Next Article in Journal
Editorial for the Special Issue “Metabolic Analysis of Plant Development and Defense Responses”
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Grapevines to Downy Mildew Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Autotoxicity and Allelopathy on Seedling Growth in Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Semiochemical-Mediated Host-Searching and Biological Control Potential of Trichogramma Wasps: Mechanisms, Behavioral Plasticity, and Pest Management Applications

1
Agricultural College, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin 132101, China
2
Imdaad: Integrated Facilities Management Company, Street Number 1100, South Zone Jebel Ali, Dubai P.O. Box 18220, United Arab Emirates
3
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Agricultural Pest Management of the Mountainous Region, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2026, 15(12), 1918; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15121918 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 February 2026 / Revised: 4 June 2026 / Accepted: 12 June 2026 / Published: 21 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Chemical Ecology—2nd Edition)

Simple Summary

Trichogramma Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) is considered the most effective biological control agent because it parasitizes insect pest eggs. This parasitoid uses plant- and host-derived chemical cues to locate a host and parasitize it. Furthermore, this parasitoid’s innate behavior enables it to precisely identify hosts across various developmental stages. However, Trichogramma’s host-seeking ability is disrupted in the absence of semiochemicals. Furthermore, Trichogramma’s ability to use associative learning is central to its adaptability and success in pest control.

Abstract

Globally, Trichogramma Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) is known as the most effective biological control agent due to its ability to parasitize insect pest eggs. However, identifying an appropriate host is vital for Trichogramma to prosper. Therefore, this study delves into the complex role of semiochemicals in shaping the host-seeking behavior of Trichogramma parasitoids, with a particular focus on their responses to both plant-derived and host-derived cues. The mechanism of semiochemical reception in Trichogramma wasps relies on a highly specialized, sensitive olfactory and gustatory system to locate host eggs and mates. Semiochemicals, which mediate ecological interactions, have been identified as pivotal in influencing the parasitic efficiency of Trichogramma species. Trichogramma’s host-seeking behavior is influenced not solely by ovipositional cues but also by the intrinsic physical attributes of Lepidopteran hosts, such as the scales on the wings and abdomen, which emit semiochemicals capable of eliciting positive chemotactic responses, thereby guiding parasitoids toward optimal sites for oviposition. Furthermore, the interplay between insect-derived and plant-derived chemical cues exhibits a synergistic effect, collectively enhancing the chemotactic attraction of Trichogramma, thereby fine-tuning its host-seeking behavior with greater precision and specificity. This study further underscores Trichogramma’s innate behavioral ability to discriminate between host eggs of varying developmental stages, facilitating the precise identification and selection of the most suitable host for parasitization. Age and experience both make Trichogramma more selective of hosts, but younger parasitoids may take a broader approach to host selection due to their greater life expectancy. Furthermore, the removal of these cues affects their host localization and learning abilities. Associative learning enables Trichogramma to exhibit flexible behaviors, providing them with a selective advantage; allows them to explore various hosts; and reduces environmental uncertainty. Plant structure, host density, and host age are the key factors that significantly influence the foraging and parasitism of Trichogramma. The searching speed of this parasitoid is significantly influenced by temperature. Heat stress increases VOC emissions in plants such as potato via stomatal opening, reducing herbivore attraction and enhancing parasitoid recruitment. Furthermore, air pollution, including CO2, O3, and NOx, impairs parasitoid efficiency by disrupting volatile-mediated host location and reducing biological control performance. Trichogramma wasps are generally effective biological control agents, but their success depends on the species used, target pest, crop, release density, and field conditions. Overall, species such as T. ostriniae, T. japonicum, and T. leucaniae show the strongest performance in several crops by increasing parasitism, reducing pest damage, and improving yield. This study highlights the successful integration of semiochemical cues in pest management programs and the effective utilization of Trichogramma in conjunction with entomopathogenic bacteria to control Lepidopteran pests. This approach contributes to the development of more effective pest management strategies, thereby promoting agricultural sustainability.

1. Introduction

The search for suitable hosts is a critical aspect of the parasitic behavior exhibited by Trichogramma wasps [1,2,3,4,5]. This behavior is governed largely by semiochemicals—volatile organic compounds that facilitate ecological interactions and host detection [6,7,8,9]. The members of the genus Trichogramma Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) are recognized worldwide as the most promising biological control agents for the sustainable management of agricultural insect pests [10]. Trichogramma is the largest genus in the family Trichogrammatidae, with approximately 620 species documented globally [11]. This genus accounts for over one-quarter of the known genera in this family, with the highest numbers of known species in Brazil, China, India, Russia, and the USA [11]. In China, Trichogramma dendrolimi, Trichogramma ostriniae, Trichogramma confusum, Trichogramma evanescens, and Trichogramma japonicum are the most commonly occurring Trichogramma species, exhibiting an overlapping distribution, and they are employed in mass rearing for release against insect pests [11]. Haoxiang, Xiaoqing [12] declared that T. dendrolimi and T. chilonis are “good regulators” of fall armyworm outbreaks in central and northeastern China. Trichogramma parasitoids, which are crucial biological control agents in pest management [13,14], rely on both plant-derived and host-derived chemical cues to locate their hosts [15,16,17]. These cues include a wide range of substances, from plant volatiles induced by herbivore damage to sex pheromones emitted by host insects [18,19,20].
Recent studies have demonstrated that the attraction of Trichogramma to these chemical signals is age-dependent, with females at varying stages of maturation exhibiting different levels of sensitivity to these cues [21]. Additionally, the removal of chemical cues from host eggs, such as through rinsing, significantly affects Trichogramma’s ability to localize hosts [22]. These age-related and chemical cue-mediated responses highlight the complex relationship between parasitoid behavior and the semiochemicals involved.
As semiochemicals directly impact parasitoid efficiency, understanding these mechanisms offers valuable insights into enhancing pest control strategies. This study investigates the role of chemical cues in Trichogramma’s host detection capabilities, aiming to improve our understanding of the ecological dynamics driving their behavior and ultimately contribute to more effective biological pest control methods.

2. Review Methodology

A comprehensive literature search was performed running a query comprising keywords and Booleans, namely, (“Trichogramma”) AND (“Chemotaxis” OR “Host detection”) AND (“Semiochemicals” OR “Plant-derived cues” OR “Host-derived cues”), across multiple databases, e.g., Google Scholar, PubMed and ScienceDirect. A range of peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2026 was retrieved, and these articles underwent a systematic selection process following the PRISMA guidelines [23].
A total of 2211 records were identified, of which 1881 remained after duplicate removal. Screening based on titles and abstracts resulted in 876 records being retained for further assessment. During the eligibility stage, 724 records were excluded because they did not provide sufficient detail relevant to the objectives of this review. These excluded records mentioned Trichogramma only briefly, lacked information on chemotaxis or host-detection behavior, did not report plant-derived or host-derived semiochemical cues, provided no experimental evidence of parasitoid responses to chemical cues, or were conference proceedings and abstracts with insufficient methodological detail. Finally, 152 records met the inclusion criteria and were used for data extraction in this review (Figure 1). The clustering and co-occurrence of the keywords of the selected articles, analyzed using VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), are depicted in Figure 2. A total of 1003 keywords were distributed across nine distinct clusters, with the most frequently occurring keywords being semiochemicals, pheromones, biological control, integrated pest management, kairomones, infochemicals, chemical communication, parasitoid, volatiles, and chemotaxis.Additionally bibliometric parameters included the number of publications in respective years affiliated with the authors of considered articles. About 53.950% of the selected articles were published between 2020 and 2026, indicative of the advancements in the research on this topic (Figure 3). The literature retrieved from the selected databases focused on the semiochemical perception mechanisms in Trichogramma wasps, including the impact of chemical cues on chemotaxis, host-searching behavior, and parasitism, as well as the role of plant-derived semiochemicals and environmental factors like plant complexity and host density. Additionally, the illustrations presented in this review were created using BioRender (BioRender.com).

3. Mechanisms of Semiochemical Perception in Trichogramma Wasps

The mechanism of semiochemical reception in Trichogramma wasps relies on a highly specialized, sensitive olfactory and gustatory system to locate host eggs and mates [24]. The complex chemosensory system is composed of multiple chemosensory proteins, including odorant receptors (ORs), gustatory receptors (GRs), and ionotropic receptors (IRs) [25]. A transcriptomic analysis of male and female heads of T. japonicum revealed that the differentially expressed genes are primarily associated with chemosensory function. There are sixty-six chemosensory receptor genes, namely, fifty-one ORs, seven IRs, and eight GRs [24]. These genes are more highly expressed in female heads than male heads, likely due to the increased need for females to search for hosts or detect male pheromones [24]. ORs, GRs, and IRs are located in the dendritic membrane of ORNs and are regarded as key factors in the chemosensory signal transduction process [26]. ORs are proteins with a seven-transmembrane domain that function as heterogeneous ion channels composed of a traditional odor receptor (OR) and an odorant receptor co-receptor (ORco). The OR is capable of recognizing odor molecules and pheromones, and it is a highly conserved odorant receptor. However, ORco does not perceive odor molecules and is co-expressed with traditional ORs [27], with which it interacts to form ligand-gated ion channels, enhancing the odor response [28]. GRs exhibit a similar membrane structure to ORs but are distantly related to ORs in the G-protein-coupled receptor family and are principally expressed in gustatory receptor neurons [29]. IRs are a specialized, ancient subfamily of ligand-gated ion channels, divergent from inotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs), that function primarily as chemosensory receptors in insects [30]. Zhang, Jiang [31] identified one-hundred ORs, twenty-seven GRs, and twenty-seven IRs in the genome of T. dendrolimi.

4. Pheromone and Egg Surface Volatiles as Semiochemical Signals Guiding Trichogramma Host Detection

Semiochemicals constitute a diverse class of signaling chemicals that mediate interactions between living organisms, directing their behavior and making changes within them [32]. These chemicals, produced by plants, insects, or microbes, convey critical information that influences insect movement, aggregation, mating, oviposition, and foraging activities [33]. Insects, particularly those in the Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) and Coleoptera (beetles) orders, secrete a vast array of semiochemicals, with their sex pheromones and aggregation pheromones being the most extensively studied and utilized for communication [34,35]. Ouaba, Tchuinkam [36] declared that Lepidoptera is the second most diverse pest insect order after Coleoptera, with more than 178,159 species described in more than 4000 genera worldwide. Lepidopteran pests cause damage to cultivated crops and other production systems, resulting in significant economic losses, mainly pronounced in cereal crops (millet, maize, rice, and sorghum), horticultural crops (cabbage, green beans, sweet potatoes, and tomatoes), and honey production in Cameroon [36]. During a previous light trap study conducted in China [37], the majority of insect pests captured were from the order Lepidoptera, highlighting their dominance in nocturnal pest populations and the importance of targeting these groups in pest management strategies. Semiochemicals are behavior-modifying compounds, including pheromones, that can attract or disrupt the mating of insects, allowing them to communicate in ways invisible to humans [38].
Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a highly destructive polyphagous pest of more than 350 plant species from at least 76 plant families worldwide [39,40]. The female moth lays 100–180 dome-shaped eggs in clusters on leaves, secured with adhesive secretions and covered with protective barbed hairs [41]. These protective substances on their eggs have been recorded as semiochemicals, such as kairomones for Trichogramma, which influence the chemotactic behavior of this parasitoid [42]. The scales on S. frugiperda eggs, wings, and abdomen release volatiles, including acetates, alcohols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, hydrocarbons, and ketones [42]. However, Trichogramma pretiosum actively attracts two acetate compounds, (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14:OAC) and (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate (Z11-16:OAC), compared to others. Furthermore, T. pretiosum exhibits positive chemotaxis that varies with pheromone concentration in such a way that, in a previous study, it was found that wasps could recognize Z9-14:OAC at all three tested concentrations (1, 0.1, and 0.01 µg µL−1), while Z11-16:OAC was attractive only at very low levels (0.1 and 0.01 µg µL−1). This difference was attributed to olfactory binding proteins (OBPs) in the antennal sensilla [43], which are responsible for intercepting chemical molecules and transducing this signal to the sensilla nerve endings [44]. A higher number of OBPs tuned to Z9-14:OAC likely enables consistent detection across a wide range of doses. In contrast, fewer OBPs are capable of recognizing Z11-16:OAC. Consequently, higher concentrations of this compound can saturate these proteins, preventing effective signal transmission and resulting in the observed lack of response. The results show that the chemotactic behavior of Trichogramma is shaped by the specificity of OBPs to certain semiochemicals, influencing host detection efficiency. Recently, Kong, Zhang [45] also identified a key OBP that is highly expressed in the female head of T. ostriniae and exhibits high and broad affinity for both host sex pheromones ((Z)-12:14AC and (E)-12:14AC) and egg surface volatiles. Future studies should focus on identifying these OBPs and their interactions. Additionally, RNAi-mediated silencing of OBPs could be applied to enhance biological control strategies using semiochemical-based tools.

5. Plant-Derived Volatile Cues in Trichogramma Host Location and Egg Selection

Semiochemicals play a crucial role in shaping the host-seeking behavior of Trichogramma egg parasitoids [22]. These chemical cues influence the various stages of the host utilization process, including habitat location, host location, and host acceptance [46]. In Trichogramma, host-search behavior is guided by well-established semiochemical cues, including both plant volatiles and host-derived chemicals [9]. Among these, herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) have been shown to be particularly effective in attracting parasitoids to suitable hosts. For instance, Trichogramma achaeae females are innately attracted to the volatiles produced by tomato plants, regardless of infestation status [9]. However, oviposition and larval feeding by the pest Tuta absoluta significantly enhance HIPV emission, potentially improving parasitoid attraction [9]. Host sex pheromones can also influence Trichogramma behavior, as demonstrated by T. achaeae’s attraction to T. absoluta’s sex pheromones [9]. In addition to semiochemicals alone, the blends of volatiles also provide cues in Trichogramma host-seeking in such a way that anisole and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate volatiles emitted by host eggs (Helicoverpa zea) and infested plants (Crotalaria juncea infested with H. zea), respectively, synergistically attract Trichogramma papilionis even at long distances, ultimately optimizing and improving their search strategy [47]. A recent study [48] also rejected the traditional thought that Trichogramma only uses contact cues, i.e., direct physical or chemical interaction with host eggs, to assess their quality. The authors found that wasps assess host egg quality from a distance, using volatile cues emitted by the plants on which the eggs are carried. An olfactometer assay was conducted to assess the preference of T. japonicum for plant volatiles emitted by rice plants bearing eggs of different ages (1–4 days) of the rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, compared with volatiles from uninfested rice plants. [48]. The results indicated that wasps were significantly more attracted by the odor (D-limonene and α-pinene volatiles) of the rice plants carrying the 2-day-old eggs of C. medinalis [48]. This is because the genes OsTPS19 and OsTPS20, which are localized in subcellular compartments in rice tissues, play a significant role in targeting plastids for terpene biosynthesis, with the highest expression observed in plants with 2-day-old embryos (Figure 4) [48]. Furthermore, rice plants without eggs, as well as those with eggs of varying ages, were not particularly appealing to the female Trichogramma due to a decreased amount of terpenes released by both the host and the plants [48]. T. japonicum exhibits an innate ability to discriminate among host eggs by exploiting plant-derived volatiles, particularly α-pinene and D-limonene, which reliably signal the presence and suitability of 2-day-old eggs [48]. This strategy allows the wasp to optimize offspring performance while minimizing foraging costs, reflecting a finely tuned evolutionary adaptation with direct implications for sustainable pest management.

6. Plant-Derived Semiochemicals and Their Impact on Trichogramma Behavior

Plant cues, particularly volatile organic compounds, are vital mediators of ecological interactions, enabling plants to anticipate threats, fine-tune adaptive responses, and optimize survival. Their specificity and context-dependency not only enhance individual fitness but also shape community dynamics and trophic interactions [49]. Parasitic organisms, particularly parasitoid females, are remarkably skilled in utilizing many plant-derived cues to locate their hosts [17], as olfactory cues play a pivotal role in host location and egg disposition in parasitoids [50]. Plants release their cues into the environment through the medium roots or leaves as a response to oviposition [51,52,53]. In plants, responses are stimulated through chemicals present in herbivore regurgitation [54], oviduct secretion, and the oral secretion of some larval species of Lepidoptera [54,55,56], which act as elicitors. Afentoulis, Cusumano [57] found a plant, the wild crucifer Brassica nigra, in a tight spot due to oviposition by a herbivorous insect pest, the cabbage white butterfly (Pieris sp.). As a response, oviposition-induced plant volatiles (OIPVs), such as (E)-caryophyllene (a sesquiterpene), attracted T. evanescens. In addition to OVIPs, plants release herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) in reaction to herbivore attacks, which they use to recruit tritrophic natural enemies, acting as a “cry for help” by signaling herbivores to parasitoids that prey on them [58]. Moreover, the application of promising herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) in controlled-release formulations under field conditions can act as arrestants, effectively attracting Trichogramma populations and increasing their residence time while searching for hosts at different developmental stages, thereby enhancing crop pest management. [58]. Octadecane, an HIPV, was used in the formulation of kairomone gel, and its efficacy on the biocontrol potential of T. chilonis against the wheat pink stem borer Sesamia inferens and the chickpea pod borer Helicoverpa armigera was examined under field conditions [58]. The gel formulation of octadecane, when applied 24 h after releasing T. chilonis, enhanced its foraging activity by acting as a kairomone to attract parasitoids to pest eggs, ultimately reducing dead hearts by up to 48.53% in wheat and pod damage by 31.22% in chickpea [58]. More studies on the effects of plant-derived semiochemicals on Trichogramma behavior are described in Table 1.

7. Trichogramma’s Detection of Plant Hypersensitive Response to Herbivore Eggs

Plants have the potential to detect herbivory soon after herbivores oviposit their eggs on plant parts and initiate a range of direct and indirect defense responses to reduce the survival of the herbivores’ eggs (Figure 5). The direct reactions include wound tissue growth, the formation of necrotic cells, and the production of ovicidal substances [72,73]. Additionally, Griese, Caarls [74] identified an indirect response in Brassica crops: they express a hypersensitive response, such as necrosis, underneath pierid butterfly eggs, which leads to the eggs desiccating or falling off the plant. Under necrotic stress, plants activate the lipoxygenase pathway, which involves the hydrolysis of membrane lipids, releasing polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) such as linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid [75] (Figure 5). These PUFAs are oxygenated by lipoxygenase enzymes, resulting in the production of hydroperoxides. The hydroperoxide lyase enzyme then cleaves these hydroperoxides into volatile aldehydes (e.g., hexanal, (3Z)-hexenal), which are key components of green leaf volatiles [75]. Aldehydes, such as benzaldehyde, play a crucial role in attracting T. dendrolimi to orchards. When combined with methyl salicylate and supplemented with linalool oxide or cis-3-hexenyl caproate, these formulations significantly outperformed the control (methyl salicylate), demonstrating the key role of aldehydes in enhancing parasitoid attraction [61,76]. By emitting these volatiles, plants not only defend themselves but also trigger an ecological signaling network, enhancing tritrophic interactions (plant–herbivore–natural enemy) and promoting natural pest control [76] (Figure 5).

8. Age- and Experience-Dependent Responses of Trichogramma to Chemical Cues

8.1. Changes in Chemical Sensitivity with Age

Parasitoid age is the most important factor influencing the sensitivity of Trichogramma to semiochemicals [77]. Guazzelli, Giustina [22] stated that age plays a significant role in T. pretiosum’s chemotactic response and parasitism efficiency. Furthermore, the authors employed the synthetic sex pheromone of the oriental fruit moth Grapholita molesta (Busck, 1916), which consists of the components Z-8-dodecenyl acetate, E-8-dodecenyl acetate, and Z-8-dodecenol in a ratio of 93:6:1, to assess the olfactory response of T. pretiosum. The results revealed that mated male T. pretiosum did not rely on the pheromone for host-searching. However, mated females aged 24–72 h were attracted to the pheromone blend, while 96-h-old females showed a preference for hexane, suggesting an age-related decline in olfactory capabilities. Moreover, experience enhances host recognition, as evidenced by the observation that inexperienced T. pretiosum females exhibit higher parasitism rates in rinsed eggs (G. molesta eggs immersed in a solvent to remove surface chemicals) at 72 and 96 h. However, with age, the females shift their preference to unrinsed eggs, indicating that experience improves their ability to recognize the host [22].

8.2. Learning and Memory in Trichogramma’s Host-Searching Behavior

Research into the effects of miniaturization on the cognitive abilities of insects is indeed one of the most promising and active fields in neurobiology [78,79,80]. Fedorova, Farisenkov [81] investigated the cognitive abilities of T. telengai (Sorokina, 1987), focusing on associative learning and memory despite their small size. Using a thermal arena based on the Morris water maze, the study trained the insects to find a “comfort zone (cooler area)” and tested memory retention up to six hours post-training. The results showed significant memory retention, with the test group spending more time in the target sector (comfort zone) and demonstrating shorter travel paths after repeated training, indicating improved learning. The learning index also revealed significant differences between the test and control groups, demonstrating the insect’s ability to learn and retain information.

9. Role of Experience and Chemical Cues in Host Selection Behavior of Trichogramma

Host insect-derived cues play a crucial role in guiding the foraging behavior of Trichogramma, enabling it to effectively locate its hosts. Acetophenone, anisole, β-myrcene, bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, benzene, (1-methylethyl), and nonanal are chemical cues secreted from H. zea eggs perceived by T. papilionis for parasitism [47]. Based on the identification of these volatiles in host eggs, the following questions arise: firstly, is Trichogramma’s attraction to insect-derived cues age-dependent, and how might this affect its efficacy in biological pest control? Secondly, how does the removal of chemical cues from host eggs (e.g., through rinsing) affect the learning and host localization behavior of Trichogramma parasitoids?
While seeking answers to these questions, we found a recent study conducted by Guazzelli, Giustina [22], who utilized a blend of sex pheromones from Grapholita molesta, including Z-8-dodecenyl acetate, E-8-dodecenyl acetate, and Z-8-dodecenol (93:6:1) [82]. Sexually mature (mated) T. pretiosum males and females of varying ages (24, 48, 72, and 96 h old) were exposed to the pheromones. The result indicated that mated females (24, 48, and 72 h old) were more attracted to the sex pheromone blend of G. molesta than to hexane (control) [22]. In contrast, when female wasps were 96 h old, they preferred the solvent over the pheromone blend [22], indicating that aging leads to behavioral senescence, where both olfactory sensitivity and exploratory activity decline significantly [83]. Ahmadi and Poorjavad [21] also found that the attractiveness of T. evanescens females to T. absoluta’s sex pheromone is impacted by age, with younger females responding more strongly than older females. When evaluating the effectiveness of the parasitoid, experience is a far more important aspect than the age of Trichogramma. In a previous study, experienced (previously encountered the host egg) and inexperienced (had never encountered the host egg) T. pretiosum females of varying ages were exposed to rinsed (washed with a solvent, hexane) and unrinsed eggs of G. molesta. The results revealed that experienced wasps showed a higher parasitism rate in unrinsed eggs at older age (72 and 96 h) (Figure 6). In contrast, inexperienced wasps preferred rinsed eggs at these ages, suggesting that older parasitoids, particularly those with prior experience, rely more on chemical cues to identify suitable hosts. At the same time, younger parasitoids may exhibit a broader approach to host selection due to their longer life expectancy. Nevertheless, additional experiments are required to comprehensively assess the comparative preference for various host types and to substantiate the occurrence of learned behavior in inexperienced female parasitoids (Figure 6). Such studies will be essential to validate the extent to which experience influences host selection and to confirm the mechanisms underlying this learned behavior in naïve individuals.

10. Effect of Associative Learning on Host-Searching Behavior

The host-searching behavior of parasitoids is influenced by associative learning [84]. Associative learning is a cognitive process typically associated with the use of chemical cues during host-searching by parasitoids. This ability enables parasitoids to exhibit flexible behaviors, providing them with a selective advantage, and it allows them to explore various hosts and reduces environmental uncertainty [85]. In this context, Gonthier, Romeis [86] demonstrated that the parasitoids T. achaeae and T. evanescens can learn to associate tomato odor with T. absouluta eggs, enhancing their host-searching efficiency. These results were demonstrated through olfactometer assays, where conditioned parasitoids spent more time in chambers containing the odor of infested tomato leaves than naive parasitoids, who exhibited a repellent response. This behavioral flexibility provides a selective advantage, as it allows parasitoids to explore new hosts such as tomato plants that they might otherwise avoid, thereby improving their parasitism rates [86].

11. Interactions Between Plant Structure, Host Density, and Searching Speed

11.1. Effect of Plant Complexity on Host-Searching Efficiency

The complexity of the plant structure significantly affects the host-finding efficiency of Trichogramma parasitoids [87]. Gingras, Dutilleul [88] stated that there was no significant plant preference between the two parasitoid species T. evanescens and T. pretiosum, although parasitism rates were highest on cabbage and lowest on Brussels sprouts. Parasitism decreased with increased plant age and structural complexity, while cabbage had the highest parasitism rate due to its simpler structure. T. evanescens outperformed T. pretiosum across most plant varieties. Additionally, parasitism was higher on the abaxial leaf surface and at the base of the plant, particularly in older plants [88]. Gingras, Dutilleul [89] also found that simple plant structures, characterized by fewer leaves, less complexity, and fewer connections between plant parts, enabled Trichogramm turkestanica Meyer to search more efficiently for eggs of the Mediterranean flour moth Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller, 1879). Furthermore, on complex plant structures, T. turkestanica spent more time without encountering eggs and less time actively exploring.

11.2. Host Density and Its Influence on Foraging Success

Host egg density plays a crucial role in the parasitism success of Trichogramma. A higher host egg density improves foraging success and increases offspring emergence for parasitoids [90]. Furthermore, the density of one-hundred eggs of the rice moth Corcyra cephalonica provides more resources for oviposition and significantly improves offspring emergence rates for both T. ostriniae and T. dendrolimi. At lower host densities (10, 20, and 30 eggs), competition for limited resources is stronger, and emergence rates vary more widely depending on the parasitoid species and oviposition sequence, indicating that, at lower host densities, foraging success may be reduced because the parasitoids compete more intensely for fewer hosts [90].

11.3. Influence of Host Age on Parasitism by Trichogramma Parasitoids

Host age is also a key factor that influences the parasitism of the parasitoid [91,92]. In this context, Sun, Yan [93] revealed that host egg age significantly influences the parasitism behavior and fitness of T. chilonis. Furthermore, T. chilonis performs optimally on younger eggs (24–72 h) of the potato tuber moth (Phthorimae operculella Zeller, 1873), which provide better nutritional value and support higher offspring emergence rates [93]. Parasitizing older eggs (96+ hours) results in reduced offspring fitness, a smaller body size, and lower fecundity due to the depletion of nutrients and accumulation of defensive substances in older eggs [93,94]. Queiroz, Costa [95] also suggested that the parasitism rate of T. pretiosum is strongly influenced by host egg age, with the highest parasitism occurring in 24-h-old eggs of the velvetbean caterpillar Anticarsia gemmatalis (Hübner, 1818).. These findings are crucial for optimizing the release of T. pretiosum in field application. To maximize the efficiency of biological control, it is important to synchronize the release of T. pretiosum with the most susceptible stage of the host, which is the 1-day-old egg. T. chilonis, T. dendrolimi, T. japonicum, and T. ostriniae perform well on 1-, 2-, and 3-day-old eggs of the rice leafroller Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee, 1854) [96]. Jiang, Zhou [97] stated that T. ostriniae is one of the most promising candidates for advancing biological control strategies against the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917), as this Trichogramma species effectively parasitizes T. absoluta eggs at all developmental stages, positioning it as a potential dominant parasitoid for controlling T. absoluta in China.

11.4. Searching Speed and Host-Finding Behavior in Trichogramma

The searching speed of Trichogramma is the key factor for measuring parasitoid quality [98]. Two- and three-day-old T. minutum searched twice as fast as one-day-old females due to physiological development, increased reproductive motivation, refined foraging skills, and enhanced energy reserves [98]. Suverkropp, Bigler [99] also described the searching pattern of Trichogramma species on maize plants at varying temperatures (18 °C and 25 °C) in relation to residence time. Residence time is also a crucial determinant of host-finding behavior in parasitoids [100]. T. brassicae parasitoids spent an average of 44.9 min on a maize plant at a cooler temperature of 18 °C, compared to 20.8 min at a warmer temperature of 25 °C. Furthermore, the parasitoid primarily moved from one leaf to another and showed a clear preference for leaf areas closest to the stem [99].

12. Environmental and Climate Change Effects on Semiochemical Signaling

12.1. Impact of Climate Change on Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions and Parasitic Behavior

Climate change alters the emission patterns of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from plants, which in turn influences tritrophic interactions, including those between plants, herbivores, and their natural enemies such as parasitoids [101,102]. VOCs are a class of biogenic chemicals released by plants, and they serve as infochemicals [103] that mediate communication within ecological networks and guide insect behaviors [104,105] like food location, host foraging, mate-finding, and parasitism [106]. VOC induction in plants after exposure to heat [107], drought [108], and elevated ozone (O3) levels [109] may increase parasitoid attraction to plants in the absence of herbivores. Munawar, Zhang [107] revealed that high-temperature treatment of potato plants increased the emission of VOCs, notably β-caryophyllene, which played a critical role in plant defense by deterring the herbivore P. operculella while attracting the parasitoid T. chilonis and repelling herbivores. Furthermore, the heat stress enlarged stomatal apertures, increasing VOC release from potato leaf tissues [107].

12.2. Impact of Air Pollution on Trichogramma

Air pollution is an increasing global concern, presenting significant risks to both human health and the environment [110,111]. Furthermore, greenhouse gas pollutants such as carbon dioxide and air pollutants such as O3 or diesel exhaust represent major threats to economically important insects, particularly pollinators and natural pest regulators [112,113]. CO2 decreases the performance and parasitism rate of T. pretiosum [114]. Furthermore, air pollutants, particularly O3 and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from diesel exhaust, significantly disrupt the olfactory-guided foraging behavior of parasitoids by degrading host-related plant volatiles and reducing the insect’s ability to detect chemical signals [115].

13. Novel Approaches for Enhancing Biological Control Through Chemical Cues

13.1. Integrating Semiochemical Technology into Pest Management

The integration of semiochemical technology into pest management has led to several innovations, including enhancing the searching efficiency of natural enemies, directing natural enemies into a specific search mode, making novel or artificial host–prey species suitable for mass rearing, and breeding plant cultivars that emit more natural enemy-attracting synomones [116]. The “push–pull” strategy in pest management utilizes infochemicals to influence insect pest behavior. Insect pests are repelled from crops using chemical cues, such as (E)-β-ocimene and α-terpinolene, which obscure host plant signals. Concurrently, pests are attracted to traps or trap crops using attractive stimuli, facilitating their concentration for more effective control. This innovative strategy enhances integrated pest management by combining repellents and attractants for improved pest control efficiency [116]. Rani and Murali-Baskaran [117] demonstrated that several synthetic phenolic compounds, which are common plant secondary metabolites involved in herbivore-induced defense, function as semiochemical cues for T. chilonis. These compounds were applied directly in laboratory bioassays, including culture tube assays, Y-tube olfactometer assays, host egg surface treatments, and artificial plant models, to evaluate parasitoid orientation and parasitization responses. The study showed that T. chilonis females were attracted to specific phenolics, particularly syringic acid, quercetin, coumaric acid, pyrocatechol, and chlorogenic acid, and that some treated host eggs showed enhanced parasitization. These findings suggest that phenolic compounds can act as natural plant-derived signals or synomones that help egg parasitoids locate host-associated sites, thereby supporting their potential use in biological control strategies. In contrast, Trichogramma cordubensis females were reported to be attracted to honey and the sex pheromone of the armyworm moth Mythimna unipuncta but repelled by vinegar and peppermint essential oil [118], indicating that both attractive and repellent semiochemicals may be incorporated into pest management strategies.

13.2. Developing Multi-Agent Pest Control Strategies

The integration of more than one control method is the most promising tactic to control insect pests [119]. The use of the parasitoid wasps Trichogramma spp. and the bioinsecticide Bacillus thuringiensis to improve biological control is among the common alternative components of integrated management of various insect pests [120]. Nascimento, Fadini [121] investigated the interaction between two biological control agents, T. pretiosum and B. thuringiensis, and found that this entomopathogen did not negatively affect the parasitoid’s behavior in selecting pest eggs, highlighting that the combined use of these agents offers an effective approach to control insect pests. Furthermore, in Iran [122,123] and China [124], various Trichogramma species have been utilized in combination with B. thuringiensis to significantly control various Lepidopteran pests in both greenhouses and fields.

14. Effects of Host Egg Quality on Parasitism Behavior and Parasitoid Performance

Role of Physical Egg Quality in Parasitism

Host egg quality plays a critical role in shaping parasitism behavior and parasitoid performance [125]. Du, Xu [126] demonstrated that Trichogramma parasitoids, including T. japonicum, T. chilonis, and T. leucaniae, parasitized significantly more fertilized eggs than unfertilized ones. Furthermore, the parasitoids developed faster on fertilized eggs than unfertilized eggs. Regarding ovipositional behavior, parasitoids rejected unfertilized eggs after drumming about 3.7 times more often than fertilized eggs. Giri, Pokhrel [127] highlighted the influence of the physical quality of the eggs of the fall armyworm S. frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797), including the scale coverage. The result indicated that T. chilonis encountered a physical barrier and faced difficulty parasitizing fully covered egg masses compared to partially covered or uncovered eggs.

15. Applications of Biological Control with Trichogramma Wasps

Biological control using Trichogramma wasps is a highly effective and sustainable method for pest management, particularly for controlling Lepidopteran pests in agricultural systems [4,11,128,129]. One of the most successful applications of Trichogramma is in controlling the Asian corn borer Ostrinia furnacalis, a major pest in maize crops. In northeastern China, the area of maize treated with Trichogramma release for corn borer control increased from 600,000 to 5,500,000 hectares between 2005 and 2015, representing 35% of the total corn cultivation area in this key corn-producing region [130,131]. To optimize biological control programs, it is crucial to identify the optimal number and developmental stage of natural enemies to be released. In this context, Wang, Hou [132] assessed the parasitism abilities of T. dendrolimi and T. ostriniae under two release methods: the same developmental stage (SDS) and different developmental stages (DDSs). A total of 10,000 wasps from both species were released using these methods. The results showed that T. dendrolimi achieved higher parasitism rates and longer effectiveness (6 days) with the DDS method than the SDS method (3 days). However, the release method had no impact on T. ostriniae, which effectively parasitized O. furnacalis eggs in both methods. The study suggests that the DDS method improves the field performance of T. dendrolimi. More studies on the use of Trichogrmma species as biocontrol agents are described in Table 2.

16. Non-Chemical Cues and Their Role in Host-Searching Behavior

Visual Cues in Host Location

Chemical cues, such as plant or host volatiles, have been extensively documented in host location studies [48,143]. However, visual cues are progressively being acknowledged for their significant role, particularly in short-range host-searching behaviors [144]. The T. ostriniae species exhibited a distinct preference for specific egg colors during its short-range searching behavior. When using colored clay beads to simulate host eggs, the wasps demonstrated a clear preference for yellow over other colors, ranking them as follows: white > yellow > green > black. This preference corresponds to the visual characteristics of the European corn borer’s eggs, the wasp’s primary target [5]. Furthermore, wasps likely utilize color to assess the suitability of potential hosts, with visual cues acting as an efficient means of discriminating between viable and non-viable eggs. Notably, black-colored beads, which may resemble parasitized or damaged eggs, were strongly rejected by the wasps [5]. Keasar, Ney-Nifle [145] demonstrated that Trichogramma thalense exhibits associative learning, where visual cues are shaped by prior experiences. Wasps exposed to black egg cards with A. kuehniella hosts preferred the black background in subsequent tests, while those exposed to green egg cards with hosts preferred the green background. These results suggest that T. thalense forms visual memories associated with host presence, which influences its foraging behavior and enhances host selection efficiency in subsequent phases. These findings challenge the view that parasitoids rely solely on chemical cues and highlight their capacity to form and retain visual memories. This ability could improve biological control programs, as visual cues could be utilized for targeted pest management, thereby opening new research avenues into parasitoid cognition and ecological applications [145]. Furthermore, Trichogramma possesses a limited sensory detection range due to its very small body size and restricted perceptual capacity. Therefore, during short-range host-finding, visual cues may provide more immediate, precise, and reliable information than olfactory cues. When host eggs are visually conspicuous in terms of size, color, shape, or contrast with the surrounding surface, the parasitoid can detect and approach them more effectively through visual orientation. In contrast, olfactory cues released from host eggs may be weak, rapidly dispersed, or difficult to distinguish from background environmental odors at very small spatial scales. As a result, odor alone may not consistently guide the wasps toward suitable hosts. However, when eggs are large and visually prominent, such as Manduca sexta eggs, olfactory signals can complement visual cues by creating a stronger multimodal stimulus. This combined visual and chemical information may enhance host recognition and improve host-finding efficiency. Overall, the findings suggest that short-range host location in Trichogramma is primarily influenced by visual perception and random movement, while odor plays a supplementary role under specific conditions where it is associated with clear visual signals [146].

17. Thioredoxin System

17.1. Role of Thioredoxin (Trx) in Insect Physiology

The thioredoxin (Trx) system is a critical component of an insect’s antioxidant defense system [147]. This system, composed of thioredoxins (Trxs) and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), helps regulate the cellular redox state by reducing oxidized proteins and protecting cells from oxidative stress [148]. Oxidative stress arises from an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the body’s ability to neutralize them, which can lead to the damage of proteins, lipids, and DNA [148]. In insects, the Trx system plays an essential role in maintaining cellular function, particularly in response to environmental stressors like temperature fluctuations [149] and pesticide exposure [150]. Furthermore, during insect diapause, the Trx genes AcTrx2 and AcTrx-like play a key role in antioxidant defense by maintain redox balance, with knockdown triggering compensatory antioxidant responses. A study investigated the thioredoxin genes AcTrx2 and AcTrx-like in Arma chinensis (a predatory stink bug) diapause, revealing their upregulation under oxidative stress to maintain redox balance. Knockdown of these genes increased ROS levels and activated other antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), showing their central role in managing oxidative stress [151]. However, direct measurement of thioredoxin (Trx) activity in Trichogramma during host searching is necessary to further clarify its role in regulating oxidative stress. Additionally, exploring its interaction with enzymes like SOD and CAT could reveal strategies to enhance survival and biological control efficiency.

17.2. Trx and Its Antioxidant Functions

The antioxidant properties of Trx are primarily due to its ability to donate electrons to other proteins in the cell [152]. Trx reduces disulfide bonds in target proteins, converting them back to their active, reduced states. This ability is crucial for maintaining the functionality of metabolic enzymes, transcription factors, and components of the immune system in insects [148]. In addition to its antioxidant properties, Trx is involved in regulating various biological processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, and immune responses [148]. Trx and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) also help regulate other antioxidant enzymes, such as peroxiredoxins (Prxs) and methionine sulphoxide reductases (Msrs), which are important in detoxifying ROS [148]. In insects, this process ensures that oxidative damage is minimized, allowing the insects to maintain their health and reproductive potential, which are key to their success in biological pest control.

18. Conclusions and Future Perspective

The findings of this study highlight the crucial role of semiochemicals in influencing the host-seeking behavior of Trichogramma parasitoids. Both plant-derived and host-derived chemical cues significantly influence the parasitoids’ ability to locate hosts, with particular emphasis on age-dependent responses. The study also highlights the profound impact of chemical cue removal on Trichogramma’s host localization, suggesting that chemical cues play a vital role in learning and host detection processes. These insights into the semiochemical-driven behavior of Trichogramma provide a deeper understanding of its potential in integrated pest management. Future research should focus on identifying the specific plant- and host-derived cues that trigger the strongest responses from Trichogramma parasitoids, particularly in different environmental contexts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W., C.Z., and W.-S.H.; Investigation, C.Z., X.-D.L., and A.I. (Asim Iqbal); Visualization, Y.W., C.Z., and X.-D.L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Y.W., C.Z., and A.I. (Asim Iqbal); Writing—Review and Editing, Y.W., C.Z., and A.I. (Atif Idrees); Funding Acquisition, Y.W. and C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors of this study would like to acknowledge the generous funding provided by the SJLABS Science and Technology Innovation Project “Development and Promotion of Biocontrol Products for Major Diseases and Pests of Staple Grain Crops in Jilin Province” (SJ2025008); the Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology University Doctoral Startup Foundation Project (2022) 717; and the Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology University College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Project (No. XJ202411439010).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this manuscript declare that the ideas, content, and theories presented were not generated through AI-assisted technologies. However, AI tools, including ChatGPT, (Version, GPT-5.3 Instant) were exclusively utilized to improve readability, refine the language, and ensure grammatical accuracy, presenting the content in a formal manner. The use of AI was strictly supervised, and the authors thoroughly reviewed and edited the manuscript to ensure its accuracy, coherence, and adherence to the intended message.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Asim Iqbal was employed by Imdaad: Integrated Facilities Management Company. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Roriz, V.; Oliveira, L.; Garcia, P. Host suitability and preference studies of Trichogramma cordubensis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Biol. Control 2006, 36, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moreau, J.; Richard, A.; Benrey, B.; Thiéry, D. Host plant cultivar of the grapevine moth Lobesia botrana affects the life history traits of an egg parasitoid. Biol. Control 2009, 50, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iranipour, S.; Vaez, N. Egg Parasitoids: Chalcidoidea with Particular Emphasis on Trichogrammatidae. In Biological Control of Insect and Mite Pests in Iran: A Review from Fundamental and Applied Aspects; Karimi, J., Madadi, H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 197–231. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cherif, A.; Mansour, R.; Grissa-Lebdi, K. The egg parasitoids Trichogramma: From laboratory mass rearing to biological control of lepidopteran pests. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2021, 31, 661–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lobdell, C.E.; Yong, T.-H.; Hoffmann, M.P. Host color preferences and short-range searching behavior of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma ostriniae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2005, 116, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pashalidou, F.G.; Huigens, M.E.; Dicke, M.; Fatouros, N.E. The use of oviposition-induced plant cues by Trichogramma egg parasitoids. Ecol. Entomol. 2010, 35, 748–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rani, P.U.; Sambangi, P.; Sandhyarani, K. Impact of Plant Phenolics as Semiochemicals on the Performance of Trichogramma chilonis Ishii. J. Insect Behav. 2017, 30, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brezolin, A.N.; Martinazzo, J.; Muenchen, D.K.; de Cezaro, A.M.; Rigo, A.A.; Steffens, C.; Steffens, J.; Blassioli-Moraes, M.C.; Borges, M. Tools for detecting insect semiochemicals: A review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 4091–4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gontijo, L.; Cascone, P.; Giorgini, M.; Michelozzi, M.; Rodrigues, H.S.; Spiezia, G.; Iodice, L.; Guerrieri, E. Relative importance of host and plant semiochemicals in the foraging behavior of Trichogramma achaeae, an egg parasitoid of Tuta absoluta. J. Pest Sci. 2019, 92, 1479–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sampaio, F.; Marchioro, C.A.; Takahashi, T.A.; Foerster, L.A. A new biocontrol agent against old enemies: The potential of Trichogramma foersteri for the control of Spodoptera frugiperda and Spodoptera eridania. Biol. Control 2024, 192, 105504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zang, L.-S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.; Desneux, N. Biological Control with Trichogramma in China: History, Present Status, and Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Èntomol. 2021, 66, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, H.; Xian, X.; Yang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wan, F.; Guo, J.; Liu, W. Insights from the biogeographic approach for biocontrol of invasive alien pests: Estimating the ecological niche overlap of three egg parasitoids against Spodoptera frugiperda in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 862, 160785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chailleux, A.; Bearez, P.; Pizzol, J.; Amiens-Desneux, E.; Ramirez-Romero, R.; Desneux, N. Potential for combined use of parasitoids and generalist predators for biological control of the key invasive tomato pest Tuta absoluta. J. Pest Sci. 2013, 86, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chailleux, A.; Biondi, A.; Han, P.; Tabone, E.; Desneux, N. Suitability of the Pest–Plant System Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)–Tomato for Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Parasitoids and Insights for Biological Control. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 2310–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fatouros, N.E.; Dicke, M.; Mumm, R.; Meiners, T.; Hilker, M. Foraging behavior of egg parasitoids exploiting chemical information. Behav. Ecol. 2008, 19, 677–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Laxmi, K.P.; Rani, P.U. Behavioral responses of parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis towards infochemicals from host plant Solanum melongena and pest Leucinodes orbonalis. Int. J. Entomol. Res. 2019, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  17. Greenberg, L.O.; Huigens, M.E.; Groot, A.T.; Cusumano, A.; Fatouros, N.E. Finding an egg in a haystack: Variation in chemical cue use by egg parasitoids of herbivorous insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2023, 55, 101002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Reddy, G.V.P.; Guerrero, A. Interactions of insect pheromones and plant semiochemicals. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Anderson, P.; Anton, S. Experience-based modulation of behavioural responses to plant volatiles and other sensory cues in insect herbivores. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1826–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Xu, H.; Turlings, T.C.J. Plant Volatiles as Mate-Finding Cues for Insects. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ahmadi, S.; Poorjavad, N. Behavioral and Biological Effects of Exposure to Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Sex Pheromone on Several Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Populations. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 2667–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Guazzelli, P.; Giustina, D.; Luiza, R.; Redaelli, J.; Sant’ana, N.; Leite, N. Influence of Grapholita molesta semiochemicals on chemotaxis, parasitism, and learning ability of Trichogramma pretiosum. Bull. Insectology 2022, 75, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  23. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, S.-S.; Yan, Z.-C.; Zhao, J.-J.; Li, Y.-X. Transcriptomic analyses of chemosensory genes in Trichogramma japonicum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2021, 37, 100755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wicher, D.; Miazzi, F. Functional properties of insect olfactory receptors: Ionotropic receptors and odorant receptors. Cell Tissue Res. 2021, 383, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Weiss, L.A.; Dahanukar, A.; Kwon, J.Y.; Banerjee, D.; Carlson, J.R. The Molecular and Cellular Basis of Bitter Taste in Drosophila. Neuron 2011, 69, 258–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Larsson, M.C.; Domingos, A.I.; Jones, W.D.; Chiappe, M.E.; Amrein, H.; Vosshall, L.B. Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction. Neuron 2004, 43, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sato, K.; Pellegrino, M.; Nakagawa, T.; Nakagawa, T.; Vosshall, L.B.; Touhara, K. Insect olfactory receptors are heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels. Nature 2008, 452, 1002–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Robertson, H.M.; Warr, C.G.; Carlson, J.R. Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 14537–14542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ni, L. The Structure and Function of Ionotropic Receptors in Drosophila. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 638839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, X.; Jiang, Z.; Jiao, X.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hou, Y.; Duan, G.; Du, W.; Ruan, C.; Zhang, J.; et al. Genome Assembly and Comparative Analysis of the Egg Parasitoid Wasp Trichogramma dendrolimi Shed Light on the Composition and Evolution of Olfactory Receptors and Venoms. Insects 2023, 14, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brunetti, A.E.; Carnevale Neto, F.; Vera, M.C.; Taboada, C.; Pavarini, D.P.; Bauermeister, A.; Lopes, N.P. An integrative omics perspective for the analysis of chemical signals in ecological interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 1574–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Serdo, D.F. Insects’ perception and behavioral responses to plant semiochemicals. PeerJ 2024, 12, e17735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ando, T.; Yamamoto, M. Semiochemicals containing lepidopteran sex pheromones: Wonderland for a natural product chemist. J. Pestic. Sci. 2020, 45, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Anukiruthika, T.; Jayas, D.S. Chemical cues in grain storage: A review on semiochemical types, pest behavior, and control strategies. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2025, 113, 102674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ouaba, J.; Tchuinkam, T.; Waïmane, A.; Otieno Magara, H.J.; Niassy, S.; Meutchieye, F. Lepidopterans of economic importance in Cameroon: A systematic review. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 8, 100286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, G.; Ma, C.-S. Differences in the nocturnal flight activity of insect pests and beneficial predatory insects recorded by light traps: Possible use of a beneficial-friendly trapping strategy for controlling insect pests. Eur. J. Entomol. 2012, 109, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. El-Ghany, N.M.A. Semiochemicals for controlling insect pests. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2019, 59, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  39. Montezano, D.G.; Sosa-Gómez, D.; Specht, A.; Roque-Specht, V.F.; Sousa-Silva, J.C.; Paula-Moraes, S.d.; Peterson, J.A.; Hunt, T.E. Host plants of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the Americas. Afr. Entomol. 2018, 26, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma, S.; Sharma, P.L.; Sharma, P.; Verma, S.C.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, P. Demographic analysis and biotic potential of Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on pea. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2024, 114, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kannan, M.; Elango, K.; Kalyanasundaram, M.; Govindaraju, K. Ultra-structural and physico-chemical characterization of eggs and egg hairs (setae) of the new invasive pest, fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in India: A first report. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2021, 84, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vargas, C.C.; Redaelli, L.R.; Sant’Ana, J.; Blassioli-Moraes, M.C.; Laumann, R.A.; Borges, M. Influence of semiochemicals present in the scales of Spodoptera frugiperda on chemotactic behavior of Trichogramma pretiosum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2021, 169, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schmidt, H.R.; Benton, R. Molecular mechanisms of olfactory detection in insects: Beyond receptors. Open Biol. 2020, 10, 200252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Al-Jalely, B.H.; Xu, W. Olfactory Sensilla and Olfactory Genes in the Parasitoid Wasp Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Insects 2021, 12, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kong, X.-x.; Zhang, H.-x.; Liang, H.-y.; Xiao, H.; Wang, Y.-q.; Gang, S.; Dong, H. TostOBP12 mediates the olfactory response to host volatiles in the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma ostriniae. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2026, 188, 104491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fatouros, N.E.; Bukovinszkine’Kiss, G.; Dicke, M.; Hilker, M. The Response Specificity of Trichogramma Egg Parasitoids towards Infochemicals during Host Location. J. Insect Behav. 2007, 20, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ali, A.N.; Wright, M.G. Response of Trichogramma papilionis to semiochemicals induced by host oviposition on plants. Biol. Control 2021, 154, 104510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tian, Z.; Wang, Y.; Sun, T.; Hu, X.; Hao, W.; Zhao, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, X.; Turlings, T.C.J.; et al. An egg parasitoid assesses host egg quality from afar using oviposition-induced plant volatiles. Curr. Biol. 2025, 35, 3001–3010.e3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ninkovic, V.; Markovic, D.; Rensing, M. Plant volatiles as cues and signals in plant communication. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 1030–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Iacovone, A.; French, A.S.; Tellier, F.; Cusumano, A.; Clément, G.; Gaertner, C.; Conti, E.; Salerno, G.; Marion-Poll, F. The role of contact chemoreception in the host location process of an egg parasitoid. J. Insect Physiol. 2016, 91–92, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Elhakeem, A.; Markovic, D.; Broberg, A.; Anten, N.P.R.; Ninkovic, V. Aboveground mechanical stimuli affect belowground plant-plant communication. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fernández, P.C.; Braccini, C.L.; Dávila, C.; Barrozo, R.B.; Aráoz, M.V.C.; Cerrillo, T.; Gershenzon, J.; Reichelt, M.; Zavala, J.A. The use of Leaf Surface Contact Cues During Oviposition Explains Field Preferences in the Willow Sawfly Nematus oligospilus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rizaludin, M.S.; Stopnisek, N.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Garbeva, P. The Chemistry of Stress: Understanding the ‘Cry for Help’ of Plant Roots. Metabolites 2021, 11, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Felton, G.W.; Chung, S.H.; Hernandez, M.G.E.; Louis, J.; Peiffer, M.; Tian, D. Herbivore Oral Secretions are the First Line of Protection Against Plant-Induced Defences. In Annual Plant Reviews; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 37–76. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hilker, M.; Stein, C.; Schröder, R.; Varama, M.; Mumm, R. Insect egg deposition induces defence responses in Pinus sylvestris: Characterisation of the elicitor. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208, 1849–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Eveleigh, E.; Silk, P.; Leclair, G.; Mayo, P.; Francis, B.; Williams, M. Spruce Budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Oral Secretions I: Biology and Function. Environ. Entomol. 2015, 44, 1641–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  57. Afentoulis, D.G.; Cusumano, A.; Greenberg, L.O.; Caarls, L.; Fatouros, N.E. Attraction of Trichogramma Wasps to Butterfly Oviposition-Induced Plant Volatiles Depends on Brassica Species, Wasp Strain and Leaf Necrosis. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 9, 703134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pawar, P.; Murali Baskaran, R.K.; Sharma, K.C.; Marathe, A. Enhancing biocontrol potential of Trichogramma chilonis against borer pests of wheat and chickpea. iScience 2023, 26, 106512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bai, S.-X.; Wang, Z.-Y.; He, K.-L.; Im, D.-J. Olfactory Response of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) to Volatiles Emitted by Mungbean Plants. Agric. Sci. China 2011, 10, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cusumano, A.; Weldegergis, B.T.; Colazza, S.; Dicke, M.; Fatouros, N.E. Attraction of egg-killing parasitoids toward induced plant volatiles in a multi-herbivore context. Oecologia 2015, 179, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zhao, J.; Liang, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Cheng, J.; Du, Y. Evaluation and optimization of blends for attracting Trichogramma dendrolimi based on semiochemicals mediating tritrophic interactions in the orchard habitat. Biol. Control 2022, 173, 104998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tamiru, A.; Bruce, T.J.; Woodcock, C.M.; Caulfield, J.C.; Midega, C.A.; Ogol, C.K.; Mayon, P.; Birkett, M.A.; Pickett, J.A.; Khan, Z.R. Maize landraces recruit egg and larval parasitoids in response to egg deposition by a herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hu, X.; Liang, Q.; Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Wu, J.; Ma, H.; Qi, Y.; Tang, M.; Ma, Y.; Chen, L.; et al. 2-Phenylethanol and o-Cresol Repel the Tomato Leaf Miner Phthorimaea absoluta and Attract the Parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2026, 74, 3514–3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nascimento, P.T.; Fadini, M.A.M.; Rocha, M.S.; Souza, C.S.F.; Barros, B.A.; Melo, J.O.F.; Von Pinho, R.G.; Valicente, F.H. Response of Trichogramma pretiosum females (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) to herbivore-induced Bt maize volatiles. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2021, 15, 107–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Alsaedi, G.; Ashouri, A.; Talaei-Hassanloui, R. Behavioral responses of the three Trichogramma species to different odor sources. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2016, 4, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lopes, F.B.; Sant’Ana, J. Responses of Spodoptera frugiperda and Trichogramma pretiosum to Rice Plants Exposed to Herbivory and Phytohormones. Neotrop. Entomol. 2019, 48, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Murali-Baskaran, R.K.; Yele, Y.; Sharma, K.C. Herbivore-induced pulse crop volatiles: Roles in non-nutritiveness to Spodoptera litura fitness and parasitoid attraction. J. Nat. Pestic. Res. 2025, 14, 100155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Weber, N.C.; Sant’Ana, J.; Redaelli, L.R.; Dawud, E.F. Tomato plant defense induced by methyl jasmonate impacts on foraging behavior and parasitism of Trichogramma pretiosum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2023, 171, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ponzio, C.; Cascone, P.; Cusumano, A.; Weldegergis, B.T.; Fatouros, N.E.; Guerrieri, E.; Dicke, M.; Gols, R. Volatile-mediated foraging behaviour of three parasitoid species under conditions of dual insect herbivore attack. Anim. Behav. 2016, 111, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zannou, A.J.; Arnó, J.; Romeis, J.; Collatz, J. Compatibility of biocontrol agents with host plant resistance for management of the South American tomato pinworm Phthorimaea absoluta. Biol. Control 2025, 205, 105772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Raghava, T.; Ravikumar, P.; Hegde, R.; Kush, A. Spatial and temporal volatile organic compound response of select tomato cultivars to herbivory and mechanical injury. Plant Sci. 2010, 179, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fatouros, N.E.; Cusumano, A.; Danchin, E.G.J.; Colazza, S. Prospects of herbivore egg-killing plant defenses for sustainable crop protection. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 6906–6918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hilker, M.; Fatouros, N.E. Resisting the onset of herbivore attack: Plants perceive and respond to insect eggs. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 32, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Griese, E.; Caarls, L.; Bassetti, N.; Mohammadin, S.; Verbaarschot, P.; Bukovinszkine’Kiss, G.; Poelman, E.H.; Gols, R.; Schranz, M.E.; Fatouros, N.E. Insect egg-killing: A new front on the evolutionary arms-race between brassicaceous plants and pierid butterflies. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Vincenti, S.; Mariani, M.; Alberti, J.-C.; Jacopini, S.; Brunini-Bronzini de Caraffa, V.; Berti, L.; Maury, J. Biocatalytic Synthesis of Natural Green Leaf Volatiles Using the Lipoxygenase Metabolic Pathway. Catalysts 2019, 9, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ali, M.Y.; Naseem, T.; Holopainen, J.K.; Liu, T.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F. Tritrophic Interactions among Arthropod Natural Enemies, Herbivores and Plants Considering Volatile Blends at Different Scale Levels. Cells 2023, 12, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tabebordbar, F.; Shishehbor, P.; Ebrahimi, E.; Polaszek, A.; Riddick, E.W. Parasitoid age and host age interact to improve life history parameters and rearing of Trichogramma euproctidis. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2022, 32, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Makarova, A.A.; Polilov, A.A.; Chklovskii, D.B. Small brains for big science. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2021, 71, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Waddell, S.; Park, A. Cognitive primitives of the insect brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2025, 30, 194–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Polilov, A.A.; Makarova, A.A.; Kolesnikova, U.K. Cognitive abilities with a tiny brain: Neuronal structures and associative learning in the minute Nephanes titan (Coleoptera: Ptiliidae). Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2019, 48, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Fedorova, M.A.; Farisenkov, S.E.; Timokhov, A.V.; Polilov, A.A. ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING AND MEMORY IN TRICHOGRAMMA TELENGAI (HYMENOPTERA, TRICHOGRAMMATIDAE). Russ. J. Zool. 2023, 102, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, J.; Zhang, L. Research progress on olfactory proteins involved in the recognition of sex pheromones and host volatiles in three lepidopteran fruit borers. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2025, 28, 102455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tasnin, M.S.; Merkel, K.; Clarke, A.R. Effects of advanced age on olfactory response of male and female Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Insect Physiol. 2020, 122, 104024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ferreira Santos de Aquino, M.; Dias, A.M.; Borges, M.; Moraes, M.C.B.; Laumann, R.A. Influence of visual cues on host-searching and learning behaviour of the egg parasitoids Telenomus podisi and Trissolcus basalis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2012, 145, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Papaj, D.R.; Lewis, A.C. Insect Learning: Ecology and Evolutinary Perspectives; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  86. Gonthier, J.; Romeis, J.; Collatz, J. Species-specific learning of host plant cues in Trichogramma egg parasitoids. IOBC-WPRS Bull. 2023, 166, 44–45. [Google Scholar]
  87. Gingras, D.; Boivin, G. Effect Of Plant Structure, Host Density And Foraging Duration On Host Finding By Trichogramma evanescens (Hymenoptera:Trichogrammatidae). Environ. Entomol. 2002, 31, 1153–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gingras, D.; Dutilleul, P.; Boivin, G. Effect of plant structure on host finding capacity of lepidopterous pests of crucifers by two Trichogramma parasitoids. Biol. Control 2003, 27, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gingras, D.; Dutilleul, P.; Boivin, G. Effect of plant structure on searching strategy and searching efficiency of Trichogramma turkestanica. J. Insect Sci. 2008, 8, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Wang, Y.; Iqbal, A.; Ahmed, K.S.; Zhang, Z.-K.; Cui, J.; Zhang, C. Impact of Oviposition Sequence and Host Egg Density on Offspring Emergence and Interspecific Competition in Two Species of Trichogramma Parasitoids. Insects 2025, 16, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Saini, A.; Sharma, P.L.; Chandel, R.S. Host age influence on the parasitism of the species Cotesia vestalis (Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2019, 29, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Koutsogeorgiou, E.I.; Moysiadis, T.; Fifis, G.T.; Gogolashvili, N.E.; Chatzimpalasis, D.; Andreadis, S.S. Age- and Density-Dependent Parasitism Rate and Development Time of the Generalist Egg-Parasitoid Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on Eggs of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys. Insects 2024, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sun, G.; Yan, Y.; Cai, H.; Yang, Y.; Li, Z.; Cao, Y.; Lei, H.; Dai, Y.; Xiao, G.; Chen, B. Egg-age dependent parasitism by Trichogramma chilonis: Implications for host-use pattern and strategy of parasitoid in biological control on Phthorimaea operculella. Pest Manag. Sci. 2026, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Man, X.; Francis, F.; Megido, R.C.; Wan, F.; Yang, N.; Liu, W. Adaptive strategies in parasitoid wasps: Implications for enhanced biological control. Entomol. Gen. 2025, 45, 905–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Queiroz, A.P.d.; Costa, C.O.; Favetti, B.M.; Silva, G.V.; Bueno, A.d.F. Effects of parasitoid and host age on the parasitism of Trichogramma pretiosum on eggs of Anticarsia gemmatalis. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2020, 64, e2019105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tian, J.-C.; Wang, Z.-C.; Wang, G.-R.; Zhong, L.-Q.; Zheng, X.-S.; Xu, H.-X.; Zang, L.-S.; Lu, Z.-X. The Effects of Temperature and Host Age on the Fecundity of Four Trichogramma Species, Egg Parasitoids of the Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 949–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Jiang, Z.-X.; Zhou, S.-W.; Yi, H.-M.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.-L.; Chen, G.-H.; Du, L.-Y.; Zhang, X.-M. Assessing parasitism and suitability of three Trichogramma parasitoids Tuta (=Phthorimaea) absoluta (Meyrick) based on parasitoid and host ages. Crop Prot. 2025, 190, 107099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Van Hezewijk, B.H.; Bourchier, R.S.; Smith, S.M. Searching Speed of Trichogramma minutum and Its Potential as a Measure of Parasitoid Quality. Biol. Control 2000, 17, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Suverkropp, B.; Bigler, F.; van Lenteren, J. Movement and host finding of Trichogramma brassicae on maize plants. Bull. Insectology 2010, 63, 115–127. [Google Scholar]
  100. Boivin, G.; Fauvergue, X.; Wajnberg, E. Optimal patch residence time in egg parasitoids: Innate versus learned estimate of patch quality. Oecologia 2004, 138, 640–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Boullis, A.; Francis, F.; Verheggen, F.J. Climate Change and Tritrophic Interactions: Will Modifications to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Increase the Vulnerability of Herbivorous Insects to Natural Enemies? Environ. Entomol. 2015, 44, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Abbas, F.; O’Neill Rothenberg, D.; Zhou, Y.; Ke, Y.; Wang, H.-C. Volatile organic compounds as mediators of plant communication and adaptation to climate change. Physiol. Plant. 2022, 174, e13840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Wang, L.; Lun, X.; Wang, Q.; Wu, J. Biogenic volatile organic compounds emissions, atmospheric chemistry, and environmental implications: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22, 3033–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kamala Jayanthi, P.D.; Raghava, T.; Kempraj, V. Functional Diversity of Infochemicals in Agri-Ecological Networks. In Innovative Pest Management Approaches for the 21st Century: Harnessing Automated Unmanned Technologies; Chakravarthy, A.K., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 187–208. [Google Scholar]
  105. Chakravarthy, A.K. Innovative Pest Management Approaches for the 21st Century: Harnessing Automated Unmanned Technologies; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  106. Sun, Y.; Tian, C.; Xu, P.; Dong, J.; Wang, S. Semiochemicals Used by Insect Parasitoids and Hyperparasitoids in Complex Chemical Environments and Their Application in Insect Pest Management. Horticulturae 2026, 12, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Munawar, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, J.; Ge, Y.; Abou El-Ela, A.S.; Mao, Z.; Ntiri, E.S.; Mao, L.-J.; Zhu, Z.; Zhou, W. Heat stress affects potato’s volatile emissions that mediate agronomically important trophic interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 3036–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Salerno, G.; Frati, F.; Marino, G.; Ederli, L.; Pasqualini, S.; Loreto, F.; Colazza, S.; Centritto, M. Effects of water stress on emission of volatile organic compounds by Vicia faba, and consequences for attraction of the egg parasitoid Trissolcus basalis. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 635–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cui, H.; Su, J.; Wei, J.; Hu, Y.; Ge, F. Elevated O3 enhances the attraction of whitefly-infested tomato plants to Encarsia formosa. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Chen, Z.-Y.; Petetin, H.; Méndez Turrubiates, R.F.; Achebak, H.; Pérez García-Pando, C.; Ballester, J. Population exposure to multiple air pollutants and its compound episodes in Europe. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Sigmund, G.; Ågerstrand, M.; Antonelli, A.; Backhaus, T.; Brodin, T.; Diamond, M.L.; Erdelen, W.R.; Evers, D.C.; Hofmann, T.; Hueffer, T.; et al. Addressing chemical pollution in biodiversity research. Glob. Change Biol. 2023, 29, 3240–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ryalls, J.M.W.; Bishop, J.; Mofikoya, A.O.; Bromfield, L.M.; Nakagawa, S.; Girling, R.D. Air pollution disproportionately impairs beneficial invertebrates: A meta-analysis. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ryalls, J.M.W.; Bromfield, L.M.; Mullinger, N.J.; Langford, B.; Mofikoya, A.O.; Pfrang, C.; Nemitz, E.; Blande, J.D.; Girling, R.D. Diesel exhaust and ozone adversely affect pollinators and parasitoids within flying insect communities. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 958, 177802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Coelho, A.; Geremias, L.D.; Alves, G.R.; da Rocha, A.C.P.; Parra, J.R.P. The biology of Trichogramma pretiosum as atmospheric O2 becomes depleted and CO2 accumulates. Biol. Control 2017, 105, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Pinto-Zevallos, D.M.; Blande, J.D. Challenges of climate change and air pollution for volatile-mediated plant–parasitoid signalling. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2024, 66, 101290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Sheikh, A.A.; Khursheed, I.; Ahmad, M.J.; Ahad, I.; Tali, F.A.; Nabi, S.U. Role of infochemicals to enhance the efficacy of biocontrol agents in pest management. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2017, 5, 655–662. [Google Scholar]
  117. Rani, M.; Murali-Baskaran, R.K. Semiochemical potential of elicitor–induced plant volatiles strengthen wheat defense and enhance Trichogramma-mediated biological control of pink stem borer. J. Nat. Pestic. Res. 2026, 15, 100182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bresch, C.; van Oudenhove, L. A New Experimental Setup to Study the Olfactory Behaviour of Trichogramma Egg Parasitoids. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2026, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Pedigo, L.P.; Rice, M.E.; Krell, R.K. Entomology and Pest Management, 7th ed.; Waveland Press: Long Grove, IL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  120. Vaez, N.; Iranipour, S.; Hejazi, M.J. Effect of treating eggs of cotton bollworm with Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner on functional response of Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2013, 46, 2501–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nascimento, P.T.; Fadini, M.A.M.; Valicente, F.H.; Ribeiro, P.E.A. Does Bacillus thuringiensis have adverse effects on the host egg location by parasitoid wasps? Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2018, 62, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Jamshidnia, A.; Abdoli, S.; Farrokhi, S.; Sadeghi, R. Efficiency of spinosad, Bacillus thuringiensis and Trichogramma brassicae against the tomato leafminer in greenhouse. BioControl 2018, 63, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Alsaedi, G.; Ashouri, A.; Talaei-Hassanloui, R. Assessment of two Trichogramma species with Bacillus thuringiensis var. krustaki for the control of the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Iran. Open J. Ecol. 2017, 7, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Cheng, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, X.; Shang, S.; Bukero, A.A.; Zhang, F. Non-target effects of Bacillus thuringiensis and Metarhizium anisopliae on egg parasitoids of Spodoptera frugiperda. Biol. Control 2026, 213, 105957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Fardiansah, R.; Rehling, F.; Rappa, N.J.; Dormann, C.F.; Klein, A.-M. Host identity, nest quality, and parasitism strategy: Influences on body size variation in parasitoid bees and wasps. Oikos 2025, 2025, e011052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Du, W.-M.; Xu, J.; Hou, Y.-Y.; Lin, Y.; Zang, L.S.; Yang, X.; Zhang, J.-J.; Ruan, C.-C.; Desneux, N. Trichogramma parasitoids can distinguish between fertilized and unfertilized host eggs. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 771–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Giri, K.; Pokhrel, M.R.; Bhandari, G. Influence of egg traits on parasitism by Trichogramma chilonis Ishii, 1941 and Telenomus remus Nixon, 1937 against Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797). Front. Insect Sci. 2026, 6, 1749736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Thilak, K.S.; Parmar, D.N.; Rajeshbhai, M.A. Parasitoids as Biological Control Agents in Agroecosystems. In Role of Beneficial Insects in Agricultural Ecosystems; Sarangi, S., Reddy, S.N., Guntupalli, S., Aulakh, G.K., Eds.; Textify Publishers: Lucknow, India, 2025; pp. 178–202. [Google Scholar]
  129. Navik, O.; Yele, Y.; Kedar, S.C.; Sushil, S.N. Biological control of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) using egg parasitoids, Trichogramma species (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae): A review. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2023, 33, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Huang, N.-X.; Jaworski, C.C.; Desneux, N.; Zhang, F.; Yang, P.-Y.; Wang, S. Long-term and large-scale releases of Trichogramma promote pesticide decrease in maize in northeastern China. Entomol. Gen. 2020, 40, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhang, J.; Ruan, C.; Zang, L.; Shao, X.; Shi, S. Technological improvements for mass production of Trichogramma and current status of their applications for biological control on agricultural pests in China. Chin. J. Biol. Control 2015, 31, 638. [Google Scholar]
  132. Wang, Y.; Hou, Y.-Y.; Iqbal, A.; Wang, S.; Monticelli, L.S.; Desneux, N.; Zang, L.-S. Inundative release of Trichogramma dendrolimi at different developmental stages enhances the control efficacy over Ostrinia furnacalis. J. Pest Sci. 2024, 97, 1889–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gavara, J.; Cabello, T.; Gámez, M.; Bastin, S.; Hernández-Suárez, E.; Piedra-Buena, A. Evaluation and Selection of New Trichogramma spp. as Biological Control Agents of the Guatemalan Potato Moth (Tecia solanivora) in Europe. Insects 2023, 14, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Steidle, J.L.M.; Rees, D.; Wright, E.J. Assessment of Australian Trichogramma species (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) as control agents of stored product moths. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2001, 37, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Murali-Baskaran, R.K.; Chander Sharma, K.; Sridhar, J.; Jain, L.; Kumar, J. Multiple releases of Trichogramma japonicum Ashmead for biocontrol of rice yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker). Crop Prot. 2021, 141, 105471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yang, L.; Li, F.; Lü, X.; Xing, B.; Pan, X.; Shi, X.; Li, J.; Wu, S. Performance of three Trichogramma species as biocontrol agents on Spodoptera frugiperda eggs. J. Appl. Entomol. 2022, 146, 1019–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Tang, R.; Babendreier, D.; Zhang, F.; Kang, M.; Song, K.; Hou, M.-L. Assessment of Trichogramma japonicum and T. chilonis as Potential Biological Control Agents of Yellow Stem Borer in Rice. Insects 2017, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Sutil, W.P.; Roswadoski, L.; Bueno, A.d.F.; Colmenarez, Y.C.; Maciel, R.A.M. From laboratory to field: Performance and interaction dynamics of Telenomus remus and Trichogramma pretiosum for biological control of lepidopteran maize pests. Biol. Control 2026, 216, 106025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Xue, J.-Z.; Tariq, T.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Tang, L.-D.; Luo, R.-B.; Sun, Y.; Hu, C.-C.; Zang, L.-S. Eri silkworm eggs as a superior factitious host for mass rearing Trichogramma leucaniae, the key natural enemy of soybean pod borer. Biol. Control 2025, 209, 105860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Raven, C.; Nahrung, H.F. Trichogramma spp. as potential augmentative biocontrol agents of Poinciana looper, Pericyma cruegeri (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 50, 126656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Myint, Y.; Huang, X.; Shuxiong, B.; Zhang, T.; Babendreier, D.; He, K.; Wang, Z. Field evaluation of Trichogramma strains collected from Myanmar for biological control of Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and sustainable maize production. Crop Prot. 2023, 171, 106284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Wang, Z.-Y.; He, K.-L.; Zhang, F.; Lu, X.; Babendreier, D. Mass rearing and release of Trichogramma for biological control of insect pests of corn in China. Biol. Control 2014, 68, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kong, X.-X.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Che, W.-N.; Zhou, J.-C.; Dong, H. Identification of compounds from the egg volatiles of Asia corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis, that attract egg parasitoid, Trichogramma ostriniae. Pest Manag. Sci. 2025, 81, 7827–7835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Morehead, S.; Feener, D., Jr. Visual and Chemical Cues Used in Host Location and Acceptance by a Dipteran Parasitoid. J. Insect Behav. 2000, 13, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Keasar, T.; Ney-Nifle, M.; Mangel, M. Evidence for Learning of Visual Host-Associated Cues in the Parasitoid Wasp Trichogramma Thalense. Isr. J. Zool. 2000, 46, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Gardner, J.; Hoffmann, M.P. How important is vision in short-range host-finding by Trichogramma ostriniae used for augmentative biological control? Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2020, 30, 531–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yao, P.; Chen, X.; Yan, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, X.; Xu, B. Glutaredoxin 1, glutaredoxin 2, thioredoxin 1, and thioredoxin peroxidase 3 play important roles in antioxidant defense in Apis cerana cerana. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 68, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Gřešková, A.; Petřivalský, M. Thioredoxin System in Insects: Uncovering the Roles of Thioredoxins and Thioredoxin Reductase beyond the Antioxidant Defences. Insects 2024, 15, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Zhang, S.; Li, Z.; Nian, X.; Wu, F.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X. Sequence analysis, expression profiles and function of thioredoxin 2 and thioredoxin reductase 1 in resistance to nucleopolyhedrovirus in Helicoverpa armigera. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Gao, Y.; Liu, D.-Y.; Deng, Q.; Feng, W.-L.; Yu, J.-M.; Li, M.-Y.; Liu, S. Characterization of the thioredoxin peroxidase gene and its role in lambda-cyhalothrin tolerance in Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2025, 28, 102403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Shen, Z.; Luo, Q.; Mao, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, L. Molecular identification of two thioredoxin genes and their function in antioxidant defense in Arma chinensis diapause. Front. Physiol. 2024, 15, 1440531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Lu, J.; Holmgren, A. The thioredoxin antioxidant system. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 66, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The literature was systematically screened and meticulously retrieved from prominent scientific databases in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.
Figure 1. The literature was systematically screened and meticulously retrieved from prominent scientific databases in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.
Plants 15 01918 g001
Figure 2. A keyword co-occurrence map illustrating the clustering of frequently used keywords in the literature (generated with VOSviewer version 1.6.19). The size of each node reflects the frequency of keyword occurrence, with larger nodes indicating higher frequency. The connecting lines represent the relationships between the keywords.
Figure 2. A keyword co-occurrence map illustrating the clustering of frequently used keywords in the literature (generated with VOSviewer version 1.6.19). The size of each node reflects the frequency of keyword occurrence, with larger nodes indicating higher frequency. The connecting lines represent the relationships between the keywords.
Plants 15 01918 g002
Figure 3. Percent contribution of research articles published in each year.
Figure 3. Percent contribution of research articles published in each year.
Plants 15 01918 g003
Figure 4. Interaction between rice plants, rice leaf folder eggs, and Trichogramma japonicum. Created in BioRender. Ahmed, K. S. (2026) https://BioRender.com/vcvg1cf (accessed on 3 June 2026).
Figure 4. Interaction between rice plants, rice leaf folder eggs, and Trichogramma japonicum. Created in BioRender. Ahmed, K. S. (2026) https://BioRender.com/vcvg1cf (accessed on 3 June 2026).
Plants 15 01918 g004
Figure 5. Plants respond to herbivore oviposition through a combination of direct responses (necrosis, wound growth, ovicidal substances) and indirect responses mediated by the lipoxygenase pathway, producing volatile aldehydes that attract natural enemies (parasitoid wasps), thereby enhancing ecological pest control. Created in BioRender. Ahmed, K. S. (2026) https://BioRender.com/phrg105 (accessed on 3 June 2026).
Figure 5. Plants respond to herbivore oviposition through a combination of direct responses (necrosis, wound growth, ovicidal substances) and indirect responses mediated by the lipoxygenase pathway, producing volatile aldehydes that attract natural enemies (parasitoid wasps), thereby enhancing ecological pest control. Created in BioRender. Ahmed, K. S. (2026) https://BioRender.com/phrg105 (accessed on 3 June 2026).
Plants 15 01918 g005
Figure 6. Age and experience dependence of Trichogramma host location behavior via insect-derived chemical cues. Created in BioRender. Ahmed, K. S. (2026) https://BioRender.com/zmxo305 (accessed on 3 June 2026).
Figure 6. Age and experience dependence of Trichogramma host location behavior via insect-derived chemical cues. Created in BioRender. Ahmed, K. S. (2026) https://BioRender.com/zmxo305 (accessed on 3 June 2026).
Plants 15 01918 g006
Table 1. Effect of plant-derived semiochemicals on Trichogramma behavior.
Table 1. Effect of plant-derived semiochemicals on Trichogramma behavior.
Effect on Trichogramma BehaviorTrichogramma SpeciesChemical ClassIdentified Compound(s)Source PlantReference
AttractiveTrichogramma ostriniaeMonoterpeneLimoneneMung bean, Vigna radiata[59]
Attractive (enhanced foraging)T. brassicae, T. evanescensTerpenes(E)-β-ocimene, linaloolBlack mustard, Brassica nigra[60]
Attractive (enhanced foraging)T. achaeaeMonoterpene, fatty acid ester, terpene esterα-pinene, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, tetradeca-3,8,11-trienyl acetateTomato, Solanum lycopersicum[9]
AttractionT. papilionisAromatic ketone, sesquiterpenoid, ether, terpene, ester, phthalate ester, phenylpropene, phthalateAcetophenone, anisole, α-farnesene, β-myrcene, cis-3-hexenyl butyric acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, trans-isoeugenol, Di-2-ethylhexylphathalateMaize, Zea mays and sun hemp, Crotalaria juncea[47]
AttractionT. dendrolimiEster, aldehyde, terpene, esterMethyl salicylate, benzaldehyde, linalool oxide, Cis-3-hexenyl caproatePear, Pyrus communis
Peach, Prunus persica
[61]
AttractionT. bournieriSesquiterpene hydrocarbon(E)-(1R,9S)-caryophylleneMaize, Zea mays[62]
AttractionT. chilonisPhenol, ortho-cresol2-phenylethanol, o-cresolTomato, Solanum lycopersicum[63]
AttractionT. pretiosumTerpenoid, sesquiterpene, sesquiterpene aromatic hydrocarbon, monoterpene ketone, ester, sesquiterpene, and benzenoid/salicylate derivativeLinalool, β-gurjunene, calamene, thujone, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, (E,E)-α-farnesene, and methyl salicylate Maize, Zea mays[64]
Weak attraction of T. brassicae, T. evanescens to healthy plant odor (40–45%), whereas Trichogramma embryophagum was positively attracted to healthy plant odor (60%)T. brassicae, T. evanescens, T. embryophagumNot informedNot informedTomato, Solanum lycopersicum [65]
Positive chemotactic behaviorT. pretiosumJasmonate, phenolic acidMethyl jasmonate, salicylic acid Rice, Oryza sativa[66]
AttractionT. japonicumAlkane, esterEicosane, octane, dodecane, tetrapentacontane, dotriacontane, henicosane, octadecane, ethyl acetateCow pea, Vigna unguiculata; green gram, Vigna radiate; black gram, Vigna mungo; soybean, Glycine max[67]
AttractionT. pretiosumJasmonateMethyl jasmonateTomato, Solanum lycopersicum[68]
AttractionT. brassicaeNitriles, alcohols, ketones, isothiocyanates, esters, terpenes, sesquiterpenes, disulfides, monoterpenes 2-butenenitrile, 3-butenenitrile, 1-penten-3-ol, 3-pentanone, 2-methylbutanenitrile, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, allyl isothiocyanate, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol acetate, (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene (E-DMNT), 7-b-H-silphiperfol-5-ene, silphiperfol-6-ene, dimethyl disulphide, myrcene, isomenthone, 7-a-H-silphiperfol-5-ene, pre-silphiperfol-7-ene, silphiperfola-5,7(14)-diene, alpha-funebrene, longifolen, beta-caryophyllene, alpha-caryophyllene, (E,E)-alpha-farnesene, tricyclo[6.3.0.0(1,5)]undec-2-en-4-one, 2,3,5,9-tetramethyl (TUT),Black mustard, Brassica nigra[69]
Lower attractionT. achaeaeNitriles, isothiocyanates, alcohols2-butenenitrile, allyl isothiocyanate, 3-pentanone, (Z)-3-hexen-1-olResistant wild tomato, Solanum arcanum [70]
Higer attractionT. achaeaeAlcohols, terpenes, sesquiterpenes(Z)-3-hexen-1-ol acetate, myrcene, alpha-caryophyllene, beta-caryophylleneResistant domesticated tomato, Solanum neorickii, Corona F1
Higher attractionT. achaeaeNitriles, alcohols, terpenes1-penten-3-ol, (E,E)-alpha-farnesene, (Z)-3-hexen-1-olSusceptible tomatoes, Rentita, Romabelle F1
AttractionT. chilonisMonoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, aldehydesMyrcene, phellandrene, caryophyllene, limonene, careneTomato, Solanum lycopersicum[71]
Octadecane application significantly enhanced parasitoid attractionT. chilonisSaturated hydrocarbonsn-hexadecanoic acid, n-octadecanoic acid, octadecaneWheat, Triticum spp. and chickpea, Cicer arietinum[58]
Table 2. Use of Trichogramma species in biological pest control.
Table 2. Use of Trichogramma species in biological pest control.
AuthorsTrichogramma Species UsedPest SpeciesCrop/Host PlantEffectiveness in Pest ControlGeographical DistributionRelease MethodNumber of ReleasesNumber of Wasps Per ReleaseBenefitsChallengesApplicability (Crop/Area)
Gavara, Cabello [133]T. achaeae, T. euproctidisTecia solanivora solanivora (Guatemalan potato moth)Potato cropsHigh, particularly under field conditionsCanary Islands, SpainLaboratory & semi-field tests2 releases60 wasps per releaseEfficient in searching for eggs in soil, adaptable for field useLimited performance under dark conditions; unsuitable under storage conditionsPotato crops in Canary Islands
Steidle, Rees [134]T. brassicae, T. pretiosum, T. carveraeEphestia kuehniella (Mediterranean flour moth or mill moth), Ephestia cautella (almond moth)Stored products (grain)Moderate, low host acceptance and fecundityAustraliaInundative releaseNINIT. brassicae: Low host acceptance; inexpensive; T. pretiosum: Best for use, high fecundity and host acceptance; T. carverae: Good host-finding ability, low host acceptanceLow acceptance, especially at low host densityStored grain-processing facilities
Murali-Baskaran, Chander Sharma [135]T. japonicumScirpophaga incertulas (Yellow Stem Borer)Rice (cv. Swarna)Significant reduction in dead heart (54.7%) and white ear (66.1%)India (Raipur, Chhattisgarh)Inundative release4 (weekly intervals)50,000 wasps/ha × 4 releasesEffective in reducing pest damage and improving yieldDependent on climate and pest cycles; requires careful timing of releasesRice fields, particularly for controlling YSB
Yang, Li [136]T. chilonis, T. dendrolimi, and T. pretiosumSpodoptera frugiperda (Fall Armyworm)Maize (corn)Parasitism rates: T. chilonis: 10.65–24.49%; T. dendrolimi: 17.90–31.40%; T. pretiosum: 16.61–30.20%China, Hong KongInundative releases of parasitized egg cards (each containing approximately 2000 parasitized eggs). Release conditions: Parasitoid release ratio of 1:1 (parasitoids to FAW eggs).Five releases100 wasps were released per cage along with 100 FAW eggsSignificant reduction in damage rate and index and maize yield increase of 19.4%Inconsistent parasitism across different species in terms of environmental conditions, particularly temperature.Effective in Hainan, Guangdong, and Hong Kong, with potential for broader expansion.
Tang, Babendreier [137]T. japonicum, T. chilonisScirpophaga incertulas (Yellow Stem Borer)Rice (Oryza sativa)In cage tests: T. japonicum: 60% parasitism, 15.8% egg parasitism. T. chilonis: 40.7% parasitism, 2.8% egg parasitism. In field trials: T. japonicum: 9.0% ± 7.6% parasitism, 0.35% ± 0.36% egg parasitism. T. chilonis: 15.1% ± 14.1% parasitism, 0.68% ± 0.66% egg parasitismSouthwestern ChinaInundative releaseThree release densities were tested: 50,000/ha, 100,000/ha, and 200,000/ha wasps.50,000, 100,000, and 200,000 wasps per hectare, at 100 release points per hectareT. japonicum showed higher parasitism than T. chilonis in both tests. T. chilonis was effective but had lower rates.Low parasitism, especially for T. chilonis
Egg mass accessibility hindered by protective hairs
Concerns over mass-reared wasp quality due to transport/rearing conditions
Mainly for rice fields in regions affected by Scirpophaga incertulas, particularly in Southwestern China.
Sutil, Roswadoski [138]T. pretiosumSpodoptera frugiperda (Fall Armyworm), Helicoverpa armigera (Cotton bollworm)Maize (corn)T. pretiosum preferred H. armigera eggs (13.5%) over S. frugiperda (3.2%).BrazilT. pretiosum was released in envelopes at 100,000 parasitoids per hectare.Three releases were performed per treatment over two consecutive maize seasons.T. pretiosum: 100,000 parasitoids/haT. pretiosum is more effective on H. armigera.T. pretiosum struggled with thick-shelled eggsThese parasitoids can control S. frugiperda and H. armigera in maize.
Xue, Tariq [139]T. leucaniaeLeguminivora glycinivorella (Soybean Pod Borer)SoybeanT. leucaniae improved parasitism from 43.33% to 90% over ten generations and was more effective on soybean pod borer eggs when reared on eri silkworm eggs.ChinaInundative releaseMulti-generational rearing (F1 to F10) with regular parasitoid releases over successive generationsHigh-density releasesEri silkworm eggs enabled cost-effective rearing of T. leucaniae with over 80% parasitism.Rearing on Corcyra and Antheraea reduced performance, while eri silkworm is superior but needs adaptation.Eri silkworm eggs are a sustainable source for mass-rearing T. leucaniae, boosting biocontrol in soybean crops.
Raven and Nahrung [140]T. carverae, T. pretiosum, T. nr finiculatumPericyma cruegeri (Poinciana looper)Poinciana (Delonix regia) treesAll Trichogramma species reduced Pericyma cruegeri emergence by 58%, with T. nr finiculatum most effective, averaging 2.1 wasps per egg.AustraliaInundative releaseSingle releaseNIAll Trichogramma species parasitized P. cruegeri eggs, with T. nr finiculatum being the most effective for pest control.T. carverae was slower than T. nr finiculatum, and multiple wasp emergence may reduce efficiency.Ideal for urban Queensland, offering a sustainable, non-chemical solution for Poinciana looper control.
Jiang, Zhou [97]T. ostriniae, T. chilonis, T. dendrolimiTuta absoluta (Tomato Leafminer)TomatoT. ostriniae outperformed T. chilonis and T. dendrolimi in parasitizing Tuta absoluta eggs, with better performance at all ages.ChinaInundative releaseMultiple release sessionsOne female Trichogramma was released per dish with 30 Tuta absoluta eggs.T. ostriniae was most effective, then T. chilonis, with T. dendrolimi least effective on older eggs.As egg age increased, parasitism and emergence decreased. T. dendrolimi struggled with older eggs, reducing its field reliability.T. ostriniae is best for Tuta absoluta control in Yunnan tomatoes, with T. chilonis as a secondary option.
Myint, Huang [141]T. ostriniae, T. dendrolimiOstrinia furnacalis (Asian corn borer)MaizeT. ostriniae from Yatsawk had 89% parasitism, increased maize yield by 60%, and reduced damage and yield loss by 50%.MyanmarInundative releasesTwo releasesThree release densities were tested: 50,000 wasps/ha (low), 100,000 wasps/ha (medium), 200,000 wasps/ha (high).T. ostriniae from Yatsawk reduced plant damage (60–80%) and yield loss (50%), boosting maize yield by 60%.Optimal release density, timing, and environmental factors are crucial for pest control, with field validation needed for long-term efficacy.This study provides a sustainable, cost-effective alternative to pesticides for maize in Myanmar.
Wang, He [142]T. dendrolimi, T. chilonis, T. ostriniaeOstrinia furnacalis (Asian corn borer), Helicoverpa armigera (Cotton bollworm), Conogethes punctiferalis (Yellow peach moth)Corn (Zea mays)T. ostriniae controls Ostrinia furnacalis in China, parasitizing 90% of eggs, while T. dendrolimi and T. chilonis offer variable effectiveness.Northeast China, Southwest ChinaInundative releaseReleases occurred in two Asian corn borer generations, with 150,000–300,000 wasps per hectare and multiple releases per season.150,000 to 300,000 wasps per hectareTrichogramma reduced damage by 92%, increased parasitism to 85%, and reduced pesticide use.Trichogramma effectiveness varies by climate, and production is costly with storage and transport challenges.Trichogramma is used in key corn regions to control O. furnacalis, H. armigera, and C. punctiferalis.
NI: not informed.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Liu, X.-D.; Iqbal, A.; Idrees, A.; Zhang, C.; He, W.-S. Semiochemical-Mediated Host-Searching and Biological Control Potential of Trichogramma Wasps: Mechanisms, Behavioral Plasticity, and Pest Management Applications. Plants 2026, 15, 1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15121918

AMA Style

Wang Y, Liu X-D, Iqbal A, Idrees A, Zhang C, He W-S. Semiochemical-Mediated Host-Searching and Biological Control Potential of Trichogramma Wasps: Mechanisms, Behavioral Plasticity, and Pest Management Applications. Plants. 2026; 15(12):1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15121918

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yu, Xu-Dong Liu, Asim Iqbal, Atif Idrees, Chen Zhang, and Wan-Sheng He. 2026. "Semiochemical-Mediated Host-Searching and Biological Control Potential of Trichogramma Wasps: Mechanisms, Behavioral Plasticity, and Pest Management Applications" Plants 15, no. 12: 1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15121918

APA Style

Wang, Y., Liu, X.-D., Iqbal, A., Idrees, A., Zhang, C., & He, W.-S. (2026). Semiochemical-Mediated Host-Searching and Biological Control Potential of Trichogramma Wasps: Mechanisms, Behavioral Plasticity, and Pest Management Applications. Plants, 15(12), 1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15121918

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop