Next Article in Journal
Spinach Plants Favor the Absorption of K+ over Na+ Regardless of Salinity, and May Benefit from Na+ When K+ is Deficient in the Soil
Previous Article in Journal
The Plasma Membrane—An Integrating Compartment for Mechano-Signaling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Micropropagation Protocol for the Conservation of the Endangered Aloe peglerae, an Ornamental and Medicinal Species

by
Nontobeko A. Hlatshwayo
1,2,
Stephen O. Amoo
1,*,
Joshua O. Olowoyo
2 and
Karel Doležal
3
1
Agricultural Research Council—Vegetable and Ornamental Plants, Private Bag X293, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
2
Department of Biology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, P. O. Box 139, Medunsa 0204, South Africa
3
Laboratory of Growth Regulators & Department of Chemical Biology and Genetics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palacký University & Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(4), 506; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040506
Submission received: 23 January 2020 / Revised: 8 March 2020 / Accepted: 11 March 2020 / Published: 14 April 2020

Abstract

:
A number of Aloe species are facing an extremely high risk of extinction due to habitat loss and over-exploitation for medicinal and ornamental trade. The last global assessment of Aloe peglerae Schönland (in 2003) ranked its global conservation status as ‘endangered’ with a decreasing population trend. In the National Red List of South African Plants, the extremely rapid decline of this species has resulted in its conservation status being elevated from ‘endangered’ to ‘critically endangered’ based on recent or new field information. This dramatic decline necessitates the development of a simple, rapid and efficient micropropagation protocol as a conservation measure. An in vitro propagation protocol was therefore established with the regeneration of 12 shoots per shoot-tip explant within 8 weeks using Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2.5 µM meta-topolin riboside (an aromatic cytokinin). The rooting of the shoots with a 100% frequency on half-strength MS medium without any plant growth resulted in additional six shoots produced per cultured shoot. The resultant plantlets were successfully acclimatized with a 100% survival frequency after 6 weeks. Overall, the developed protocol can result in the production of 3906 transplantable shoots that are ready for rooting per annum from a single shoot-tip explant. It is simple and efficient for seedling production in the ex situ cultivation and conservation of the endangered A. peglerae.

1. Introduction

The succulent Aloe genus (Asphodelaceae) comprises of over 500 recognized species distributed throughout the world in different growth forms, ranging from very small shrubs to large trees [1,2]. Majority of the species are distributed on the African continent [3], especially in the southern and eastern regions, with high centers of diversity in South Africa (±155 Aloe species) and Madagascar (±145 Aloe species) [4]. According to Raimondo et al. [5], there are about 125 Aloe species indigenous to South Africa, many of which are known for their medicinal and/or ornamental values [2,6]. Medicinally, Aloe species are traditionally used in the treatment of injuries, infections, digestive ailments, inflammation, arthritis, insect bites and as a laxative, amongst others [1,2,3]. Thus, due to their increasing rarity and trade demand amongst other factors, all Aloe species with the exception of Aloe vera are included at least in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora [7] for their protection.
Of the 125 indigenous South Africa Aloe species, Raimondo et al. [5] listed five species as ‘critically endangered’ in the National Red List of South African Plants while four species were listed as ‘endangered’ and 15 species ranked as ‘vulnerable’, based on the International Union of Conservation of Nature (IUCN) criteria. An updated National Red List of South African Plants however, indicated that there are now seven species ranked as ‘critically endangered’, five species listed as ‘endangered’, and 14 species considered to be ‘vulnerable’ based on the IUCN criteria [8]. Thus, it is very clear that a number of Aloe species are facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild, with a negative outlook. One of the species with a recent change in status in the National Red List of South African Plants, from being ‘endangered’ to ‘critically endangered’ based on recent or new field information is Aloe peglerae Schönland [8]. It is an endemic, ornamental and medicinal species used in the treatment of infections, burns, wound healing and as a laxative [9,10,11]. Based on its last global assessment in 2003, Aloe peglerae global conservation status is ranked as ‘endangered’, with a decreasing population trend [12]. It is threatened by illegal collection of mature plants and habitat loss due to urbanization [13,14]. Being a slow-growing species, its wild harvesting, even at very low levels, is unsustainable [14]. The ability of the known populations to recover from the ongoing, rapid population decline is hampered by high levels of seed harvesting for horticultural trade [13,14,15]. The extremely rapid decline of this species necessitates the implementation of effective conservation measures to ensure its survival and sustainable use. Its ex situ cultivation has been recommended as a conservation measure [13]. Availability of sufficient propagules/seedlings for large-scale cultivation in order to sustainably meet its growing demand is, however, another bottleneck. Amoo et al. [2] recommended the use of biotechnological tools such as micropropagation techniques as a conservation strategy for the sustainable use of threatened Aloe species or those in high demand. The aim of the current study was therefore to develop a simple, rapid and efficient micropropagation protocol for Aloe peglerae. To our knowledge, there was no such protocol prior to this report.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. In Vitro Seed Germination and Explant Bulking

Aloe peglerae seeds purchased from Silverhill Seeds (Cape Town, South Africa) were surface-decontaminated using 70% ethanol for 60 s followed by the use of 3.5% sodium hypochlorite solution containing a few drops of Tween® 20 [16] for 3 min. Following surface decontamination, the seeds were cultured on one-tenth strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [17]. Bulking up of plant material for shoot proliferation experiments was achieved using in vitro raised shoot-tips cultured on MS medium supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose, 0.1 g L−1 myo-inositol, 7.5 µM meta-topolin (mT) and 2.5 µM indole butyric acid (IBA) [16]. All the growth media used were adjusted to a pH of 5.7 using NaOH or HCl. The media were solidified with 0.8% agar prior to autoclaving at 121 °C and 103 kPa for 20 min. Cultures were incubated in a growth room illuminated by cool, white fluorescent tubes (Osram® L 36 W/640, 47 µmol m−2 s−1 light intensity) at 25 ± 2 °C and alternating 16:8 h light/dark.

2.2. Effect of Cytokinin Types and Concentrations on Shoot Multiplication

After bulking sufficient shoot-tip explants (Figure 1), shoot proliferation experiments were conducted. Four different cytokinins; Kinetin, 6-benzyladenine (BA), meta-topolin (mT) and meta-topolin riboside (mTR), each at 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 and 15.0 µM concentrations were evaluated for their shoot multiplication potential. Both mT and mTR were obtained from the Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Palacký University and Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Republic. All other growth regulators used were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Johannesburg, South Africa). The MS medium without any plant growth regulator (PGR), which was the basal medium, was used as the control. The experiment was set up in a completely randomized design. One explant was cultured on 40 mL of medium contained in each jam jar. Each treatment had a total of 20 explants and the experiment was conducted twice. Cultures were incubated under the previously stated growth conditions above. Shoot proliferation parameters such as the total number of shoots per explant, number of shoots less than 1.0 cm in length, number of shoots greater than or equal to 1.0 cm in length, frequency of rooting, and shoot fresh weight were recorded after eight weeks of culture.

2.3. Effects of the Interaction of Auxin and Cytokinin on Shoot Proliferation

A completely randomized experiment involving four indole-butyric acid (IBA) concentrations (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 µM) in combination with 2.5 µM mTR was conducted. The choice of cytokinin type and concentration used at this stage was based on the results from the first shoot multiplication experiment. Each treatment had a total of 20 explants with one explant cultured on 40 mL of medium contained in each jam jar. The experiment was conducted twice. Culture incubation and data collection after eight weeks of incubation were the same as stated above.

2.4. Rooting and Acclimatization

Regenerated shoots greater than 1.0 cm in length were carefully separated and cultured on half-strength MS medium supplemented with different concentrations (0.0, 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0 µM) of IBA or naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) in order to determine the effect of auxins on in vitro rooting. Cultures were incubated for six weeks under the same growth conditions stated previously. At the end of the six weeks culturing period, the following parameters were recorded: the number of roots per cultured shoot, rooting frequency, the length of the longest root, and number of additional shoots produced. Agar was carefully washed off the rooted shoots and the shoots planted in pots containing a 1:2 (v:v) mixture of sand and soil for acclimatization in a glasshouse. The survival frequencies of the acclimatized plantlets were recorded weekly for six weeks.

2.5. Extraction and Determination of Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents

Upon completion of each in vitro shoot proliferation experiment, the total phenolic and flavonoid contents of the resultant shoots were quantified. The plant materials were oven-dried at 50 °C before grinding to fine powders. Thereafter, the extraction method described by Makkar [18] was followed. Ground plant materials (0.2 g) were extracted with 10 mL of 50% aqueous methanol in a sonication bath for 20 min. Total phenolic content was quantified using the slightly modified Folin and Ciocalteu method as outlined by Fawole et al. [19]. The calibration curve was plotted using gallic acid as a standard and each determination done in triplicate. Total phenolic content was expressed in mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g dry weight (DW). The flavonoid content was determined using the aluminum chloride colorimetric method described by Zhishen et al. [20]. Catechin was used as a standard for plotting the calibration curve and each determination done in triplicate. Flavonoid content was expressed in mg catechin equivalents (CE) per g DW.

2.6. Data Analysis

The data obtained were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS statistical software (version 16.0). Significant differences were established at p = 0.05 and the mean values were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

3. Results

3.1. Shoot Proliferation

The effect of different cytokinin types and concentrations on adventitious shoot production, total phenolic and flavonoid contents are shown in Table 1. All the cytokinin types and concentrations, with the exception of 15 µM BA, mT and mTR as well as 10 µM BA, significantly increased shoot production when compared to the control (PGR-free) treatment. Shoot proliferation (Figure 1) decreased with an increase in cytokinin concentration. Overall, the MS medium supplemented with 2.5 µM mTR significantly gave the highest number of shoots per explant (12.17 shoots), which was six-fold of the shoot number produced in the control treatment. Similarly, an increase in cytokinin concentration gave a decrease in the number of shoots ≥ 1 cm in length. At the lowest cytokinin concentration, both mT and mTR treatments provided significantly highest number of shoots ≥ 1 cm in length when compared to all other treatments. The total phenolic and flavonoid contents of the regenerants varied significantly with cytokinin concentrations. Specifically, the total phenolic contents of all regenerants from mT (except 10 µM mT), mTR, and Kinetin treatments were significantly high when compared to the total phenolic content of regenerated shoots from the control treatment. On the other hand, none of the regenerants from BA treatments had significantly high total phenolic content, compared to the control treatment. Similarly, the flavonoid content of the regenerants from Kinetin (5 to 15 µM), mT (5, 10 and 15 µM), and mTR (2.5 to 7.5 µM) were significantly high compared to that of the control, whereas almost none of the regenerants obtained from BA treatments (except 2.5 µM) gave a significantly improved flavonoid content. Table 2 shows the effect of combining auxin concentrations with the optimum cytokinin concentration on shoot production, total phenolic and flavonoid contents. The inclusion of different auxin concentrations did not significantly increase shoot production, total phenolic and flavonoid contents.

3.2. Rooting and Acclimatization

Culturing regenerated shoots on half-strength MS growth medium containing no auxin gave the highest, desirable rooting frequency (Table 3). This same treatment resulted in a high number of roots per shoot, length of longest root, and number of additional shoots produced. On the other hand, the treatments with NAA gave low rooting frequency (Table 3). The number of roots produced per shoot, the length of the longest root and the number of additional shoots produced with all the NAA treatments were significantly low when compared to the control and some IBA treatments (Table 3). Increasing the concentration of IBA resulted in an increase in the number of roots per shoot and additional shoot production. However, none of the IBA treatments significantly improved rooting and additional shoot production when compared to the control.
Following the acclimatization of the rooted plants (Figure 1), Table 4 shows their survival frequencies up to the sixth week. Only plants rooted in half-strength MS medium without auxin supplementation consistently gave a 100% survival frequency throughout the six weeks. All plantlets rooted with NAA treatments died after the first week while the survival frequencies of plantlets rooted with IBA treatments declined over the six weeks.

4. Discussion

A simple, efficient in vitro propagation protocol was developed in this study using shoot-tip explants from in vitro raised seedling. The use of in vitro raised explants is advantageous for culture initiation as it reduces the common micropropagation challenge relating to culture contamination. Following culture initiation, the choice of cytokinin type and concentration is often a critical success factor in establishing an efficient micropropagation protocol for any plant species. Thus, we evaluated the effect of different concentrations of two commonly used cytokinins in plant tissue culture techniques (BA and Kinetin) and two naturally occurring hydroxylated derivatives of BA (mT and mTR). Many researchers have demonstrated several advantages associated with the use of meta-topolins in developing efficient propagation protocols for different plant species including Aloe arborescens Mill., Aloe ferox Mill. and Aloe polyphylla Pillans [16,21,22,23,24,25,26]. In the current study, both mT and mTR at the lowest concentration proved to be more efficient for in vitro shoot proliferation of A. peglerae. At equimolar optimal concentration (2.5 µM), the order of cytokinin efficiency for shoot proliferation in this study can be ranked as mTR > mT > Kinetin > BA (Table 1).
In the micropropagation of Artemisia amygdalina Decne., a medicinally important species, Rasool et al. [27] reported a synergistic effect of auxins and cytokinins on shoot multiplication. Furthermore, Amoo and van Staden [28] indicated the potential amplifying effect of auxins on shoot proliferation when combined with the meta-topolins. Thus, we evaluated the effect of combining IBA concentrations with 2.5 µM mTR, being the optimum cytokinin concentration for multiple shoot production. Although there were increases in shoot proliferation with some auxin concentrations, these increases were not statistically significant (Table 2). Thus, our results indicated that further medium supplementation with IBA did not significantly improve shoot proliferation. Similarly, the combination of IBA or NAA with Zeatin or BA did not significantly improve shoot proliferation in Aloe polyphylla [29].
Culturing regenerated shoots on half-strength MS medium is an acclimatization step during the rooting phase. IBA treatments significantly enhanced rooting in comparison to the NAA treatments. (Table 3). IBA is known to be capable of slowly releasing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), a more easily metabolized auxin whereas the stability and persistence of NAA in plant tissues can result in root growth inhibition [30]. This stability and persistence of NAA in the plant tissues might also alter or tilt the auxin:cytokinin ratio in the plant tissue to such a point that the ratio becomes less favorable for additional shoot production as observed with the NAA treatments. On the other hand, the use of half-strength medium alone was more favorable for rooting as it gave high rooting frequency, number of roots, number of additional shoots produced during rooting, and the longest root (Table 3). Similarly, Chukwujekwu et al. [29] reported best rooting results when regenerated Aloe polyphylla shoots were cultured on PGR-free MS medium. Root production without exogenous auxin application may be due to a sufficiently balanced production of endogenous auxin in the shoot apex, which is basipetally transported to the cut surface [31], favoring root growth and additional shoot production.
The survival rate of in vitro produced plantlets under field conditions is one of the critical success factors in the development of an efficient micropropagation protocol [32]. The results from the current study indicate that in vitro rooting treatments can have an impact on the survival frequency of regenerated plants. The highest survival frequency was recorded with plants rooted in PGR-free medium whereas those rooted in medium containing NAA did not survive beyond the first week of acclimatization. Thus, rooting in PGR-free medium is cost-saving and efficient for high survival frequency of regenerated plantlets.
As with other Aloe species, the bioactive secondary metabolites in A. peglerae are present mainly in the leaves [33,34,35]. Studies have shown that bioactive secondary metabolites can be influenced or altered by plant growth regulators applied during in vitro propagation stages [28,36,37]. In the current study, the choice of cytokinin and their concentrations significantly affected secondary metabolite production in A. peglerae leaf tissue, whereas the inclusion of auxin (IBA) concentrations did not markedly influence the secondary metabolite content of the regenerants. It is particularly noteworthy that the cytokinin treatment (2.5 µM mTR), which gave the best overall shoot production, also resulted in the regenerated shoots having higher secondary metabolite production when compared to the control treatment. Moreover, no morphological variation or abnormality was observed with the regenerated plants as the shoots were regenerated directly from the shoot-tips without an intervening callus phase and several subculture cycles that often predispose in vitro cultures to genetic variations [38,39,40].

5. Conclusions

Overall, this study established a simple, cost-effective, and highly efficient micropropagation protocol for the endangered Aloe peglerae. The superiority of aromatic cytokinins (mT and mTR) over the commonly used BA in adventitious shoot production was also demonstrated. High shoot multiplication rates were obtained at low cytokinin concentrations. Using a geometric progression that is based on the production of five transplantable shoots (shoots ≥ 1 cm in length) on medium containing 2.5 µM mTR and six possible multiplication cycles per annum, the developed multiplication protocol can result in the production of 3906 transplantable shoots that are ready for rooting per annum from a single shoot-tip explant. The rooting of these shoots using the developed protocol in this study can further result in the production of additional 19,530 shoots. Rooted plantlets were acclimatized with a high survival frequency, making this protocol efficient for seedling production in the ex situ cultivation and conservation of the endangered A. peglerae.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and experimental design, S.O.A.; experimentation and data collection, N.A.H; data analysis, S.O.A.; mT and mTR resources, K.D.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A.H.; writing—review and editing, S.O.A., J.O.O., K.D.; supervision, S.O.A., J.O.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Agricultural Research Council, South Africa, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University as well as by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic, ERDF project “Plants as a tool for sustainable global development” (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000827).

Acknowledgments

The ARC-VOP in vitro genebank staff members kindly provided access to necessary facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grace, O.M. Current perspective on the economic botany of the genus Aloe L. (Xanthorrhoeaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2011, 77, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Amoo, S.O.; Aremu, A.O.; van Staden, J. Unraveling the medicinal potential of South African Aloe species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 153, 19–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cousins, S.R.; Witkowski, E.T.F. Africa Aloe ecology: A review. J. Arid Environ. 2012, 85, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Klopper, R.R.; Smith, G.F. Aloe Genus. South African National Biodiversity Institute: Biosystematics Research & Biodiversity Collections Division 2010. Available online: http://pza.sanbi.org/aloe-genus (accessed on 10 October 2019).
  5. Raimondo, D.; Von Staden, L.; Foden, W.; Victor, J.E.; Helme, N.A.; Turner, R.C.; Kamundi, D.A.; Manyama, P.A. Red List of South African Plants, Strelitzia 25; South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI): Pretoria, South Africa, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Van Wyk, B.-E.; Smith, G.F. Guide to the Aloes of South Africa, 3rd ed.; Briza Publications: Pretoria, South Africa, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. CITES. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. 2019. Available online: https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/app/2019/E-Appendices-2019-11-26.pdf (accessed on 3 March 2020).
  8. SANBI. Red List of South African Plants. 2019. Available online: http://redlist.sanbi.org.www57.cpt1.host-h.net/genus.php?genus=2206 (accessed on 26 December 2019).
  9. Pfab, M.F.; Victor, J.E. Threatened plants of Gauteng, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2002, 68, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cock, I.E. The genus Aloe: Phytochemistry and therapeutic uses including treatments for gastrointestinal conditions and chronic inflammation. In Novel Natural Products: Therapeutic Effects in Pain, Arthritis and Gastro-intestinal Diseases; Rainsford, K., Powanda, M., Whitehouse, M., Eds.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 70, pp. 179–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. George, J.; Laing, M.D.; Drewes, S.E. Phytochemical research in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2001, 97, 93–105. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pfab, M.F.; Victor, J. Aloe peglerae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2003: E.T39586A10242961. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2003.RLTS.T39586A10242961.en (accessed on 30 December 2019).
  13. Pfab, M.F.; Scholes, M.A. Is the collection of Aloe peglerae from the wild sustainable? An evaluation using stochastic population modelling. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 118, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pfab, M.F.; van Staden, L.; Hahn, N. Aloe peglerae Schönland. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants Version 2017.1. Available online: http://redlist.sanbi.org/species.php?species=2206-198 (accessed on 24 January 2018).
  15. Phama, J.O.; Panagos, M.D.; Myburgh, W.J.; Pfab, M.F. The population status of the endangered endemic plant Aloe peglerae: Area of occupancy, population structure, and past population trends. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 93, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Amoo, S.O.; Aremu, A.O.; van Staden, J. In vitro plant regeneration, secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity of micropropagated Aloe arborescens Mill. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 111, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Makkar, H.P.S. A laboratory manual for the FAO/IAEA coordinated research project on ‘Use of nuclear and related techniques to develop simple tannin assay for predicting and improving the safety and efficiency of feeding ruminants on the tanniniferous tree foliage’. In Quantification of Tannins in Tree Foliage; Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture: Vienna, Austria, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fawole, O.A.; Ndhlala, A.R.; Amoo, S.O.; Finnie, J.F.; van Staden, J. Anti-inflammatory and phytochemical properties of twelve medicinal plants used for treating gastro-intestinal ailments in South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 123, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhishen, J.; Mengcheng, T.; Jianming, W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Werbrouck, S.P.O.; Strnad, M.; Van Onckelen, H.A.; Debergh, P.C. Meta-topolin, an alternative to benzyladenine in tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 1996, 98, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bogaert, I.; Van Cauter, S.; Werbrouck, S.P.O.; Doležal, K. New aromatic cytokinins can make the difference. Acta Hortic. 2006, 725, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bairu, M.W.; Stirk, W.A.; Doležal, K.; van Staden, J. Optimising the micropopagation protocol for the endangered Aloe polyphylla: Can meta-topolin and its derivatives serve as replacement for benzyladenine and zeatin? Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007, 90, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bairu, M.W.; Kulkarni, M.G.; Street, R.A.; Mulaudzi, R.B.; van Staden, J. Studies on seed germination, seedling growth, and in vitro shoot induction of Aloe ferox Mill., a commercially important species. HortScience 2009, 44, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Amoo, S.O.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. The role of meta-topolins in alleviating micropropagation problems. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 63, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aremu, A.O.; Bairu, M.W.; Doležal, K.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Topolins: A panacea to plant tissue culture challenges? Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 108, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rasool, R.; Ganai, B.A.; Kamili, A.N.; Akbar, S.; Masood, A. Synergistic effect of auxins and cytokinins on propagation of Artemisia amygdalina (Asteraceae), a critically endangered plant of Kashmir. Pak. J. Bot. 2013, 45, 629–634. [Google Scholar]
  28. Amoo, S.O.; Van Staden, J. Influence of plant growth regulators on shoot proliferation and secondary metabolite production in micropropagated Huernia hystrix. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2013, 112, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chukwujekwu, J.C.; Fennell, C.W.; van Staden, J. Optimisation of the tissue culture protocol for the endangered Aloe polyphylla. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2002, 68, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Epstein, E.; Lavee, S. Conversion of indole-3-butyric acid to indole-3-acetic acid by cuttings of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) and olive (Olea europea). Plant Cell Physiol. 1984, 25, 697–703. [Google Scholar]
  31. De Klerk, G.J.; Van Der Krieken, W.; De Jong, J.C. The formation of adventitious roots: New concepts, new possibilities. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 1999, 35, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amoo, S.O. Micropropagation and Medicinal Properties of Barleria greenii and Huernia hystrix. Ph.D. Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Heerden, F.R.; Van Wyk, B.-E.; Viljoen, A.M. Aloeresins E and F, two chromone derivatives from Aloe peglerae. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 867–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Viljoen, A.M.; Van Wyk, B.-E. The chemotaxonomic value of two cinnamoyl chromones, Aloeresin E and F, in Aloe (Aloaceae). Taxon 1999, 48, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gutterman, Y.; Chauser-Volfson, E. The distribution of the phenolic metabolites barbaloin, aloeresin and aloenin as a peripheral defense strategy in the succulent leaf parts of Aloe arborescens. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2000, 28, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dörnenburg, H.; Knorr, D. Strategies for the improvement of secondary metabolite production in plant cell cultures. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1995, 17, 674–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Amoo, S.O.; Aremu, A.O.; Van Staden, J. Shoot proliferation and rooting treatments influence secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity in tissue culture-derived Aloe arborescens grown ex vitro. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 70, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Srivatanakul, M.; Park, S.H.; Sanders, J.R.; Salas, M.G.; Smith, R.H. Multiple shoot regeneration of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) from a shoot apex culture system. Plant Cell Rep. 2000, 19, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bairu, M.W.; Stirk, W.A.; Doležal, K.; Van Staden, J. The role of topolins in micropropagation and somaclonal variation of banana cultivars ‘Williams’ and ‘Grand Naine’ (Musa spp. AAA). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2008, 95, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aremu, A.O.; Bairu, M.W.; Szüčová, L.; Doležal, K.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Genetic fidelity in tissue-cultured ‘Williams’ bananas—The effect of high concentration of topolins and benzyladenine. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 161, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. In vitro propagation of Aloe peglerae. (a) In vitro raised shoot-tip explants, (b) shoot proliferation, (c) rooting, and (d) acclimatization of in vitro regenerated plants.
Figure 1. In vitro propagation of Aloe peglerae. (a) In vitro raised shoot-tip explants, (b) shoot proliferation, (c) rooting, and (d) acclimatization of in vitro regenerated plants.
Plants 09 00506 g001
Table 1. Effects of cytokinin types and concentrations on adventitious shoot production and secondary metabolite production of Aloe peglerae after 8 weeks of culture.
Table 1. Effects of cytokinin types and concentrations on adventitious shoot production and secondary metabolite production of Aloe peglerae after 8 weeks of culture.
CytokininConcentration (µM)No. of Shoots Per Explant (n)No. of ShootsIndividual Regenerated Shoot Fresh Weight (mg)Rooting FrequencyTotal Phenolic Concentration (mg GAE/g DW)Flavonoid Concentration (mg CE/g DW)
<1 cm in Length≥1 cm in Length
Control0.02.00 ± 0.23 I 10.35 ± 0.15 h1.65 ± 0.19 cd943.01 ± 96.64 abcd88.24%13.41 ± 0.57 gh0.97 ± 0.12 hij
BA2.54.50 ± 0.70 efgh2.85 ± 0.53 bcdef1.65 ± 0.33 cd850.71 ± 133.52 bcd0%13.98 ± 0.23 g1.56 ± 0.27 ef
5.04.79 ± 0.69 cdefg3.16 ± 0.5 bcdef1.63 ± 0.38 cd702.93 ± 140.85 bcdef5.26%12.06 ± 0.06 i1.07 ± 0.34 hij
7.54.58 ± 0.53 defgh2.84 ± 0.37 bcdef1.74 ± 0.29 bcd1243.70 ± 162.55 a0%11.93 ± 0.19 i0.76 ± 0.11 j
10.03.50 ± 0.44 fghi2.00 ± 0.33 efg1.50 ± 0.27 d858.72 ± 115.07 bcd0%12.22 ± 0.33 i0.90 ± 0.05 hij
15.02.39 ± 0.40 hi1.06 ± 0.26 gh1.33 ± 0.20 d1272.60 ± 183.11 a0%12.79 ± 0.19 hi1.18 ± 0.21 fghi
Kinetin2.56.84 ± 0.55 cd3.58 ± 0.38 bcd3.26 ± 0.44 b309.79 ± 44.30 f78.95%22.51 ± 0.15 a1.29 ± 0.05 fgh
5.06.40 ± 0.72 cde3.30 ± 0.49 bcdef3.10 ± 0.56 bc401.86 ± 92.13 f55%22.55 ± 0.34 a1.51 ± 0.01 fg
7.55.55 ± 0.77 cdef3.00 ± 0.41 bcdef2.55 ± 0.52 bcd549.98 ± 98.62 def40%20.24 ± 0.51 bc2.55 ± 0.03 bc
10.05.40 ± 0.53 cdefg3.35 ± 0.36 bcdef2.05 ± 0.37 bcd425.94 ± 96.18 ef60%20.14 ± 0.58 c2.18 ± 0.02 cd
15.04.85 ± 0.51 cdefg2.90 ± 0.50 bcdef1.95 ± 0.35 bcd442.42 ± 80.88 ef15%22.11 ± 0.28 a2.18 ± 0.00 cd
mT2.59.20 ± 1.10 b3.75 ± 0.45 bc5.45 ± 0.99 a630.68 ± 85.61 cdef15%21.15 ± 0.36 b0.91 ± 0.06 hij
5.05.67 ± 0.78 cdef3.50 ± 0.52 bcde2.17 ± 0.41 bcd911.37 ± 168.46 abcd0%16.29 ± 0.33 f2.96 ± 0.07 a
7.54.45 ± 0.63 efgh2.60 ± 0.34 cdef1.85 ± 0.41 bcd816.85 ± 92.44 bcde0%19.23 ± 0.31 cd1.05 ± 0.04 hij
10.04.35 ± 0.42 efgh2.55 ± 0.32 cdef1.80 ± 0.27 bcd997.63 ± 211.50 abc0%10.22 ± 0.07 j2.25 ± 0.06 cd
15.03.24 ± 0.48 ghi1.88 ± 0.36 fg1.35 ± 0.24 d1036.50 ± 107.56 ab0%18.67 ± 0.23 d1.98 ± 0.04 d
mTR2.512.17 ± 1.27 a7.44 ± 0.91 a4.72 ± 0.84 a328.11 ± 32.53 f16.67%18.95 ± 0.16 d1.93 ± 0.06 de
5.06.90 ± 0.64 c4.15 ± 0.55 b2.75 ± 0.43 bcd562.80 ± 106.12 def20%19.40 ± 0.42 cd2.70 ± 0.11 ab
7.55.74 ± 0.67 cdef3.63 ± 0.53 bc2.10 ± 0.36 bcd705.71 ± 117.17 bcdef15.79%16.18 ± 0.42 f1.92 ± 0.06 de
10.06.25 ± 0.89 cde3.40 ± 0.39 bcdef2.85 ± 0.58 bcd582.63 ± 81.51 def0%19.46 ± 0.40 cd1.13 ± 0.19 ghij
15.03.85 ± 0.51 fghi2.10 ± 0.29 defg1.75 ± 0.35 bcd659.72 ± 84.88 bcdef10%17.69 ± 0.16 e0.77 ± 0.02 ij
1 Mean values within the same column followed by different letter(s) are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) based on Duncan Multiple Range Test.
Table 2. Effects of combining auxin concentrations with optimum cytokinin concentration on shoot production and secondary metabolite production of Aloe peglerae after 8 weeks of culture.
Table 2. Effects of combining auxin concentrations with optimum cytokinin concentration on shoot production and secondary metabolite production of Aloe peglerae after 8 weeks of culture.
TreatmentNo. of Shoots Per Explant (n)No. of ShootsIndividual Regenerated Shoot Fresh Weight (mg)Total Phenolic Concentration (mg GAE/g DW)Flavonoid Concentration (mg CE/g DW)
<1 cm in Length≥1 cm in Length
2.5 µM mTR + 0.0 µM IBA13.82 ± 1.63 ab 18.94 ± 1.14 a4.88 ± 1.21 a390.94 ± 61.57 a11.83 ± 0.27 a2.57 ± 0.07 ab
2.5 µM mTR + 1.0 µM IBA10.69 ± 1.24 b7.38 ± 1.27 a3.31 ± 0.90 a561.99 ± 222.40 a13.39 ± 1.69 a2.73 ± 0.08 a
2.5 µM mTR + 2.0 µM IBA16.71 ± 2.67 a9.78 ± 2.03 a6.92 ± 2.22 a429.92 ± 103.04 a12.17 ± 0.74 a2.27 ± 0.09 c
2.5 µM mTR + 5.0 µM IBA14.94 ± 1.93 ab7.56 ± 1.14 a7.38 ± 1.31 a537.52 ± 131.05 a14.70 ± 0.48 a2.35 ± 0.10 bc
1 Mean values within the same column followed by different letter(s) are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) based on Duncan Multiple Range Test.
Table 3. Effects of auxin concentrations on rooting of regenerated Aloe peglerae shoots after 6 weeks of culture.
Table 3. Effects of auxin concentrations on rooting of regenerated Aloe peglerae shoots after 6 weeks of culture.
AuxinConcentration (µM)No. of RootsPer ShootLength of Longest Root (cm)No. of Additional Shoots Produced Per Cultured ShootRooting Frequency (%)
Control0.0 µM9.00 ± 1.12 a 12.46 ± 0.22 a6.00 ± 0.76 a100
IBA1.0 µM6.60 ± 1.35 a1.90 ± 0.33 ab3.85 ± 0.87 b70
2.5 µM7.55 ± 1.67 a1.97 ± 0.39 ab3.35 ± 0.77 bc60
5.0 µM10.05 ± 2.71 a1.45 ± 0.28 bc4.75 ± 1.06 ab75
NAA1.0 µM1.75 ± 0.66 b0.85 ± 0.27 cd1.25 ± 0.34 d40
2.5 µM0.90 ± 0.28 b0.73 ± 0.23 cd1.70 ± 0.41 cd40
5.0 µM0.37 ± 0.21 b0.30 ± 0.17 d0.21 ± 0.12 d15
1 Mean values within the same column followed by different letter(s) are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) based on Duncan Multiple Range Test.
Table 4. Survival frequency of regenerated Aloe peglerae plantlets rooted with different auxin concentrations and acclimatized (n = 20) in a glasshouse.
Table 4. Survival frequency of regenerated Aloe peglerae plantlets rooted with different auxin concentrations and acclimatized (n = 20) in a glasshouse.
Auxin Type Used for RootingConcentration (µM)Survival Frequency (%)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
Control0.0 µM100100100100100100
IBA1.0 µM10010092929285
2.5 µM10010083756767
5.0 µM1009393878780
NAA1.0 µM10000000
2.5 µM10000000
5.0 µM10000000

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hlatshwayo, N.A.; Amoo, S.O.; Olowoyo, J.O.; Doležal, K. Efficient Micropropagation Protocol for the Conservation of the Endangered Aloe peglerae, an Ornamental and Medicinal Species. Plants 2020, 9, 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040506

AMA Style

Hlatshwayo NA, Amoo SO, Olowoyo JO, Doležal K. Efficient Micropropagation Protocol for the Conservation of the Endangered Aloe peglerae, an Ornamental and Medicinal Species. Plants. 2020; 9(4):506. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040506

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hlatshwayo, Nontobeko A., Stephen O. Amoo, Joshua O. Olowoyo, and Karel Doležal. 2020. "Efficient Micropropagation Protocol for the Conservation of the Endangered Aloe peglerae, an Ornamental and Medicinal Species" Plants 9, no. 4: 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040506

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop