Macaw Palm Propagation Strategies: Advances, Gaps, and Future Directions for a Promising Oleaginous Crop—A Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Economic, Environmental, and Industrial Relevance of Macaw Palm
1.2. Distribution, Adaptability, and Contribution to Sustainability Goals
1.3. Biological Traits and Challenges for Domestication
1.4. Advances in Propagation Techniques and the Role of Biotechnology
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Sexual Propagation
2.2. Asexual Propagation
3. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
4. Material and Methods
4.1. Data Source and Search Strategy
4.2. Bibliometric Analysis
4.3. Data Cleaning and Keyword Standardization
4.4. Thematic Map Analysis
4.5. Classification of Propagation Strategies
4.6. Temporal Analysis of Propagation Strategies
4.7. Keyword Co-Occurrence Network Analysis
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cardoso, A.; Laviola, B.G.; Santos, G.S.; de Sousa, H.U.; de Oliveira, H.B.; Veras, L.C.; Ciannella, R.; Favaro, S.P. Opportunities and challenges for sustainable production of A. aculeata through agroforestry systems. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 107, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- César, A.d.S.; Almeida, F.d.A.; de Souza, R.P.; Silva, G.C.; Atabani, A.E. The prospects of using Acrocomia aculeata (macaúba) a non-edible biodiesel feedstock in Brazil. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 49, 1213–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sant’Ana, C.T.S.; do Carmo, M.A.V.; Azevedo, L.; Costa, N.M.B.; Martino, H.S.D.; de Barros, F.A.R. Macauba (Acrocomia aculeata) pulp and kernel oils, and co-products: Chemical characterization and antioxidant properties. Ciência Rural 2025, 55, 16. [Google Scholar]
- Aleixo, D.T.; Gualberto, A.C.; Valle, A.B.D.S.; da Silva, L.C.; Ferreira, K.C.; Lemos, A.S.D.O.; Fabri, R.L.; Tavares, G.D.; Cazarim, M.S.; Gameiro, J.; et al. Macauba oil carried by polymeric micelles reduces migration and proliferation of triple-negative breast cancer cells. RSC Pharm. 2024, 1, 524–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerra, D.J.R.; Silva, C.W.; Nascimento, A.L.A.A.; Stringheta, P.C.; Moraes, M.N.; Lucia, C.M.D.; de Barros, F.A.R. Sustainable extraction of carotenoids from macauba pulp and press-cake: Use of ethyl acetate and ultrasound as optimization strategies. J. Food Sci. 2025, 90, e70030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergmann, J.; Tupinambá, D.; Costa, O.Y.; Almeida, J.R.; Barreto, C.; Quirino, B. Biodiesel production in Brazil and alternative biomass feedstocks. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, S.A. Study of Biodiesel Production from Oil Macaúba (Acrocomia aculeata) by Ethylic Route. Master’s Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, Lorena, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, L.N.; Cardoso, C.C.; Pasa, V.M.D. Production of Cold-Flow Quality Biodiesel from High-Acidity On-Edible Oils—Esterification and Transesterification of Macauba (Acrocomia aculeata) Oil Using Various Alcohols. BioEnergy Res. 2016, 9, 864–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benatti, G.S.S.; Buainain, A.M.; Cavalcante Filho, P.G.; Vargas-Carpintero, R.; Asveld, L.; Osseweijer, P. Macaw palm (Acrocomia spp.): An opportunity for including smallholders in Brazil’s biodiesel production. Clean. Circ. Bioecon. 2025, 10, 100134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motoike, S.Y.; Kuki, K.N. The Potential of Macaw Palm (Acrocomia aculeata) as Source of Biodiesel in Brazil. Int. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2009, 1, 632–635. [Google Scholar]
- Moreira, S.L.S.; Imbuzeiro, H.M.A.; dos Santos, R.A.F.; Silva, G.C.C.; Leite, H.G.; Pimentel, L.D.; Fernandes, R.B.A. Carbon accumulation in cultivated macauba trees can be estimated and projected using allometric equations. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 226, 120682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas-Carpintero, R.; Hilger, T.; Mössinger, J.; Souza, R.F.; Barroso Armas, J.C.; Tiede, K.; Lewandowski, I. Acrocomia spp.: Neglected crop, ballyhooed multipurpose palm or fit for the bioeconomy? A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 41, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colombo, C.A.; Chorfi Berton, L.H.; Diaz, B.G.; Ferrari, R.A. Macauba: A promising tropical palm for the production of vegetable oil. OCL 2018, 25, D108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nascimento, C.S.; dos Santos, V.L.; Andrade, M.H.C. Análise Da Produção De Protease E Lipase Por Fungos Filamentosos Isolados Do Fruto Da Macaúba (Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq) Lood. Ex Mart). Blucher Chem. Eng. Proc. 2015, 1, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Rubio Neto, A.; Silva, F.G.; Sales, J.D.F.; Reis, E.F.D.; Silva, M.V.V.D.; Souza, A.L. Effect of drying and soaking fruits and seeds on germination of macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata [Jacq.] Loddiges ex MART.). Acta Sci. Agron. 2012, 34, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, M.C.; Neves, D.G.A.; Bicalho, E.M.; Kuki, K.N.; Pereira, E.G. Assessing the feasibility of using Acrocomia aculeata (Arecaceae) for the rehabilitation of iron ore tailings. Acta Bot. Bras. 2024, 38, e20240072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henderson, A.; Galeano, G.; Bernal, R. Field Guide to the Palms of the Americas; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorenzi, H.; Noblick, L.R.; Kahn, F.; Ferreira, E. Flora Brasileira Lorenzi: Arecaceae (Palmeiras); Instituto Plantarum: Nova Odessa, SP, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Mazzottini-dos-Santos, H.C.; Ribeiro, L.M.; Oliveira, D.M.T. Structural changes in the micropylar region and over-coming dormancy in Cerrado palms seeds. Trees Struct. Funct. 2018, 32, 1415–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. The 17 Goals. United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals. 2023. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 13 January 2025).
- Motoike, S.Y.; Carvalho, M.; Pimentel, L.D.; Kuki, K.N.; Paes, J.M.V.; Dias, H.C.T.; Sato, A.Y. A Cultura da Macaúba: Implantação e Manejo de Cultivos Racionais; Universidade Federal de Viçosa: Viçosa, MG, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Lanes, É.C.M.; Motoike, S.Y.; Kuki, K.N.; Resende, M.D.V.; Caixeta, E.T. Mating System and Genetic Composition of the Macaw Palm (Acrocomia aculeata): Implications for Breeding and Genetic Conservation Programs. J. Hered. 2016, 107, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campidelli, M.L.L.; Rodrigues, R.A.; Magalhães, M.L.; Rocha, R.A.R.; Guimarães, J.P.M. Physicochemical composition and quality parameters of almond and macauba almond oil (Acrocomia aculeata (jacq.) lodd). Res. Soc. Dev. 2020, 9, e437997228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and, Evolution of Dormancy and Germination, 2nd ed; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, R.L.; Gorecki, M.J.; Renton, M.; Scott, J.K.; Colville, L.; Goggin, D.E.; Commander, L.E.; Westcott, D.A.; Cherry, H.; Finch-Savage, W.E. The ecophysiology of seed persistence: A mechanistic view of the journey to germination or de-mise. Biol. Rev. 2015, 90, 31–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakeman, R.J.; Small, J.L.; Torvell, L. Edaphic factors influence the longevity of seeds in the soil. Plant Ecol. 2012, 213, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, W.; Guimarães, M.F.; Lira, F.F.; Santos, J.V.F.; Takahashi, L.S.A.; Leal, A.C.; Coelho, G.T.C.P. Evaluation of two fruit ecotypes (totai and sclerocarpa) of macaúba (Acrocomia aculeata). Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 63, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, L.M.; Oliveira, D.M.T.; Garcia, Q.D. Structural evaluations of zygotic embryos and seedlings of the macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata, Arecaceae) during in vitro germination. Trees Struct. Funct. 2012, 26, 851–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, L.M.; Garcia, Q.S.; Oliveira, D.M.T.; Neves, S.C. Criteria for tetrazolium tests in the estimation of the germination potential of macaw palm. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2010, 45, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berton, L.H.C.; de Azevedo Filho, J.A.; Siqueira, W.J.; Colombo, C.A. Seed germination and estimates of genetic parameters of promising macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata) progenies for biofuel production. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 51, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bicalho, E.M.; Motoike, S.Y.; Borges, E.; Ataide, G.D.; Guimaraes, V.M. Enzyme activity and reserve mobilization during Macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata) seed germination. Acta Bot. Bras. 2016, 30, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, L.M.; Silva, P.O.; Andrade, I.G.; Garcia, Q.S. Interaction between embryo and adjacent tissues determines the dormancy in macaw palm seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 2013, 41, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Souza, P.P.; Motoike, S.Y.; Carvalho, M.; Kuki, K.N.; Borges, E.E.d.L.e.; Silva, A.M. Storage on the vigor and viability of macauba seeds from two provenances of Minas Gerais State. Ciência Rural 2016, 46, 1932–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade, A.P.D.S.; Motoike, S.Y.; Kuki, K.N.; de Queiroz, V.; Madeira, D.D.C.; Granja, M.M.C.; da Cruz, A.C.F.; Picoli, E.A.D.T.; Corrêa, T.R.; Rocha, D.I. Explant age and genotype drive the somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart. (Arecaceae), an alternative palm crop for oil production. Trees Struct. Funct. 2024, 38, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granja, M.M.C.; Motoike, S.Y.; Andrade, A.P.S.; Correa, T.R.; Picoli, E.A.T.; Kuki, K.N. Explant origin and culture media factors drive the somatic embryogenesis response in Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart., an emerging oil crop in the tropics. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 117, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meira, F.S.; Luis, Z.G.; Cardoso, I.; Scherwinski-Pereira, J.E. Somatic embryogenesis from leaf tissues of macaw palm [Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart.]. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2020, 92, e20180709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karim, S.K.A. An Overview of Oil Palm Cultivation via Tissue Culture Technique; IntechOpen: Londen, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lédo, A.S.; Vendrame, W.A. Coconut micropropagation and cryopreservation. Hortic. Rev. 2021, 48, 307–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, L.M.; Souza, P.P.; Rodrigues, A.G.; Oliveira, T.G.S.; Garcia, Q.S. Overcoming dormancy in macaw palm diaspores, a tropical species with potential for use as bio-fuel. Seed Sci. Technol. 2011, 39, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, L.M.; Garcia, Q.S.; Müller, M.; Munné-Bosch, S. Tissue-specific hormonal profiling during dormancy release in macaw palm seeds. Physiol. Plant. 2015, 153, 627–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, V.S.; Ribeiro, L.M.; Lopes, P.S.N.; Agostinho, C.O.; Matias, L.J.; Mercadante-Simões, M.O.; Correia, L.N.F. Dormancy is modulated by seed structures in palms of the cerrado biome. Aust. J. Bot. 2015, 63, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bicalho, E.M.; Pintó-Marijuan, M.; Morales, M.; Müller, M.; Munné-Bosch, S.; Garcia, Q.S. Control of macaw palm seed germination by the gibberellin/abscisic acid balance. Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 990–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues Junior, A.G.; Oliveira, T.G.S.; de Souza, P.P.; Ribeiro, L.M. Water uptake and pre-germination treatments in macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata—Arecaceae) seeds. J. Seed Sci. 2013, 35, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues Junior, A.G.; Oliveira, T.G.S.; de Souza, P.P.; Ribeiro, L.M. Temperature effects on Acrocomia aculeata seeds provide insights into overcoming dormancy in neotropical savanna palms. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2016, 223, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, J.N.E.; Agostinho, C.D.; Ribeiro, L.M.; Azevedo, A.M.; Lopes, P.S.N. Edaphic and climatic control of macauba palm seed bank dynamics. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 141, 111802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, J.N.E.; Mazzottini-dos-Santos, H.C.; Dias, D.S.; Lopes, P.S.N.; Ribeiro, L.M. Seasonality and the control of longevity and dormancy in macauba palm diaspores. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 177, 114475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazzo, B.R.; de Carvalho, L.M.; Carazzolle, M.F.; Pereira, G.A.G.; Colombo, C.A. Development of novel EST-SSR markers in the macaúba palm (Acrocomia aculeata) using transcriptome sequencing and cross-species transferability in Arecaceae species. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- CIF—Climate Investment Funds. Building a Sustainable Macauba-Based Silvopastoral System and Value Chain in Brazil. CIF-GDI DELIVERY CHALLENGE CASE STUDY. 2020, pp. 1–22. Available online: https://www.cif.org/sites/cif_enc/files/knowledge-documents/macauba-based_silvopastoral_system_and_value_chain_in_brazil_case_study.pdf (accessed on 18 January 2026).
- Andrade, V.; Casas, A.; Balslev, H.; Mora, F. The role of wild palms in agroforestry systems in the Neotropics: A review. People Nat. 2024, 6, 2200–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silveira, V.A.; de Paula, H.B.; Francelino, M.R.; Filpi, H.E.F.C.M.; Kuki, K.N.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Imbuzeiro, H.M.A. Agroclimatic referential for Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart. based on its diversity center in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Ciência Florest. 2023, 33, e64546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haupenthal, D.I.; Ojeda, M.M.; Viedma, L.Q.d.; Sorol, C.B. Primer reporte de Pestalotiopsis spp. en palmeras de Acrocomia aculeata en Paraguay. Agric. Technol. 2017, 2, 41–48. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14066/3467 (accessed on 10 March 2025).
- da Motta, P.E.F.; Curi, N.; de Oliveira-Filho, A.T.; Gomes, J.B.V. Occurrence of macaúba in Minas Gerais, Brazil: Rela-tionship with climatic, pedological and vegetation attributes. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2002, 37, 1023–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández, C.F.; Lezcano, M.I.D.; Segnana, L.R.G. Rooting in vitro of zygotic embryos of Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd ex Mart. Colomb. For. 2016, 19, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Broschat, T.K.; Elliott, M.L.; Hodel, D.R. Ornamental Palms: Biology and Horticulture. In Horticultural Reviews; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; Volume 42, pp. 1–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, S.A.D.N.; Gentil, D.F.d.O. Extraction, imbibition and germination of Astrocatyum aculeatum seeds. Acta Amaz. 2006, 36, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soares, J.D.R.; Rodrigues, F.A.; Pasqual, M.; Nunes, C.F.; Araujo, A.G.D. Germination and early growth of embryos of macaúba seedlings. Ciência Rural 2011, 41, 773–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beveridge, F.C.; Kalaipandian, S.; Yang, C.; Adkins, S.W. Fruit Biology of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). Plants 2022, 11, 3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, L.M.; Oliveira, T.G.S.; Carvalho, V.S.; Silva, P.O.; Neves, S.C.; Garcia, Q.S. The behaviour of macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata) seeds during storage. Seed Sci. Technol. 2012, 40, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, T.G.S.; Rodrigues, A.G.; de Souza, P.P.; Ribeiro, L.M. Use of phytoregulators in overcoming macaw palm seed dormancy. Acta Sci. 2013, 35, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubio Neto, A.; Silva, F.G.; Sales, J.F.; dos Reis, E.F.; Silva, L.Q.; Campos, R.C. Dormancy breaking in macaw palm [Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Loddiges ex Mart.] seeds. Acta Sci. Agron. 2014, 36, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bewley, J.D.; Bradford, K.J.; Hilhorst, H.W.M.; Nonogaki, H. Dormancy and the Control of Germination. In Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 247–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, C.C.; Machado, C.G.; Caldas, I.G.R.; Vieira, I.G. Vermiculite as substrate for germination of ‘barbatimão’ seeds. Ciência Florest. 2011, 21, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borcioni, E.; Negrelle, R.R.B. Application of analogue brassinosteroide (Biobras 16®) germination and growth in vitro culture of zygotic embryos and acclimatization of bocaiuva. Ciência Rural 2012, 42, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Costa, E.; Martins, R.F.; Faria, T.A.C.; Jorge, M.H.A.; Leal, P.A.M. Seedlings of Acrocomia aculeata in Different Substrates and Protected Environments. Eng. Agric. 2014, 34, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luis, Z.G.; Scherwinski-Pereira, J.E. A simple and efficient protocol for the cryopreservation of zygotic embryos of macaw palm [Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart.], a tropical species with a capacity for biofuel production. Cryoletters 2017, 38, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
- Resende, R.T.; Kuki, K.N.; Corrêa, T.R.; Zaidan, Ú.R.; Mota, P.H.S.; Telles, L.A.A.; Gonzales, D.G.E.; Motoike, S.Y.; Resende, M.D.V.; Leite, H.G.; et al. Data-based agroecological zoning of Acrocomia aculeata: GIS modeling and ecophysiological aspects into a Brazilian representative occurrence area. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 154, 112749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandeira, F.S.; Xavier, A.; Lani, E.R.G.; Otoni, W.C. In vitro germination of mature zygotic embryos of macaw palm influenced by storage temperature of the fruits and sucrose concentrations. Rev. Árvore 2013, 37, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, T.D. The role of activated charcoal in plant tissue culture. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26, 618–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padilha, J.H.D.; Ribas, L.L.F.; Amano, É.; Quoirin, M. Somatic embryogenesis in Acrocomia aculeata Jacq. (Lodd.) ex Mart using the thin cell layer technique. Acta Bot. Bras. 2015, 29, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Meira, F.S.; Luis, Z.G.; Silva-Cardoso, I.M.D.; Scherwinski-Pereira, J.E. Developmental pathway of somatic embryogenesis from leaf tissues of macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata) revealed by histological events. Flora 2019, 250, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, J.N.E.; Ribeiro, L.M.; Mercadante-Simoes, M.O. Ontogenesis and functions of saxophone stem in Acrocomia aculeata (Arecaceae). Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moura, E.F.; Motoike, S.Y.; Ventrella, M.C.; Júnior, A.Q.d.S.; Carvalho, M. Somatic embryogenesis in macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata) from zygotic embryos. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 119, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moura, E.F.; Ventrella, M.C.; Motoike, S.Y.; Júnior, A.Q.d.S.; Carvalho, M.; Manfio, C.E. Histological study of somatic embryogenesis induction on zygotic embryos of macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Martius). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2008, 95, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eeuwens, C.J. Mineral Requirements for Growth and Callus Initiation of Tissue Explants Excised from Mature Coconut Palms (Cocos nucifera) and Cultured in vitro. Physiol. Plant. 1976, 36, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisinger, W.R.; Morré, D.J. Growth-regulating properties of picloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Bot. 1971, 49, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Mello, T.; Zanardo, T.É.C.; Silva, T.D.; Costa, J.S.; Fagundes, D.P.; de Araujo, C.P.; Hegedus, C.E.N.; dos Anjos, B.B.; Schmildt, E.R.; Ferreira, A.; et al. Chronological age, changes in DNA methylation, and endogenous hormone levels of explants promote somatic embryogenesis of Euterpe edulis Martius. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2024, 157, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalaipandian, S.; Mu, Z.; Kong, E.Y.Y.; Biddle, J.; Cave, R.; Bazrafshan, A.; Wijayabandara, K.; Beveridge, F.C.; Nguyen, Q.; Adkins, S.W. Cloning coconut via somatic embryogenesis: A review of the current status and future prospects. Plants 2021, 10, 2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, R.S.; Vale, E.d.M.; Heringer, A.S.; Santa-Catarina, C.; Silveira, V. Putrescine induces somatic embryo development and proteomic changes in embryogenic callus of sugarcane. J. Proteom. 2016, 130, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulus, D.; Woźny, A. Influence of light conditions on the morphogenetic and biochemical response of selected ornamental plant species under in vitro conditions: A mini-review. BioTechnologia 2020, 101, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Posit Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R; Posit Software; PBC: Boston, MA, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Disinfestation | Dormancy Overcoming | Substrates Types | Temperature (°C) | Light Conditions | Duration Time | Main Results | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium hypochlorite (5%) | Operculum removal | Vermiculite and iron ore tailings | 25 | Photoperiod of 12 h | 56 days | Seed germination rates were 65% in iron ore tailings and 68% in vermiculite | [16] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (6%) | Operculum removal | Vermiculite | Germinators adjusted to 20, 25, 30, 35, or 40 °C. After 30 days, all treatments were transferred to 30 °C. | Not informed | 60 days | For seeds without an operculum, germination at 60 days ranged from 70% to 90%, with no significant difference among treatments. | [45] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (6%) | Operculum removal | Vermiculite | 30 | Dark | 21 days | ±80% germination rate | [19] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (6%) | GA3 (2000 mg L−1) | Vermiculite | 30 | Dark | 60 days | 60% of germination | [19] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (5%) | Operculum removal + GA3 (0.5%) | Blotting paper | 27 | Not informed | 29 days | 80% of germination | [31] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (6%) | Stratification at 35 °C for 60 days | Vermiculite | 30 | Not informed | 12 weeks | 25% of germination | [44] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (5%) | Operculum removal + GA3 (0.5%) | Germitest® paper | 28 | Dark | 30 days | Best seed conservation occurred at 6–8% moisture, with germination declining from ±60% to 40% over 12 months at room temperature | [33] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (5%) | Operculum removal + GA3 (0.5%) | Germitest® paper | 28 | Dark | 30 days | 82.66% of germination and 2.23 of GSI were obtained at 20 °C and 55% RH | [33] |
| Absolute ethyl alcohol + sodium hypochlorite (2.5%) | Operculum removal + GA3 (100 mg L−1) | Blotting paper | 35 | Not informed | 28 days | 13.75% of germination | [27] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (6%) | GA3 (2000 mg L−1) | Vermiculite | 30 | Photoperiod of 12 h | 21 weeks | 37% of germination | [42] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (6%) | Operculum removal | Vermiculite | 30 | Dark | 15 days | 86% of germination | [40] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (6%) | Operculum removal + soaking in water for 96 h | Vermiculite | 30 | Not informed | 8 days | 60% of germination | [41] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (6%) | GA3 (2000 mg L−1) for 24 h | Vermiculite | 30 | Not informed | 60 days | 20% of germination | [41] |
| Sodium hypochlorite (5%) | Operculum removal + GA3 (1000 mg L−1) | Vermiculite | 30 | Not informed | 84 days | ±59.07% of germination | [30] |
| Chlorine solution (6%) | Operculum removal + GA3 (0, 2000 or 5000 mg L−1) | Vermiculite | 30 | Not informed | 18 weeks | Opercular tegument removal yielded the highest germination (35%), independent of GA3. In intact opercular teguments, GA3 increased germination from 15% (control, without GA3) to 25%. | [59] |
| Not informed | Soaking times for seeds in water (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 days) | Germitest® paper | 30 | Not informed | Not informed | Germination and GSI decreased with increasing soaking time, from 10% and 0.06 (day 0) to 2.5% and 0.03 after 10 days of imbibition | [15] |
| Chlorine solution (6%) | Pyrenes pre-soaking in GA3 (≥100 mg L−1) for 24 h or soaking in water at 40 °C for 12 h | Clay soil + sand | 25 | Not informed | 13 months | Proved to be simple and effective procedures for production of seedlings | [39] |
| Chlorine solution (6%) | Operculum removal + GA3 (2000 mg L−1) soaking for 24 h followed by a repeated GA3 application after 4 weeks | Vermiculite | 30 | Not informed | 126 days | >50% of germination within eight weeks | [39] |
| Pre-Germination | Disinfection Protocol | Explant | Culture Medium | AC (g L−1) | PGR | T (°C) | Light Condition | Period | Main Results | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | Not informed | Embryos | MS 75% + organic substances | 0 | Without | 30 | Dark | 30 days | 100% of viable embryos (i.e., capable of elongation) | [45] |
| Without | Not informed | Embryos | MS 75% | 3 | Without | 30 | Dark | 30 days | 89% embryo viability and 80% of vigor | [45] |
| Embryos hydrated for 15 h (60% moisture) followed by 6 h desiccation (11% moisture) prior to cryopreservation | Seeds: Alcohol (70%) + Sodium hypochlorite (2.5%) | Embryos | Modified Y3 | 2.5 | Without | 25 ± 2 | Dark for 30 days followed by 16 h photoperiod | >30 days | 81% (1 h) and 75% (360 days) germination post-cryopreservation, with no significant difference | [65] |
| Heat treatment (temperature regimes: 35, 40, 20/30, 18/35 °C) or maintained at room temperature (±22 °C) | Embryos: Chlorine solution (0.5%) | Embryos | MS 100% | 3 | Without | 30 | Dark | 30 days | The initial embryo elongation rate (control) was 95.8%. Embryo elongation over time at 25, 20/30, and 18/35 °C was similar to the control, but decreased at 35 °C after 60 days and at 40 °C after 15 days | [44] |
| Without | Seeds: Alcohol (90%) + Sodium hypochlorite (20%) | Embryos | MS 100% | 2 | BAP (1 pmm) | 25 | Dark for 20 days followed by 16 h photoperiod | 40 days | 5 to 6 cm of root growth | [53] |
| Different storage conditions (fruits stored in the shade at room temperature (27 ± 2 °C) or in a cold chamber (12–15 °C) in the dark) for 30 days | Embryos: Sodium hypochlorite (1%) with Tween 20® | Embryos | MS 100% with different concentration of sucrose (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 g L−1) | 2 | Without | 27 | Dark for 30 days followed by 16 h photoperiod | 90 days | 84% of germination with room-temperature fruit storage. Highest germination (82%) and embryo-to-seedling conversion (42%) at 30 g L−1 sucrose. | [67] |
| Without | Seeds: Sodium hypochlorite (6%) Embryos: Ascorbic acid solution (100 mg L−1) + Chlorine solution (0.5%) | Embryos (control), embryo + tegument, and embryo + endosperm | MS 75% | 6 | Without | 30 | Dark | 30 days | Embryos cultivation in contact with seed structures appeared to have no effect on their germination or development | [32] |
| Embryos | MS 75% | 6 | GA3 (0 mg L−1) | 30 | Dark for 30 days followed by 12 h photoperiod | 30 days | 87% of the embryos showed cotyledonary petiole elongation | [32] | ||
| Stored in a cold-chamber at 10 °C for one full year | Seeds: Chlorine solution (6%) | Embryos | MS 75% | 3 | Without | 30 | Dark | 30 days | 85% of embryo viability | [58] |
| Without | Seeds: Sodium hypochlorite (1%) Embryos: Sodium hypochlorite (0.5%) with Tween 20® | Embryos | WPM 100% | 1 | Biobras 16® (0.5 mg L−1) | 25 | Dark for 30 days followed by 16 h photoperiod | 90 days | 80% of germination and 53.1% of normal seedlings | [63] |
| Without | Embryos: Commercial sodium hypochlorite (20%) | Embryos | MS (50 and 100%) + Coconut water (0, 50, 100 and 150 mL L−1) | 3 | Without | 25 | 16 h photoperiod | 90 days | Highest germination (95.6%) after 60 days regardless of medium composition; highest proportion of normal seedlings (83%) obtained with 50% MS + 50 mL L−1 coconut water. | [56] |
| Without | Embryos: Ascorbic acid solution (100 ppm) + Chlorine solution (0.25%) | Embryos | MS 75% | 3 | Without | 30 | Dark | 30 days | Germination ranged from 38–68% in embryos with 7.9% water content to 82–96% in embryos with 20.4% water content | [29] |
| Explant Type | Disinfection Protocol | Culture Medium | Activated Charcoal | PGR | Temperature (°C) | Light Conditions | Duration Time | Main Results | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immature and unexpanded leaves (2-year-old explants) | Sodium hypochlorite (1%) | Y3 | 0 g | Picloram (18 and 36 μM) | 27 ± 1 | Dark | 90 days | 40% callus production | [34] |
| Immature and unexpanded leaves | Alcohol (70%) + Sodium hypochlorite (1.5%) | modified Y3 with Fe-EDTA + vitamins of MS | 2.5 g L−1 | Picloram (450 μM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | 9 months | 64.9% callus production | [36] |
| Immature and unexpanded leaves | Alcohol (70%) + Sodium hypochlorite (2.5%) | Y3 + vitamins of MS | 2.5 g L−1 | Picloram (450 μM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | 180 days | There was callus formation, but the percentage was not reported | [71] |
| Zygotic embryos | Seeds: Commercial detergent + Sodium hypochlorite (2.5%) Zygotic embryo: Sodium hypochlorite (0.1%) | Y3 | 0 g | Picloram (9 μM) + 2iP (0.9 μM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | 90 days | 46% callus production | [35] |
| Immature and unexpanded leaves (12-week old seedlings) | Seeds: Alcohol (70%) + Sodium hypochlorite (6%) with 0.1% Tween 20® | Y3 | 1.5 g L−1 | Picloram (150 and 300 µM) | Not informed | Dark | 12 weeks | >55% callus production | [70] |
| Zygotic embryos | Seeds: Detertec (50%) + Mercuric chloride (0.01%) + Sodium hypochlorite (6%) | Y3 | 0 g | 2,4-D (9 μM) + TDZ (1 mM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | 60 days | 61.9% callus production | [73] |
| Y3 | 0 g | Picloram (9 μM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | 60 days | 47% callus production | |||
| Zygotic embryos | Y3 | 0 g | Picloram (9 μM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | 60 days | 75 ± 4.5% callus production | [74] |
| Microprop. Stage | Culture Medium | Activated Charcoal | PGR | Temperature (°C) | Light Conditions | Duration Time | Main Results | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Callus multiplication | Y3 | 0 g | Picloram (18 μM) + putrescine (1 mM) | 27 ± 1 | Dark | 180 days | 93.75% somatic embryo formation | [34] |
| modified Y3 with Fe-EDTA and vitamins of MS | 2.5 g L−1 | Picloram (450 μM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | 4 months | Increment of 5.81 times the initial calli mass; Asynchronic formation of somatic embryos | [36] | |
| Y3 with vitamins of MS | 2.5 g L−1 | Picloram (450 μM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | Not informed | Formation of somatic embryos | [71] | |
| MS | 0 g | Picloram (18 μM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | 45 days | Asynchronic formation of somatic embryos | [35] | |
| Y3 | 0.3 g L−1 | Picloram (75 μM) | Not informed | Light | 8 weeks | Formation of nodular calli with embryogenic clusters | [70] | |
| Somatic embryo induction | Y3 | 3.0 g L−1 | Picloram (9 μM) | 25 ± 2 | 16 h photoperiod | 120 days | 9% somatic embryo production | [73] |
| Y3 | 0 g | Picloram (9 μM) | 25 ± 2 | Dark | 120 days | 59.9 ± 10% somatic embryo formation with multicellular origin aspect, but shared the protoderm with the mother tissue | [74] | |
| Y3 | 3.0 g L−1 | Picloram (9 μM) | 25 ± 2 | 16 h photoperiod | 120 days | 9 ± 3.5% somatic embryo formation with unicellular origin aspect | [74] | |
| Somatic embryo maturation | MS | 3.0 g L−1 | 2iP (2.5 μM) + NAA (5.5 μM) + putrescine (1000 μM) | 25 ± 2 | 16 h photoperiod | 60 days | 28.08% of regenerated somatic embryos and 4.665% of pre-germinated embryo | [35] |
| Y3 | 0 g | Picloram (75 μM) + 2iP (12.5 μM) | Not informed | Light | 4 weeks | 24% of the callus produced somatic embryos, with an average of 38 somatic embryos per nodular callus | [70] | |
| Somatic embryo germination/regeneration | Y3 | 3.0 g L−1 | 2,4-D (0.1 µM) + putrescine (1 mM) | 27 ± 1 | Dark for 60 days and, then, 16 h photoperiod | 60 days | 100% of somatic embryos were converted into plantlets with well-developed shoots and roots | [34] |
| Y3 | 2.5 g L−1 | Without PGR | 25 ± 2 | Ligh | >1 month | Germinating somatic embryos went into senescence and died after a few weeks of germination | [36] | |
| MS | 0 g | 2iP (0.25 μM) + GA3 (0.55 μM) + putrescine (1000 μM) | 30 ± 2 | 16 h photoperiod | 60 days | 14.938% of germinated somatic embryos (after 30 days); Plantlets’ regeneration was defective (after 60 days) | [35] | |
| Y3 | 1.0 g L−1 | Without PGR | 25 ± 2 | Light | 8 weeks | 18% of somatic embryos converted into plants but did not survive acclimation | [70] | |
| Y3 | 3.0 g L−1 | Without PGR | 25 ± 2 | 16 h photoperiod | 30 days | 49.3% of the somatic embryos started germination, but only few embryos completed the germination; Plantlets appeared to be normal with growing roots and shoots | [73] | |
| Y3 | 3.0 g L−1 | Without PGR | 25 ± 2 | 16 h photoperiod | 15 days | 50 ± 5% of the somatic embryo with unicellular origin aspect germinated | [74] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Cavalcanti, V.P.; Braga, L.d.S.; da Costa, A.C.A.F.; de Jesus, J.V.M.; Ribeiro Junior, J.B.; dos Santos, H.O.; Castro, R.P.; dos Santos, A.F.; Dória, J. Macaw Palm Propagation Strategies: Advances, Gaps, and Future Directions for a Promising Oleaginous Crop—A Review. Plants 2026, 15, 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030488
Cavalcanti VP, Braga LdS, da Costa ACAF, de Jesus JVM, Ribeiro Junior JB, dos Santos HO, Castro RP, dos Santos AF, Dória J. Macaw Palm Propagation Strategies: Advances, Gaps, and Future Directions for a Promising Oleaginous Crop—A Review. Plants. 2026; 15(3):488. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030488
Chicago/Turabian StyleCavalcanti, Vytória Piscitelli, Laís da Silva Braga, Anna Carolina Abreu Francisco da Costa, José Victor Maurício de Jesus, Jorge Braga Ribeiro Junior, Heloisa Oliveira dos Santos, Rafael Peron Castro, Adão Felipe dos Santos, and Joyce Dória. 2026. "Macaw Palm Propagation Strategies: Advances, Gaps, and Future Directions for a Promising Oleaginous Crop—A Review" Plants 15, no. 3: 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030488
APA StyleCavalcanti, V. P., Braga, L. d. S., da Costa, A. C. A. F., de Jesus, J. V. M., Ribeiro Junior, J. B., dos Santos, H. O., Castro, R. P., dos Santos, A. F., & Dória, J. (2026). Macaw Palm Propagation Strategies: Advances, Gaps, and Future Directions for a Promising Oleaginous Crop—A Review. Plants, 15(3), 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030488

