Next Article in Journal
Physiological Effects of Exogenously Applied Reflectants and Anti-Transpirants on Leaf Temperature and Fruit Sunburn in Citrus
Previous Article in Journal
New Insights on Lilium Phylogeny Based on a Comparative Phylogenomic Study Using Complete Plastome Sequences
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/plants8120548
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chromatographic Fingerprinting of the Old World Lupins Seed Alkaloids: A Supplemental Tool in Species Discrimination

by
Wojciech Święcicki
1,
Katarzyna Czepiel
1,
Paulina Wilczura
1,
Paweł Barzyk
2,
Zygmunt Kaczmarek
3 and
Magdalena Kroc
1,*
1
Department of Genomics, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479 Poznan, Poland
2
Poznan Plant Breeders Ltd., Wiatrowo Plant Breeding Branch, 62-100 Wengrowitz, Poland
3
Department of Biometry and Bioinformatics, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2019, 8(12), 548; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120548
Submission received: 14 October 2019 / Revised: 20 November 2019 / Accepted: 25 November 2019 / Published: 27 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The total contents and qualitative compositions of alkaloids in seeds of 10 Old World lupin species (73 accessions) were surveyed using gas chromatography. The obtained results, combined with those for three lupin crops, Lupinus angustifolius, Lupinus albus, and Lupinus luteus, provide the most complete and up-to-date overview of alkaloid profiles of 13 lupin species originating from the Mediterranean Basin. The qualitative alkaloid compositions served as useful supplementary tools of species discrimination. On the basis of the most abundant major alkaloids, lupanine, lupinine, and multiflorine, the Old World lupin species were divided into four groups. Those containing lupanine (L. angustifolius, L. albus, and Lupinus mariae-josephi), containing lupinine (Lupinus luteus, Lupinus hispanicus, and Lupinus × hispanicoluteus), containing lupinine and multiflorine (Lupinus atlanticus, Lupinus palaestinus, Lupinus anatolicus, Lupinus digitatus, Lupinus pilosus, and Lupinus cosentinii), and containing multiflorine (Lupinus micranthus). Within a given group, certain species can be, in most cases, further distinguished by the presence of other major alkaloids. The discrimination of species based on the total alkaloid content was found to be less reliable because of the significant intra-species variations, as well as the influences of environmental factors on the seed alkaloid content.

1. Introduction

The genus Lupinus consists of two geographically isolated groups of species: the Old World lupins (OWL) and the New World lupins [1]. A majority of the species within the genus belong to the New World group, which is distributed in both North and South America [2,3]. In the Mediterranean Basin and North Africa, 12 OWL species have been described, including three lupin crops, Lupinus albus L., Lupinus angustifolius L., and Lupinus luteus L. [4]. Subsequently, a Latin diagnosis of three new OWL species, Lupinus anatolicus Swiec. et Swiec. [5], the interspecific hybrid Lupinus × hispanicoluteus Swiec. et Swiec. [6], and Lupinus mariae-josephi H. Pascual [7], was presented.
Two sections related to seed coat texture have been distinguished among the OWL: the smooth-seeded species (section Malacospermae: L. albus L., L. angustifolius L., L. × hispanicoluteus Swiec. et Swiec, Lupinus hispanicus Boiss. & Reut., L. luteus L., and Lupinus micranthus Guss.) and the rough-seeded species (section Scabrispermae: Lupinus atlanticus Glads., Lupinus cosentinii Guss., Lupinus digitatus Forsk., Lupinus palaestinus Boiss., Lupinus pilosus Murr., Lupinus princei Harms, and Lupinus somaliensis Baker) [4]. The rough-seeded lupins are similar in terms of their morphological, chemical, and cytological features, and their genetic relationships were confirmed by successful crosses [2,4,8,9,10,11]. Despite their variable genome sizes and chromosomal numbers, the rough-seeded lupins form a strongly supported monophyletic group in phylogenetic analyses [2,12]. The smooth-seeded lupins form a heterogeneous group of species separated by major genetic barriers [1,13]. Two OWL species do not fit into this division scheme. L. anatolicus Swiec. et Swiec was initially characterized as a smooth-seeded species [5,14], but, based on further studies, was assigned to the Scabrispermae section [2]. L. mariae-josephi H. Pascual forms a distinct line in the phylogenetic analysis, with the seed coat texture being intermediate between that of the smooth- and rough-seeded lupins [15].
Lupins used in farming systems provide undeniable benefits related to their ability of symbiotic nitrogen fixation, their rotational benefits to succeeding crops, as well as their adaptation to poor soils and lower demands on the soil when compared with other crop species [16]. Nevertheless, the commercial values of lupins are primarily based on their production of seeds, which are used as fodder and food, being a good source of protein, dietary fiber, and oil [16]. One of the antinutritional factors of lupins is their alkaloids, which are synthesized in the aerial parts of the plants and accumulate in their seeds [17]. Lupin alkaloids are important secondary metabolites that play roles as defense or signal compounds, but at the same time, show neurotoxic effects on humans and animals [18]. Consequently, a limit of 0.02% of the seed dry weight has been assessed as a safe alkaloid content when used for food and feeding purposes [19]. Owing to the intensive breeding efforts, the seed alkaloid contents of modern lupin cultivars are often clearly lower than the accepted industry threshold [20,21].
Plants of the genus Lupinus contain lysine-derived quinolizidine alkaloids (QAs) (Figure 1A), but they can also contain bipiperidine alkaloids (e.g., ammodendrine) [22] (Figure 1A), and tryptophan-derived, simple indole alkaloids (e.g., gramine) [23] (Figure 1B). Most lupin species possess particular alkaloid profiles in which major alkaloids (relative abundance > 1% of the total alkaloid content) and minor alkaloids (relative abundance < 1% of the total alkaloid content) can be distinguished, providing so-called alkaloid fingerprints [18,22].
The alkaloid biosynthetic pathway of the lupins has not yet been fully characterized [17] (Figure 1). The best-studied pathway at the genetic level is QA biosynthesis in narrow-leafed lupin and other crop species [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. For further lupin breeding, which includes the domestication of new species, it is important to unravel alkaloid biosynthesis and to valorize lupin genetic resources [34,35,36]. The total contents and the relative abundances of individual QAs in the seeds of L. angustifolius (329 accessions) and L. albus (367 accessions) collected in the Polish Lupinus Genebank were explored, with consideration for the classes of origin, in our previous reports [20,21]. The aim of the present study was to explore the alkaloid profiles in the seeds of the remaining OWL species. The chromatographic fingerprints of the OWL alkaloids were evaluated based on their potential use in species discrimination.

2. Results

Alkaloid profiles for the seeds of 10 OWL species, encompassing 73 accessions, were investigated. The detailed results of the total contents and relative abundances of individual alkaloids in the assessed species are presented in Table S1, while the mean values of the major alkaloids (relative abundance > 1% of the total alkaloid content, in at least one individual per species) for each OWL are summarized in Table 1. The results obtained for the three lupin crops (L. angustifolius, L. albus, and L. luteus) were included in both overviews for comparative purposes. In the 13 OWL species, 20 alkaloids were detected, with 19 being major alkaloids (Table 1, Table S1).

2.1. OWL Qualitative Alkaloid Composition

For the individual species, 2–14 alkaloids were identified (excluding residual alkaloids of relative abundance < 0.1% of the total alkaloid content) (Table S1). When only major alkaloids were considered, two to nine alkaloids per species were detected (Table 1). In certain cases, however, particular major alkaloids were not detected at all, or their relative abundances were < 1% of the total alkaloids in some individuals within a species (Table 1, Table S1). Such situations, however, did not involve alkaloids having the greatest relative abundances within a species.
Lupinine was the most frequently occurring major alkaloid in the OWL (detected in 10 species and assessed as a major alkaloid in 9 species) (Figure 2, Table 1, Table S1). In contrast, in the remaining four species, lupinine could not be detected (L. angustifolius, L. albus, and L. mariae-josephi) or was assessed as a minor alkaloid (relative abundance < 1% of the total alkaloid content; L. micranthus). Therefore, two groups of species might be determined in OWL, those containing and those lacking lupinine as a major alkaloid. The group of nine species having lupinine as a characteristic alkaloid (Table 1) could be broadened to include L. princei because, according to Wink et al. [22], this species contains epilupinine, which is a lupinine epimer (Figure 1A) [17].
Among the four species in which lupinine was not a major alkaloid, L. angustifolius, L. albus, and L. mariae-josephi contained lupanine as their most abundant alkaloid, and L. micranthus contained multiflorine as its most abundant alkaloid (Table 1).
For alkaloids with the greatest relative abundances within a species, lupanine and multiflorine were the next most commonly occurring after lupinine (Table 1). Lupanine was present in nine species (Figure 2, Table S1), although its relative abundance exceeded 1% of the total alkaloid content in only four species (Table 1). Multiflorine was detected in eight species, and it was a major alkaloid in all of them (Figure 2, Table 1, Table S1).
Using the observed alkaloid ratios of the three most abundant alkaloids, lupinine, lupanine, and multiflorine, we distinguished four groups of OWL. Thus, specific alkaloid compositions could serve as the bases for further species differentiation within a group. Moreover, consistent relative abundance levels of major alkaloids were observed for seed samples obtained from different sources (genebanks/environments), which further strengthened the potential to discriminate species based on their qualitative alkaloid profiles. The four groups of OWLs are described in the subsections below (Section 2.1.1, Section 2.1.2, Section 2.1.3 and Section 2.1.4).

2.1.1. Species Possessing Lupanine as the Most Abundant Major Alkaloid

Three OWL species included in this group were characterized by the lack of lupinine in addition to the outstanding amounts of lupanine (Figure 2A, Table 1, Table S1). Their further indicative features are as follows:
  • L. albus and L. angustifolius, contained two other alkaloids in common, 13-hydroxylupanine and angustifoline. Both species could be distinguished using albine, ammodendrine, and multiflorine (and its derivatives), which were present in L. albus only, while L. angustifolius contained isolupanine as well as greater proportions of 13-hydroxylupanine and angustifoline.
  • In L. mariae-josephi, lupanine and its derivatives were predominant. Albine and ammodendrine were not detected, while angustifoline and multiflorine were not major alkaloids for this species.

2.1.2. Species Possessing Lupinine as the Most Abundant Major Alkaloid

Three OWL species classified into this group were also characterized by the lack of multiflorine and lupanine (Figure 2B, Table 1, Table S1). Individual species could be distinguished as follows:
  • L. luteus contained sparteine as an additional, major alkaloid, and the sparteine content was greatest in this species compared with all the other OWLs. Moreover, ammodendrine is present.
  • In both the subspecies of L. hispanicus, lupinine is predominant (~97%). L. hispanicus subsp. hispanicus was characterized as having gramine as the second major alkaloid, while for L. hispanicus subsp. bicolor, gramine was the major alkaloid in only one accession.
  • L. × hispanicoluteus had a lupinine content that ranged from 28% to 99%, and gramine comprised 0.5–62% of the total alkaloid content. Moreover, sparteine, as well as ammodendrine and its derivatives, were also occasionally detected. In comparison, in the L. luteus parental lines (Wt96839, Wt98066, and Wt98067), lupinine (58–74%), sparteine (22–41%), ammodendrine (~0.5–2%), and sometimes gramine, were detected, while the L. hispanicus parental line (Wt96383) was distinguished by greater proportions of lupinine (>90%) and gramine as the major alkaloids. Because of recombined arrangements of parental alleles in each of the analyzed L. × hispanicoluteus accession, they may be considered as a separate genotype [6]. The resulting diverse alkaloid compositions make the identification of this hybrid species, although possible, more difficult than those of other OWLs.

2.1.3. Species Possessing Lupinine and Multiflorine as the Two Major Alkaloids with the Greatest Relative Abundances

Six OWL species included in this group had different lupinine/multiflorine ratios (Figure 2B,C, Table 1, Table S1). Another common feature within the group was the lack of lupanine as a major alkaloid. The following factors were characteristic of individual species:
Species with a Greater Relative Abundance of Lupinine than Multiflorine.
  • In L. atlanticus, the most distinguishing feature was the 2:1 ratio of the relative abundance of lupinine to multiflorine. In addition to the multiflorine derivatives detected in certain accessions, no other major alkaloids were detected within this species.
Species with a Greater Relative Abundance of Multiflorine than Lupinine.
  • L. palaestinus was characterized as having the greatest proportions of ammodendrine and sparteine within the group. The relative abundance of ammodendrine was also the highest among the entire OWL group.
  • L. anatolicus was unique, with its multiflorine content being the greatest among the group members and eight times greater than its lupinine content. Moreover, no additional major alkaloids were detected.
  • L. digitatus, like L. anatolicus, did not have additional major alkaloids, but the ratio of lupinine to multiflorine was close to 1:2.
  • The L. cosentinii and L. pilosus alkaloid profiles were considerably similar, with lupinine to multiflorine ratios of ~1:2. L. cosentinii could be distinguished by the lack of sparteine, while this alkaloid was present in certain L. pilosus accessions.

2.1.4. Species Possessing Multiflorine as the Most Abundant Major Alkaloid

  • L. micranthus has a distinct alkaloid composition, with dominating relative abundances of multiflorine and its derivatives (Figure 2C, Table 1, Table S1). Lupanine and angustifoline were also detected in all the accessions, although, in certain cases, they did not exceed 1% of the total alkaloid content. Nonetheless, the relative abundance of angustifoline in L. micranthus was the second greatest compared with the other OWLs. Additionally, in particular accessions, albine could be detected. Other than in this species, it was only found in L. albus.
A principal component analysis (PCA) carried out for 13 OWL species (including two L. hispanicus subspecies) with regards to the relative abundances of 20 alkaloids detected showed distinctions among three species, L. albus, L. angustifolius, and L. mariae-josephi, while the remaining species clustered together (Figure S1). To better reveal the relationships between the OWL species and to increase graphic resolution, in the two subsequent rounds of PCA the dataset was restricted to the six most distinguishing alkaloids (lupanine, lupinine, multiflorine, sparteine, gramine, and 13-angelolyoxomultiflorine) (Figure S2), and the most abundant alkaloids (lupinine, lupanine, and multiflorine) (Figure 3), respectively. These results showed again that the qualitative alkaloids compositions of L. albus, L. angustifolius, and L. mariae-josephi were clearly different than those of the remaining species. Moreover, the clustering of the species with the highest relative abundance of lupinine and multiflorine was also observed, as presented in Section 2.1.2, Section 2.1.3 and Section 2.1.4 (Figure 3, Figure S2).

2.2. OWL Total Alkaloid Contents

2.2.1. Intraspecies Variation

A statistical comparison of the intraspecies variability among total seed alkaloid contents could be assessed for six species (including two L. hispanicus subspecies) that had at least four available accessions (Table 2). Among them, statistical differences (at the 0.01 significance level) were observed in all the species, except L. cosentinii and L. hispanicus subsp. bicolor. Moreover, significant differences in the total alkaloid contents of their seeds were also observed when comparing the same species retrieved from different genebanks (environments) (Tables S2 and S3). For the majority of the compared species, the environment had significant, varied impacts on the total alkaloid content of their seeds.

2.2.2. Attempts of Interspecies Analyses

An analysis of variance applied to nine species collected from the Polish Lupinus Genebank showed significant differences among species based on their total seed alkaloid contents (Fcalc. = 53.75 > F0.01 = 2.63). To further examine the differences among species, their division into homogenous groups was tested. The investigated OWLs could be statistically divided into three homogenous groups (1, high total alkaloid content; 2, medium content; and 3, low content) (Table 3). L. mariae-josephi was distinct from the other species involved in the analysis, having the greatest alkaloid content and being the only member of the first group. The second and the third alkaloid groups consisted of species classically categorized as smooth- and rough-seeded lupins, respectively. No clear correlations between homogenous groups and their representatives’ origins or occurrences, as described by Gladstones [4], were observed.

3. Discussion

Lupin alkaloid profiles have been previously examined; however, OWL species were either not the main research focus, the survey was dedicated to a limited number of OWL species, or it was restricted to one accession per species [5,22,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Here, we presented a joint evaluation of the alkaloid profiles in the seeds of 13 OWL species, encompassing the recently discovered L. anatolicus, L. mariae-josephi, and L. × hispanicoluteus, and in most cases, incorporating several accessions within the species. The aim of our research was to provide a comprehensive assessment of similarities and differences on the basis of alkaloid fingerprints of all OWL species, and with particular attention not only to alkaloid occurrences but also the proportions of the relative abundances of the individual alkaloids. Our study updates and expands the previous analysis of Wink et al. [22], which covered 11 OWL species (including the no longer available L. princei), represented by one accession per species. In the 13 analyzed OWL species, we detected 20 alkaloids, and identified 19 as being major alkaloids (Table 1, Table S1), while previously, 14 major alkaloids had been identified in the OWLs [22].
The summary of the major alkaloids detected in the 13 OWLs (Table 1) provides the qualitative alkaloid composition of a given species, showing the distinctive alkaloids that each might possess. The analysis of the qualitative alkaloid compositions among the OWL species showed that certain subgroups might be distinguished based on common patterns among the major alkaloid profiles. Furthermore, in many cases, individual major alkaloids might serve as additional factors of species discrimination within these subgroups. Consistent results for the relative abundances of major alkaloids were also achieved for seed samples of the same OWL species retrieved from different genebanks (environments), which confirmed the potential ability to discriminate among species based on their seeds’ qualitative alkaloid profiles. From the perspective of the seed coat texture categories, we observed that the rough-seeded species formed a more homogenous group, while the smooth-seeded lupins had considerably diverse qualitative alkaloid compositions. It is noteworthy that for three species, only a limited number of their representatives have been analyzed (L. digitatus—one accession, L. anatolicus—one accession, L. mariae-josephi—2 two accessions) and additional accessions would strengthen the final conclusions. No additional genetic resources are at present available worldwide for these OWL species however, our results on alkaloid patterns are in line with those reported by other authors [5,14,38,42]. The closer relationships among rough-seeded species are in accordance with the findings of previous analyses based on seed globulin profiles, isozymes, and phylogenies incorporating internal transcribed spacer sequences [2,9,11]. Such differences might be triggered by adaptations to environmental changes in the Mediterranean region and northern Africa during evolution [2].
An overview of the OWL subgroups that was distinguished based on quantitative alkaloid profiles in seeds versus putative lupin alkaloid biosynthetic pathways (Figure 1, Table 1) showed that the key step is the transformation of the Schiff’s base, which crucially impacted the major alkaloids created. This process might give rise to bicyclic lupinine, tetracyclic lupanine, multiflorine, and sparteine, or combinations. Other QAs appear to be formed by further conversions at later stages, except piperidine and indole alkaloids, which are created separately. The relative abundance levels of three major alkaloids, lupinine, lupanine, and multiflorine, were useful in the discrimination of OWL subgroups having similar alkaloid patterns. Relative proportions of these alkaloids differed among species, but remarkably when lupinine was a major alkaloid, lupanine was not. At the same time, parallel occurrences of lupinine and multiflorine were observed in some species, while in L. micranthus multiflorine predominated. The conversion leading to sparteine formation was less prevalent in OWLs, with sparteine being a major alkaloid in only a few species. In further investigations aimed at unraveling lupin alkaloid biosynthesis, understanding the Schiff’s base general background, as well as the fundamentals of its conversion into the four, mentioned major alkaloids, will be important.
Because the seed alkaloid content, beyond the genetic background, is strongly influenced by environmental factors, such as drought, temperature, fertilization, and/or soil pH [43,44,45,46], the statistical analyses concerning the total alkaloid contents were carried out using accessions gathered in the Polish Lupinus Genebank that originated from one field experiment. However, this collection did not include the rough-seeded L. digitatus or two no longer available species, L. princei and L. somaliensis. The observed significant intra-species variation of the quantitative alkaloid content revealed that the alkaloid content is not a fixed value within a species and, therefore, may not be a reliable parameter for species discrimination (Table 2). This was further confirmed by comparing results obtained for a single species from different environments, which demonstrated the significant influence of environmental factors on the total alkaloid content (Table S3). Large interindividual variability in the seed alkaloid content was also observed in previously investigated lupin crop species [20,21].
Regardless of the intra-species variation, we investigated the variation among the species and the possibility of dividing them into homogenous groups based on their total alkaloid contents (Table 3). This analysis revealed the distinctiveness of L. mariae-josephi, which was different from the other OWL species, having the greatest alkaloid content and being the only member of the first homogenous group. This species was previously identified as a diverse line within the OWL phylogeny, without a clear affinity to either the smooth- or rough-seeded group [15]. In the second and third homogenous groups, we further observed statistical differences among species classically categorized as smooth- and rough-seeded lupins, respectively. The group characterized by the lowest alkaloid content consisted of the wild, rough-seeded species. In contrast, L. hispanicus, which belongs to the secondary gene pool of cultivated L. luteus, and L. × hispanicoluteus (L. hispanicus × L. luteus hybrid) [6,47], were assigned to the medium alkaloid content group. The observed division based on the total alkaloid content was more or less in line with OWL classifications based on seed coat texture. These results, together with the greater total alkaloid content in the smooth-seeded lupins over the rough-seeded lupins, were rather surprising and have not been reported previously. From an evolutionary point of view, wild accessions would be expected to exhibit primitive features, such as a rough seed coat and a high alkaloid content. Interestingly, similar results were found in Pisum, in which primitive taxa had the lowest oligosaccharide contents [48]. Because certain species were not present or were represented by single accessions, these results need further support. However, the major constraint is again the limited genetic resources for wild OWL species available worldwide.
Several other observations based on the presented OWLs qualitative and quantitative alkaloid patterns are noteworthy. The interspecies analysis based on the total alkaloid content showed that L. anatolicus [5] was not statistically different from L. pilosus or L. palaestinus (Table 3), but differed from L. micranthus, to which it was initially considered phenotypically similar [5]. These results corroborated those of Aïnouche and Bayer [37] and Aïnouche et al. [2], which described L. anatolicus as being related to the Pilosus-Palaestinus subclade of Scabrispermae. Nonetheless, PCA results showed that the distance of L. anatolicus to four rough-seeded species, L. pilosus, L. palaestinus, L. cosentinii, and L. digitatus, is more or less the same as to L. micranthus (Figure 3, Figure S2). L. micranthus was found to exhibit a distinctive alkaloid profile compared with those of other OWLs having multiflorine and its derivatives, as well as albine and angustifoline, as the most abundant seed alkaloids. A similar pattern of seed alkaloids has also been reported by Muzquiz et al. [42]. The distinctiveness of L. micranthus was also observed based on its position in the phylogenetic tree [12], seed proteomic data [49], nuclear DNA content [8] and karyotype analysis [50], as well flavonoid [51] and isozyme contents [11], and consequently, an intermediate position between smooth- and rough-seeded lupins has been proposed. The presented PCA (Figure 3, Figure S2) indicated that L. micranthus’ qualitative alkaloid content was considerably different than those of other smooth-seeded lupins and more similar to rough-seeded species.
Legumes’ secondary metabolites, including quinolizidine alkaloids, have been previously assessed as chemotaxonomic markers [12,52]. When the presence/absence of individual quinolizidine alkaloids has been investigated within the Lupinus genus, their systematic values were limited. For example, bicyclic lupinine could be detected in the rough-seeded lupins, certain smooth-seeded species (i.e., L. luteus) and some North and South American species [12,22]. Similarly, a comparison of molecular phylogeny with the occurrences of quinolizidine alkaloids within the Papilionoideae subfamily showed that, in some cases, not all members of a monophyletic taxon share a chemical characteristic (i.e., tribe Crotalaria had pyrrolizidine instead of quinolizidine alkaloids) [12]. Nonetheless, it is undeniable that phytochemical studies significantly contribute to understanding the diversity in plants, by providing useful information regarding similarities and differences between and within species. The groups distinguished within the current investigation based on seed alkaloid profiles at least partially reflect currently accepted phylogenetic relationships among OWLs [2,12] and could be a useful supplemental tool in OWL species discrimination.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

In total, 10 OWL species, L. atlanticus (11 accessions), L. anatolicus (1 accession), L. cosentinii (8 accessions), L. hispanicus subsp. hispanicus (13 accessions), and L. hispanicus subsp. bicolor (5 accessions), L. micranthus (8 accessions), L. palaestinus (6 accessions), L. pilosus (11 accessions), L. digitatus (1 accession), L. mariae-josephi (2 accessions), and the interspecific hybrid L. × hispanicoluteus (7 accessions) were considered in the analyses. The L. × hispanicoluteus parental lines, L. hispanicus subsp. hispanicus (Wt96383) and L. luteus (high alkaloid Wt96839 and low alkaloids Wt98066 and Wt98067), were investigated for comparative purposes (Table S1).
The seeds were retrieved mainly from the Polish Lupinus Genebank collection (Wiatrowo); however, for the species represented by limited resources, additional records were requested from the following other sources: The United States Department of Agriculture’s National Plant Germplasm System (Pullman, WA, USA), Genebank of the Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (Gatersleben, Germany), and Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (Madrid, Spain). As precise information on the accessions’ collection sites are rarely specified in such databases, the geographical distribution covered by the incorporated materials was difficult to determine. Additional records were therefore gathered to obtain a total of at least five accessions per species (where possible). L. anatolicus and L. digitatus were each represented by one accession only in the world’s Lupinus germplasm resources, while L. mariae-josephi was represented by only two accessions. Two other species, L. princei and L. somaliensis, appeared to be no longer accessible in the Lupinus germplasm resources. The detailed list of OWL seed samples incorporated in this study, including their source(s), is presented as Table S2. The alkaloid profiles for the 10 species (73 accessions) considered in this study were combined with those of the three lupin crops, resulting in 13 evaluated OWLs. For L. angustifolius and L. albus, the average values of the total contents and the relative abundances of individual alkaloids were calculated from the results of earlier works [20,21]. For L. luteus, the average values of 20 representative accessions were estimated, because the alkaloid profiles of the entire Polish collection are not yet available.
The seeds of the accessions originating from the Polish Lupinus Genebank collection were grown in a field experiment in Wiatrowo, Poland, using a completely randomized design with two replicates (plot size of 1 m2 with 60 seeds per plot) in 2017. The seed samples were harvested after full maturity, and the representative samples used for further analyses contained 10 g of the milled seeds.

4.2. Extraction Method and Assessments of the Total Contents and Relative Abundances of Alkaloids in OWL Seeds

The seed samples were ground to a fine meal and dried overnight at 65 °C. For each accession, two technical replications, 0.5 g each, were prepared. To each 0.5 g sample, 5 mL of 5% trichloroacetic acid was added, and the sample was homogenized at room temperature for 15 min, followed by centrifugation at 5,600 × g for 10 min at 5 °C. The supernatant was decanted, and the above homogenization and centrifugation steps were repeated twice. A 15 mL aliquot of the supernatant was subsequently alkalized with 1 mL of 10 M sodium hydroxide and extracted three times with 15 mL of dichloromethane. The organic extracts were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and decanted into a new flask. Next, 20 µL of the internal standard (1 mg/mL caffeine solution) was added to the organic extract, and the solvent was vacuum dried. The residues were reconstituted in 300 µL of dichloromethane. The characterization of alkaloids was carried out using gas chromatography, GC-2014 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) operating with an FID detector with a sensitivity of 2 mV at 300 °C. A ZB-5 silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 µm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was used. The injector temperature was 250 °C with the normal injection mode. The initial oven temperature of 180 °C was maintained for 2 min. The temperature was then increased by 5 °C/min up to 300 °C and held for 10 min at 300 °C. The flow rate of the carrier gas helium was 1 mL/min, with a split ratio of 1:20. Alkaloid identification was performed by comparing the retention times of alkaloid standards obtained from the Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland. Representative chromatograms for 13 OWL species were presented as Figure S3. A quantitative analysis was carried out using a linear calibration curve made for lupanine using caffeine as internal standard (calibration equation y = 0.0092x – 0.0043, R2 = 1; where x = the ratio of peak areas of all alkaloids detected vs. peak area of caffeine and y = alkaloid content [mg]). The total alkaloid content was assessed as the percentage of the sum of the alkaloids expressed in the seed dry weight (% of seed dry weight). The relative abundance of an alkaloid was assessed as the percentage of the total alkaloid content (sum of all alkaloids = 100%). Subsequently, the major alkaloids were estimated for each species (relative abundance > 1% of the total alkaloid content, detected in at least one accession). The reproducibility of the methods used for alkaloid extraction and measurement was tested by comparing the results obtained for the same seed samples that were analyzed in two different laboratories. Moreover, the stability of the results was periodically monitored by repeated analyses of already characterized samples over specific time intervals.

4.3. Analyses of OWL Species Variability in Terms of Seed Alkaloid Content and Composition

All 13 OWL species, encompassing 73 accessions, were incorporated into the analyses of the qualitative alkaloid profiles. Statistical analyses of the results related to the total alkaloid content in seeds were conducted. Owing to the influence of environmental factors on lupin alkaloid contents, only accessions derived from the Polish Lupinus Genebank collection (10 OWL species, 49 accessions) as originating from one filed experiment, were included in the statistical analyses (Table S1). The three lupin crops were not included in the statistical analyses because their alkaloid contents were analyzed in other experiments [20,21].

4.4. Statistical Analyses

For species having relatively large numbers of analyzed accessions (4–13), the statistical characteristics (measures of location and dispersion) were additionally calculated, and analyses of variance (F-statistics values) were performed to investigate differences between accessions within individual species [53]. The analyses of variance in the completely randomized design with unequal numbers of replications were also used to investigate the substantial differences across the same species derived from different genebanks/environments [53]. To test the homogeneity of the groups contained in the sets of OWL species considered in the analysis of variance, the Gabriel procedure was used [54]. The grouping procedure was stopped when the within-groups’ sum of squares became lower than the critical value for the overall F-test in the analysis of variance. This resulted in three homogenous groups of species.
To graphically present the results of the seed alkaloids compositions of the 13 OWL species (including two L. hispanicus subspecies) three rounds of PCA were performed [53,55]. In the first round, data on 20 detected alkaloids were incorporated. In the second round, a set of six correlated and the most differentiating alkaloids were replaced with two new, uncorrelated variables. In the third round, data on the three most abundant alkaloids were used. In all cases, the transformation into two-dimensional space did not result in a significant loss of information (less than 10%).

5. Conclusions

This study provides the most complete and up-to-date overview of the alkaloid profiles observed in the seeds of lupin species originating from the Mediterranean Basin. Our findings increase the current phytochemical knowledge of OWL species by providing new insights into their diversity as well as constituting another step towards the valorization of OWL genetic resources. We also demonstrated that patterns in qualitative alkaloid composition-based profiles may serve as supplemental tools in species discrimination within OWLs.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/8/12/548/s1, Table S1: Detailed results of the total contents and qualitative compositions of alkaloids in the 13 Old World lupin species, Table S2: List of OWL seed samples, and their sources, used in this study, Table S3: Statistical comparison of differences between the means of the seeds’ total alkaloid content (percentage of the seed dry weight) for species derived from different genebanks (environments), Figure S1: Principal component analysis (PCA) of 13 Old World lupin species characterized by 20 alkaloids with PC1 and PC2 explaining 99.01% variance. Original data were expressed in relative abundance (%) before the PCA, Figure S2: Principal component analysis (PCA) of 13 Old World lupin species characterized by the six most differentiating alkaloids (lupanine, lupinine, multiflorine, sparteine, gramine, and 13-angelolyoxomultiflorine). PC1 and PC2 components explained a combined 90.16% of the variance. Original data were expressed in relative abundance (%) before the PCA, Figure S3: Representative chromatograms showing GC separation of the alkaloids from the Old World lupin species. Here the x-axis shows the retention time (min), while the y-axis represents signal intensity (pA).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Ś. and M.K.; investigation, P.W., M.K., K.C., and Z.K.; resources, P.B., W.Ś., and M.K; writing—original draft preparation, M.K. and W.Ś.; writing—review and editing, M.K., K.C., P.W., Z.K., P.B., and W.Ś.; visualization, K.C., P.W., and M.K.; funding acquisition, W.Ś. All authors reviewed and approved the final submission.

Funding

This research was funded by the Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development within the Multiannual Programmes (RM-111-222-15 and RM 104/215).

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the Polish Lupinus Genebank (Wiatrowo), the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Plant Germplasm System (Pullman, WA, USA) and the genebank of the Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (Gatersleben, Germany) for providing seed samples for the analyses. We would also like to express our gratitude to Banco de Germoplasma del Centro para la Investigación y Experimentación Forestal-Servicio de Vida Silvestre de la Generalitat Valenciana and Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria) for providing L. mariae-josephi seeds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cowling, W.A.; Buirchell, B.J.; Tapia, M.E. Lupine Lupinus L. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops 23; International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR): Rome, Italy, 1998; p. 105. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aïnouche, A.; Bayer, R.J.; Misset, M.T. Molecular phylogeny, diversification and character evolution in Lupinus (Fabaceae) with special attention to Mediterranean and African lupines. Plant Syst. Evol. 2004, 246, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Drummond, C.S. Diversification of Lupinus (L.) in the western New World: Derived evolution of perennial life history and colonization of montane habitats. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2008, 48, 408–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gladstones, J.S. Lupins of the Mediterranean Region and Africa; Department of Agriculture of Western Australia: South Perth, WA, Australia, 1974; Volume 26, p. 48.
  5. Święcicki, W.; Święcicki, W.K.; Wolko, B. Lupinus anatolicus—A new lupin species of the Old World. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 1996, 43, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Święcicki, W.; Święcicki, W.K.; Nijaki, T. Lupinus xhispanicoluteus—An interspecific hybrid of Old World lupins. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 1999, 68, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pascual, H. Lupinus mariae-josephi (Fabaceae), nueva y sopredente especie descubierta en Espana [Lupinus mariae-josephi (Fabaceae), new and surprising species discovered in Spain]. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 2004, 61, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Naganowska, B.; Wolko, B.; Sliwinska, E.; Kaczmarek, Z. Nuclear DNA content variation and species relationships in the genus Lupinus (Fabaceae). Ann. Bot. 2003, 92, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Przybylska, J.; Zimniak-Przybylska, Z. Electrophoretic patterns of seed globulins in the Old-World Lupinus species. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 1995, 42, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gupta, S.; Buirchell, B.J.; Cowling, W.A. Interspecific reproductive barriers and genomic similarity among the rough-seeded Lupinus species. Plant Breed. 1996, 115, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wolko, B.; Weeden, N.F. Relationships among lupin species as reflected by isozyme phenotype. Genetica Pol. 1990, 31, 189–197. [Google Scholar]
  12. Käss, E.; Wink, M. Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography of Lupinus (L.) inferred from nucleotide sequences of therbcL gene and ITS 1 + 2 regions of rDNA. Plant Syst. Evol. 1997, 208, 139–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Plitmann, U.; Pazy, B. Cytogeographical distribution of old world Lupinus. Webbia 1984, 38, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Święcicki, W.K.; Wolko, B.; Naganowska, B. Lupinus anatolicus and L. xhispanicoluteus-morphological, biochemical and cytological characterization. In Proceedings of the XVI EUCARPIA Genetic Resources Section Workshop. Broad Variation and Precise Characterization-Limitation for the Future, Poznań, Poland, 16–20 May 2001; pp. 281–284. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mahé, F.; Pascual, H.; Coriton, O.; Huteau, V.; Navarro Perris, A.; Misset, M.-T.; Aïnouche, A. New data and phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic Old World lupin: Lupinus mariae-josephi H. Pascual. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2011, 58, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abraham, E.M.; Ganopoulos, I.; Madesis, P.; Mavromatis, A.; Mylona, P.; Nianiou-Obeidat, I.; Parissi, Z.; Polidoros, A.; Tani, E.; Vlachostergios, D. The use of lupin as a source of protein in animal feeding: Genomic tools and breeding approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bunsupa, S.; Yamazaki, M.; Saito, K. Quinolizidine alkaloid biosynthesis: Recent advances and future prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wink, M.; Botschen, F.; Gosmann, C.; Schäfer, H.; Waterman, P.G. Chemotaxonomy seen from a phylogenetic perspective and evolution of secondary metabolism. In Annual Plant Reviews. Biochemistry of Plant Secondary Metabolism; Wink, M., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 40. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cowling, W.A.; Huyghe, C.; Święcicki, W. Lupin Breeding. In Lupins as Crop Plants: Biology, Production, and Utilization; Gladstones, J.S., Atkins, C.A., Hamblin, J., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998; pp. 93–120. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kamel, K.A.; Święcicki, W.; Kaczmarek, Z.; Barzyk, P. Quantitative and qualitative content of alkaloids in seeds of a narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2016, 63, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kroc, M.; Rybiński, W.; Wilczura, P.; Kamel, K.; Kaczmarek, Z.; Barzyk, P.; Święcicki, W. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of alkaloids composition in the seeds of a white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017, 64, 1853–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wink, M.; Meißner, C.; Witte, L. Patterns of quinolizidine alkaloids in 56 species of the genus Lupinus. Phytochem. 1995, 38, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leete, E. Biosynthesis and metabolism of gramine in Lupinus hartwegii. Phytochemistry 1975, 14, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saito, K.; Koike, Y.; Suzuki, H.; Murakoshi, I. Biogenetic implication of lupin alkaloid biosynthesis in bitter and sweet forms of Lupinus luteus and L. albus. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 1041–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hirai, M.Y.; Suzuki, H.; Yamazaki, M.; Saito, K. Biochemical and partial molecular characterization of bitter and sweet forms of Lupinus angustifolius, an experimental model for study of molecular regulation of quinolizidine alkaloid biosynthesis. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 48, 1458–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Suzuki, H.; Murakoshi, I.; Saito, K. A novel O-tigloyltransferase for alkaloid biosynthesis in plants. Purification, characterization, and distribution in Lupinus plants. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 15853–15860. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Bunsupa, S.; Katayama, K.; Ikeura, E.; Oikawa, A.; Toyooka, K.; Saito, K.; Yamazaki, M. Lysine decarboxylase catalyzes the first step of quinolizidine alkaloid biosynthesis and coevolved with alkaloid production in leguminosae. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1202–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Okada, T.; Hirai, M.Y.; Suzuki, H.; Yamazaki, M.; Saito, K. Molecular characterization of a novel quinolizidine alkaloid o-tigloyltransferase: cDNA cloning, catalytic activity of recombinant protein and expression analysis in Lupinus plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bunsupa, S.; Okada, T.; Saito, K.; Yamazaki, M. An acyltransferase-like gene obtained by differential gene expression profiles of quinolizidine alkaloid-producing and nonproducing cultivars of Lupinus angustifolius. Plant Biotechnol. 2011, 28, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, T.; Nagy, I.; Mancinotti, D.; Otterbach, S.L.; Andersen, T.B.; Motawia, M.S.; Asp, T.; Geu-Flores, F. Transcript profiling of a bitter variety of narrow-leafed lupin to discover alkaloid biosynthetic genes. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5527–5537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Frick, K.M.; Foley, R.C.; Kamphuis, L.G.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Garg, G.; Singh, K.B. Characterization of the genetic factors affecting quinolizidine alkaloid biosynthesis and its response to abiotic stress in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 23, 13172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kroc, M.; Koczyk, G.; Kamel, K.A.; Czepiel, K.; Fedorowicz-Strońska, O.; Krajewski, P.; Kosińska, J.; Podkowiński, J.; Wilczura, P.; Święcicki, W. Transcriptome-derived investigation of biosynthesis of quinolizidine alkaloids in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) highlights candidate genes linked to iucundus locus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kroc, M.; Czepiel, K.; Wilczura, P.; Mokrzycka, M.; Święcicki, W. Development and Validation of a Gene-Targeted dCAPS Marker for Marker-Assisted Selection of Low-Alkaloid Content in Seeds of Narrow-Leafed Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Genes 2019, 10, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Frick, K.M.; Kamphuis, L.G.; Siddique, K.H.; Singh, K.B.; Foley, R.C. Quinolizidine alkaloid biosynthesis in lupins and prospects for grain quality improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Święcicki, W.; Kroc, M.; Kamel, K. Lupins. In Grain legumes, Handbook of Plant Breeding; De Ron, A.M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; Volume 10, pp. 179–218. [Google Scholar]
  36. Święcicki, W.K.; Cowling, W.A.; Buirchell, B.J. Databases and genetic resources evaluation in Lupinus collections. In Proceedings of the 9th International Lupin Conference. Lupin, an ancient crop for the new millennium, Klink/Muritz, Germany, 20–24 June 2000; pp. 132–137. [Google Scholar]
  37. Aïnouche, A.; Bayer, R. Genetic evidence supports the new anatolian lupine accession, Lupinus anatolicus, as an old world “rough-seeded” lupine (section Scabrispermae) related to L. pilosus. Folia Geobot. 2000, 35, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aïnouche, A.; Greinwald, R.; Witte, L.; Huon, A. Seed alkaloid composition of Lupinus tassilicus maire (Fabaceae: Genisteae) and comparison with its related rough seeded lupin species. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1996, 24, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cook, D.; Lee, S.T.; Pfister, J.A.; Stonecipher, C.A.; Welch, K.D.; Green, B.T.; Panter, K.E. Alkaloid profiling as an approach to differentiate Lupinus garfieldensis, Lupinus sabinianus and Lupinus sericeus. Phytochem. Anal. 2012, 23, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Boschin, G.; Annicchiarico, P.; Resta, D.; D’Agostina, A.; Arnoldi, A. Quinolizidine alkaloids in seeds of lupin genotypes of different origins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3657–3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Osorio, C.E.; Amiard, V.S.E.; Aravena-Calvo, J.; Udall, J.A.; Doyle, J.J.; Maureira-Butler, I.J. Chromatographic fingerprinting of Lupinus luteus L. (Leguminosae) main secondary metabolites: A case of domestication affecting crop variability. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2018, 65, 1281–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Muzquiz, M.; Guillamon, E.; Burbano, C.; Pascual, H.; Cabellos, B.; Cuadrado, C.; Pedrosa, M.M. Chemical composition of a new Lupinus species found in Spain, Lupinus mariae-josephi H. Pascual (Fabaceae). Span. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 9, 1233–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ciesiołka, D.; Muzquiz, M.; Burbano, C.; Altares, P.; Pedrosa, M.M.; Wysocki, W.; Folkman, W.; Popenda, M.; Gulewicz, K. An effect of various nitrogen forms used as fertilizer on Lupinus albus L. Yield and protein, alkaloid and α-galactosides content. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2005, 191, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jansen, G.; Jürgens, H.U.; Ordon, F. Effects of temperature on the alkaloid content of seeds of Lupinus angustifolius cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2009, 195, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Christiansen, J.L.; Jørnsgård, B.; Buskov, S.; Olsen, C.E. Effect of drought stress on content and composition of seed alkaloids in narrow-leafed lupin, Lupinus angustifolius L. Eur. J. Agron. 1997, 7, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jansen, G.; Jürgens, H.-U.; Schliephake, E.; Ordon, F. Effect of the Soil pH on the alkaloid content of Lupinus angustifolius. Int. J. Agron. 2012, Article ID 269878, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kurlovich, B.S. Lupins (Geography, Classification, Genetic Resources and Breeding); OY International North Express: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2002; p. 468. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gawłowska, M.; Święcicki, W.; Lahuta, L.; Kaczmarek, Z. Raffinose family oligosaccharides in seeds of Pisum wild taxa, type lines for seed genes, domesticated and advanced breeding materials. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017, 64, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Islam, S.; Ma, W.; Appels, R.; Yan, G. Mass spectrometric fingerprints of seed protein for defining Lupinus spp. relationships. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 939–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Susek, K.; Bielski, W.K.; Hasterok, R.; Naganowska, B.; Wolko, B. A first glimpse of wild lupin karyotype variation as revealed by comparative cytogenetic mapping. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Williams, C.A.; Demissie, A.; Harborne, J.B. Flavonoids as taxonomic markers in old world Lupinus species. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1983, 11, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Käss, E.; Wink, M. Phylogenetic relationships in the Papilionoideae (Family Leguminosae) based on nucleotide sequences of cpDNA (rbcL) and ncDNA (ITS 1 and 2). Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 1997, 8, 65–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Morrison, D.F. Multivariate Statistical Methods; Mc Graw-Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gabriel, K.R. A procedure for testing the homogeneity of all sets of means in analysis of variance. Biometrics 1964, 20, 459–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Caliński, T.; Czajka, S.; Kaczmarek, Z. Principal component analysis and its applications. Biom. Stat. Algorithms 1975, 4, 159–185. [Google Scholar]
Plants 08 00548 g001 550
Figure 1. Putative biosynthetic pathway of alkaloids in Lupinus plants; (a) Lysine-derived: quinolizidine alkaloids (QAs), partly published by Bunsupa et al. (2012b) and Aniszewski (2007), and piperidine alkaloids (e.g., ammodendrine); (b) Tryptophan-derived indole alkaloid gramine; LDC-lysine decarboxylase [27]; CAO-copper amine oxidase [30], HMT/HLT-(−)-13α-hydroxymultiflorine/(+)-13α-hydroxylupanine O-tigloyltransferase [26]. Dotted lines denote uncharacterized or multistep reactions.
Figure 1. Putative biosynthetic pathway of alkaloids in Lupinus plants; (a) Lysine-derived: quinolizidine alkaloids (QAs), partly published by Bunsupa et al. (2012b) and Aniszewski (2007), and piperidine alkaloids (e.g., ammodendrine); (b) Tryptophan-derived indole alkaloid gramine; LDC-lysine decarboxylase [27]; CAO-copper amine oxidase [30], HMT/HLT-(−)-13α-hydroxymultiflorine/(+)-13α-hydroxylupanine O-tigloyltransferase [26]. Dotted lines denote uncharacterized or multistep reactions.
Plants 08 00548 g001
Plants 08 00548 g002 550
Figure 2. Boxplot showing relative abundances of the three most abundant alkaloids: (A) lupinine, (B) lupanine, and (C) multiflorine within 13 Old World lupin species (based on data presented in Table S1). The species are arranged in the following order: Lupinus albus (1), L. angustifolius (2), L. mariae-josephi (3), L. luteus (4), L. hispanicus subsp. hispanicus (5), L. hispanicus subsp. bicolor (6), L. × hispanicoluteus (7), L. atlanticus (8), L. palaestinus (9), L. anatolicus (10), L. digitatus (11), L. cosentinii (12), L. pilosus (13), and L. micranthus (14).
Figure 2. Boxplot showing relative abundances of the three most abundant alkaloids: (A) lupinine, (B) lupanine, and (C) multiflorine within 13 Old World lupin species (based on data presented in Table S1). The species are arranged in the following order: Lupinus albus (1), L. angustifolius (2), L. mariae-josephi (3), L. luteus (4), L. hispanicus subsp. hispanicus (5), L. hispanicus subsp. bicolor (6), L. × hispanicoluteus (7), L. atlanticus (8), L. palaestinus (9), L. anatolicus (10), L. digitatus (11), L. cosentinii (12), L. pilosus (13), and L. micranthus (14).
Plants 08 00548 g002
Plants 08 00548 g003 550
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of 13 Old World lupin species (including two L. hispanicus subspecies) characterized by the three most abundant alkaloids (lupanine, lupinine, and multiflorine). PC1 and PC2 components explained a combined 98.56% of the variance. Original data were expressed in relative abundance (%) before the PCA.
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of 13 Old World lupin species (including two L. hispanicus subspecies) characterized by the three most abundant alkaloids (lupanine, lupinine, and multiflorine). PC1 and PC2 components explained a combined 98.56% of the variance. Original data were expressed in relative abundance (%) before the PCA.
Plants 08 00548 g003
Table
Table 1. Nineteen major alkaloids (relative abundance > 1% of the total alkaloid content) detected in the seeds of Old World lupins. Mean values per species are shown (for details see Additional file 1: Table S1). 13-Hydroxymultiflorine detected in certain accessions was not identified as a major alkaloid. The data were calculated in relation to lupanine standard).
Table 1. Nineteen major alkaloids (relative abundance > 1% of the total alkaloid content) detected in the seeds of Old World lupins. Mean values per species are shown (for details see Additional file 1: Table S1). 13-Hydroxymultiflorine detected in certain accessions was not identified as a major alkaloid. The data were calculated in relation to lupanine standard).
SpeciesOrigin ##LupinineEpilupinineMultiflorine11.12-secodidehydromultiflorine13-tigloyloxymultiflorine13-angelolyoxomultiflorineLupanine13-hydroxylupanineIsolupanine11.12-didehydrolupanine5.6-didehydrolupanineOxolupanine13-benzoyloxylupanineSparteineAngustifolineAlbineAmmodendrineN-methylammodendrineGramine
L. angustifoliusW 46.40 #35.602.50 # 15.50 #
L. albusW 5.52 #1.74 # 76.068.23 # 2.07 #4.48 #1.04 #
L. luteusW67.460.33 # 28.86 1.40 # 1.77 #
L. anatolicusW11.12 85.68
L. palaestinusW15.07 65.361.48 #0.96 # 0.79 # 1.12 #6.22 7.220.59 #
L. cosentiniiW25.35 66.643.301.15 # 0.34 # 0.76 # 1.36 #
G23.51 73.941.04 # 1.13 #
L. atlanticusW66.68 30.351.35 #
G72.12 26.030.76 #
U63.99 34.40
L. pilosusW27.76 63.852.670.87 # 0.94 #1.31 # 0.77 #
U28.06 69.560.77 # 0.78 # 0.51 #
L. digitatusU31.50 66.43
L. micranthusW 91.61 3.20 1.77
G 81.70 11.182.15 # 3.20 # 0.35 #
L. × hispanicoluteusW83.72 3.68 # 1.81 #0.43 #10.31 #
L. hispanicus subsa. bicolorW97.18 2.62 #
U98.29
L. hispanicus subsp. hispanicusW97.51 0.15 # 2.20
L. mariae-josephiW 68.425.1218.274.05 3.01
I 70.304.7620.783.48
# in certain accessions this alkaloid was not detected at all or was detected at a level < 1% of the total alkaloid contents. ## W, Polish Lupinus Genebank Wiatrowo; G, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben (Germany); U, USDA National Plant Germplasm System; I, Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (Spain).
Table
Table 2. Statistical comparison of the Old World lupin intraspecies variability with regard to total alkaloid content in their seeds (expressed as the percentage of the seed dry weight (DW)).
Table 2. Statistical comparison of the Old World lupin intraspecies variability with regard to total alkaloid content in their seeds (expressed as the percentage of the seed dry weight (DW)).
SpeciesNumber of AccessionsTotal Alkaloid Content (% of the seed DW). Mean Values for SpeciesVariation Coefficient (%)F-Statistic for Differences Between Accessions
MinimumMaximum
L. palaestinus60.07740.230835.4823.266 **
L. cosentinii50.13170.250927.903.259
L. atlanticus50.12630.264026.3356.128 **
L. pilosus60.08720.451754.2377.281 **
L. × hispanicoluteus70.00872.118978.3117.829 **
L. hispanicus subsp. bicolor40.69121.598236.755.302
L. hispanicus subsp. hispanicus130.77431.983430.203.213 *
* Significant at 0.05. ** Significant at 0.01.
Table
Table 3. Old World lupin species divided into homogenous groups based on the total content of alkaloids accumulated in their seeds (expressed as a percentage of the seed dry weight).
Table 3. Old World lupin species divided into homogenous groups based on the total content of alkaloids accumulated in their seeds (expressed as a percentage of the seed dry weight).
Homogenous GroupsMean Values of Total Alkaloid ContentsSum of SquaresSpecies
GroupSpecies
15.6611 L. mariae-josephi
21.04311.21010.5706L. hispanicus subsp. hispanicus
L. hispanicus subsp. bicolor
L. × hispanicoluteus
L. micranthus
1.0772
0.9868
0.8984
30.17650.25880.0946L. pilosus
L. atlanticus
L. cosentinii
L. palaestinus
L. anatolicus
0.1827
0.1799
0.1436
0.1177

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Święcicki, W.; Czepiel, K.; Wilczura, P.; Barzyk, P.; Kaczmarek, Z.; Kroc, M. Chromatographic Fingerprinting of the Old World Lupins Seed Alkaloids: A Supplemental Tool in Species Discrimination. Plants 2019, 8, 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120548

AMA Style

Święcicki W, Czepiel K, Wilczura P, Barzyk P, Kaczmarek Z, Kroc M. Chromatographic Fingerprinting of the Old World Lupins Seed Alkaloids: A Supplemental Tool in Species Discrimination. Plants. 2019; 8(12):548. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120548

Chicago/Turabian Style

Święcicki, Wojciech, Katarzyna Czepiel, Paulina Wilczura, Paweł Barzyk, Zygmunt Kaczmarek, and Magdalena Kroc. 2019. "Chromatographic Fingerprinting of the Old World Lupins Seed Alkaloids: A Supplemental Tool in Species Discrimination" Plants 8, no. 12: 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120548

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop