Next Article in Journal
Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Coloured Callus Formation and Accumulation of Azadirachtin, an Essential Biopesticide in Azadirachta indica
Next Article in Special Issue
Multidimensional Evaluation for Detecting Salt Tolerance of Bread Wheat Genotypes Under Actual Saline Field Growing Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Metabolites and Citrate-Degrading Enzymes Activities in Citrus Fruits Reveal the Role of Balance between ACL and Cyt-ACO in Metabolite Conversions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stomatal and Photosynthetic Traits Are Associated with Investigating Sodium Chloride Tolerance of Brassica napus L. Cultivars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

miRNA–mRNA Integrated Analysis Reveals Roles for miRNAs in a Typical Halophyte, Reaumuria soongorica, during Seed Germination under Salt Stress

1
Research Center of Saline and Alkali Land of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
2
Tianjin Research Institute of Forestry of Chinese Academy of Forestry, Tianjin 300450, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(3), 351; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030351
Submission received: 12 February 2020 / Revised: 3 March 2020 / Accepted: 6 March 2020 / Published: 10 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiological and Molecular Plant Responses to Salt Stress)

Abstract

:
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous small RNAs that play a crucial role in plant growth, development, and environmental stress responses. Reaumuria soongorica is a typical halophyte that is widely distributed in saline–alkali desert regions. Under salt stress, R. soongorica can complete germination, a critical biological process in the life cycle of seed plants. To identify miRNAs and predict target mRNAs involved in seed germination during salt stress, nine small-RNA libraries were constructed and analyzed from R. soongorica seeds treated with various concentrations of NaCl. We also obtained transcriptome data under the same treatment conditions. Further analysis identified 88 conserved miRNAs representing 25 defined families and discovered 13 novel miRNAs from nine libraries. A co-expression analysis was performed on the same samples to identify putative miRNA–mRNA interactions that were responsive to salt stress. A comparative analysis of expression during germination under 273 (threshold) and 43 mM (optimal) NaCl treatments identified 13 differentially expressed miRNAs and 23 corresponding target mRNAs, while a comparison between 43 mM NaCl and non-salt-stress conditions uncovered one differentially expressed miRNA and one corresponding target mRNA. These results provide basic data for further study of molecular mechanisms involved in the germination of salt-stressed R. soongorica seeds, and also provide a reference for the improvement of salt tolerance during plant germination.

1. Introduction

Seed germination is a key event in the life cycle of seed plants. During germination, a seed in a stationary (dry seed) state is transformed into a metabolically active embryo that breaks through the cyst structure (the endosperm and testa) and forms a young seedling [1,2]. These early germination events can be affected by a wide range of biological and abiotic factors [1,2,3,4].
Salt stress is a major abiotic stress that limits seed germination [5]. Reaumuria (Tamaricaceae) plants are typical perennial, salt-secreting, halophyte shrubs. This genus contains 12 species, which are widely distributed in saline–alkali desert regions worldwide, especially in Asia, North Africa, and southern Europe. Four species are currently found in China, namely R. soongorica, R. alternifolia, R. kaschgarica, and R. trigyna. Reaumuria soongorica is a representative species of saline–alkali desert ecosystems throughout Central Asia, especially in Taklamakan, Gurbantungut, Kumtag, Bataan Khiran, Qaidam, southern Russia, Inner Mongolia, and the Tengger Desert [6,7]. Because of accelerating global climate change and human activity, salinization is increasing in these regions [6,8]. Reaumuria soongorica has endured the desertification and salinization of Asia that began at least 22 million years ago, as evidenced by palaeomagnetic measurements and the fossil record [9].
Reaumuria soongorica is widely distributed in the northwestern region of China, where it is a representative dominant species of steppe saline–alkali desert areas. The species is mainly distributed along salt lake coasts and in saline–alkali depressions [10]. Reaumuria soongorica occupies an important position in the ecological and economic zone community types of the Inner Mongolia Plateau [11] and possesses abundant foliar levels of proteins, fats, and micronutrients [12]. The species plays a crucial role in the stabilization of shifting sand and is thus extremely useful for reducing the effects of desertification and overgrazing—the major environmental problems in the Inner Mongolian region over the past 50 years [13,14,15]. The most important grazing lands in Inner Mongolia are usually those growing large quantities of R. soongorica, which can also serve as a salt source for livestock [12,16,17]. Reaumuria soongorica can start and complete the seed germination process in a high-salt environment [18,19]. Several research teams have completed studies on the physiology and biochemistry of R. soongorica under abiotic stress conditions [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], but none have focused on the roles of miRNAs during germination of salt-stressed R. soongorica seeds. High-throughput sequencing of small RNAs based on transcriptome data is an efficient method for studying miRNAs and their regulatory networks.
MicroRNAs are an important class of non-coding regulatory small (20–24 nt) RNAs that mediate gene expression by degrading target mRNAs or repressing mRNA translation [26]. Recent attention has been focused on elucidation of mechanisms used by miRNAs to regulate gene expression. Various studies have determined that miRNAs are widely involved in plant biological and metabolic processes, such as growth, development, and response to stress [27,28,29], including salinity stress [30]. Although thousands of miRNAs from different plant species have currently been identified by high-throughput sequencing technology and registered in miRBase22.1 (http://www.mirbase.org/), information about R. soongorica miRNAs is entirely absent from this database.
The objective of our study was to catalog R. soongorica miRNAs and identify putative miRNAs (and their corresponding target genes) responsive to salt stress during germination of R. soongorica seeds. We used high-throughput sequencing technology to analyze nine small-RNA sequencing libraries obtained from R. soongorica seeds exposed to no salt stress (CS), an optimal salt concentration for germination (LS), and a threshold salt concentration for germination (MS). We identified miRNAs and predicted their mRNA targets based on comparisons with corresponding expression profiles of the R. soongorica transcriptome. We were thus able to further reveal the regulatory mechanism of miRNAs and mRNAs under salt stress. Our generated data provide new insights into the regulation of germination of salt-stressed R. soongorica seeds and should spur the improvement of non-halophyte seeds for germination under salt stress.

2. Results

2.1. Summary of the Small-RNA Library Dataset Obtained from Deep Sequencing of R. soongorica

To explore the regulatory mechanism of miRNAs in the germination of salt-stressed seeds, we collected and sequenced total RNA from R. soongorica seeds grown under different salt concentrations: CS, without salt stress; LS, an optimal salt concentration for germination; and MS, a threshold salt concentration for germination. Using Illumina sequencing technology, approximately 44.90, 40.79, and 44.82 million raw reads were obtained from triplicate samples of CS, LS, and MS treatments, respectively (Table 1). Over 90% of raw reads remained after removal of adaptor sequences, low-quality tags, and reads longer than 30 nt or shorter than 18 nt. In total, we acquired nearly 125.86 million clean reads, more than 90% of which were subsequently mapped to the R. soongorica reference sequence (Table 2).
Small-RNA sequences of 18 to 30 nt in length, the most abundant of which were 19–24 nt long, were selected for further study (Figure 1). These mapped small RNAs comprised known miRNAs, putative novel miRNAs, ribosomal RNA (rRNAs), transfer RNA (tRNAs), small nuclear RNA (snRNAs), small nucleolar RNA (snoRNAs), trans-acting small interfering RNAs (TAS), and unannotated fragments (Table 2). We found that 0.08%–1.14% of the mapped small RNAs were previously identified miRNAs, while 76.65%–85.02% were unannotated small RNAs. This high number of unannotated small RNAs suggests that additional miRNAs remain to be identified in R. soongorica. Prediction of novel miRNAs was based on unannotated small RNAs. The most abundant small-RNA sequence length was 21 nt (10.75%), followed by 20 nt (9.72%) and 19 nt (9.21%) (Figure 1). These lengths and relative populations are similar to typical small-RNA distributions in angiosperms.

2.2. Identification of Conserved miRNAs from Known Families

To identify conserved miRNAs in R. soongorica seeds, sequences of small RNAs were compared with known plant miRNA sequences in the miRBase database. Following a BLASTN search and further sequence analyses, we uncovered 88 miRNAs belonging to 25 previously identified miRNA families (Table S1). Approximately half of the families had more than one member. The largest family, MIR156, contained 13 members (Figure 2).
Obvious differences in abundance, as reflected by library read counts, were observed among these miRNA families (Table S1). To compare expression levels in this study, we calculated the average transcripts per million reads (TPM) of each miRNA in nine libraries [31,32,33]. After TPM standardization, rso-miR171a had the lowest expression level and a relatively low abundance (92.13 TPM), while the highest relative expression level was that of rso-miR159a (146,916.58 TPM), followed by rso-miR159c (76,138.88 TPM) and rso-miR159b (73,930.26 TPM).

2.3. Discovery of Novel miRNAs in R. soongorica Seeds

To identify novel miRNAs from the unannotated small-RNA tags, the miREvo and miRDeep2 programs were used to predict secondary structures and Dicer cleavage sites and to measure minimum free energies. In total, 13 putative novel miRNAs were predicted from the nine libraries (Table S2). All of these novel miRNAs were found in at least two independent libraries of a given treatment, and nine were found in all nine libraries. Novel mature miRNAs ranged in length from 18–24 nt, and approximately 60% were 21 nt long. Fewer novel miRNAs (13) were uncovered than conserved miRNAs (88). These putative novel miRNAs may represent new miRNA families or correspond to previously unknown members of known miRNA families.

2.4. Differential Expression of miRNAs during Germination of R. soongorica Seeds Exposed to Various Salt Treatments

To determine the relationship between miRNA expression and salt stress, R. soongorica seeds were treated with NaCl during germination. The normalized expressions of miRNA families in LS libraries were compared with those in CS and MS libraries using fold-change calculations. Any miRNA with an absolute fold change of greater than 1 as well as a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be differentially expressed under salt stress (Table S3) [34,35,36].
Compared with their expressions in CS, four miRNAs were down-regulated and five were up-regulated in LS (Figure 3A), while 12 miRNAs were down-regulated and seven were up-regulated in MS compared with LS (Figure 3B). In addition, two novel miRNAs each were differentially expressed in LS vs. CS and MS vs. LS comparisons. These differences indicate that the expressions of these miRNAs dynamically respond to changing NaCl concentrations. Details of the differentially expressed novel and conserved miRNAs are summarized in Table S3. Taking into account the expression patterns of these miRNAs, we speculate that they play a crucial role in the germination of R. soongorica seeds under salt-stress conditions. Among them, several non-classical miRNAs and novel miRNAs, including rso-miR5139a, rso-miR6173a, and novel-14, have not been previously implicated in non-halophyte seed germination under salt stress [37,38], thus indicating that unique regulatory mechanisms may be used by halophytes.

2.5. miRNA and mRNA Correlation Analysis

To further explain the role of miRNAs in salt-stress response and confirm potential mRNA targets identified by sequencing, we performed an extensive correlation analysis of the expressions of miRNAs and their target mRNAs. Two miRNA–target–mRNA groups of clusters were identified from two comparisons. One group, identified by comparison of LS and CS expressions, consisted of a cluster containing a single miRNA (Table S4). The other group, which highlighted variations between MS and LS conditions, included 13 miRNAs and 23 target mRNAs. The largest cluster in this group was rso-miR4995a, which included six regulated mRNAs (Figure 4; Table S4). Overall, the fold-change expression levels of mRNAs were correlated with those of their paired miRNAs in both groups of clusters. In addition, connections including genes involved in transcriptional regulation can lead to significant secondary effects on the transcription of other genes. Details of the results of the miRNA–mRNA correlation analysis are found in Table S4.

3. Discussion

miRNAs are an important class of non-coding regulatory small RNAs involved in gene regulation in most eukaryotic cells. Many studies have indicated that miRNAs are widely involved in a variety of stress responses, including responses to drought, cold, salinity, oxidative stress, and viruses [39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Consequently, tremendous efforts have been made to study miRNAs in various plant species. Traditional methods for discovering and identifying miRNAs, such as Sanger sequencing and bioinformatics prediction, are time-consuming and labor-intensive. In addition, this type of technology has difficulty detecting novel or low-abundance miRNAs. High-throughput sequencing technology, which is rapid and efficient, is ideal for the study of novel or low-abundance miRNAs and the analysis of small-RNA clusters at multiple stages of plant development under various natural environmental stress conditions [46,47].
Since the high-throughput sequencing’s first application in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana [48], it has played a huge role in the discovery of miRNAs in various plant species, including barley [31], rubber tree [33], peach [49], moso bamboo [50], peanut [51], Nicotiana benthamiana [52], and Ulmus pumila [53]. To date, 7474 hairpin sequences and 9168 mature miRNA sequences have been identified from 74 angiosperm species. Although these achievements have been incorporated into miRBase 22.1, sequence information for R. soongorica miRNAs is entirely absent from this database.
Seed germination begins with water absorption (swelling) that mobilizes stored materials, which in turn causes cells to elongate until the radicle breaks through the seed coat at the completion of germination. The mobilization of stored materials involves a series of metabolic reactions. In response to biotic and abiotic stress conditions, these reactions can be modulated by altering gene expression and by using different metabolic or signal transduction pathways. Reaumuria soongorica, a typical halophyte plant, may possess special regulatory mechanisms that enable its seeds to complete germination under salt conditions that prevent the germination of non-halophytes.
In the present study, we obtained a large number of small-RNA sequences from salt-stressed R. soongorica seeds. These sequences were analyzed using the miRBase database, enabling the identification of 88 conserved miRNAs belonging to 25 known families corresponding to the majority of miRNAs previously found in other plant species (Table 1). We detected 13, 11, 10, and 10 members of MIR156, MIR166, MIR167, and MIR396 families, respectively, in R. soongorica. In addition, we identified 13 novel miRNAs not previously detected in any known families.
In our earlier studies, we used transcriptome data to also identify genes differentially expressed in LS, CS, and MS conditions [18]. To better understand miRNA–mRNA regulatory relationships predicted by sequencing data, we compared our small-RNA expression data in the current study with those previously obtained for putative target mRNAs. An miRNA–mRNA correlation analysis was performed to visualize negatively and positively correlated interaction groups of clusters according to the method of Ma et al. (2011) [54].
The LS vs. CS comparison group consisted of one cluster, which included one differentially regulated miRNA (Table S4). The group comparing MS and LS samples included 13 miRNAs and 23 target mRNAs (Table S4). The auxin response factor gene was found to be a potential target of MIR396, an miRNA family involved in auxin signal transduction during many stages of plant growth development [45,55]. Compared with their expressions under LS conditions, rso-miR396a and rso-miR396b tended to be up-regulated in higher-salt MS conditions and were correlated with decreased expression of HB33 to inhibit seed germination. The gene encoding copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (the expected target of MIR398) plays an important role in plant response to abiotic stress [56]. The rso-miR398a was down-regulated by the increased salinity of the LS treatment compared with CS, but no significant difference was observed between MS and LS. This observation contrasts with the findings of studies on A. thaliana, Ulmus pumila, and Caragana intermedia, in which the expression of miR398 was reduced under salt stress [53,57,58]. This result suggests that a difference exists in halophyte and non-halophyte responses to low-concentration salt stress.
We also found that CYP707A2, a key gene encoding ABA 8′-hydroxylase in ABA (abscisic acid) catabolism [59], is the likely target of MIR4995. In Arabidopsis, CYP707A genes encode ABA 8′-hydroxylases and are involved in many physiological processes [60]. Previous experiments have demonstrated that ABA 8′-hydroxylase genes, such as CYP707A1 and CYP707A2 in Arabidopsis, play prominent roles in the regulation of endogenous ABA levels during seed dormancy and germination [59,60,61,62]. In contrast to results comparing LS with CS, rso-miR4995a exhibited a downward-regulated trend in MS relative to LS. MIR159 putatively targets mRNAs encoding GA (gibberellin)-MYB (v-myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog) transcription factors that interact with GA-response elements and participate in short-day floral initiation and anther development [63,64]. Interestingly, the expression of miR159 is repressed in the absence of GA, possibly through the action of DELLA proteins (named for a conserved pentapeptide motif) that are in turn targeted for GA-induced proteolysis [63]. The MIR159 family exhibited an upward-regulated trend in MS relative to LS, which contrasts with its down-regulation in LS compared with CS. These results may reflect a unique regulatory mechanism used by halophyte seeds during germination under salt stress. On the basis of our results and previous research, we hypothesize that R. soongorica quickly activates miRNA regulatory mechanisms under salt stress and further regulates GA, auxin, and ABA pathways, thereby regulating the germination ability of its seeds under salt stress (Figure 5). These results indicate that R. soongorica may inhibit seed germination by reducing auxin and gibberellin levels and increasing ABA concentrations under high salinity. This regulatory mechanism ensures that R. soongorica halts germination under high salt stress but can survive periods of high salinity (i.e., salt concentrations exceeding the level that R. soongorica can tolerate during the germination period) and germinate under low-salt conditions (i.e., within the salt-stress concentration range that R. soongorica can tolerate during the germination period) to improve survival.
Our study is the first to identify miRNAs and target genes specifically implicated in the germination of salt-stressed R. soongorica seeds. Our results provide an overview of potential pathways and mechanisms involved in this process. Nevertheless, more experiments are required to confirm the targets of differential miRNA expression and clarify the regulatory gene groups of clusters underlying subsequent regulation of germination of salt-stressed R. soongorica seeds.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Salt-Stress Treatment

Reaumuria soongorica seeds (1000-seed weight = 1.137 ± 0.121 g) were collected from saline desert areas of the semi-desert steppe of the western Inner Mongolian Plateau, China. Reaumuria soongorica is a diploid with a chromosome number of 22. Karyotypic analysis has determined that chromosome sizes range from 3.38 to 5.51 μm, and the chromosomal formula is 2n = 2x = 22 = 4m + 14sm + 4st. Fluorescent in situ hybridization detected four pairs of 45S rDNA signals at the ends of R. soongorica chromosomes. In addition, a flow cytometry analysis predicted a genome size of approximately 778 Mb [65]. The natural salt composition of the soil in the collection area is mainly chloride–sulfate, of which NaCl is an important component and the most harmful to plant growth. The total soil salt content is generally 0.3%–0.6%; during the spring seed-germination period, however, the rate of soil-surface salt accumulation is as high as 100%, and the total salt content can reach 0.6%–1.2% [66,67,68].
We carried out germination experiments on R. soongorica seeds in the presence of different NaCl concentrations, observed R. soongorica growth and physiological indicators during the germination period under salt stress, and calculated the salt tolerance threshold and optimal salt-stress concentration [18,19]. We obtained a salt tolerance threshold of 273 mM (corresponding to a salt content of 1.58%). This concentration of NaCl, the main type of salt in the habitat of R. soongorica, is slightly higher than the average maximum total salt concentration recorded in spring; because this concentration should therefore generate the optimal stress effect while simulating natural conditions, it was applied as a treatment in this study (denoted as MS). By observing the growth performance of seeds under salt stress, we also determined that the optimum NaCl treatment concentration was 43 mM; denoted as LS, this treatment can promote the germination and growth of R. soongorica seeds [18,19].
The R. soongorica seeds were placed on a double layer of filter paper in a culture dish and germinated under MS, LS, or distilled water (defined as CS) conditions at 25 °C and 55% humidity in the dark. The treatments were repeated three times. When a hypocotyl had broken through the seed coat but did yet not exceed 2 mm in length, it was harvested, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use in small-RNA library construction.

4.2. Small-RNA Library Construction and Sequencing

Samples were ground to a powder under liquid nitrogen, and aliquots of approximately 100 mg were placed in sterile 2 mL Eppendorf tubes. After addition of a suitable amount of Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), the contents of each tube were homogenized for three minutes using a vortex shaker, and total RNA was extracted according to the Trizol kit instructions. RNA integrity was checked by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and on a bioanalyzer (Agilent 2100, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with only those samples with an RNA integrity value of ≥7.5 used for subsequent analysis. Nine small-RNA libraries (CS-1, CS-2, CS-3, LS-1, LS-2, LS-3, MS-1, MS-2, and MS-3) were constructed from the purified RNA using an NEB Multiplex Small RNA Library Preparation kit (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA). Index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. Briefly, specific adapters were added to the 3′ and 5′ ends of miRNA, small interfering RNA, and piwi-interacting RNA, and first-strand cDNA was then synthesized using M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (RNase H-) as a catalyst. PCR amplification was performed with specific primers and LongAmp Taq 2x Master Mix (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on an 8% polyacrylamide gel at 100 V for 80 min. Recovered DNA fragments of the expected length (140–160 bp) were dissolved in 8 µL of elution buffer. Library quality was assessed on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system using high-sensitivity DNA chips. Clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBotCluster Generation System using a TruSeq SR Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumina) following the manufacturer’s instructions. After completing the above pretreatments, the purified library was sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform by Novogene (Beijing, China). The small-RNA sequencing data collected in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under accession number PRJNA578509.

4.3. Identification of Conserved and Novel miRNAs

After sequencing, clean reads were obtained from the raw data by removing adapter-contaminated or low-quality reads, poly-N-containing reads, and reads shorter than 18 nt. All remaining sequences were considered to be of high quality and were further analyzed. Because no R. soongorica genome has been published and nucleic acid sequences are lacking in known public databases, a transcriptome (poly[A]-enriched mRNA) of R. soongorica seeds germinated under the same salt treatment conditions was sequenced as a reference (SRA database: PRJNA510727) [21]. Because pre-miRNA sequences are very short and lack poly(A) tails, they cannot be captured by transcriptome sequencing; consequently, the miRNA sequences we obtained in this study were likely pri-miRNAs [69]. Using bioinformatics methods, pre-miRNA sequences can be identified on the basis of their characteristic hairpin structures [70,71]. Only those sequences that could be mapped to the transcriptome sequence using Bowtie (http://banana-geno-me.cirad.fr/content/download-dh-pahang) [72] were analyzed further. Sequences matching non-coding RNAs (rRNAs, scRNAs, snoRNAs, snRNAs, and tRNAs) in the Rfam 10.1 database were removed, and the remaining sequences were compared against known miRNAs in miRBase 22.1 (http://www.mirbase.org/). To predict novel miRNAs, unannotated sRNA sequences were analyzed for hairpin structures, Dicer cleavage sites, and minimum free energy with an integrated combination of miREvo [73] and mirdeep2 [71] software. The criteria used for identifying novel miRNAs were based on Meyers et al. (2008) [74]. Those miRNAs showing extremely low expression levels (≤2 reads in any two treatment repeats [34]) in the nine libraries were removed and not used in further analyses.

4.4. Relative Expression between miRNA Libraries

To analyze the differential accumulation of miRNAs in the nine libraries, miRNA expression levels, including those of conserved and novel individual miRNAs, were calculated as TPM (per million transcripts) [43]. The p-values for comparisons of expression profiles between different miRNA libraries were obtained using the DESeq2 R package [75,76,77]. The differentially expressed miRNAs were screened using the following thresholds: Absolute fold change greater than 1 as well as a p-value less than 0.05, generally the highest acceptable significant p-value; miRNAs matching these criteria were considered to be up-regulated or down-regulated, respectively, in response to salt stress [75,76,77].

4.5. Prediction of miRNA Target Genes

Sequence complementarity between miRNAs and potential target mRNAs was assessed using computational analysis [78]. Target prediction was carried out using the psRobot tool based on psRobot_tar [79] and through alignment with R. soongorica transcriptomes collected under the same experimental conditions (SRA database: PRJNA510727) [18]. The extracted sequences were further analyzed using the NCBI database to obtain possible protein-coding genes in R. soongorica.

4.6. miRNA and mRNA Correlation Analysis

To better understand predicted miRNA–mRNA regulatory relationships, we constructed groups of clusters containing miRNA–mRNA pairs negatively and positively correlated in the small-RNA and transcriptome expression datasets. First, we screened the miRNA data to obtain miRNAs that could match mRNA and identified mRNAs that included targeted miRNAs based on the R. soongorica transcriptome data. Finally, we performed a correlation analysis of the two databases obtained above to identify the miRNA–mRNA regulatory relationship [54,80].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we identified 88 conserved miRNAs representing 25 defined families and discovered 13 novel miRNAs from R. soongorica using small-RNA high-throughput sequencing technology. Co-expression analysis of putative miRNA–mRNA interactions using samples acquired at varying salt treatments allowed us to obtain two groups of clusters that connected one miRNA with one mRNA target in LS vs. CS and 13 miRNAs with 23 target mRNAs in MS vs. LS. Our results provide a foundation for further research on the molecular mechanisms of seed germination of R. soongorica during salt stress and can also serve as a basis for improving plant salt tolerance during germination.

Supplementary Materials

The following information is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/3/351/s1. Table S1: Conserved miRNAs identified in Reaumuria soongorica; Table S2: Novel miRNAs identified in R. soongorica; Table S3: All (known and novel) differentially expressed miRNAs in LS vs. CS and MS vs. LS; Table S4: The results of miRNA–mRNA comparative analyses of LS vs. CS and MS vs. LS.

Author Contributions

H.Z. (Huilong Zhang), J.Z., and H.Z. (Huaxin Zhang) conceived and designed the experiments and drafted the manuscript; H.Z. (Huilong Zhang) and X.L. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; X.Y. and H.W. aided in performing the experiments and analyzing the data; H.Z. (Huilong Zhang), X.L., J.Z., X.Y., and H.W. contributed materials/reagents/analysis tools. All authors have read and approved this version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 31600542), the Fundamental Research Funds of CAF (project no. CAFYBB2019MB008), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (project no. 2016YFC0501303).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Finch Savage, W.E.; Leubner Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 501–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bai, B.; Peviani, A.; van der Horst, S.; Gamm, M.; Snel, B.; Bentsink, L.; Hanson, J. Extensive translational regulation during seed germination revealed by polysomal profiling. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Weitbrecht, K.; Muller, K.; Leubner-Metzger, G. First off the mark: Early seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3289–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gu, D.; Chen, C.Y.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, L.; Duan, X.; Duan, J.; Wu, K.; Liu, X. Identification of HDA15-PIF1 as a key repression module directing the transcriptional network of seed germination in the dark. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 7137–7150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cristiano, G.; Camposeo, S.; Fracchiolla, M.; Vivaldi, G.; De Lucia, B.; Cazzato, E. Salinity Differentially Affects Growth and Ecophysiology of Two Mastic Tree (Pistacia lentiscus L.) Accessions. Forests 2016, 7, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yang, X.; Rost, K.T.; Lehmkuhl, F.; Zhu, Z.; Dodson, J. The evolution of dry lands in northern China and in the Republic of Mongolia since the Last Glacial Maximum. Quat. Int. 2004, 118–119, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, Z.D.; Wu, Z.; Liu, S.; Di, X. An Outline of Chinese Deserts; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1980; pp. 56–90. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang, X.P.; Scuderi, L.; Paillou, P.; Liu, Z.T.; Li, H.W.; Ren, X.Z. Quaternary environmental changes in the drylands of China-A critical review. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2011, 30, 3219–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guo, Z.T.; Ruddiman, W.F.; Hao, Q.Z.; Wu, H.B.; Qiao, Y.S.; Zhu, R.X.; Peng, S.Z.; Wei, J.J.; Yuan, B.Y.; Liu, T.S. Onset of Asian desertification by 22 Myr ago inferred from loess deposits in China. Nature 2002, 416, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Delectis Florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Agendae Academiae Sinicae Edita. In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1990; Volume 50, p. 143.
  11. Liu, Y.B.; Wang, G.; Liu, J.; Zhao, X.; Tan, H.J.; Li, X.R. Anatomical, morphological and metabolic acclimation in the resurrection plant Reaumuria soongorica during dehydration and rehydration. J. Arid Environ. 2007, 70, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, G.; Ren, Z. Discussion on feeding value of several main plants of Alashan desert region. Grassl. China 1990, 5, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma, M.H.; Kong, L.S. The bio-ecological characteristics of Reaumuria soongorica on the border of oasis at Hutubi, Xinjiang. Acta Phytoecol. Sin. 1998, 3, 237–244. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, J.Q.; Qiu, M.X.; Pu, J.C.; Lu, Z.M. The typical extreme xerophyte Reaumuria soongorica in the desert of China. Acta Bot. Sin. 1982, 24, 485–488. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, X.L.; Chen, J.G.W. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of ISSR genetic variation of Reaumuria soongorica population in Northwest of China. J. Desert Res. 2008, 28, 468–472. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu, Z.Y. Vegetation of China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1980; pp. 583–584, 597–598. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zeng, Y.J.; Wang, Y.R.; Zhang, B.L.; Zhuang, G.H. Reproductive characteristics of Reaumuria soongorica populations. Acta Pratacu Lturae Sin. 2002, 11, 66–71. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, X.W.; Yang, X.Y.; Wu, H.W.; Liu, X.Y.; Zhu, J.F.; Zhang, H.X. Transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes in Reaumuria soongorica seeds germination under NaCl stress. J. Nanjing For. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2019, 43, 28–36. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, X.W.; Yang, X.Y.; Wu, H.W.; Zhi, X.R.; Zhu, J.F.; Zhang, H.X. Effects of NaCl stress on the germination of Reaumuria soongorica and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage. Biotechnol. Bull. 2019, 35, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zeng, Y.J.; Wang, Y.R.; Zhuang, G.H.; Yang, Z.S. Seed germination responses of Reaumuria soongorica and Zygophyllum xanthoxylum to drought stress and sowing depth. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2004, 24, 1629–1634. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bai, J.; Xu, D.H.; Kang, H.M.; Chen, K.; Wang, G. Photoprotective function of photorespiration in Reaumuria soongorica during different levels of drought stress in natural high irradiance. Photosynthetica 2008, 46, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bai, J.; Gong, C.M.; Wang, G.; Kang, H.M. Antioxidative characteristics of Reaumuria soongorica under drought stress. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2010, 30, 2444–2450. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lv, M.T.; Yang, J.Y.; Yang, M.; Zhang, Z.R.; Ma, X. Effect of different drought stress conditions on germination of Reaumuria soongorica seeds. Chin. J. Grassl. 2010, 32, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chong, P.F.; Su, S.P.; Li, Y. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of Reaumuria soongorica from four geographical populations. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2011, 20, 26–33. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shi, Y.; Yan, X.; Zhao, P.; Yin, H.; Zhao, X.; Xiao, H.; Li, X.; Chen, G.; Ma, X.F. Transcriptomic analysis of a tertiary relict plant, extreme xerophyte Reaumuria soongorica to identify genes related to drought adaptation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cuperus, J.T.; Fahlgren, N.; Carrington, J.C. Evolution and functional diversification of miRNA genes. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Chen, X. MicroRNA biogenesis and function in plants. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 5923–5931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mallory, A.C.; Vaucheret, H. Functions of microRNAs and related small RNAs in plants. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, S31–S36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Xia, M.; Shen, F. Identification of miRNAs and their targets in cotton inoculated with verticillium dahliae by high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 14749–14768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhang, B. MicroRNA: A new target for improving plant tolerance to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1749–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lv, S.; Nie, X.; Wang, L.; Du, X.; Biradar, S.S.; Jia, X.; Weining, S. Identification and characterization of microRNAs from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by high-throughput sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 2973–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhou, Z.S.; Zeng, H.Q.; Liu, Z.P.; Yang, Z.M. Genome-wide identification of Medicago truncatula microRNAs and their targets reveals their differential regulation by heavy metal. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lertpanyasampatha, M.; Gao, L.; Kongsawadworakul, P.; Viboonjun, U.; Chrestin, H.; Liu, R.; Chen, X.; Narangajavana, J. Genome-wide analysis of microRNAs in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis L.) using high-throughput sequencing. Planta 2012, 236, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kulcheski, F.R.; de Oliveira, L.F.; Molina, L.G.; Almerao, M.P.; Rodrigues, F.A.; Marcolino, J.; Barbosa, J.F.; Stolf-Moreira, R.; Nepomuceno, A.L.; Marcelino-Guimaraes, F.C.; et al. Identification of novel soybean microRNAs involved in abiotic and biotic stresses. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Chen, L.; Wang, T.; Zhao, M.; Tian, Q.; Zhang, W.H. Identification of aluminum-responsive microRNAs in Medicago truncatula by genome-wide high-throughput sequencing. Planta 2012, 235, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y. Genome-wide identification of cold-responsive and new microRNAs in Populus tomentosa by high-throughput sequencing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 417, 892–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, Y.; Wan, L.; Bi, S.; Wan, X.; Li, Z.; Cao, J.; Tong, Z.; Xu, H.; He, F.; Li, X. Identification of drought-responsive micrornas from roots and leaves of alfalfa by high-throughput sequencing. Genes (Basel) 2017, 8, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Su, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, N.; Liu, F.; Su, W.; Xu, L.; Ahmad, W.; Wu, Q.; Guo, J.; Que, Y. Small RNA sequencing reveals a role for sugarcane miRNAs and their targets in response to Sporisorium scitamineum infection. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Aukerman, M.J.; Sakai, H. Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a MicroRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2730–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhou, M.; Li, D.; Li, Z.; Hu, Q.; Yang, C.; Zhu, L.; Luo, H. Constitutive expression of a miR319 gene alters plant development and enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic creeping bentgrass. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1375–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhao, B.; Ge, L.; Liang, R.; Li, W.; Ruan, K.; Lin, H.; Jin, Y. Members of miR169 family are induced by high salinity and transiently inhibit the NF-YA transcription factor. BMC Mol. Biol. 2009, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhou, L.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Hu, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Liang, C.; Wang, Y.; Sun, L.; et al. Integrated profiling of microRNAs and mRNAs: microRNAs located on Xq27.3 associate with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhou, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Kong, D.; Duan, M.; Luo, L. Genome-wide identification and analysis of drought-responsive microRNAs in Oryza sativa. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 4157–4168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, X.M. A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 2004, 303, 2022–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, J.W.; Wang, L.J.; Mao, Y.B.; Cai, W.J.; Xue, H.W.; Chen, X.Y. Control of root cap formation by MicroRNA-targeted auxin response factors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 2204–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Deng, M.; Liu, R.; Niu, S.; Fan, G. Identification and functional analysis of microRNAs and their targets in Platanus acerifolia under lead (Pb) stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7098–7111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Saminathan, T.; Bodunrin, A.; Singh, N.V.; Devarajan, R.; Nimmakayala, P.; Jeff, M.; Aradhya, M.; Reddy, U.K. Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) by high-throughput sequencing. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ramya, R.; Hervé, V.; Jerry, T.; Bartel, D.P. A diverse and evolutionarily fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Evelopment 2006, 20, 3407–3425. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang, C.; Zhang, B.; Ma, R.; Yu, M.; Guo, S.; Guo, L.; Korir, N.K. Identification of known and novel microRNAs and their targets in peach (Prunus persica) fruit by high-throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gao, J.; Ge, W.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Z.C.; Li, L.; Hou, D.; Hou, C.L. Identification and characterization of microRNAs at different flowering developmental stages in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) by high-throughput sequencing. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2015, 290, 2335–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chi, X.Y.; Yang, Q.L.; Chen, X.P.; Wang, J.Y.; Pan, L.J.; Chen, M.N.; Yang, Z.; He, Y.N.; Liang, X.Q.; Yu, S.L. Identification and characterization of microRNAs from peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by high-throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Baksa, I.; Nagy, T.; Barta, E.; Havelda, Z.; Várallyay, É.; Silhavy, D.; Burgyán, J.; Szittya, G. Identification of Nicotiana benthamiana microRNAs and their targets using high throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Zhu, J.; Yang, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H. Identification and target prediction of MicroRNAs in Ulmus pumila L. seedling roots under salt stress by high-throughput sequencing. Forests 2016, 7, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ma, L.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, S.; Zhou, J.; Zeng, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, J. An integrated analysis of miRNA and mRNA expressions in non-small cell lung cancers. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Liu, P.P.; Montgomery, T.A.; Fahlgren, N.; Kasschau, K.D.; Nonogaki, H.; Carrington, J.C. Repression of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR10 by microRNA160 is critical for seed germination and post-germination stages. Plant J. 2007, 52, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wu, G.; Wilen, R.W.; Robertson, A.J.; Gusta, L.V. Isolation, chromosomal localization, and differential expression of mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase and chloroplastic copper/zinc superoxide dismutase genes in wheat. Plant Physiol. 1999, 120, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Jagadeeswaran, G.; Saini, A.; Sunkar, R. Biotic and abiotic stress down-regulate miR398 expression in Arabidopsis. Planta 2009, 229, 1009–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, J.; Li, W.; Yang, W.; Qi, L.; Han, S. Identification of microRNAs in Caragana intermedia by high-throughput sequencing and expression analysis of 12 microRNAs and their targets under salt stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 1339–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhu, G.; Liu, Y.; Ye, N.; Liu, R.; Zhang, J. Involvement of the abscisic acid catabolic gene CYP707A2 in the glucose-induced delay in seed germination and post-germination growth of Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 2011, 143, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Okamoto, M.; Kuwahara, A.; Seo, M.; Kushiro, T.; Asami, T.; Hirai, N.; Kamiya, Y.; Koshiba, T.; Nambara, E. CYP707A1 and CYP707A2, which encode abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylases, are indispensable for proper control of seed dormancy and germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Matakiadis, T.; Alboresi, A.; Jikumaru, Y.; Tatematsu, K.; Pichon, O.; Renou, J.P.; Kamiya, Y.; Nambara, E.; Truong, H.N. The Arabidopsis abscisic acid catabolic gene CYP707A2 plays a key role in nitrate control of seed dormancy. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 949–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zhu, G.; Ye, N.; Zhang, J. Glucose-induced delay of seed germination in rice is mediated by the suppression of ABA catabolism rather than an enhancement of ABA biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Patrick, A.; Alan, H.; Baulcombe, D.C.; Harberd, N.P. Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development 2004, 131, 3357–3365. [Google Scholar]
  64. Millar, A.A.; Gubler, F. The Arabidopsis GAMYB-Like genes, MYB33 and MYB65, are microRNA-regulated genes that redundantly facilitate anther development. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Wang, X.; Zhang, T.; Wen, Z.; Xiao, H.; Yang, Z.; Chen, G.; Zhao, X. The chromosome number, karyotype and genome size of the desert plant diploid Reaumuria soongorica (Pall.) Maxim. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, Z.Q.; Zhu, S.Q.; Yu, R.P.; Li, L.Q.; Shan, G.Z.; You, W.R.; Zeng, X.X.; Zhang, C.W.; Zhang, L.J.; Song, R.H. China Saline Soil; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1994; Volume 250. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang, D.F.; Wang, S.J. Mechanism of freeze-thaw action in land salinization process—as an sample in west Jilin province. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 2000, 20, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  68. Xiao, H.Y.; Wen, G.C.; Liu, Q.M.; Li, G.T.; Zhao, X.R. Effects of winter and spring plant residue mulching on saline soil salt in Hetao Inner Mongolia. Agric. Res. Arid Areas 2018, 36, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  69. Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhai, L.L.; Xu, Y.Y.; Wang, L.J.; Zhu, X.W.; Gong, Y.Q.; Yu, R.G.; Cecilia, L.; Liu, L.W. Genome-wide identification and characterization of cadmium-responsive microRNAs and their target genes in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4271–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Khaldun, A.B.; Huang, W.; Liao, S.; Lv, H.; Wang, Y. Identification of microRNAs and target genes in the fruit and shoot tip of Lycium chinense: A traditional Chinese medicinal plant. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Friedländer, M.R.; Mackowiak, S.D.; Na, L.; Wei, C.; Nikolaus, R. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Langmead, B.; Trapnell, C.; Pop, M.; Salzberg, S.L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, R25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Wen, M.; Shen, Y.; Shi, S.; Tang, T. miREvo: An integrative microRNA evolutionary analysis platform for next-generation sequencing experiments. BMC Bioinform. 2012, 13, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Meyers, B.C.; Axtell, M.J.; Bartel, B.; Bartel, D.P.; Baulcombe, D.; Bowman, J.L.; Cao, X.; Carrington, J.C.; Chen, X.; Green, P.J.; et al. Criteria for annotation of plant MicroRNAs. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 3186–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Leti, F.; Malenica, I.; Doshi, M.; Courtright, A.; Van Keuren-Jensen, K.; Legendre, C.; Still, C.D.; Gerhard, G.S.; DiStefano, J.K. High-throughput sequencing reveals altered expression of hepatic microRNAs in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease–related fibrosis. Transl. Res. 2015, 166, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Unger, L.; Jagannathan, V.; Pacholewska, A.; Leeb, T.; Gerber, V. Differences in miRNA differential expression in whole blood between horses with sarcoid regression and progression. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hamzeiy, H.; Allmer, J.; Yousef, M. Computational methods for microRNA target prediction. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1107, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Wu, H.J.; Ma, Y.K.; Chen, T.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.J. PsRobot: A web-based plant small RNA meta-analysis toolbox. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, W22–W28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Allantaz, F.; Cheng, D.T.; Bergauer, T.; Ravindran, P.; Rossier, M.F.; Ebeling, M.; Badi, L.; Reis, B.; Bitter, H.; D’Asaro, M.; et al. Expression profiling of human immune cell subsets identifies miRNA-mRNA regulatory relationships correlated with cell type specific expression. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Small-RNA length distribution in Reaumuria soongorica seeds. CS, without salt stress; LS, optimum salt concentration for germination; MS, threshold salt concentration for germination.
Figure 1. Small-RNA length distribution in Reaumuria soongorica seeds. CS, without salt stress; LS, optimum salt concentration for germination; MS, threshold salt concentration for germination.
Plants 09 00351 g001
Figure 2. Numbers of conserved miRNAs per miRNA family in Reaumuria soongorica seeds. The x- and y-axes represent the different conserved miRNA families found in all nine libraries and the numbers of members in each family, respectively.
Figure 2. Numbers of conserved miRNAs per miRNA family in Reaumuria soongorica seeds. The x- and y-axes represent the different conserved miRNA families found in all nine libraries and the numbers of members in each family, respectively.
Plants 09 00351 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of relative expressions of differentially expressed miRNAs. (A) Relative expressions of miRNAs between LS (optimum salt concentration for germination) vs. CS (without salt stress) libraries. (B) Relative expressions of miRNAs between MS (threshold salt concentration for germination) and LS libraries.
Figure 3. Comparison of relative expressions of differentially expressed miRNAs. (A) Relative expressions of miRNAs between LS (optimum salt concentration for germination) vs. CS (without salt stress) libraries. (B) Relative expressions of miRNAs between MS (threshold salt concentration for germination) and LS libraries.
Plants 09 00351 g003
Figure 4. Numbers of mRNA targets of miRNAs based on an miRNA–mRNA correlation analysis of MS vs. LS. The y-axis indicates the number of target mRNAs in each miRNA, displayed on the x-axis, as revealed by the miRNA–mRNA correlation analysis. LS, optimum salt concentration for germination; MS, threshold salt concentration for germination.
Figure 4. Numbers of mRNA targets of miRNAs based on an miRNA–mRNA correlation analysis of MS vs. LS. The y-axis indicates the number of target mRNAs in each miRNA, displayed on the x-axis, as revealed by the miRNA–mRNA correlation analysis. LS, optimum salt concentration for germination; MS, threshold salt concentration for germination.
Plants 09 00351 g004
Figure 5. Hypothetical model of the miRNA regulatory network of seed germination response to salt stress in Reaumuria soongorica.
Figure 5. Hypothetical model of the miRNA regulatory network of seed germination response to salt stress in Reaumuria soongorica.
Plants 09 00351 g005
Table 1. Results of sRNA sequencing of Reaumuria soongorica seed libraries.
Table 1. Results of sRNA sequencing of Reaumuria soongorica seed libraries.
CategoryRaw ReadsN% > 10%Low Quality Reads5′ Adapter Contamine3′ Adapter NullPoly (A/T/G/C)Unique ReadsClean Reads
CS-113,869,156 (100.00%)564 (0.00%)19,225 (0.14%)33,490 (0.24%)224,816 (1.62%)12,005 (0.09%)1,315,05713,579,056 (97.91%)
CS-216,819,324 (100.00%)639 (0.00%)21,867 (0.13%)15,406 (0.09%)964,063 (5.73%)7615 (0.05%)1,376,04215,809,734 (94.00%)
CS-314,212,954 (100.00%)543 (0.00%)16,330 (0.11%)14,962 (0.11%)398,880 (2.81%)7654 (0.05%)1,156,05413,774,585 (96.92%)
LS-114,552,453 (100.00%)527 (0.00%)18,159 (0.12%)13,581 (0.09%)702,302 (4.83%)4291 (0.03%)993,15413,813,593 (94.92%)
LS-212,328,793 (100.00%)451 (0.00%)19,864 (0.16%)13,884 (0.11%)179,427 (1.46%)7466 (0.06%)1,442,73012,107,701 (98.21%)
LS-313,908,660 (100.00%)504 (0.00%)15,636 (0.11%)11,487 (0.08%)290,553 (2.09%)4276 (0.03%)818,19313,586,204 (97.68%)
MS-112,887,720 (100.00%)535 (0.00%)19,878 (0.15%)8991 (0.07%)270,670 (2.10%)3690 (0.03%)1,014,69212,583,956 (97.64%)
MS-217,338,149 (100.00%)680 (0.00%)23,377 (0.13%)17,416 (0.10%)490,306 (2.83%)12,336 (0.07%)2,026,13016,794,034 (96.86%)
MS-314,594,879 (100.00%)532 (0.00%)15,790 (0.11%)13,876 (0.10%)743,198 (5.09%)5511 (0.04%)1,145,45813,815,972 (94.66%)
CS, without salt stress; LS, optimal salt concentration for germination; MS, threshold salt concentration for germination.
Table 2. Numbers of reads classified according to the types of identified small RNAs.
Table 2. Numbers of reads classified according to the types of identified small RNAs.
Read TypesTotalSequences Mapped to GenomeKnown miRNANovel miRNARibosomal RNATransfer RNASmall Nuclear RNASmall Nucleolar RNATrans-Acting Small Interfering RNAsUnannotated
CS-19,127,1308,474,172 (92.85%)12,039 (0.14%)1244 (0.01%)1,245,902 (14.70%)10 (0.00%)2883 (0.03%)6680 (0.08%)641 (0.01%)7,204,773 (85.02%)
CS-28,007,7817,381,145 (92.17%)61,754 (0.84%)4490 (0.06%)1,644,956 (22.29%)15 (0.00%)3419 (0.05%)5609 (0.08%)3583 (0.05%)5,657,319 (76.65%)
CS-39,375,0078,975,019 (95.73%)20,397 (0.23%)1423 (0.02%)1,497,323 (16.68%)5 (0.00%)2433 (0.03%)3034 (0.03%)1038 (0.01%)7,449,366 (83.00%)
LS-17,270,9116,886,984 (94.72%)16,112 (0.23%)1515 (0.02%)1,366,452 (19.84%)9 (0.00%)3193 (0.05%)5135 (0.07%)1646 (0.02%)5,492,922 (79.76%)
LS-28,520,8457,737,807 (90.81%)32,024 (0.41%)3086 (0.04%)1,356,215 (17.53%)9 (0.00%)2832 (0.04%)7026 (0.09%)2159 (0.03%)6,334,456 (81.86%)
LS-39,018,1688,779,523 (97.35%)7119 (0.08%)604 (0.01%)1,482,050 (16.88%)6 (0.00%)2286 (0.03%)3677 (0.04%)419 (0.00%)7,283,362 (82.96%)
MS-18,981,6408,581,120 (95.54%)5456 (0.06%)138 (0.00%)1,452,970 (16.93%)7 (0.00%)2749 (0.03%)1702 (0.02%)121 (0.00%)7,117,977 (82.95%)
MS-210,925,7879,849,558 (90.15%)112,529 (1.14%)4902 (0.05%)1,888,880 (19.18%)10 (0.00%)4224 (0.04%)5038 (0.05%)6472 (0.07%)7,827,503 (79.47%)
MS-36,096,3675,522,031 (90.58%)51,689 (0.94%)2498 (0.05%)927,311 (16.79%)9 (0.00%)1767 (0.03%)4458 (0.08%)3196 (0.06%)4,531,103 (82.06%)
CS, without salt stress; LS, optimal salt concentration for germination; MS, threshold salt concentration for germination.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Yang, X.; Wu, H.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, H. miRNA–mRNA Integrated Analysis Reveals Roles for miRNAs in a Typical Halophyte, Reaumuria soongorica, during Seed Germination under Salt Stress. Plants 2020, 9, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030351

AMA Style

Zhang H, Liu X, Yang X, Wu H, Zhu J, Zhang H. miRNA–mRNA Integrated Analysis Reveals Roles for miRNAs in a Typical Halophyte, Reaumuria soongorica, during Seed Germination under Salt Stress. Plants. 2020; 9(3):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Huilong, Xiaowei Liu, Xiuyan Yang, Haiwen Wu, Jianfeng Zhu, and Huaxin Zhang. 2020. "miRNA–mRNA Integrated Analysis Reveals Roles for miRNAs in a Typical Halophyte, Reaumuria soongorica, during Seed Germination under Salt Stress" Plants 9, no. 3: 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop