Next Article in Journal
Effects of Nonthermal Plasma on Morphology, Genetics and Physiology of Seeds: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Foes or Friends: ABA and Ethylene Interaction under Abiotic Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Novel Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat (g-SSR) Markers and Their Validation for Genetic Diversity Analyses in Kalmegh [Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F.) Nees]
Previous Article in Special Issue
Arabidopsis Response to Inhibitor of Cytokinin Degradation INCYDE: Modulations of Cytokinin Signaling and Plant Proteome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/plants9121735
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Growing-Point Development of Non-Vernalized Wheat Plants under Long-Day Conditions

by
Milan Skalicky
1,*,
Jan Kubes
1,
Pavla Vachova
1,
Shokoofeh Hajihashemi
2,
Jaroslava Martinkova
1 and
Vaclav Hejnak
1
1
Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Plant Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Khuzestan 63616-47189, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(12), 1735; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121735
Submission received: 22 October 2020 / Revised: 6 December 2020 / Accepted: 8 December 2020 / Published: 9 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulation of Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses by Plant Hormones: Recent Advances)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The goal of this study was to determine whether the application of gibberellic acid (GA3) to seeds of common wheat varieties with different vernalization and photoperiod requirements affects the transition from vegetative to generative stage. Three varieties of wheat with different photoperiod sensitivities and vernalization were selected for the experiment—the winter varieties, Mironovskaya and Bezostaya, and the spring variety, Sirael. Seeds were treated with different concentrations of GA3 and plants were grown under long-day conditions with monitoring of their photosynthetic activity (Fv/Fm, Pn, E, gs). We monitored the activity of the photosynthetic apparatus by checking the plants to see if they were growing properly. The phenological stages of the wheat species were checked for indications of a transition from the vegetative to the generative stage. Selected concentrations of GA3 had no effect on the compensation of the vernalization process (transition to the generative phase). Chlorophyll fluorescence was one of the factors for monitoring stress. The variety, Bezostaya, is similar to the spring variety, Sirael, in its trends and values. The growth conditions of Bezostaya and Sirael were not affected by the activity of the photosynthetic apparatus. The development of growing points in winter varieties occurred at the prolonged single ridge stage. The spring variety reached the stage of head emergence after sixty days of growth (changes to the flowering phase did not appear in winter wheat). Application of GA3 to the seeds had no effect on the transition of the growing point to the double-ridge generative stage. The present study highlights the priming effect of GA3 on seeds of common wheat varieties with different vernalization and photoperiod requirements as it affected the transition from vegetative to generative stage.

1. Introduction

In wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), flowering is regulated genetically but is also influenced by environmental factors such as photoperiod and temperature [1]. The adaptability of wheat to a wide range of environments is favored by allelic diversity in genes regulating growth habit (VRN) and photoperiod response (PPD) [2,3]. Wheat is primarily a long-day (LD) plant that requires a photoperiod of fourteen hours or more [4]. The major environmental signal modulating flowering time is the photoperiod, the variation in day length during the growing season [5]. Natural variations in photoperiod response are mainly determined by allelic differences in the PPD1 gene [3,6] and the photoperiod requirement may differ at different stages of development. Plants generally have different photoperiod requirements prior to flowering and after flowering [7]. In addition to a specific photoperiod, wheat requires a period of low temperature (vernalization) for flowering to occur [8]. Genetic differences in the growth type are determined by the VRN1, VRN2 and VRN3 genes, each having two or more alleles [9]. For varieties to manifest spring growth, the dominant allele, Vrn, must be present in the genome, and dominant alleles are inhibitors of the vernalization requirement. In winter varieties, all three vrn loci occur in recessive form [10]. Vernalization requirements are strong, but not identical in all sensitive genotypes. The vernalization process can only take place in cells that are dividing [11,12]. Protein synthesis is activated in germinating wheat embryos after thirty minutes of water imbibition [13], but active DNA synthesis cannot be observed in such embryos until fifteen hours after germination [14].
Gibberellins (GAs) are an important group of diterpene plant hormones that control diverse aspects of growth and development of plants from germination to flowering to seed formation [15,16,17]. According to [18], GA3 increases the number of wheat plants able to reach the threshold of inductive generative development, but the timing of flowering is not affected. Studies of grasses [19] indicated that the application of GAs can replace the requirement for a long day and promote flowering. After a spray application of GA3, Sorghum bicolor created flower bases faster than control plants [20], but the chlorophyll content was not affected by GA3 treatment. The functionality of the photosynthetic apparatus in terms of the PSII level can be evaluated by measuring the fluorescence of chlorophyll a. Measuring chlorophyll fluorescence is a non-invasive method for determining PSII activity used in studying plant physiology [21] and in evaluating responses of plants to environmental stress [22].
The ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm), the potential photochemical effectiveness of electron transport in the PSII, is one of the most useful measurements for evaluating photosynthetic activity [23]. Fv/Fm is a general indicator of decreased function due to damage of the reactive center of photosystem II. It is frequently used to assess the quality of growth in wheat [24]. PSII activity is also quantitatively hereditary and sensitive to environmental changes [25]. Measurements of Fv/Fm are rapid and sensitive indicators of changes in photosynthesis as well as changes in the overall physiological condition of the plant caused by environmental stressors [26,27], such as water stress [28], osmotic stress and excessive irradiance [29]. Measurement of chlorophyll a fluorescence was also used to determine if anthocyanins could protect plants from photoinhibition damage to PS II [30]. It was used to evaluate the effect of potassium on PS II [31], and for monitoring low temperature damage to the photosynthetic apparatus [32]. The method is accurate, reliable, and widely applicable for evaluating the condition of the photosynthetic apparatus as indicated by the level of photosynthesis.
This investigation was based on the observation that treatment of dwarf varieties of rye with GAs increased the activity of α-amylase in the germinating caryopses [33]. Treating seeds with GA3 increased α-amylase expression through binding of a transcription factor to the gene, which activated it [34]. Dwarf rye varieties are able to synthesize GA3 under certain conditions, and the normal growth of these varieties can be restored by exposure to exogenous GA3 [35]. GA-deficient mutants require exogenous GA for germinating seeds to complete the germination process [36]. Application of GA3 to germinating seeds might similarly help in eliminating the vernalization requirement. A GA3 concentration of 50 mg L−1 had a positive effect on germination and seed development, but 200 mg L−1 was inhibitory [37].
The goal of this study was to determine whether and how the exogenous application of GA3 to seeds of common wheat varieties with different vernalization and photoperiod requirements affected the transition from vegetative to generative stage. Simultaneously, the effect of long-day was monitored in two varieties of winter wheat with different photoperiod-sensitivities. Exposure to long day irradiance is atypical for winter wheat varieties in the early stages of their development.

2. Results and Discussion

The theoretical maximum Fv/Fm for C3 plants is about 0.83 [38]. Sharma et al. [39] obtained Fv/Fm values of 0.79–0.84 for control wheat plants. In our experiments, the values of Fv/Fm in the spring variety Sirael and the winter variety Bezostaya in all treatments and samplings ranged from 0.80 to 0.82 (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). The measured values of Fv/Fm for these varieties are similar to the average values of stress-free C3 plants.

2.1. Results at Forty Days of Growth

Statistically significant lower values of Fv/Fm (0.53–0.61) were found for the winter variety, Mironovskaya, at all GA3 concentrations tested (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Lower values than optimal for C3 plants indicate the effect of adverse conditions such as water stress [40], heavy metals stress [41], and salt stress [42]. Sharma et al. [39] considered stress Fv/Fm values in wheat to be 0.75–0.82 compared to stress values in corn plants, which were in the range of 0.31 to 0.64 [43]. Values under 0.6 indicate that the stress is affecting PSII [38]. Changes in the content of pigment, the Fv/Fm ratio and non-photochemical quenching usually occur as a reaction to abiotic stress caused by high light levels [44]. From the experiments of [7], we see that long day irradiance can change the flowering time and cause the vegetative organs of wheat to develop insufficiently. This also results in lower values of Fv/Fm through effects on PSII. Sirael and Bezostaya showed +/- identical values, indicating that PSII was functional. Mironovskaya (40 days sampling) showed very low values of Fv/Fm, which were probably caused by the experiment environmental condition. The application of GA3 led to a slight improvement of these parameters (statistically inconclusive). Which may be related to the fact that GA3 priming supported the formation of chlorophyl or slowed down its decomposition [39]. Thus, the Mironovskaya variety showed a statistically non-significant increase in Fv/Fm with increasing GA3 concentration. These results confirm the findings of [45], which showed that the chlorophyll content gradually increased as GA3 concentration was increased, resulting in higher Fv/Fm values. Increasing the concentration of GA3 could have a favorable effect on the content of chlorophyll and thus the improvement of Fv/Fm parameters. The rate of Pn, E and gs was significantly lower in the Mironovskaya variety compared to other varieties, while GA3 treatments did not have a significant effect, similar to ryegrass [46].

2.2. Results at Fifty Days of Growth

Similar to the 40-day sampling results, the values of Fv/Fm at 50 days in Bezostaya (0.79–0.81) and Sirael (0.80–0.82) treated with GA3 corresponded to the characteristic values for C3 plants under optimal conditions. For Mironovskaya, the Fv/Fm values ranged from 0.71 to 0.8. Significantly, lower Fv/Fm values were measured in the Mironovskaya variety at GA3 concentrations of 0 mg L−1, 10 mg L−1 and 100 mg L−1. The results show an improvement in the parameter Fv/Fm in Mironovskaya, but a significant improvement in the Sirael and Bezostaya variety, which were in good condition (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Similarly, a trend towards improvement was indicated by Pn, E, gs.

2.3. Results at Sixty Days of Growth

On this sampling date, no statistically significant differences between Mironovskaya, Sirael and Bezostaya in the values of Fv/Fm were found for any of the varieties at any GA3 concentration tested. As stated above, the measured values and trends of Fv/Fm, Pn, E and gs of the spring variety Sirael and the winter variety Bezostaya were equal. On the last day of sampling, some measured physiological characteristics of PSII (Pn, E and gs) in the Mironovskaya variety were increased to the level of other varieties in comparison with the first screening.

2.4. Development of the Growing Point

An overview of developmental stages of the individual wheat varieties at 40, 50 and 60 days of growth is shown in Table 1. The double-ridge stage is considered the moment of transition of the growing point from the vegetative to generative stage of development [47,48,49]. According to [50], the double ridge in wheat cannot be achieved without exposure to low temperatures. Flood and Halloran [51] indicated that, in general, spring wheats were either not sensitive or moderately sensitive to vernalization. On the other hand, winter wheats had a strong response to vernalization and required an interval of cold temperatures for the induction of flowering [52]. The vernalization requirement of the Mironovskaya variety is 42–49 days, whereas in the Bezostaya variety, it is 35–42 days [53]. Some varieties are photoperiod-sensitive only if the vernalization requirement is met [54]. Whitechurch et al. [55] showed that only 15% of the non-vernalized plants had reached anthesis, while the remaining plants continued to be vegetative until they senesced. According to [8], in some genotypes, the need for exposure to low temperature may be replaced by the effect of short days. Evans [56] specified that the vernalization requirement in winter wheats could be fully substituted by short days at non-vernalizing temperatures of 16–21 °C.
The results of our experiments revealed that after 60 days, the growing points in the winter wheats, Mironovskaya and Bezostaya (Figure 4), were at the single-ridge stage at all GA3 concentrations; therefore, the transition into the generative stage did not take place. The control spring type, Sirael, however, was already in the head emergence stage after 60 days at all GA3 concentrations tested (Figure 5). We conclude that the Sirael variety does not require vernalization or a short-day photoperiod to transition to the generative stage. According to [57], despite the occurrence of flowering, it is concluded that the role of GA in this phenomenon is restricted to the activation of lateral meristems in the apex. Mironovskaya achieved head-emergence on average a week later than Bezostaya with the same vernalization period of eight weeks [58]. Unless Mironovskaya is exposed to sufficient vernalization, its development is delayed or can even result in absence of head emergence. In high-stem winter wheat varieties, the application of GA3 did not significantly enhance the transition from vegetative to generative flowering stage because plants treated with GA3 flowered only one to two days earlier than controls [35]. In our experiments, the transition to the generative stage did not take place in the non-vernalized winter varieties Bezostaya and Mironovskaya, even after treatment with GA3. A one-time application of GA3 by seed soaking had no effect on the cancellation of the vernalization requirement, the transition from the vegetative to the generative stage in varieties affected the progress of spike development. This differs from the results of [49,59] after a one-time application of GA3 during the vegetative phase. These results could be explained according to [18], who stated that a new synthesis or activation of GAs takes place during the second stage of vernalization after the effect of lower temperatures. That would explain why it is not possible to substitute GA application for vernalization on plants in their embryonic state.
As stated by [60], spring wheat varieties are not dependent on activity of VRN2, whether by its damage, loss or changes in the regulatory part of VRN1 and as result, they have no need of the vernalization process (Figure 6A). However, these plants still require the functional VRN1 gene; without it, they remain in vegetative forms. According to [5], VRN1 positively affects the changes in apex and production of GAs, when both processes are needed, and subsequently lead to spike development. VRN1 fusion accelerates the reproductive development in transgenic barley plants [52]. In the case of winter wheat varieties, lack of vernalization (Figure 6B) does not inhibit VRN2, which suppresses VRN1, and the differentiation to flowering apex does not occur here. Production of native GAs could also be decreased [5] and exogenous applications of these hormones (blue arrow) on seeds did not substitute for vernalization, as was verified with used concentrations (Figure 4) in the plants grown under the specified conditions (Table 2).
Nevertheless, they still had some positive effect on elongation of Phleum pratense tillers under shorter days [61] and the authors further discussed the sensitivity of different cultivars to this phytohormone in non-vernalized plants under different conditions. Regarding plants from the Poaceae family, previous research showed that GA, also applied on leaves as in the case of [61], substituted the effect of longer days in Lolium perenne [62]. It also supported the rate of leaf extension, but it had no effect on photosynthetic parameters or specific leaf area [46]. Winter wheat varieties, which went through lower temperatures, have suppressed VRN2 and VRN1 and can start the flowering process (Figure 6C) [5].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

Varieties of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with different sensitivities to photoperiod and vernalization were selected. Varieties used included: Bezostaya 1 (B)—winter wheat (vrn-A1, vrn-B1, vrn-D1) with minor sensitivity to photoperiod (Ppd-D1a) and weak vernalization requirement (4 weeks, chilling requirement depends also on temperature; 1–3 °C); Mironovskaya 808 (M)—winter wheat (vrn-A1, vrn-B1, vrn-D1), sensitive to photoperiod (Ppd-D1b) and strong vernalization requirement (8 weeks, chilling requirement depends also on temperature; 1–3 °C); and Sirael (S)—spring wheat (Vrn-A1a, Vrn-B1c, vrn-D1, vrn-B3), sensitive to photoperiod (Ppd-D1b), but not sensitive to vernalization (average period of head emergence 67 days; used as control). Information regarding the genetic background of these varieties follow [53,58,63].

3.2. Gibberellin GA3 Treatment of Seeds

Seeds of each variety were treated by soaking with four concentrations of GA3 (0, 10, 100 and 1000 mg L−1 (10 seeds, n = 3). According to [64], soaking seeds has a more long-term effect than spraying and the chemical is also more evenly absorbed by the seeds [65]. The powder form of GA3 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, minimum 90% total gibberellins) is insoluble in water and 70% medical-grade ethanol was added to the weighed amount of GA3 to dissolve it. The GA3 solution was then diluted with distilled water to the required concentrations. The control seeds were soaked in distilled water only (0 mg L−1). The seeds were placed into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes and covered with 1 mL GA3 solution at the desired concentrations (28.9 μM; 289 μM or 2.89 mM), or 1 mL of distilled water as control, and held at 21 °C for 16 h.

3.3. Growing Conditions

After GA3 treatment, the caryopses were rinsed and transferred to Petri dishes containing filter paper moistened with distilled water and held for 36 h at a temperature of 22 °C. This method of germinating the caryopses followed the recommendation of the ISTA (International Seed Testing Association, Bassersdorf, Switzerland). After two days, non-viable caryopses were removed, and germinated caryopses were transplanted into 11 × 11 × 12 cm containers filled with growing substrate. The growing substrate was composed of enriched peat (pH 5.5–6.0, incinerable compounds min. 35%, particles over 25 mm max. 5%, overall N: 80–120 mg L−1, P2O5: 50–100 mg L−1, K2O: 100–150 mg L−1) and sand at a ratio of 3:1. Plants were transferred to an air-conditioned chamber (Conviron E8 + control unit CMP6050) and grown under a long-day photoperiod of 16 h for 60 days (Table 2). The plants were fertilized with a 5% solution of NPK (15-5-5) (GSH NPK 15-5-5, Lovochemie a.s., Lovosice, Czechia) once every 14 days and with the microelement solution according to Benson once per month.

3.4. Photosynthesis Measurement

Measurements of potential photochemical effectiveness of electron transport as given by Fv/Fm, were performed on the plants and the stage of development of plants was established using micro-phenological degrees of the growing point [66]. These measurements were performed at 40, 50 and 60 days of growth. Given the possible differences of the developmental stages between the individual modifications, the time interval for sampling was selected regardless of their phenological stage of development. The phenological stage and uniformity of development of the individual varieties was controlled by sampling their growing points [66]. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters—minimum (F0) and maximum (Fm) were measured on two fully developed intact leaves of each variety on three different plants by the portable ADC:OSI FL 1 analyzer (ADC BioScientific Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK) with 1 s excitation pulse (660 nm) and saturation intensity 8000 μmol m−2 s−1 after 20 min dark-adaptation of the leaves. The maximal quantum efficiency of PSII was calculated as Fv/Fm = (Fm − F0)/Fm and the efficiency of the water-splitting complex on the donor side of PSII (as inferred from Fv/F0) [67]. Leaf gas exchange parameters—the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), rate of transpiration (E) and stomatal conductance (gs)—were measured at same time as the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, using the portable gas exchange system LCpro+ (ADC BioScientific Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK).

3.5. Identifying the Microphenological Stage of the Growing Point

The stage of phenological development was established according to the changes of the growing point. The stage was identified using the method of [47,66] for spring wheat. Three plants from each variety and each modification were sampled and their growing points extracted. The average phenological stage was established based on these points. The growing points were imaged with a stereoscopic microscope (Nikon SMZ645, Nikon, Japan) and the data were processed using NIS-Elements AR 4.5 software.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the effect of concentration of GA3 on the varieties. It was always compared at a single concentration. After obtaining significant results (p < 0.005), multiple comparisons using Tukey HSD test were applied to identify significant differences between treatments. Correlation coefficient was used for interspecies interaction. All analyses were performed using STATISTICA 13.5 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). Canoco 5 [68] was used for RDA (redundancy analysis) calculated from centered (but not standardized) data. This analysis was appropriate for finding the difference between varieties (M, B, S) with different concentrations.

4. Conclusions

The development of the growing point in winter varieties occurred during the prolonged single-ridge stage. In the control, the spring variety reached the stage of head emergence after 60 days of growth. A one-time application of GA3 through seed soaking had no effect on the transition of the growing point to the generative double-ridge stage.

Perspectives

The main fundamental issues of vernalization are how plants sense the signal of vernalization and calculate the dose of long-term cold exposure, along with how these processes can be applied to crop production. The winter wheat variety, Mironovskaya, is very sensitive to the photoperiod. This means that during flowering it should be exposed to a long day (14 + h); before that, it must be exposed to low temperatures for several weeks to promote vernalization. Application of GA3 on seeds did not replace the requirement for vernalization. The winter wheat variety, Bezostaya, is less sensitive to photoperiod (low temperatures for four weeks), and the application of GA3 also did not replace the requirement for vernalization. The spring variety, Sirael, is sensitive to photoperiods and very little to vernalization. Further research could include testing of GA3 application to short-straw winter wheat varieties, which could promote the prolonged growth and transition to the flowering phase and replace the requirement for vernalization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.H. and J.M.; methodology, V.H.; software, M.S. and P.V.; validation, M.S., J.K., P.V. and S.H.; formal analysis, P.V. and M.S.; investigation, S.H.; resources, J.M.; data curation, P.V.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S., V.H., P.V. and J.M.; writing—review and editing, S.H. and J.K.; visualization, M.S. and P.V.; supervision, V.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by an S-grant from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.

Acknowledgments

Seeds of all varieties were provided by the Gene Bank of Crop Research Institute in Prague, Czech Republic.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cockram, J.; Jones, H.; Leigh, F.J.; O’Sullivan, D.; Powell, W.; Laurie, D.A.; Greenland, A.J. Control of flowering time in temperate cereals: Genes, domestication, and sustainable productivity. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1231–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kippes, N.; Kippes, N.; Vangessel, C.; Hamilton, J.; Akpinar, A.; Budak, H.; Dubcovsky, J.; Dubcovsky, J.; Pearce, S. Effect of phyB and phyC loss-of-function mutations on the wheat transcriptome under short and long day photoperiods. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Royo, C.; Dreisigacker, S.; Soriano, J.M.; Lopes, M.S.; Ammar, K.; Villegas, D. Allelic Variation at the Vernalization Response (Vrn-1) and Photoperiod Sensitivity (Ppd-1) Genes and Their Association With the Development of Durum Wheat Landraces and Modern Cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, A.; Li, C.; Hu, W.; Lau, M.Y.; Lin, H.; Rockwell, N.C.; Martin, S.S.; Jernstedt, J.A.; Lagarias, J.C.; Dubcovsky, J. PHYTOCHROME C plays a major role in the acceleration of wheat flowering under long-day photoperiod. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 10037–10044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pearce, S.; Vanzetti, L.S.; Dubcovsky, J. Exogenous gibberellins induce wheat spike development under short days only in the presence of VERNALIZATION1. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1433–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Turner, A.; Beales, J.; Faure, S.; Dunford, R.P.; Laurie, D.A. Botany: The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science 2005, 310, 1031–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yunze, S.; Shuangsheng, G. Effects of photoperiod on wheat growth, development and yield in CELSS. Acta Astronaut. 2014, 105, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dubcovsky, J.; Loukoianov, A.; Fu, D.; Valarik, M.; Sanchez, A.; Yan, L. Effect of photoperiod on the regulation of wheat vernalization genes VRN1 and VRN2. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 60, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pugsley, A.T. A genetic analysis of the spring-winter habit of growth in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1971, 22, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, Y.; Sidhu, H.S.; Kaviani, M.; McElroy, M.S.; Pozniak, C.J.; Navabi, A. Application of image-based phenotyping tools to identify QTL for in-field winter survival of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 2591–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sung, S.; Amasino, R.M. Remembering winter: Toward a molecular understanding of vernalization. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 491–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Christy, B.; Riffkin, P.; Richards, R.; Partington, D.; Acuña, T.B.; Merry, A.; Zhang, H.; Trevaskis, B.; O’Leary, G. An allelic based phenological model to predict phasic development of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). F. Crop. Res. 2020, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Marcus, A.; Feeley, J.; Volcani, T. Protein Synthesis in Imbibed Seeds III. Kinetics of Amino Acid Incorporation Ribosome Activation, and Polysome Formation. Plant Physiol. 1966, 41, 1167–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, D.; Osborne, D.J. Ribosomal Genes and DNA Replication in Germinating Wheat Embryos. Nature 1970, 225, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yamaguchi, S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hedden, P. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2001, 20, 317–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Swain, S.M.; Singh, D.P. Tall tales from sly dwarves: Novel functions of gibberellins in plant development. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dubert, F.; Marcińska, I.; Biesaga-Kościelniak, J.; Szmider, I. The Effectiveness of Vernalization of Immature Embryos of Winter Wheat var. Grana as Related to Age and Exogenous Phytohormones. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1993, 170, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. King, R.W.; Evans, L.T. Gibberellins and Flowering of Grasses and Cereals: Prizing Open the Lid of the “Florigen” Black Box. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 307–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, I.J.; Foster, K.R.; Morgan, P.W. Effect of gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitors on native gibberellin content, growth and floral initiation in Sorghum bicolor. J. Plant Growth Regul. 1998, 17, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Murchie, E.H.; Lawson, T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: A guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3983–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Sayed, O.H. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in cereal crop research. Photosynthetica 2003, 41, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Demmig, B.; Björkman, O. Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77K) and photon yield of O2 evolution in leaves of higher plants. Planta 1987, 171, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, D.L.; Jing, R.L.; Chang, X.P.; Li, W. Quantitative trait loci mapping for chlorophyll fluorescence and associated traits in Wheat (Triticum aestivum). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 646–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, L.; Liu, B.; Meng, Q.; Tian, J.; Zhao, S. Identification of chromosome regions conferring dry matter accumulation and photosynthesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 2010, 171, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McMaster, G.S.; White, J.W.; Hunt, L.A.; Jamieson, P.D.; Dhillon, S.S.; Ortiz-Monasterio, J.I. Simulating the influence of vernalization, photoperiod and optimum temperature on wheat developmental rates. Ann. Bot. 2008, 102, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Čaňová, I.; Ďurkovič, J.; Hladká, D.; Lukáčik, I. Changes in stomatal characteristics and photochemical efficiency during leaf development in six species of Sorbus. Photosynthetica 2012, 50, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nakashima, T.; Araki, T.; Ueno, O. Photoprotective function of betacyanin in leaves of Amaranthus cruentus L. under water stress. Photosynthetica 2011, 49, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weng, J.H.; Chien, C.T.; Chen, C.W.; Lai, X.M. Effects of osmotic- and high-light stresses on PSII efficiency of attached and detached leaves of three tree species adapted to different water regimes. Photosynthetica 2011, 49, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Manetas, Y.; Buschmann, C. The interplay of anthocyanin biosynthesis and chlorophyll catabolism in senescing leaves and the question of photosystem II photoprotection. Photosynthetica 2011, 49, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.T.; Cao, P.; Wang, X.G.; Cao, M.J.; Yu, H.Q. Comparison of gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of low-potassium-tolerant and -sensitive soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars under low-potassium condition. Photosynthetica 2011, 49, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fracheboud, Y.; Jompuk, C.; Ribaut, J.M.; Stamp, P.; Leipner, J. Genetic analysis of cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 56, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zwar, J.A.; Chandler, P.M. α-Amylase production and leaf protein synthesis in a gibberellin-responsive dwarf mutant of “Himalaya” barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Planta 1995, 197, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, L.L.; Chen, X.Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xiong, F. Effects of exogenous gibberellic acid and abscisic acid on germination, amylases, and endosperm structure of germinating wheat seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 2016, 44, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pavlista, A.D.; Baltensperger, D.D.; Santra, D.K.; Hergert, G.W.; Knox, S. Gibberellic Acid Promotes Early Growth of Winter Wheat and Rye. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 05, 2984–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bewley, J.D. Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1055–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ghobadi, M.; Shafiei Abnavi, M.; Honarmand, S.J.; Ghobadi, M.E.; Reza Mohammadi, G. Effect of Hormonal Priming (GA3) and Osmopriming on Behavior of Seed Germination in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ritchie, G. A Chlorophyll Fluorescence: What Is It and What Do the Numbers Mean? USDA For. Serv. Proc. 2006, 34–43. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sharma, D.K.; Andersen, S.B.; Ottosen, C.O.; Rosenqvist, E. Wheat cultivars selected for high Fv/Fm under heat stress maintain high photosynthesis, total chlorophyll, stomatal conductance, transpiration and dry matter. Physiol. Plant. 2015, 153, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, S.; Chong, K. Remembering winter through vernalisation. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ahanger, M.A.; Aziz, U.; Sahli, A.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Combined kinetin and spermidine treatments ameliorate growth and photosynthetic inhibition in vigna angularis by up-regulating antioxidant and nitrogen metabolism under cadmium stress. Biomolecules 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ashraf, M.; Karim, F.; Rasul, E. Interactive effects of gibberellic acid (GA3) and salt stress on growth, ion accumulation and photosynthetic capacity of two spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Plant Growth Regul. 2002, 36, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Holá, D.; Benešová, M.; Honnerová, J.; Hnilička, F.; Rothová, O.; Kočová, M.; Hniličková, H. The evaluation of photosynthetic parameters in maize inbred lines subjected to water deficiency: Can these parameters be used for the prediction of performance of hybrid progeny? Photosynthetica 2010, 48, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pintó-Marijuan, M.; Munné-Bosch, S. Photo-oxidative stress markers as a measure of abiotic stress-induced leaf senescence: Advantages and limitations. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 3845–3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Brestic, M.; Zivcak, M.; Kalaji, H.M.; Carpentier, R.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. Photosystem II thermostability in situ: Environmentally induced acclimation and genotype-specific reactions in Triticum aestivum L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 57, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stapleton, J.; Jones, M.B. Effects of vernalization on the subsequent rates of leaf extension and photosynthesis of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Grass Forage Sci. 1987, 42, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gardner, J.S.; Hess, W.M.; Trione, E.J. Development of the Young Wheat Spike: A Sem Study of Chinese Spring Wheat. Am. J. Bot. 1985, 72, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Limin, A.; Corey, A.; Hayes, P.; Fowler, D.B. Low-temperature acclimation of barley cultivars used as parents in mapping populations: Response to photoperiod, vernalization and phenological development. Planta 2007, 226, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, L.; Hao, L.; Condon, A.G.; Hu, Y.G. Exogenous GA3 application can compensate the morphogenetic effects of the GA-responsive dwarfing gene Rht12 in bread wheat. PLoS ONE 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mosaad, M.G.; Ortiz-Ferrara, G.; Mahalakshmi, V.; Fischer, R.A. Phyllochron response to vernalization and photoperiod in spring wheat. Crop. Sci. 1995, 35, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Flood, R.G.; Halloran, G.M. Genetics and Physiology of Vernalization Response in Wheat. In Advances in Agronomy; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986; Volume 39, pp. 87–125. [Google Scholar]
  52. Deng, W.; Casao, M.C.; Wang, P.; Sato, K.; Hayes, P.M.; Finnegan, E.J.; Trevaskis, B. Direct links between the vernalization response and other key traits of cereal crops. Nat. Commun. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Košner, J.; Pánková, K. The effect of the homoeologous group 5 chromosomes with different Vrn loci on growth phases and quantitative characters of wheat. Euphytica 2001, 119, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. González, F.G.; Slafer, G.A.; Miralles, D.J. Vernalization and photoperiod responses in wheat pre-flowering reproductive phases. F. Crop. Res. 2002, 74, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Whitechurch, E.M.; Slafer, G.A.; Miralles, D.J. Variability in the duration of stem elongation in wheat genotypes and sensitivity to photoperiod and vernalization. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2007, 193, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Evans, L. Short Day Induction of Inflorescence Initiation in Some Winter Wheat Varieties. Funct. Plant Biol. 1987, 14, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Koller, D.; Highkin, H.R.; Caso, O.H. Effects of Gibberellic Acid on Stem Apices of Vernalizable Grasses. Am. J. Bot. 1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Košner, J.; Pánková, K. The detection of allelic variants at the recessive vrn loci of winter wheat. Euphytica 1998, 101, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pharis, R.P.; Evans, L.T.; King, R.W.; Mander, L.N. Gibberellins, Endogenous and Applied, in Relation to Flower Induction in the Long-Day Plant Lolium temulentum. Plant Physiol. 1987, 84, 1132–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Yan, L.; Loukoianov, A.; Blechl, A.; Tranquilli, G.; Ramakrishna, W.; SanMiguel, P.; Bennetzen, J.L.; Echenique, V.; Dubcovsky, J. The Wheat VRN2 Gene Is a Flowering Repressor Down-Regulated by Vernalization. Science 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Jokela, V.; Virkajärvi, P.; Tanskanen, J.; Seppänen, M.M. Vernalization, gibberellic acid and photo period are important signals of yield formation in timothy (Phleum pratense). Physiol. Plant. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. MacMillan, C.P.; Blundell, C.A.; King, R.W. Flowering of the Grass Lolium perenne. Effects of Vernalization and Long Days on Gibberellin Biosynthesis and Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 1794–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Milec, Z.; Tomková, L.; Sumíková, T.; Pánková, K. A new multiplex PCR test for the determination of Vrn-B1 alleles in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Breed. 2012, 30, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wahid, A.; Perveen, M.; Gelani, S.; Basra, S.M.A. Pretreatment of seed with H2O2 improves salt tolerance of wheat seedlings by alleviation of oxidative damage and expression of stress proteins. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Al-Khassawneh, N.M.; Karam, N.S.; Shibli, R.A. Growth and flowering of black iris (Iris nigricans Dinsm.) following treatment with plant growth regulators. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 107, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Waddington, S.R.; Cartwright, P.M.; Wall, P.C. A quantitative scale of spike initial and pistil development in barley and wheat. Ann. Bot. 1983, 51, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kalaji, H.M.; Bosa, K.; Kościelniak, J.; Żuk-Gołaszewska, K. Effects of salt stress on photosystem II efficiency and CO2 assimilation of two Syrian barley landraces. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 73, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Smilauer, P.; Leps, J. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using Canoco 5, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; ISBN 9781139627061. [Google Scholar]
Plants 09 01735 g001 550
Figure 1. Optimal quantum yield (Fv/Fm) after GA3 treatment. Variety: Mironovskaya (M), Bezostaya (B) and Sirael (S). Concentrations of GA3: 0, 10, 100 a 1000 µL L−1; measured on 40 days, 50 days and 60 days of growth. Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05. Treatments with the same sign did not differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Optimal quantum yield (Fv/Fm) after GA3 treatment. Variety: Mironovskaya (M), Bezostaya (B) and Sirael (S). Concentrations of GA3: 0, 10, 100 a 1000 µL L−1; measured on 40 days, 50 days and 60 days of growth. Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05. Treatments with the same sign did not differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 01735 g001
Plants 09 01735 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of priming GA3 at different concentrations on photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration (E). Variety: Mironovskaya (M), Bezostaya (B) and Sirael (S). Concentrations of GA3: 0, 10, 100 a 1000 µL L−1; measured on 40 days, 50 days and 60 days of growth. Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05. Treatments with the same sign did not differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effects of priming GA3 at different concentrations on photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration (E). Variety: Mironovskaya (M), Bezostaya (B) and Sirael (S). Concentrations of GA3: 0, 10, 100 a 1000 µL L−1; measured on 40 days, 50 days and 60 days of growth. Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05. Treatments with the same sign did not differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 01735 g002
Plants 09 01735 g003 550
Figure 3. Ordination diagram (RDA—Redundancy analysis). The biplot displays the varieties with different GA3 concentrations. The explained variability is shown for the axes in the figures. The GA3 concentration is shown by the color intensity of the symbol that represents varieties (table in graph).
Figure 3. Ordination diagram (RDA—Redundancy analysis). The biplot displays the varieties with different GA3 concentrations. The explained variability is shown for the axes in the figures. The GA3 concentration is shown by the color intensity of the symbol that represents varieties (table in graph).
Plants 09 01735 g003
Plants 09 01735 g004 550
Figure 4. The growing point in various concentrations of GA3 in the varieties after 60 days of growth. Varieties: Bezostaya (B), left panel, and Mironovskaya (M), right panel. Concentrations of GA3: 0, 10, 100 a 1000 mg L−1; Phenological stage: prolonged single ridge.
Figure 4. The growing point in various concentrations of GA3 in the varieties after 60 days of growth. Varieties: Bezostaya (B), left panel, and Mironovskaya (M), right panel. Concentrations of GA3: 0, 10, 100 a 1000 mg L−1; Phenological stage: prolonged single ridge.
Plants 09 01735 g004
Plants 09 01735 g005 550
Figure 5. Development of heads in the spring variety after 60 days of growth. Variety: Sirael (S); Concentrations of GA3: 0, 10, 100 a 1000 mg L−1; Phenological stage: head emergence.
Figure 5. Development of heads in the spring variety after 60 days of growth. Variety: Sirael (S); Concentrations of GA3: 0, 10, 100 a 1000 mg L−1; Phenological stage: head emergence.
Plants 09 01735 g005
Plants 09 01735 g006 550
Figure 6. Scheme: activation of flowering within spring (A) and winter varieties without (B) or with vernalization (C) according to [5]. (SD—short day, LD—long day, GAin—native phytohormones, GAex—applied GA3).
Figure 6. Scheme: activation of flowering within spring (A) and winter varieties without (B) or with vernalization (C) according to [5]. (SD—short day, LD—long day, GAin—native phytohormones, GAex—applied GA3).
Plants 09 01735 g006
Table
Table 1. Overview of developmental stages of wheat varieties at 40, 50 and 60 days of growth.
Table 1. Overview of developmental stages of wheat varieties at 40, 50 and 60 days of growth.
Days After405060
Variety/Conc.010100100001010010000101001000
MironovskayaEEEEEEEESRSRSRSRPSRPRSPSRPSR
BezostayaEEEEEEEESRSRSRSRPSRPSRPSRPSR
Sirael2 ND2 ND2 ND2 NDSESESESEHHHH
EE, early elongation, SR, single ridge, PSR, prolonged single ridge, 2 ND, second node detectable, SE, stem elongation, H, heading.
Table
Table 2. Growing conditions in the air-conditioned chamber.
Table 2. Growing conditions in the air-conditioned chamber.
Time
(16 h day/8 h night)		Temperature
°C		Relative Humidity
Φ (%)		Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density (PPDF)
µmol m−2 s−1
Dawn (5:00–6:00)1765280
Day (6:00–20:00)2060560
Nightfall (20:00–21:00)1765280
Night (21:00–5:00)15700
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skalicky, M.; Kubes, J.; Vachova, P.; Hajihashemi, S.; Martinkova, J.; Hejnak, V. Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Growing-Point Development of Non-Vernalized Wheat Plants under Long-Day Conditions. Plants 2020, 9, 1735. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121735

AMA Style

Skalicky M, Kubes J, Vachova P, Hajihashemi S, Martinkova J, Hejnak V. Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Growing-Point Development of Non-Vernalized Wheat Plants under Long-Day Conditions. Plants. 2020; 9(12):1735. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121735

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skalicky, Milan, Jan Kubes, Pavla Vachova, Shokoofeh Hajihashemi, Jaroslava Martinkova, and Vaclav Hejnak. 2020. "Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Growing-Point Development of Non-Vernalized Wheat Plants under Long-Day Conditions" Plants 9, no. 12: 1735. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121735

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop