Next Article in Journal
Russeting in Apple Is Initiated After Exposure to Moisture Ends—I. Histological Evidence
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Characterization, Antimicrobial Activity, and Biocompatibility of Autopolymerizing Acrylic Resins Coated with Reynoutria elliptica Extract
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/plants9101294
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Peptide Extracts from Seven Medicinal Plants Discovered to Inhibit Oomycete Phytophthora infestans, a Causative Agent of Potato Late Blight Disease

by
Eugene A. Rogozhin
1,2,3,*,
Alexey S. Vasilchenko
4,
Anna S. Barashkova
1,4,
Alexey N. Smirnov
5,
Sergey K. Zavriev
1 and
Vladimir P. Demushkin
1,†
1
Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institite of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia
2
Gause Institute of New Antibiotics, 119021 Moscow, Russia
3
All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, 196608 St.-Petersburg-Pushkin, Russia
4
Institute of Biological and Agricultural Biology (X-Bio) Tyumen State University, Russian Federation, 625003 Tyumen, Russia
5
Timiryazev Russian State Agrarian University, 127550 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Deceased on 6 October 2014.
Plants 2020, 9(10), 1294; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101294
Submission received: 13 September 2020 / Revised: 22 September 2020 / Accepted: 24 September 2020 / Published: 30 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Protection and Biotic Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We report the inhibitory effect of peptide extracts obtained from seven medicinal plants against a causative agent of late blight disease Phytophthora infestans. We find that all the extracts possess inhibitory activity toward the zoospores output, zoosporangium germination, and the development of P. infestans on potato disc tubers at different quantitative levels. Based on the biological effects detected, an extract of common horsetail (Equisetum arvense) biomass is recognized as the most effective and is selected for further structural analysis. We perform a combination of amino acid analysis and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, which reveal the presence of Asn/Asp- and Gln/Glu-rich short peptides with molecular masses in the range of 500–900 Da and not exceeding 1500 Da as the maximum. Analytical anion-exchange HPLC is successfully applied for separation of the peptide extract from common horsetail (E. arvense). We collect nine dominant components that are combined in two groups with differences in retention times. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the prevalent compounds after analytical ion-exchange HPLC allows us to identify them as peptide fragments of functionally active proteins associated with photosynthesis, aquatic transport, and chitin binding. The anti-oomycete effects may be associated with the conversion of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase to produce a number of biologically active anionic peptides with possible regulatory functions. These data inform our knowledge regarding biologically active peptide fragments; they are the components of programmed or induced proteolysis of plant proteins and can realize secondary antimicrobial functions.

1. Introduction

Plant diseases caused by oomycetes are a primary problem for agriculture in the world [1]. Late blight disease is one of the most important and dangerous potato and tomato diseases with the potential for practical annihilation of potato plants [2,3]. The pathogen affects plants in damp conditions and causes necrosis of the leaves and rapid tuber decomposition [3,4]. Late blight can progress very quickly in both organic and traditional agriculture, even with extensive fungicide application. Phytopathogenic fungi and oomycetes can be killed via alternative agents [5,6,7,8] with limited environmental pollution, unlike traditional pesticides. This is important as pathogenic microorganisms have become increasingly resistant to various chemical pesticides.
Renewable resources are generally preferred based on sustainability [9,10,11]. Many studies have evaluated natural variants regarding the limitation of late blight including antagonistic systems based on the application of other fungal species [12] and the participation of rhizosphere bacteria in the defense system of tomatoes from late blight disease [13,14,15,16,17]. Other approaches are based on the application of micro- and nano-particles from natural polymers to control the oomycete development from the Phytophthora genus [18,19]. There are currently many bioactive substances against phytopathogenic organisms, but they do not typically have a stable effect against late blight inhibition [20,21].
Other options include composts [20,22], fungal secondary metabolites [23,24,25,26], and plant derivation [27]. Coniferous and flowering plant ethanol extracts [28,29], including lichens [30], have been used also. Crude plant extracts also can have antifungal properties [31,32,33]. Thus, scientific research on the plant extracts is required to better understand their efficacy and the mechanism to control diseases and insect pests of cultivated plants in the majority of developing countries [34]. The antitumor activity of peptide extracts from medicinal plants was previously shown [35,36]. Here, we screen plant peptide extracts that suppress agents of late blight and perform purification and biochemical analysis on the most active variant.

2. Results

2.1. Screening of Plant Peptide Extracts to Suppress Phytophthora infestans In Vitro

During this study, a number of medicinal plants that are donors of peptide extracts were selected for the following screening against the late blight disease oomycete Phytophthora infestans. Here, we successfully developed a method with limited acid hydrolysis of the total protein content to obtain a standardized composition revealing the biological activity independently. To explore the antimicrobial activity of the peptide extracts, we applied their influence on the indirect and direct germination of P. infestans zoosporangia in laboratory conditions using optical microscopy. We performed a two-fold dilution series for experimental measurements of the IC50 and ICmin values (Table 1). The most pronounced inhibition was evaluated using the direct germination of zoosporangia using a growing tube at an ICmin from 0.25 to 2.0 mg/mL. The mixture of three plants (PE-PM) was two-fold more active (0.125 mg/mL) than the extracts obtained from the individual plants (PE-Hp and PE-Cs). This displayed an equal activity against indirect germination (output of zoospores from the zoosporangia) compared with the other variants tested to reveal essentially less biological action. The antimicrobial effects of all peptide extracts were lower relative to the direct and indirect oomycete germination (0.5–2.0 mg/mL) based on the IC50 values; however, the peptide extract in a mixture demonstrated significantly reduced IC50 values (0.25 mg/mL) (Figure 1).
Additionally, some morphological changes of the oomycete structures were observed after incubation with the peptide extracts. The PE-PM at a maximal concentration (2 mg/mL) caused partial destruction and covering lysis of 18% fungal cells in the treated sample at a level of 15–18% (Table 1). However, there was often no deformation of the zoosporangia, zoospores, and mycelium when a single plant extract was added.

2.2. The Antifungal Activity of Plant Peptide Extracts toward P. infestans by Inoculation of Potato Tuber Discs

Peptide extracts inhibited P. infestans in vitro at a different level. We evaluated the growth and development of the oomycete when it was inoculated on the surface of potato tuber discs. This method was more objective for understanding the real three-sided interaction between active peptides inside the extracts and understanding the phytopathogen and plant tissue responsible for inoculation from plant innate immunity. The results showed the ability of the peptide extracts to inhibit the appearance of P. infestans symptoms (necrotic spots and sporiferous layers) even 96 h after inoculation: thus, the average area of the potato disc damage was measured to be less than 5% (excepting PE-Cm and PE-Ih) relative to the control (approximately 20% of the oomycete development) at the highest concentration tested (2 mg/mL) (Figure 2). PE-Eqi could induce nearly the complete inhibition of P. infestans symptoms. After 120 h of incubation, the peptide extracts retained a degree of inhibition relative to the positive control (approximately 40% of the oomycete development on the potato disc surface).
Finally, most variants effectively suppressed P. infestans on the plant tissue within 144 h of incubation (a final registration point). The peptide extract from common horsetail (E. arvense) revealed the most pronounced effect in a time-dependent manner (Figure 3). Thus, combining the results of two independent assays suggested that the peptide extracts from certain medicinal plants can act toward P. infestans at a different level. This is likely associated with the composition of polypeptides that is unique to each plant.

2.3. Initial Structural Characterization of PE-Eqi

Based on the screening results, PE-Eqi from the common horsetail (E. arvense) was selected for further investigation. PE-Eqi had the most pronounced inhibition activity of all individual plants and contributed to a high level of activity in the PE-Pm mixture. PE-Eqi was acknowledged to be the most attractive concentrate; it contained a set of polypeptides with the highest activity to suppress P. infestans. Thus, it was a resultant candidate to be an active substance for a novel biopesticide. The total yield of polypeptides in this method was 110–120 mg per 100 g of plant material. The amino acid composition of PE-Eqi led to a significant content of Gln/Glu and Asn/Asp (more than 40% from the total weight); these were presented as dicarboxylic acids. The total peptide material contained about 90% of the extract mass. MALDI-MS analysis of the total peptide showed that the most intensive m/z signals were measured in the range of 500–900 Da and did not exceed 1500 Da as the maximum (Figure 4). This led to a specified type of limited acidic hydrolysis to obtain reasonably short polypeptides.

2.4. HPLC Analysis of PE-Eqi and Structure Determination of Individual Compounds

The next stage of investigation was to separate the PE-Eqi via analytical HPLC. The peptide extract was initially applied on a reverse-phase column for further fractionation over a linear gradient of organic solvents; however, we did not show any qualitative separation in resolution. Thus, there were only four main peaks visualized in the profile (Figure 5B). Subsequentially, we performed ion-exchange HPLC and attempted to disperse compounds that were localized in the extract using the anion-exchange immobile phase. The amino acid analysis suggested a prevalence of dicarboxylic acids that were negatively charged. Therefore, we could discover individual components combined into the two main groups: high hydrophilic and high hydrophobic (Figure 5A). Thus, nine compounds were manually collected in which four (№ 1–4) were eluted from the column from 10 to 30 min, and five of them (№ 5–9) had a pronounced retention time (65–75 min).
Our approach could achieve high-resolution separation of the compounds that differed via the presence of negatively charged groups (hypothetically hydroxyls) unlike the separation of hydrophobic liquid chromatography. To provide structural identification of the peptide components located inside the PE-Eqi extract, all samples were manually collected and analyzed with MALDI-TOF MS; N-terminal amino acid sequencing using the Edman automated degradation technique. The sequences were selected for homology searching in NCBI databases using the BLASTP algorithm. The results are presented in Table 2.
We were able to sequence seven from nine components which were short polypeptide chains from 7 to 14 amino acid residues in length. All identified peptides were linear, cysteine-free, and mainly enriched with Asp/Glu as well as polar and non-polar uncharged residues. This was due to the amino acid composition results. Searching for possible homologous sequences among Viridiplantae (taxid: 33,090) in whole, and Equisetum spp. (taxid: 3257) in particular, identified three peptide fragments of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, a key plant enzyme located in chloroplasts.
There were two short peptide fragments that were homologous to aquaporins and chitinases. These are proteins with defense functions. They are mainly inducible and responsible for external biotic stress, in particular fungal infections by pest damage that have not yet been studied. There were no peptides that could be gene-encoded, only fragments of protein hydrolysis. Finally, the molecular masses were measured for the dominant individual peptides located in a range from 600 to 1500 Da, whereas the total peptide extract was composed of 500–900 Da on average. This phenomenon can be associated with the ionization peculiarities of the peptides in a mixture compared to the individuals; this was not excluded in the partial fragmentation.

3. Discussion

Here, we studied plant peptide extracts for activity against potato late blight. We used partial acidic hydrolysis to obtain short peptides with relatively predetermined molecular masses. These peptide extracts were previously shown to have cytotoxic and antitumor activities in vitro and in vivo models [35,36]. The main functional aspect of this study consisted of screening these extracts for inhibition activity toward oomycete P. infestans—the causative agent of potato and tomato late blight—which is one of the most economically important crop diseases leading to significant losses of plant production annually around the world [37].
Considering this, natural target extracts obtained from accessible plant species are potentially good additions to chemical fungicides to decrease the residual quantities inside the final production of plant cultivation and the environment as a whole, and to make the technology of integrated plant protection less expensive. Our findings show that peptide extracts against P. infestans, as determined by optical microscopy, had a high level of inhibition. There are some mentions confirming the application of aquatic and organic plant extracts to suppress P. infestans and other phytopathogenic oomycetes; these are potent agents for biocontrol [38,39,40,41]. Generally, the target activity is associated with secondary metabolites of a different chemical nature and not with polypeptides.
It is typical to provide testing of the anti-oomycete activity of the peptide extracts to suppress the growth and development of P. infestans, including infection of the potato tuber surface. We could not confirm the same results; only a limited number of extracts displayed a strong level of pathogen deterrence in a time-dependent manner. These results are not surprising because the addition of plant tissue (slices of potato tubers) to the experiment led to the appearance of molecular interactions between the plant, its specific pathogen, and the external agent (a peptide extract). The activity was less effective because P. infestans could increase in the virulence level.
Several studies reported the molecular mechanisms of the Solanaceae plant’s resistance to P. infestans based on genomic and transcriptomic data analysis [42,43], the expression of genes encoding matrix metalloproteinases, the miRNA [44,45,46], and the inducible gene expression coding PR-proteins [47,48,49]. Taking another view, P. infestans is known to infect plant hosts that can realize protein virulence factors and that are activated in contact with a plant surface. These factors are enzymes (cyclophilins, phospholipases, and cutinases) [50,51,52], certain extracellular proteins that are represented by serine- and metalloproteinases [53], and a widely represented class of infection-associated effector proteins (with an N-terminal RXLR motif) [54,55].
We note that all antimicrobial peptide extracts were obtained via the efficient method of peptide material extraction. This provided a nearly complete absence of certain admixtures, including carbohydrates, bioflavonoids, steroids, glycosides, vitamins, and other theoretical dissoluble natural secondary metabolites [36]. Thus, all peptide extracts obtained using this original method were reproduced on their composition. These findings might have commercial value in the case of potential applications in industry.
The peptide extract isolated from common horsetail (E. arvense) demonstrated the most pronounced suppression of P. infestans compared to the other plants via two independent assays. This plant is primitive and ancient and belongs to the Equisetaceae family from the Polypodiophyta division. It is a good source of natural compounds, including antioxidants [56], flavonoids [57], and biologically-active carbohydrates [58]. E. arvense is a model object to isolate for the structural analysis of key proteins involved in the plant metabolism, including ferredoxin I and II isoforms [59], and cytochrome c reductase [60]. There currently is not any peptide isolated from common horsetail reported, including antimicrobials.
Previous authors reported that ethanolic extracts from E. arvense induced anticancer effects to suppress lung carcinoma cells at 100–150 µg/mL [61]. Hydroethanolic extracts were more effective as antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory agents in mice [62] and had a negative influence on Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides; these produce mycotoxins in stored maize kernels (Zea mays) [63]. Aquatic extracts of E. arvense could possess antibacterial action toward clinical Escherichia coli involving the disruption of the biofilm formation [64].
Our results are the first mention that antimicrobial substances derived from E. arvense are peptides. A comparison of reversed-phase and anion-exchange HPLC for the isolation of compounds from the E. arvense peptide extract suggested that they are relatively hydrophilic and enriched by negatively charged amino acid residues. The active peptide extract contained a set of major components—the majority of which were fragments of partial hydrolysis of chloroplast proteins. Inside the extract, we identified peptide fragments that were members of the three main groups of plant proteins: aquaporins [65], chitinase A [66], and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) [67].
Plant chitinases are known to have defense functions and are responsible for biotic stresses; however, the enzyme from common horsetail (E. arvense) belongs to class IIIb, for which no antifungal activity was detected. Thus, we may suppose that the antitumor activity previously detected [36], as well as the anti-oomycete effect described in this work may be associated with the target conversion of Rubisco to produce a number of biologically active anionic peptides with possible regulatory functions.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Medicinal Plants

To screen for antifungal activity in vitro, we selected plants used in traditional medicine: greater celandine (Chelidonium majus), PE-Cm; elecampane (Inula helertium), PE-Ih; common horsetail (Equisetum arvense), PE-Eqi; sweet bay (Laurus nobilis), PE-Ln; green tea (Camellia sinensis), PE-Cs; touch-and-heal (Hypericum perforatum), PE-Hp; and a mixture of the three plants combined (elecampane, greater celandine, and common horsetail), PE-Pm. Initially, all plant raw material was collected manually [35,68].

4.2. Oomycete Origin and Cultivation Conditions

The oomycete P. infestans strain OSV 12 was received from the Institute of Plant Protection (Priluki, Minsk District, the Republic of Belarus). Colonies of P. infestans were being grown in oat nutrient growth medium at the temperature of 14–16 °C for 12–14 days.

4.3. Peptide Extracts

To obtain the peptide extracts, the original procedure was performed to remove all high-molecular weight components (preliminary proteins and carbohydrates) and secondary metabolites. Taking 10 g of the raw plant, over ground material, was ground, soaked in 500 mL of 1 M acetic acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and left for 1 h at room temperature. During the exposition, the suspension was obtained using ultrasonication (five times through 10 min). Subsequently, the suspension was heated at 100 °C for 30 min, cooled, and centrifuged (75,000× g, 40 min, using a J2-21 (Beckman, Krefeld, Germany). Acetone was added to collect the supernatant at a ratio of 2:5 and precipitated at +4 °C overnight. Then, a pellet was separated by centrifugation (40,000× g, 40 min, J2-21 (Beckman, Germany). To improve the dissolving of a peptide extract, the pellet was dissolved in 100 mM acetic acid and repeatedly centrifuged (twice, 40,000× g, 20 min). To remove residual acidic quantities, the pellet was lyophilized twice by dissolving in 50 mL of MQ water.

4.4. Amino Acid Analysis

The amino acid composition was determined as described previously [36]. The analysis was performed on a Biotronik LC-3000 amino acid analyzer (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). Regarding each reaction, 300 µg of the extract was selected for further acidic hydrolysis. Ion exchange HPLC was performed on a LC 3000 amino acid analyzer (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). The peptide extracts were dissolved in 60 μL of a buffer containing 0.82 g of sodium acetate, 75 mL of methanol, 0.5 mL of glacial acetic acid, 100 μL of caprylic acid, and 10% formic acid in 1 L (solvent A), where the concentration of the peptide extracts was 10 mg/mL, and applied in a 1.0 × 125 mm column with VT-2410 resin (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) equilibrated with solvent A.
Concerning elution, we used: solvent A, containing 1 g of 8.2 g of sodium acetate, 75.0 mL of methanol, 5.0 mL of glacial acetic acid, 4.0 mL of formic acid, and 100 μL of caprylic acid, pH 3.3; buffer containing 1 L 4.0 g of sodium hydroxide, 2.7 mL of glacial acetic acid, 2.5 mL of formic acid, and 100 μL of caprylic acid, pH 3.6 (solvent B); buffer containing 4.0 g of sodium hydroxide in 1 L, 2.7 mL of glacial acetic acid, 2.5 mL of formic acid, and 100 μL of caprylic acid, pH 4.9 (solvent C); and buffer containing 1 L of 1.0 mL of glacial acetic acid, 83 mM trisodium phosphate, 1.0 g EDTA, and 100 μL caprylic acid, pH 10.5 (solvent D). The samples were eluted sequentially with solvents A (30.5 min at 40 °C), B (7.5 min at 60 °C), C (12 min at 60 °C), and D (27 min at 60 °C) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. To visualize, a ninhydrin solution containing 20 g of ninhydrin, 0.6 g of hydrindantin din, 50 mL of phenol, 550 mL of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether, and 400 mL of 4 M sodium acetate (pH 5.5) was used. The detection was monitored at 570 nm.

4.5. MALDI TOF Mass Spectrometry

The mass spectra were measured using an Ultraflex TOF/TOF instrument (Bruker, Berlin, Germany) in a positive ion mode. The peptide extracts were dissolved in 30% MeCN at a final concentration of about 500 pmoles/µL, and 1 µL was mixed with an equal volume of a matrix (2,5-dihydroxybensoic acid) (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA), dried in air prior to analysis. The data obtained were processed with FlexAnalysis software.

4.6. Ion-Exchange HPLC

Ion-exchange separation was provided using the Agilent 1200 Series (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The peptide extracts (0.5 mg) were dissolved in 50 µL of 50 mM PBS buffer (pH 8.0) and applied on a Luna SAX 4 × 250 mm column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) equilibrated with the same solvent (buffer A). Peptides were eluted from the column using a linear gradient of buffer B (PBS and 500 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. UV detection was monitored at 220 nm.

4.7. Reversed-Phase HPLC

To perform RP-HPLC, a Du Pont 8800 instrument (Du Pont, Wilmington, DE, USA) was used. The peptide extracts (0.5 mg) were dissolved in 50 µL of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and applied on a Nucleosil® 5/C18 4 × 250 mm column (Macherey–Nagel GmbH and Co, Düren, Germany) equilibrated with 0.1% TFA (buffer A). The peptides were eluted from the column using a linear gradient of buffer B (80% MeCN, 0.1% TFA) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The UV detection was monitored at 220 nm (Uvicord SII detector, GE HealthCare, Madison, WI, USA).

4.8. Edman Sequencing

N-terminal amino acid sequencing was conducted on a PPSQ-33A sequencer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Approximately 500 pmoles of each compound purified by HPLC was analyzed. The identification of amino acid residues was performed using PTH derivatives using LabSolutions software.

4.9. Antifungal Assays In Vitro

The antifungal activity of the peptide extracts was tested using a microtiter-plate assay by measuring the inhibition of the germination of zoosporangiums as described [69]. Two-fold dilutions of extracts in pure water were prepared (from 2000 to 125 μg·mL−1) and added to the zoosporangium suspension in the water, containing, on average, from 5000 cells/mL. The plates were incubated at 15 °C and scored after 4 h (output of zoospores/direct germination) and 48 h (zoosporangium germination/indirect germination). Inhibition of the zoospores output (indirect germination) was estimated as the number of remaining zoospores relative to the total number (Each replicate is represented by calculation of cell quantity on 10 visual fields at optical microcopy). The inhibition of zoosporangium germination (direct germination) was estimated as the number of germinated zoosporangiums relative to their total number. These rates were expressed in ICmin (effect of inhibition more than 15%) and IC50 values showing the plant extract concentration required for the growth inhibition of 50% of the remaining zoospores or zoosporangium. The morphological changes in the microorganisms also were recorded. The experiments were conducted using two biological repetitions in three replicates of each variant.

4.10. Antifungal Assay by Inoculation of Potato Tuber Discs

The biological activity of peptide extracts also was assayed by estimating the degree of inhibition of P. infestans development on potato tuber discs [70]. Two potato tuber discs of similar size were placed in each Petri dish. The peptide samples were mixed with 50 µL of zoosporangium suspension in distilled water (at an average of 5000 zoosporangiums mL−1) to a final peptide extract concentration of 0.125–2.0 mg/mL and incubated at 20 °C for 2 h. The plant extract sample was applied to the center of each potato tuber disc. Potato discs infected with the zoosporangium suspension without peptide extract served as controls. The Petri dishes with infected potato tuber discs were incubated at 20 °C for 120 h. The disease severity was assayed 96, 120, and 144 h after inoculation by measuring the infected area of each disc and scored, denoting the absence of inhibition compared with the controls. A degree of infection is determined by comparison of a relative square of damage according to a full square of a tuber disc based on Abode Photoshop for Windows software. Ten discs were analyzed in each of three independent experiments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A.R., V.P.D.; methodology, E.A.R., A.S.B., A.N.S.; software, V.P.D.; validation, E.A.R., S.K.Z.; formal analysis, E.A.R., A.S.V.; data curation, E.A.R., A.S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A.R., A.S.V.; writing—review and editing, E.A.R., A.S.V., A.S.B., S.K.Z.; visualization, E.A.R., A.S.B., S.K.Z.; supervision, E.A.R., V.P.D.; project administration, E.A.R.; funding acquisition, E.A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant № 19-76-30005) (section devoted to antimicrobial activity of the plant peptide extracts against Phytophthora infestans) and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant № 18-34-20058) (section devoted to structural analysis of the peptide extract from common horsetail (Equisetum arvense) and fractionating by HPLC).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Inna I. Tepkeeva (from the Laboratory of Peptide Chemistry Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry) for help in obtaining the plant peptide extracts, and Dmitry Zaytsev (from the Department of Plant Protection, the Sector of Agricultural Phytopathology Timiryazev Moscow State Agrarian University) for fruitful discussions and advises concerning antimicrobial assays).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

MALDI-TOF MSmatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
Asnasparagine
Aspaspartate
Glnglutamine
Gluglutamate
HPLChigh performance liquid chromatography
IC50inhibition concentration caused half-effect
ICmininhibition concentration caused sub-effect (15%);
NCBINational Center of Biotechnology Information, USA
BLASTPbasic local alignment search tool protein;
MQdeionized water
EDTAethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
PBSphosphate-buffered saline
NaClsodium chloride
UVultraviolet
RP-HPLCreversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography;
MeCNacetonitrile
PTHphenylthiohydantoin

References

  1. Gisi, U.A.L. Advances in Downy Mildew Research; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  2. Leesutthiphonchai, W.; Vu, A.L.; Ah-Fong, A.M.V.; Judelson, H.S. How Does Phytophthora infestans Evade Control Efforts? Modern Insight into the Late Blight Disease. Phytopathology 2018, 108, 916–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, W.; Jiao, F. Effectors of Phytophthora pathogens are powerful weapons for manipulating host immunity. Planta 2019, 250, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Stephan, D.; Eckhard, K. Screening of plant extracts, rnicro-organisms and commercial preparations for biocontrol of Phytophthora infestans on detached potato leaves. IOBC WPRS Bull. 2006, 25, 391–394. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fravel, D.R.; Connick, W.J.; Lewis, J.A. Formulation of Microorganisms to Control Plant Diseases. In Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides; Springer Nature: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 187–202. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stephan, D.; Schmitt, A.; Martins Carvalho, S.; Seddon, B.; Koch, E. Evaluation of biocontrol preparations and plant extracts for the control of Phytophthora infestans on potato leaves. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2005, 112, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kamoun, S.; Furzer, O.; Jones, J.D.G.; Judelson, H.S.; Ali, G.S.; Dalio, R.J.D.; Roy, S.G.; Schena, L.; Zambounis, A.; Panabières, F.; et al. The Top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 16, 413–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fry, W.E. Phytophthora infestans: New Tools (and Old Ones) Lead to New Understanding and Precision Management. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2016, 54, 529–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Quimby, P.C.; King, L.R.; Grey, W.E. Biological control as a means of enhancing the sustainability of crop/land management systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 88, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Andreu, A.B.; Guevara, M.G.; Wolski, E.A.; Daleo, G.R.; Caldiz, D.O. Enhancement of natural disease resistance in potatoes by chemicals. Pest Manag. Sci. 2006, 62, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, F.; Zhou, Q.; Qin, C.; Li, Y.; Zhan, J. Low evolutionary risk of iprovalicarb resistance in Phytophthora infestans. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2018, 152, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jindal, K.K.; Singh, H.; Meeta, M. Biological control of Phytophthora infestans on potato. Indian J. Plant Pathol. 1988, 6, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yan, Z.; Reddy, M.S.; Ryu, C.M.; McInroy, J.A.; Wilson, M.; Kloepper, J.W. Induced systemic protection against tomato late blight elicited by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 1329–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lamsal, K.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, Y.S. Biocontrol of late blight and plant growth promotion in tomato using rhizobacterial isolates. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 23, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tomar, S.; Singh, B.P.; Lal, M.; Khan, M.A.; Hussain, T.; Sharma, S.; Kaushik, S.K.; Kumar, S. Screening of novel microorganisms for biosurfactant and biocontrol activity against Phytophthora infestans. J. Environ. Biol. 2014, 35, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Cray, J.A.; Connor, M.C.; Stevenson, A.; Houghton, J.D.R.; Rangel, D.E.N.; Cooke, L.R.; Hallsworth, J.E. Biocontrol agents promote growth of potato pathogens, depending on environmental conditions. Microb. Biotechnol. 2016, 9, 330–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. De Vries, S.; von Dahlen, J.K.; Schnake, A.; Ginschel, S.; Schulz, B.; Rose, L.E. Broad-spectrum inhibition of Phytophthora infestans by fungal endophytes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 94, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ali, M.; Kim, B.; Belfield, K.D.; Norman, D.; Brennan, M.; Ali, G.S. Inhibition of Phytophthora parasitica and P. capsici by silver nanoparticles synthesized using aqueous extract of Artemisia absinthium. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Divya, K.; Smitha, V.; Jisha, M.S. Antifungal, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of chitosan nanoparticles and its use as an edible coating on vegetables. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 114, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghorbani, R.; Wilcockson, S.; Leifert, C. Alternative treatments for late blight control in organic potato: Antagonistic micro-organisms and compost extracts for activity against Phytophthora infestans. Potato Res. 2005, 48, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wianowska, D.; Garbaczewska, S.; Cieniecka-Roslonkiewicz, A.; Dawidowicz, A.L.; Jankowska, A. Comparison of antifungal activity of extracts from different Juglans regia cultivars and juglone. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 100, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cayuela, M.L.; Millner, P.D.; Meyer, S.L.F.; Roig, A. Potential of olive mill waste and compost as biobased pesticides against weeds, fungi, and nematodes. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 399, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kang, S.W.; Kim, S.W. New antifungal activity of penicillic acid against Phytophthora species. Biotechnol. Lett. 2004, 26, 695–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Son, S.W.; Kim, H.Y.; Choi, G.J.; Lim, H.K.; Jang, K.S.; Lee, S.O.; Lee, S.; Sung, N.D.; Kim, J.C. Bikaverin and fusaric acid from Fusarium oxysporum show antioomycete activity against Phytophthora infestans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 692–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, G.; Liu, Z.; Lin, R.; Li, E.; Mao, Z.; Ling, J.; Yang, Y.; Yin, W.B.; Xie, B. Biosynthesis of Antibiotic Leucinostatins in Bio-control Fungus Purpureocillium lilacinum and Their Inhibition on Phytophthora Revealed by Genome Mining. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Dahlin, P.; Müller, M.C.; Ekengren, S.; McKee, L.S.; Bulone, V. The impact of steroidal glycoalkaloids on the physiology of Phytophthora infestans, the causative agent of potato late blight. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2017, 30, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Portz, D.; Koch, E.; Slusarenko, A.J. Effects of garlic (Allium sativum) juice containing allicin on Phytophthora infestans and downy mildew of cucumber caused by Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 122, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, J.C.; Choi, G.J.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, J.S.; Chung, K.Y.; Cho, K.Y. Screening extracts of Achyranthes japonica and Rumex crispus for activity against various plant pathogenic fungi and control of powdery mildew. Pest Manag. Sci. 2004, 60, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Manter, D.K.; Kelsey, R.G.; Karchesy, J.J. Antimicrobial activity of extractable conifer heartwood compounds toward Phytophthora ramorum. J. Chem. Ecol. 2007, 33, 2133–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Halama, P.; Van Haluwin, C. Antifungal activity of lichen extracts and lichenic acids. BioControl 2004, 49, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Blaeser, P.; Steiner, U.; Lyr, H.; Russel, P.E.; Dehne, H.W.; Sisler, H.D. Antifungal activity of plant extracts against potato late blight (Phytophthora infestans). In Modern fungicides and antifungal compounds II, Proceedings of the 12th International Reinhardsbrunn Symposium, Friedrichroda, Thuringia, Germany, 24–29 May 1998; Intercept: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 491–499. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pretorius, J.C.; Zietsman, P.C.; Eksteen, D. Fungitoxic properties of selected South African plant species against plant pathogens of economic importance in agriculture. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2002, 141, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Okemo, P.O.; Bais, H.P.; Vivanco, J.M. In vitro activities of Maesa lanceolata extracts against fungal plant pathogens. Fitoterapia 2003, 74, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dales, M.J. A review of plant material used for controlling insect pests of stored products. Nat. Resour. Inst. Bull. 1996, 65, 1–91. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chaadaeva, A.V.; Tepkeeva, I.I.; Moiseeva, E.V.; Svirshchevskaya, E.V.; Demshkin, V.P. Antitumor activity of the plant remedy peptide extract pe-pm in a new mouse t-lymphoma/leukemia model. Biomeditsinskaya Khimiya 2009, 55, 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tepkeeva, I.I.; Moiseeva, E.V.; Chaadaeva, A.V.; Zhavoronkova, E.V.; Kessler, Y.V.; Semushina, S.G.; Demushkin, V.P. Evaluation of antitumor activity of peptide extracts from medicinal plants on the model of transplanted breast cancer in CBRB-Rb(8.17)1Iem mice. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 145, 464–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rakotonindraina, T.; Chauvin, J.É.; Pellé, R.; Faivre, R.; Chatot, C.; Savary, S.; Aubertot, J.N. Modeling of yield losses caused by potato late blight on eight cultivars with different levels of resistance to phytophthora infestans. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Choi, N.H.; Jang, J.Y.; Choi, G.J.; Choi, Y.H.; Jang, K.S.; Nguyen, V.T.; Min, B.S.; Le Dang, Q.; Kim, J.C. Antifungal activity of sterols and dipsacus saponins isolated from Dipsacus asper roots against phytopathogenic fungi. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2017, 141, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yoon, M.Y.; Choi, G.J.; Choi, Y.H.; Jang, K.S.; Park, M.S.; Cha, B.; Kim, J.C. Effect of polyacetylenic acids from Prunella vulgaris on various plant pathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 51, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schuster, C.; Konstantinidou-Doltsinis, S.; Schmitt, A. Glycyrrhiza glabra extract protects plants against important phytopathogenic fungi. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2010, 75, 531–540. [Google Scholar]
  41. Turóczi, B.; Bakonyi, J.; Szabó, K.A.; Bálint, J.; Máthé, I.; Lányi, S.; Balog, A. In vitro and in vivo effect of poplar bud extracts on Phytophthora infestans: A new effective biological method in potato late blight control. Plants 2020, 9, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Gao, L.; Bradeen, J.M. Contrasting Potato Foliage and Tuber Defense Mechanisms against the Late Blight Pathogen Phytophthora infestans. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Arafa, R.A.; Rakha, M.T.; Soliman, N.E.K.; Moussa, O.M.; Kamel, S.M.; Shirasawa, K. Rapid identification of candidate genes for resistance to tomato late blight disease using next-generation sequencing technologies. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ha, J.H.; Jang, H.A.; Moon, K.B.; Baek, K.H.; Choi, G.J.; Choi, D.; Cho, H.S.; Kwon, S.Y.; Jeon, J.H.; Oh, S.K.; et al. Nicotiana benthamiana Matrix Metalloprotease 1 (NMMP1) gene confers disease resistance to Phytophthora infestans in tobacco and potato plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 218, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Natarajan, B.; Kalsi, H.S.; Godbole, P.; Malankar, N.; Thiagarayaselvam, A.; Siddappa, S.; Thulasiram, H.V.; Chakrabarti, S.K.; Banerjee, A.K. MiRNA160 is associated with local defense and systemic acquired resistance against Phytophthora infestans infection in potato. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 2023–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Kumar, A.; Farooqi, M.S.; Mishra, D.C.; Kumar, S.; Rai, A.; Chaturvedi, K.K.; Lal, S.B.; Sharma, A. Prediction of miRNA and Identification of their Relationship Network Related to Late Blight Disease of Potato. MicroRNA 2017, 7, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Niderman, T.; Genetet, I.; Bruyere, T.; Gees, R.; Stintzi, A.; Legrand, M.; Fritig, B.; Mosinger, E. Pathogenesis-related PR-1 proteins are antifungal. Isolation and characterization of three 14-kilodalton proteins of tomato and of a basic PR-1 of tobacco with inhibitory activity against Phytophthora infestans. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hoegen, E.; Strömberg, A.; Pihlgren, U.; Kombrink, E. Primary structure and tissue-specific expression of the pathogenesis-related protein PR-1b in potato. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Thomas, C.; Mabon, R.; Andrivon, D.; Val, F. The effectiveness of induced defense responses in a susceptible potato genotype depends on the growth rate of Phytophthora infestans. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2019, 32, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Belbahri, L.; Calmin, G.; Mauch, F.; Andersson, J.O. Evolution of the cutinase gene family: Evidence for lateral gene transfer of a candidate Phytophthora virulence factor. Gene 2008, 408, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Fletcher, K.; Han, R.; Michelmore, R.; Yang, R. Genome-wide analysis of cyclophilin proteins in 21 oomycetes. Pathogens 2020, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Meijer, H.J.G.; Schoina, C.; Wang, S.; Bouwmeester, K.; Hua, C.; Govers, F. Phytophthora infestans small phospholipase D-like proteins elicit plant cell death and promote virulence. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Gvozdeva, E.L.; Ievleva, E.V.; Gerasimova, N.G.; Ozeretskovskaya, O.L.; Valueva, T.A. Exoproteinases of the oomycete Phytophthora infestans. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2004, 40, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Boutemy, L.S.; King, S.R.F.; Win, J.; Hughes, R.K.; Clarke, T.A.; Blumenschein, T.M.A.; Kamoun, S.; Banfield, M.J. Structures of Phytophthora RXLR effector proteins: A conserved but adaptable fold underpins functional diversity. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 35834–35842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Wawra, S.; Trusch, F.; Matena, A.; Apostolakis, K.; Linne, U.; Zhukov, I.; Stanek, J.; Koźmiński, W.; Davidson, I.; Secombes, C.J.; et al. The RxLR motif of the host targeting effector AVR3a of Phytophthora infestans is cleaved before secretion. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1184–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ŝtajner, D.; Popović, B.M.; Ĉanadanović-Brunet, J.; Anaĉkov, G. Exploring Equisetum arvense L., Equisetum ramosissimum L. and Equisetum telmateia L. as sources of natural antioxidants. Phyther. Res. 2009, 23, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Francescato, L.N.; Debenedetti, S.L.; Schwanz, T.G.; Bassani, V.L.; Henriques, A.T. Identification of phenolic compounds in Equisetum giganteum by LC-ESI-MS/MS and a new approach to total flavonoid quantification. Talanta 2013, 105, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Patova, O.A.; Smirnov, V.V.; Golovchenko, V.V.; Vityazev, F.V.; Shashkov, A.S.; Popov, S.V. Structural, rheological and antioxidant properties of pectins from Equisetum arvense L. and Equisetum sylvaticum L. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 209, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hase, T.; Wada, K.; Matsubara, H. Horsetail (Equisetum arvense) ferredoxins I and II: Amino acid sequences and gene duplication. J. Biochem. 1977, 82, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brumme, S.; Kruft, V.; Schmitz, U.K.; Braun, H.P. New insights into the co-evolution of cytochrome c reductase and the mitochondrial processing peptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 13143–13149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Al Mohammed, H.I.; Paray, B.A.; Rather, I.A. Anticancer activity of EA1 extracted from Equisetum arvense. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 30, 1947–1950. [Google Scholar]
  62. Do Monte, F.H.M.; Dos Santos, J.G.; Russi, M.; Bispo Lanziotti, V.M.N.; Moreira Leal, L.K.A.; De Andrade Cunha, G.M. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties of the hydroalcoholic extract of stems from Equisetum arvense L. in mice. Pharmacol. Res. 2004, 49, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Garcia, D.; Ramos, A.J.; Sanchis, V.; Marín, S. Equisetum arvense hydro-alcoholic extract: Phenolic composition and antifungal and antimycotoxigenic effect against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides in stored maize. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2248–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wojnicz, D.; Kucharska, A.Z.; Sokół-Łętowska, A.; Kicia, M.; Tichaczek-Goska, D. Medicinal plants extracts affect virulence factors expression and biofilm formation by the uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Urol. Res. 2012, 40, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Grégoire, C.; Rémus-Borel, W.; Vivancos, J.; Labbé, C.; Belzile, F.; Bélanger, R.R. Discovery of a multigene family of aquaporin silicon transporters in the primitive plant Equisetum arvense. Plant J. 2012, 72, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Inamine, S.; Onaga, S.; Ohnuma, T.; Fukamizo, T.; Taira, T. Purification, cDNA cloning, and characterization of LysM-containing plant chitinase from horsetail (Equisetum arvense). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2015, 79, 1296–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Karol, K.G.; Arumuganathan, K.; Boore, J.L.; Duffy, A.M.; De Everett, K.; Hall, J.D.; Hansen, S.K.; Kuehl, J.V.; Mandoli, D.F.; Mishler, B.D.; et al. Complete plastome sequences of Equisetum arvense and Isoetes flaccida: Implications for phylogeny and plastid genome evolution of early land plant lineages. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Rogozhin, E.A.; Tepkeeva, I.I.; Zaitsev, D.V.; Demushkin, V.P.; Smirnov, A.N. Biological activity of peptide extracts of medicinal plants against phytopathogenic fungi and oomycetes. Russ. Agric. Sci. 2011, 37, 314–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Odintsova, T.I.; Vassilevski, A.A.; Slavokhotova, A.A.; Musolyamov, A.K.; Finkina, E.I.; Khadeeva, N.V.; Rogozhin, E.A.; Korostyleva, T.V.; Pukhalsky, V.A.; Grishin, E.V.; et al. A novel antifungal hevein-type peptide from Triticum kiharae seeds with a unique 10-cysteine motif. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 4266–4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Odintsova, T.; Rogozhin, E.; Sklyar, I.; Musolyamov, A.; Kudryavtsev, A.; Pukhalsky, V.; Smirnov, A.; Grishin, E.; Egorov, T. Antifungal Activity of Storage 2S Albumins from Seeds of the Invasive Weed Dandelion Taraxacum officinale Wigg. Protein Pept. Lett. 2010, 17, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 09 01294 g001 550
Figure 1. The antimicrobial activity of the plant peptide extracts against Phytophthora infestans by optical microscopy: (A)—indirect germination, (B)—direct germination.
Figure 1. The antimicrobial activity of the plant peptide extracts against Phytophthora infestans by optical microscopy: (A)—indirect germination, (B)—direct germination.
Plants 09 01294 g001
Plants 09 01294 g002 550
Figure 2. Antimicrobial activity of the plant peptide extracts against P. infestans by inoculation of potato tuber slices.
Figure 2. Antimicrobial activity of the plant peptide extracts against P. infestans by inoculation of potato tuber slices.
Plants 09 01294 g002
Plants 09 01294 g003 550
Figure 3. Dynamics of late blight disease development on potato tuber discs: (A)—control since 96 h after inoculation, (B)—control since 120 h after inoculation, (C)—control since 144 h after inoculation; (D)—PE-Eqi since 96 h after inoculation, (E)—PE-Eqi since 120 h after inoculation, (F)—PE-Eqi since 144 h after inoculation.
Figure 3. Dynamics of late blight disease development on potato tuber discs: (A)—control since 96 h after inoculation, (B)—control since 120 h after inoculation, (C)—control since 144 h after inoculation; (D)—PE-Eqi since 96 h after inoculation, (E)—PE-Eqi since 120 h after inoculation, (F)—PE-Eqi since 144 h after inoculation.
Plants 09 01294 g003
Plants 09 01294 g004 550
Figure 4. MALDI-TOF MS analysis of the extract from common horsetail (E. arvense). Intens. [a.u.]—intensity of m/z signal, absorption units.
Figure 4. MALDI-TOF MS analysis of the extract from common horsetail (E. arvense). Intens. [a.u.]—intensity of m/z signal, absorption units.
Plants 09 01294 g004
Plants 09 01294 g005 550
Figure 5. Chromatographic analysis of the PE-Eqi extract: (A)—separation by anion-exchange HPLC, (B)—separation by reversed-phase HPLC.
Figure 5. Chromatographic analysis of the PE-Eqi extract: (A)—separation by anion-exchange HPLC, (B)—separation by reversed-phase HPLC.
Plants 09 01294 g005
Table
Table 1. Biological assays of peptide extracts on direct and indirect germination of Phytophthora infestans with application of microtiter-plate assay.
Table 1. Biological assays of peptide extracts on direct and indirect germination of Phytophthora infestans with application of microtiter-plate assay.
Index/VariantExtract
PE-PMPE-EqiPE-CmPE-InPE-HpPE-LnPE-Cs
Indirect germinationIC50, mg/mL0.251.0--2.0-2.0
ICmin, mg/mL0.1250.5--1.0-1.0
Direct germinationIC50, mg/mL0.52.0-1.00.5-0.5
ICmin, mg/mL0.1251.02.00.50.252.00.25
Morphological changes+------
“+”—morphological changes of zoosporangiums: partial destruction and covering lysis at level of 15–18% at concentration of 2.0 mg/mL.
Table
Table 2. A list of peptides identified in the extract from common horsetail (E. arvense).
Table 2. A list of peptides identified in the extract from common horsetail (E. arvense).
No PeakAverage Molecular Mass Measured, DaN-terminal Amino Acid SequenceAnnotation
11048.61PAVTLAFATTG11 *Aquaporin product
2905.21PSGGALNY8Unidentified protein product
31160.41PVAGEDNQFLA11 Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit fragment
4615.2No sequence determined-
5943.51DFYRDND7 Possible hypothetical chloroplast RF21 protein fragment
61378.21DLIRDDFIEKD11 Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit fragment
71471.81QYQLDGIDLDYE12Chitinase A fragment
81010.11DFTRDDEN8Possible ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit fragment
9722.8No sequence determined-
* A number of amino acid residues in N-terminal sequences is marked by superscript.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rogozhin, E.A.; Vasilchenko, A.S.; Barashkova, A.S.; Smirnov, A.N.; Zavriev, S.K.; Demushkin, V.P. Peptide Extracts from Seven Medicinal Plants Discovered to Inhibit Oomycete Phytophthora infestans, a Causative Agent of Potato Late Blight Disease. Plants 2020, 9, 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101294

AMA Style

Rogozhin EA, Vasilchenko AS, Barashkova AS, Smirnov AN, Zavriev SK, Demushkin VP. Peptide Extracts from Seven Medicinal Plants Discovered to Inhibit Oomycete Phytophthora infestans, a Causative Agent of Potato Late Blight Disease. Plants. 2020; 9(10):1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101294

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rogozhin, Eugene A., Alexey S. Vasilchenko, Anna S. Barashkova, Alexey N. Smirnov, Sergey K. Zavriev, and Vladimir P. Demushkin. 2020. "Peptide Extracts from Seven Medicinal Plants Discovered to Inhibit Oomycete Phytophthora infestans, a Causative Agent of Potato Late Blight Disease" Plants 9, no. 10: 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101294

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop