Dynamic Changes and Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Quality of Cichorium intybus at Different Growth Stages
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Area Overview
2.2. Experimental Design
2.2.1. Plot Setup
2.2.2. Sowing and Field Management
2.2.3. Delineation of Growth Stages and Sampling Periods
- (1)
- Trophophase: Plants attain a height of 30–40 cm with no bud formation; the sampling period was from 20 June to 30 June.
- (2)
- Flowering period: More than 50% of the plants exhibit visibly detectable buds (diameter of 2–3 mm); the sampling period was from 20 July to 30 July.
- (3)
- Bearing phase: The fruit has a hard outer shell with a stable color (e.g., deep brown, gray-black, etc.) and plump seeds with a significantly reduced moisture content. At this stage, gently rubbing the fruit causes the seeds to easily detach. The sampling period was from 20 August to 30 August.
2.3. Determination Methods
2.3.1. Determination of Morphological Indicators
- (1)
- Plant height: measured using a tape measure from the base of the Cichorium intybus to the apex.
- (2)
- Basal stem: measured with a vernier caliper at the second internode from the base of the stem.
- (3)
- Leaf area: determined using an LI-3000A leaf area meter (LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA).
- (4)
- Leaf relative water content: Following the method described by Gao Junfeng [21], one complete leaf with uniform vigor was selected from each plant. The fresh weight (Wf) of the leaf was recorded, and then the leaf was immersed in a Petri dish containing distilled water for 24 h. After soaking, the surface moisture was removed using absorbent paper and the saturated weight (Wt) was recorded. Finally, the leaf was dried in an 80 °C oven for 48 h until a constant weight was achieved to obtain the dry weight (Wd). The relative water content (RWC) was then calculated using Formula (1).
2.3.2. Yield Determination
2.3.3. Determination of Nutrient Elements
2.3.4. Determination of Nutritional Components
- (1)
- The dry matter (DM) content was measured by drying in a thermostatic forced-air oven at 65 °C until a constant weight was achieved.
- (2)
- Crude ash was determined by ashing the sample in a Nabertherm LE14/16/R6 (Nabertherm GmbH, Lilienthal, Germany) muffle furnace until reaching a constant weight.
- (3)
- Crude fat (EE) was measured using an Ankom XT15 (ANKOM Technology Corporation, Macedon, NY, USA) fat-determination apparatus.
- (4)
- Water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) were measured using a colorimetric method with a UV spectrophotometer.
- (5)
- Crude protein (CP) was analyzed using a FOSS Kjeltec 2300 (FOSS Analytical AB, Hillerød, Denmark) automatic protein analyzer.
- (6)
- The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were measured using the Van Soest method on an Ankom2000 fiber analyzer.
2.4. Data Processing and Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Analysis of Agronomic Traits of Cichorium intybus During Different Periods
3.1.1. Analysis of Morphological Indexes of Cichorium intybus During Different Periods
3.1.2. Analysis of Cichorium intybus Fresh Yield During Different Periods
3.2. Analysis of Nutritional Quality of Cichorium intybus Grass in Different Periods
3.2.1. Analysis of Nutritional Indexes of Cichorium intybus Grass in Different Periods
3.2.2. Comparison of Nutrient Elements During Different Growth Periods of Cichorium intybus Grass
3.2.3. Analysis of Relative Feeding Value and Relative Forage Quality of Cichorium intybus Grass During Different Periods
3.3. Correlation Analysis
3.3.1. Correlation Analysis of Cichorium intybus Agronomic Traits During Different Periods
3.3.2. Correlation Analysis Between Morphological Indexes and Nutritional Quality of Cichorium intybus Grass During Different Periods
3.4. Membership Function Analysis
4. Discussions
4.1. Differential Analysis of Cichorium intybus During Different Growth Stages
4.2. Mechanism Underlying the Correlation Between Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Quality
4.3. Determination of the Optimal Harvesting Period
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, J.; Wang, M.L. Study on the coupling and coordination relationship between China’s forage industry and herbivorous animal husbandry. Chin. J. Anim. Sci. 2024, 60, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Zhou, R.; Chen, Y.S. Estimation of feed grain supply-demand gap in China. Shandong Agric. Sci. 2022, 54, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauser, T.P.; Jrgensen, R.B.; Toneatto, F. Reduced sexual compatibility between cultivated and wild chicory and their F1 hybrids. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2012, 59, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baes, P.G.; Van Cutsem, P.J. Isozyme polymorphism in three gene pools of cultivated chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Euphytica 1993, 71, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Z.Q.; Yang, S.P.; Zhang, H.W.; Sun, X.M. Effects of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on forage yield of chicory in eastern agricultural region of Qinghai. J. Gansu Agric. Univ. 2025, 60, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, M.Q.; Zhou, L.; He, S.M.; Fu, W.; Mou, Q.; Meng, J.J.; Han, Y.F. Effects of different additives on nutritional components and fermentation quality of chicory silage. Feed Res. 2025, 48, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Wang, K.; Lin, S.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, M.; Hu, S.; Hu, H.; Xiang, J.; Chen, F.; Li, G.; et al. Comparison of the Effects between Tannins Extracted from Different Natural Plants on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, Immunity, and Intestinal Flora of Broiler Chickens. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.F.; Hu, X. A New Triterpenoid from the Bulbs of Lilium speciosum var.Gloriosoides. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2019, 55, 289–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, H.W.; Guo, P.; Wang, Y.Q.; Liu, J.N.; Wu, X.M.; Zhang, Y. Analysis on the value and research status of chicory. South. Agric. 2018, 12, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, M.H.; Wan, P.H.; Lv, N.; Hu, W.Y.; Liu, L.; Yu, H.Y.; Li, Q.Y. Research Progress on Extraction, Separation and Purification Technology and Pharmacological Effects of Chicoric Acid. Chin. Arch. Tradit. Chin. Med. 1–16. Available online: https://link.cnki.net/urlid/21.1546.r.20250814.1619.006 (accessed on 11 December 2025).
- PEA-ESPINOZA, M.; Valente, A.H.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Simonsen, H.T.; Boas, U.; Enemark, H.L.; López-Muñoz, R.; Williams, A.R. Antiparasitic activity of chicory (Cichorium intybus) and its natural bioactive compounds in livestock: A review. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chadni, M.; Isidore, E.; Diemer, E.; Ouguir, O.; Brunois, F.; Catteau, R.; Cassan, L.; Ioannou, I. Optimization of extraction conditions to improve chlorogenic acid content and antioxidant activity of extracts from forced witloof chicory roots. Foods 2022, 11, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, M.; Kumar, S.; Banakar, P.S.; Vinay, V.V.; Das, A.; Tyagi, N.; Tyagi, A.K. Synbiotic formulation of Cichorium intybus root powder with Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDC15 and Lactobacillus reuteri BFE7 improves growth performance in Murrah buffalo calves via altering selective gut health indices. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valente, A.H.; De Roode, M.; Ernst, M.; Pena-Espinoza, M.; Bornancin, L.; Bonde, C.S.; Martínez-Valladares, M.; Ramünke, S.; Krücken, J.; Simonsen, H.T. Identification of compounds responsible for the anthelmintic effects of chicory (Cichorium intybus) by molecular networking and bio-guided fractionation. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2021, 15, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, M.Z.; Zhang, B.H.; He, H.J.; Han, X.Y. Identification and analysis of agronomic and physicochemical traits of blanched chicory germplasm resources. China Veg. 2025, 9, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicola, C.; Vincenzo, B.V. Harvesting time on yield and quality of stems. Horticulturae 2000, 533, 505–510. [Google Scholar]
- Rodkiewicz, T. The effect of planting time on the yield of much-curled endive [Cichorium endivia L. var. crispum Lam.]. Veg. Crops Res. Bull. 2001, 55, 191–197. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, X.L.; Guo, Z.Z.; Xiang, K.F.; Na, R.S. Study on introduction and cultivation of 7 chicory varieties. Feed Res. 2017, 4, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Z.Q.; Yang, S.P.; Zhang, H.W.; Wang, L.H.; Sun, X.M. Effects of different chicory varieties and mixed sowing on hay yield and quality of forage. J. Gansu Agric. Univ. 2025, 60, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, S.Y.; Yu, X.H.; Wang, J.L. Research progress on nutritional components of chicory and its application in animal production. Feed Res. 2023, 46, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.F. Experimental Guide to Plant Physiology; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2006; pp. 15–17. [Google Scholar]
- Bao, S.D. Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis, 3rd ed.; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Li, D.; Ji, L.; Li, Y.H. Analysis and evaluation of nutritional quality changes of main forages in Pingluo area of Ningxia. Feed Res. 2022, 45, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.T.; Liu, X.N.; Tang, J.W.; Jia, S.B.; Ma, L. Comparison of yield and nutritional quality of 4 plateau gramineous forages under arid environment. Grassl. Turf. 2022, 42, 57–61+68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.W.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Wang, T.F.; Ma, J.P.; Wang, X.B.; Du, J.M.; Lan, J. Effects of Combined Application of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizers on Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Forage Oat in Rain-Fed Agricultural Area of Ningxia. Pratacultural Sci. 1–16. Available online: https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1069.S.20250311.1654.010 (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Li, X.K.; Zhang, L.P.; Shan, X.H.; Yang, J.W.; Ren, W.; Yang, C.W.; Wang, X.G. Effects of Different Mixed Sowing Methods of Silage Maize and Lablab Bean on Forage Yield and Quality. Acta Agrestia Sin. 1–12. Available online: https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.3362.S.20250924.1711.002 (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Gu, M. Evaluation of Stropharia rugosoannulata Germplasm Resources and Study on Lignocellulose Degradation Mechanism. Master’s Thesis, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.Q. Study on the mechanism of rainfall and agronomic traits synergistically regulating yield formation of Yugu 18. Rural. Sci. Technol. 2025, 16, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.H.; Pan, C.C.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, K.Y.; Xia, J.Z.; Ji, Y.Y.; Wu, Z.Z.; Jiang, X.Y.; Zhou, Y. Effects of different cutting periods on agronomic traits and nutritional quality of sweet sorghum. J. Trop. Biol. 2022, 13, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.L.; Liu, G.L.; Gao, Y.X.; Li, H.L.; Zhang, P.; Li, C. Comparative analysis of main metabolite contents and antioxidant activities of Ganoderma lucidum fruiting bodies at different growth stages. J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2024, 47, 1356–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Qiu, Q.L.; Tian, X. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on production performance and nutritional quality of ryegrass. Feed Res. 2025, 48, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Du, M.C.; Huang, X.P.; Yang, X.G.; Feng, Z.Y.; Du, W.H. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional value of triticale germplasm in different regions of Qinghai. Seed 2023, 42, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.L.; Peng, D.Q.; Kong, X.L.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X.S.; Liu, H.Y.; Yang, H.F. Evaluation of production performance and nutritional value of 5 forage oat varieties in saline-alkali land of Songnen Plain. Feed Res. 2023, 46, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Long, H.Y. Evaluation of production performance and nutritional value of 8 alfalfa varieties in dry-hot area. Chin. J. Grassl. 2024, 46, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.B.; Liang, X.Y.; Yi, Z.X.; Zhang, L.; Ji, Y.; Li, L.X.; Li, M. Evaluation of production performance and nutritional value of 7 sorghum varieties in Tongjiang area. Feed Res. 2024, 47, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, H.X.; Wang, Y.Q.; Li, L.F.; Cai, H.X.; Wang, Y.Q.; Li, L.F.; Wang, J.Q.; Yang, H.Z.; Hou, B.Z. Evaluation of production performance and nutritional value of spring-sown alfalfa in western Henan. China Feed 2025, 03, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, L.B.; Ling, C.; Wang, H.J.; Yu, H.; Sun, Q.; Zhou, L. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional value of 36 alfalfa accessions. Chin. J. Grassl. 2025, 47, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, A.N.; Guan, J.H. Effects of different growth periods on nutritional quality of forage oat. Feed Res. 2023, 46, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, F. Effects of planting density on growth, yield and quality of forage sweet sorghum. Feed Res. 2022, 45, 112–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Item | DM/% | Ash/% | EE/% | CP/% | ADF/% | NDF/% | WSC/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stem | Trophophase | 8.73 ± 0.50 c | 23.30 ± 0.64 a | 2.95 ± 0.56 a | 12.02 ± 0.84 a | 34.23 ± 0.75 c | 41.05 ± 1.86 c | 5.21 ± 0.51 c |
| Flowering period | 16.80 ± 0.62 b | 9.46 ± 0.57 b | 2.39 ± 0.77 a | 5.53 ± 0.64 b | 40.50 ± 0.70 b | 49.49 ± 0.78 b | 11.67 ± 0.43 b | |
| Bearing phase | 20.52 ± 0.69 a | 7.86 ± 1.02 c | 1.95 ± 0.82 a | 4.70 ± 0.76 b | 42.43 ± 1.01 a | 53.13 ± 1.02 a | 13.13 ± 0.39 a | |
| Leaf | Trophophase | 14.04 ± 0.62 B | 19.45 ± 0.65 A | 5.02 ± 0.86 A | 20.32 ± 0.65 A | 20.68 ± 1.09 A | 26.49 ± 0.93 B | 5.77 ± 0.33 B |
| Flowering period | 19.12 ± 0.64 A | 18.26 ± 0.93 A | 4.18 ± 0.35 B | 13.20 ± 0.41 B | 23.45 ± 0.65 A | 30.72 ± 0.45 A | 3.70 ± 0.34 C | |
| Bearing phase | 20.31 ± 1.14 A | 16.56 ± 0.72 B | 2.69 ± 0.53 A | 10.97 ± 0.65 C | 24.45 ± 3.18 A | 31.03 ± 2.98 A | 7.65 ± 0.67 A | |
| Item | Ca/% | P/% | Mg/% | K/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stem | Trophophase | 2.04 ± 0.11 a | 0.44 ± 0.07 a | 0.69 ± 0.09 a | 3.62 ± 0.33 a |
| Flowering period | 1.36 ± 0.06 b | 0.21 ± 0.02 b | 0.37 ± 0.03 b | 2.07 ± 0.06 b | |
| Bearing phase | 1.51 ± 0.17 b | 0.14 ± 0.03 b | 0.33 ± 0.04 b | 1.86 ± 0.06 b | |
| Leaf | Trophophase | 2.61 ± 0.06 A | 0.46 ± 0.03 A | 0.43 ± 0.04 B | 4.52 ± 0.05 B |
| Flowering period | 2.24 ± 0.04 B | 0.29 ± 0.05 B | 0.53 ± 0.07 AB | 4.66 ± 0.06 A | |
| Bearing phase | 2.61 ± 0.03 A | 0.35 ± 0.03 B | 0.57 ± 0.06 A | 4.49 ± 0.08 A | |
| Item | TDN/% | DDM/% | DMI (kg/day) | RFV | RFQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stem | Trophophase | 56.60 | 62.23 | 2.92 | 141.03 | 134.51 |
| Flowering period | 51.88 | 57.35 | 2.42 | 107.80 | 102.28 | |
| Bearing phase | 50.43 | 55.85 | 2.26 | 97.78 | 92.61 | |
| Leaf | Trophophase | 66.78 | 72.79 | 4.53 | 255.61 | 245.94 |
| Flowering period | 64.70 | 70.63 | 3.91 | 213.88 | 205.47 | |
| Bearing phase | 64.70 | 70.63 | 3.87 | 211.75 | 203.41 | |
| Item | Plant Height | Stem Thickness | Tiller Number | Fresh Yield | DM | Ash | EE | CP | ADF | NDF | WSC | Ca | P | Mg | K | Mean Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trophophase | 0.61 | 0.41 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.76 | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.54 |
| Flowering period | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.50 |
| Bearing phase | 0.61 | 0.32 | 0.67 | 0.35 | 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.56 | 0.49 |
| Item | Number of Leaves | Leaf Area | Leaf Water Content | Fresh Yield | DM | Ash | EE | CP | ADF | NDF | WSC | Ca | P | Mg | K | Mean Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trophophase | 0.56 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.38 | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Flowering period | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.63 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.83 | 0.60 | 0.42 | 0.52 |
| Bearing phase | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.85 | 0.50 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ma, X.; Ma, Y.; Yang, G.; Shao, Y.; Li, G.; Meng, X.; Zhang, S. Dynamic Changes and Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Quality of Cichorium intybus at Different Growth Stages. Plants 2026, 15, 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050837
Ma X, Ma Y, Yang G, Shao Y, Li G, Meng X, Zhang S. Dynamic Changes and Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Quality of Cichorium intybus at Different Growth Stages. Plants. 2026; 15(5):837. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050837
Chicago/Turabian StyleMa, Xiaolu, Yunxia Ma, Guang Yang, Yazhou Shao, Gangtie Li, Xiandong Meng, and Shuai Zhang. 2026. "Dynamic Changes and Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Quality of Cichorium intybus at Different Growth Stages" Plants 15, no. 5: 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050837
APA StyleMa, X., Ma, Y., Yang, G., Shao, Y., Li, G., Meng, X., & Zhang, S. (2026). Dynamic Changes and Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Quality of Cichorium intybus at Different Growth Stages. Plants, 15(5), 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050837
