Modulation of Plant-Derived Bioactive Phenolic Compounds by Cytokinins in Hypericum amblysepalum Shoot Cultures
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. LC–MS/MS Phenolic Profile
2.2. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)
2.3. Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)
2.4. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
3. Discussion
4. Material and Methods
4.1. Plant Material
4.2. Chemicals
4.3. Growth Conditions and Treatment
4.4. Quantitative Evaluation of Phenolic Metabolites
4.5. Determination of Total Phenolic Content (TPC)
4.6. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)
4.7. Determination of DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
4.8. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Crockett, S.L.; Robson, N.K. Taxonomy and chemotaxonomy of the genus Hypericum. Med. Aromat. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Babacan, E.Y.; Aytaç, Z.; Pınar, M. Hypericum ekerii (Hypericaceae), a new species from Turkey. Pak. J. Bot. 2017, 49, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar]
- Çirak, C.; Radusiene, J.; Janulis, V.; Ivanauskas, L.; Çamaş, N.; Ayan, A.K. Phenolic constituents of Hypericum triquetrifolium Turra growing in Turkey: Variation among populations and plant parts. Turk. J. Biol. 2011, 35, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazzara, S.; Napoli, E.; Carruba, A. Hypericum spp.: A resource from wild Mediterranean flora for the treatment of mild depression. Bioact. Phytochem. 2015, 3, 337–354. [Google Scholar]
- Ozkan, E.E.; Mat, A. An overview on Hypericum species of Turkey. J. Pharmacogn. Phytother. 2013, 5, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, X.J.; Chen, F.; Chen, C.; Zhu, C.R.; Lu, Y.N. LC–MS/MS-based studies on the antidepressant effect of hypericin in the chronic unpredictable mild stress rat model. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 169, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, A.I.; Pinho, C.; Sarmento, B.; Dias, A.C. Neuroprotective activity of Hypericum perforatum and its major components. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howell, S.H.; Lall, S.; Che, P. Cytokinins and shoot development. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Hnatuszko-Konka, K.; Zarzycka, M.; Kuźma, Ł. The stimulatory effect of purine-type cytokinins on proliferation and polyphenolic compound accumulation in shoot culture of Salvia viridis. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirakosyan, A.B.; Vardapetyan, R.R.; Charchoglyan, A.G.; Yamamoto, H.; Hayashi, H.; Inoue, K. The effect of cork pieces on pseudohypericin production in cells of Hypericum perforatum shoots. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 48, 816–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, B. Effects of chemical elicitors on the production of secondary metabolites and endogenous hormones in Hypericum sampsonii. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136, S153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danova, K.; Čellárová, E.; Macková, A.; Daxnerová, Z.; Kapchina-Toteva, V. In vitro culture of Hypericum rumeliacum and production of phenolics and flavonoids. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2010, 46, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coste, A.; Gille, E.; Grigoras, V.; Necula, R.; Halmagyi, A.; Coldea, G.; Deliu, C. Polyphenolic compounds production in shoot cultures of two Romanian Hypericum species. Analele Stiintifice Ale Univ. Al I Cuza Din Iasi 2016, 62, 58. [Google Scholar]
- TÜBİVES (Türkiye Bitkileri Veri Servisi). Hypericum amblysepalum Distribution Data. 2024. Available online: http://www.tubives.com (accessed on 22 May 2025).
- Keskin, C. Antioxidant, anticancer and anticholinesterase activities of flower, fruit and seed extracts of Hypericum amblysepalum. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015, 16, 2763–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Liu, X.N.; Zhang, X.Q.; Sun, J.S. Effects of cytokinins and elicitors on the production of hypericins and hyperforin metabolites in Hypericum sampsonii and H. perforatum. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 53, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namli, S.; Akbas, F.; Isikalan, C.; Tilkat, E.A.; Basaran, D. The effect of different plant hormones on multiple shoots of Hypericum retusum. Plant Omics 2010, 3, 12–17. [Google Scholar]
- Coste, A.; Halmagyi, A.; Butiuc-Keul, A.L.; Deliu, C.; Coldea, G.; Hurdu, B. In Vitro propagation and cryopreservation of Romanian endemic and rare Hypericum species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 110, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franklin, G.; Dias, A.C.P. Organogenesis and embryogenesis in several Hypericum perforatum genotypes. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2006, 42, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karakuş, P. Investigation of In Vitro Micropropagation Pathways of Hypericum spectabile, an Endemic Species Growing in the Southeastern Anatolia Region. Master’s Thesis, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Charchoglyan, A.; Abrahamyan, A.; Fujii, I.; Boubakir, Z.; Gulder, T.A.; Kutchan, T.M.; Beerhues, L. Differential accumulation of hyperforin and secohyperforin in Hypericum perforatum tissue cultures. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 2670–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saïdi, R.; Rahmouni, S.; El Ansari, Z.N.; Maouni, A.; Baddoc, A.; Lamarti, A. Effect of cytokinins on the micropropagation of carob through shoot tip culture. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1469–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Doğan, M. The effect of zeatin and different auxin combinations on in vitro micropropagation of Limnophila aromatica (Lamk.) Merr., an important medicinal plant. KSU J. Agric. Nat. 2019, 22, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weremczuk-Jeżyna, I.; Kuźma, Ł.; Kiss, A.K.; Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I. Effect of cytokinins on shoots proliferation and rosmarinic and salvianolic acid B production in shoot culture of Dracocephalum forrestii WW Smith. Acta physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakuta, M. Effects of cytokinins on anthocyanin accumulation in plant cell and organ cultures. J. Plant Res. 2000, 113, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cirak, C.; Radusiene, J.; Jakstas, V.; Ivanauskas, L.; Seyis, F.; Yayla, F. Secondary metabolites of seven Hypericum species growing in Turkey. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 2244–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altuntaş, C. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity in different plant parts of Hypericum elongatum and Hypericum orientale: A comparative study. Turk. J. Anal. Chem. 2026, 8, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surmuş, A.H. Elicitors enhanced the production of bioactive compounds in shoot cultures of Hypericum amblysepalum. Bot. Serbica 2023, 47, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asan, H.S.; Özen, H.Ç.; Onay, A.; Asan, N. The effect of different BAP concentrations on proliferation and hypericin content of Hypericum retusum. Biol. Sci. Res. J. 2014, 7, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
- Tusevski, O.; Vinterhalter, B.; Milošević, D.K.; Soković, M.; Ćirić, A.; Vinterhalter, D.; Simić, S.G. Production of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in hairy root and shoot cultures of Hypericum perforatum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 128, 589–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akdeniz, M. Determination of Chemical Composition of Hypericum Species by LC–MS/MS and Evaluation of Biological Activities. Ph.D. Thesis, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates by Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhishen, J.; Mengcheng, T.; Jianming, W. Determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SPSS. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics (accessed on 5 March 2026).
- Akdeniz, M.; Yilmaz, M.A.; Ertas, A.; Yener, I.; Firat, M.; Aydin, F.; Kolak, U. Method validation of 15 phytochemicals in Hypericum lysimachioides var. spathulatum by LC–MS/MS, and fatty acid, essential oil, and aroma profiles with biological activities. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2020, 14, 3194–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| PGR Concentration (mg L−1) | Average Dry Weight (per Explant) | Average Shoot Numbers (per Explant) | Average Shoot Lenght (cm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | ZEA | BAP | ZEA | BAP | ZEA | |
| 0.0 | 5.27 ± 0.35 b | 5.27 ± 0.35 b | 1.0 ± 0.00 c | 1.0 ± 0.00 a | 4.8 ± 0.78 a | 4.8 ± 0.78 a |
| 0.1 | 26.5 ± 2.15 a | 16.9 ± 1.39 a | 11.29 ± 4.48 a | 2.76 ± 0.75 a | 2.1 ± 0.66 b | 3.2 ± 0.88 b |
| 0.25 | 23.4 ± 4.57 a | 13.0 ± 1.50 a | 9.07 ± 3.25 b | 2.33 ± 0.90 a | 1.7 ± 0.48 b | 2.9 ± 0.77 b |
| 0.5 | 19.5 ± 3.24 a | 19.5 ± 2.15 a | 7.00 ± 2.29 b | 3.11 ± 0.92 a | 1.8 ± 0.78 b | 3.4 ± 0.75 b |
| 1.0 | 20.2 ± 3.95 a | 17.5 ± 2.23 a | 6.73 ± 2.21 b | 2.88 ± 1.31 a | 1.03 ± 0.39 b | 3.0 ± 1.2 b |
| Phenolic | Cytokinin Treatment (mg L−1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounds | RT | Control | 0.1 BAP | 0.25 BAP | 0.5 BAP | 1.0 BAP | 0.1 ZEA | 0.25 ZEA | 0.5 ZEA | 1.0 ZEA |
| Hypericin | 30.18 | 6.70 ± 1.12 e | 28.80 ± 0.54 bc | 18.65 ± 0.35 c | 17.80 ± 0.33 c | 11.90 ± 0.22 d | 52.60 ± 0.99 a | 33.70 ± 0.63 b | 51.50 ± 0.97 a | 31.90 ± 1.33 b |
| Pseudohypericin | 26.34 | 47.21 ± 0.81 e | 149.90 ± 2.57 ab | 92.80 ± 1.5 c | 81.90 ± 1.40 c | 63.50 ± 1.09 d | 169.90 ± 2.92 a | 115.80 ± 1.99 b | 139.70 ± 2.40 ab | 123.70 ± 2.12 b |
| Hyperforin | 28.97 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 3.100 ± 0.12 | 0.12 ± 0.005 | N.D. | 4.60 ± 0.19 |
| Rutin | 13.67 | 156.20 ± 2.12 c | 193.70 ± 2.63 b | 134.50 ± 1.82 d | 150.10 ± 2.04 cd | 128.90 ± 1.7 d | 261.50 ± 3.55 a | 150.40 ± 2.04 cd | 183.30 ± 2.49 bc | 162.80 ± 2.21 c |
| Hesperidin | 13.68 | 97.60 ± 1.58 b | 103.02 ± 1.66 b | 72.20 ± 1.16 c | 80.30 ± 1.30 c | 68.20 ± 1.10 c | 123.35 ± 1.99 a | 76.40 ± 1.23 c | 94.40 ± 1.52 b | 84.20 ± 1.36 c |
| Hyperoside | 13.69 | 3146.5 ± 39.6 b | 2067.5 ± 26.05 d | 1539.4 ± 19.3 e | 1621.8 ± 20.43 e | 1476.7 ± 18.60 e | 3744.9 ± 47.18 a | 2598.4 ± 32.74 c | 2960.3 ± 37.30 b | 2897.2 ± 36.50 b |
| Quercetin | 17.10 | 19.80 ± 1.13 b | 38.40 ± 2.20 a | 30.40 ± 1.74 ab | 51.10 ± 2.92 a | 27.55 ± 1.57 ab | 45.80 ± 2.62 a | 27.90 ± 1.59 ab | 32.30 ± 1.85 ab | 32.30 ± 1.85 ab |
| Quercitrin | 14.98 | 128.00 ± 1.7 a | 20.80 ± 0.27 e | 25.80 ± 0.34 d | 16.90 ± 0.22 f | 11.35 ± 0.37 g | 56.95 ± 0.75 b | 42.60 ± 0.56 c | 47.80 ± 0.63 ac | 47.30 ± 0.62 c |
| Luteolin | 17.78 | 3.01 ± 0.05 b | 1.10 ± 0.02 e | 0.90 ± 0.016 f | 0.85 ± 0.015 f | 1.50 ± 0.028 d | 4.20 ± 0.07 a | 1.50 ± 0.02 d | 1.60 ± 0.03 d | 2.50 ± 0.04 c |
| Astragalin | 15.13 | 23.30 ± 0.35 a | 15.06 ± 0.23 c | 10.30 ± 0.15 d | 7.70 ± 0.11 e | 7.03 ± 0.10 e | 20.30 ± 0.31 b | 16.70 ± 0.25 c | 16.40 ± 0.25 c | 16.90 ± 0.25 c |
| Apigenin | 19.20 | 0.25 ± 0.004 e | 0.94 ± 0.017 b | 0.59 ± 0.010 c | 0.93 ± 0.016 b | 0.40 ± 0.007 d | 0.20 ± 0.003 e | 0.10 ± 0.001 f | 0.68 ± 0.012 c | 0.10 ± 0.001 f |
| Luteolin-7-glucoside | 13.20 | 4.65 ± 0.03 b | 3.60 ± 0.03 c | 2.70 ± 0.02 d | 2.50 ± 0.02 e | 3.60 ± 0.03 c | 6.04 ± 0.05 a | 4.60 ± 0.039 b | 3.65 ± 0.031 c | 4.35 ± 0.037 b |
| Apigetrin | 14.54 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
| Protocatechuic acid | 7.00 | 12.62 ± 0.27 d | 17.90 ± 0.38 ab | 10.90 ± 0.23 e | 20.35 ± 0.43 a | 14.80 ± 0.31 c | 18.20 ± 0.39 a | 12.35 ± 0.26 d | 18.01 ± 0.30 a | 18.10 ± 0.38 a |
| Chlorogenic acid | 8.03 | 29.90 ± 0.89 d | 27.01 ± 0.80 d | 23.90 ± 0.71 e | 50.80 ± 1.51 b | 22.40 ± 0.66 e | 66.30 ± 1.98 a | 51.90 ± 1.55 b | 44.02 ± 1.31 c | 44.20 ± 1.32 c |
| Cytokinin Treatment | TPC (mg GAE g−1 DW) | TFC (mg QE g−1 DW) | Antioxidant Activity (mg ASA g−1 DW) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PGR-free | 18.11 ± 0.58 a | 43.79 ± 0.98 a | 18.2 ± 0.001 a |
| 0.1 BAP | 9.31 ± 0.66 bc | 21.11 ± 1.78 c | 17.2 ± 0.002 a |
| 0.25 BAP | 8.64 ± 2.63 bc | 13.93 ± 0.84 c | 17.45 ± 0.017 a |
| 0.5 BAP | 9.02 ± 1.22 bc | 21.30 ± 2.13 c | 17.4 ± 0.015 a |
| 1.0 BAP | 6.47 ± 1.02 c | 13.27 ± 1.16 c | 17.7 ± 0.006 a |
| 0.1 ZEA | 12.48 ± 0.46 b | 38.37 ± 0.58 ab | 18.0 ± 0.002 a |
| 0.25 ZEA | 10.59 ± 1.29 b | 35.76 ± 2.62 ab | 18.15 ± 0.011 a |
| 0.5 ZEA | 11.79 ± 1.14 b | 37.13 ± 1.11 ab | 17.75 ± 0.015 a |
| 1.0 ZEA | 8.44 ± 0.34 bc | 21.86 ± 2.40 c | 18.65 ± 0.010 a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Surmuş Asan, H. Modulation of Plant-Derived Bioactive Phenolic Compounds by Cytokinins in Hypericum amblysepalum Shoot Cultures. Plants 2026, 15, 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15071017
Surmuş Asan H. Modulation of Plant-Derived Bioactive Phenolic Compounds by Cytokinins in Hypericum amblysepalum Shoot Cultures. Plants. 2026; 15(7):1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15071017
Chicago/Turabian StyleSurmuş Asan, Hilal. 2026. "Modulation of Plant-Derived Bioactive Phenolic Compounds by Cytokinins in Hypericum amblysepalum Shoot Cultures" Plants 15, no. 7: 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15071017
APA StyleSurmuş Asan, H. (2026). Modulation of Plant-Derived Bioactive Phenolic Compounds by Cytokinins in Hypericum amblysepalum Shoot Cultures. Plants, 15(7), 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15071017

