lack of a −18 °C control, the observations add knowledge about the longevity of seeds.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Seed Samples and Seed Storage

In total, 38 seed lots covering 16 crops were included in the study (Table 3). Each species was represented by two to four seed lots, except for cabbage and meadow fescue, which had only one. The seed lot ID was given by crop name and code. A number after the crop name (1 or 2) refers to seed lots where we have no information on seed-borne diseases. A prefix “i” letter applies to seed lots where we know that seed-borne diseases were present.
The lots were from different cultivars and origins. No cultivation details are available except that the seed lots should be of good quality. Initial germination tests were conducted (y0). Before storage, all the seeds were dried to 3–5% internal moisture content using a Munters (Kista, Sweden) dehumidifier adjusted to 10% RH in a room at 25 °C. After that, they were placed in a freezer overnight before they were sealed in glass ampoules. Each seed lot was divided into sub-samples of 2 × 500 seeds for each withdrawal. The sub-samples were boxed and labelled with the date for withdrawal, transported to Longyearbyen, Svalbard, and placed in the abandoned coalmine corridor. The temperature inside the coalmine was measured as −3.5 °C (± 0.2 °C).

4.2. Germination Studies

The first set of samples was tested in December 1986 (year 0), with a plan to have the last tests in 2086 (year 100). Since the start of the experiment, 11 boxes have been retrieved. The moisture content of the seed was monitored from year 0 to year 10 (Table 4). The germination tests and the moisture content tests were carried out at the Kimen Seed Laboratory (Ås, Norway). The testing followed the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) rules [32,33]. The details of the germination conditions for the different species in the study are shown in Table 5. In the case of oilseed rape and onion, the number of days to final count was, however, larger than the number of days in the ISTA protocols. In accordance with the protocols, we germinated 4x100 or 8x50 seeds per sample and each replicate was compared to the mean. If a large variation was detected, the samples were re-tested. Different types of filter paper (Seedburo Equipment Co, Des Plaines, IL, USA) were used as substrates for the germination tests.
For cereals, in-between paper methods (BP) were used; the seeds were placed on one moist paper with a second paper on top, and thereafter rolled and placed vertically in plastic. Inside the roll, the seeds germinated, and the seedlings developed. For grasses, red clover, and vegetables (except for beet), a Jacobsen apparatus was used [34], which is a plate where circular pieces of wet filter paper and seeds are placed and kept moist by a wick (TP). The seeds of beet were germinated between humidified pleated filter paper. The germination temperature varied from alternating between +20 °C for 16 h and +30 °C for 8 h to constant ambient temperatures. Lettuce required light for germination, but for the other species light was not applied. Tests of actual moisture content were made along with seed germination tests in year 0 and the first 10 years (Table 2).

4.3. Data Analyses

R software was used for statistical examination. One value was missing for year 5 for red clover (cultivar Jokioinen). It was replaced with the average of the four nearest neighbor values: 76.0%. The short descriptor names of the eleven test results are year 0, year 2.5, year 5, year 7.5, year 10, year 12.5, year 15, year 17.5, year 20, year 25, and year 30, where year 0 represents the results of the trial that started in 1986. Summary statistics and boxplots were used to overview the data. The R function ‘time series’ was used to illustrate the fluctuation of the results over the 11 test occasions over the first 30 years. We calculated the loss in germination (Δ germ) by averaging the germination percentage of the three first test occasions (y0, y2.5, and y5) minus the test occasion at y30. We then categorized the samples into three: the most short-lived group (with Δ germ of 15% or more, which is at a level where regeneration should have been carried out), the intermediate group (Δ germ 5% to 15%), and the most long-lived (Δ germ less than 5%, or with less than 95% germination loss over the 30 years).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/5/579/s1, Figure S1: Illustration of germination for each seed lot included in the trial.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Y.; Methodology, G.B., F.Y., and E.M.; Formal analysis, F.Y.; Investigation, S.Ø.S. and F.Y.; Resources, Å.A.; Data curation, F.Y.; Writing—Original draft preparation, S.Ø.S.; Writing—Review and editing, C.A., Å.A., G.B., and R.v.B.; Visualization, F.Y.; Supervision, Å.A. and R.v.B.; Project administration, Å.A.; Funding acquisition, S.Ø.S. and Å.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We also thank the Nordic Joint Committee for Food and Agricultural Research for network funds to publish the results from the first 30 years of the long-term experiment (Grant number SLU 202100-2817).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani for the seed storage and for organizing transport. A special thanks to the technical staff at the Kimen Seed Laboratory/Norwegian State Seed Testing Station for the exact and laborious germination and moisture tests, and to H. Tangerås who administered, and was responsible for, the laboratory work for most of the 30 years. We would also like to honor the Norwegian Ministry of Agriculture and Food and the Nordic Gene Bank/NordGen staff involved in this long-term seed trial.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ellis, R.H.; Roberts, E.H. Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Ann. Bot. 1980, 45, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Priestley, D.A. Seed Aging: Implications for Seed Storage and Persistence in the Soil; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  3. Roos, E.E. Precepts of successful seed storage. In Physiology of Seed Deterioration, Special Publication no. 11; McDonald, M.B., Nelson, C., Eds.; Crop Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1986; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellis, R.H. The longevity of seeds. HortScience 1991, 26, 1119–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Frankel, O.; Hawkes, J. Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1975; 492p. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pistorius, R. Scientists, Plants and Politics – A History of the Plant Genetic Resources Movement; International Board for Plant Genetic Resources: Rome, Italy, 1997; 134p. [Google Scholar]
  7. FAO. The Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. Plucknett, D.L.; Smith, N.J.H.; Williams, J.T.; Anishetty, N.M. Gene Banks and the World’s Food; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  9. Harlan, J.R. The Living Fields. Our Agricultural Heritage; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1995; 273p. [Google Scholar]
  10. Walters, C. Principles for preserving germplasm in genebanks. In Ex Situ Plant Conservation: Supporting Species Survival in the Wild; Guerrant, E., Havens, K., Maunder, M., Eds.; Island Press: Covelo, CA, USA, 2004; pp. 442–453. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fowler, C.; Hodgkin, T. Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: Assessing global availability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2004, 29, 143–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Frankel, O. Genetic resources: The founding years. Part IV: After twenty years. Diversity 1987, 3, 25–27. [Google Scholar]
  13. FAO. Genebank Standards for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. Westengen, O.T.; Jeppson, S.; Guarino, L. Global ex-situ crop diversity conservation and the Svalbard Global Seed Vault: Assessing the current status. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yndgaard, F. Genebank security storage in permafrost. Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 1985, 62, 2–7. [Google Scholar]
  16. Priestley, D.A.; Cullinan, V.I.; Wolfe, J. Differences in seed longevity at the species level. Plant Cell Environ. 1985, 8, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nagel, M.; Börner, A. The longevity of crop seeds stored under ambient conditions. Seed Sci. Res. 2010, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rincker, C.M. Germination of forage crop seeds after 20 years of subfreezing storage. Crop Sci. 1983, 23, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roos, E.E.; Davidson, D.A. Record longevities of vegetable seeds in storage. HortScience 1986, 27, 393–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Walters, C.; Wheeler, L.; Grotenhuis, J.M. Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: Species characteristics. Seed Sci. Res. 1992, 15, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Desheva, G. The longevity of crop seeds stored under long-term condition in the national gene bank of Bulgaria. Agriculture (Polnohospodárstvo) 2016, 62, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Cromarty, A.S.; Ellis, R.H.; Roberts, E.H. The Design of Seed Storage Facilities for Genetic Conservation; International Board for Plant Genetic Resources: Rome, Italy, 1982; 96p. [Google Scholar]
  23. Austin, R.B. Effect of environment before harvesting on viability. In Viability of Seeds; Roberts, E.H., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1972; pp. 114–149. [Google Scholar]
  24. Justice, O.L.; Bass, L.N. Principles and Practices of Seed Storage; USDA Handbook on Agriculture No. 506; USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 1978; 289p.
  25. Pieta Filho, C.; Ellis, R.H. The development of seed quality in spring barley in four environments. I. Germination and longevity. Seed Sci. Res. 1991, 1, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dias, D.C.F.S.; Ribeiro, F.P.; Dias, L.A.S.; Silva, D.J.H.; Vidigal, D.S. Tomato seed quality in relation to fruit maturation and post-harvest storage. Seed Sci. Technol. 2006, 34, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rao, N.K.; Dulloo, M.E.; Engels, J.M.M. A review of factors that influence the production of quality seed for long-term conservation in genebanks. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017, 64, 1061–1074. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nagel, M.; Arif, M.A.R.; Rosenhauer, M.; Börner, A. Longevity of Seeds—Intraspecific Differences in the Gatersleben Genebank Collections; Tagung der Pflanzenzüchter und Saatgutkaufleute Österreichs, Lehr- und Forschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft Raumberg-Gumpenstein: Irdning, Austria, 2010; Volume 60, pp. 179–181. [Google Scholar]
  29. Steiner, A.; Ruckenbauer, P. Germination of 110-year-old cereal and weed seeds, the Vienna Sample of 1877. Verification of effective ultra-dry storage at ambient temperature. Seed Sci. Res. 1995, 5, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Probert, R.; Adams, J.; Coneybeer., J.; Crawford, A.; Hay, F. Seed quality for conservation is critically affected by pre-storage factors. Australian J. Bot. 2007, 55, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nagel, M.; Vogel, H.; Landjeva, S.; Buck-Sorlin, G.; Lohwasser, U.; Scholz, U.; Börner, A. Seed conservation in ex situ genebanks-genetic studies on longevity in barley. Euphytica 2009, 170, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. ISTA. International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol. 1985, 13, 299–355. [Google Scholar]
  33. ISTA. International Rules for Seed Testing; International Seed Testing Association: Basserdorf, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  34. ISTA. International rules for seed testing, Chapter 5. In The Germination Tests; International Seed Testing Association: Basserdorf, Switzerland, 2011; p. 16. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Boxplots showing the germination percentages across species and cultivars throughout the first thirty years (year 0, year 2.5, year 5, year 7.5, year 10, year 12.5, year 15, year 17.5, year 20, year 25, and year 30).
Figure 1. Boxplots showing the germination percentages across species and cultivars throughout the first thirty years (year 0, year 2.5, year 5, year 7.5, year 10, year 12.5, year 15, year 17.5, year 20, year 25, and year 30).
Plants 09 00579 g001
Figure 2. The dendrogram of a cluster analysis of the germination results of the seed lots.
Figure 2. The dendrogram of a cluster analysis of the germination results of the seed lots.
Plants 09 00579 g002
Table 1. Germination percentages for all the seed lots (values below 70% in bold), and loss in germination (Δ germ) over the first 30 years, calculated by averaging the germination percentage of the three first test occasions (year 0, year 2.5, and year 5) minus the last test occasion (year 30).
Table 1. Germination percentages for all the seed lots (values below 70% in bold), and loss in germination (Δ germ) over the first 30 years, calculated by averaging the germination percentage of the three first test occasions (year 0, year 2.5, and year 5) minus the last test occasion (year 30).
Storage Years
Seed Lot ID02.557.51012.51517.5202530Δ Germ
Barley 19596969695919595799076−20%
Barley 29594969794919794939286−9%
i Barley9089949492828988858588−3%
Wheat 17575838380857776715857−21%
Wheat 27052898982867976644037−33%
i1 Wheat8985898988848787878280−8%
i2 Wheat9083919389878589848387−1%
Rye 17674848474575143363029−49%
Rye 28178878374676159564948−34%
Ryegrass 19996969695939388857459−38%
Ryegrass 29695979596939492948769−27%
Timothy 17377776979717368636342−34%
Timothy 29091938990928892858178−13%
i Timothy9495929692949592949192−2%
Bluegrass 19295959797969594929392−2%
Bluegrass 29491899693919490928988−3%
iMeadow fescue9290898688908781816954−36%
Red clover 17574768075746876687368−7%
Red clover 29394949289918989909190−4%
Beet 17979716076727570807078 0%
Beet 29797979797989495959897 0%
i Beet7878697781818082827977 0%
Rape 19594959690919090929187−8%
Rape 28484838785848482888281−3%
Onion 19292929390898988919091−1%
Onion 28994929291949294909289−3%
i Onion9293878788908591878888−3%
Lettuce 19895989898929998989999 0%
Lettuce 29793969094979393929290−5%
i Lettuce8480788076717877737574−7%
Cucumber 199999999999999991009898−1%
Cucumber 29394949597929695929290−4%
Carrot 19290939089918689889091−1%
Carrot 29193948688908589908981−12%
i Carrot7673727471756778657168−6%
Cauliflower 19593949898989894969491−3%
Cauliflower 29592949594929092939079−15%
i Cabbage8782858586828682807680−5%
Table 2. Seed moisture content (in %) in the different lots over the first ten years of the experiment.
Table 2. Seed moisture content (in %) in the different lots over the first ten years of the experiment.
Storage Years
Seed Lot02.5 5.07.510Max/Min
Barley 15.04.74.64.74.85.0/4.6
Barley 24.64.64.34.34.74.7/4.3
Wheat 14.04.34.34.34.34.3/4.0
Wheat 26.35.85.55.85.86.3/5.5
Rye 15.35.14.95.15.25.3/4.9
Rye 24.94.74.44.74.84.9/4.4
Beet 13.74.34.33.74.14.3/3.7
Beet 23.53.73.63.93.53.9/3.5
Cucumber 13.03.53.62.82.93.6/2.8
Cucumber 12.83.32.72.82.73.3/2.7
Table 3. Overview of the examined crops and sample information. A prefix number refers to the samples with no information on seed-borne diseases, while a prefix i-letter refers to the samples where we detected seed-borne diseases to be present at the start of the experiment.
Table 3. Overview of the examined crops and sample information. A prefix number refers to the samples with no information on seed-borne diseases, while a prefix i-letter refers to the samples where we detected seed-borne diseases to be present at the start of the experiment.
Crop/SpeciesSample ID and Cultivars (Country of Origin)
Barley (Hordeum vulgare)1 = Inga Abed (DNK), 2 = Tunga (NOR), i = Bamse (NOR)
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)1 = Vakka (FIN), 2 = Solid (SWE), i1 = Runar (NOR), i2 = Line 79 CBW A72 (CAN)
Rye (Secale cereale)1 = Petkus II (DNK), 2 = Voima (DNK)
English ryegrass (Lolium perenne)1 = Pippin (DNK), 2 = Riikka (FIN)
Timothy (Phleum pratense)1 = Tammisto (FIN), 2 = Bodin (NOR), I = Forus (NOR)
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis)1 = Hankkijan Kyösti (FIN), 2 = Annika (DNK)
Meadow fescue (Schedonorus pratensis)I = Salten (NOR)
Red clover (Trifolium pratense)1 = Jokioinen (FIN), 2 = Molstad (NOR)
Beet (Beta vulgaris)1 = 311 N typ (SWE), 2 = 70500 (DNK)2, i = Hilma (GBR)
Oilseed rape (Brassica napus)1 = Jupiter (SWE), 2 = Linrama (DNK)
Onion (Allium cepa)1 = Hamund (SWE), 2 = Owa (DNK), i = Laskala (NOR)
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa)1 = Attraktion Sana (DNK), 2 = Hilro (SWE), i = Attractie (NLD)
Cucumber (Cucumis sativus)1 = Langelands gigant (DNK), 2 = Rhensk Druv (SWE)
Carrot (Daucus carota)1 = Nantes Fancy (DNK), 2 = Regulus (SWE), I = Forto Nantes (NLD)
Cauliflower (B. oleracea v. botrytis)1 = Svavit (SWE), 2 = Pari (DNK)
Cabbage (Brassica oleracea)I = Trønder Lunde (NOR)
Table 4. Dates of the retrieval of the samples over the first 30 years, and types of tests conducted.
Table 4. Dates of the retrieval of the samples over the first 30 years, and types of tests conducted.
YearDateGerminationMoisture
01986, DecemberXX
2.5 1989, JuneXX
51991, DecemberXX
7.5 1994, JuneXX
101996, DecemberXX
12.5 1999, JuneX
152001, DecemberX
17.52004, JuneX
202006, December X
252011, DecemberX
302016, DecemberX
Table 5. Germination conditions for the different crops included in the experiment.
Table 5. Germination conditions for the different crops included in the experiment.
Crop/SpeciesGermination
Substrate
Temperature
(°C)
Final Count
(Day Number)
BarleyBP207
WheatBP208
Rye BP207
English ryegrassTP20<=>3014
TimothyTP15<=>2510
Kentucky bluegrassTP15<=>2528
Meadow fescueTP20<=>3014
Red cloverTP2010
BeetPP2014
Oilseed rapeTP20103
OnionTP15144
LettuceTP20-light7
CucumberTP20<=>308
CarrotTP2014
Cauliflower, cabbageTP20<=>3010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Solberg, S.Ø.; Brodal, G.; von Bothmer, R.; Meen, E.; Yndgaard, F.; Andreasen, C.; Asdal, Å. Seed Germination after 30 Years Storage in Permafrost. Plants 2020, 9, 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050579

AMA Style

Solberg SØ, Brodal G, von Bothmer R, Meen E, Yndgaard F, Andreasen C, Asdal Å. Seed Germination after 30 Years Storage in Permafrost. Plants. 2020; 9(5):579. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Solberg, Svein Øivind, Guro Brodal, Roland von Bothmer, Eivind Meen, Flemming Yndgaard, Christian Andreasen, and Åsmund Asdal. 2020. "Seed Germination after 30 Years Storage in Permafrost" Plants 9, no. 5: 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop