Next Article in Journal
What Does the Molecular Genetics of Different Types of Restorer-of-Fertility Genes Imply?
Next Article in Special Issue
Feasible Production of Lignans and Neolignans in Root-Derived In Vitro Cultures of Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Trends in Seaweed Extract Based Biostimulants: Manufacturing Process and Beneficial Effect on Soil-Plant Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synergistic Effect of NaCl Pretreatment and PVP on Browning Suppression and Callus Induction from Petal Explants of Paeonia Lactiflora Pall. ‘Festival Maxima’
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Somatic Embryogenesis and Plantlet Regeneration in the Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika

1
Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2
Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, University Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(3), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030360
Submission received: 11 February 2020 / Revised: 8 March 2020 / Accepted: 9 March 2020 / Published: 12 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Tissue Culture)

Abstract

:
A highly efficient protocol for regeneration of Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika somatic embryos from immature zygotic embryos was developed. This study was designed to overcome the obstacles in regeneration of somatic embryos from immature zygotic embryos of “Eksotika”, especially problems associated with formation of better root quality and callus formation at the base of somatic embryos. Somatic embryos were generated by incubation of immature zygotic embryos in half-strength salt Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with full-strength vitamins supplemented with 7.5 mg L−1 2,4-D, 100 mg L−1 L-glutamine, 50 mg L−1 myo-inositol, 45 mg L−1 adenine sulphate, 0.33% gelrite, and 6% sucrose, followed by transfer to maturation medium consisting of ½ MS medium supplemented with 5 mg L−1 phloroglucinol, 100 mg L−1 L-glutamine, 100 mg L−1 myo-inositol, 68 mg L−1 adenine sulphate, 0.38% gelrite, and 3% sucrose. After that, well-formed somatic embryos were transferred to MS medium containing 3% sucrose and 0.8% agar for shoot production. The embryos were elongated in MS medium supplemented with 1 mg L−1 gibberellic acid, 0.5 mg L−1 indole-3-butyric acid, 100 mg L−1 myo-inositol, and 3.76 mg L−1 riboflavin. Root regeneration was achieved on MS medium containing 7.9 mg L−1 phloroglucinol and supported with vermiculite after 4 days of cultivation on ½ MS medium with 2 mg L−1 indole-3-butyric acid. After the rooting phase, in vitro plantlets were acclimatized in peat moss soil.

1. Introduction

Carica papaya (Caricaceae, Papaya), especially the “Eksotika” cultivar, is a significant crop in Malaysia [1]. C. papaya is considered as an economically important fruit tree, especially for tropical and subtropical populations. The C. papaya fruit can either be consumed as a fresh fruit or used as a treated product. The unripe fruits contain latex, which is the source of papain, a plant proteolytic enzyme [2]. The papain enzyme is able to break down protein and polypeptide. Therefore, it plays a crucial role in drug purposes and pharmaceutical industry. It is also used for clearing beer, tenderizing meat, leather industry, cosmetics industry, and candy and chewing gum industry [3,4].
Improvement of C. papaya could be achieved by increasing yield and improving the qualitative characteristics of the fruit [5]. Mostly, the C. papaya plant is propagated by seeds, but this method of propagation forms dissimilarity between the seedlings and the mother plant and limits seed-based propagation of C. papaya in commercial quantities [6,7]. Therefore, clonal multiplication by utilizing somatic embryogenesis was adopted to overcome this problem [8]. Somatic embryogenesis is a process of generating embryogenic cells from somatic cells after exposure to induction conditions [9]. Somatic embryogenesis can be used to increase plant production through the propagation of elite cultivars that produce fruits with high economic value [10]. There are many reports on somatic embryogenesis of C. papaya using immature zygotic embryos (IZE) [10,11,12,13,14]. However, all methods described in those reports were unsuitable for propagation of plantlets on an economic scale because of high incidence of abnormalities among the regenerated embryos and callus formation at the radical end of somatic embryos (SEs), which prevents conversion of SEs to plantlets [14].
Different C. papaya cultivars respond differently to in vitro cultures. The C. papaya “Taiping” produces five to six times more shoots in cultures compared to the C. papaya “Eksotika”, even when the medium is controlled for. Also, the continuous usage of papaya cultures to generate shoots in liquid media produced abnormal shoots. The C. papaya “Eksotika” was more susceptible to abnormality than the C. papaya “Taiping” [15]. Callus induction for somatic embryogenesis is affected by C. papaya cultivars. For instance, the C. papaya “Solo” produced more calluses than the explants from the C. papaya “Sunrise” in the same type of media [16]. The different cultivars of C. papaya responded differently during embryogenesis that took place in the same concentrations of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) [11].
Phloroglucinol (PG) is not familiar to many researchers in plant biotechnology labs and is mostly used as a complement in combination with other plant growth regulators, as its actual effect is hidden by commonly used plant growth regulators [17]. Phloroglucinol (1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene) has growth-promoting properties. PG gave a positive effect and enhanced the germination of Feijoa sellowiana that was regenerated through somatic embryogenesis when used in induction media [18]. Many researchers reported the significant effect of PG in stimulating shoot development when added to culture media [19,20], enhancing root induction in Bacopa monnieri [21], enhancing root induction in Rosa damascena [22], enhancing rooting frequency in Asparagus racemosus [23], enhancing micro-shoot rooting and plant survival of walnut trees during acclimatization [24], and enhancing bud induction responses and formation in Capsicum annuum on the inverted hypocotyls [25]. The presence of PG in culture medium of nodal segments from Stevia rebaudiana reduced the time needed for rooting and acclimatization. It also improved the photosynthetic activity in new leaves grown ex vitro and the survival rate of plants [26].
This research aimed to create a suitable and highly efficient protocol for regeneration of SEs in C. papaya from IZE. For that, different media with different plant growth regulator concentrations were examined to standardize the different developmental stages during somatic embryogenesis steps, starting from the induction stage all the way to the acclimatization stage (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Induction Phase

After 3 weeks of culturing, most IZE produced calluses on media containing 2,4-D but not in the control medium (i.e., medium without 2,4-D). After 6 weeks of culturing, the majority of the Petri dishes showed friable yellow calluses with SEs formation. The average callus weight and percentage of somatic embryogenesis were affected significantly (p < 0.05) with media composition (Table 1), whereas the average callus weight and percentage of somatic embryogenesis were affected non-significantly (p < 0.05) with the 2,4-D concentration and the interaction between media and 2,4-D concentration (Table 1). The highest average callus weight and somatic embryogenesis percentage were recorded in IM3 treatment [half strength Murashige and Skoog (½ MS) supplemented with 7.5 mg L−1 2,4-D] (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The highest somatic embryogenesis percentages in half strength McCown Woody Plant (½ WPM) were recorded in IM8 treatment (½ WPM supplemented with 10 mg L−1 2,4-D) (Figure 3).
Somatic embryogenesis is one of the pathways for in vitro plant regeneration. The relationship between culture medium composition and explant type leads to somatic embryo formation, but this relationship is complex and remains poorly understood. Most researchers use the classical approach of manipulating the ratios of plant growth regulators to optimize the quality and the number of embryos. In spite of this, several species and varieties do not respond to this classical approach and need additional optimization through the manipulation of other chemicals or physical factors [27]. A complete understanding of the factors that regulate induction, maturation, and germination of SEs will increase the efficiency of protocols for C. papaya propagation. Callus induction in C. papaya is frequently accomplished by adding 2,4-D to MS or ½ MS medium [11,28,29,30]. In general, small consideration has been offered to the constituents of media used for C. papaya propagation by somatic embryogenesis.
In our study, two different types of media were tested in combination with several concentrations of 2,4-D to induce embryogenic callus formation. The types of media differed in their nitrogen level, total ionic strength, ammonium-to-nitrate ratio, and ammonium concentration. It may be inferred that one of these nutritional parameters could be responsible for the differences in embryogenic response.
The best 2,4-D concentration for induction of somatic embryogenesis in ½ MS medium was 7.5 mg L−1, but the differences among treatment levels were not statistically significant. Our results differed from those of Fitch and Manshardt [11], who found that ½ MS medium augmented with 5 mg L−1 2,4-D gave the best result for induction somatic embryogenesis. If this difference is real, it may be due to the differences in C. papaya cultivars.

2.2. Maturation Phase

The potential for somatic embryo development in response to the various maturation treatments was analyzed through the mean number of SEs in each stage (Figure 4). The embryogenic callus induced in IM1 medium (½ MS supplemented with 2.5 mg L−1 2,4-D) was used to examine the effect of polyethylene glycol 8000 (PEG) on the maturation of SEs. The number of large SEs (larger than 3 mm) and the early torpedo shape were affected significantly (p < 0.05) with the PEG concentration (Table 2 and Figure 5).
Numerous studies demonstrated positive effects of PEG on somatic embryo maturation [31,32] and germination [31,33]. The quality of SEs can be improved by using PEG to decrease the osmotic potential in the maturation medium [34]. PEG cannot infiltrate into the plant cells, thus it limits water absorbance by creating water stress under in vitro conditions and simulates drought stress during SEs development [33,35]. Water stress changes the DNA methylation pattern and causes changes in expression of genes encoding proteins crucial for somatic embryo development [36]. Other researchers found that the PEG concentration in media had a positive correlation with the level of endogenous free proline [37]. The results of the present study are similar to those of Langhansova et al. (2004), who showed that PEG enhanced root meristem organization of torpedo-stage embryos during somatic embryogenesis in Panax ginseng. M5 treatment was chosen for further experiments because it increased the number of cotyledonary embryos during the maturation phase.
The embryogenic callus induced in IM3 medium (½ MS supplemented with 7.5 mg L−1 2,4D) was used to examine the effect of PG on the maturation of SEs. The number of cotyledon shape embryos was affected significantly (p < 0.05) with PG concentration (Table 3 and Figure 6). PG enhanced the germination of Feijoa sellowiana regenerated through somatic embryogenesis when used in the induction media [18]. PG was necessary during maturation and plant development during somatic embryogenesis of petal explants from Rosa hybrida L. “Arizona” [38]. It also played a critical role in controlling hyperhydricity throughout the lignification process in Acca sellowiana [39]. Until now, there has not been any published research on the effect of PG on the maturation phase of SEs of Carica papaya “Eksotika”.
M8 treatment was chosen for further experiments because it increased the number of cotyledonary embryos during the maturation phase. The positive results of PG in maturation medium of the present study are similar to those of Murali et al. [38], who showed that PG enhanced the germination of SEs in Rosa hybrida L. “Arizona”. The positive effect might be explained by a decrease in the amount of phenolic compounds in explants cultured in media augmented with PG [18]. Other researchers have stated that the addition of PG to in vitro culture medium acts as a synergist with auxin and stimulates shoot development [20]. The presence of PG in the culture media enhanced the production of various metabolites and enzymes (e.g., catalase and peroxidase, which are the oxidative enzymes) in Aristolochia tagala callus that originated from leaves. PG also increased the production of protein and carbohydrate (metabolites). In addition, it decreased the amount of polyphenol oxidase [40].

2.3. Germination Phase

To study the effect of activated charcoal (AC) during the germination phase, SEs grown in M5 and M8 were used as source of explant. The germination percentage of SEs was not affected with AC and source of explant (Table 4 and Figure 7).
Many researchers have demonstrated positive effects of AC in plant tissue cultures, especially in supporting growth and development of plant tissues [41,42]. AC helps in the induction [43] and the maturation [44] of SEs. The addition of AC to culture media may either encourage or restrain growth, depending on the species and the tissues used [45]. The present study demonstrated nonsignificant effects of AC during somatic embryo germination of C. papaya, regardless of the source of SEs, which came from M5 or M8.

2.4. Elongation Phase

The percentage of somatic embryo survival was recorded 6 weeks after culture in Elongation media (EL) medium (Table 5). A single medium was used for elongation of SEs. The source of SEs (which came from germination medium supported with AC or not) did not significantly affect (p < 0.05) the survival percentage after the elongation phase (Figure 8 and Figure 9).

2.5. Rooting Phase

Root induction and development is a critical parameter for in vitro plant regeneration in economic scales. The major problem faced in developing transgenic C. papaya plants is low rooting efficiency of regenerated shoots [13]. Many factors influence the development of roots in in vitro cultures, such as auxin type and concentration, shoot quality, donor age, and temperature [46]. The interaction of phytohormone during root development and growth is not fully understood [47]. Auxin plays a large role in regulating roots during growth and development [47,48]. It also regulates plant responses to the environment such as phototropism, gravitropism, and thigmotropism [49]. Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) was reported by many researchers as the best auxin for root induction in C. papaya [50,51,52]. IBA is better than other plant growth regulators, such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), or p-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid (pCPA) for root initiation of C. papaya. IBA has a greater ability to promote rooting with less callus formation compared with other types of auxin [52]. In the present study, we tested different additives (PG and riboflavin) that may promote rooting. PG enhanced root induction in Jatropha curcas L. in the presence of IBA [53], Prunus avium [54], and apple cultivars [55].
Four types of media were used in rooting experiments to study the effects of riboflavin and PG on root formation. The survival percentage of SEs was affected significantly (p < 0.05) with the presence of riboflavin. The largest survival percentage was recorded in R2 media. The survival rate of SEs was affected significantly (p < 0.05) with presence of PG (Table 6 and Figure 10).
Riboflavin is produced by plants and used as a catalyst in diverse metabolic pathways. The role of riboflavin in improving root induction and development has been registered in many studies [52,56,57]. Adventitious root systems for papaya (Carica papaya L.) were enhanced by exposure of shoots to a medium containing IBA for 2 days before transfer to a hormone-free medium containing riboflavin to enhance shoot and root formation by increasing the shoot length and decreasing callus formation at the base end of the stem [52]. Root formation on apple (Malus) shoots cultured in vitro was increased after an incubation in the dark medium supplemented with IBA and riboflavin. Removing riboflavin significantly affected the number of roots formed [56]
In the present study, the survival percentage of explant affected significantly (p < 0.05) with the presence of riboflavin, where added riboflavin to root media increased the survival percentage of explant. Our result agrees with those of Drew, et al. [58], who found that riboflavin promoted root initiation.
In the present study, the length of roots was affected significantly (p < 0.05) with the presence of PG. Our results are similar to those of many previous studies demonstrating a positive role of PG for the enhancement of root frequency [23] and root induction [21,59] in different plant species.

2.6. Acclimatization

The SEs rooted in different rooting media were transferred to peat moss soil for acclimatization, and the survival percentages were recorded after 1 month. The percentage of survival after acclimatization phase root media was affected significantly (p < 0.05) with root media (Table 7 and Figure 11).
Peat moss soil was used for acclimatization. The highest survival percentage was observed with germinated explant grown in R4 medium and transferred to peat moss soil. Our results are similar to those of many previous studies demonstrating a positive role of PG for the enhancement of rooting and plant survival of walnut trees during acclimatization [24].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Fruit Collection and Sterilization

Fruits of C. papaya cv. “Eksotika” were collected from organic farms near Desaru Bandar Penawar, Johor Bahru, which is 391 km southwest of Kuala Lumpur. The fruits were 95–100 days old when harvested. The fruits were sprayed with 70% ethanol and saved in an insulated icebox (4–6 °C) for 8 h until they were brought to the laboratory. The fruits were sprayed again with 70% ethanol, then washed with soap under running faucet water for approximately 15 min. The “Eksotika” fruits were sprayed three times with 70% ethanol in a “horizontal laminar flow hood” and cut open using a sterile sharp knife. The white creamy seeds were detached using a sterile spoon, and IZE was isolated from white creamy seeds by using forceps and a sterile dissecting blade.

3.1.1. Culture Conditions

All media in this paper were adjusted to pH 5.8 before adding gelrite or agar and were sterilized by autoclaving at 104 kPa (121 °C) for 20 min. All cultures in the induction and the maturation phases were maintained at 27 ± 1 °C in a culture room under dark conditions. For germination, elongation, and rooting stages, the cultures were maintained in a culture room at 27 ± 1 °C under a 16/8 h light/dark condition with 45 ± 5 μmol m−2 sec−1 light intensity from cool-white fluorescent tubes (Phillips, 32W 48in T8). All chemicals used in this paper were bought from Sigma-Aldrich except gelrite, sucrose, Murashige and Skoog (MS) media [60], and McCown Woody Plant (WPM) media [61], which were bought from Duchefa.

3.1.2. Induction Phase

In the induction phase, eight treatments were used for induction of the embryogenic callus. Each treatment consisted of one type of medium with one concentration of 2,4-D (Table 8).
Induction of embryonic callus was performed in Petri dishes (90 mm × 25mm) including 20 mL of medium. Ten Petri dishes were used for each treatment with nine IZE in each plate. Subculturing was done biweekly for 6 weeks. Average callus fresh weight and somatic embryogenesis percentage were recorded biweekly as follows:
A v e r a g e   c a l l u s   f r e s h   w e i g h t = W e i g h t   o f   a l l   e m b r y o g e n c   c a l l u s   i n   o n e   p l a t e T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   I Z E
where the weight of the induced callus was measured by using balance under a laminar flow hood condition.
S o m a t i c   e m b r y o g e n e s i s   % = N u m b e r   o f   I Z E   s h o w e s   s o m a t i c   e m b r y o s   T o t a l n u m b e r   o f   I Z E   x 100 %

3.2. Maturation Phase

The embryogenic calli that showed the best percentage of somatic embryogenesis induction in different induction media (IM1 and IM3) were used to examine nine maturation treatments with different concentrations of PEG or PG (Table 9).
The 2,4-D concentration in each maturation treatment was initially half of that in the corresponding induction treatment (i.e., for the first subculture, M1–M5 contained 1.25 mg L−1, and M6–M9 contained 3.75 mg L−1). These 2,4-D amounts were halved again for the second subculture (i.e., M1–M5: 0.63 mg L−1 and M6-M9: 1.88 mg L−1), and the third subculture was done without 2,4-D. Five Petri dishes (90 mm × 25 mm) were used for each treatment, and 0.4 g of embryogenic callus was transferred to each Petri dish. Subculturing was done biweekly for 8 weeks. The size of SEs (3 mm > small, 3 mm ≤ large) and the numbers of SEs at various developmental stages (globular, heart, cup-shape, torpedo, and cotyledon shape) were recorded after 8 weeks.

3.3. Germination Phase

The SEs that showed the best growth in different maturation treatment, M5 and M8, were used to test germination treatments. Four germination treatments with or without AC were used to examine the germination phase (Table 10). Five glass jars (30 mL medium in each) were used for each treatment. Each jar included 25 cotyledonary-stage embryos (length >3 mm). After 6 weeks of culturing, the survival rate (expressed as a percentage) was evaluated as follows:
S u r v i v a l   r a t e = N u m b e r   o f   s u r v i v a l   s o m a t i c   e m b r y o s   a f t e r   g e r m i n a t i o n   p h a s e T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   s o m a t i c   e m b r y o s   ( 25 )   x 100 %

Elongation Phase

Explants from all germination treatments were used to examine the elongation treatments (Table 11). Five glass jars (50 mL of medium in each) with five SEs were utilized for each treatment. After 6 weeks of culturing, the survival rate (expressed as a percentage) was evaluated.
S u r v i v a l   r a t e = N u m b e r   o f   s u r v i v a l   s o m a t i c   e m b r y o s   a f t e r   e l o n g a t i o n   p h a s e T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   s o m a t i c   e m b r y o s   ( 5 )   x 100 %

3.4. Rooting Phase

For the rooting phase, the explants grown in EL2 and EL4 treatments were used (Table 12) to study the effect of riboflavin and PG on rooting. After 6 weeks of culturing, the length and the number of roots formed as well as the callus formation on the roots were recorded.

3.5. Acclimatization

After the rooting phase, in vitro plantlets from all root treatments were transferred to plastic pots (8 × 6 cm) filled with peat moss soil. The vermiculite and the agar medium were gently rinsed off the roots by using autoclaved distilled water before planting. After that, the potted plantlets covered with a transparent plastic bag were kept in a culture room under the same conditions described in the germination phase for 3 weeks and were watered every 3 days.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

In this research, the whole experiments were set up in a “completely randomized design”. All quantitative data mentioned as percentages were firstly examined for normal distribution. All the variables in different phases of somatic embryogenesis were evaluated with one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The differences between means were scored with the “Duncan multiple range test” using “IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software”.

4. Conclusions

An efficient protocol for regeneration of Carica papaya L. cv. “Eksotika” SEs from IZE was developed. The percentage of somatic embryogenesis was affected significantly (p < 0.05) with media composition, whereas the percentage of somatic embryogenesis was affected non-significantly (p < 0.05) with the 2,4-D concentrations and the interaction between media and 2,4-D concentrations. During the maturation phase, the number of large SEs (larger than 3 mm) and the early torpedo shape were affected significantly (p < 0.05) with the PEG concentrations, while the number of cotyledon shape embryos was affected significantly with the PG concentrations. The germination percentage of SEs during the germination phase was affected non-significantly (p < 0.05) with the presence AC and the source of explant. The survival percentage of explants during the rooting phase was affected significantly (p < 0.05) with the presence of riboflavin. For acclimatization, the percentage of survival after the acclimatization phase was affected significantly (p < 0.05) with the root media.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.A.-S., R.M.T. and J.M.; Data curation, B.A.-S.; Formal analysis, A.K.; Funding acquisition, B.A.-S., R.M.T. and J.M.; Investigation, B.A.-S.; Methodology, B.A.-S., R.M.T. and H.E.; Supervision, R.M.T. and J.M.; Writing—original draft, B.A.-S., H.E. and A.K.; Writing—review & editing, B.A.-S. and H.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Institut Pengurusan dan Penyelidikan Perundingan: PG204-2014B, which was awarded to Prof Rosna Mat Taha, Jamaludin Mohamad and Baker Al-Shara.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the University of Malaya for all the facilities provided.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Madani, B.; Mirshekari, A.; Sofo, A.; Tengku Muda Mohamed, M. Preharvest calcium applications improve postharvest quality of papaya fruits (Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika II). J. Plant Nutr. 2016, 39, 1483–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mendoza, E.M.T.; Laurena, A.C.; Botella, J.R. Recent advances in the development of transgenic papaya technology. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 2008, 14, 423–462. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nakasone, H.Y.; Paull, R.E. Tropical Fruits; Cab International: Wallingford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mamboya, E.A.F. Papain, a plant enzyme of biological importance: A review. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 8, 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dhekney, S.; Kandel, R.; Bergey, D.; Sitther, V.; Soorianathasundaram, K.; Litz, R. Advances in papaya biotechnology. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2016, 5, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Paull, R.E.; Irikura, B.; Wu, P.; Turano, H.; Chen, N.J.; Blas, A.; Fellman, J.K.; Gschwend, A.R.; Wai, C.M.; Yu, Q. Fruit development, ripening and quality related genes in the papaya genome. Trop. Plant Biol. 2008, 1, 246–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kavitha, P.S.; Chezhiyan, N.; Kumar, N. Regeneration of Papaya Embryos under In Vitro Condition. In Ii International Symposium on Papaya; Kumar, N., Soorianathasundaram, K., Jeyakumar, P., Eds.; Int Soc Horticultural Science: Leuven, Belgium, 2010; Volume 851. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schmildt, O.; Campostrini, E.; Schmildt, E.R.; Netto, A.T.; Peçanha, A.L.; Ferraz, T.M.; Ferreguetti, G.A.; Alexandre, R.S.; González, J.C. Effects of indol butyric acid concentration on propagation from cuttings of papaya cultivars ‘Golden’and ‘Uenf/Caliman 01’. Fruits 2016, 71, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Quiroz-Figueroa, F.R.; Rojas-Herrera, R.; Galaz-Avalos, R.M.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M. Embryo production through somatic embryogenesis can be used to study cell differentiation in plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2006, 86, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Heringer, A.S.; Vale, E.M.; Barroso, T.; Santa-Catarina, C.; Silveira, V. Polyethylene glycol effects on somatic embryogenesis of papaya hybrid UENF/CALIMAN 01 seeds. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2013, 25, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Fitch, M.M.; Manshardt, R.M. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature zygotic embryos of papaya (Carica papaya L.). Plant Cell Rep. 1990, 9, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Clarindo, W.R.; de Carvalho, C.R.; Araujo, F.S.; de Abreu, I.S.; Otoni, W.C. Recovering polyploid papaya in vitro regenerants as screened by flow cytometry. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2008, 92, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Malabadi, R.B.; Kumar, S.V.; Mulgund, G.S.; Nataraja, K. Induction of somatic embryogenesis in papaya (Carica papaya). Res. Biotechnol. 2011, 2, 40–55. [Google Scholar]
  14. Razak, R.A.; Sekeli, R.; Shaharuddin, N.A.; Abdullah, J.O. Using mannose as a positive selection of transformed Carica papaya L. var ‘Eksotika’. J. Teknol. 2015, 77, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chan, L.; Teo, C. In vitro production of multiple shoots in papaya as affected by plant tissue maturity and genotype. Mardi Res. J. 1993, 21, 105–111. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, M.; Wang, P.; Maeda, E. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Carica papaya L. tissue culture derived from root explants. Plant Cell Rep. 1987, 6, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. da Silva, J.A.T.; Dobránszki, J.; Ross, S. Phloroglucinol in plant tissue culture. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant 2013, 49, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reis, E.; Batista, M.; Canhoto, J. Effect and analysis of phenolic compounds during somatic embryogenesis induction in Feijoa sellowiana Berg. Protoplasma 2008, 232, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sarkar, D.; Naik, P.S. Phloroglucinol enhances growth and rate of axillary shoot proliferation in potato shoot tip cultures in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2000, 60, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Steephen, M.; Nagarajan, S.; Ganesh, D. Phloroglucinol and silver nitrate enhances axillary shoot proliferation in nodal explants of Vitex negundo L. â an aromatic medicinal plant. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 8, 82–89. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ceasar, S.A.; Maxwell, S.L.; Prasad, K.B.; Karthigan, M.; Ignacimuthu, S. Highly efficient shoot regeneration of Bacopa monnieri (L.) using a two-stage culture procedure and assessment of genetic integrity of micropropagated plants by RAPD. Acta Physiol. Plant 2010, 32, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Noodezh, H.M.; Moieni, A.; Baghizadeh, A. In vitro propagation of the Damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant 2012, 48, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bopana, N.; Saxena, S. In vitro propagation of a high value medicinal plant: Asparagus racemosus Willd. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant 2008, 44, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Licea-Moreno, R.J.; Contreras, A.; Morales, A.V.; Urban, I.; Daquinta, M.; Gomez, L. Improved walnut mass micropropagation through the combined use of phloroglucinol and FeEDDHA. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2015, 123, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kumar, V.; Gururaj, H.; Prasad, B.N.; Giridhar, P.; Ravishankar, G. Direct shoot organogenesis on shoot apex from seedling explants of Capsicum annuum L. Sci. Hortic. 2005, 106, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Piqueras, A. Metatopolin and phloroglucinol improve shoot production and plant quality in micropropagated Stevia rebaudiana by the activation of ligngin metabolism. In IN VITRO CELLULAR and DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-ANIMAL; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; p. S65. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ramage, C.M.; Williams, R.R. Mineral nutrition and plant morphogenesis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant 2002, 38, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, M.; Chen, C.; Wang, D.; Chen, F. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature embryos of Carica papaya × Carica cauliflora cultured in vitro. Can. J. Bot. 1991, 69, 1913–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bhattacharya, J.; Khuspe, S.; Renukdas, N.; Rawal, S. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature embryo explant of papaya (Carica papaya L. cv. washington and honey dew); NISCAIR-CSIR: New Delhi, India, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ascencio-Cabral, A.; Gutierrez-Pulido, H.; Rodriguez-Garay, B.; Gutierrez-Mora, A. Plant regeneration of Carica papaya L. through somatic embryogenesis in response to light quality, gelling agent and phloridzin. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 118, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Walker, D.R.; Parrott, W.A. Effect of polyethylene glycol and sugar alcohols on soybean somatic embryo germination and conversion. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2001, 64, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yadollahi, A.; Abdollahi, M.; Moieni, A.; Danaee, M. Effects of carbon source, polyethylene glycol and abscisic acid on secondary embryo induction and maturation in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) microspore-derived embryos. Acta Physiol. Plant 2011, 33, 1905–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Langhansova, L.; Konradova, H.; Vaněk, T. Polyethylene glycol and abscisic acid improve maturation and regeneration of Panax ginseng somatic embryos. Plant Cell Rep. 2004, 22, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Körbes, A.P.; Droste, A. Carbon sources and polyethylene glycol on soybean somatic embryo conversion. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2005, 40, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wani, S.H.; Sofi, P.A.; Gosal, S.S.; Singh, N.B. In vitro screening of rice (Oryza sativa L) callus for drought tolerance. Commun. Biometry Crop. Sci. 2010, 5, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  36. Smulders, M.; De Klerk, G. Epigenetics in plant tissue culture. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 63, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Al-Khayri, J.; Al-Bahrany, A. Growth, water content, and proline accumulation in drought-stressed callus of date palm. Biol. Plant 2004, 48, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Murali, S.; Sreedhar, D.; Lokeswari, T. Regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from petal-derived calli of Rosa hybrida L. cv Arizona (hybrid tea). Euphytica 1996, 91, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ross, S.; Grasso, R. In vitro propagation of ‘Guayabo del país’ (Acca sellowiana (Berg.) Burret). Fruit Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 4, 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  40. Remya, M.; Bai, V.N.; Mutharaian, V. In vitro regeneration of Aristolochia tagala and production of artificial seeds. Biol. Plant 2013, 57, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Paek, K.-Y.; Hahn, E.-j. Cytokinins, auxins and activated charcoal affect organogenesis and anatomical characteristics of shoot-tip cultures of Lisianthus [Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn]. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant 2000, 36, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thomas, T.D. The role of activated charcoal in plant tissue culture. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26, 618–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Manchanda, P.; Gosal, S. Effect of activated charcoal, carbon sources and gelling agents on direct somatic embryogenesis and regeneration in sugarcane via leaf roll segments. Sugar Tech 2012, 14, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Krajňáková, J.; Häggman, H.; Gömöry, D. Effect of sucrose concentration, polyethylene glycol and activated charcoal on maturation and regeneration of Abies cephalonica somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2009, 96, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pan, M.; Van Staden, J. The use of charcoal in in vitro culture–A review. Plant Growth Regul. 1998, 26, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mohammed, G.H.; Vidaver, W.E. Root production and plantlet development in tissue-cultured conifers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 1988, 14, 137–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saini, S.; Sharma, I.; Kaur, N.; Pati, P.K. Auxin: A master regulator in plant root development. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 741–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Overvoorde, P.; Fukaki, H.; Beeckman, T. Auxin control of root development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a001537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Zažímalová, E.; Murphy, A.S.; Yang, H.; Hoyerová, K.; Hošek, P. Auxin transporters—Why so many? Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a001552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Sekeli, R.; Abdullah, J.O.; Namasivayam, P.; Muda, P.; Abu Bakar, U.K. Better rooting procedure to enhance survival rate of field grown Malaysian Eksotika papaya transformed with 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase gene. ISRN Biotechnol. 2012, 2013, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pérez, L.P.; Montesinos, Y.P.; Olmedo, J.G.; Rodriguez, R.B.; Sánchez, R.R.; Montenegro, O.N.; Escriba, R.C.R.; Daniels, D.; Gómez-Kosky, R. Effect of phloroglucinol on rooting and in vitro acclimatization of papaya (Carica papaya L. var. Maradol Roja). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant 2016, 52, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Drew, R.A.; McComb, J.A.; Considine, J.A. Rhizogenesis and root-growth of Carica-papaya L in vitro in relation to auxin sensitive phases and use of riboflavin. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 1993, 33, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Daud, N.; Faizal, A.; Geelen, D. Adventitious rooting of Jatropha curcas L. is stimulated by phloroglucinol and by red LED light. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant 2013, 49, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hammatt, N. Promotion by phloroglucinol of adventitious root formation in micropropagated shoots of adult wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Plant Growth Regul. 1994, 14, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dobránszki, J.; da Silva, J.A.T. Micropropagation of apple—A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 462–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. van der Krieken, W.M.; Breteler, H.; Visser, M.H.; Jordi, W. Effect of light and riboflavin on indolebutyric acid-induced root formation on apple in vitro. Physiol. Plant 1992, 85, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Priede, G.; Klavina, D. In vitro cultivation and root initiation of the endangered plant Pulsatilla patens. Environ. Exp. Biol. 2011, 9, 71–74. [Google Scholar]
  58. Drew, R.A.; Simpson, B.W.; Osborne, W.J. Degradation of exogenous indole-3-butyric acid and riboflavin and their influence on rooting response of papaya in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 1991, 26, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Petri, C.; Scorza, R. Factors affecting adventitious regeneration from in vitro leaf explants of ‘Improved French’plum, the most important dried plum cultivar in the USA. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2010, 156, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lloyd, G.; McCown, B. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Commer. Feasible Micropropag. Mt. Laurel Kalmia Latifolia Use Shoot Tip Cult. 1980, 30, 421–427. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. General phases in somatic embryogenesis process.
Figure 1. General phases in somatic embryogenesis process.
Plants 09 00360 g001
Figure 2. The means of average callus weight (g) on different media supplemented with different 2,4-D concentrations after 6 weeks of culture. MS: Murashige and Skoog; WPM: McCown Woody Plant.
Figure 2. The means of average callus weight (g) on different media supplemented with different 2,4-D concentrations after 6 weeks of culture. MS: Murashige and Skoog; WPM: McCown Woody Plant.
Plants 09 00360 g002
Figure 3. The means of the somatic embryogenesis percentage on different media supplemented with different 2,4-D concentrations after 6 weeks of subculture.
Figure 3. The means of the somatic embryogenesis percentage on different media supplemented with different 2,4-D concentrations after 6 weeks of subculture.
Plants 09 00360 g003
Figure 4. Different developmental stages of somatic embryos during maturation phase: (A) globular shape (G) of somatic embryo, (B) heart shape (H) and mature cotyledon stage (MCo) of somatic embryo, (C) torpedo stage (T), late torpedo stage (LT) and mature cotyledon stage (MCo) of somatic embryos, (D) cotyledon stage (Co) and mature cotyledon stage (MCo) of somatic embryos, (E) somatic embryos with root (R), (F) somatic embryos with callus (Ca) at the base end.
Figure 4. Different developmental stages of somatic embryos during maturation phase: (A) globular shape (G) of somatic embryo, (B) heart shape (H) and mature cotyledon stage (MCo) of somatic embryo, (C) torpedo stage (T), late torpedo stage (LT) and mature cotyledon stage (MCo) of somatic embryos, (D) cotyledon stage (Co) and mature cotyledon stage (MCo) of somatic embryos, (E) somatic embryos with root (R), (F) somatic embryos with callus (Ca) at the base end.
Plants 09 00360 g004
Figure 5. Embryogenic callus after 6 weeks on maturation media supplemented with different concentrations of polyethylene glycol 8000 (PEG) (0, 2, 4, 8, 12%) (M1–M5).
Figure 5. Embryogenic callus after 6 weeks on maturation media supplemented with different concentrations of polyethylene glycol 8000 (PEG) (0, 2, 4, 8, 12%) (M1–M5).
Plants 09 00360 g005
Figure 6. Embryogenic callus after 6 weeks on maturation media supplemented with different concentrations of phloroglucinol (PG) (0, 1, 5, 10 mg L−1) (M6–M9).
Figure 6. Embryogenic callus after 6 weeks on maturation media supplemented with different concentrations of phloroglucinol (PG) (0, 1, 5, 10 mg L−1) (M6–M9).
Plants 09 00360 g006
Figure 7. C. papaya “Eksotika” in germination media A1, explant germinated in G1 media. A2, explant germinated in G2 media. B1, explant germinated in G3 media. B2, explant germinated in G4 media.
Figure 7. C. papaya “Eksotika” in germination media A1, explant germinated in G1 media. A2, explant germinated in G2 media. B1, explant germinated in G3 media. B2, explant germinated in G4 media.
Plants 09 00360 g007
Figure 8. C. papaya “Eksotika” in elongation media A1 and A2, explant germinated in EL1 media. B1 and B2, explant germinated in EL2 media.
Figure 8. C. papaya “Eksotika” in elongation media A1 and A2, explant germinated in EL1 media. B1 and B2, explant germinated in EL2 media.
Plants 09 00360 g008
Figure 9. C. papaya “Eksotika” in elongation media A1 and A2, explant germinated in EL3 media. B1 and B2, explant germinated in EL4 media.
Figure 9. C. papaya “Eksotika” in elongation media A1 and A2, explant germinated in EL3 media. B1 and B2, explant germinated in EL4 media.
Plants 09 00360 g009
Figure 10. C. papaya “Eksotika” (A) explants rooted in R1 medium, (B) explants rooted in R2 medium, (C) explants rooted in R3 medium, (D) explants rooted in R4 medium.
Figure 10. C. papaya “Eksotika” (A) explants rooted in R1 medium, (B) explants rooted in R2 medium, (C) explants rooted in R3 medium, (D) explants rooted in R4 medium.
Plants 09 00360 g010
Figure 11. C. papaya “Eksotika” after one month: (A) explants regenerated from R1 medium, (B) explants regenerated from R2 medium, (C) explants regenerated from R3 medium, (D) explants regenerated from R4 medium.
Figure 11. C. papaya “Eksotika” after one month: (A) explants regenerated from R1 medium, (B) explants regenerated from R2 medium, (C) explants regenerated from R3 medium, (D) explants regenerated from R4 medium.
Plants 09 00360 g011
Table 1. Analysis of variance of the effect of media, 2,4-D concentrations and interaction between media and 2,4-D concentration on the average callus weight and percentage of somatic embryogenesis for induction of somatic embryogenesis in Eksotika.
Table 1. Analysis of variance of the effect of media, 2,4-D concentrations and interaction between media and 2,4-D concentration on the average callus weight and percentage of somatic embryogenesis for induction of somatic embryogenesis in Eksotika.
Average Callus WeightPercentage of Somatic Embryogenesis
Fp-ValueFp-Value
Media (M)20.7080.00011.5950.001
2,4-D Concentration (C)2.1860.1020.3850.765
M * C0.1080.9550.7740.514
Table 2. Comparison of embryo size classes, somatic embryo (SE) developmental stage, number of SEs with callus formation at the base, and number of SEs that formed roots in M1–M5 media after 8 weeks of subculture. All values are means ± SD.
Table 2. Comparison of embryo size classes, somatic embryo (SE) developmental stage, number of SEs with callus formation at the base, and number of SEs that formed roots in M1–M5 media after 8 weeks of subculture. All values are means ± SD.
MediaLarge EmbryosSmall EmbryosSomatic Embryo Developmental StageCallusRoot
GlobularHeartTorpedoEarly TorpedoCotyledonary
M120.80 ± 4.266c27.20 ± 4.63a15.20 ± 2.25a5.20 ± 3.56b18.20 ± 5.22a6.40 ± 4.28b6.20 ± 1.64c3.6 ± 3.78a6.40 ± 1.151b
M230.40 ± 1.871b19.60 ± 3.72a11.00 ± 4.03a5.00 ± 2.55b18.80 ± 3.77a6.20 ± 3.42b13.60 ± 7.23ab1.00 ± 0.71ab12.20 ± 2.77ab
M331.00 ± 5.339b17.80 ± 4.28a11.00 ± 3.84a7.00 ± 3.61ab13.60 ± 5.94a4.20 ± 2.59b16.40 ± 5.60a1.00 ± 1.23ab13.60 ± 2.89ab
M437.00 ± 7.810b26.00 ± 2.37a9.60 ± 1.28a8.80 ± 3.97ab17.60 ± 1.67a13.80 ± 7.36a17.60 ± 8.02a1.20 ± 1.10ab10.20 ± 1.88ab
M548.80 ± 5.111a21.80 ± 6.96a14.00 ± 2.60a10.00 ± 1.23a20.00 ± 7.94a16.40 ± 5.51a17.00 ± 8.00a0.00 ± 0.00b18.60 ± 5.26a
p-value0.000.3230.2610.0800.4150.0030.0690.0710.068
F-value12.6121.2481.4282.4391.0335.9122.5802.5542.591
Means followed by the same letter in same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to the Duncan multiple range test.
Table 3. Comparison of embryo size classes, somatic embryo developmental stage, number of SEs with callus formation at the base, and number of SEs that formed roots in M6-M9 medium after 8 weeks of subculture. All values are means ± SD.
Table 3. Comparison of embryo size classes, somatic embryo developmental stage, number of SEs with callus formation at the base, and number of SEs that formed roots in M6-M9 medium after 8 weeks of subculture. All values are means ± SD.
MediaLarge EmbryosSmall EmbryosSomatic Embryo Developmental StageCallusRoot
GlobularHeartTorpedoEarly TorpedoCotyledonary
M627.00 ± 5.24a25.20 ± 4.22a13.60 ± 1.48a10.00 ± 2.12a14.80 ± 2.28a10.60 ± 5.94a7.20 ± 1.79b6.20 ± 3.49a5.60 ± 2.07a
M730.00 ± 1.87a26.60 ± 3.09a10.80 ± 2.77a10.60 ± 2.88a19.80 ± 2.68a11.60 ± 1.14a8.00 ± 3.67b3.00 ± 1.23a9.60 ± 5.03a
M832.80 ± 7.50a41.20 ± 11.44a26.20 ± 9.91a10.20 ± 4.21a15.00 ± 8.75a9.20 ± 2.28a13.20 ± 4.38a3.80 ± 2.17a9.80 ± 3.42a
M931.80 ± 7.79a27.60 ± 5.51a15.80 ± 2.68a5.60 ± 2.41b16.60 ± 5.86a11.20 ± 4.50a10.00 ± 2.35ab4.20 ± 4.15a12.20 ± 7.33a
p-value0.4740.2620.1610.0600.4780.9170.0420.4010.433
F-value0.8761.4611.9573.0340.8670.1673.4521.0410.965
Means followed by the same letter in same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to the Duncan multiple range test.
Table 4. Comparison of means germination percentage after 6 weeks of germination. All values are means ± SD.
Table 4. Comparison of means germination percentage after 6 weeks of germination. All values are means ± SD.
MediaMean ± SDF Valuep-Value
G153.60 ± 4.603.8810.084
G242.40 ± 4.38
G356.80 ± 5.902.1130.184
G446.40 ± 5.40
p-value0.144
F-value2.07
Table 5. Comparison of means survival percentage after 6 weeks in elongation media. All values are means ± SD.
Table 5. Comparison of means survival percentage after 6 weeks in elongation media. All values are means ± SD.
MediaMean ± SDF Valuep-Value
EL143.37 ± 6.13a2.1340.182
EL255.95 ± 7.43a
EL344.09 ± 3.48a3.4050.102
EL457.80 ± 7.04a
p-value0.188
F-value1.80
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p<0.05 according to the Duncan multiple range test.
Table 6. Comparison of survival (%), root number, root length (cm), shoot length (cm), leaf number, and callus formation (%) at the base of SEs after 6 weeks of culture in different rooting media. All values are means ± SD.
Table 6. Comparison of survival (%), root number, root length (cm), shoot length (cm), leaf number, and callus formation (%) at the base of SEs after 6 weeks of culture in different rooting media. All values are means ± SD.
SEs SourceMedium TypeSurvival (%)Root NumberRoot LengthShoot lengthLeaf NumberCallus Formation
EL2R152.75 ± 5.75b2.25 ± 0.98a6.25 ± 2.63ab7.00 ± 2.45a4.25 ± 0.50a0.00 ± 0.00a
EL2R293.75 ± 4.16a2.50 ± 1.29a3.50 ± 1.73b4.75 ± 1.26a3.00 ± 1.41a14.50 ± 4.26a
EL4R383.5 ± 4.76a3.00 ± 1.16a10.25 ± 3.86a8.00 ± 2.16a4.50 ± 1.29a29.00 ± 3.41a
EL4R488.75 ± 4.00a3.75 ± 0.50a4.50 ± 1.29b7.00 ± 0.82a4.00 ± 0.82a0.00 ± 0.00a
Riboflavin
F-value 14.8160.0973.0502.6702.7782.890
p-value 0.0080.7660.1310.1530.1470.140
PG
F- value 0.1781.4217.9750.7500.4292.890
p-value 0.6880.2780.0300.4200.5370.140
Riboflavin X PG
F-value 6.2871.843.1940.8850.6521.606
p-value 0.0040.1740.0440.4970.6350.224
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to the Duncan multiple range test.
Table 7. Comparison of the average acclimatization (% ± SD) of germinated SEs after 6 weeks of growth in peat moss soil.
Table 7. Comparison of the average acclimatization (% ± SD) of germinated SEs after 6 weeks of growth in peat moss soil.
Explant SourceAcclimatization (%)F-Valuep-Value
R1 medium55.11 ± 4.81c0.1600.710
R2 medium66.67 ± 6.29bc
R3 medium83.33 ± 4.81ab1.000.374
R4 medium100.0 ± 00.00a
F value407.833
p-value0.000
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to the Duncan multiple range test.
Table 8. The treatments composition during the induction phase.
Table 8. The treatments composition during the induction phase.
Code of Treatment MediaComposition Solid Media Treatment (Per Litter Media)
Media2,4-D (mg L−1)
IM1½ MS2.5
IM2½ MS5
IM3½ MS7.5
IM4½ MS10
IM5½ WPM2.5
IM6½ WPM5
IM7½ WPM7.5
IM8½ WPM10
All treatments were supplemented with 100 mg L−1 L-glutamine, 50 mg L−1 myo-inositol, 45 mg L−1 adenine sulphate, 0.33% gelrite, and 6% sucrose.
Table 9. The treatments composition during the maturation phase.
Table 9. The treatments composition during the maturation phase.
Source of SEsCode of Treatment MediaComposition Solid Media Treatment (Per Litter Media)
MediaPEG (%)PG (mg L−1)
IM1M 1½ MS00
IM1M 2½ MS20
IM1M 3½ MS40
IM1M 4½ MS80
IM1M 5½ MS120
IM 3M 6½ MS00
IM 3M 7½ MS01
IM 3M 8½ MS05
IM 3M 9½ MS010
All treatments were supplemented with 100 mg L−1 L-glutamine, 100 mg L−1 myo-inositol, 68 mg L−1 adenine sulphate, 0.38% gelrite, and 3% sucrose.
Table 10. The treatments composition during the germination phase.
Table 10. The treatments composition during the germination phase.
Source of SEsCode of Treatment MediaComposition Solid Media Treatment (Per Litter Media)
MediaAC (0.05%)
M5G 1½ MS
M5G 2½ MS0
M8G 3½ MS
M8G 4½ MS0
All germination media supplemented with 3% sucrose and 0.8% agar. √: presence of activated charcoal; 0: absence of activated charcoal (AC).
Table 11. The treatments composition during elongation phase.
Table 11. The treatments composition during elongation phase.
Source of SEsCode of Treatment MediaMedia
G1EL 1½ MS
G2EL 2½ MS
G3EL 3½ MS
G4EL 4½ MS
All treatments were supplemented with 1 mg L−1 gibberellic acid (GA3), 0.5 mg L−1 indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 100 mg L−1 myo-inositol, and 3.76 mg L−1 riboflavin.
Table 12. The composition of treatment media during the rooting phase.
Table 12. The composition of treatment media during the rooting phase.
Source of SEsCode of Treatment MediaComposition Solid Media Treatment (Per Litter Media)
Riboflavin 3.76 mg L−1PG 7.9 mg L−1
EL2R 100
EL2R 20
EL4R 300
EL4R 40
R1–R4 treated for 4 days in MS medium augmented with 2 mg L−1 indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 3% sucrose, and 0.38% gelrite, then transferred to four types of media supported by vermiculite and 3% sucrose.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Shara, B.; Taha, R.M.; Mohamad, J.; Elias, H.; Khan, A. Somatic Embryogenesis and Plantlet Regeneration in the Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika. Plants 2020, 9, 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030360

AMA Style

Al-Shara B, Taha RM, Mohamad J, Elias H, Khan A. Somatic Embryogenesis and Plantlet Regeneration in the Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika. Plants. 2020; 9(3):360. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Shara, Baker, Rosna Mat Taha, Jamaludin Mohamad, Hashimah Elias, and Asif Khan. 2020. "Somatic Embryogenesis and Plantlet Regeneration in the Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika" Plants 9, no. 3: 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030360

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop